Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #834500 > unrolled thread

Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-)

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-19 12:02 -0500
    Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-19 13:51 -0500
      Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-20 10:22 -0500
        Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-20 13:16 -0500
          Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-20 13:52 -0500
          Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-20 19:11 -0500
      Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-21 15:19 -0500
        Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-22 09:53 -0500
          Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-24 11:13 -0500
      Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-15 12:24 -0600
        Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-16 14:53 -0600
          Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-17 14:35 -0600
          Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-17 21:54 -0600
    Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-22 12:19 -0400
      Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutter Freak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-24 07:27 -0700
    Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-25 11:30 -0500
      Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-27 10:35 -0500
        Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-03 22:35 -0500
          Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 12:52 -0600
            Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 14:57 -0800
              Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-08 17:25 -0600
                Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 16:52 -0800
                  Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-08 19:40 -0600
                    Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 20:58 -0800
                      Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-09 00:05 -0600
                Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-08 23:10 -0500
                  Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 20:59 -0800
                  Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-08 23:44 -0600
                    Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-09 00:08 -0600
                    Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-09 03:42 -0800
                      Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-09 08:59 -0600
                      Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-09 13:25 -0800
              Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-09 22:15 -0800
                Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-10 10:32 -0600
            Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-09 09:32 -0600
              Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-09 10:08 -0600
                Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-10 12:23 -0600
        Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 13:17 -0500
          Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 12:05 -0600
            Everybody who could do something quit in disgust. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-07 15:14 -0800
            Your Analytics Compartments :-) Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-07 15:45 -0800
          Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-) Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-09 12:27 -0600
            Get "woke", go broke. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-09 15:14 -0800
              Re: Get "woke", go broke. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-09 20:05 -0500
                Re: Get "woke", go broke. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-10 07:46 -0600

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#834500 — Re: Your Analytics Compartments :-)

On 6/2/2021 4:43 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> On 6/1/2021 12:10 AM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>> On 5/31/2021 11:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>> who dares to see if these politicians are Jews or not! Hehe :)
>>
>>
>> And who dares to see if these politicians are being paid by Jews or 
>> not! Do you know how many pissed Jews are after your asses? You 
>> thought they would simply leave you to your fucking selves like that 
>> after Hitler?
>>
>> Your last chance to coexist with Modern Man expired when Carter at the 
>> top of what height cro-magnon could ever get decided to destroy modern 
>> man's arrangements for the middle east. The chance Iran's Shah was 
>> willing to give you low lives to go on alongside modern man in history 
>> proved to be undeserved.
>>
> 
> 
> And Carter did so right after fresh information and experience with 
> Vietnamese modern men in "flip flops" could deliver to your asses.
> 
> We all saw you clear and close. We saw what you cros ever can be. Shah's 
> plan provided you with the _last_ chance, and you while possessing 
> everything that you wanted in the world, failed it. So Jews got back 
> loose on you again, but the entirety of modern man population on earth 
> were on their side this time!
> 
> THAT's how the most powerful country in the world gets to become a 
> 2nd-world humongous entity sitting there just to be milked and for no 
> other purpose. Milked, fucked over and over and over, incapable to help 
> itself, controlled to every bite of information it could ever get, 
> genetically manipulated into dumber and dumber human by mighty large 
> dicks of African cannibals, and above all "proudly" serving the Jews :-)
> 
> Enjoy it motherfuckers. Be what you asked for.
> 
> 


Alright. For some reason I have to stay home today, my daily walking is 
out of the question. So I've gotten a chance to take a look at this blog 
and put some more words in it.

Some time back, from this point in the blog tree I started another 
branch that involved concentrating on man-woman relationship and 
consequences there of. As it should've, it lead to very interesting 
evolutionary insights. Now I come back here and continue with the main 
theme of the blog. The analytics compartments in human brain.

Recently by chance I got to see a few youtube channels' uploads that 
depicted the recent form of life in U.S. cities for those who abuse 
substances. I noticed that almost all of these "junkies", so to speak, 
were either Cro-Magnon or Black. Rarely ever you'd see Modern Human 
among them. No Chinese, no Vietnames, no Hispanics, not one Indian, and 
not one Iranian among them,.. although population of these ethnic groups 
in USA today is significant; indeed about 30% of population are Modern 
Humans (i.e. neither Cro-Magnon nor Black).

Population distribution in USA should on average result in one modern 
human per every three junkies in the streets in those videos. But we 
don't see that! Indeed we don't see _one_ modern human in almost all 
those hundred or so junkies. There is a reason for that of course.

Analytics compartments of brain!

I don't know about Blacks at all, never studied them. But we do see the 
right proportion of Cro-Magnons and Blacks in those junkies. 80% 
Cro-Magnon and 20% black (2020 census gave 57.8% Cro, 12.1% Black - 
essentially same proportions in their junkies as in their respective 
total populations in USA). This means there is a significant difference 
between cro-magnons and Blacks on one side, and the modern humans on the 
other side. This difference, whatever it is, has led to the propensity 
of the former to get entrapped with substance addictions and near total 
loss of control of their lives.

It is evident to me that control of one's life depends on analytical 
thinking of the person. So when times get even slightly tough we first 
see cro-magnons and Blacks losing that control.

But that's me, not you. So if I can show you dimwits how superior 
analytical thinking leads to better control of one's life and therefore 
a much lower risk of seeing a life on the edges of streets, I've shown 
you dimwits that modern human is endowed with better analytical thinking 
than cro-magnons and Blacks.

Because, again, we don't see modern humans among those junkies.

So now the interesting part, the digging in :) Why and what role 
analytical compartments play in one's life anyway? I'll come back a 
little later to word if for you absolutely dumbfuck dimwits :-)








-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#834506

On 10/19/2021 12:02 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> 
>>
> 
> 
> Alright. For some reason I have to stay home today, my daily walking is 
> out of the question. So I've gotten a chance to take a look at this blog 
> and put some more words in it.
> 
> Some time back, from this point in the blog tree I started another 
> branch that involved concentrating on man-woman relationship and 
> consequences there of. As it should've, it lead to very interesting 
> evolutionary insights. Now I come back here and continue with the main 
> theme of the blog. The analytics compartments in human brain.
> 
> Recently by chance I got to see a few youtube channels' uploads that 
> depicted the recent form of life in U.S. cities for those who abuse 
> substances. I noticed that almost all of these "junkies", so to speak, 
> were either Cro-Magnon or Black. Rarely ever you'd see Modern Human 
> among them. No Chinese, no Vietnames, no Hispanics, not one Indian, and 
> not one Iranian among them,.. although population of these ethnic groups 
> in USA today is significant; indeed about 30% of population are Modern 
> Humans (i.e. neither Cro-Magnon nor Black).
> 
> Population distribution in USA should on average result in one modern 
> human per every three junkies in the streets in those videos. But we 
> don't see that! Indeed we don't see _one_ modern human in almost all 
> those hundred or so junkies. There is a reason for that of course.
> 
> Analytics compartments of brain!
> 
> I don't know about Blacks at all, never studied them. But we do see the 
> right proportion of Cro-Magnons and Blacks in those junkies. 80% 
> Cro-Magnon and 20% black (2020 census gave 57.8% Cro, 12.1% Black - 
> essentially same proportions in their junkies as in their respective 
> total populations in USA). This means there is a significant difference 
> between cro-magnons and Blacks on one side, and the modern humans on the 
> other side. This difference, whatever it is, has led to the propensity 
> of the former to get entrapped with substance addictions and near total 
> loss of control of their lives.
> 
> It is evident to me that control of one's life depends on analytical 
> thinking of the person. So when times get even slightly tough we first 
> see cro-magnons and Blacks losing that control.
> 
> But that's me, not you. So if I can show you dimwits how superior 
> analytical thinking leads to better control of one's life and therefore 
> a much lower risk of seeing a life on the edges of streets, I've shown 
> you dimwits that modern human is endowed with better analytical thinking 
> than cro-magnons and Blacks.
> 
> Because, again, we don't see modern humans among those junkies.
> 
> So now the interesting part, the digging in :) Why and what role 
> analytical compartments play in one's life anyway? I'll come back a 
> little later to word if for you absolutely dumbfuck dimwits :-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Just saying "Cro-Magnon man is less endowed with analytical thinking 
than Modern Human" is somewhat too general. A Cro might not even 
understand what I'm pointing at. You can't make someone understand a 
difference quite well if one party in that comparison is not even quite 
accessible to him to see. He'd only conclude "that one's different" and 
not what the difference exactly is between the two parties in the 
comparison. So better I break it down into more detail if I expect that 
some feeble-minded Cro will one day get the courage to read these lines.

Analytical thinking (just like an "object" or "class" in C++ programming 
language) has a few very important "functions" as well as a few very 
important "attributes." This applies to both Cros and modern humans of 
course.

But that compartment ("class" or "object" in C++) in modern humans 
contains a few more functions and some very different attributes from 
those in Cros. I don't need to go over the functions and attributes that 
are shared in both species; all I need is to explain those functions and 
attributes that are either different between the two species or are 
totally missing in one.

So here it is as I see it and have thought about it. I will first start 
with the function of Substitution in our analytical compartments.

Modern Human (MH) can substitute! He does it much better than a 
cro-magnon human (CH) can. When an important resource for living is 
taken away from MH or is no longer available to him, he will 
successfully _substitute_ for it! CH doesn't and cannot do that as well 
as MH, therefore will begin suffering endlessly from the lack of that 
resource.

Example 1. Typically when a CH is fired from his job he gets into an 
extended course of depression that takes months or sometimes years to 
recover from. Even in the presence of news media they show the pink slip 
to reporters while they're crying.. . I've seen it several times both 
during years that I watched TV and in my own surroundings and in between 
various colleagues. It is harder for a CH to substitute for the lost job.

Example 2. Junkies (almost exclusively CH and Black) weren't able to 
substitute for what they didn't have at some point, either in their 
surroundings or within themselves. They failed to find something as 
effective as what they didn't have anymore to continue their lives 
undisturbed. MH _always_ finds a substitute as effective as what he lost 
in his life. So we don't see MH junkies in areas where both MH and CH 
live side by side.

Substitution isn't done only as a result of losing something. It is 
employed also in cases that a better resource becomes available! I.e. in 
cases that a _change_ of resource would be beneficial. It is harder for 
a CH to change that resource while he still has it. His deeply rooted 
group-thinking is in the way, conforming with the rest of the group and 
staying with same resource even if he recognizes the superiority of the 
other resource.

This function is extremely important. If you think about it, we got here 
by substituting one idea with another better one. We used to huff and 
grunt, didn't we. But we substituted it with words! We substituted tools 
for what we couldn't do with our fingers and muscles alone. You get the 
idea. MH has this ability in him much more than a CH does. There are 
hardly any CH that learns a foreign language or two. But you see 
millions and millions of other MH who know one or more foreign languages 
in addition to their mother tongues. etc and etc. Examples are plenty.

We substituted huge stores of goods and trade material with currency. 
Yes it was MH that did it first.

Once at one end of a warehouse I and a Cro and a Mexican found ourselves 
having to cut some tough strips fast and none had a knife with us. It 
was a working holiday and staff everywhere was at the minimum but line 
was working. The Cro attempted to solve the problem by running towards 
the other end of the warehouse to get his knife. That "other end" was at 
least half a mile away! But a line was waiting for us to start moving 
and each minute cost the company several thousand dollars... I, instead, 
quickly got busy cutting the strip with my portable tiny can opener (you 
may have seen them in military - it's got a tiny little blade) which was 
hanging from my keychain. The Mexican, on the other hand, climbed a 
column up like a monkey and got to the light bulb, unscrewed it and 
dropped it to the ground. Then jumped down and used what was left of it 
as an unbelievably sharp and effective knife! ... I was dumbfounded by 
his quick action. I think it was a nice example of substituting for 
something that was not accessible.

In my next blog I'll write about another function in analytical thinking 
that you don't see much of among CH, namely, Solving the Right Problem! 
:-) Hehe :)


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834533

On 10/19/2021 1:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> Just saying "Cro-Magnon man is less endowed with analytical thinking 
> than Modern Human" is somewhat too general. A Cro might not even 
> understand what I'm pointing at. You can't make someone understand a 
> difference quite well if one party in that comparison is not even quite 
> accessible to him to see. He'd only conclude "that one's different" and 
> not what the difference exactly is between the two parties in the 
> comparison.


This is what Curzon did. This "top brain of the last two centuries" 
could only understand that Iranians were "different" from Cro-Magnons. 
But he couldn't describe the difference itself because he didn't know 
exactly what the difference was! He just kept giving examples and cases 
in Iranians that bewildered him and convinced him of _not_ knowing what 
they were. He could not discover how and why this human species was 
different, only "that one's different", as I said in last blog above.

And this was from Britain's most intelligent man they'd seen in 2 
centuries.

He didn't write another voluminous book about Indians unfortunately. If 
he had, you'd see the same bewilderment expressed there as well. Not too 
long after studying Iranians he became viceroy of India for about 6 years.

My calculated guess is that he did see the same difference about Indians 
as well and suddenly discovered, as a result, that it is not Iranians 
and Indians and Chinese and ... that are different! That it was the 
Cro-Magnon people that were different from humanity in general! It 
must've been too depressing for him to articulate that discovery this 
time around, like he'd done so well in lengthy passages and pages about 
Iranians. I think that's why he did not write another book.


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834538

On 10/20/2021 10:22 AM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 10/19/2021 1:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
>> Just saying "Cro-Magnon man is less endowed with analytical thinking 
>> than Modern Human" is somewhat too general. A Cro might not even 
>> understand what I'm pointing at. You can't make someone understand a 
>> difference quite well if one party in that comparison is not even 
>> quite accessible to him to see. He'd only conclude "that one's 
>> different" and not what the difference exactly is between the two 
>> parties in the comparison.
> 
> 
> This is what Curzon did. This "top brain of the last two centuries" 
> could only understand that Iranians were "different" from Cro-Magnons. 
> But he couldn't describe the difference itself because he didn't know 
> exactly what the difference was! He just kept giving examples and cases 
> in Iranians that bewildered him and convinced him of _not_ knowing what 
> they were. He could not discover how and why this human species was 
> different, only "that one's different", as I said in last blog above.
> 
> And this was from Britain's most intelligent man they'd seen in 2 
> centuries.
> 
> He didn't write another voluminous book about Indians unfortunately. If 
> he had, you'd see the same bewilderment expressed there as well. Not too 
> long after studying Iranians he became viceroy of India for about 6 years.
> 
> My calculated guess is that he did see the same difference about Indians 
> as well and suddenly discovered, as a result, that it is not Iranians 
> and Indians and Chinese and ... that are different! That it was the 
> Cro-Magnon people that were different from humanity in general! It 
> must've been too depressing for him to articulate that discovery this 
> time around, like he'd done so well in lengthy passages and pages about 
> Iranians. I think that's why he did not write another book.
> 
> 


Back from a mighty walk.. Damn. My usenet time is resting time for me 
and charity for you maggot-heads :)

So Curzon opted to shut up! You know, shutting up rings a bell in me. It 
is one of the "attributes" I listed down as "secrecy" to discuss later 
in the blog after a few other attributes were touched, like Patience, 
Tact, Approach, Strategy, Objectivity, Timing, etc and etc. And I can 
say with high confidence that the attribute of secrecy really only 
exists in CH (Cro_magnon Human). MH (Modern Human) doesn't need it. But 
now that I stumbled on this attribute at this point in the blog I'll go 
ahead and throw some words about it.

Secrecy is an attribute, not function, of human analytics compartment of 
brain. It obviously is, by the way, the hallmark of a British man's 
character. The fucking creatures are even proud of this _defect_ in 
them!.. How's that for a sample of what a Modern Man thinks of you 
fucking Cro's?

Do I keep "secrets" from cats? Of course not. Cats keep secrets from me. 
I know CH limits in every direction in thought and behavior imaginable. 
And in any direction, any field, any thought, any behavior that I look, 
I see CH's limits in there. Jeff was saying I have nothing but CH 
defects in my mind; No it's just nothing about CH OTHER than those 
limits to notice! So don't fucking get me wrong here. I got a whole 
world other than CH to think and do and live, Jeff! The fucking CH isn't 
everything that there is :-)

So those limits make it absolutely pointless for MH to keep "secrets" 
from CH. MH doesn't even need to keep secrets from other MH, let alone 
the funky myopic and predictable CH around them. And as I said above, 
this attribute doesn't even exist inside MH. This Class in C++ doesn't 
need that attribute given to it.


Examples of that? Take Iran for instance. Iran is wide open to anybody 
and anything that moves! Come study us, fight us if you will, use us if 
you want, try to rule over us, "colonize" us :) Be the CH that you are 
as much as you wish. See what you'll get. You did all that and some 
among you know exactly what you got from it. We have no fear of anything 
in the world. "Secrets" are for you to keep, not us. Iran is still here 
potent as hell after 2700 years of written history alone!.. Think about 
that. This should give a hint even to a dimwit like you CH :) But I 
doubt even your "intelligence communities" can muster noticing its 
significance.

And it is not just Iran. Iran was only an example of this.

Consider American Natives now :) They and their lands were open for you 
to come in and be all the fucking CH in you that you could find in your 
fucking selves, right? Did you win? They're going to


Another example? Consider the comment Walker made after arrest for 
disclosing U.S. Navy secrets to Soviets. He didn't quite know what he 
was talking about; a "Jim Pennino" type of a person. A Birch Society 
kind of a fellow; i.e. limited as FUCK. But indirectly his comment was a 
Jewel of information for those who didn't know it already. He commented 
"Walmart has much better security than the Navy." :-) This was of course 
true. But why? THAT he didn't see, notice, or know. He couldn't 
comprehend that U.S. Navy didn't _need_ any security more than that :-) 
He didn't know how powerful Navy was as far as Soviets were concerned.

"Soviets" were like a joke to U.S. Navy..

And "Soviets" to U.S. Navy was like you funny CH to Iranians :) This is 
what I'm trying to say. Like cats are to me. We don't need to keep 
secrets from you. Nuclear weapons? Hehe :) Yes Iranians have many nukes 
that they first bought around 1990, and then studied and copied them and 
then manufactured them and then improved upon them significantly and 
then tested them (already in 1998! - people were feeling many many 
"earthquakes" that year originating always from the same spots under the 
mountains) and manufactured more and more of them. Iran keeps its nukes 
both inside its territories as well as in Turkey, in Israel, and in 
Pakestan. Why do you think Iran developed missiles that got even better 
than what Russians had? To deliver exactly what, right to the dimples on 
your chins? Not that easy for you to handle all that, is it. I don't 
know if any of the Indian nukes are actually Iranian owned or not, but 
India did test and develop them exactly when Shah was very active 
getting the same technology going together with Israel inside Iran in 
early to mid 1970s. Some among their arsenal also might be owned by Iran.

And the fact is that not _one_ of these nukes will be "utilized" by the 
wishes and directions of anyone other than the Iranians.

Was that "secret" enough for you two-bit Cro-Magnons?

Now tell me in August of 1953 was it you Americans who prepared the 
Iranian-army-dressed force inside your embassy in Tehran in total 
secrecy unknown from designers and commanders of the coup (all Iranians 
of course - you had no role in that operation whatsoever other than 
writing a check for part of the plan!), to get out _after_ the coup was 
successful for the sole purpose of killing Mosaddegh and his guards and 
military force outside his house, or was it the Brits who added them to 
the plan without disclosing it to their "allies" and too scared of 
consequences to use their own embassy grounds for it? Your mouths get 
shut, don't they! To this fucking day.

To this day, when someone points that to you, you go silent. Even after 
losing your embassy for it in 1980. Even after losing decades of 
profitable commerce with the most important country in the middle east, 
the only country indeed in the middle east. You _need_ to keep secrets 
when it comes to Iranians, don't you :)

I bet Curzon decided to shut up in early 1900s after seeing in India the 
same reality he'd seen in Iran earlier around 1890, and making the 
correct conclusion! Too late to do anything about his giant book on 
Iranians, it was already published a decade earlier. But never another 
one about Indians :-)

The British coward Cro's did try their best to keep this book from 
getting published again. 30 years ago when I looked into it there was 
only 5 copies of the book left in the entire world, the rest were 
silently destroyed. The 5 copies were just the ones in possession of 
authorities that they couldn't access or wouldn't destroy.

10 years ago I checked again, only 3 left. One right here in Dallas 
mighty SMU library special collections. Where you dump anything that you 
do not want you and others to see! It is the modern day Monastery 
collections of southern Europe when you Cros were still eating 
grasshoppers to live and Modern Human had been ravaged by Mongols.








-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834541

On 10/20/2021 1:16 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 10/20/2021 10:22 AM, Clutterfreak wrote:
>> On 10/19/2021 1:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
>>> Just saying "Cro-Magnon man is less endowed with analytical thinking 
>>> than Modern Human" is somewhat too general. A Cro might not even 
>>> understand what I'm pointing at. You can't make someone understand a 
>>> difference quite well if one party in that comparison is not even 
>>> quite accessible to him to see. He'd only conclude "that one's 
>>> different" and not what the difference exactly is between the two 
>>> parties in the comparison.
>>
>>
>> This is what Curzon did. This "top brain of the last two centuries" 
>> could only understand that Iranians were "different" from Cro-Magnons. 
>> But he couldn't describe the difference itself because he didn't know 
>> exactly what the difference was! He just kept giving examples and 
>> cases in Iranians that bewildered him and convinced him of _not_ 
>> knowing what they were. He could not discover how and why this human 
>> species was different, only "that one's different", as I said in last 
>> blog above.
>>
>> And this was from Britain's most intelligent man they'd seen in 2 
>> centuries.
>>
>> He didn't write another voluminous book about Indians unfortunately. 
>> If he had, you'd see the same bewilderment expressed there as well. 
>> Not too long after studying Iranians he became viceroy of India for 
>> about 6 years.
>>
>> My calculated guess is that he did see the same difference about 
>> Indians as well and suddenly discovered, as a result, that it is not 
>> Iranians and Indians and Chinese and ... that are different! That it 
>> was the Cro-Magnon people that were different from humanity in 
>> general! It must've been too depressing for him to articulate that 
>> discovery this time around, like he'd done so well in lengthy passages 
>> and pages about Iranians. I think that's why he did not write another 
>> book.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Back from a mighty walk.. Damn. My usenet time is resting time for me 
> and charity for you maggot-heads :)
> 
> So Curzon opted to shut up! You know, shutting up rings a bell in me. It 
> is one of the "attributes" I listed down as "secrecy" to discuss later 
> in the blog after a few other attributes were touched, like Patience, 
> Tact, Approach, Strategy, Objectivity, Timing, etc and etc. And I can 
> say with high confidence that the attribute of secrecy really only 
> exists in CH (Cro_magnon Human). MH (Modern Human) doesn't need it. But 
> now that I stumbled on this attribute at this point in the blog I'll go 
> ahead and throw some words about it.
> 
> Secrecy is an attribute, not function, of human analytics compartment of 
> brain. It obviously is, by the way, the hallmark of a British man's 
> character. The fucking creatures are even proud of this _defect_ in 
> them!.. How's that for a sample of what a Modern Man thinks of you 
> fucking Cro's?
> 
> Do I keep "secrets" from cats? Of course not. Cats keep secrets from me. 
> I know CH limits in every direction in thought and behavior imaginable. 
> And in any direction, any field, any thought, any behavior that I look, 
> I see CH's limits in there. Jeff was saying I have nothing but CH 
> defects in my mind; No it's just nothing about CH OTHER than those 
> limits to notice! So don't fucking get me wrong here. I got a whole 
> world other than CH to think and do and live, Jeff! The fucking CH isn't 
> everything that there is :-)
> 
> So those limits make it absolutely pointless for MH to keep "secrets" 
> from CH. MH doesn't even need to keep secrets from other MH, let alone 
> the funky myopic and predictable CH around them. And as I said above, 
> this attribute doesn't even exist inside MH. This Class in C++ doesn't 
> need that attribute given to it.
> 
> 
> Examples of that? Take Iran for instance. Iran is wide open to anybody 
> and anything that moves! Come study us, fight us if you will, use us if 
> you want, try to rule over us, "colonize" us :) Be the CH that you are 
> as much as you wish. See what you'll get. You did all that and some 
> among you know exactly what you got from it. We have no fear of anything 
> in the world. "Secrets" are for you to keep, not us. Iran is still here 
> potent as hell after 2700 years of written history alone!.. Think about 
> that. This should give a hint even to a dimwit like you CH :) But I 
> doubt even your "intelligence communities" can muster noticing its 
> significance.
> 
> And it is not just Iran. Iran was only an example of this.
> 
> Consider American Natives now :) They and their lands were open for you 
> to come in and be all the fucking CH in you that you could find in your 
> fucking selves, right? Did you win? They're going to
> 
> 
> Another example? Consider the comment Walker made after arrest for 
> disclosing U.S. Navy secrets to Soviets. He didn't quite know what he 
> was talking about; a "Jim Pennino" type of a person. A Birch Society 
> kind of a fellow; i.e. limited as FUCK. But indirectly his comment was a 
> Jewel of information for those who didn't know it already. He commented 
> "Walmart has much better security than the Navy." :-) This was of course 
> true. But why? THAT he didn't see, notice, or know. He couldn't 
> comprehend that U.S. Navy didn't _need_ any security more than that :-) 
> He didn't know how powerful Navy was as far as Soviets were concerned.
> 
> "Soviets" were like a joke to U.S. Navy..
> 
> And "Soviets" to U.S. Navy was like you funny CH to Iranians :) This is 
> what I'm trying to say. Like cats are to me. We don't need to keep 
> secrets from you. Nuclear weapons? Hehe :) Yes Iranians have many nukes 
> that they first bought around 1990, and then studied and copied them and 
> then manufactured them and then improved upon them significantly and 
> then tested them (already in 1998! - people were feeling many many 
> "earthquakes" that year originating always from the same spots under the 
> mountains) and manufactured more and more of them. Iran keeps its nukes 
> both inside its territories as well as in Turkey, in Israel, and in 
> Pakestan. Why do you think Iran developed missiles that got even better 
> than what Russians had? To deliver exactly what, right to the dimples on 
> your chins? Not that easy for you to handle all that, is it. I don't 
> know if any of the Indian nukes are actually Iranian owned or not, but 
> India did test and develop them exactly when Shah was very active 
> getting the same technology going together with Israel inside Iran in 
> early to mid 1970s. Some among their arsenal also might be owned by Iran.
> 
> And the fact is that not _one_ of these nukes will be "utilized" by the 
> wishes and directions of anyone other than the Iranians.
> 
> Was that "secret" enough for you two-bit Cro-Magnons?
> 
> Now tell me in August of 1953 was it you Americans who prepared the 
> Iranian-army-dressed force inside your embassy in Tehran in total 
> secrecy unknown from designers and commanders of the coup (all Iranians 
> of course - you had no role in that operation whatsoever other than 
> writing a check for part of the plan!), to get out _after_ the coup was 
> successful for the sole purpose of killing Mosaddegh and his guards and 
> military force outside his house, or was it the Brits who added them to 
> the plan without disclosing it to their "allies" and too scared of 
> consequences to use their own embassy grounds for it? Your mouths get 
> shut, don't they! To this fucking day.
> 
> To this day, when someone points that to you, you go silent. Even after 
> losing your embassy for it in 1980. Even after losing decades of 
> profitable commerce with the most important country in the middle east, 
> the only country indeed in the middle east. You _need_ to keep secrets 
> when it comes to Iranians, don't you :)
> 
> I bet Curzon decided to shut up in early 1900s after seeing in India the 
> same reality he'd seen in Iran earlier around 1890, and making the 
> correct conclusion! Too late to do anything about his giant book on 
> Iranians, it was already published a decade earlier. But never another 
> one about Indians :-)
> 
> The British coward Cro's did try their best to keep this book from 
> getting published again. 30 years ago when I looked into it there was 
> only 5 copies of the book left in the entire world, the rest were 
> silently destroyed. The 5 copies were just the ones in possession of 
> authorities that they couldn't access or wouldn't destroy.
> 
> 10 years ago I checked again, only 3 left. One right here in Dallas 
> mighty SMU library special collections. Where you dump anything that you 
> do not want you and others to see! It is the modern day Monastery 
> collections of southern Europe when you Cros were still eating 
> grasshoppers to live and Modern Human had been ravaged by Mongols.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Ok back to "secrets" to just finish that blog subject.

Cats keep secrets from human. No amount of love I gave and give to cats 
has stopped them from keeping secrets from me. It's part of what they 
are in the presence of what I am. No amount of "Sahib!.. Sahib!.. 
Hansonji!.." by Indians would warrant a disclosure of the secret Curzon 
was holding from them. It's part of what CH is, just like cats and 
human. You don't disclose your secrets to a species superior to you in 
analytics compartment. Superior in size? No problem. Superior in fight? 
No problem. A rattlesnake fights me one to one better than I can fight 
back, but I have no "secrets" to keep from the rattlesnake. Same with 
bears, tigers, etc. But superior in analytical thinking? No way, I'd 
have to keep secrets from those creatures. That's why CH keeps secrets 
from MH. Period.


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834551

On 10/20/2021 1:16 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> Consider American Natives now :) They and their lands were open for you 
> to come in and be all the fucking CH in you that you could find in your 
> fucking selves, right? Did you win? They're going to


I had to leave at that moment. Then I came back and was under the 
impression this post was ready to go. Sorry.

I think American Natives (Hispanics and all) will get their land and 
country back from you CH. But not necessarily in a friendly manner :) I 
don't know how bad it will get for you. But I am certain they will get 
this land back from you and you'd have to leave! Go where? To where 
people are closest to you genetically and evolution-wise. Africa.

You will live in Africa under the peril that African man's dick poses 
for your existence. You'll eventually get totally combined with them and 
turn into workforce people for MH around the world where workforce was 
needed.

It won't be, yet, your end. As time passes you'll get fewer and fewer in 
number compared to those endowed with better analytical thinking 
compartments.

2020 census indicated that your numbers have begun to go down, so this 
process has started. Black's numbers went slightly up but 
percentage-wise theirs declined as well.

This is what I was going to say in this example.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834598

On 10/19/2021 1:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> Example 2. Junkies (almost exclusively CH and Black) weren't able to 
> substitute for what they didn't have at some point, either in their 
> surroundings or within themselves. They failed to find something as 
> effective as what they didn't have anymore to continue their lives 
> undisturbed. MH _always_ finds a substitute as effective as what he lost 
> in his life. So we don't see MH junkies in areas where both MH and CH 
> live side by side.



In this example of substitution as one of the functions of analytics 
compartments of brain (or lack there of) I showed that this by itself 
could explain the stark evidence seen in demography of Junkies in USA 
today. I say "today" because I consider the detrimental effects of Covid 
on general people's lives significant enough to show who among people in 
an out of ordinary situation will begin to lose control of their lives 
first.

Both examples 1 and 2 showed the effect of insufficient ability for (or 
outright lack of) substituting. How about an example of how _having_ 
that ability works? Here's one from my own life:

Example 3. In late 1990s I developed (as was expected - genetically 
prone) a severe case of diabetes in a matter of just two weeks. After 
everything that needed to be done was done, my doctor told me of course 
that I needed to also exercise daily. But I was and am not a man of 
doing idiotic movements. When I move at all I need a purpose better than 
long term benefits of exercise to do that move.

Can you make a cat exercise? I was like that! To me exercise was and is 
for idiots.

Of course I had no qualms for exerting myself physically for something 
that demanded it, so don't get me wrong.

So I "substituted" for everything that now needed to change in my life, 
except for exercise. And severe cases of diabetes doesn't like that. Two 
years later, after numerous advice, tests, and more advice from my 
doctor I still would not exercise. Then my doctor made it clear that for 
my case of diabetes that now was two years into it, I only had just 
another two years before my organs would start diminishing in functions; 
i.e., the beginning of the end. I asked him "How do you know that for 
sure?" He said "It happens ALL THE TIME with my diabetic patients who 
lead sedentary lives."

That made me realize something was needed to be done. But what? I asked 
this last question from my doctor. He said "If you are hell bent on not 
exercising then you need to change your job to one that makes you be 
physically active most of the working day." Bingo! There was a solution 
after all.. Half of my fear disappeared, but prospect of losing my nice 
job (desk job) and getting a manual job haunted me a few days. But 
within that same week I gathered my guts together and quit my position 
(to the astonishment of my colleagues) and got myself a warehouse job. I 
substituted, when a change in most important part of my life was overall 
advantageous. This is what an MH can do. All Mexicans, Iranians, 
Indians, Chinese, Vietnames, etc are capable of making such changes. But 
among CH that's not necessarily the case; Hence the stark scenes in 
Philadelphia's "Kensington" avenue.

Result? I'm still here! I'd be dead about 4 years after doctor told me 
to change my job, if I wouldn't or couldn't let my nice job go.

Substitution alone saved me!

In the example of the Junkies there could of course be other reasons 
than just lack of substitution involved. But I think I'll cover some of 
them later when I talk about other functions and attributes, cause _all_ 
such reasons have to do with analytics compartments as well!




-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834611

On 10/21/2021 3:19 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 10/19/2021 1:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
>> Example 2. Junkies (almost exclusively CH and Black) weren't able to 
>> substitute for what they didn't have at some point, either in their 
>> surroundings or within themselves. They failed to find something as 
>> effective as what they didn't have anymore to continue their lives 
>> undisturbed. MH _always_ finds a substitute as effective as what he 
>> lost in his life. So we don't see MH junkies in areas where both MH 
>> and CH live side by side.
> 
> 
> 
> In this example of substitution as one of the functions of analytics 
> compartments of brain (or lack there of) I showed that this by itself 
> could explain the stark evidence seen in demography of Junkies in USA 
> today. I say "today" because I consider the detrimental effects of Covid 
> on general people's lives significant enough to show who among people in 
> an out of ordinary situation will begin to lose control of their lives 
> first.
> 
> Both examples 1 and 2 showed the effect of insufficient ability for (or 
> outright lack of) substituting. How about an example of how _having_ 
> that ability works? Here's one from my own life:
> 
> Example 3. In late 1990s I developed (as was expected - genetically 
> prone) a severe case of diabetes in a matter of just two weeks. After 
> everything that needed to be done was done, my doctor told me of course 
> that I needed to also exercise daily. But I was and am not a man of 
> doing idiotic movements. When I move at all I need a purpose better than 
> long term benefits of exercise to do that move.
> 
> Can you make a cat exercise? I was like that! To me exercise was and is 
> for idiots.
> 
> Of course I had no qualms for exerting myself physically for something 
> that demanded it, so don't get me wrong.
> 
> So I "substituted" for everything that now needed to change in my life, 
> except for exercise. And severe cases of diabetes doesn't like that. Two 
> years later, after numerous advice, tests, and more advice from my 
> doctor I still would not exercise. Then my doctor made it clear that for 
> my case of diabetes that now was two years into it, I only had just 
> another two years before my organs would start diminishing in functions; 
> i.e., the beginning of the end. I asked him "How do you know that for 
> sure?" He said "It happens ALL THE TIME with my diabetic patients who 
> lead sedentary lives."
> 
> That made me realize something was needed to be done. But what? I asked 
> this last question from my doctor. He said "If you are hell bent on not 
> exercising then you need to change your job to one that makes you be 
> physically active most of the working day." Bingo! There was a solution 
> after all.. Half of my fear disappeared, but prospect of losing my nice 
> job (desk job) and getting a manual job haunted me a few days. But 
> within that same week I gathered my guts together and quit my position 
> (to the astonishment of my colleagues) and got myself a warehouse job. I 
> substituted, when a change in most important part of my life was overall 
> advantageous. This is what an MH can do. All Mexicans, Iranians, 
> Indians, Chinese, Vietnames, etc are capable of making such changes. But 
> among CH that's not necessarily the case; Hence the stark scenes in 
> Philadelphia's "Kensington" avenue.
> 
> Result? I'm still here! I'd be dead about 4 years after doctor told me 
> to change my job, if I wouldn't or couldn't let my nice job go.
> 
> Substitution alone saved me!
> 
> In the example of the Junkies there could of course be other reasons 
> than just lack of substitution involved. But I think I'll cover some of 
> them later when I talk about other functions and attributes, cause _all_ 
> such reasons have to do with analytics compartments as well!
> 
> 
> 
> 


Example 4. Martin Luther's admittance of CH shortcomings and begging to 
still be considered "Christian" even after all that "sin" that had to be 
committed by CH!.. This is a stark example of inability for 
substitution. Instead of substituting for their "sins" (i.e. limits) 
from among a whole repertoire of powerful and advanced options still 
remaining in Christianity, CH went for changing Christianity itself! 
Isn't that similar to what a Junkie does? Junkie opts to damage himself 
as long as the result is a removal of the pain that surrounding and life 
is inflicting on him. Instead of changing his life to handle new 
situations he damages himself to prevent feeling the new situations.

Christianity itself, was an earlier damage inflicted on Mithraism that 
Jesus introduced. But at the time of Luther it still carried some 
remnants of the wisdom in what it was before. Even that modified and 
corrupted form of the wonderful thought and worldview MH had created was 
too much for CH.

Face it you morons. This is serious.

MH substitutes when a vital element of life is crushed and gone or is 
taken away from him. He does that also when results of the substitution 
are advantageous to his earlier but present resources.

Example 5. Which ones of you CH morons ever went to China to live your 
lives? Or to Russia. Or to India. Japan, even Britain. Anywhere other 
than your "group"- surroundings? You think you didn't do that because 
life itself would be harder for you there? I don't think so! You didn't 
do that because CH doesn't have the courage, determination, the 
substituting "function", that's required to do so. That's the reason.

Southern Italians a couple of years ago began selling their empty houses 
for one U.S. dollar to Americans. Their long term nice plans for their 
communities had this measure incorporated in it. No CH ever made that 
change. The houses are still empty.

Example 6. Again from my own life. I had a comfortable worry-free 
wonderful life in Iran. Full of adventure and activity as well as 
opportunities despite all the trouble that thieves of greatest ranks 
were creating for Iranians, yes those who had "U.S. embassy" backing 
them. My friends who stayed in Iran are now billionaires. You think I 
came to USA because life was easier here? You're wrong. I had the 
courage for doing and experiencing what I was curious about. I wasn't 
curious about USA, mind you. I still am not. I was curious about 
physics. And USA was (and still is, they tell me) the best country in 
the world to study physics in. I could substitute even an unfriendly 
country for my loving country! I could substitute a half-Neanderthal 
chewed up Persian language that you CH call "English" for my wonderful 
mighty and powerful and potent Persian language. I could substitute a 
life that resembled living on the surface of the Moon to me, for the 
comfortable life that I'd have if I had stayed in Iran.

I could substitute. That's why I'm here. You CH cannot substitute, 
that's why you never leave your Mom's country of living for another 
country on earth to live your lives.

America was discovered by the MH, and only then you CH got eager to move 
over so you'd have a chance against them in Europe! In the absence of 
the Spaniards (read descendants of Iranians who ruled Spain after Islam 
conquest of that part in Europe) you wouldn't have the courage to come 
and actually live in America. The name "America" itself is after an MH 
person's surname.


Ok, got to go walking.


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834682

On 10/22/2021 9:53 AM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> 
> 
> 



Continuing on function of substitution:

Example 7. Crypto instead of dollar. Your dollars lost buying power by 
4% just since a month back. My crypto assets gained 13% in the same period.

Afghans who converted their dollars to crypto not only saved all their 
money, they gained 30% more than what they initially put in. Some other 
Afghans who trusted AUDS financial systems lost _all_ their dollars to 
those crooks with one stroke of a pen following U.S. withdrawal from 
Afghanestan.

It requires courage, wisdom, and possessing the function of substitution 
in yourself to be able to change your dollar assets to crypto. MH can do 
that, CH has trouble doing it. Too scary for CH.

Dollar will lose buying power for the rest of this year and throughout 
next year while other waves Covid set off are one by one arriving. But 
it won't help if you are CH :) You'll keep your dollars and lose buying 
power regardless. A "Jim Pennino" type of human must conform. It's a 
group thing.

Example 8. Writing. MH substituted one-to-one transfer of information 
with hieroglyphics of tiny shapes and images so he wouldn't have to be 
present when transfer was taking place. Thus writing began. EVERY MH 
people around the world did that! Soon after, MH replaced the 
hieroglyphics with imprints for each individual sound made by human! 
Imagine the creativity involved. Now he wasn't limited with putting down 
concepts only. He could write anything that he could say. So alphabet 
was created.

MH did all that 5000 years back; i.e., as soon as the change to it was 
advantageous to them. CH never did such a thing in its history.

CH, in fact, didn't do that until 13th century with the help of MH in 
southern Europe churches. They had killed off a thousand years earlier 
the MH touch they experienced in Greece and Rome and had become pure 
CH-level people. So one thousand years had to pass until MH from south, 
via Church establishments, would bring that MH practice back to these 
savages.

Many CH nations in Europe didn't have a written language whatsoever 
before (and some of them centuries after) that. MH wanted Bible be 
accessible to CH in Europe. That's why CH got to have a written 
language. Left to themselves they'd still be just blabbering to each 
other to transfer information like in some African tribes.

The first English dictionary written was in 1700's! Go figure. We MH, 
have dictionaries that 2500 years ago were still old books. Scientists 
don't quite know how long before that these dictionaries existed. And 
I'm speaking of the same language! The same language spoken by MH 
developed all such advances, yet spoken by CH in Europe caused 1000 
years of Dark Ages and setback until Church arrived to kick ass, run by 
the MH.


Time to go for a walk. Take some fentanyl to feel proud of what you are. 
Until I get another chance at it, suckers.





-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835794

On 10/19/2021 1:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> 
>>
> 
> 
> 
> Just saying "Cro-Magnon man is less endowed with analytical thinking 
> than Modern Human" is somewhat too general. A Cro might not even 
> understand what I'm pointing at. You can't make someone understand a 
> difference quite well if one party in that comparison is not even quite 
> accessible to him to see. He'd only conclude "that one's different" and 
> not what the difference exactly is between the two parties in the 
> comparison. So better I break it down into more detail if I expect that 
> some feeble-minded Cro will one day get the courage to read these lines.
> 
> Analytical thinking (just like an "object" or "class" in C++ programming 
> language) has a few very important "functions" as well as a few very 
> important "attributes." This applies to both Cros and modern humans of 
> course.
> 
> But that compartment ("class" or "object" in C++) in modern humans 
> contains a few more functions and some very different attributes from 
> those in Cros. I don't need to go over the functions and attributes that 
> are shared in both species; all I need is to explain those functions and 
> attributes that are either different between the two species or are 
> totally missing in one.
> 
> So here it is as I see it and have thought about it. I will first start 
> with the function of Substitution in our analytical compartments.
> 
> Modern Human (MH) can substitute! He does it much better than a 
> cro-magnon human (CH) can. When an important resource for living is 
> taken away from MH or is no longer available to him, he will 
> successfully _substitute_ for it! CH doesn't and cannot do that as well 
> as MH, therefore will begin suffering endlessly from the lack of that 
> resource.
> 
> Example 1. Typically when a CH is fired from his job he gets into an 
> extended course of depression that takes months or sometimes years to 
> recover from. Even in the presence of news media they show the pink slip 
> to reporters while they're crying.. . I've seen it several times both 
> during years that I watched TV and in my own surroundings and in between 
> various colleagues. It is harder for a CH to substitute for the lost job.
> 
> Example 2. Junkies (almost exclusively CH and Black) weren't able to 
> substitute for what they didn't have at some point, either in their 
> surroundings or within themselves. They failed to find something as 
> effective as what they didn't have anymore to continue their lives 
> undisturbed. MH _always_ finds a substitute as effective as what he lost 
> in his life. So we don't see MH junkies in areas where both MH and CH 
> live side by side.
> 
> Substitution isn't done only as a result of losing something. It is 
> employed also in cases that a better resource becomes available! I.e. in 
> cases that a _change_ of resource would be beneficial. It is harder for 
> a CH to change that resource while he still has it. His deeply rooted 
> group-thinking is in the way, conforming with the rest of the group and 
> staying with same resource even if he recognizes the superiority of the 
> other resource.
> 
> This function is extremely important. If you think about it, we got here 
> by substituting one idea with another better one. We used to huff and 
> grunt, didn't we. But we substituted it with words! We substituted tools 
> for what we couldn't do with our fingers and muscles alone. You get the 
> idea. MH has this ability in him much more than a CH does. There are 
> hardly any CH that learns a foreign language or two. But you see 
> millions and millions of other MH who know one or more foreign languages 
> in addition to their mother tongues. etc and etc. Examples are plenty.
> 
> We substituted huge stores of goods and trade material with currency. 
> Yes it was MH that did it first.
> 
> Once at one end of a warehouse I and a Cro and a Mexican found ourselves 
> having to cut some tough strips fast and none had a knife with us. It 
> was a working holiday and staff everywhere was at the minimum but line 
> was working. The Cro attempted to solve the problem by running towards 
> the other end of the warehouse to get his knife. That "other end" was at 
> least half a mile away! But a line was waiting for us to start moving 
> and each minute cost the company several thousand dollars... I, instead, 
> quickly got busy cutting the strip with my portable tiny can opener (you 
> may have seen them in military - it's got a tiny little blade) which was 
> hanging from my keychain. The Mexican, on the other hand, climbed a 
> column up like a monkey and got to the light bulb, unscrewed it and 
> dropped it to the ground. Then jumped down and used what was left of it 
> as an unbelievably sharp and effective knife! ... I was dumbfounded by 
> his quick action. I think it was a nice example of substituting for 
> something that was not accessible.
> 
> In my next blog I'll write about another function in analytical thinking 
> that you don't see much of among CH, namely, Solving the Right Problem! 
> :-) Hehe :)
> 
> 


Ok, back to this spot in the blog.


example 5 (of STRP): Solving the Mongols issue after defeat


Mongols couldn't wipe out Iranians from the face of the Earth of course. 
They _would_ wipe out CH if they had continued west. I know the CH 
features and am 100% sure Mongols would not let even one individual CH 
to stay alive after noticing what CH is.

Iran, China, and three major civilizations located between China and 
Iran (Uygurs, Turkics, etc) all totally fell to Mongols' control as far 
as administration was concerned, but the damage had in such cases been 
limited to erasing every form of civilization and life from the paths of 
the moving cities' only, and these paths for a few years zigzagged 
inside the occupied regions until its nature dissolved into something else.

What happened was that after resistance to Mongols ceased, the issue of 
administration of huge countries came up, something about which Mongols 
had no experience, but were all very eager to learn! They were MH after 
all and carried with them large populations of the best of every 
civilization they had previously conquered, all MH.

With more enthusiasm than the Chinese and Iranians themselves, these 
mongols immediately started to learn the languages, science, art, 
literature, and the tech that still remained. Very quickly, in just one 
generation, their descendants had totally been absorbed and assimilated 
in the local MH cultures. In China Mongols became just like best Chinese 
people, in Iran they became just as best Iranians were. Later, when they 
entered India (very differently this time around from how they'd invaded 
earlier regions) they immediately became Indians, Hindus, Buddhists and 
Moslems alike.

This important total transformation which saved the rest of Europe and 
India was the results of two core features in the MH. The ability to 
_change_for_better (Substitution) on the Mongols side, and the ability 
to STRP on the Chinese and Iranians' part. Iranians had found the real 
problem with Mongols and solved it almost immediately after defeat.

Chengiz's own grandson has a book of poems in Persian :) One other 
grandson sensed that the onslaught may have threatened the existence of 
Hafez' poems and diligently conducted a campaign of finding all pieces 
and parts of that book which now was scattered all over Iran, and 
collected them nicely in one book arranged alphabetically by how each 
verse ended, and many many copies of it were ordered made. That's how we 
now have this amazing creation.

A thousand years from now, 10 thousand years from now, we may not have 
any of today's works of literature in CH languages around anymore (heck 
even Hemingway is unheard of by today's young generation - just half a 
century after), but we will certainly be still reading Hafez in Persian 
at least on a weekly basis :-) And we _will_ understand every word of 
it, because this masterpiece (among others, like that of Ferdowsi's and 
Molavi's) doesn't let Persian language degrade.

English will be degraded to I don't know what by 10 thousand years 
later. Already in past 40 years it has suffered to some extent. The 
English with which news articles are written is a telltale of that. I'd 
say in even 1000 years from now nobody will either look like CH or speak 
like CH anymore. But Persian? Hindu? Chinese? They will be right here 
spoken and written and taught and thought because they are supported by 
great works of MH literature.

Your Sheykhzabeer's (Shakespeare!) is too weak to support your fucking 
language! His works will wither and get dumped to where they belong, in 
the dustbin of CH history, despite themselves being nothing but crude 
imitations of MH works of literature made by the north African Arab 
Sheykh Zabeer, some MH who'd gone to Europe. One who had knowledge of 
such works from East inside MH nations.

I read a paper, a scholarly journal paper, 10's of years back in which 
somebody had compared works of Shakespeare to their equivalent often 
very similar works of literature known to Iranians and Indians and the 
Chinese from centuries back, before Shakespeare's time. The correlation 
was amazingly clear. Sheykh Zabeer knew what he was doing. In art and 
literature that's not considered plagiarism, but at least rest assured 
that CH didn't create them originally.

In short, when present CH disappears as an earlier form of human for the 
second time around (i.e. from the end of the one before last ice age), 
his substandard languages themselves will disappear together with them. 
"Indo-European" will become just "Indo-Iranian" as it has always been 
despite CH fear based group tendency bullshit.

CH _and_ languages the speak are on the way out.

I've discussed so far:

Analytics Compartment Of Brain (ACOB):
-------------------------------------

* functions:

   - Substitution
     Example 1: CH getting fired means "calamity"
     Example 2: demography of junkies is almost pure CH
     Example 3: meaningful physical activity vs idiotic movements
     Example 4: Martin Luther's 2nd downgrading of Christianity to fit CH
     Example 5: CH difficulty to emigre
     Example 6: my moving to USA
     Example 7: from dollar to cryptocurrency
     Example 8: MH invention of writing
     Example 9: destroying Greek MH advances
     Example 10: Dark Ages: Descend to CH earlier human's roots
     Example 11: Christianity's 1st downgrading of Mithraism to fit CH
     Example 12: Inability to leave CH group despite free houses
     Example 13: CH settlement in America only after European MH settled
     Example 14: Adoption of Islam


   - Solving The Right Problem (STRP)
     Example 1: war instead of trade
     Example 2: Roman Empire issue
     Example 3: Russian Empire issue
     Example 4: War with Mongols entailing STRP on both sides
     Example 5: Solving the Mongols issue after defeat

* attributes:
   - Secrecy
     Example 1: Curzon's silence on Indians
     Example 2: Iran's open doors
     Example 3: American Natives open doors
     Example 4: U.S. Navy's open doors
     Example 5: U.S. embassy in Tehran, August 1953
     Example 6: destroying original "Persia and the Persian Question"
     Example 7: modern day hidden Monastery collections


Next I may continue with the third ACOB function of "Seeking the 
Positive First" :-) Or I may give some more examples of _inability_ in 
CH rather than examples of abilities among MH. I don't know it yet.













-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835892

On 11/15/2021 12:24 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> I've discussed so far:
> 
> Analytics Compartment Of Brain (ACOB):
> -------------------------------------
> 
> * functions:
> 
>    - Substitution
>      Example 1: CH getting fired means "calamity"
>      Example 2: demography of junkies is almost pure CH
>      Example 3: meaningful physical activity vs idiotic movements
>      Example 4: Martin Luther's 2nd downgrading of Christianity to fit CH
>      Example 5: CH difficulty to emigre
>      Example 6: my moving to USA
>      Example 7: from dollar to cryptocurrency
>      Example 8: MH invention of writing
>      Example 9: destroying Greek MH advances
>      Example 10: Dark Ages: Descend to CH earlier human's roots
>      Example 11: Christianity's 1st downgrading of Mithraism to fit CH
>      Example 12: Inability to leave CH group despite free houses
>      Example 13: CH settlement in America only after European MH settled
>      Example 14: Adoption of Islam
>      Example 15: Mongols' adoption of cultures superior to theirs
> 
>    - Solving The Right Problem (STRP)
>      Example 1: war instead of trade
>      Example 2: Roman Empire issue
>      Example 3: Russian Empire issue
>      Example 4: War with Mongols entailing STRP on both sides
>      Example 5: Solving the Mongols issue after defeat
> 
> * attributes:
>    - Secrecy
>      Example 1: Curzon's silence on Indians
>      Example 2: Iran's open doors
>      Example 3: American Natives open doors
>      Example 4: U.S. Navy's open doors
>      Example 5: U.S. embassy in Tehran, August 1953
>      Example 6: destroying original "Persia and the Persian Question"
>      Example 7: modern day hidden Monastery collections
> 
> 
> Next I may continue with the third ACOB function of "Seeking the 
> Positive First" :-) Or I may give some more examples of _inability_ in 
> CH rather than examples of abilities among MH. I don't know it yet.


What I've discussed so far can be seen above. Now the examples of cases 
showing CH inability in function of STRP.

Example 6:  Hitler vs Jews

Anything Hitler did regarding other CH in and around Germany was typical 
of any other CH throughout history of CH. But regarding the MH in (and 
around) Germany he was intent for the first time on finding the 
("final") solution! He really wanted to "solve" that issue :) Hehe :) 
Ok, let's then see how this CH tackled and "solved" it. In other words, 
let's see what you CH reading this blog _are_ regarding a problem like 
that. You're no different from Hitler!

Hitler was not stupid. He was a normal CH. In many ways an exemplary one 
indeed. He was smart and dedicated. He listened to what majority of CH 
felt and wanted and thrived for around him. What the majority wanted was 
what he wanted. He got _voted_ into dictatorial power in fact.

But he was also a CH with all its limitations compared to an MH. He 
hated communism because he understood it loud and clear and knew it was 
just Jew's attempt to inflict harm on Europeans, on the CH, to get even 
with them. Jews wanted to harm the CH because CH had harmed them any 
chance they'd gotten for more than a thousand years.

So from the moment that Hitler understood what communism was made for 
(i.e. a couple of years before WWI) he actively engaged himself to fight 
them inside Germany. These communists were naturally almost all Jewish. 
Just about every one of them. A non-Jew appearing among them was a rare 
exception.

Then he got more serious in his activities and began participating in 
street rallies promoting firm resistance against communists. In a few of 
these rallies he got badly assaulted and physically beaten up by 
communists; he never forgot such incidents.

But it wasn't just the communists that he hated. He hated any CH or MH 
who opposed his own collective group of "Germans." If Brits happened to 
also be CH he didn't give the slightest damn, same with French or 
Russians, Poles, etc. It was only his own "group" that mattered to him. 
A signature CH behavior and mindset.

There was not yet a solid entity in the form of "communists" with a 
location and an army and a country that you could go to war with, so 
this matter, this "problem" of communism had to wait for the time being. 
But there were plenty of nations, CH or MH didn't matter, that opposed 
German people's wishes, especially in colonizing other areas of the 
globe as many other CH nations had done. These opposing people had 
countries and military forces to go to war against! What a wonderful 
possibility if any of these wars could actually happen.

Hitler in his book (mein kampf) clearly describes what he felt and did 
when the news of the start of WWI reached him. He thanked God for it a 
thousand times and immediately joined the military to go participate in it.

His participation was so dedicated that he could get a few medals that 
corporals had never gotten before. These medals were for military 
personnel much higher up than a corporal. Yet his service was exemplary 
that even as a corporal he was able to get awarded such.

After German defeat in WWI and harsh limitations that the winners had 
placed on Germans, two new situations had come about; the necessity to 
begin systematic political advance instead of just street rallies, and 
the fact that now communism had a country, a place and location, like a 
sitting dock!

This was what Hitler was all about. The rest of what happened is known 
history with many people. But the part of which that entails his 
"solution" to the Jewish problem is what this example is about.

In a nutshell, he found the solution that just about any CH entity had 
found for the Jews in their entire history. Destroy them! This was 
nothing new at all. It was happening in small scales any place across CH 
regions any single time the opportunity had come.

Religious leaders of CH themselves promoted doing that to Jews. Martin 
Luther's famous 7 step directive in dealing with Jews sums it all:

" Step One:   Burn their schools and then burn their Churches!

   Step Two:   Then go burn the places they live at!

   Step Three: Confiscate ALL their Jewish texts and books and treatises

   Step Four:  Cut the limbs of Jewish priest who continue teaching, 
then  kill them if that didn't stop them!

   Step Five:  Attack any Jew if you saw them traveling in our country!

   Step Six:   Take away all their gold and silver, do not let them loan 
money to people!

   Step Seven: Have the young healthy Jews do all your menial work!"

This is the "solution" that this CH German, Luther the "reformer", had 
come up with regarding the problem of MH living among them. It was 
offered not that long ago too! It came out and began getting practiced 
in 16th century everywhere among CH.

When you study these 7 steps, it is clear that it is made to mask a 
fear; the fear which MH's advanced features inflict on the CH.

It is what cats sometimes feel toward humans. It is what an earlier form 
of human feels about a Modern Human today!

Hitler had almost identical feelings toward Jews and in many ways acted 
on these same 7 step directives.

MH confronted with any "Jewish problem" if it existed at all, would 
successfully find the correct solution of coexistence with Jews. All 
over the world Jews among MH have coexisted successfully except inside 
CH areas. The "conflict" Israel has with Palestinians is 99% politics to 
fool the CH in USA and Europe (to fill the role of, thus preventing CH 
attempts for newer crusades).

What does this all tell you? It tells me that CH is often incapable of 
Solving The Right Problem. STRP is not a function that's doing its job 
right inside them. In the above case, Luther, instead of solving the 
problem of Jews solved the issue of his fears instead. All he achieved 
was masking his fears, and called it the solution to that problem.

Same with Hitler. Confronted with better humans, newer and more capable 
than him and his ilk, he goes for eliminating the problem itself rather 
than solving it.  His "final solution" is so similar to Luther's 7 step 
directives. Both coming from same source, same type of human, the 
earlier form of human!












-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#836009

On 11/16/2021 2:53 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 11/15/2021 12:24 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
>> I've discussed so far:
>>
>> Analytics Compartment Of Brain (ACOB):
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>> * functions:
>>
>>    - Substitution
>>      Example 1: CH getting fired means "calamity"
>>      Example 2: demography of junkies is almost pure CH
>>      Example 3: meaningful physical activity vs idiotic movements
>>      Example 4: Martin Luther's 2nd downgrading of Christianity to fit CH
>>      Example 5: CH difficulty to emigre
>>      Example 6: my moving to USA
>>      Example 7: from dollar to cryptocurrency
>>      Example 8: MH invention of writing
>>      Example 9: destroying Greek MH advances
>>      Example 10: Dark Ages: Descend to CH earlier human's roots
>>      Example 11: Christianity's 1st downgrading of Mithraism to fit CH
>>      Example 12: Inability to leave CH group despite free houses offered
>>      Example 13: CH settlement in America only after European MH settled
>>      Example 14: Adoption of Islam
>>      Example 15: Mongols' adoption of cultures superior to theirs
>>
>>    - Solving The Right Problem (STRP)
>>      Example 1: war instead of trade
>>      Example 2: Roman Empire issue
>>      Example 3: Russian Empire issue
>>      Example 4: War with Mongols entailing STRP on both sides
>>      Example 5: Solving the Mongols issue after defeat 
>>      Example 6: Hitler vs Jews
>>      Example 7: Martin Luther vs Jews
>>      Example 8: Islam entailing STRP for many problems
>>      Example 9: Polygamy as legal and moral practice
>>      Example 10: Matter of gender exceptions
>>
>> * attributes:
>>    - Secrecy
>>      Example 1: Curzon's silence on Indians
>>      Example 2: Iran's open doors
>>      Example 3: American Natives open doors
>>      Example 4: U.S. Navy's open doors
>>      Example 5: U.S. embassy in Tehran, August 1953
>>      Example 6: destroying original "Persia and the Persian Question"
>>      Example 7: modern day hidden Monastery collections

>> 


Example 8: Islam as a case of STRP

I discussed Islam earlier as a case of Substitution function in the 
sense of ability to change for the better. But it is also a great 
example of STRP function. It was a _solution_, after all, to a set of 
very complicated problems that neither Zoroastrianism could meet, nor 
Christianity (downgraded Mithraism) or Judaism would. Islam solved "the 
right problem" in every case of those issues :)

Islam was an MH made religion after all. Of course so was Judaism and 
Christianity, but times had changed and MH needed something better than 
what helped people in a totally different lifestyle an era earlier.

Islam (for its time) was STRP from begin to end.

Now a nice point to pay attention to: When more than a thousand years 
passes and CH today still cannot see all that wisdom in that amazing 
changes in the way of life those people adopted, then this feat of 
creation and advancement must've been something requiring crossing the 
_species_, isn't it. CH is indeed not MH!

How long more would've helped, another thousand years? Hehe :) CH simply 
doesn't get it. They don't grasp what took place and what problems were 
correctly solved in Islam.

Here I give an Example of such problems that were addressed head on and 
successfully solved.


Example 9: Practice of Polygamy when due

Doesn't even the term "polygamy" scare the CH away? :-) Dogmas right? 
Yes, stupid dogmas that only form inside CH population. CH frowns upon 
it and discards it as the correct solution to the often ridiculously 
artificial and meaningless relationships that forms between husbands and 
wives.

One man with multiple wives (and _not_ vice versa) has evolutionary 
factors supporting it. I explained that in another branch of this same 
blog tree under corrolary number 13 resulting from two basic laws of 
evolution for man and woman. You can go over to that branch and read 
them, or I'll briefly go over it here in what pertains polygamy.

First off, polygamy is not the exception in man-woman relationship, but 
the rule! Monogamy has got problems with it. Most divorces are taking 
place because neither CH nor MH is made for monogamy as far as evolution 
is concerned. Women seek men of better ACOB and not every woman gets 
lucky enough to find one. So when one is found more than one woman can 
benefit from it, and indeed that's how human got better and better 
advanced compared to what it was before. That's how we evolved! Polygamy 
makes the advancement much faster by providing greater progenies of same 
man with superior ACOB.

Imagine Feynman had a legal and moral harem of say 20 women instead of 
just one. With just one woman he created a progeny of 2. These two 
children by now probably have created 4 humans which still are endowed 
with better ACOB than average MH. But with 20 women in his harem Feynman 
would make 40 children and these children by now would have 80 children 
of superior ACOB. Compare 4 against 80, coming about in just two 
generations. A hundred or two hundred years from now the difference 
between the two cases would be staggering. That's how we evolved so 
efficiently from apes! Polygamy did it.

This important fact was studied and adopted in Islam exactly 1400 years 
back, and yet CH today don't even dare to go there. They can't even 
speak of it. They have dogmas to adhere and follow.

What was the real problem to solve? The actual problem? The "right" 
problem"? Real problem was and is that monogamy does not address the 
true nature of man-woman relationship. MH recognized the right problem 
and solved it head on. For CH even the existence of that right problem 
violated their dogmas, so they just ignored it and instead chose to 
address an entire set of problems that comes up in a monogamous 
marriage! Hehe :)

I.e., CH stayed _stuck_ with never ending consequences of monogamous 
marriages to this day, while MH solved it 1400 years back and moved on! 
That's how different we are.

Another example.

Example 10: Matter of gender exceptions


Under Islam's regulations, a wife who's part (or fully) lesbian can 
legally and morally bring in her lesbian friends into the marriage with 
her husband and thus form a much happier larger and stronger family than 
she could ever have single-handedly with her husband. If that's not what 
the woman desires and cannot stand men at all, then she'd find a man 
with gender issues (i.e. mentally a woman) and would make either a 
monogamous relationship with him or shares him with all her other 
lesbian women, all, again, legally and morally married.

How does CH handle this matter? A whole fucking mess, right? Same 
mistakes, same approaches, same species! When deprived of tackling the 
real issue here, CH has had to make man-to-man and woman-to-woman 
marriages legal and moral, thus depriving the progeny from growing in an 
environment that at least addresses the minimal required. See how this 
stupidity, this limitation in CH works against them?

STRP in CH has conditions to it while in MH nothing can come between him 
and attacking the "right problem."


Polygamy is, again, not the exception but the rule, yet can be practiced 
only under certain circumstances. If none of the women are working and 
are only busy raising kids, the man has to be quite rich to afford it. 
Also in dire situations where there simply aren't enough men around 
(right after large wars) polygamy can help a great deal by keeping 
everything legal and moral. In CH societies the rich always have their 
"secret" harems and right after large wars the excess CH women turn to 
prostitution to make ends meet. Compare the two approaches and see the 
difference between CH and MH.

Polygamy is really a corollary of the same two rules I outlined early on 
in this blog in another branch. Man gets all the silliness he wants when 
there's variety of women at his sexual disposal, while women, each one 
for herself, takes from man of her choice what she needs to make people 
of her choice for the future. Presence of other women doing same and at 
the same time with her doesn't even touch it! She understands them, 
because they are doing same! And each and every one of them always get 
what they want!

A woman alone in a monogamous marriage, with no other women right in 
there to bounce questions and ideas and solutions back and forth between 
them, is ill-equipped to confront and tackle issues that the man could 
inflict on the marriage.

Think about it. Do women really get "jealous" when they, every day of 
their lives, take their pleasant strolls to a natural spring water with 
best quality drinking water flowing to drink from? No! That's what 
they're doing in a polygamous marriage. If you do not think so, then 
regardless of you being man or woman yourself, you are either CH, or 
have been fooled gutless by your CH Church. Cause _my_ "Church" 
perfectly allows that. Why? It isn't based on bullshit the way yours is, 
that's why. It got created among modern men, not among Cro-Magnons; it 
is newer, wiser, better. And you're backward people in comparison.

As I mentioned earlier, I saw this with my own eyes multiple times when 
I was doing census in Iran in mid 1970s. The women every now and then I 
encountered when doing the census were so happy. Sometimes there were 
just 2 of them sometimes (the highest I saw) 6 or 7 of them! All living 
in one house, cooking together, laughing, talking, SINGING together, 
like absolute best friends while sharing the same man every one of them 
had found fit to be her child's father. The effort involved in finding 
another man like that wasn't worth it to them. They already were getting 
everything from that one man that they ever wanted from a man, plus the 
friendship of other like-minded women in the same place they lived. 
There were no jealousy! Jealousy in such matters among women is a 
deviated response nurtured by CH Church via movies and stories, etc; it 
is not natural.

Above all, again, polygamy makes us acquire the speed to leave behind 
other apes and go forward with our own better features in us. It is for 
and made by the MH.




-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#836056

On 11/16/2021 2:53 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> Then he got more serious in his activities and began participating in 
> street rallies promoting firm resistance against communists. In a few of 
> these rallies he got badly assaulted and physically beaten up by 
> communists; he never forgot such incidents.


Historians (of CH creed) are often negligent about this matter. You need 
to read Hitler's book to understand where exactly he stood and why.

It was one thing intellectually opposing a social theory that he fully 
understood was only made to harm CH civilization, and another thing when 
he would get severe beatings from those communists in the streets every 
time he attempted to reason with them peacefully... It just formed a 
solid foundation in him against communism and communists, therefore 
against Jews.

The general CH limitations in Hitler of course had a role, because he 
could not find it in himself to do anything to counter what the CH had 
done to Jews in more than a thousand years. He felt cornered by the Jews 
and their "communism" because a solution to the exact problem that had 
caused creation of communism would involve removing a general 
shortcoming in CH people en masse, something neither Hitler nor Martin 
Luther could do.

I don't want to delve into this matter at this occasion, but the correct 
approach to Jews' destructive plans would have to address "The Right 
Problem" and "Solve The Right Problem", then communism by itself would 
go away.

But!

Can a species correct the shortcomings peculiar to that species alone? 
Hehe :-) Of course not. You wouldn't be CH if you could make yourself 
something other than a CH. Jews were reacting to shortcomings in CH and 
CH could not do a damn thing about CH cause that's what CH was and is. 
That's what Hitler was! A CH. So he was cornered now; therefore, instead 
of solving the right problem, he attempted to remedy another problem 
having to do with CH themselves: the problem of facing "evil" 
consequences of CH atrocities towards Jews, with no other option left 
than destroying those Jews and their communism both.

When problem itself is existence of CH in this day and age, then you see 
Hell happen until there's not a single CH left on the face of the planet 
Earth that still enjoys any form of power over the MH. As simple as 
that. That's how human _evolves_. The room for earlier forms of human 
get smaller and smaller. This actually happened once not too long after 
the end of the ice age before the last one. All those CH were gone and 
forgotten until the last ice age ended and another batch of Neanderthals 
were discovered in some corner of Europe. So we are witnessing that same 
process again, but this time for the last time.







-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834615

On 10/19/2021 1:02 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:

<snip bizarre racism>

> I don't know about Blacks at all, never studied them. But we do see the 

African blacks are as close as possible to pure "Modern Human".  You and 
I and everyone else descended from "out of Africa" humans have some 
Neanderthal in them.  Neanderthals or mixed descendants didn't get back 
into Africa for the most part.  Polynesians and certain Asian groups 
have Denisova as well.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834681

On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:25:26 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> On 10/19/2021 1:02 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: 
> 
> <snip bizarre racism>
> > I don't know about Blacks at all, never studied them. But we do see the
> African blacks are as close as possible to pure "Modern Human". You and 
> I and everyone else descended from "out of Africa" humans have some 
> Neanderthal in them. Neanderthals or mixed descendants didn't get back 
> into Africa for the most part. Polynesians and certain Asian groups 
> have Denisova as well.


You should substantiate your claims with a model that results in what you find. Only then I take a look.

Anything I say here, right or wrong, is at least based on a model that I worked on carefully three decades back. 

Your "bizarre racism" comment does not belong to sci.physics. Take it to an appropriate forum where you'll actually get others discussing such stuff with you. No chance of it in a physics forum :) 

Bye until your grow up some more.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834707

On 10/19/2021 12:02 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


So far one function and one attribute discussed:

Analytics Compartment Of Brain (ACOB):
-------------------------------------

* functions:
   - Substitution
     Example 1: getting fired "calamity"
     Example 2: demography of junkies
     Example 3: meaningful physical activity vs idiotic movements
     Example 4: Martin Luther's 2nd downsizing of Christianity to fit CH
     Example 5: emigrating
     Example 6: my moving to USA
     Example 7: from dollar to cryptocurrency
     Example 8: invention of writing
     Example 9: destroying Greek MH advances
     Example 10: Dark Ages
     Example 11: Christianity's 1st downsizing of Mithraism to fit CH
     Example 12: European MH selling houses to CH for $1
     Example 13: CH settlement in America only after European MH settled

* attributes:
   - Secrecy
     Example 1: Curzon's silence on Indians
     Example 2: Iran's open doors
     Example 3: American Natives open doors
     Example 4: U.S. Navy's open doors
     Example 5: U.S. embassy in Tehran, August 1953
     Example 6: destroying original "Persia and the Persian Question"
     Example 7: modern day hidden Monastery collections


In two other branches from this spot on the tree of the blog I described 
the function of Substitution and the attribute of Secrecy and brought 
examples of each. Now I continue with function of "Solving The Right 
Problem (STRP).

Solving The Right Problem (STRP)

MH deals with real problems and real problems only. CH has to deal with 
real and imaginary problems by necessity. So oftentimes "solves" just 
one of the imaginary ones. As ridiculous as it is, it is very important 
to take a look at cause we MH have to live (for the time being) with 
these CH creatures.

Confronted with a problem, both MH and CH of course first objectively 
look at the situation. Then MH finds the solution to it and does 
something about it right away. Old or new practice, doesn't matter to 
MH. Precedence doesn't matter to MH. But CH confronted with that same 
problem constantly checks possible solutions with a set of dogmas his 
group happens to hold. If direct solution to that problem contradicts a 
dogma or two, it is not a solution, he discards it. From this point on 
he proceeds to change the problem itself to a series of other imaginary 
ones which only _resemble_ the original one to find one that has a 
non-contradicting solution and "solves" that imaginary problem! Haven't 
we seen this taking place over and over again by our gglllorious 
Cro-Magnon humans.

Therefore STRP happens only randomly for CH. For MH, STRP is of course 
always the case.

What if solution to the real problem is something new? Doesn't 
contradict dogmas but has no precedence? In these cases CH has to seek 
authority first to see whether they OK it or not. If authorities ok it, 
it becomes a solution :) Hahah :-) So STRP among CH is only rarely 
achieved. And this is a recurring issue for them.

Short term be it good or bad, long term it is the accumulative effects 
of these actions that in time contributes to the extinction of CH as a 
species coexisting with MH. Future indeed will only reserve a handful of 
genes from CH, nothing more.

In my models 30 years back I experimented with percentages of times that 
CH correctly manages STRP. No matter how small or large that percentage 
was, it led to their extinction some period of time later. CH could 
never survive it long term. So if my previous and present notes here 
sound like bullshit to you, you might want to wise up and realize you 
have a problem here very tricky and complicated to just refute and carry 
on with your ignorance.

Simply put, the most ominous consequence of group-thinking in CH is his 
inability to correctly manage STRP. It's the worst consequence for them.

MH are _not_ group thinkers; they are equipped to think individually. 
Any kind of thinking, not just analytical thinking! Logical thinking or 
conceptual thinking or critical thinking or foolish thinking or weird 
thinking or artistic thinking or analogical thinking or mythical 
thinking or ... or analytical thinking! MH does it all by himself. The 
element of "authority" isn't present in any of that. CH does all the 
above but subjected to the presence of others and their group-views, 
especially the authority's view about subject of his thinking.

I spoke of "dogma". Views among CH are always shared by many many others 
(otherwise he hides it and fights it all his life) :) So they easily 
turn into dogmas cause others are watching. If authority proclaims it, 
then it must be the thing to do or believe or be. CH societies are full 
of dogmas, right now as well as along the entire known history of them. 
Many of these dogmas are of course obsolete and needing changes that are 
not coming that easily or any soon. Rings a bell or two or ten or .. ? 
Hehe :) Yes it rings a bell.

I'll continue with examples after I'm done with walking. So fuck off.






-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834780

On 10/25/2021 11:30 AM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 10/19/2021 12:02 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Solving The Right Problem (STRP)
> 
> MH deals with real problems and real problems only. CH has to deal with 
> real and imaginary problems by necessity. So oftentimes "solves" just 
> one of the imaginary ones. As ridiculous as it is, it is very important 
> to take a look at cause we MH have to live (for the time being) with 
> these CH creatures.
> 
> Confronted with a problem, both MH and CH of course first objectively 
> look at the situation. Then MH finds the solution to it and does 
> something about it right away. Old or new practice, doesn't matter to 
> MH. Precedence doesn't matter to MH. But CH confronted with that same 
> problem constantly checks possible solutions with a set of dogmas his 
> group happens to hold. If direct solution to that problem contradicts a 
> dogma or two, it is not a solution, he discards it. From this point on 
> he proceeds to change the problem itself to a series of other imaginary 
> ones which only _resemble_ the original one to find one that has a 
> non-contradicting solution and "solves" that imaginary problem! Haven't 
> we seen this taking place over and over again by our gglllorious 
> Cro-Magnon humans.
> 
> Therefore STRP happens only randomly for CH. For MH, STRP is of course 
> always the case.
> 
> What if solution to the real problem is something new? Doesn't 
> contradict dogmas but has no precedence? In these cases CH has to seek 
> authority first to see whether they OK it or not. If authorities ok it, 
> it becomes a solution :) Hahah :-) So STRP among CH is only rarely 
> achieved. And this is a recurring issue for them.
> 
> Short term be it good or bad, long term it is the accumulative effects 
> of these actions that in time contributes to the extinction of CH as a 
> species coexisting with MH. Future indeed will only reserve a handful of 
> genes from CH, nothing more.
> 
> In my models 30 years back I experimented with percentages of times that 
> CH correctly manages STRP. No matter how small or large that percentage 
> was, it led to their extinction some period of time later. CH could 
> never survive it long term. So if my previous and present notes here 
> sound like bullshit to you, you might want to wise up and realize you 
> have a problem here very tricky and complicated to just refute and carry 
> on with your ignorance.
> 
> Simply put, the most ominous consequence of group-thinking in CH is his 
> inability to correctly manage STRP. It's the worst consequence for them.
> 
> MH are _not_ group thinkers; they are equipped to think individually. 
> Any kind of thinking, not just analytical thinking! Logical thinking or 
> conceptual thinking or critical thinking or foolish thinking or weird 
> thinking or artistic thinking or analogical thinking or mythical 
> thinking or ... or analytical thinking! MH does it all by himself. The 
> element of "authority" isn't present in any of that. CH does all the 
> above but subjected to the presence of others and their group-views, 
> especially the authority's view about subject of his thinking.
> 
> I spoke of "dogma". Views among CH are always shared by many many others 
> (otherwise he hides it and fights it all his life) :) So they easily 
> turn into dogmas cause others are watching. If authority proclaims it, 
> then it must be the thing to do or believe or be. CH societies are full 
> of dogmas, right now as well as along the entire known history of them. 
> Many of these dogmas are of course obsolete and needing changes that are 
> not coming that easily or any soon. Rings a bell or two or ten or .. ? 
> Hehe :) Yes it rings a bell.
> 
> I'll continue with examples after I'm done with walking. So fuck off.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

So far two function and one attribute discussed:

Analytics Compartment Of Brain (ACOB):
-------------------------------------

* functions:

   - Substitution
     Example 1: getting fired "calamity"
     Example 2: demography of junkies
     Example 3: meaningful physical activity vs idiotic movements
     Example 4: Martin Luther's 2nd downsizing of Christianity to fit CH
     Example 5: emigrating
     Example 6: my moving to USA
     Example 7: from dollar to cryptocurrency
     Example 8: invention of writing
     Example 9: destroying Greek MH advances
     Example 10: Dark Ages
     Example 11: Christianity's 1st downsizing of Mithraism to fit CH
     Example 12: European MH selling houses to CH for $1
     Example 13: CH settlement in America only after European MH settled

   - Solving The Right Problem (STRP)
     Example 1: war instead of trade

* attributes:
   - Secrecy
     Example 1: Curzon's silence on Indians
     Example 2: Iran's open doors
     Example 3: American Natives open doors
     Example 4: U.S. Navy's open doors
     Example 5: U.S. embassy in Tehran, August 1953
     Example 6: destroying original "Persia and the Persian Question"
     Example 7: modern day hidden Monastery collections

STRP examples are plenty. I'll start with the most important (most 
detrimental in the long term) of them first.

Example 1. War instead of trade. When two different species of human too 
close in abilities and features are both present, the problem of 
coexistence becomes complicated. Any complication on the other hand is 
handled better by MH than CH. So behavior of CH in these situations 
creates conflicts because their "solutions" to this problem aren't 
necessarily same as those of MH's.

When this conflict arises, CH resorts to war as the only option because 
it is much easier among them to lead a large group of them into it than 
it is among MH where everybody thinks individually and out of say 10000 
men close to 10000 different ideas of solving the problem are given.

This means that when CH engages in war most probably it is not called 
for while when MH engages in war, you're fucked! Because war in that 
situation was actually the _correct_approach_ in solving the problem and 
you have a heck of a problem on your hands fighting a species that 
thinks better than you.

Presently and in the entire history, wars are imposed upon MH by CH, 
almost all of them for wrong reasons. And presently a few wars are 
actually being fought by the MH against CH, so important, so decisive, 
and so consequential that nobody ever is even talking about it. It is 
like a fate that has befallen the CH! Do they even know that? Of course 
some of they do :)

And this "correct approach" by MH wouldn't even have started if result 
was not found to be certain win. We don't do anything unless we know 
what we're doing. And these are all consequences of being in possession 
of a better ACOB.

Coexistence is of course best achieved by trade in which both sides 
_fairly_ benefit. That's the approach that MH takes and that's the 
approach that you see in history all modern human took.

MH defense against stupid war mongering of CH isn't always conducting a 
war of course :) Take what we Iranians did against Romans and how we 
eventually solved that problem conclusively. That's the subject of next 
example :-)


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835020

On 10/27/2021 10:35 AM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> Coexistence is of course best achieved by trade in which both sides 
> _fairly_ benefit. That's the approach that MH takes and that's the 
> approach that you see in history all modern human took.


The Mongol onslaught on MH, a case of MH war on MH, was an exception in 
which both sides were taking the correct approach! I will discuss it 
later in detail.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835320

On 11/3/2021 10:35 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 10/27/2021 10:35 AM, Clutterfreak wrote:
>> Coexistence is of course best achieved by trade in which both sides 
>> _fairly_ benefit. That's the approach that MH takes and that's the 
>> approach that you see in history all modern human took.
> 
> 
> The Mongol onslaught on MH, a case of MH war on MH, was an exception in 
> which both sides were taking the correct approach! I will discuss it 
> later in detail.
> 


Ok let me explain that important matter now quickly.

Very fast, Mongols didn't aim to ravage every sign of civilization and 
life anywhere that they happened to move to. They were totally pragmatic 
people and didn't have time for anger or greed or whim, etc. Indeed they 
offered some of the best examples of MH inside and out, and what they 
did was not the result of stupidity or malice, but absolute necessity. 
That's why it happened!

The gist of the matter was that they had, for the first time in history, 
created a too large of a "city" that still relied totally on their mode 
of life :-) It was the first (and last) in history. They were almost 
100% people who lived on livestock. There's a limit for the size of such 
things because these livestock must eat. When such "cities" grew in size 
to a point that there were no grass and grain in the area to feed them, 
the entire "city" had to begin to move!

These "moving cities" were as large or often larger than usual 
stationary and still cities we're all familiar with, and Mongols lived 
inside it, married inside it, gave birth in it, everything, while 
constantly moving. They couldn't even stay 24 hours in one place cause 
some of their livestock would starve to death, so they moved perpetually 
throughout hours and days and years. They lived while constantly moving 
toward areas with grass, and soon after all grass was eaten and gone, 
the city was also gone elsewhere. These "moving cities" never stopped.

The result of this new mode of life, living inside "moving cities", was 
that in the event of a serious war they could not just win the war and 
keep going because enemy would form again behind them very quickly and 
easily.

In conventional wars you defeat your enemy then you establish local 
forces to keep your defeated enemy in check while the rest of your 
forces move forward. Mongols couldn't do that because they didn't have 
anything that could stop and be left behind. Everything had to move 
forward with the rest of the "city".

Therefore after enemy was defeated, they had to also annihilate the 
entire infrastructure, people, any form and manner of equipment and life 
that could be used later to create a resistance to them in their wake. 
It was a necessity, not acts of savagery.

And there were not just one "moving city". There were numerous moving 
cities all carefully distanced from each other so by the time the one 
behind would reach areas once passed by an earlier wave, grass again had 
grown. Even the shape of these cities were calculated accordingly. They 
were boomerang shaped and the angle would change depending on territory 
the city moved through. The front edge to rear edge length of this 
boomerang had its limits cause if too wide the livestock in the rear 
would have nothing to eat. It was some brilliant design Chengiz himself 
had come up with, making such formations at that size and magnitude 
possible for the first time in history. And it was something to see!

The tale of the sight of Mongols moving cities is still on Iranians 
tongues. The wonder, the intricacies, even the smell!... Iranians could 
smell the approaching Mongol cities days in advance. They'd know their 
fates will shortly be met and had ample time to make the most important 
decisions of their lives. Many sided with those who wanted to fight to 
death. The rest were simply slaughtered clean off the face of the area 
where there was a lively city standing before Mongols' arrival.

Now from settled people's point of view, these huge moving cities would 
arrive and devour every form of grass, grain, and food that their 
livestock could eat without asking for permission. Livestock doesn't ask 
for permission. In fact Mongols all the time on approaching a city would 
send messengers in advance to warn the rulers of the city what was 
coming and if they would just stay put until food was finished the 
moving city would keep going away from them without any slaughter. These 
messengers also would tell the settlers that their best horses and 
equipment that could be made to move would also be taken, their entire 
livestock would be taken, and that some of their most beautiful women 
may also be taken. Also all their craftsmen and skilled workers would be 
taken along with them when city would continue moving past what was left 
of their city.

These offers weren't that acceptable, were they. Therefore almost in 
every encounter with a city war would be waged on Mongols on the 
decision and resolve of the settlers. Settlers had to choose between 
absolute ground zero in their lives, left with no food, no horses, no 
livestock; or, they would defend themselves to death. In many many 
cities that Mongols arrived at, the latter proved to be the case, and 
war would break out, and Mongols would win then absolutely everything 
that was left of the city and the citizenry would be destroyed to 
prevent creation of a resisting force.

But why Mongols always won the wars? (Mongols were never defeated)

These Mongols, these moving cities, on approaching Iran's eastern 
borders carried with them 20 years of accumulated experience, know-how, 
equipment, skilled men, warriors, designers, leaders, commanders, 
soldiers, and everything else that was required in a new war. It was not 
a force made of one people and something particular to them only. It was 
the aggregate of _everything_ in the art of war that people from 
Mongolia, China, and three other major central Asian civilizations had 
supplied them with. Mongols were already strong enough when they had 
defeated China 20 years earlier; just guess what they'd turned into when 
they approached Iran. Therefore by this time, nobody in the world, no 
fighting power in existence anywhere could defeat them. That's what Iran 
faced...

Mongols knew that! And Iranians knew that! So for settlers it was all a 
matter of fighting to absolute annihilation, or staying aside and let 
this gigantic moving city pass through and take every god damn thing 
with it, reducing them to nothing but empty houses, old useless men and 
women and the sick and mentally defective. They even took all teenagers 
with them to train them they way they needed. Very very few cities or 
towns accepted Mongols terms. So destruction was indeed absolute and 
thorough.

Iran to this day is recovering from it. China is just finishing the last 
stages of recovery from it. Korea is recovering from it fast. This 
thing, this Mongol phenomena, even today 800 years after, is an ongoing 
matter that's being dealt with. And nobody in it can be pointed fingers 
at. Mongols had to do what was right and had no other choice but doing 
what they did, and settlers had to do what they deemed right and 
honorable to do.

It was a case of MH waging war against MH while both sides were correct 
in their approaches. It was nothing like WWI or WWII or all these wars 
fought by CH where ingrained stupidity is at the center. It was an 
eyeopening example of how MH never engages in war unless it is 
absolutely the correct approach in action.

Must go walking now.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835334

On Tuesday, 9 November 2021 at 05:52:14 UTC+11, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 11/3/2021 10:35 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: 
> > On 10/27/2021 10:35 AM, Clutterfreak wrote: 
> >> Coexistence is of course best achieved by trade in which both sides 
> >> _fairly_ benefit. That's the approach that MH takes and that's the 
> >> approach that you see in history all modern human took. 
> > 
> > 
> > The Mongol onslaught on MH, a case of MH war on MH, was an exception in 
> > which both sides were taking the correct approach! I will discuss it 
> > later in detail. 
> >
> Ok let me explain that important matter now quickly. 
> 
> Very fast, Mongols didn't aim to ravage every sign of civilization and 
> life anywhere that they happened to move to. They were totally pragmatic 
> people and didn't have time for anger or greed or whim, etc. Indeed they 
> offered some of the best examples of MH inside and out, and what they 
> did was not the result of stupidity or malice, but absolute necessity. 
> That's why it happened! 
> 
> The gist of the matter was that they had, for the first time in history, 
> created a too large of a "city" that still relied totally on their mode 
> of life :-) It was the first (and last) in history. They were almost 
> 100% people who lived on livestock. There's a limit for the size of such 
> things because these livestock must eat. When such "cities" grew in size 
> to a point that there were no grass and grain in the area to feed them, 
> the entire "city" had to begin to move! 
> 
> These "moving cities" were as large or often larger than usual 
> stationary and still cities we're all familiar with, and Mongols lived 
> inside it, married inside it, gave birth in it, everything, while 
> constantly moving. They couldn't even stay 24 hours in one place cause 
> some of their livestock would starve to death, so they moved perpetually 
> throughout hours and days and years. They lived while constantly moving 
> toward areas with grass, and soon after all grass was eaten and gone, 
> the city was also gone elsewhere. These "moving cities" never stopped. 
> 
> The result of this new mode of life, living inside "moving cities", was 
> that in the event of a serious war they could not just win the war and 
> keep going because enemy would form again behind them very quickly and 
> easily. 
> 
> In conventional wars you defeat your enemy then you establish local 
> forces to keep your defeated enemy in check while the rest of your 
> forces move forward. Mongols couldn't do that because they didn't have 
> anything that could stop and be left behind. Everything had to move 
> forward with the rest of the "city". 
> 
> Therefore after enemy was defeated, they had to also annihilate the 
> entire infrastructure, people, any form and manner of equipment and life 
> that could be used later to create a resistance to them in their wake. 
> It was a necessity, not acts of savagery. 
> 
> And there were not just one "moving city". There were numerous moving 
> cities all carefully distanced from each other so by the time the one 
> behind would reach areas once passed by an earlier wave, grass again had 
> grown. Even the shape of these cities were calculated accordingly. They 
> were boomerang shaped and the angle would change depending on territory 
> the city moved through. The front edge to rear edge length of this 
> boomerang had its limits cause if too wide the livestock in the rear 
> would have nothing to eat. It was some brilliant design Chengiz himself 
> had come up with, making such formations at that size and magnitude 
> possible for the first time in history. And it was something to see! 
> 
> The tale of the sight of Mongols moving cities is still on Iranians 
> tongues. The wonder, the intricacies, even the smell!... Iranians could 
> smell the approaching Mongol cities days in advance. They'd know their 
> fates will shortly be met and had ample time to make the most important 
> decisions of their lives. Many sided with those who wanted to fight to 
> death. The rest were simply slaughtered clean off the face of the area 
> where there was a lively city standing before Mongols' arrival. 
> 
> Now from settled people's point of view, these huge moving cities would 
> arrive and devour every form of grass, grain, and food that their 
> livestock could eat without asking for permission. Livestock doesn't ask 
> for permission. In fact Mongols all the time on approaching a city would 
> send messengers in advance to warn the rulers of the city what was 
> coming and if they would just stay put until food was finished the 
> moving city would keep going away from them without any slaughter. These 
> messengers also would tell the settlers that their best horses and 
> equipment that could be made to move would also be taken, their entire 
> livestock would be taken, and that some of their most beautiful women 
> may also be taken. Also all their craftsmen and skilled workers would be 
> taken along with them when city would continue moving past what was left 
> of their city. 
> 
> These offers weren't that acceptable, were they. Therefore almost in 
> every encounter with a city war would be waged on Mongols on the 
> decision and resolve of the settlers. Settlers had to choose between 
> absolute ground zero in their lives, left with no food, no horses, no 
> livestock; or, they would defend themselves to death. In many many 
> cities that Mongols arrived at, the latter proved to be the case, and 
> war would break out, and Mongols would win then absolutely everything 
> that was left of the city and the citizenry would be destroyed to 
> prevent creation of a resisting force. 
> 
> But why Mongols always won the wars? (Mongols were never defeated) 
> 
> These Mongols, these moving cities, on approaching Iran's eastern 
> borders carried with them 20 years of accumulated experience, know-how, 
> equipment, skilled men, warriors, designers, leaders, commanders, 
> soldiers, and everything else that was required in a new war. It was not 
> a force made of one people and something particular to them only. It was 
> the aggregate of _everything_ in the art of war that people from 
> Mongolia, China, and three other major central Asian civilizations had 
> supplied them with. Mongols were already strong enough when they had 
> defeated China 20 years earlier; just guess what they'd turned into when 
> they approached Iran. Therefore by this time, nobody in the world, no 
> fighting power in existence anywhere could defeat them. That's what Iran 
> faced... 
> 
> Mongols knew that! And Iranians knew that! So for settlers it was all a 
> matter of fighting to absolute annihilation, or staying aside and let 
> this gigantic moving city pass through and take every god damn thing 
> with it, reducing them to nothing but empty houses, old useless men and 
> women and the sick and mentally defective. They even took all teenagers 
> with them to train them they way they needed. Very very few cities or 
> towns accepted Mongols terms. So destruction was indeed absolute and 
> thorough. 
> 
> Iran to this day is recovering from it. China is just finishing the last 
> stages of recovery from it. Korea is recovering from it fast. This 
> thing, this Mongol phenomena, even today 800 years after, is an ongoing 
> matter that's being dealt with. And nobody in it can be pointed fingers 
> at. Mongols had to do what was right and had no other choice but doing 
> what they did, and settlers had to do what they deemed right and 
> honorable to do. 
> 
> It was a case of MH waging war against MH while both sides were correct 
> in their approaches. It was nothing like WWI or WWII or all these wars 
> fought by CH where ingrained stupidity is at the center. It was an 
> eyeopening example of how MH never engages in war unless it is 
> absolutely the correct approach in action. 
> 
> Must go walking now.
> -- 
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

With cockroach wisdom two rights make a gigantic wrong.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web