Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #838006 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-12-09 11:32 -0600 |
| Last post | 2021-12-09 15:04 -0800 |
| Articles | 11 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2021-12-09 11:32 -0600
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-12-09 09:34 -0800
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-12-09 09:53 -0800
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2021-12-09 12:04 -0800
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-12-09 15:01 -0800
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2021-12-09 13:10 -0800
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2021-12-09 16:51 -0600
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-12-09 15:09 -0800
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-12-09 15:47 -0800
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2021-12-14 10:19 -0600
Re: for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-12-09 15:04 -0800
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 11:32 -0600 |
| Subject | for the Pretend Science Guy James McGinn "I'm a meteorologists (and an atmospheric physicist). What's distinctive about me is that I'm 200 years ahead of them in regard to the physics of storms." |
| Message-ID | <sotejo$mha$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics go post in alt.sci.fiction you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) K. Parker 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 Verified Purchase The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. hunter 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 09:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f6971a6f-0838-4ca8-8198-0779e8550a58n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #838006 |
On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: > the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics > go post in alt.sci.fiction > > you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... > (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) > > > > > K. Parker > 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling > Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 > > Verified Purchase > The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, > are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive > buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a > mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. > > > hunter > 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke > Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 > > This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors > about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an > example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. How many books have you written?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 09:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3es98i-6nei.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #838007 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: >> the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics >> go post in alt.sci.fiction >> >> you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... >> (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) >> >> >> >> >> K. Parker >> 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling >> Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 >> >> Verified Purchase >> The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, >> are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive >> buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a >> mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. >> >> >> hunter >> 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke >> Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 >> >> This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors >> about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an >> example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. > > How many books have you written? How many books, not counting the pop ups with cute animals, have you read, McGinn?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 12:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f36dda6f-ea4e-4a81-954f-39c400378531n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #838018 |
On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 10:01:10 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote: > James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: > >> the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics > >> go post in alt.sci.fiction > >> > >> you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... > >> (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> K. Parker > >> 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling > >> Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 > >> > >> Verified Purchase > >> The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, > >> are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive > >> buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a > >> mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. > >> > >> > >> hunter > >> 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke > >> Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 > >> > >> This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors > >> about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an > >> example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. > > > > How many books have you written? > How many books, not counting the pop ups with cute animals, have you > read, McGinn? Answer the question Sergio.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 15:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dfea8i-muqi.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #838034 |
Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 10:01:10 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: >> >> the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics >> >> go post in alt.sci.fiction >> >> >> >> you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... >> >> (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> K. Parker >> >> 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling >> >> Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 >> >> >> >> Verified Purchase >> >> The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, >> >> are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive >> >> buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a >> >> mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. >> >> >> >> >> >> hunter >> >> 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke >> >> Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 >> >> >> >> This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors >> >> about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an >> >> example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. >> > >> > How many books have you written? >> How many books, not counting the pop ups with cute animals, have you >> read, McGinn? > > Answer the question Sergio. Why are you responding to my post with a question for Sergio? Do we add the inability to respond to a post to your list of failures?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 13:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5f945af8-8dcf-41a3-a3b6-8abd1031d844n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #838006 |
On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: > the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics > go post in alt.sci.fiction > > you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... > (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) > > > > > K. Parker > 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling > Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 > > Verified Purchase > The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, > are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive > buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a > mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. > > > hunter > 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke > Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 > > This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors > about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an > example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. Sergio, provide a list of your published papers. Let's compare what you have produced compared to McGinn. You too Pennino. Provide a list of your papers. Claudius Denk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 16:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sou199$1e2n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #838052 |
On 12/9/2021 3:10 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: >> the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics >> go post in alt.sci.fiction >> >> you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... >> (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) >> >> >> >> >> K. Parker >> 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling >> Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 >> >> Verified Purchase >> The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, >> are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive >> buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a >> mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. >> >> >> hunter >> 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke >> Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 >> >> This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors >> about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an >> example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. > > Sergio, provide a list of your published papers. go buy mine, required text at most Universities https://www.amazon.com/Mathematical-Theory-Feynman-Path-Integrals-ebook/dp/B01KZE8FV6 Let's compare what you have produced compared to McGinn. > > You too Pennino. Provide a list of your papers. > > Claudius Denk >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 15:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <tuea8i-muqi.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #838063 |
Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 12/9/2021 3:10 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: >> On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: >>> the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics >>> go post in alt.sci.fiction >>> >>> you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... >>> (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> K. Parker >>> 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling >>> Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 >>> >>> Verified Purchase >>> The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, >>> are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive >>> buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a >>> mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. >>> >>> >>> hunter >>> 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke >>> Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 >>> >>> This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors >>> about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an >>> example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. >> >> Sergio, provide a list of your published papers. > > > go buy mine, required text at most Universities > > https://www.amazon.com/Mathematical-Theory-Feynman-Path-Integrals-ebook/dp/B01KZE8FV6 > > > Let's compare what you have produced compared to McGinn. >> >> You too Pennino. Provide a list of your papers. >> >> Claudius Denk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergio_Albeverio#Selected_publications "Over 900 publications in scientific journals or volumes of proceedings." McGinn gets his ass handed to him on a platter once again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 15:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c8140af0-2a9d-4f61-8836-2afb36d5b879n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #838063 |
On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 5:51:26 PM UTC-5, Serg io wrote: > On 12/9/2021 3:10 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: > >> the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics > >> go post in alt.sci.fiction > >> > >> you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... > >> (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> K. Parker > >> 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling > >> Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 > >> > >> Verified Purchase > >> The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, > >> are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive > >> buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a > >> mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. > >> > >> > >> hunter > >> 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke > >> Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 > >> > >> This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors > >> about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an > >> example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. > > > > Sergio, provide a list of your published papers. > go buy mine, required text at most Universities > > https://www.amazon.com/Mathematical-Theory-Feynman-Path-Integrals-ebook/dp/B01KZE8FV6 > Let's compare what you have produced compared to McGinn. > > > > You too Pennino. Provide a list of your papers. > > > > Claudius Denk > > Very impressive! In time I hope I could ask you some good questions. Thanks for being the signal here among so much noise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-14 10:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <spag6v$12o7$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #838063 |
On 12/9/2021 4:51 PM, Serg io wrote: > On 12/9/2021 3:10 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: >> On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: >>> the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics >>> go post in alt.sci.fiction >>> >>> you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... >>> (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> K. Parker >>> 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling >>> Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 >>> >>> Verified Purchase >>> The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, >>> are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive >>> buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a >>> mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. >>> >>> >>> hunter >>> 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke >>> Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 >>> >>> This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors >>> about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an >>> example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. >> >> Sergio, provide a list of your published papers. > > > go buy mine, required text at most Universities > > https://www.amazon.com/Mathematical-Theory-Feynman-Path-Integrals-ebook/dp/B01KZE8FV6 > > > Let's compare what you have produced compared to McGinn. >> >> You too Pennino. Provide a list of your papers. >> >> Claudius Denk >> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-09 15:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5kea8i-muqi.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #838052 |
Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:32:46 AM UTC-8, Serg io wrote: >> the only reason I post these real facts below, is because you are posting again in sci.physics >> go post in alt.sci.fiction >> >> you sold 2 books for 99 cents each. 52 pages, here are the reviews of your buyers... >> (Just label it a science fiction, all better!) >> >> >> >> >> K. Parker >> 1.0 out of 5 stars insane rambling >> Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2014 >> >> Verified Purchase >> The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, >> are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive >> buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a >> mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. >> >> >> hunter >> 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of time, a non-funny joke >> Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2014 >> >> This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors >> about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an >> example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing. > > Sergio, provide a list of your published papers. Let's compare what you have produced compared to McGinn. You ARE McGinn, delusional fuck wit. > You too Pennino. Provide a list of your papers. Sorry, they are all proprietary and even if they were not, you would not understand the big words. > Claudius Denk/James McGinn/Solving Tornadoes/delusional fuck wit
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web