Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #892785 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-05-18 17:23 -0700 |
| Last post | 2025-06-21 15:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 231 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
"The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-18 17:23 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-18 21:27 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-19 08:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-19 22:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-20 16:57 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-20 08:21 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-20 17:07 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-20 22:27 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-24 23:56 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-26 08:03 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-26 10:47 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-27 09:07 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-05-27 21:37 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-28 08:02 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-28 12:00 -0500
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-05-28 17:11 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-31 08:41 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-05-31 17:28 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-01 09:39 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 17:57 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-02 18:49 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 18:49 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-03 09:11 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 14:41 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:55 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 06:17 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 14:45 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:05 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 01:02 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 00:55 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-01 00:26 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-02 17:43 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-06 00:03 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 01:28 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 12:35 -0500
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-07 23:44 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 07:04 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-08 23:49 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-10 06:56 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-10 18:23 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-11 08:01 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-13 10:14 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-14 09:03 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-14 01:23 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:08 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 09:03 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-15 12:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 03:38 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 09:56 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-18 09:30 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 12:55 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-19 10:02 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-19 01:13 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-19 08:54 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-18 22:41 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-19 01:07 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-20 09:17 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-20 12:00 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-20 12:07 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-20 12:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-21 09:22 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-21 00:50 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-24 12:09 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-24 03:25 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-25 09:41 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-25 10:20 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-25 11:27 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-27 08:04 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" J Carlson <notgenx32@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-27 09:19 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-28 18:28 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-21 09:19 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-24 12:14 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-24 03:28 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-24 10:02 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-27 07:39 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-27 06:04 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-27 09:18 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-27 10:16 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" J Carlson <notgenx32@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-27 11:38 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-27 13:13 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-28 18:32 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-28 10:12 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-13 22:25 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-14 08:38 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-27 23:35 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-25 09:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-25 09:47 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 16:31 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-13 22:23 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-14 08:35 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-07-14 16:58 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-15 20:23 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 16:45 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-07-15 01:50 +0000
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-19 18:15 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-07-21 01:27 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-21 09:02 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-21 19:12 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-21 23:06 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 11:21 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-23 11:24 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-23 13:03 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-23 14:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-23 16:31 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 21:41 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-27 23:38 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 11:25 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-23 22:03 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 14:04 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-23 15:37 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-23 15:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-24 13:00 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-24 13:51 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-25 22:12 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-25 14:11 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:35 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 00:44 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:42 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:49 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 21:17 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 15:26 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-27 13:39 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-27 13:57 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-27 14:33 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" squalk <sq@net.inv> - 2025-07-28 00:05 +0100
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-27 17:03 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:33 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 00:44 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-26 12:01 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 15:29 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-07-27 13:00 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-07-27 17:33 +0000
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-27 11:06 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-27 11:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-28 20:38 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 21:43 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 19:51 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 19:51 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-27 23:34 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-28 01:47 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-02 23:47 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-28 20:43 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-14 04:01 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 13:09 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 13:11 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-20 15:13 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 22:41 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-07-24 11:11 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-24 13:15 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-25 22:12 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 00:42 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-26 12:02 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-26 14:43 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-27 10:22 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-27 13:37 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-26 13:53 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-06-30 22:56 -0500
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 09:49 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-18 09:30 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 12:58 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-15 18:09 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 14:09 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-16 15:08 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 12:39 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-16 17:37 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:36 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-15 10:08 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-06-15 17:52 +0000
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 03:44 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-18 22:17 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-15 11:25 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 16:32 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-15 17:59 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 03:46 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:04 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-18 09:30 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 13:00 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-18 06:56 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:44 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 23:02 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 20:05 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 03:40 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-15 18:44 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-16 09:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-16 16:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-17 00:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:23 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 13:06 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-18 15:41 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-18 13:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 06:12 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-19 07:12 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 12:28 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-19 16:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-18 14:47 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 14:53 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:07 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-18 09:18 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-19 09:36 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-19 08:54 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-18 09:30 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-19 09:58 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-19 01:23 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-20 09:26 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-20 12:01 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-21 09:13 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-21 00:49 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-19 08:54 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-20 09:38 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-20 12:01 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 13:02 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-18 13:09 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-18 15:15 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Craig <x@y.com> - 2025-06-18 18:25 +0000
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 20:54 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-14 19:57 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-15 18:13 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 18:49 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 09:53 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Oleg Smirnov" <os333@netc.eu> - 2025-06-15 14:45 +0300
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:27 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Oleg Smirnov" <os333@netc.eu> - 2025-06-17 16:25 +0300
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:28 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Oleg Smirnov" <os333@netc.eu> - 2025-06-19 12:55 +0300
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-01 23:10 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 23:13 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-18 23:47 -0500
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 15:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 15:45 -0700
Page 12 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-15 09:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mb7catFphl9U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #893245 |
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 00:49 schrieb Governor Swill: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:01:43 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> > wrote: > >> English had a HUGE number of ancestors, who had left their marks in the >> English language. >> >> Keltic languages >> Latin >> Danish >> French >> German >> Dutch >> Hindi >> Kisuaheli > > All stemming from Indo-European. Sanskrit. > I would go that far to say, that Englishmen speak Sanskrit. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Oleg Smirnov" <os333@netc.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-15 14:45 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <102mbs4$sshv$2@os.motzarella.org> |
| In reply to | #893103 |
Thomas Heger, <news:man86vF2uddU2@mid.individual.net> > Am Freitag000006, 06.06.2025 um 08:03 schrieb Gronk: >>> Prussian disappeared in the 17th century - before globalization. >>> Conquest, military and non military can wipe out small languages. >>> Cultures can be absorbed by larger ones leading to loss of a language. >>> Russian is as common as Ukrainian in Ukraine. The so called Ukrainian in the so called Ukraine is mostly a product of the Polish colonization for about three centuries, when in the territory of the present day western & central Uraine most of the upper-class, landowners and urbanites, were Polish or Jewish while the populace, peasants were "Ukrainian". >>> There are a few common >>> second languages today. English, French, Japanese, Spanish, Italian >>> and lately Chinese. > > German was actually a 'lingua franca', too. Indeed, - before the WW1, and also, then Germany had a big real chance to be another "center of world", but then it had been eventually bondaged and disciplined. > Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. > > Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult. > > The language itself has also disadvantages. > > This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to > call 'manuals'. > > These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence > the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the translator's expenses. Their vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes to cheap products. They simply do not care. But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales then be sure there will be a good manual. > English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for most > speakers of English as a second language: > > English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million) > > English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. Basically English is simple and especially convenient for writing and reading. Small number of letters, no diacritics and the like. Many "rules" may (and/or should) be ignored. ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-17 07:27 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mbcch0Fk6clU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #893303 |
Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 13:45 schrieb Oleg Smirnov: ... >> Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >> >> Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult. >> >> The language itself has also disadvantages. >> >> This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like >> to call 'manuals'. >> >> These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. > > Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a > language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive > because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the > translator's expenses. Their > vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for > itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes > to cheap products. They simply do not care. > But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales > then be sure there will be a good manual. Products do not speak for themselves. Products themselves are actually only half of what the customers want. Usually manuals, software, warranties, repair service, parts supply, service manuals, advertising of the brand, fashion or similar are also part of what costumers want. So: a good company would take care of their market and would provide things like spare parts or installation services. But China is doing mainly manufactoring and in many cases nothing more than that and simple shipping stuff abroad in plastic bags. Instead of a manual these manufacturers put tiny pieces of paper into the box, which contain almost unreadable advices in five to ten different languages. >> English has disadvantages, too, but which are quite irrelevant for >> most speakers of English as a second language: >> >> English has an insane amout of diffent words (~one million) >> >> English has also a number of totally illogic rules and special cases. > > Basically English is simple and especially convenient for > writing and reading. Small number of letters, no diacritics > and the like. Many "rules" may (and/or should) be ignored. > English could be stripped town to bare minimum and still remains undertandable. But that isn't English anymore, but kind of 'Pidgin-Redneck-dialect'. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Oleg Smirnov" <os333@netc.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-17 16:25 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <102rqet$2dneo$1@os.motzarella.org> |
| In reply to | #893352 |
Thomas Heger, <news:mbcch0Fk6clU6@mid.individual.net> > Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 13:45 schrieb Oleg Smirnov: >>> Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>> >>> Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult. >>> >>> The language itself has also disadvantages. >>> >>> This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>> call 'manuals'. >>> >>> These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >> >> Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a >> language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive >> because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the >> translator's expenses. Their >> vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for >> itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes >> to cheap products. They simply do not care. >> But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales >> then be sure there will be a good manual. > > Products do not speak for themselves. > > Products themselves are actually only half of what the customers want. > > Usually manuals, software, warranties, repair service, parts supply, > service manuals, advertising of the brand, fashion or similar are also > part of what costumers want. > > So: a good company would take care of their market and would provide > things like spare parts or installation services. > > But China is doing mainly manufactoring and in many cases nothing more > than that and simple shipping stuff abroad in plastic bags. > > Instead of a manual these manufacturers put tiny pieces of paper into the > box, which contain almost unreadable advices in five to ten different > languages. Consumers may claim they want this and that, but what consumers really want is what they are really willing to pay money for, so as long as a product is well-sellable, there's no necessity to take the vocalism (if any) of [some part of] consumers to heart. If you dislike it then simply don't buy it. Developing theories about inferiority of language and the like is surely not a good rationalization.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-18 10:28 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mbfbhgF4kotU12@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #893359 |
Am Dienstag000017, 17.06.2025 um 15:25 schrieb Oleg Smirnov: > Thomas Heger, <news:mbcch0Fk6clU6@mid.individual.net> >> Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 13:45 schrieb Oleg Smirnov: > >>>> Chinese on the other hand is no language you like to learn for fun. >>>> >>>> Especially writing in Chinese is REALLY difficult. >>>> >>>> The language itself has also disadvantages. >>>> >>>> This can be seen in many translations from Chinese in what they like to >>>> call 'manuals'. >>>> >>>> These little papers reveal a lack of something called 'grammar', hence >>>> the language has a lack of possibility to express certain subtle ideas. >>> >>> Not a good rationalization, seems Nazi-like, and it's not really a >>> language feature. The modern Chinese-made goods are highly competitive >>> because production is optimized to minimize costs, including the >>> translator's expenses. Their >>> vendors' approach is so that the product should speak for >>> itself as such without a nicely written manual, especially when it comes >>> to cheap products. They simply do not care. >>> But if it turns out that a good manual is important for increasing sales >>> then be sure there will be a good manual. >> >> Products do not speak for themselves. >> >> Products themselves are actually only half of what the customers want. >> >> Usually manuals, software, warranties, repair service, parts supply, >> service manuals, advertising of the brand, fashion or similar are also >> part of what costumers want. >> >> So: a good company would take care of their market and would provide >> things like spare parts or installation services. >> >> But China is doing mainly manufactoring and in many cases nothing more >> than that and simple shipping stuff abroad in plastic bags. >> >> Instead of a manual these manufacturers put tiny pieces of paper into the >> box, which contain almost unreadable advices in five to ten different >> languages. > > Consumers may claim they want this and that, but what consumers > really want is what they are really willing to pay money for, so > as long as a product is well-sellable, there's no necessity to > take the vocalism (if any) of [some part of] consumers to heart. > If you dislike it then simply don't buy it. Developing theories > about inferiority of language and the like is surely not a good > rationalization. I personally think, that the Chineese themselves are not really happy with their language and their way of writing. These are very nasty problems, once you want to go into international trade. Costumers usually want all things possible and for zero price. But that is't possible, of course. So, some sort of negotians are requried about would shall be delivered and what is not necessary. Most likely a good manual in the language of your country will a standard for all products in the future. TH >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Oleg Smirnov" <os333@netc.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-19 12:55 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <1030mv1$3qf32$1@os.motzarella.org> |
| In reply to | #893378 |
Thomas Heger, <news:mbfbhgF4kotU12@mid.individual.net> > Am Dienstag000017, 17.06.2025 um 15:25 schrieb Oleg Smirnov: >> If you dislike it then simply don't buy it. Developing theories >> about inferiority of language and the like is surely not a good >> rationalization. > > I personally think, that the Chineese themselves are not really happy with > their language and their way of writing. Narrower focus on the way of writing seems much more relevant. One of sensitive differences between alphabetic script vs writing with hieroglyphs is related to borrowing of foreign terms/words. In an alphabetic writing, you simply represent a foreign word - adapted to your phonetics - in your alphabet (like "sputnik" or "juchten"), and it's also applicable to foreign proper nouns. In a hieroglyphic writing, appropriation of foreign terms and proper nouns is more tricky. In the context of catch-up development, it's what those Chinese themselves might feel unhappy about. But it's not equal to "language lacking of possibility to express ideas". In particular, so was a rationale to switch Vietnam to a Latin- based alphabet. French colonial administration together with then Vietnamese ruling class decided that switching to an alphabetic script will make introduction of new concepts more digestible for local populace, while the underlying agenda was to promote novel progressive European trends there. But switching to a new writing system brings also certain losses, because next generations will be unable to read original old texts related to national cultural tradition (but, on the other hand, with the modern development of machine translation such considerations may become much less important). In broader context, Chinese writing started early, their division of labour (variety of social-economic roles and professional occupations within society, that contributes to language richness) also emerged early, - earlier than in Europe. And in contrast to some other ancient cultures, the cutural tradition was maintained uninterruptedly (although it significantly shifted backward some times throughout history, when simpler nomads from the north took over sedentary Chinese regions). So it'd be naive to think their language isn't rich enough in expressive means, but another issue is about good translation for Europeans, as the language (its all dialectal branches) is not close to the Indo-European family. > These are very nasty problems, once you want to go into international > trade. > > Costumers usually want all things possible and for zero price. > > But that is't possible, of course. > > So, some sort of negotians are requried about would shall be delivered and > what is not necessary. > > Most likely a good manual in the language of your country will a standard > for all products in the future. If you buy a product from a known / "big" Chinese brand, then an instruction there will likely be OK, and if you buy a cheap product from a little known or no-name vendor then there may well be a paper with hieroglyphs on one side and some Latin letters looking like a heavily broken English on the other side.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-01 23:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <101jboq$31e57$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #892906 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Thomas Heger wrote: >> >> Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk: > I'm surprised you didin't add it is also a name of a cat food brand in > Afganastian!!!! It is? Cite?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-31 23:13 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <101gni5$1qfp8$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #892902 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Sonntag000025, 25.05.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Gronk: >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> >>>> Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 17:58 schrieb The Starmaker: >>>>> "Klaatu barada nikto"???? >>>>> >>>>> Easy, it comes from Albert Einstein language...German!!!! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> KLAATU means I'm the victory of the people in the German language. >>>> >>>> This is not German! >>>> >>>> I have read, that this sentence means: >>>> >>>> God will not destroy the Earth (possibly: this time?). >>> >>> You are not thinking like an einstein...Klaatu in German >> >> Not German. Estonian >> >> https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=klaatu&op=translate > > 'Klaatu barada nikto" > > Seems to be composed from three different Eastern European languages: > > Klaatu is Estionian and means 'cloak' > barada is Russian and means 'nobody' > nikto is Slovak and means 'nobody'. Not one of the German.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-18 23:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <100ed5p$16av$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #892785 |
On 5/18/25 7:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Albert Einstein was the director, the producer and the screenwriter of the movie entitled "The Day The Earth Stood Still" 1951. > > Of course Albert Einstein used a ghostwriter (which in those day that is what the 'communists' writers did) > > > Here is a link to the movie script: > > https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/the_day_the_earth_stood_still.html > > > Here is the full free movie: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh8P4MIaZBA > > https://archive.org/details/The.Day.The.Earth.Stood.Still1951 > > > First , where did the Albert Einstein get the idea of the title of the movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still" ???? > > > Since Albert Einstein is the designer and architect of 'The Atomic Bomb', and launched The Manhattan Project, > > Albert Einstein got the idea from an incident mentioned in the newspapers at his time: > > "In support of this there are stories of the experiences of automobile drivers in the vicinity of Los Alamos. > According to these their radios and motors stopped suddenly at the same instant and after 15 or 20 minutes suddenly began to operate as usual." > > https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/20/worst-manhattan-project-leaks/ > https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1944-Cleveland-Press-Forbidden-City.pdf > > > KLAATU > (after a moment, > quietly) > You see -- the electricity's been > neutralized -- all over the world. > > The impact of this calm, quiet statement is shattering. Helen > stares at him awe-struck. Then she speaks numbly, almost > inaudibly. > > HELEN > Bobby was telling the truth -- wasn't > he? > > Klaatu stares at her evenly, as we-- > > DISSOLVE TO: > > MED. SHOT - STREET > > All vehicular traffic in the street is at a dead stop. > Automobiles, busses, trolley cars -- all are stalled. Drivers > and passengers are climbing out of the vehicles in utter > bewilderment. Except for the people, it is as though the > street had been frozen in motion. > > > > > Yep, you're still stuck in those years. A good movie with a funky ending. Could be Trump saw that and now is trying to imitate Kaatu with Iran. Trump was 7 years old when he saw it. And stayed a 7-year-old since.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-21 15:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1037cdg$1asm4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #892785 |
On 5/18/2025 5:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: [...] WWIII might actually occur! Not 100% sure, but it seems to be a critical situation. Crossing fingers! https://youtu.be/IXvwQ1_REBE?list=RD_p6okLK3sq0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-21 15:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1037clr$1atnn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #893483 |
On 6/21/2025 3:40 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 5/18/2025 5:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > [...] > > WWIII might actually occur! Not 100% sure, but it seems to be a critical > situation. Crossing fingers! > > https://youtu.be/IXvwQ1_REBE?list=RD_p6okLK3sq0 > If we really go into ww3, well, shit. Damn it. https://youtu.be/a1KFFPeJ8BI?list=RD_p6okLK3sq0
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web