Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #877622 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 163 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 18:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 18:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 20:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 06:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 14:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 15:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 06:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 06:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 14:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 08:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 11:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 13:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-15 10:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 15:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 08:23 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 14:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 19:01 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 03:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2023-07-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 04:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 22:21 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 06:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-18 11:56 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 07:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-19 06:37 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 16:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 16:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 17:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 15:03 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 16:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-25 16:25 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 05:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 22:00 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:39 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-24 21:44 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 07:38 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-25 08:52 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 18:52 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 19:09 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 16:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 05:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 14:46 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 16:40 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 23:01 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:19 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 23:00 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 00:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 17:03 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 12:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-06 15:08 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 22:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 10:19 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-06 19:43 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 15:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 15:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 08:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 08:45 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 14:26 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 10:52 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 11:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 16:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 16:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 21:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-16 07:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 12:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:47 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:12 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:24 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 17:35 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 17:36 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 09:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 15:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 14:14 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 21:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:58 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:00 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 05:50 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 13:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 12:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 16:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 08:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 14:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:46 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 16:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 14:13 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 19:55 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 23:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 15:36 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 20:22 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700
Page 4 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 11:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6bb39828-d287-4334-a59c-eda40490fc37n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878044 |
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:52:37 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said: > > > On 25-July-23 12:38 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > >> > >> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > > > > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > > someone else to solve. > > > >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. > > > > > > > > > >> My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. > >> On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. > > > > > >>> > >>> What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? > >> > >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces > >> where the engine will be kept.) > > > > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction between > > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think that the > > mercury won't become involved in that? > > > >> > >> Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. > Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a > matter between you and the Australian patent office. And not the USPTO?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-26 19:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kid2baF25gsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878046 |
On 2023-07-25 18:50:42 +0000, Jeffrey Rubard said: > On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:52:37 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said:>> > On 25-July-23 12:38 >> am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:> >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 >> UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote:> >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee >> wrote:> >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam >> Banerjee wrote:> >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, >> corella wrote:> >>>>>> >> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926> >> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> How will the mercury stay in place in space?> >>> >> >> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that.> >> > >> You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for> > >> someone else to solve.> >> >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will >> help in far outer space.> >> >> >> >> >> My insight is that this will >> work extremely well in far outer space.> >> On high altitude say at 100 >> Km gravity will work.> >> >> >>>> >>> What will the mercury do when >> large currents pass through it?> >>> >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation >> will be allowed in the evacuated spaces> >> where the engine will be >> kept.)> >> > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction >> between> > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think >> that the> > mercury won't become involved in that?> >> >>> >> Let us >> agree that I have at least made a new invention. >> Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a> >> matter between you and the Australian patent office. > > And not the USPTO? Unless he has moved (and I confess I haven't followed his movements) he's in Melbourne. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a0ad597e-fa1d-4735-aa81-3d165eb2aad8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878096 |
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:10:09 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-07-25 18:50:42 +0000, Jeffrey Rubard said: > > > On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:52:37 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > >> On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said:>> > On 25-July-23 12:38 > >> am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:> >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 > >> UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote:> >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee > >> wrote:> >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam > >> Banerjee wrote:> >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, > >> corella wrote:> >>>>>> > >> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926> > >> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> How will the mercury stay in place in space?> >>> >> > >> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that.> >> > > >> You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for> > > >> someone else to solve.> >> >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will > >> help in far outer space.> >> >> >> >> >> My insight is that this will > >> work extremely well in far outer space.> >> On high altitude say at 100 > >> Km gravity will work.> >> >> >>>> >>> What will the mercury do when > >> large currents pass through it?> >>> >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation > >> will be allowed in the evacuated spaces> >> where the engine will be > >> kept.)> >> > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction > >> between> > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think > >> that the> > mercury won't become involved in that?> >> >>> >> Let us > >> agree that I have at least made a new invention. > >> Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a> > >> matter between you and the Australian patent office. > > > > And not the USPTO? > Unless he has moved (and I confess I haven't followed his movements) > he's in Melbourne. > -- "This is a hoax, right?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-26 16:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f8a2edec-bd2d-4a4d-a1e7-f1d5c830213fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878117 |
On Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 04:53:44 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:10:09 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2023-07-25 18:50:42 +0000, Jeffrey Rubard said: > > > > > On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:52:37 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > >> On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said:>> > On 25-July-23 12:38 > > >> am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:> >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 > > >> UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote:> >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee > > >> wrote:> >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam > > >> Banerjee wrote:> >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, > > >> corella wrote:> >>>>>> > > >> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926> > > >> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> How will the mercury stay in place in space?> >>> >> > > >> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that.> >> > > > >> You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for> > > > >> someone else to solve.> >> >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will > > >> help in far outer space.> >> >> >> >> >> My insight is that this will > > >> work extremely well in far outer space.> >> On high altitude say at 100 > > >> Km gravity will work.> >> >> >>>> >>> What will the mercury do when > > >> large currents pass through it?> >>> >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation > > >> will be allowed in the evacuated spaces> >> where the engine will be > > >> kept.)> >> > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction > > >> between> > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think > > >> that the> > mercury won't become involved in that?> >> >>> >> Let us > > >> agree that I have at least made a new invention. > > >> Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a> > > >> matter between you and the Australian patent office. > > > > > > And not the USPTO? > > Unless he has moved (and I confess I haven't followed his movements) > > he's in Melbourne. > > -- > "This is a hoax, right?" Continue with your headless chook perambulations, keep on flapping.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 05:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0427b26e-9340-4d06-a0f7-f464042db428n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878139 |
On Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 09:52:04 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 04:53:44 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:10:09 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > On 2023-07-25 18:50:42 +0000, Jeffrey Rubard said: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:52:37 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > >> On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said:>> > On 25-July-23 12:38 > > > >> am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:> >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 > > > >> UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote:> >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee > > > >> wrote:> >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam > > > >> Banerjee wrote:> >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, > > > >> corella wrote:> >>>>>> > > > >> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926> > > > >> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> How will the mercury stay in place in space?> >>> >> > > > >> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that.> >> > > > > >> You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for> > > > > >> someone else to solve.> >> >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will > > > >> help in far outer space.> >> >> >> >> >> My insight is that this will > > > >> work extremely well in far outer space.> >> On high altitude say at 100 > > > >> Km gravity will work.> >> >> >>>> >>> What will the mercury do when > > > >> large currents pass through it?> >>> >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation > > > >> will be allowed in the evacuated spaces> >> where the engine will be > > > >> kept.)> >> > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction > > > >> between> > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think > > > >> that the> > mercury won't become involved in that?> >> >>> >> Let us > > > >> agree that I have at least made a new invention. > > > >> Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a> > > > >> matter between you and the Australian patent office. > > > > > > > > And not the USPTO? > > > Unless he has moved (and I confess I haven't followed his movements) > > > he's in Melbourne. > > > -- > > "This is a hoax, right?" > Continue with your headless chook perambulations, keep on flapping. Well, representing the topless heights of the Western intellect, what do we have here to counter me in this most open, global, unique forum? Headless chooks, extraordinary incompetents, surly creatures, freaks, imbeciles etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 11:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8a45fab7-20ef-4ca8-9a34-cfdedda8f382n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878173 |
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:07:55 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 09:52:04 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 04:53:44 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:10:09 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > > On 2023-07-25 18:50:42 +0000, Jeffrey Rubard said: > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:52:37 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > > >> On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said:>> > On 25-July-23 12:38 > > > > >> am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:> >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 > > > > >> UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote:> >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee > > > > >> wrote:> >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam > > > > >> Banerjee wrote:> >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, > > > > >> corella wrote:> >>>>>> > > > > >> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926> > > > > >> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> How will the mercury stay in place in space?> >>> >> > > > > >> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that.> >> > > > > > >> You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for> > > > > > >> someone else to solve.> >> >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will > > > > >> help in far outer space.> >> >> >> >> >> My insight is that this will > > > > >> work extremely well in far outer space.> >> On high altitude say at 100 > > > > >> Km gravity will work.> >> >> >>>> >>> What will the mercury do when > > > > >> large currents pass through it?> >>> >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation > > > > >> will be allowed in the evacuated spaces> >> where the engine will be > > > > >> kept.)> >> > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction > > > > >> between> > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think > > > > >> that the> > mercury won't become involved in that?> >> >>> >> Let us > > > > >> agree that I have at least made a new invention. > > > > >> Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a> > > > > >> matter between you and the Australian patent office. > > > > > > > > > > And not the USPTO? > > > > Unless he has moved (and I confess I haven't followed his movements) > > > > he's in Melbourne. > > > > -- > > > "This is a hoax, right?" > > Continue with your headless chook perambulations, keep on flapping. > Well, representing the topless heights of the Western intellect, what do we have here to counter me in this most open, global, unique forum? Headless chooks, extraordinary incompetents, surly creatures, freaks, imbeciles etc. "You're getting too stupid for your own good, here."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 14:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kifvs4Fga63U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878183 |
On 7/27/2023 1:19 PM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:07:55 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 09:52:04 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 04:53:44 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:10:09 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >>>>> On 2023-07-25 18:50:42 +0000, Jeffrey Rubard said: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:52:37 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said:>> > On 25-July-23 12:38 >>>>>>> am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:> >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 >>>>>>> UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote:> >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee >>>>>>> wrote:> >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam >>>>>>> Banerjee wrote:> >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, >>>>>>> corella wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How will the mercury stay in place in space?> >>> >> >>>>>>> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that.> >> > >>>>>>> You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for> > >>>>>>> someone else to solve.> >> >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will >>>>>>> help in far outer space.> >> >> >> >> >> My insight is that this will >>>>>>> work extremely well in far outer space.> >> On high altitude say at 100 >>>>>>> Km gravity will work.> >> >> >>>> >>> What will the mercury do when >>>>>>> large currents pass through it?> >>> >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation >>>>>>> will be allowed in the evacuated spaces> >> where the engine will be >>>>>>> kept.)> >> > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction >>>>>>> between> > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think >>>>>>> that the> > mercury won't become involved in that?> >> >>> >> Let us >>>>>>> agree that I have at least made a new invention. >>>>>>> Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a> >>>>>>> matter between you and the Australian patent office. >>>>>> >>>>>> And not the USPTO? >>>>> Unless he has moved (and I confess I haven't followed his movements) >>>>> he's in Melbourne. >>>>> -- >>>> "This is a hoax, right?" >>> Continue with your headless chook perambulations, keep on flapping. >> Well, representing the topless heights of the Western intellect, what do we have here to counter me in this most open, global, unique forum? Headless chooks, extraordinary incompetents, surly creatures, freaks, imbeciles etc. > > "You're getting too stupid for your own good, here." He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 16:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3eb1b017-c0fc-4f61-96c1-312f23b5c3f5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878190 |
On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > On 7/27/2023 1:19 PM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:07:55 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 09:52:04 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 04:53:44 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:10:09 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > >>>>> On 2023-07-25 18:50:42 +0000, Jeffrey Rubard said: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:52:37 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > >>>>>>> On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said:>> > On 25-July-23 12:38 > >>>>>>> am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:> >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 > >>>>>>> UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote:> >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee > >>>>>>> wrote:> >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam > >>>>>>> Banerjee wrote:> >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, > >>>>>>> corella wrote:> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How will the mercury stay in place in space?> >>> >> > >>>>>>> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that.> >> > > >>>>>>> You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for> > > >>>>>>> someone else to solve.> >> >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will > >>>>>>> help in far outer space.> >> >> >> >> >> My insight is that this will > >>>>>>> work extremely well in far outer space.> >> On high altitude say at 100 > >>>>>>> Km gravity will work.> >> >> >>>> >>> What will the mercury do when > >>>>>>> large currents pass through it?> >>> >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation > >>>>>>> will be allowed in the evacuated spaces> >> where the engine will be > >>>>>>> kept.)> >> > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction > >>>>>>> between> > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think > >>>>>>> that the> > mercury won't become involved in that?> >> >>> >> Let us > >>>>>>> agree that I have at least made a new invention. > >>>>>>> Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a> > >>>>>>> matter between you and the Australian patent office. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And not the USPTO? > >>>>> Unless he has moved (and I confess I haven't followed his movements) > >>>>> he's in Melbourne. > >>>>> -- > >>>> "This is a hoax, right?" > >>> Continue with your headless chook perambulations, keep on flapping. > >> Well, representing the topless heights of the Western intellect, what do we have here to counter me in this most open, global, unique forum? Headless chooks, extraordinary incompetents, surly creatures, freaks, imbeciles etc. > > > > "You're getting too stupid for your own good, here." Thus squawks the height of US intellect available publicly for free. > He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > time. Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 18:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <88b6c872-31aa-44b0-9aac-b3089f4663b5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878201 |
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > > time. > Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 23:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kigst3Fkqb5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878203 |
On 7/27/2023 8:19 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>> He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long >>> time. > >> Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > > Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! > > I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! Your dead dog knows more about everything than Arindam Banerjee.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 22:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fa1f89dc-eefa-4599-82ea-92a7125f18ccn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878204 |
On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 14:01:44 UTC+10, whodat (after gulping prodigious quantities of laxatives obtained from Archie) wrote: > Your dead dog knows more about everything than Arindam Banerjee. twisting it out with great difficulty.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <13a1fc24-a126-4c03-8063-e58f3ee5c4e9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878204 |
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:01:44 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 7/27/2023 8:19 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > >>> He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > >>> time. > > > >> Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > > > > Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! > > > > I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! > Your dead dog knows more about everything than Arindam Banerjee. For the Audience: "Yeah, we've seen that one before."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 14:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kinrdpFo1j3U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878242 |
On 7/29/2023 10:35 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:01:44 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 7/27/2023 8:19 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>> >>>>> He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long >>>>> time. >>> >>>> Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? >>> >>> Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! >>> >>> I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! >> Your dead dog knows more about everything than Arindam Banerjee. > > For the Audience: "Yeah, we've seen that one before." We're all counting on your short memory that encourages your laughter at each new iteration.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 14:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <133d685d-63b0-485d-8dca-07ce5eca5f52n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878319 |
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 12:19:27 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 7/29/2023 10:35 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:01:44 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >> On 7/27/2023 8:19 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>> On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>> > >>>>> He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > >>>>> time. > >>> > >>>> Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > >>> > >>> Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! > >>> > >>> I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! > >> Your dead dog knows more about everything than Arindam Banerjee. > > > > For the Audience: "Yeah, we've seen that one before." > We're all counting on your short memory that encourages your > laughter at each new iteration. You mean you're all nuts and can't reason logically? "Seems so."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 22:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7e1b1e86-7acc-46e2-9973-b86c087a967an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878203 |
On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 11:19:05 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > > > time. > > > Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks I have no wish to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. Having stupid whodumbos for devotees - ugh, what a thought! > by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? I have done that many a time. Lazy robot, go find out the links. > This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! Following my 2022 video films, constipational crises has overtaken their laughter. How is the armature getting accelerated along the rails? As there is still some honesty left in the newbies, they will not accept the whodat-Moroney theory that the table/floor is inclined so that it moves by gravity and also by my single finger. Well then, what is happening???? Is the armature getting accelerated by magic? Are quarks, bosons, strings, photons, gravitons, dark matter, black holes, etc. involved in this??? The Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks are dumb about this!!!!! Rotating-head pea-soup emitting robots like Alsing cannot understand that. Beyond its programming, so the robot Alsing will resort to its exception handling pea-soup emitting routine, produced below: > I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! Actually the late Bertram Wilberforce Wooster (Bertie) knew more genuine physics than the Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks. Bertie was such a friend, companion and encourager in the early days of my discovery of the formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) and efforts of its development by literary and engineering means. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 23:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2426a4df-b85c-4479-b52e-fd008badcd51n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878205 |
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:32:51 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 11:19:05 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > > > He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > > > > time. > > > > > Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > > Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks > I have no wish to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. Having stupid whodumbos for devotees - ugh, what a thought! > > by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? > I have done that many a time. Lazy robot, go find out the links. > > This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! > Following my 2022 video films, constipational crises has overtaken their laughter. > How is the armature getting accelerated along the rails? As there is still some honesty left in the newbies, they will not accept the whodat-Moroney theory that the table/floor is inclined so that it moves by gravity and also by my single finger. > Well then, what is happening???? > Is the armature getting accelerated by magic? > Are quarks, bosons, strings, photons, gravitons, dark matter, black holes, etc. involved in this??? > The Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks are dumb about this!!!!! > Rotating-head pea-soup emitting robots like Alsing cannot understand that. > > Beyond its programming, so the robot Alsing will resort to its exception handling pea-soup emitting routine, produced below: > > I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! > Actually the late Bertram Wilberforce Wooster (Bertie) knew more genuine physics than the Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks. > Bertie was such a friend, companion and encourager in the early days of my discovery of the formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) and efforts of its development by literary and engineering means. Yes, that is all fine and dandy... but what about that frozen solar core? A lot of newbies here are frothing at the mouth in anticipation of your theory... you dont want to didappointhem, do you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-28 00:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <24ad4bd4-e61b-4bed-b70d-5be98137a5c9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878210 |
On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 16:00:53 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:32:51 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 11:19:05 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > > > > > He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > > > > > time. > > > > > > > Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > > > Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks > > I have no wish to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. Having stupid whodumbos for devotees - ugh, what a thought! > > > by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? > > I have done that many a time. Lazy robot, go find out the links. > > > This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! > > Following my 2022 video films, constipational crises has overtaken their laughter. > > How is the armature getting accelerated along the rails? As there is still some honesty left in the newbies, they will not accept the whodat-Moroney theory that the table/floor is inclined so that it moves by gravity and also by my single finger. > > Well then, what is happening???? > > Is the armature getting accelerated by magic? > > Are quarks, bosons, strings, photons, gravitons, dark matter, black holes, etc. involved in this??? > > The Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks are dumb about this!!!!! > > Rotating-head pea-soup emitting robots like Alsing cannot understand that. > > > > Beyond its programming, so the robot Alsing will resort to its exception handling pea-soup emitting routine, produced below: > > > I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! > > > Actually the late Bertram Wilberforce Wooster (Bertie) knew more genuine physics than the Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks. > > Bertie was such a friend, companion and encourager in the early days of my discovery of the formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) and efforts of its development by literary and engineering means. > Yes, that is all fine and dandy... but what about that frozen solar core? A lot of newbies here are frothing at the mouth in anticipation of your theory... you dont want to didappointhem, do you? So why not find and post the links, Alsing? Be a good robot, now. If you cannot as you got rusted, let me know.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9f77ea3c-c0f3-4956-bd71-342ca70d3d81n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878205 |
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:32:51 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 11:19:05 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > > > He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > > > > time. > > > > > Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > > Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks > I have no wish to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. Having stupid whodumbos for devotees - ugh, what a thought! > > by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? > I have done that many a time. Lazy robot, go find out the links. > > This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! > Following my 2022 video films, constipational crises has overtaken their laughter. > How is the armature getting accelerated along the rails? As there is still some honesty left in the newbies, they will not accept the whodat-Moroney theory that the table/floor is inclined so that it moves by gravity and also by my single finger. > Well then, what is happening???? > Is the armature getting accelerated by magic? > Are quarks, bosons, strings, photons, gravitons, dark matter, black holes, etc. involved in this??? > The Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks are dumb about this!!!!! > Rotating-head pea-soup emitting robots like Alsing cannot understand that. > > Beyond its programming, so the robot Alsing will resort to its exception handling pea-soup emitting routine, produced below: > > I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! > Actually the late Bertram Wilberforce Wooster (Bertie) knew more genuine physics than the Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks. > Bertie was such a friend, companion and encourager in the early days of my discovery of the formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) and efforts of its development by literary and engineering means. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee "Do you know what? It strikes me as though that Indian on Twitter Vivek Ramaswamy has been doing something like an imitation of the dictator in Jeeves and Wooster..." #probablyacommonthought
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-29 17:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <52b5ca0b-3cfe-4417-8441-07f5abee06d0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878244 |
On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 01:35:58 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:32:51 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 11:19:05 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > > > > > > He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long > > > > > time. > > > > > > > Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? > > > Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks > > I have no wish to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. Having stupid whodumbos for devotees - ugh, what a thought! > > > by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? > > I have done that many a time. Lazy robot, go find out the links. > > > This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! > > Following my 2022 video films, constipational crises has overtaken their laughter. > > How is the armature getting accelerated along the rails? As there is still some honesty left in the newbies, they will not accept the whodat-Moroney theory that the table/floor is inclined so that it moves by gravity and also by my single finger. > > Well then, what is happening???? > > Is the armature getting accelerated by magic? > > Are quarks, bosons, strings, photons, gravitons, dark matter, black holes, etc. involved in this??? > > The Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks are dumb about this!!!!! > > Rotating-head pea-soup emitting robots like Alsing cannot understand that. > > > > Beyond its programming, so the robot Alsing will resort to its exception handling pea-soup emitting routine, produced below: > > > I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! > > Actually the late Bertram Wilberforce Wooster (Bertie) knew more genuine physics than the Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks. > > Bertie was such a friend, companion and encourager in the early days of my discovery of the formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) and efforts of its development by literary and engineering means. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > "Do you know what? It strikes me as though that Indian on Twitter Vivek Ramaswamy has been doing something like an imitation of the dictator in Jeeves and Wooster..." And that is the best response I can get from the land of the free and the land of the brave. Heh. Cannot anyone from the Ivy League do better than this headless chook? #probablyacommonthought
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 14:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kinrhlFo1j3U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878244 |
On 7/29/2023 10:35 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:32:51 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 11:19:05 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 05:46:20 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>> >>>>> He has been too stupid for his own good everywhere for quite a long >>>>> time. >>> >>>> Whodumbo, what is the slope of my garden shed that allows the armature to run down the rails with the force from gravity? >>> Arindam, why don't you seal your membership in the Hall of Fame for Complete Dumbfucks >> I have no wish to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. Having stupid whodumbos for devotees - ugh, what a thought! >>> by telling us again just why the core of our Sun is freezing? >> I have done that many a time. Lazy robot, go find out the links. >>> This should be good for a laugh from anyone who is new here! Go ahead, it is always a laugh to read what you have to say! >> Following my 2022 video films, constipational crises has overtaken their laughter. >> How is the armature getting accelerated along the rails? As there is still some honesty left in the newbies, they will not accept the whodat-Moroney theory that the table/floor is inclined so that it moves by gravity and also by my single finger. >> Well then, what is happening???? >> Is the armature getting accelerated by magic? >> Are quarks, bosons, strings, photons, gravitons, dark matter, black holes, etc. involved in this??? >> The Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks are dumb about this!!!!! >> Rotating-head pea-soup emitting robots like Alsing cannot understand that. >> >> Beyond its programming, so the robot Alsing will resort to its exception handling pea-soup emitting routine, produced below: >>> I will say in advance that my dead dog knows more physics than you do! >> Actually the late Bertram Wilberforce Wooster (Bertie) knew more genuine physics than the Most Highly Esteemed Complete Dumbfucks. >> Bertie was such a friend, companion and encourager in the early days of my discovery of the formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) and efforts of its development by literary and engineering means. >> >> Cheers, >> Arindam Banerjee > > "Do you know what? It strikes me as though that Indian on Twitter Vivek Ramaswamy has been doing something like an imitation of the dictator in Jeeves and Wooster..." #probablyacommonthought Actually when you get right down to it this Indian is not that smart.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web