Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #894581 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-11-30 13:38 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-12-04 12:59 +0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 105 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 13:38 +0100
An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 13:54 +0100
An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 13:55 +0100
What is analog computing nowadays? (Re: An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 11:25 +0100
Wake-up call until everybody gets ear-bleeding (Re: What is analog computing nowadays?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 12:01 +0100
BB(745) is independent of ZFC (Was: Wake-up call until everybody gets ear-bleeding) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 12:07 +0100
Write ZFC formulas on a tape (of a Turing machine) (Re: BB(745) is independent of ZFC ) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:18 +0100
Turing machines have neurons (Re: Write ZFC formulas on a tape (of a Turing machine)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:19 +0100
A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943] (Re: Turing machines have neurons) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:20 +0100
Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (Was: A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:39 +0100
Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (Was: A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:43 +0100
Re: Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (Was: A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:18 +0100
Re: What is analog computing nowadays? (Re: An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-01 12:09 +0100
parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 12:15 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-01 13:23 +0100
Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction (Was: parallel random-access machine) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 17:12 +0100
Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011) (Was: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 17:31 +0100
PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc.. (Was: Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:02 +0100
Re: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction (Was: parallel random-access machine) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-01 17:59 +0100
PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc.. (Re: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:05 +0100
PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc.. (Re: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:08 +0100
Physics more difficult than Rasperry LED cube? (Was: PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc..) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:25 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-03 07:17 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-03 06:46 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-03 08:02 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-04 07:50 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-04 09:57 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 17:02 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:22 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:39 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:46 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-07 11:42 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-07 16:26 +0200
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 04:25 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-08 13:58 +0200
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:15 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:21 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 09:06 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:19 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-09 11:43 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-10 08:19 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-10 09:56 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-10 10:01 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-11 09:02 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 08:48 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-12 01:58 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 20:45 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 23:07 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-12 00:49 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 14:27 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:25 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 21:22 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 12:52 -0800
I have a great idea The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 13:11 -0800
Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-15 03:00 +0100
Re: Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 19:46 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:27 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:58 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-15 07:50 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-15 14:05 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-16 08:44 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-16 22:58 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-17 08:50 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-17 14:00 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-17 10:49 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-17 11:23 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-17 14:24 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-18 22:13 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-19 12:02 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-17 18:24 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2025-12-17 11:58 -0600
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-12 07:19 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-12 11:35 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-18 06:49 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 05:30 +0100
Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-11-30 14:06 +0100
You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 22:27 +0100
Its a subconscious hypothesis (Was: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 22:33 +0100
What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious hypothesis) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 22:43 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious hypothesis) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-01 23:43 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-01 23:45 +0100
newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 00:00 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-02 03:10 +0000
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 11:51 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-02 20:36 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 21:42 -0800
Orbits of planets in the Sol System (was: newsreader where you can see the message source) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-04 03:29 +0100
Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-04 03:30 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-02 20:35 +0100
Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish (Re: newsreader where you can see the message source) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:22 +0100
Is it like "Wirres Mückengelaber" ? (Was: Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:28 +0100
newsreader where you can see the message source (Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 00:11 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-03 07:22 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-03 08:27 -0800
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-04 07:57 +0100
Re: Its a subconscious hypothesis (Was: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-30 23:14 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-01 23:23 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 00:05 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-02 20:29 +0100
What Spock aka Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn missed (Was: Different Hubble Theories: de Sitter Energy) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 01:09 +0100
The size of a Gödel sentence G (Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 09:00 +0100
The size of a Gödel sentence G (Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 09:00 +0100
Attacking the Busy Beaver 5 [1989] (Re: The size of a Gödel sentence G) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 09:10 +0100
Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-12-04 12:59 +0800
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-01 23:43 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious hypothesis) |
| Message-ID | <10gl5ma$27mnu$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #894588 |
Mild Shock wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^ Please repair this. > What if the planets in certain galaxies > form a turning machine. They do not. You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer science to natural science. Also, you should learn how to post. This was a completely new question, so you should not have posted it as a follow-up. Also, you should not have top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business communication, but not in Usenet. It is also not appropriate to crosspost without Followup-To to *one* newsgroup set. I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about the communication medium that you are using here. Lest you be killfiled rather quickly by people. > Could Keppler Johannes _Kepler_ > have modelled a 3 planet system. Yes, he did, but not exactly. > Can we model a 3 planet system now ? Obviously; there are simulations of the Sol System e.g. in Universe Sandbox. But the 3-body-problem is not about 3 planets, but more general. There is no *general* *exact* solution to this problem; just a solution for the *restricted* 3-body-problem in which one of the objects has a very large mass; the second object, e.g. a gas giant like Jupiter, has a smaller mass and is very far away from the first object; and the third object. e.g. an asteroid, has a small that is small enough to be negligible, and is comparably far away from the first and second object, respectively. And this is neglecting general-relativistic corrections that lead to an additional contribution in the precession of the perihelia (orbits are not actually ellipses, closed curves). F'up2 sci.physics -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-01 23:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? |
| Message-ID | <10gl5q9$27mnu$2@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #894588 |
Mild Shock wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^ Please repair this. > Subject: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious hypothesis) The correct way to change the Subject is "... (was: ...)". Then some newsreaders can automatically remove the " (was: ...)" part on composing a follow-up. > What if the planets in certain galaxies > form a turning machine. They do not. You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer science to natural science. Also, you should learn how to post. This was a completely new question, so you should not have posted it as a follow-up. Also, you should not have top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business communication, but not in Usenet. It is also not appropriate to crosspost without Followup-To to *one* newsgroup set. I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about the communication medium that you are using here. Lest you be killfiled rather quickly by people. > Could Keppler Johannes _Kepler_ > have modelled a 3 planet system. Yes, he did, but not exactly. > Can we model a 3 planet system now ? Obviously; there are simulations of the Sol System e.g. in Universe Sandbox. But the 3-body-problem is not about 3 planets, but more general. There is no *general* *exact* solution to this problem; just a solution for the *restricted* 3-body-problem in which one of the objects has a very large mass; the second object, e.g. a gas giant like Jupiter, has a smaller mass and is very far away from the first object; and the third object. e.g. an asteroid, has a small that is small enough to be negligible, and is comparably far away from the first and second object, respectively. And this is neglecting general-relativistic corrections that lead to an additional contribution in the precession of the perihelia (orbits are not actually ellipses, closed curves). F'up2 sci.physics -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 00:00 +0100 |
| Subject | newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) |
| Message-ID | <10gl6lr$vuv1$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #894607 |
Hi, Don't you have a newsreader where you can see the message source. You don't need more information than Mild Shock in the message body, you see everything in the message headers. For example I see in your message: From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; logging-data="2349822"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org" So you posted from INWX GmbH? Still you give advice how to format a USENET post, even you are not able to see the message source, of my posts? You can easily read off who I am. Maybe get a decend news reader before you give advice how to post. Fucking 5 year old imbecil, get lost in your kindergarden. Bye Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb: > Mild Shock wrote: > ^^^^^^^^^^ > Please repair this. > >> Subject: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious > hypothesis) > > The correct way to change the Subject is "... (was: ...)". Then some > newsreaders can automatically remove the " (was: ...)" part on composing a > follow-up. > >> What if the planets in certain galaxies >> form a turning machine. > > They do not. > > You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer science > to natural science. > > Also, you should learn how to post. This was a completely new question, so > you should not have posted it as a follow-up. Also, you should not have > top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the > previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business communication, but > not in Usenet. It is also not appropriate to crosspost without Followup-To > to *one* newsgroup set. > > I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or > consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about > the communication medium that you are using here. Lest you be killfiled > rather quickly by people. > >> Could Keppler > > Johannes _Kepler_ > >> have modelled a 3 planet system. > > Yes, he did, but not exactly. > >> Can we model a 3 planet system now ? > > Obviously; there are simulations of the Sol System e.g. in Universe Sandbox. > But the 3-body-problem is not about 3 planets, but more general. > > There is no *general* *exact* solution to this problem; just a solution for > the *restricted* 3-body-problem in which one of the objects has a very large > mass; the second object, e.g. a gas giant like Jupiter, has a smaller mass > and is very far away from the first object; and the third object. e.g. an > asteroid, has a small that is small enough to be negligible, and is > comparably far away from the first and second object, respectively. > > And this is neglecting general-relativistic corrections that lead to an > additional contribution in the precession of the perihelia (orbits are not > actually ellipses, closed curves). > > F'up2 sci.physics >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@cccp.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 03:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) |
| Message-ID | <UdWZ19mwDODlddMuz2X7pRvKSvM@jntp> |
| In reply to | #894608 |
Le 02/12/2025 à 00:00, Mild Shock a écrit : > Hi, > > Don't you have a newsreader where you can > see the message source. You don't need more > information than Mild Shock in the message > > body, you see everything in the message > headers. For example I see in your message: > > From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> > Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; logging-data="2349822"; > mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org" > > So you posted from INWX GmbH? Still you > give advice how to format a USENET post, even > you are not able to see the message source, > > of my posts? You can easily read off who I am. > Maybe get a decend news reader before you give > advice how to post. > > Fucking 5 year old imbecil, get lost in your kindergarden. > > Bye > > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb: >> Mild Shock wrote: >> ^^^^^^^^^^ >> Please repair this. >> >>> Subject: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious >> hypothesis) >> >> The correct way to change the Subject is "... (was: ...)". Then some >> newsreaders can automatically remove the " (was: ...)" part on composing a >> follow-up. >> >>> What if the planets in certain galaxies >>> form a turning machine. >> >> They do not. >> >> You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer science >> to natural science. >> >> Also, you should learn how to post. This was a completely new question, so >> you should not have posted it as a follow-up. Also, you should not have >> top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the >> previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business communication, but >> not in Usenet. It is also not appropriate to crosspost without Followup-To >> to *one* newsgroup set. >> >> I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or >> consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about >> the communication medium that you are using here. Lest you be killfiled >> rather quickly by people. >> >>> Could Keppler >> >> Johannes _Kepler_ >> >>> have modelled a 3 planet system. >> >> Yes, he did, but not exactly. >> >>> Can we model a 3 planet system now ? >> >> Obviously; there are simulations of the Sol System e.g. in Universe Sandbox. >> But the 3-body-problem is not about 3 planets, but more general. >> >> There is no *general* *exact* solution to this problem; just a solution for >> the *restricted* 3-body-problem in which one of the objects has a very large >> mass; the second object, e.g. a gas giant like Jupiter, has a smaller mass >> and is very far away from the first object; and the third object. e.g. an >> asteroid, has a small that is small enough to be negligible, and is >> comparably far away from the first and second object, respectively. >> >> And this is neglecting general-relativistic corrections that lead to an >> additional contribution in the precession of the perihelia (orbits are not >> actually ellipses, closed curves). >> >> F'up2 sci.physics >> you're not going well, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 11:51 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) |
| Message-ID | <10gmgb5$usn3$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #894613 |
And here comes the next oneliner imbecil. I wish the USENET was like 10 years ago, where there were veritable cranks and trolls, that wrote 2-3 page essays, that were interesting and challenge to respond. Now its all autism, and inquisitory questions. Everybody has his brain amputated and fears making expositions. So get lost, fuck yourself annonying moron. Python schrieb: > you're not going well, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 20:36 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) |
| Message-ID | <10gnf44$2e7cc$2@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #894614 |
Mild Shock wrote: > And here comes the next oneliner imbecil. > I wish the USENET was like 10 years ago, > where there were veritable cranks and trolls, > > that wrote 2-3 page essays, that were interesting > and challenge to respond. Now its all autism, > and inquisitory questions. Everybody has his > > brain amputated and fears making expositions. > > So get lost, fuck yourself annonying moron. *PLONK* -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-01 21:42 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) |
| Message-ID | <y7adndxwa7vu4bP0nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #894613 |
On 12/01/2025 07:10 PM, Python wrote: > Le 02/12/2025 à 00:00, Mild Shock a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> Don't you have a newsreader where you can >> see the message source. You don't need more >> information than Mild Shock in the message >> >> body, you see everything in the message >> headers. For example I see in your message: >> >> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> >> Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; logging-data="2349822"; >> mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org" >> >> So you posted from INWX GmbH? Still you >> give advice how to format a USENET post, even >> you are not able to see the message source, >> >> of my posts? You can easily read off who I am. >> Maybe get a decend news reader before you give >> advice how to post. >> >> Fucking 5 year old imbecil, get lost in your kindergarden. >> >> Bye >> >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb: >>> Mild Shock wrote: >>> ^^^^^^^^^^ >>> Please repair this. >>> >>>> Subject: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a >>>> subconscious >>> hypothesis) >>> >>> The correct way to change the Subject is "... (was: ...)". Then some >>> newsreaders can automatically remove the " (was: ...)" part on >>> composing a >>> follow-up. >>> >>>> What if the planets in certain galaxies >>>> form a turning machine. >>> >>> They do not. >>> >>> You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer >>> science >>> to natural science. >>> >>> Also, you should learn how to post. This was a completely new >>> question, so >>> you should not have posted it as a follow-up. Also, you should not have >>> top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the >>> previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business >>> communication, but >>> not in Usenet. It is also not appropriate to crosspost without >>> Followup-To >>> to *one* newsgroup set. >>> >>> I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or >>> consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about >>> the communication medium that you are using here. Lest you be killfiled >>> rather quickly by people. >>> >>>> Could Keppler >>> >>> Johannes _Kepler_ >>> >>>> have modelled a 3 planet system. >>> >>> Yes, he did, but not exactly. >>> >>>> Can we model a 3 planet system now ? >>> >>> Obviously; there are simulations of the Sol System e.g. in Universe >>> Sandbox. >>> But the 3-body-problem is not about 3 planets, but more general. >>> >>> There is no *general* *exact* solution to this problem; just a >>> solution for >>> the *restricted* 3-body-problem in which one of the objects has a >>> very large >>> mass; the second object, e.g. a gas giant like Jupiter, has a smaller >>> mass >>> and is very far away from the first object; and the third object. >>> e.g. an >>> asteroid, has a small that is small enough to be negligible, and is >>> comparably far away from the first and second object, respectively. >>> >>> And this is neglecting general-relativistic corrections that lead to an >>> additional contribution in the precession of the perihelia (orbits >>> are not >>> actually ellipses, closed curves). >>> >>> F'up2 sci.physics >>> > > you're not going well, right? > > Perhaps we might ascribe it to typical brattiness, .... That said I enjoy Lahn so it's of peripheral interest notions like Kepler's banishment of epicycles and as after about Bode's law then as for inverse square the Keplerian geometric way then that the Newtonian "System of the World" after the Keplerian "System of the World" or Harmonisches Mundi after the Muslim "System of the Heavens" and that, that, in the solar system today, the force vector of gravity always points at the source not the image, so, it's quite Newtonian and even Galilean the current state of the solar system, while it is yet so that space-contraction-linear and space-contraction-rotational are in effect, as with regards to a notion like "fall-gravity" of course. I.e., Einstein's later "attack on Newton" is a matter of mechanics itself as much as about relativity and mass-energy-equivalency, getting into why the gyroscopic effects as of the kinematic up after "pseudo"-momentum and the space-contraction-rotational, has that Einstein's second and much-less-well-known mass-energy-equivalency derivation, about the centrally symmetric, helps establish the concern overall as, "un-linear", for a potentialistic theory and sum-of-potentials and revisiting the Lagrangian the severe abstraction the mechanical reduction. I don't even mind Python/Messager, .... The pettiness, ..., the brattiness, ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-04 03:29 +0100 |
| Subject | Orbits of planets in the Sol System (was: newsreader where you can see the message source) |
| Message-ID | <10gqrll$2m2qk$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #894638 |
Ross Finlayson wrote: > notions like Kepler's banishment of epicycles and as > after about Bode's law The _Titius–Bode_ law (1766/1772) was proposed much later than Kepler (16th century), obviously. And to date nobody understands why it approximately works for the Sol System: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titius–Bode_law> > then as for inverse square the Keplerian geometric way Yes, Kepler's idea was that the "harmonics of the world" would be represented by inscribed Platonic solids to determine the distances between the orbits of the Planets. However, he was scientist enough to accept eventually that, given Tycho Brahe's detailed observations, the circular orbits that resulted from that would not work: ellipses were required. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler#Astronomy> > then that the Newtonian "System of the World" after > the Keplerian "System of the World" or Harmonisches Mundi _/harmonices mundi/_ (Latin for "_harmonics_ of the world") > after the Muslim "System of the Heavens" Doubtful. Kepler was a devout Christian who sought to discover/understand "God's design of the Universe". > and that, that, in the solar system today, > the force vector of gravity always points at the > source not the image, What is that supposed to mean? > so, it's quite Newtonian Only approximately, and that is where General Relativity fills the gap in our understanding. So far, only GR can explain, and predict very precisely, the additional motion of the perihelion of orbits as, 200 years after Newton, eventually become measurable with the orbit of Mercury. > and even Galilean the current state of the solar system, No. > while it is yet so that space-contraction-linear and > space-contraction-rotational are in effect, Nonsense. > as with regards to a notion like "fall-gravity" of course. > > I.e., Einstein's later "attack on Newton" is a matter > of mechanics itself as much as about relativity and > mass-energy-equivalency, getting into why the gyroscopic > effects as of the kinematic up after "pseudo"-momentum > and the space-contraction-rotational, has that Einstein's > second and much-less-well-known mass-energy-equivalency > derivation, about the centrally symmetric, helps establish > the concern overall as, "un-linear", for a potentialistic > theory and sum-of-potentials and revisiting the Lagrangian > the severe abstraction the mechanical reduction. Pseudo-scientific word salad. Sadly, your mind is still very confused. F'up2 sci.physics.relativity -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-04 03:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Orbits of planets in the Sol System |
| Message-ID | <10gqrns$2m2qk$2@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #894638 |
Ross Finlayson wrote: > notions like Kepler's banishment of epicycles and as > after about Bode's law The _Titius–Bode_ law (1766/1772) was proposed much later than Kepler (16th century), obviously. And to date nobody understands why it approximately works for the Sol System: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titius–Bode_law> > then as for inverse square the Keplerian geometric way Yes, Kepler's idea was that the "harmonics of the world" would be represented by inscribed Platonic solids to determine the distances between the orbits of the Planets. However, he was scientist enough to accept eventually that, given Tycho Brahe's detailed observations, the circular orbits that resulted from that would not work: ellipses were required. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler#Astronomy> > then that the Newtonian "System of the World" after > the Keplerian "System of the World" or Harmonisches Mundi _/harmonices mundi/_ (Latin for "_harmonics_ of the world") > after the Muslim "System of the Heavens" Doubtful. Kepler was a devout Christian who sought to discover/understand "God's design of the Universe". > and that, that, in the solar system today, > the force vector of gravity always points at the > source not the image, What is that supposed to mean? > so, it's quite Newtonian Only approximately, and that is where General Relativity fills the gap in our understanding. So far, only GR can explain, and predict very precisely, the additional motion of the perihelion of orbits as, 200 years after Newton, eventually became measurable with the orbit of Mercury. > and even Galilean the current state of the solar system, No. > while it is yet so that space-contraction-linear and > space-contraction-rotational are in effect, Nonsense. > as with regards to a notion like "fall-gravity" of course. > > I.e., Einstein's later "attack on Newton" is a matter > of mechanics itself as much as about relativity and > mass-energy-equivalency, getting into why the gyroscopic > effects as of the kinematic up after "pseudo"-momentum > and the space-contraction-rotational, has that Einstein's > second and much-less-well-known mass-energy-equivalency > derivation, about the centrally symmetric, helps establish > the concern overall as, "un-linear", for a potentialistic > theory and sum-of-potentials and revisiting the Lagrangian > the severe abstraction the mechanical reduction. Pseudo-scientific word salad. Sadly, your mind is still very confused. F'up2 sci.physics.relativity -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 20:35 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) |
| Message-ID | <10gnf24$2e7cc$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #894608 |
Mild Shock wrote: > Don't you have a newsreader where you can see the message source. I do. In fact, I happen to use one of the same family of newsreaders as you, if the User-Agent header field of your messages is not forged. > You don't need more information than Mild Shock in the message Wrong. Politeness suggests that one introduces oneself to strangers by telling them one's real name. This is Usenet, not a chat group. > body, you see everything in the message headers. You should try that next time before you complain: Followup-To poster *again* > [top post] *facepalm* -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 23:22 +0100 |
| Subject | Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish (Re: newsreader where you can see the message source) |
| Message-ID | <10gnoqv$11ioa$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #894623 |
Hi, Since I am top posting, and not interleaved posting, and hence not responding to your gibberish. What makes you think I am interested in your gibberish? Could you explain yourself? Bye Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb: > Mild Shock wrote: >> Don't you have a newsreader where you can see the message source. > > I do. In fact, I happen to use one of the same family of newsreaders as > you, if the User-Agent header field of your messages is not forged. > >> You don't need more information than Mild Shock in the message > > Wrong. Politeness suggests that one introduces oneself to strangers by > telling them one's real name. This is Usenet, not a chat group. > >> body, you see everything in the message headers. > > You should try that next time before you complain: > > Followup-To poster *again* > >> [top post] > > *facepalm* >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 23:28 +0100 |
| Subject | Is it like "Wirres Mückengelaber" ? (Was: Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish) |
| Message-ID | <10gnp74$11ioa$3@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #894627 |
Hi, de.sci.mathematik has an interesting thread "Wirres Mückengelaber" . Ist Spock aka Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn the equivalent of Prof. Mückeheim, only in sci.physics.relativity. Could be, who knows? Do you need some medication... Bye Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > Since I am top posting, and not interleaved posting, > and hence not responding to your gibberish. What makes > you think I am interested in your gibberish? > > Could you explain yourself? > > Bye > > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb: >> Mild Shock wrote: >>> Don't you have a newsreader where you can see the message source. >> >> I do. In fact, I happen to use one of the same family of newsreaders as >> you, if the User-Agent header field of your messages is not forged. >> >>> You don't need more information than Mild Shock in the message >> >> Wrong. Politeness suggests that one introduces oneself to strangers by >> telling them one's real name. This is Usenet, not a chat group. >> >>> body, you see everything in the message headers. >> >> You should try that next time before you complain: >> >> Followup-To poster *again* >> >>> [top post] >> >> *facepalm* >> >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 00:11 +0100 |
| Subject | newsreader where you can see the message source (Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) |
| Message-ID | <10gl7a4$u42u$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #894607 |
Hi, Don't you have a newsreader where you can see the message source. You don't need more information than Mild Shock in the message body, you see everything in the message headers. For example I see in your message: From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars @ web.de> Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; logging-data="2349822"; mail-complaints-to="abuse @ open-news-network.org" So you posted from INWX GmbH? Still you give advice how to format a USENET post, even you are not able to see the message source, of my posts? You can easily read off who I am. Maybe get a decend news reader before you give advice how to post. Fucking 5 year old imbecil, get lost in your kindergarden. Bye Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb: > Mild Shock wrote: > ^^^^^^^^^^ > Please repair this. > >> Subject: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious > hypothesis) > > The correct way to change the Subject is "... (was: ...)". Then some > newsreaders can automatically remove the " (was: ...)" part on composing a > follow-up. > >> What if the planets in certain galaxies >> form a turning machine. > > They do not. > > You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer science > to natural science. > > Also, you should learn how to post. This was a completely new question, so > you should not have posted it as a follow-up. Also, you should not have > top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the > previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business communication, but > not in Usenet. It is also not appropriate to crosspost without Followup-To > to *one* newsgroup set. > > I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or > consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about > the communication medium that you are using here. Lest you be killfiled > rather quickly by people. > >> Could Keppler > > Johannes _Kepler_ > >> have modelled a 3 planet system. > > Yes, he did, but not exactly. > >> Can we model a 3 planet system now ? > > Obviously; there are simulations of the Sol System e.g. in Universe Sandbox. > But the 3-body-problem is not about 3 planets, but more general. > > There is no *general* *exact* solution to this problem; just a solution for > the *restricted* 3-body-problem in which one of the objects has a very large > mass; the second object, e.g. a gas giant like Jupiter, has a smaller mass > and is very far away from the first object; and the third object. e.g. an > asteroid, has a small that is small enough to be negligible, and is > comparably far away from the first and second object, respectively. > > And this is neglecting general-relativistic corrections that lead to an > additional contribution in the precession of the perihelia (orbits are not > actually ellipses, closed curves). > > F'up2 sci.physics >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-03 07:22 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? |
| Message-ID | <mpa2stFhnntU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #894607 |
Am Montag000001, 01.12.2025 um 23:45 schrieb Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn: > Mild Shock wrote: > ^^^^^^^^^^ > Please repair this. > >> Subject: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious > hypothesis) > > The correct way to change the Subject is "... (was: ...)". Then some > newsreaders can automatically remove the " (was: ...)" part on composing a > follow-up. > >> What if the planets in certain galaxies >> form a turning machine. > > They do not. > > You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer science > to natural science. > > Also, you should learn how to post. This was a completely new question, so > you should not have posted it as a follow-up. Also, you should not have > top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the > previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business communication, but > not in Usenet. It is also not appropriate to crosspost without Followup-To > to *one* newsgroup set. > > I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or > consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about > the communication medium that you are using here. Lest you be killfiled > rather quickly by people. > >> Could Keppler > > Johannes _Kepler_ Sure. Btw: once and many years ago I had neighbors, who had the name 'Kepler' and were actually the grand-grand-grand-somethings of Johannes Kepler. They were actually the main reason, why I had decided to become interested in physics. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-03 08:27 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? |
| Message-ID | <42p0jk1ps7f7129ij8u9pjv3f2rqav3pma@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #894632 |
On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 07:22:11 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: >Am Montag000001, 01.12.2025 um 23:45 schrieb Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn: >> Mild Shock wrote: >> ^^^^^^^^^^ >> Please repair this. >> >>> Subject: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious >> hypothesis) >> >> The correct way to change the Subject is "... (was: ...)". Then some >> newsreaders can automatically remove the " (was: ...)" part on composing a >> follow-up. >> >>> What if the planets in certain galaxies >>> form a turning machine. >> >> They do not. >> >> You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer science >> to natural science. >> >> Also, you should learn how to post. This was a completely new question, so >> you should not have posted it as a follow-up. Also, you should not have >> top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the >> previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business communication, but >> not in Usenet. It is also not appropriate to crosspost without Followup-To >> to *one* newsgroup set. >> >> I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or >> consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about >> the communication medium that you are using here. Lest you be killfiled >> rather quickly by people. >> >>> Could Keppler >> >> Johannes _Kepler_ > >Sure. > >Btw: once and many years ago I had neighbors, who had the name 'Kepler' >and were actually the grand-grand-grand-somethings of Johannes Kepler. > >They were actually the main reason, why I had decided to become >interested in physics. > >TH > > If your neighbor was Aldoph Hitler you'd probably be posting from Argentina right now...Dr. Heger! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-04 07:57 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? |
| Message-ID | <mpcpbvF147lU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #894639 |
Am Mittwoch000003, 03.12.2025 um 17:27 schrieb The Starmaker: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 07:22:11 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> > wrote: > >> Am Montag000001, 01.12.2025 um 23:45 schrieb Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn: >>> Mild Shock wrote: >>> ^^^^^^^^^^ >>> Please repair this. >>> >>>> Subject: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious >>> hypothesis) >>> >>> The correct way to change the Subject is "... (was: ...)". Then some >>> newsreaders can automatically remove the " (was: ...)" part on composing a >>> follow-up. >>> >>>> What if the planets in certain galaxies >>>> form a turning machine. >>> >>> They do not. >>> >>> You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer science >>> to natural science. >>> >>> Also, you should learn how to post. This was a completely new question, so >>> you should not have posted it as a follow-up. Also, you should not have >>> top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the >>> previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business communication, but >>> not in Usenet. It is also not appropriate to crosspost without Followup-To >>> to *one* newsgroup set. >>> >>> I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or >>> consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about >>> the communication medium that you are using here. Lest you be killfiled >>> rather quickly by people. >>> >>>> Could Keppler >>> >>> Johannes _Kepler_ >> >> Sure. >> >> Btw: once and many years ago I had neighbors, who had the name 'Kepler' >> and were actually the grand-grand-grand-somethings of Johannes Kepler. >> >> They were actually the main reason, why I had decided to become >> interested in physics. >> >> TH >> >> > > If your neighbor was Aldoph Hitler you'd probably be posting from > Argentina right now...Dr. Heger! Why don't you say, that 'Hitler' was my grand-grand-father? That's actually possible, because we had something called 'Lebensborn' in Germany, where 'Arians' were supposed to produce a 'Superrace'. The best 'producer' was allegedly the 'Fuehrer' himself. He could eventually have fathered hundreds of children and nobody would know. Some children are known, however: https://www.mimikama.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020-01-21-12_57_34-12-Recherche-_-Mimikama-Redaktion.jpg TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-30 23:14 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Its a subconscious hypothesis (Was: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) |
| Message-ID | <187ce898e6eb3a39$26534748$2534374$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #894587 |
On 11/30/2025 10:33 PM, Mild Shock wrote: > Hi, > > Well I even don't know why I came up with > the NPM hack hypothesis. Saw something > on youtube. Maybe they just do maintenance. > > In the coming age of analog computing, > symbolic logic means nothing: > > “The high data-rate sense perception and > identification abilities of the human system > mostly bypass verbal/analytic awareness. We > are generally conscious of a cognitive > recognition after the fact. In this way, what > we understand as consciousness has to be > identified as a reflexive monitoring ability > with quite limited application. To produce > consciousness (artificial or otherwise) we > are stepping down, not up.” Consciousness is not to enhance the abilities of a brain, it's for linking brains into a network. Mainly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-01 23:23 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) |
| Message-ID | <10gl4gr$27lcp$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #894586 |
Mild Shock amok-crossposted over 3 newsgroups: > 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable > https://stackoverflow.com/users/855543/pointedears > > LoL So your point is that StackOverflow had a server problem at the time? What does that have to do with me? You appear to have a mental problem instead. Which part of "please do not crosspost mindlessly" did not you not understand? F'up2 poster -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 00:05 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) |
| Message-ID | <10gl706$vv6g$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #894605 |
Hi, > Which part of "please do not crosspost mindlessly" The part that your message header contains a crossposting: From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,comp.theory,sci.physics Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 23:23:24 +0100 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Maybe get a decend news reader before you give advice how to post. Fucking 5 year old imbecil, get lost in your kindergarden. Bye Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb: > Mild Shock amok-crossposted over 3 newsgroups: >> 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable >> https://stackoverflow.com/users/855543/pointedears >> >> LoL > > So your point is that StackOverflow had a server problem at the time? > > What does that have to do with me? > > You appear to have a mental problem instead. Which part of "please do not > crosspost mindlessly" did not you not understand? > > F'up2 poster >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-02 20:29 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services |
| Message-ID | <10gnen7$2e6nm$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #894609 |
Mild Shock wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^ Your *real* name should be found there. > > Which part of "please do not crosspost mindlessly" > > The part that your message header contains a crossposting: > > From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> > Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,comp.theory,sci.physics > Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 23:23:24 +0100 > Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) > > Maybe get a decend news reader before you give advice how to post. It was a crosspost _deliberately with Followup-To set_ *in order to contain your crosspost*: | Followup-To: poster That is why your newsreader > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) > Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.22 told you that I ask for replies by private e-mail. Your ignoring that is a violation of Netiquette. > Fucking 5 year old imbecil, get lost in your kindergarden. I have been using Usenet for more than 3 decades now. But the September never ends... So just "Score adjusted" for now: <http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#not_losing> F'up2 poster again -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web