Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #877622 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 163 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 18:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 18:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 20:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 06:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 14:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 15:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 06:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 06:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 14:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 08:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 11:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 13:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-15 10:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 15:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 08:23 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 14:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 19:01 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 03:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2023-07-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 04:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 22:21 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 06:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-18 11:56 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 07:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-19 06:37 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 16:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 16:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 17:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 15:03 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 16:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-25 16:25 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 05:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 22:00 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:39 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-24 21:44 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 07:38 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-25 08:52 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 18:52 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 19:09 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 16:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 05:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 14:46 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 16:40 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 23:01 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:19 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 23:00 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 00:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 17:03 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 12:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-06 15:08 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 22:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 10:19 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-06 19:43 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 15:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 15:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 08:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 08:45 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 14:26 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 10:52 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 11:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 16:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 16:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 21:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-16 07:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 12:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:47 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:12 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:24 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 17:35 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 17:36 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 09:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 15:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 14:14 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 21:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:58 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:00 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 05:50 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 13:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 12:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 16:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 08:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 14:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:46 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 16:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 14:13 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 19:55 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 23:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 15:36 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 20:22 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-14 14:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <558c7d34-22dc-4284-b2b3-a127fdd2caabn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878945 |
On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > > On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > > > > > > > its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > > > > > > > > > > To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > > > > > > > > Really! > > > "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > > Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > > Greed and cowardice have done them in. > > E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > > Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." And unwilling to learn, naturally.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-14 15:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4fece5c0-f061-48bf-a208-56b3047f4996n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878969 |
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > > > On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > > > > > > > > > > > > To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > > > > > > > > > > Really! > > > > "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > > > Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > > > Greed and cowardice have done them in. > > > E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > > > Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > > "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > And unwilling to learn, naturally. "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-15 08:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <67e8a570-bf6a-4108-bb49-8a1108bce58an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878973 |
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > > On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > > > > On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > > > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > > > > > > > > > > > > Really! > > > > > "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > > > > Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > > > > Greed and cowardice have done them in. > > > > E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > > > > Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > > > "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > > And unwilling to learn, naturally. > "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-15 10:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kk1l9iFj134U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878994 |
On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Really! >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint > > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-15 11:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <677ae55f-ea1a-4d2e-87f7-95a5ab9758c2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878995 |
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 8:52:25 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Really! > >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. > >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. > >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint > > > > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) > Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant > men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These > "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. > > Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. "Is this what they call 'sockpuppetry'?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-15 15:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kk260qFlkqaU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #879005 |
On 8/15/2023 1:35 PM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 8:52:25 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Really! >>>>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. >>>>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. >>>>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. >>>>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. >>>>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. >>>>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." >>>>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. >>>> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint >>> >>> (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) >> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant >> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These >> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. >> >> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. > > "Is this what they call 'sockpuppetry'?" I don't know what you mean here as I see nothing applicable. Do you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-15 14:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6a992a59-417f-40d3-a08c-7f64b27f9435n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878995 |
On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Really! > >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. > >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. > >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint > > > > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) > Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant > men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These > "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. > > Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-15 14:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8q8tqj-7tn3.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #879014 |
Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Really! >> >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. >> >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. >> >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. >> >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. >> >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. >> >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." >> >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. >> >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint >> > >> > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) >> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant >> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These >> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. >> >> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. > Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion that railguns are not practical. Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-15 16:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b63bdefa-491d-4b4e-abd4-895da6c811a6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #879017 |
On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 08:01:12 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Really! > >> >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > >> >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > >> >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. > >> >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > >> >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > >> >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > >> >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. > >> >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint > >> > > >> > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) > >> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant > >> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These > >> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. > >> > >> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. > > Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. > The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion > that railguns are not practical. God bless the USNavy, and Lt. Schroder of the US Navy whose work on rail gun recoil was the basis for my failed PhD. Their design was based on conventional artillery. Mine is not. > > Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. Good idea. Think I owe them that. As things are, I am more interested in revising the basics of physics for better morality and technology. > > Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis... For which they only need to see my 2017 and 2022 videos available on youtube.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-15 16:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4hetqj-plt3.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #879020 |
Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 08:01:12 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >> >> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >> > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >> >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >> >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >> >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >> >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >> >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Really! >> >> >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. >> >> >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. >> >> >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. >> >> >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. >> >> >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. >> >> >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." >> >> >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. >> >> >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint >> >> > >> >> > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) >> >> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant >> >> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These >> >> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. >> >> >> >> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. >> > Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. >> The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion >> that railguns are not practical. > God bless the USNavy, and Lt. Schroder of the US Navy whose work on rail gun recoil was the basis for my failed PhD. > Their design was based on conventional artillery. Mine is not. >> >> Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. > Good idea. Think I owe them that. As things are, I am more interested in revising the basics of physics for better morality and technology. > >> >> Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis... > For which they only need to see my 2017 and 2022 videos available on youtube. Like I said, a WORKING railgun and a FULL analysis with data readings, graphs, equations, etc., NOT some half assed video with no analysis.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-15 21:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d64e1f34-7c50-4d86-8e45-362633cf8bden@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #879023 |
On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 09:46:09 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 08:01:12 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >> >> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> Really! > >> >> >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > >> >> >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > >> >> >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. > >> >> >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > >> >> >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > >> >> >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > >> >> >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. > >> >> >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint > >> >> > > >> >> > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) > >> >> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant > >> >> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These > >> >> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. > >> >> > >> >> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. > >> > Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. > >> The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion > >> that railguns are not practical. Heh-heh, given half that sum I would have made not only a rail gun firing heavy missiles that would reach hypersonic speeds, but a ship to the Moon with my internal force engines. But what to say, the whodumbos rule! > > God bless the USNavy, and Lt. Schroder of the US Navy whose work on rail gun recoil was the basis for my failed PhD. > > Their design was based on conventional artillery. Mine is not. > >> > >> Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. > > Good idea. Think I owe them that. As things are, I am more interested in revising the basics of physics for better morality and technology. > > > >> > >> Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis... > > For which they only need to see my 2017 and 2022 videos available on youtube. > Like I said, a WORKING railgun and a FULL analysis with data readings, > graphs, equations, etc., NOT some half assed video with no analysis. Those videos are not for fools. Understanding those videos calls for far superior intelligence, breadth of view, and knowledge than what I have found in Usenet. Very very few in the viewing public may meet that criteria. But I have no doubt that a brilliant person with some knowledge of calculas and electrical engineering will understand, if that person has an open mind. My scientific works presented in a new and original medium (incontrovertible video with explanations) are for trained and established professionals, successful in their own disciplines, for further development; not for those who call themselves physicists, among whom some may pretend to be engineers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-16 07:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <s13vqj-98s4.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #879024 |
Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 09:46:09 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 08:01:12 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >> >> >> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >> >> > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >> >> >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >> >> >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Really! >> >> >> >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. >> >> >> >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. >> >> >> >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. >> >> >> >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. >> >> >> >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. >> >> >> >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." >> >> >> >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. >> >> >> >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint >> >> >> > >> >> >> > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) >> >> >> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant >> >> >> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These >> >> >> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. >> >> >> >> >> >> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. >> >> > Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. >> >> The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion >> >> that railguns are not practical. > > Heh-heh, given half that sum I would have made not only a rail gun firing heavy missiles that would reach hypersonic speeds, but a ship to the Moon with my internal force engines. > But what to say, the whodumbos rule! > >> > God bless the USNavy, and Lt. Schroder of the US Navy whose work on rail gun recoil was the basis for my failed PhD. >> > Their design was based on conventional artillery. Mine is not. >> >> >> >> Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. >> > Good idea. Think I owe them that. As things are, I am more interested in revising the basics of physics for better morality and technology. >> > >> >> >> >> Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis... >> > For which they only need to see my 2017 and 2022 videos available on youtube. >> Like I said, a WORKING railgun and a FULL analysis with data readings, >> graphs, equations, etc., NOT some half assed video with no analysis. > > Those videos are not for fools. > Understanding those videos calls for far superior intelligence, breadth of view, and knowledge than what I have found in Usenet. > Very very few in the viewing public may meet that criteria. But I have no doubt that a brilliant person with some knowledge of calculas and electrical engineering will understand, if that person has an open mind. > My scientific works presented in a new and original medium (incontrovertible video with explanations) are for trained and established professionals, successful in their own disciplines, for further development; not for those who call themselves physicists, among whom some may pretend to be engineers. Your videos do not stand up to the demands of a 5th grade science report, much less what is required for real science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-16 12:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a16bfa29-212a-4132-b949-e1baa6d54c19n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #879042 |
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 7:31:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote: > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 09:46:09 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 08:01:12 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >> >> >> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >> > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >> >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >> >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Really! > >> >> >> >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > >> >> >> >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > >> >> >> >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. > >> >> >> >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > >> >> >> >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > >> >> >> >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > >> >> >> >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. > >> >> >> >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) > >> >> >> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant > >> >> >> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These > >> >> >> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. > >> >> > Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. > >> >> The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion > >> >> that railguns are not practical. > > > > Heh-heh, given half that sum I would have made not only a rail gun firing heavy missiles that would reach hypersonic speeds, but a ship to the Moon with my internal force engines. > > But what to say, the whodumbos rule! > > > >> > God bless the USNavy, and Lt. Schroder of the US Navy whose work on rail gun recoil was the basis for my failed PhD. > >> > Their design was based on conventional artillery. Mine is not. > >> >> > >> >> Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. > >> > Good idea. Think I owe them that. As things are, I am more interested in revising the basics of physics for better morality and technology. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis... > >> > For which they only need to see my 2017 and 2022 videos available on youtube. > >> Like I said, a WORKING railgun and a FULL analysis with data readings, > >> graphs, equations, etc., NOT some half assed video with no analysis. > > > > Those videos are not for fools. > > Understanding those videos calls for far superior intelligence, breadth of view, and knowledge than what I have found in Usenet. > > Very very few in the viewing public may meet that criteria. But I have no doubt that a brilliant person with some knowledge of calculas and electrical engineering will understand, if that person has an open mind. > > My scientific works presented in a new and original medium (incontrovertible video with explanations) are for trained and established professionals, successful in their own disciplines, for further development; not for those who call themselves physicists, among whom some may pretend to be engineers. > Your videos do not stand up to the demands of a 5th grade science > report, much less what is required for real science. "False agreement"? I don't remember what this is called.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-16 14:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0bba3076-79f1-4112-a2f9-c84907ea46ddn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #879047 |
On Thursday, 17 August 2023 at 05:16:50 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 7:31:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote: > > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 09:46:09 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 08:01:12 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > > >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > On Wednesdays accepted by law courts., 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > >> >> >> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > >> >> >> > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > >> >> >> >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >> >> >> >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > >> >> >> >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >> >> >> >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Really! > > >> >> >> >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > > >> >> >> >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > > >> >> >> >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. > > >> >> >> >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > > >> >> >> >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > > >> >> >> >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > > >> >> >> >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. > > >> >> >> >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) > > >> >> >> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant > > >> >> >> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These > > >> >> >> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. > > >> >> > Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. > > >> >> The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion > > >> >> that railguns are not practical. > > > > > > Heh-heh, given half that sum I would have made not only a rail gun firing heavy missiles that would reach hypersonic speeds, but a ship to the Moon with my internal force engines. > > > But what to say, the whodumbos rule! > > > > > >> > God bless the USNavy, and Lt. Schroder of the US Navy whose work on rail gun recoil was the basis for my failed PhD. > > >> > Their design was based on conventional artillery. Mine is not. > > >> >> > > >> >> Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. > > >> > Good idea. Think I owe them that. As things are, I am more interested in revising the basics of physics for better morality and technology. > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis... > > >> > For which they only need to see my 2017 and 2022 videos available on youtube. > > >> Like I said, a WORKING railgun and a FULL analysis with data readings, > > >> graphs, equations, etc., NOT some half assed video with no analysis. > > > > > > Those videos are not for fools. > > > Understanding those videos calls for far superior intelligence, breadth of view, and knowledge than what I have found in Usenet. > > > Very very few in the viewing public may meet that criteria. But I have no doubt that a brilliant person with some knowledge of calculas and electrical engineering will understand, if that person has an open mind. > > > My scientific works presented in a new and original medium (incontrovertible video with explanations) are for trained and established professionals, successful in their own disciplines, for further development; not for those who call themselves physicists, among whom some may pretend to be engineers. > > Your videos do not stand up to the demands of a 5th grade science > > report, much less what is required for real science. > "False agreement"? I don't remember what this is called. False people say false things. That works for the headless and thus brainless sorts. Video evidence is accepted by law courts. Final.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-16 14:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3dca1ab4-ab9c-49a1-8798-c38f95047671n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #879042 |
On Thursday, 17 August 2023 at 00:31:10 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 09:46:09 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 08:01:12 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >> >> >> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >> > On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >> >>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >> >>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Really! > >> >> >> >>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > >> >> >> >>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > >> >> >> >>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. > >> >> >> >>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > >> >> >> >>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > >> >> >> >>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > >> >> >> >>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. > >> >> >> >> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) > >> >> >> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant > >> >> >> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These > >> >> >> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. > >> >> > Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. > >> >> The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion > >> >> that railguns are not practical. > > > > Heh-heh, given half that sum I would have made not only a rail gun firing heavy missiles that would reach hypersonic speeds, but a ship to the Moon with my internal force engines. > > But what to say, the whodumbos rule! > > > >> > God bless the USNavy, and Lt. Schroder of the US Navy whose work on rail gun recoil was the basis for my failed PhD. > >> > Their design was based on conventional artillery. Mine is not. > >> >> > >> >> Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. > >> > Good idea. Think I owe them that. As things are, I am more interested in revising the basics of physics for better morality and technology. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis... > >> > For which they only need to see my 2017 and 2022 videos available on youtube. > >> Like I said, a WORKING railgun and a FULL analysis with data readings, > >> graphs, equations, etc., NOT some half assed video with no analysis. > > > > Those videos are not for fools. > > Understanding those videos calls for far superior intelligence, breadth of view, and knowledge than what I have found in Usenet. > > Very very few in the viewing public may meet that criteria. But I have no doubt that a brilliant person with some knowledge of calculas and electrical engineering will understand, if that person has an open mind. > > My scientific works presented in a new and original medium (incontrovertible video with explanations) are for trained and established professionals, successful in their own disciplines, for further development; not for those who call themselves physicists, among whom some may pretend to be engineers. > Your videos do not stand up to the demands of a 5th grade science > report, much less what is required for real science. You have less clue of science than any middle school student should have. So, you are just noise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-17 19:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ubmbhs$3uu02$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #879042 |
On 8/16/2023 10:28 AM, Jim Pennino wrote: > Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 09:46:09 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 08:01:12 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really! >>>>>>>>>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. >>>>>>>>>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. >>>>>>>>>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. >>>>>>>>>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. >>>>>>>>>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. >>>>>>>>>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." >>>>>>>>>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. >>>>>>>>> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) >>>>>>> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant >>>>>>> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These >>>>>>> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. >>>>>> Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. >>>>> The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion >>>>> that railguns are not practical. >> >> Heh-heh, given half that sum I would have made not only a rail gun firing heavy missiles that would reach hypersonic speeds, but a ship to the Moon with my internal force engines. >> But what to say, the whodumbos rule! >> >>>> God bless the USNavy, and Lt. Schroder of the US Navy whose work on rail gun recoil was the basis for my failed PhD. >>>> Their design was based on conventional artillery. Mine is not. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. >>>> Good idea. Think I owe them that. As things are, I am more interested in revising the basics of physics for better morality and technology. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis... >>>> For which they only need to see my 2017 and 2022 videos available on youtube. >>> Like I said, a WORKING railgun and a FULL analysis with data readings, >>> graphs, equations, etc., NOT some half assed video with no analysis. >> >> Those videos are not for fools. >> Understanding those videos calls for far superior intelligence, breadth of view, and knowledge than what I have found in Usenet. >> Very very few in the viewing public may meet that criteria. But I have no doubt that a brilliant person with some knowledge of calculas and electrical engineering will understand, if that person has an open mind. >> My scientific works presented in a new and original medium (incontrovertible video with explanations) are for trained and established professionals, successful in their own disciplines, for further development; not for those who call themselves physicists, among whom some may pretend to be engineers. > > Your videos do not stand up to the demands of a 5th grade science > report, much less what is required for real science. Video (or any other) evidence in a court is not introduced in a vacuum. It is an item of evidence and a witness (often the maker of a video or an expert witness) is called to testify what the video shows under examination, and a cross examining lawyer can counter what the witness describes. (I was an alternate juror for a trial including video evidence just recently) In my opinion, if Banjo's videos were introduced in a trial, a good cross examining attorney would rip them to shreds, due to all the lack of measurements and Banjo just trying to tell the viewer what he wants them to believe, not believe the video itself being too vague. Of course I tried to tell Banjo about this, all he did was to attack me, just like his twin Plutonium does. (at least Banjo makes a feeble attempt at evidence of his claims, Pluto just says it's true just because he said so).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-17 18:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b39c6390-4da3-468c-b787-49d6bfe7d357n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #879093 |
On Friday, 18 August 2023 at 09:49:13 UTC+10, Volney wrote: > On 8/16/2023 10:28 AM, Jim Pennino wrote: > > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 09:46:09 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > >>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 08:01:12 UTC+10, Jim Pennino wrote: > >>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 01:52:25 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>>>>>> On 8/15/2023 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:19:45 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 2:26:48 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 01:45:10 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really! > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Greed and cowardice have done them in. > >>>>>>>>>>>> E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. > >>>>>>>>>>> "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself." > >>>>>>>>>> And unwilling to learn, naturally. > >>>>>>>>> "I'm not looking to get hired, here." #hinthint > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> (Tired claptrap, mountains and mountains of it.) > >>>>>>> Arindam gets wound up very easily. Recently he was an assistant > >>>>>>> men's room attendant. In those days it was all shit talk. These > >>>>>>> "mountains of claptrap" represent a wonderful advance on his part. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Perhaps soon he will calm down into rationality. > >>>>>> Alas, that sort of whodumbic "rationality", that is, incredible mendacity for suppression purposes,will not explain why the rail gun of my new design, with low voltage and heavy armature, works. > >>>>> The US Navy spent 15 years and $500,000,000 and came to the conclusion > >>>>> that railguns are not practical. > >> > >> Heh-heh, given half that sum I would have made not only a rail gun firing heavy missiles that would reach hypersonic speeds, but a ship to the Moon with my internal force engines. > >> But what to say, the whodumbos rule! > >> > >>>> God bless the USNavy, and Lt. Schroder of the US Navy whose work on rail gun recoil was the basis for my failed PhD. > >>>> Their design was based on conventional artillery. Mine is not. > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe you should send them a proposal for your wonderous invention. > >>>> Good idea. Think I owe them that. As things are, I am more interested in revising the basics of physics for better morality and technology. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Of course, they will want to see a working railgun and a full analysis... > >>>> For which they only need to see my 2017 and 2022 videos available on youtube. > >>> Like I said, a WORKING railgun and a FULL analysis with data readings, > >>> graphs, equations, etc., NOT some half assed video with no analysis. > >> > >> Those videos are not for fools. > >> Understanding those videos calls for far superior intelligence, breadth of view, and knowledge than what I have found in Usenet. > >> Very very few in the viewing public may meet that criteria. But I have no doubt that a brilliant person with some knowledge of calculas and electrical engineering will understand, if that person has an open mind. > >> My scientific works presented in a new and original medium (incontrovertible video with explanations) are for trained and established professionals, successful in their own disciplines, for further development; not for those who call themselves physicists, among whom some may pretend to be engineers. > > > > Your videos do not stand up to the demands of a 5th grade science > > report, much less what is required for real science. > Video (or any other) evidence in a court is not introduced in a vacuum. > It is an item of evidence and a witness (often the maker of a video or > an expert witness) is called to testify what the video shows under > examination, and a cross examining lawyer can counter what the witness > describes. Good ideas. Let them who are interested all come to my company (well, there is only one person there, but he is worth at least $500000000) to check out the original experiments to confirm the videos. They will, of course, have to undergo the proper secuity procedures of my company. LIke, name, address, affiliation, date, proper video inspection of them, etc. All nice and written down. Photographed. Videos will be there, all around. Press also most cordially invited. And more legal stuff too, as advised by possible legal and business partners. (Who know, how I have inclined the floor of my shed and garage to make the armature roll down by gravity!!! - attention, whodumbo Or how I manage to accelerate a 7 Kg mass with speed down the rails with my sole finger!!!! - attention, Moroney) Till then, quod videosi, videosi. The videos have been up from 2017, free and open to the whole world to comment upon. A respectful (or surly) silence is what I get, for the most part. Of late there has been one encouraging comment. - moronic opinions, causing side-splitting laughter, from the moron Moroney snipped - Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 05:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ubq59a$9fo4$4@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #879097 |
On 8/17/2023 8:12 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > - moronic opinions, causing side-splitting laughter, from the moron Moroney snipped - Vulva still active in sci.physics? God what an ass-kisser one can be to behave differently in different newsgroups :( Yucks. Seen them everywhere, Iran and USA. Type 4 autistic, petty criminals. You Arindam at least fall into major criminals category! You preserve your mettle regardless of where you may be. The Vulva type is perennially in need of more than one alias. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 05:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ff1cb140-a82b-484c-a47d-03dcf0068986n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #879198 |
On Saturday, 19 August 2023 at 20:24:47 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 8/17/2023 8:12 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > - moronic opinions, causing side-splitting laughter, from the moron Moroney snipped - > Vulva still active in sci.physics? God what an ass-kisser one can be to > behave differently in different newsgroups :( Yucks. Looks like he paid you nothing in your crowd funding effort to bump me off, Roachie. Explains your petty petulance. > > Seen them everywhere, Iran and USA. Type 4 autistic, petty criminals. > You Arindam at least fall into major criminals category! Forty lashes for you, Roachie. You preserve > your mettle regardless of where you may be. > > The Vulva type is perennially in need of more than one alias. > > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 07:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ubqc46$9jjd$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #879204 |
On 8/19/2023 7:10 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> Seen them everywhere, Iran and USA. Type 4 autistic, petty criminals. >> You Arindam at least fall into major criminals category! > Forty lashes for you, Roachie. Hahahhaahah :-))) -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web