Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #891708 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-03-07 22:00 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-04-10 00:57 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 125 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-07 22:00 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> - 2025-03-08 12:26 +1300
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-03-08 12:03 +1100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-08 07:09 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-08 22:46 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Phil <phil@anonymous.invalid> - 2025-03-08 22:58 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-03-09 00:38 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2025-03-09 01:30 -0500
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-09 06:55 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-30 23:09 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-03-09 11:27 +0100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 13:58 -0500
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum jerry.friedman99@gmail.com (jerryfriedman) - 2025-03-10 15:01 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-03-10 19:04 +0100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum jerry.friedman99@gmail.com (jerryfriedman) - 2025-03-10 20:31 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-30 23:30 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-03-09 20:50 +1100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-03-10 03:54 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum jerry.friedman99@gmail.com (jerryfriedman) - 2025-03-10 19:16 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Bertitaylor @novabbs.org (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-10 21:55 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum jerry.friedman99@gmail.com (jerryfriedman) - 2025-03-12 16:21 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-12 23:35 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-03-13 11:32 +1100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 23:29 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-13 04:00 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-30 23:54 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-03-13 13:15 +1100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-03-13 09:08 +0100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-26 22:54 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-26 16:12 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-26 23:55 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-26 17:44 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-03-27 02:10 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-27 08:07 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-27 22:40 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-27 17:35 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-28 02:07 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-27 20:38 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-28 04:21 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-30 23:04 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-30 16:38 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-08 02:36 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-04-07 20:33 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-08 05:38 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-04-08 08:09 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum x <x@x.org> - 2025-04-08 14:57 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-09 13:05 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-04-09 07:45 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-09 21:13 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-04-09 14:43 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-10 22:13 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-10 22:41 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-03-12 11:58 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 11:50 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-03-12 22:01 +0100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-03-13 11:37 +1100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-03-13 09:08 +0100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Phil <phil@anonymous.invalid> - 2025-03-13 10:33 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-12 23:43 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2025-03-10 09:14 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-03-10 15:16 +0100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-31 04:01 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-13 23:37 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum jerry.friedman99@gmail.com (jerryfriedman) - 2025-03-10 19:54 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-03-11 11:29 +1100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 21:05 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-03-11 20:23 +1100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-11 10:04 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 11:46 -0500
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-11 20:31 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 04:47 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum jerry.friedman99@gmail.com (jerryfriedman) - 2025-03-11 14:56 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 11:56 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-31 03:54 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-31 03:21 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-11 10:23 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-12 00:15 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-11 00:37 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:07 -0500
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-11 05:00 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 11:23 -0500
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-11 21:59 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-08 15:00 -0800
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-03-09 01:04 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-08 17:50 -0800
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-03-09 02:21 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-08 20:36 -0800
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-03-09 21:21 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-09 15:18 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 21:28 -0500
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-03-10 03:16 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-08 21:21 -0600
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-31 02:49 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 22:51 -0500
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-07 21:51 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-08 05:39 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-07 16:11 -0800
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-27 22:49 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-27 17:37 -0700
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-03-09 21:05 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-03-10 03:19 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-03-10 14:55 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-11 20:19 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-03-12 11:40 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-12 20:05 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-03-26 17:08 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-26 21:33 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-26 18:21 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-26 22:31 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-27 00:14 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-27 05:53 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-27 22:33 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-03-27 10:32 +1100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-27 00:04 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-26 23:58 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-03-27 12:59 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-27 21:40 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-04-07 16:18 -0400
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-07 21:35 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-03-13 11:47 +1100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-03-13 09:08 +0100
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-13 08:19 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-30 22:00 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-09 21:09 +0000
Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-10 00:57 +0000
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-11 11:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vqpo1r$1bj8c$3@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #891765 |
On 3/11/25 12:00 AM, Bertietaylor wrote: > On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 4:07:38 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: > >> >> On 3/10/25 7:37 PM, Bertitaylor wrote: >>> As pressure is force divided by area there cannot be pressure where >>> force is zero. >> >> >> You keep making this mistake. Your grasp of physics is like those in >> junior high, and that's why I think you are a high school drop out. > > Wrong as always you are, Roachie. Your knowledge of physics is lower by > far than a bee. >> >> And since you're surrounded here by fucking "engineers", nobody can >> correct you or make you understand this. > > > Engineers know far far better physics than the current crop of > pseudoscientific scoundrels posing as physicists. They have the highest > contempt for these frauds who abuse maths to promote their nonsense > theories. Having nothing useful to do, unlike engineers, these creatures > spend their time sucking up to politicians for funding their weird > antics. Computer art is now their greatest friend! All sorts of rubbish > are made to appear true with their graphic presentation of absolute > rubbish. >> >> So I have to again spend my dick's time to do what they couldn't :-( >> Fucking assholes. > > Not having the wits for math abuse nor computer art you are left with > mere abuse with the hope that will give you a credibility of sorts to > the brainwashed. >> >> Net force of gravity is of course zero at the center of the Earth. But >> not higher up! And since all these forces higher up are "press"ing the >> material downward toward the center symmetrically, the resulting >> pressure of electromagnetic nature > > Looks like you have heard of something called electromagnetic but you do > not have a clue about it > > > As a joke you are passable, Roachie. > > > > is conducted downward all the way to >> the center of the Earth, from all directions, creating enormous >> pressure, cause such pressures won't cancel each other out, but add. > > > Just a stupid statement from one who has no clue that when there is no > force there cannot be any pressure for pressure is force divided by > area. > > There is no net force at the core for the forces go all around as in a > done. No pressure under a dome unlike the pressure you get from the flat > rock under which you reside, Roachie. >> >> A simpler example is if you stand in a street and two identical trucks >> press you from front and back with equal forces, net force on you will >> be zero but the pressure from electromagnetic forces at contact surfaces >> of trucks and your body on your two sides will not cancel out. They add >> and will crush you. > > Plain rubbish in many ways. Firstly it is a wrong analogy. The dome > analogy suits the Earth core pressure situation, not trucks colliding > with velocities. Dishonest as always you are, Roachie but that is only > normal for a physicist who is licensed to bullshit. > There is extraordinary force from the pressures on both sides doing the > crushing. Force from pressure is always there, just got to be, causing > distortion to the body > Thirdly no em forces are involved. To pretend they do further > demonstrates your dishonesty. > > If Trump really wants to Maga he must sack all physicists if they do not > follow Arindam's physics. > > Woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof > > Bertietaylor > > -- You're handled when I fart you out after you kill yourself. My dick explained the process for others who were confused. They keep talking about pressure without mentioning (or even noticing perhaps) the symmetry involved. Symmetry is the key here. That's how pressures add instead of setting things in motion. Hindu scientists will kill you on the spot for what you're doing here to them, Arindam. That's probably why you're somewhere in Australian desert.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-11 21:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <75ac2942ffc5cf3cf3520b8bd7597383@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #891775 |
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:23:23 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 3/11/25 12:00 AM, Bertietaylor wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 4:07:38 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: >> >>> >>> On 3/10/25 7:37 PM, Bertitaylor wrote: >>>> As pressure is force divided by area there cannot be pressure where >>>> force is zero. >>> >>> >>> You keep making this mistake. Your grasp of physics is like those in >>> junior high, and that's why I think you are a high school drop out. >> >> Wrong as always you are, Roachie. Your knowledge of physics is lower by >> far than a bee. >>> >>> And since you're surrounded here by fucking "engineers", nobody can >>> correct you or make you understand this. >> >> >> Engineers know far far better physics than the current crop of >> pseudoscientific scoundrels posing as physicists. They have the highest >> contempt for these frauds who abuse maths to promote their nonsense >> theories. Having nothing useful to do, unlike engineers, these creatures >> spend their time sucking up to politicians for funding their weird >> antics. Computer art is now their greatest friend! All sorts of rubbish >> are made to appear true with their graphic presentation of absolute >> rubbish. >>> >>> So I have to again spend my dick's time to do what they couldn't :-( >>> Fucking assholes. >> >> Not having the wits for math abuse nor computer art you are left with >> mere abuse with the hope that will give you a credibility of sorts to >> the brainwashed. >>> >>> Net force of gravity is of course zero at the center of the Earth. But >>> not higher up! And since all these forces higher up are "press"ing the >>> material downward toward the center symmetrically, the resulting >>> pressure of electromagnetic nature >> >> Looks like you have heard of something called electromagnetic but you do >> not have a clue about it >> >> >> As a joke you are passable, Roachie. >> >> >> >> is conducted downward all the way to >>> the center of the Earth, from all directions, creating enormous >>> pressure, cause such pressures won't cancel each other out, but add. >> >> >> Just a stupid statement from one who has no clue that when there is no >> force there cannot be any pressure for pressure is force divided by >> area. >> >> There is no net force at the core for the forces go all around as in a >> done. No pressure under a dome unlike the pressure you get from the flat >> rock under which you reside, Roachie. >>> >>> A simpler example is if you stand in a street and two identical trucks >>> press you from front and back with equal forces, net force on you will >>> be zero but the pressure from electromagnetic forces at contact surfaces >>> of trucks and your body on your two sides will not cancel out. They add >>> and will crush you. >> >> Plain rubbish in many ways. Firstly it is a wrong analogy. The dome >> analogy suits the Earth core pressure situation, not trucks colliding >> with velocities. Dishonest as always you are, Roachie but that is only >> normal for a physicist who is licensed to bullshit. >> There is extraordinary force from the pressures on both sides doing the >> crushing. Force from pressure is always there, just got to be, causing >> distortion to the body >> Thirdly no em forces are involved. To pretend they do further >> demonstrates your dishonesty. >> >> If Trump really wants to Maga he must sack all physicists if they do not >> follow Arindam's physics. >> >> Woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof >> >> Bertietaylor >> >> -- > > > You're handled when I fart you out after you kill yourself. My dick > explained the process for others who were confused. As you are a dickhead indeed your dick does all your talking, Roachie. Indeed there is no end to that prick which is you, Roachie. Like an anaconda, what. All dick. > > They keep talking about pressure without mentioning (or even noticing > perhaps) the symmetry involved. Symmetry is the key here. That's how > pressures add instead of setting things in motion. Symmetry that is realistic for the geometry of stars and planets - of overlapping and underlapping domes representing the spherical sutfaces - ensures zero force, zero pressure, zero temperature at their cores. Correct! > > Hindu scientists will kill you on the spot for what you're doing here to > them, Arindam. That's probably why you're somewhere in Australian > desert. Tch, tch, Roachie. Evil freak, your crowd funding efforts to find an assassin to kill Arindam has not worked. Killers have their principles. They will kill all those who bear thoughts about killing Divine Arindam. So watch out, toxic creep. Best return to your spot under some flat rock or dark hole. Woof woof woof woof-woof woof Bet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-08 15:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3puu9l-vul9.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #891720 |
In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: <snip old crap> > Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net > gravitational force or pressure is zero. Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. But what can one expect from a barking mad crackpot?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-09 01:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <c5c8b000ac4259286df85cf3946e00d7@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #891722 |
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > > <snip old crap> > >> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >> gravitational force or pressure is zero. > > Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded and ignorant as ever. Lost cause! > > But what can one expect from a barking mad crackpot? Laughable wretch, JimPee the Penisnino! Woof-woof woof woof Arindam >> da Vinci, as Arindam foresaw back in 1999 with his formula for free energy e=0.5mVVN(N-k) that upsets the silly laws of thermodynamics. Now the Chinese have used permanent magnets to create free energy, and selling such motors galore in alibaba.com What fools these Eurocentric baboons be! woof-woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-08 17:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <uo8v9l-sg3a.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #891724 |
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> >> <snip old crap> >> >>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >> >> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. > > Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded > and ignorant as ever. So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-09 02:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3541b1ecb767f6949ac5eab85966cd18@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #891725 |
On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 1:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> <snip old crap> >>> >>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >>> >>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. >> >> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded >> and ignorant as ever. > > So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a > pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot? Suns and planets are not equivalent to tires and pressure cookers, o stupid, pigheaded and ignorant JimPee the Penisnino. See if you can get this basic fact into your fat head. For one thing, the former are very very large mostly solid spheres. Woof-woof, what incredible fools these Eurocentric baboons be! Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs) --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-08 20:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <lfiv9l-gvda.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #891726 |
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 1:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> <snip old crap> >>>> >>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >>>> >>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. >>> >>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded >>> and ignorant as ever. >> >> So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a >> pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot? > > > > Suns and planets are not equivalent to tires and pressure cookers, o > stupid, pigheaded and ignorant JimPee the Penisnino. Yes, and that was exactly the point, barking mad crackpot, i.e. gravity can cause pressure in some circumstances but gravity is an entirely different thing than pressure and has different units.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-09 21:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1ca4c046ff619a7f2c8c6989e8014f98@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #891729 |
On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 4:36:39 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 1:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <snip old crap> >>>>> >>>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >>>>> >>>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. >>>> >>>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded >>>> and ignorant as ever. >>> >>> So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a >>> pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot? >> >> >> >> Suns and planets are not equivalent to tires and pressure cookers, o >> stupid, pigheaded and ignorant JimPee the Penisnino. > > Yes, and that was exactly the point, barking mad crackpot, i.e. gravity > can cause pressure in some circumstances but gravity is an entirely > different thing than pressure and has different units. One cannot know whether to laugh of cry by such absurdity. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-09 15:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <plg1al-udtc.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #891737 |
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 4:36:39 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 1:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip old crap> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>>>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. >>>>> >>>>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded >>>>> and ignorant as ever. >>>> >>>> So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a >>>> pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot? >>> >>> >>> >>> Suns and planets are not equivalent to tires and pressure cookers, o >>> stupid, pigheaded and ignorant JimPee the Penisnino. >> >> Yes, and that was exactly the point, barking mad crackpot, i.e. gravity >> can cause pressure in some circumstances but gravity is an entirely >> different thing than pressure and has different units. > > One cannot know whether to laugh of cry by such absurdity. Are you referring to your insane absurities, Arindam?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-09 21:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vqlio1$19gai$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #891737 |
On 3/9/25 4:21 PM, bertietaylor wrote: > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 4:36:39 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 1:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip old crap> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>>>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. >>>>> >>>>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded >>>>> and ignorant as ever. >>>> >>>> So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a >>>> pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot? >>> >>> >>> >>> Suns and planets are not equivalent to tires and pressure cookers, o >>> stupid, pigheaded and ignorant JimPee the Penisnino. >> >> Yes, and that was exactly the point, barking mad crackpot, i.e. gravity >> can cause pressure in some circumstances but gravity is an entirely >> different thing than pressure and has different units. > > One cannot know whether to laugh of cry by such absurdity. > > That's because you're talking to the dead.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-10 03:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <b835af1fa98e3d74b209ce62476059d0@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #891741 |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 2:28:16 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 3/9/25 4:21 PM, bertietaylor wrote: >> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 4:36:39 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 1:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snip old crap> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>>>>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded >>>>>> and ignorant as ever. >>>>> >>>>> So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a >>>>> pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Suns and planets are not equivalent to tires and pressure cookers, o >>>> stupid, pigheaded and ignorant JimPee the Penisnino. >>> >>> Yes, and that was exactly the point, barking mad crackpot, i.e. gravity >>> can cause pressure in some circumstances but gravity is an entirely >>> different thing than pressure and has different units. >> >> One cannot know whether to laugh of cry by such absurdity. Indeed such is the surpassingly distressing result of generations of foolish apes fed by the bullshit laws of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity and the bunkum of quantum. Their heads are fried with such astounding nonsenses. No decency, no morality and no intelligence too. Inevitable result of seeing wrong as right, and right as wrong. Sad. So they need AI badly, having no NI. With lack of proper romantic skills, they will have artificial robotic partners next, if they can so afford, as Elon Musk has foreseen and will hugely profit by. > > > That's because you're talking to the dead. Hush, Roachie. Bigots like the Penisnino here consider talking to the dead to be taboo. woof woof woof woof Bertitaylor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-08 21:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vqj1gd$188j1$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #891724 |
On 3/8/25 7:04 PM, bertietaylor wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> >> <snip old crap> >> >>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >> >> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. > > Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded > and ignorant as ever. > Lost cause! > It is Vulva vulvalizing by imitating "Jim Pennino" who died a few years back. He was 90 years old in 2016 (estimated by the choice of handgun he had). Are you assuming he is 99 years old now and still posting? That moron was super lucky to be 90 back then and alive, barely managing to place three words in his usenet post before retiring from it. He's farted out. It's that vulvat "Vulva" now assuming the dead man's role.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-31 02:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e353c3415592c1b06103db565ff86ae4@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #891727 |
On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 3:21:47 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 3/8/25 7:04 PM, bertietaylor wrote: >> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> <snip old crap> >>> >>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >>> >>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. >> >> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded >> and ignorant as ever. >> Lost cause! >> > > > It is Vulva vulvalizing by imitating "Jim Pennino" who died a few years > back. He was 90 years old in 2016 (estimated by the choice of handgun he > had). Are you assuming he is 99 years old now and still posting? That > moron was super lucky to be 90 back then and alive, barely managing to > place three words in his usenet post before retiring from it. > > He's farted out. > > It's that vulvat "Vulva" now assuming the dead man's role. As important to Sciencevas the wind that issues from the rears of rats. Woof woof --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-30 22:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vsd3f4$j9lt$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #892112 |
On 3/30/25 9:49 PM, Bertitaylor wrote: > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 3:21:47 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: > >> On 3/8/25 7:04 PM, bertietaylor wrote: >>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> <snip old crap> >>>> >>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >>>> >>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. >>> >>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded >>> and ignorant as ever. >>> Lost cause! >>> >> >> >> It is Vulva vulvalizing by imitating "Jim Pennino" who died a few years >> back. He was 90 years old in 2016 (estimated by the choice of handgun he >> had). Are you assuming he is 99 years old now and still posting? That >> moron was super lucky to be 90 back then and alive, barely managing to >> place three words in his usenet post before retiring from it. >> >> He's farted out. >> >> It's that vulvat "Vulva" now assuming the dead man's role. > > As important to Sciencevas the wind that issues from the rears of rats. > > Woof woof > > Sciencevas? Are you losing it too, like that Mitch something? Hey!... where's Mitch by the way! Is that one dead too? I wouldn't do one fart for that son of a bitch. But you?.. You know what your worth is to physics community. I will, not that long after you read this, fart a few hours getting you out of my system, and giving you back to Shiva in the most adequate way to respect your memory here in sci.physics. And that'll be one 1 lb bag of pinto beans less in my fridge. It will be a nice good day, that day. (don't forget to tell one of your 39 kids to post something here saying you're ready to be farted out)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-07 21:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <18c301d9078f0729ac4d6ae8cef5f276@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #892114 |
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 3:51:00 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 3/30/25 9:49 PM, Bertitaylor wrote: >> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 3:21:47 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: >> >>> On 3/8/25 7:04 PM, bertietaylor wrote: >>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <snip old crap> >>>>> >>>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net >>>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero. >>>>> >>>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot. >>>> >>>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded >>>> and ignorant as ever. >>>> Lost cause! >>>> >>> >>> >>> It is Vulva vulvalizing by imitating "Jim Pennino" who died a few years >>> back. He was 90 years old in 2016 (estimated by the choice of handgun he >>> had). Are you assuming he is 99 years old now and still posting? That >>> moron was super lucky to be 90 back then and alive, barely managing to >>> place three words in his usenet post before retiring from it. >>> >>> He's farted out. >>> >>> It's that vulvat "Vulva" now assuming the dead man's role. >> >> As important to Sciencevas the wind that issues from the rears of rats. >> >> Woof woof >> >> > > > Sciencevas? Are you losing it too, Replace v in Sciencevas with a blank and then you get Science as. like that Mitch something? Hey!... > where's Mitch by the way! Is that one dead too? > > I wouldn't do one fart for that son of a bitch. > > But you?.. You know what your worth is to physics community. I will, not > that long after you read this, fart a few hours getting you out of my > system, and giving you back to Shiva in the most adequate way to respect > your memory here in sci.physics. Tch tch, Roachie. Arindam has ground the entire corrupt physics community into the dust like so many toxic cigarette butts. Worry not, as but a scurrying roach you never belonged there. Remain safe under your stone until Trump squashes you. > > And that'll be one 1 lb bag of pinto beans less in my fridge. It will be > a nice good day, that day. Have it anyway in your little closet but don't light a match after. You are such fun. > > (don't forget to tell one of your 39 kids to post something here saying > you're ready to be farted out) Well that reminds me of Ali baba and his treasures which Arindam will get from the thieves. Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-08 05:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8fc474f3fa116b55337db3314b95e12e@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #891709 |
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 23:26:52 +0000, Ross Clark wrote: > On 8/03/2025 11:00 a.m., Bertietaylor wrote: >> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 21:14:03 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote: >> >>> ...forcibly lead, out of expulsion from any challenge, to totally wrong >>> and absolutely absurd understanding of the universe. >>> >>> What fools these apes be! >>> >>> Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof >>> >>> Bertietaylor >>> >>> -- >> >> The universe is eternal and infinite, filled with solid aether so fine >> that electrons glide through it with no resistance. The cores of stars >> are very cold, containing permanent currents creating large magnetic >> fields. Gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon. Stars lose their >> hydrogen cover which becomes nebulae. Then regain them after their dark >> cores reach nebulae, over trillion year cycles. >> >> -- > > Bow-wow-wow! Quiet, ape. Only Athel has the right to talk dog Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs) Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-07 16:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7ies9l-fmp6.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #891708 |
In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 21:14:03 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote: > >> ...forcibly lead, out of expulsion from any challenge, to totally wrong >> and absolutely absurd understanding of the universe. >> >> What fools these apes be! >> >> Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof >> >> Bertietaylor >> >> -- > > The universe is eternal and infinite, filled with solid aether so fine > that electrons glide through it with no resistance. The cores of stars > are very cold, containing permanent currents creating large magnetic > fields. Gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon. Stars lose their > hydrogen cover which becomes nebulae. Then regain them after their dark > cores reach nebulae, over trillion year cycles. > > -- Still batshit crazy I see, Arindam.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-27 22:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <f4d42d77aa3e6c2e39bf120865957a52@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #891710 |
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 0:11:21 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 21:14:03 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote: >> >>> ...forcibly lead, out of expulsion from any challenge, to totally wrong >>> and absolutely absurd understanding of the universe. >>> >>> What fools these apes be! >>> >>> Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof >>> >>> Bertietaylor >>> >>> -- >> >> The universe is eternal and infinite, filled with solid aether so fine >> that electrons glide through it with no resistance. The cores of stars >> are very cold, containing permanent currents creating large magnetic >> fields. Gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon. Stars lose their >> hydrogen cover which becomes nebulae. Then regain them after their dark >> cores reach nebulae, over trillion year cycles. >> >> -- > > Still batshit crazy I see, Arindam. Arindam sends his thanks, Penisnino. Being a penisnano, you will naturally find outstanding genius as batshit crazy. Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-27 17:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0j7hbl-2j49.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #892063 |
Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 0:11:21 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 21:14:03 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote: >>> >>>> ...forcibly lead, out of expulsion from any challenge, to totally wrong >>>> and absolutely absurd understanding of the universe. >>>> >>>> What fools these apes be! >>>> >>>> Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof >>>> >>>> Bertietaylor >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> The universe is eternal and infinite, filled with solid aether so fine >>> that electrons glide through it with no resistance. The cores of stars >>> are very cold, containing permanent currents creating large magnetic >>> fields. Gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon. Stars lose their >>> hydrogen cover which becomes nebulae. Then regain them after their dark >>> cores reach nebulae, over trillion year cycles. >>> >>> -- >> >> Still batshit crazy I see, Arindam. > > Arindam sends his thanks, For what, everyone alreay knows that you are delusionally insane, Arindam? <snip usual incoherent insanity>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-09 21:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vqldtk$1ae7r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #891708 |
On 3/7/25 17:00, Bertietaylor wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 21:14:03 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote: > >> ...forcibly lead, out of expulsion from any challenge, to totally wrong >> and absolutely absurd understanding of the universe. >> >> What fools these apes be! >> >> Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof >> >> Bertietaylor >> >> -- > > The universe is eternal and infinite, filled with solid aether so fine > that electrons glide through it with no resistance. The cores of stars > are very cold, containing permanent currents creating large magnetic > fields. Gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon. Stars lose their > hydrogen cover which becomes nebulae. Then regain them after their dark > cores reach nebulae, over trillion year cycles. The universe does not obey your religion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web