Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #877622 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 163 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 18:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 18:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 20:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 06:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 14:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 15:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 06:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 06:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 14:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 08:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 11:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 13:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-15 10:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 15:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 08:23 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 14:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 19:01 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 03:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2023-07-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 04:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 22:21 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 06:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-18 11:56 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 07:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-19 06:37 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 16:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 16:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 17:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 15:03 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 16:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-25 16:25 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 05:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 22:00 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:39 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-24 21:44 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 07:38 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-25 08:52 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 18:52 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 19:09 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 16:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 05:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 14:46 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 16:40 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 23:01 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:19 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 23:00 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 00:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 17:03 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 12:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-06 15:08 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 22:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 10:19 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-06 19:43 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 15:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 15:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 08:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 08:45 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 14:26 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 10:52 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 11:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 16:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 16:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 21:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-16 07:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 12:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:47 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:12 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:24 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 17:35 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 17:36 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 09:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 15:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 14:14 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 21:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:58 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:00 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 05:50 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 13:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 12:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 16:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 08:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 14:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:46 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 16:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 14:13 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 19:55 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 23:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 15:36 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 20:22 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 12:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <909ba5a4-eb28-4fde-b8c9-6e437c78a562n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878321 |
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 12:21:31 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 7/29/2023 10:35 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:32:51 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 11:19:05 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>> On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>> > >>>>> He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > >>>>> time. > >>> > >>>> Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > >>> Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks > >> I have no wish to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. Having stupid whodumbos for devotees - ugh, what a thought! > >>> by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? > >> I have done that many a time. Lazy robot, go find out the links. > >>> This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! > >> Following my 2022 video films, constipational crises has overtaken their laughter. > >> How is the armature getting accelerated along the rails? As there is still some honesty left in the newbies, they will not accept the whodat-Moroney theory that the table/floor is inclined so that it moves by gravity and also by my single finger. > >> Well then, what is happening???? > >> Is the armature getting accelerated by magic? > >> Are quarks, bosons, strings, photons, gravitons, dark matter, black holes, etc. involved in this??? > >> The Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks are dumb about this!!!!! > >> Rotating-head pea-soup emitting robots like Alsing cannot understand that. > >> > >> Beyond its programming, so the robot Alsing will resort to its exception handling pea-soup emitting routine, produced below: > >>> I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! > >> Actually the late Bertram Wilberforce Wooster (Bertie) knew more genuine physics than the Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks. > >> Bertie was such a friend, companion and encourager in the early days of my discovery of the formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) and efforts of its development by literary and engineering means. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Arindam Banerjee > > > > "Do you know what? It strikes me as though that Indian on Twitter Vivek Ramaswamy has been doing something like an imitation of the dictator in Jeeves and Wooster..." #probablyacommonthought > Actually when you get right down to it this Indian is not that smart. Space ships are always subject to acceleration deceleration in space giving them weight.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 12:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2eripj-p6db.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #878323 |
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote: <snip> > Space ships are always subject to acceleration deceleration in space giving them weight. > And other than the engine, what would cause that moron?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 14:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <89e889de-8c0b-43c6-8036-d2d04e87df24n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878321 |
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 12:21:31 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 7/29/2023 10:35 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:32:51 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 11:19:05 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>> On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>> > >>>>> He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > >>>>> time. > >>> > >>>> Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > >>> Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks > >> I have no wish to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. Having stupid whodumbos for devotees - ugh, what a thought! > >>> by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? > >> I have done that many a time. Lazy robot, go find out the links. > >>> This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! > >> Following my 2022 video films, constipational crises has overtaken their laughter. > >> How is the armature getting accelerated along the rails? As there is still some honesty left in the newbies, they will not accept the whodat-Moroney theory that the table/floor is inclined so that it moves by gravity and also by my single finger. > >> Well then, what is happening???? > >> Is the armature getting accelerated by magic? > >> Are quarks, bosons, strings, photons, gravitons, dark matter, black holes, etc. involved in this??? > >> The Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks are dumb about this!!!!! > >> Rotating-head pea-soup emitting robots like Alsing cannot understand that. > >> > >> Beyond its programming, so the robot Alsing will resort to its exception handling pea-soup emitting routine, produced below: > >>> I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! > >> Actually the late Bertram Wilberforce Wooster (Bertie) knew more genuine physics than the Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks. > >> Bertie was such a friend, companion and encourager in the early days of my discovery of the formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) and efforts of its development by literary and engineering means. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Arindam Banerjee > > > > "Do you know what? It strikes me as though that Indian on Twitter Vivek Ramaswamy has been doing something like an imitation of the dictator in Jeeves and Wooster..." #probablyacommonthought > Actually when you get right down to it this Indian is not that smart. "I think it's just him personally."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 15:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0a9239e4-37d9-4485-9486-3c1edb1d1b13n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878044 |
On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 00:52:37 UTC+8, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said: > > > On 25-July-23 12:38 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > >> > >> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > > > > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > > someone else to solve. > > > >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. > > > > > > > > > >> My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. > >> On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. > > > > > >>> > >>> What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? > >> > >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces > >> where the engine will be kept.) > > > > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction between > > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think that the > > mercury won't become involved in that? > > > >> > >> Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. > Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a > matter between you and the Australian patent office. Sylvia can do what she pleases. I do not think she is honest, just like the rest of you Eurocentrics here who protect your basic insanities with dishonesties. My postings are for the whole world to see and understand, not just an entitled bunch of racist bigots marinated in hypocrisy. Those honest and rich may contact me if genuinely interested. Others, keep out. I am going for industrial secrecy, not patenting, as the strategy for my research company. I tried patenting before, did not work, was a waste of good money I cannot afford. > > > >> > >> Unless I lead a team with access to mercury I can only predict. > >>> > > > > Sylvia. > -- > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots Just a bow-wow chappie, as useless as they come.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1ca858cf-49cb-44d3-bc0a-53214229134cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878066 |
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:51:22 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 00:52:37 UTC+8, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said: > > > > > On 25-July-23 12:38 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > >>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > > >> > > >> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > > > > > > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > > > someone else to solve. > > > > > >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. > > >> On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? > > >> > > >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces > > >> where the engine will be kept.) > > > > > > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction between > > > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think that the > > > mercury won't become involved in that? > > > > > >> > > >> Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. > > Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a > > matter between you and the Australian patent office. > Sylvia can do what she pleases. > I do not think she is honest, just like the rest of you Eurocentrics here who protect your basic insanities with dishonesties. > My postings are for the whole world to see and understand, not just an entitled bunch of racist bigots marinated in hypocrisy. Those honest and rich may contact me if genuinely interested. Others, keep out. > I am going for industrial secrecy, not patenting, as the strategy for my research company. I tried patenting before, did not work, was a waste of good money I cannot afford. > > > > > >> > > >> Unless I lead a team with access to mercury I can only predict. > > >>> > > > > > > Sylvia. > > -- > > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots > Just a bow-wow chappie, as useless as they come. "Are you talking about yourself?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 14:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8fb681bd-95d3-476e-9e83-56fa746dcfcbn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877622 |
On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 07:37:29 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > > https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > > > Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > Then, again and again, with the hits. > Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee Just as a gun, working perfectly, at last, going down smoothly down the rails, after many failed efforts, thanks to the blessing of my dear Mother-Goddess Kali. This was done last year, and posted in my facebook timeline. Link below. https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/592548412412428 Note my explanations in the text for this above post. "First testing of the latest rail gun with the heavy 7.163 Kg bullet that is heavier than the gun. It runs on 8.2 volts. If it ran at 1000 V it would send the bullet which could be a missile to hypersonic speeds. It would make existing artillery look like muskets! Unfortunately the history of mankind indicates that leaders would spend money on this far more readily than my math methods for solving complex problems, the HTN details at htnresearch.com and reactionless motors for space conquest. At least I can show how quintillion dollar works started over the coming millennia, from this my garage!" It will take a lot of imagination and effort turn this into a reactionless motor, but as a gun its potential is obvious for war and peace. !!!!!!!! Oy whodumbo, what is the slope of my garage floor??? :-) !!!!!!!! Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 23:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <249aa5cd-5ef0-4af6-a4ae-a8a5994a8816n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878344 |
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 07:55:35 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 07:37:29 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > > > https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > > > > > Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > > shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > > (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > > The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > > In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > > In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > > Then, again and again, with the hits. > > Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > Just as a gun, working perfectly, at last, going down smoothly down the rails, after many failed efforts, thanks to the blessing of my dear Mother-Goddess Kali. > This was done last year, and posted in my facebook timeline. Link below. > > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/592548412412428 > > Note my explanations in the text for this above post. > "First testing of the latest rail gun with the heavy 7.163 Kg bullet that is heavier than the gun. It runs on 8.2 volts. If it ran at 1000 V it would send the bullet which could be a missile to hypersonic speeds. It would make existing artillery look like muskets! Unfortunately the history of mankind indicates that leaders would spend money on this far more readily than my math methods for solving complex problems, the HTN details at htnresearch.com and reactionless motors for space conquest. > At least I can show how quintillion dollar works started over the coming millennia, from this my garage!" > > It will take a lot of imagination and effort turn this into a reactionless motor, but as a gun its potential is obvious for war and peace. > > !!!!!!!! > Oy whodumbo, what is the slope of my garage floor??? :-) > !!!!!!!! Heh-heh. > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee rotflw4pita
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-06 15:08 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <kj8o6pFh57nU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878344 |
On 31-July-23 7:55 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > Note my explanations in the text for this above post. "First testing > of the latest rail gun with the heavy 7.163 Kg bullet that is heavier > than the gun. It runs on 8.2 volts. If it ran at 1000 V it would send > the bullet which could be a missile to hypersonic speeds. The video shows more or less constant velocity after a short period of acceleration. But even if the the acceleration were maintained, the current goes up with the voltage, and so does the acceleration. But the resulting velocity only goes up with the square root of the acceleration, and consequently only with the square root of the voltage. I'm rather doubtful of your hypersonic claim. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-05 22:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4013ce01-8e55-4b30-a034-3ea94e8a0819n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878568 |
On Sunday, 6 August 2023 at 15:08:47 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 31-July-23 7:55 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > > Note my explanations in the text for this above post. "First testing > > of the latest rail gun with the heavy 7.163 Kg bullet that is heavier > > than the gun. It runs on 8.2 volts. If it ran at 1000 V it would send > > the bullet which could be a missile to hypersonic speeds. > The video shows more or less constant velocity after a short period of > acceleration. But even if the the acceleration were maintained, the > current goes up with the voltage, and so does the acceleration. But the > resulting velocity only goes up with the square root of the > acceleration, and consequently only with the square root of the voltage. Wow, this beats Archiebabble for sure. > > I'm rather doubtful of your hypersonic claim. > > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-07 10:19 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <kjarkoFrqfjU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878570 |
On 06-Aug-23 3:59 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Sunday, 6 August 2023 at 15:08:47 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 31-July-23 7:55 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >>> >>> Note my explanations in the text for this above post. "First testing >>> of the latest rail gun with the heavy 7.163 Kg bullet that is heavier >>> than the gun. It runs on 8.2 volts. If it ran at 1000 V it would send >>> the bullet which could be a missile to hypersonic speeds. >> The video shows more or less constant velocity after a short period of >> acceleration. But even if the the acceleration were maintained, the >> current goes up with the voltage, and so does the acceleration. But the >> resulting velocity only goes up with the square root of the >> acceleration, and consequently only with the square root of the voltage. > > Wow, this beats Archiebabble for sure. > >> >> I'm rather doubtful of your hypersonic claim. >> >> Sylvia. I take it you don't understand the elementary physics involved. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-06 19:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kjat10FrnerU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878601 |
On 8/6/2023 7:19 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 06-Aug-23 3:59 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Sunday, 6 August 2023 at 15:08:47 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>> On 31-July-23 7:55 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Note my explanations in the text for this above post. "First testing >>>> of the latest rail gun with the heavy 7.163 Kg bullet that is heavier >>>> than the gun. It runs on 8.2 volts. If it ran at 1000 V it would send >>>> the bullet which could be a missile to hypersonic speeds. >>> The video shows more or less constant velocity after a short period of >>> acceleration. But even if the the acceleration were maintained, the >>> current goes up with the voltage, and so does the acceleration. But the >>> resulting velocity only goes up with the square root of the >>> acceleration, and consequently only with the square root of the voltage. >> >> Wow, this beats Archiebabble for sure. >> >>> >>> I'm rather doubtful of your hypersonic claim. >>> >>> Sylvia. > > I take it you don't understand the elementary physics involved. > > Sylvia. I don't know if you've followed Banerjee's posts over a longer period of time, but a while back he admitted that he skipped a lot of classes and even paid others to take exams for him, so his actual exposure to the subject matter he propounds is often just guesswork on his part. But bear in mind that he reverts to having received the blessings of the appropriate (according to his religion) gods and goddesses where it comes to his alleged knowledge. That seems to work quite well with his Indian and Pakistani Facebook friends, his fall back criteria supporting his arrogance where it comes to his being a self-proclaimed expert in any field he deems of interest to him. Early in our discussions he acknowledged he had been diagnosed a narcissist. So long as he has his religious underpinnings and his "Facebook" experts supporting him the only discussions available will forever remain devoid of reasonability and logic under any western standards. I withdrew from discussions with him for such reasons. I harbor no animosity towards him while I generally avoid commenting. I applaud your attempts to reason with him but have no faith that they will accomplish anything.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-06 18:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57e5d48b-ff13-4a86-807f-0e054b498d6bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878603 |
On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 10:43:18 UTC+10, whodat wrote: (after consuming lots of laxatives supplied by Archie) > I don't know if you've followed Banerjee's posts over a longer > period of time, but a while back he admitted that he skipped > a lot of classes and even paid others to take exams for him, I did skip some classes in IIT Kgp and IIT Delhi because I had to, but whodumbo is lying (what is new) when he writes that I paid others to take exams for me. As a liar, whodumbo is perfectly reliable, and in his way, quite funny. Makes me laugh. Best lie was about the slope of my garage shed. It had to be sloped, in order for the armature to roll down by gravity! !!! The moron Moroney, being just a moron and not such a liar, has his halwa tight on this, not even suggesting that I pushed the armature with one finger of mine. rotflw4pita I got a First Class Honours degree for my B.Tech. in Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering from IIT Kharagpur in 1978, never failed a single subject. As I was elected the top student representative (Vice President of the Gymkhana) in 1977, I had extra responsibilities, so sometimes had to skip classes. I got M.Tech in Computer Science from the Mathematics Department of IIT Delhi in 1986, studying part time while working full time. As I was working full-time, I could not attend all the classes. Quite normal. For my thesis, I worked on a totally new area, "Information Systems based on Partial-Match Retrievals" which anticipated googling. My paper "A new method for partial match retrievals" was published in 1987 in US, my company paid for me to go there, and so all the wonders that followed. In this, and in many other areas. Anyway, my degrees have nothing to do with my inventions and discoveries relating to Internal Force Engines. My work experience in the top industrial research facilities in India and Australia mean much more. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-08 15:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fb1aba57-2372-4d11-aa7e-aaafe0b64dc5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878606 |
On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 11:17:51 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 10:43:18 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > (after consuming lots of laxatives supplied by Archie) > > I don't know if you've followed Banerjee's posts over a longer > > period of time, but a while back he admitted that he skipped > > a lot of classes and even paid others to take exams for him, > I did skip some classes in IIT Kgp and IIT Delhi because I had to, but whodumbo is lying (what is new) when he writes that I paid others to take exams for me. As a liar, whodumbo is perfectly reliable, and in his way, quite funny. Makes me laugh. > > Best lie was about the slope of my garage shed. It had to be sloped, in order for the armature to roll down by gravity! !!! The moron Moroney, being just a moron and not such a liar, has his halwa tight on this, not even suggesting that I pushed the armature with one finger of mine. > > rotflw4pita > > I got a First Class Honours degree for my B.Tech. in Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering from IIT Kharagpur in 1978, never failed a single subject. > As I was elected the top student representative (Vice President of the Gymkhana) in 1977, I had extra responsibilities, so sometimes had to skip classes. > I got M.Tech in Computer Science from the Mathematics Department of IIT Delhi in 1986, studying part time while working full time. As I was working full-time, I could not attend all the classes. Quite normal. For my thesis, I worked on a totally new area, "Information Systems based on Partial-Match Retrievals" which anticipated googling. My paper "A new method for partial match retrievals" was published in 1987 in US, my company paid for me to go there, and so all the wonders that followed. In this, and in many other areas. > > Anyway, my degrees have nothing to do with my inventions and discoveries relating to Internal Force Engines. My work experience in the top industrial research facilities in India and Australia mean much more. More importantly, they have given me a small measure of financial independence allowing me to indulge my hobbies, such as revising the basics of physics. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-10 08:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2190ca39-02c2-442f-a035-d4d6bc9a1e9dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878713 |
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 3:41:32 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 11:17:51 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 10:43:18 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > (after consuming lots of laxatives supplied by Archie) > > > I don't know if you've followed Banerjee's posts over a longer > > > period of time, but a while back he admitted that he skipped > > > a lot of classes and even paid others to take exams for him, > > I did skip some classes in IIT Kgp and IIT Delhi because I had to, but whodumbo is lying (what is new) when he writes that I paid others to take exams for me. As a liar, whodumbo is perfectly reliable, and in his way, quite funny. Makes me laugh. > > > > Best lie was about the slope of my garage shed. It had to be sloped, in order for the armature to roll down by gravity! !!! The moron Moroney, being just a moron and not such a liar, has his halwa tight on this, not even suggesting that I pushed the armature with one finger of mine. > > > > rotflw4pita > > > > I got a First Class Honours degree for my B.Tech. in Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering from IIT Kharagpur in 1978, never failed a single subject. > > As I was elected the top student representative (Vice President of the Gymkhana) in 1977, I had extra responsibilities, so sometimes had to skip classes. > > I got M.Tech in Computer Science from the Mathematics Department of IIT Delhi in 1986, studying part time while working full time. As I was working full-time, I could not attend all the classes. Quite normal. For my thesis, I worked on a totally new area, "Information Systems based on Partial-Match Retrievals" which anticipated googling. My paper "A new method for partial match retrievals" was published in 1987 in US, my company paid for me to go there, and so all the wonders that followed. In this, and in many other areas. > > > > Anyway, my degrees have nothing to do with my inventions and discoveries relating to Internal Force Engines. My work experience in the top industrial research facilities in India and Australia mean much more. > More importantly, they have given me a small measure of financial independence allowing me to indulge my hobbies, such as revising the basics of physics. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee Wider World: "Yeah, you never say that slur word. This guy is an f'in piece of work for sure, though."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-10 15:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kjkv7oFgr5oU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878764 |
On 8/10/2023 10:35 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 3:41:32 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 11:17:51 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 10:43:18 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>> >>> (after consuming lots of laxatives supplied by Archie) >>>> I don't know if you've followed Banerjee's posts over a longer >>>> period of time, but a while back he admitted that he skipped >>>> a lot of classes and even paid others to take exams for him, >>> I did skip some classes in IIT Kgp and IIT Delhi because I had to, but whodumbo is lying (what is new) when he writes that I paid others to take exams for me. As a liar, whodumbo is perfectly reliable, and in his way, quite funny. Makes me laugh. >>> >>> Best lie was about the slope of my garage shed. It had to be sloped, in order for the armature to roll down by gravity! !!! The moron Moroney, being just a moron and not such a liar, has his halwa tight on this, not even suggesting that I pushed the armature with one finger of mine. >>> >>> rotflw4pita >>> >>> I got a First Class Honours degree for my B.Tech. in Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering from IIT Kharagpur in 1978, never failed a single subject. >>> As I was elected the top student representative (Vice President of the Gymkhana) in 1977, I had extra responsibilities, so sometimes had to skip classes. >>> I got M.Tech in Computer Science from the Mathematics Department of IIT Delhi in 1986, studying part time while working full time. As I was working full-time, I could not attend all the classes. Quite normal. For my thesis, I worked on a totally new area, "Information Systems based on Partial-Match Retrievals" which anticipated googling. My paper "A new method for partial match retrievals" was published in 1987 in US, my company paid for me to go there, and so all the wonders that followed. In this, and in many other areas. >>> >>> Anyway, my degrees have nothing to do with my inventions and discoveries relating to Internal Force Engines. My work experience in the top industrial research facilities in India and Australia mean much more. >> More importantly, they have given me a small measure of financial independence allowing me to indulge my hobbies, such as revising the basics of physics. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Arindam Banerjee > > Wider World: "Yeah, you never say that slur word. This guy is an f'in piece of work for sure, though." I appreciate the sentiment but frankly I wouldn't give Banerjee even that little bit of credit. He alters his stories to suit the occasion as he understands the world through a jumbled brain. But my main point in this posting isn't so much to criticize him as it is to direct his, and all the other local cranks, attention to a TV special available on you tube. Since the cranks have a propensity to direct attention to their favorite "idol" of the moment I thought I would return the favor as they seem to find popular media presentations more informative than peer reviewed journals and/or textbooks on subjects they claim to know better than their teachers. Arindam try this you tube presentation on for size. It addresses a number of your contentions in language even you are capable of understanding. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dROkWymbkdo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-10 23:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c1786c63-eaef-471a-a515-49087748547an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878776 |
On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-12 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c7d4e904-f823-41d2-838d-9bb878fe9789n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878793 |
On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > > To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. Really!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-13 08:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <133ea072-c3e4-45ef-bffd-27b0776d645fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878879 |
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > > > > To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > > Really! "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-13 14:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b0e08a39-55d3-4396-8548-1f4823b4db2dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878906 |
On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > > > its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > > > > > > To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > > > > Really! > "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. Greed and cowardice have done them in. E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-14 08:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f5669b3b-63ff-44fd-9b8d-6f6519277da7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878925 |
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 2:57:25 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 01:48:01 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 3:57:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 16:55:42 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Friday, 11 August 2023 at 06:22:24 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > > > > > its usual rubbish, avoiding the key question, how much is the floor of my garage or shed sloped to let the armature roll down the rails with the force of gravity... > > > > > > > > To think that such whodat-class creeps rule the world, makes the flesh crawl. > > > > > > Really! > > "The land of MIT", oh my goodness, not at all the parvenu, very good, very good. > Like Mohicans now. Gone with the wind. > Greed and cowardice have done them in. > E=mcc=hv rules! There, and everywhere. Sad. > Else they would have invited me to give lecture-demos of my rail gun experiments. "You don't really know any science, do you? I don't know much, myself."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web