Groups > sci.physics > #865669 > unrolled thread

When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?

Started by	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
First post	2022-12-07 01:33 -0800
Last post	2022-12-14 18:03 -0800
Articles	20 on this page of 126 — 16 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →

#865692

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 14:02 -0800
Message-ID	<d3b22171-aa4e-4cf1-81d1-61f9449b397cn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865679

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 04:16:08 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Jim Pennino <ji...@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote: 
> > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> > 
> > As there is copious, independent third party evidence from all over the 
> > globe that the moon landings happened, I would say never. 
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
Heh-heh.
All e=mcc=hv breathing parties are suspect, cannot be trusted.
From moon landing creativity they are now in blackhole bigbang creativity with computer art.
The global racketeers are certainly well connected and nicely unified, I suppose telecom was funded well for that.
They all know what lies to tell.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865690

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 13:56 -0800
Message-ID	<f9e56ea6-5352-407b-ba67-12f8b0a73d1fn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865676

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe.
> As there is copious, independent third party evidence from all over the 
> globe that the moon landings happened, I would say never.

Never say never again.
All parties that howl e=mcc-hv are liars and frauds, by deductive logic.
Within a few decades, ships with IFEs will make regular joyflights to the Moon and back and then we will all see what was what.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865695

From	Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date	2022-12-07 14:04 -0800
Message-ID	<98f76j-3t1t1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to	#865690

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe.
>> As there is copious, independent third party evidence from all over the 
>> globe that the moon landings happened, I would say never.
> 
> Never say never again.
> All parties that howl e=mcc-hv are liars and frauds, by deductive logic.
> Within a few decades, ships with IFEs will make regular joyflights to the Moon and back and then we will all see what was what.
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

Yeah, sure, but they will be powered by pixie dust.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865698

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 14:33 -0800
Message-ID	<1472f521-3097-4a6f-98e6-8e057b080a15n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865695

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:16:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> >> As there is copious, independent third party evidence from all over the 
> >> globe that the moon landings happened, I would say never. 
> > 
> > Never say never again. 
> > All parties that howl e=mcc-hv are liars and frauds, by deductive logic. 
> > Within a few decades, ships with IFEs will make regular joyflights to the Moon and back and then we will all see what was what. 
> > Cheers, 
> > Arindam Banerjee
> Yeah, sure, but they will be powered by pixie dust.
Hydrogen and oxygen for the early versions.
Pixie dust is for the e=mcc wallahs. They use it for fooling for funding.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866416

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date	2022-12-18 12:35 +1100
Message-ID	<k0792fFaa6bU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#865676

On 08-Dec-22 3:21 am, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe.
> 
> As there is copious, independent third party evidence from all over the
> globe that the moon landings happened, I would say never.
> 
> 

That Mitchell and Webb Look - Moon Landing Sketch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865677

From	Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com>
Date	2022-12-07 11:37 -0500
Message-ID	<tmqffs$1pem$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#865669

On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe.

But 12 US astronauts did!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865691

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 13:58 -0800
Message-ID	<1a0fbede-93ee-4a06-8fd3-1e7acc757f29n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865677

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
> 
> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe.
> But 12 US astronauts did!
And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not.
Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard.
(The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865696

From	Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date	2022-12-07 14:16 -0800
Message-ID	<auf76j-3t1t1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to	#865691

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
>> 
>> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe.
>> But 12 US astronauts did!
> And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not.
> Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard.
> (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".)

Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the
Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24
missions that returned samples from the Moon.

The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5
by China.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865699

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 14:36 -0800
Message-ID	<70fa3c94-bb1d-4da5-87c5-6fef20a30a99n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865696

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".)
> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
> 
> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
> by China.
Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend in some newfangled lunar module to play out golfing shots on the lunar surface? I had once thought that would be the idea of sending robots to the Moon. They may as well have sent three cheeses.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865709

From	Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date	2022-12-07 16:24 -0800
Message-ID	<3fn76j-faat1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to	#865699

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
>> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
>> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
>> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
>> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
>> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".)
>> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
>> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
>> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
>> 
>> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
>> by China.
> Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend

Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865710

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 17:54 -0800
Message-ID	<64ac804f-3b47-4a41-bbbc-da1d44a035f6n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865709

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> >> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
> >> >> 
> >> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> >> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
> >> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
> >> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
> >> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".) 
> >> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
> >> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
> >> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
> >> 
> >> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
> >> by China. 
> > Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend
> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies.

The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology.
So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that. 

The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865715

From	Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date	2022-12-07 18:48 -0800
Message-ID	<bsv76j-8jgt1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to	#865710

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
>> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
>> >> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
>> >> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
>> >> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
>> >> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
>> >> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".) 
>> >> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
>> >> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
>> >> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
>> >> 
>> >> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
>> >> by China. 
>> > Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend
>> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies.
> 
> The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology.
> So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that. 

The real world could not care less about you nor does it expend any
effort to suppress you as your stupidity is already doing a bang up good
job of that.

> 
> The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered.

In the real world autonomous robots are not put into unmanned space
craft as doing so would be blazingly stupid on many levels.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865721

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 19:35 -0800
Message-ID	<ddca483d-7778-4093-8466-e0a53b1ac89bn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865715

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:01:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> >> >> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> >> >> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
> >> >> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
> >> >> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
> >> >> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".) 
> >> >> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
> >> >> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
> >> >> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
> >> >> 
> >> >> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
> >> >> by China. 
> >> > Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend 
> >> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies. 
> > 
> > The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology. 
> > So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that.
> The real world could not care less about you nor does it expend any 
> effort to suppress you as your stupidity is already doing a bang up good 
> job of that.

The real world that matters *to me* loves me a lot, and supports me to the full, for my abovementioned works, and a lot more.
Really, I am very fortunate to get the affection of those who matter to me. Something denied to my peers, such as Newton and Tesla.
For the rest, that is, the real world of politics and corruption, indifferent to anything but their self-interest, my contempt.
 
> > The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered.

> In the real world autonomous robots are not put into unmanned space 
> craft as doing so would be blazingly stupid on many levels.

Still no answer, as to why 1969 technology was so much superior to 2022 technology.
Real answer: As 2022 tech is superior to 1969 technology, the "moon landings" were done in some US desert.  The money given was used to hone photoshopping skills among other things.
Surfacing question: Why were USSR, China, etc. silent?
Answer: Wheeling-dealing, behind the scenes. Blackmail scopes. You send Apollo, we send Lunokhod. Now, shhh. Both superpowers happy, and the thirdworld is fooled. What fun.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865722

From	Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 19:38 -0800
Message-ID	<aa3dc7e2-5e39-4b45-b686-729b9683419dn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865721

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:35:46 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:01:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > >> >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> > >> >> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
> > >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> > >> >> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
> > >> >> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
> > >> >> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
> > >> >> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".) 
> > >> >> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
> > >> >> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
> > >> >> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
> > >> >> by China. 
> > >> > Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend 
> > >> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies. 
> > > 
> > > The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology. 
> > > So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that. 
> > The real world could not care less about you nor does it expend any 
> > effort to suppress you as your stupidity is already doing a bang up good 
> > job of that.
> The real world that matters *to me* loves me a lot, and supports me to the full, for my abovementioned works, and a lot more. 
> Really, I am very fortunate to get the affection of those who matter to me. Something denied to my peers, such as Newton and Tesla. 
> For the rest, that is, the real world of politics and corruption, indifferent to anything but their self-interest, my contempt.
> > > The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered. 
> 
> > In the real world autonomous robots are not put into unmanned space 
> > craft as doing so would be blazingly stupid on many levels.
> Still no answer, as to why 1969 technology was so much superior to 2022 technology. 
> Real answer: As 2022 tech is superior to 1969 technology, the "moon landings" were done in some US desert. The money given was used to hone photoshopping skills among other things. 
> Surfacing question: Why were USSR, China, etc. silent? 
> Answer: Wheeling-dealing, behind the scenes. Blackmail scopes. You send Apollo, we send Lunokhod. Now, shhh. Both superpowers happy, and the thirdworld is fooled. What fun.

Unfortunately for you, you have *zero* evidence to support your position... as always! You are just another fart in the wind...

FAITH, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks
without knowledge, of things without parallel.

--Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865724

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 19:48 -0800
Message-ID	<bd86920e-c163-4e48-a1d6-fde06f992e5fn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865722

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:38:51 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:35:46 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:01:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > > >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > >> >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> > > >> >> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
> > > >> >> >> 
> > > >> >> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> > > >> >> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
> > > >> >> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
> > > >> >> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
> > > >> >> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".) 
> > > >> >> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
> > > >> >> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
> > > >> >> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
> > > >> >> by China. 
> > > >> > Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend 
> > > >> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies. 
> > > > 
> > > > The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology. 
> > > > So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that. 
> > > The real world could not care less about you nor does it expend any 
> > > effort to suppress you as your stupidity is already doing a bang up good 
> > > job of that. 
> > The real world that matters *to me* loves me a lot, and supports me to the full, for my abovementioned works, and a lot more. 
> > Really, I am very fortunate to get the affection of those who matter to me. Something denied to my peers, such as Newton and Tesla. 
> > For the rest, that is, the real world of politics and corruption, indifferent to anything but their self-interest, my contempt. 
> > > > The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered. 
> > 
> > > In the real world autonomous robots are not put into unmanned space 
> > > craft as doing so would be blazingly stupid on many levels. 
> > Still no answer, as to why 1969 technology was so much superior to 2022 technology. 
> > Real answer: As 2022 tech is superior to 1969 technology, the "moon landings" were done in some US desert. The money given was used to hone photoshopping skills among other things. 
> > Surfacing question: Why were USSR, China, etc. silent? 
> > Answer: Wheeling-dealing, behind the scenes. Blackmail scopes. You send Apollo, we send Lunokhod. Now, shhh. Both superpowers happy, and the thirdworld is fooled. What fun.


> Unfortunately for you, you have *zero* evidence to support your position... as always! You are just another fart in the wind... 

I am stating the way the political world works, with no scruples that is.  
 
> FAITH, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks 
> without knowledge, of things without parallel. 

Wrong definition by some fool of an atheist.
Faith is what moves mountains, that is, does great and wonderful things, beyond the scope of the lying sneering parasites.
 
> --Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"

Some fool, unworthy of the devil's attention.

I have given 6 key facts as evidence, repeated below
1. The deep footprint on the surface, just as it would be for a 200 lb-er on planet Earth.
2. The cheerfully waving US flag.
3. The angle at which the astronauts stood, showing that they really weighed 200lb. Had they weighed 30 or so their backs would be straight.
4. Shadows going all over the place.
5. The great photo of one astronaut, very clear, absolutely frontal, now who took that? The other one is shown on the screen, but he is not taking any photo of the man.
6. The cleanly resting legs of the lunar module. If the ground was that soft to make such a footprint, surely the blast would have left a different impact, blowing soil away, or the legs should have sunk i9n deeper like the footprint.

(I neglect the stars stuff that should have come up on the films,)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865726

From	Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 19:54 -0800
Message-ID	<9338075a-fceb-4618-b690-043246c25780n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865724

On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:38:51 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:35:46 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:01:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > > > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > > > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > > > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > > >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > > > >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > > >> >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> > > > >> >> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
> > > > >> >> >> 
> > > > >> >> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> > > > >> >> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
> > > > >> >> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
> > > > >> >> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
> > > > >> >> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".) 
> > > > >> >> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
> > > > >> >> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
> > > > >> >> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
> > > > >> >> by China. 
> > > > >> > Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend 
> > > > >> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology. 
> > > > > So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that. 
> > > > The real world could not care less about you nor does it expend any 
> > > > effort to suppress you as your stupidity is already doing a bang up good 
> > > > job of that. 
> > > The real world that matters *to me* loves me a lot, and supports me to the full, for my abovementioned works, and a lot more. 
> > > Really, I am very fortunate to get the affection of those who matter to me. Something denied to my peers, such as Newton and Tesla. 
> > > For the rest, that is, the real world of politics and corruption, indifferent to anything but their self-interest, my contempt. 
> > > > > The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered. 
> > > 
> > > > In the real world autonomous robots are not put into unmanned space 
> > > > craft as doing so would be blazingly stupid on many levels. 
> > > Still no answer, as to why 1969 technology was so much superior to 2022 technology. 
> > > Real answer: As 2022 tech is superior to 1969 technology, the "moon landings" were done in some US desert. The money given was used to hone photoshopping skills among other things. 
> > > Surfacing question: Why were USSR, China, etc. silent? 
> > > Answer: Wheeling-dealing, behind the scenes. Blackmail scopes. You send Apollo, we send Lunokhod. Now, shhh. Both superpowers happy, and the thirdworld is fooled. What fun. 
> 
> 
> > Unfortunately for you, you have *zero* evidence to support your position... as always! You are just another fart in the wind...
> I am stating the way the political world works, with no scruples that is.
> > FAITH, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks 
> > without knowledge, of things without parallel.
> Wrong definition by some fool of an atheist. 
> Faith is what moves mountains, that is, does great and wonderful things, beyond the scope of the lying sneering parasites.
> > --Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
> Some fool, unworthy of the devil's attention. 
> 
> I have given 6 key facts as evidence, repeated below
> 1. The deep footprint on the surface, just as it would be for a 200 lb-er on planet Earth. 
> 2. The cheerfully waving US flag. 
> 3. The angle at which the astronauts stood, showing that they really weighed 200lb. Had they weighed 30 or so their backs would be straight. 
> 4. Shadows going all over the place. 
> 5. The great photo of one astronaut, very clear, absolutely frontal, now who took that? The other one is shown on the screen, but he is not taking any photo of the man. 
> 6. The cleanly resting legs of the lunar module. If the ground was that soft to make such a footprint, surely the blast would have left a different impact, blowing soil away, or the legs should have sunk i9n deeper like the footprint.
> (I neglect the stars stuff that should have come up on the films,)

Read the links, dimbulb...

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865728

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-07 20:21 -0800
Message-ID	<e16c81b4-74e5-4ae9-b082-ed43f889f402n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865726

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:54:58 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:38:51 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:35:46 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:01:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > > > > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > > > > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > > > > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > > > >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > > > > >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > > > >> >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> > > > > >> >> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
> > > > > >> >> >> 
> > > > > >> >> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> > > > > >> >> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
> > > > > >> >> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
> > > > > >> >> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
> > > > > >> >> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".) 
> > > > > >> >> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
> > > > > >> >> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
> > > > > >> >> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
> > > > > >> >> 
> > > > > >> >> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
> > > > > >> >> by China. 
> > > > > >> > Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend 
> > > > > >> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology. 
> > > > > > So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that. 
> > > > > The real world could not care less about you nor does it expend any 
> > > > > effort to suppress you as your stupidity is already doing a bang up good 
> > > > > job of that. 
> > > > The real world that matters *to me* loves me a lot, and supports me to the full, for my abovementioned works, and a lot more. 
> > > > Really, I am very fortunate to get the affection of those who matter to me. Something denied to my peers, such as Newton and Tesla. 
> > > > For the rest, that is, the real world of politics and corruption, indifferent to anything but their self-interest, my contempt. 
> > > > > > The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered. 
> > > > 
> > > > > In the real world autonomous robots are not put into unmanned space 
> > > > > craft as doing so would be blazingly stupid on many levels. 
> > > > Still no answer, as to why 1969 technology was so much superior to 2022 technology. 
> > > > Real answer: As 2022 tech is superior to 1969 technology, the "moon landings" were done in some US desert. The money given was used to hone photoshopping skills among other things. 
> > > > Surfacing question: Why were USSR, China, etc. silent? 
> > > > Answer: Wheeling-dealing, behind the scenes. Blackmail scopes. You send Apollo, we send Lunokhod. Now, shhh. Both superpowers happy, and the thirdworld is fooled. What fun. 
> > 
> > 
> > > Unfortunately for you, you have *zero* evidence to support your position... as always! You are just another fart in the wind... 
> > I am stating the way the political world works, with no scruples that is. 
> > > FAITH, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks 
> > > without knowledge, of things without parallel. 
> > Wrong definition by some fool of an atheist. 
> > Faith is what moves mountains, that is, does great and wonderful things, beyond the scope of the lying sneering parasites. 
> > > --Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary" 
> > Some fool, unworthy of the devil's attention. 
> > 
> > I have given 6 key facts as evidence, repeated below 
> > 1. The deep footprint on the surface, just as it would be for a 200 lb-er on planet Earth. 
> > 2. The cheerfully waving US flag. 
> > 3. The angle at which the astronauts stood, showing that they really weighed 200lb. Had they weighed 30 or so their backs would be straight. 
> > 4. Shadows going all over the place. 
> > 5. The great photo of one astronaut, very clear, absolutely frontal, now who took that? The other one is shown on the screen, but he is not taking any photo of the man. 
> > 6. The cleanly resting legs of the lunar module. If the ground was that soft to make such a footprint, surely the blast would have left a different impact, blowing soil away, or the legs should have sunk i9n deeper like the footprint. 
> > (I neglect the stars stuff that should have come up on the films,)
> Read the links, dimbulb... 
> 
> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

Won't bother. As you are a brainwashed imbecile, you cannot be expected to argue on your own, or even take out the relevant parts from whatever links you post.
Answer the first point, nah, that is too much to expect.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865735

From	Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date	2022-12-07 21:08 -0800
Message-ID	<83886j-4int1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to	#865728

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:54:58 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:38:51 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:35:46 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> > > > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:01:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
>> > > > > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > > > > > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
>> > > > > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > > > > >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
>> > > > > >> >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > > > > >> >> > On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
>> > > > > >> >> >> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
>> > > > > >> >> >> 
>> > > > > >> >> >> > Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
>> > > > > >> >> >> But 12 US astronauts did! 
>> > > > > >> >> > And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
>> > > > > >> >> > Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
>> > > > > >> >> > (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".) 
>> > > > > >> >> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
>> > > > > >> >> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
>> > > > > >> >> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
>> > > > > >> >> 
>> > > > > >> >> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
>> > > > > >> >> by China. 
>> > > > > >> > Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend 
>> > > > > >> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies. 
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology. 
>> > > > > > So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that. 
>> > > > > The real world could not care less about you nor does it expend any 
>> > > > > effort to suppress you as your stupidity is already doing a bang up good 
>> > > > > job of that. 
>> > > > The real world that matters *to me* loves me a lot, and supports me to the full, for my abovementioned works, and a lot more. 
>> > > > Really, I am very fortunate to get the affection of those who matter to me. Something denied to my peers, such as Newton and Tesla. 
>> > > > For the rest, that is, the real world of politics and corruption, indifferent to anything but their self-interest, my contempt. 
>> > > > > > The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered. 
>> > > > 
>> > > > > In the real world autonomous robots are not put into unmanned space 
>> > > > > craft as doing so would be blazingly stupid on many levels. 
>> > > > Still no answer, as to why 1969 technology was so much superior to 2022 technology. 
>> > > > Real answer: As 2022 tech is superior to 1969 technology, the "moon landings" were done in some US desert. The money given was used to hone photoshopping skills among other things. 
>> > > > Surfacing question: Why were USSR, China, etc. silent? 
>> > > > Answer: Wheeling-dealing, behind the scenes. Blackmail scopes. You send Apollo, we send Lunokhod. Now, shhh. Both superpowers happy, and the thirdworld is fooled. What fun. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > Unfortunately for you, you have *zero* evidence to support your position... as always! You are just another fart in the wind... 
>> > I am stating the way the political world works, with no scruples that is. 
>> > > FAITH, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks 
>> > > without knowledge, of things without parallel. 
>> > Wrong definition by some fool of an atheist. 
>> > Faith is what moves mountains, that is, does great and wonderful things, beyond the scope of the lying sneering parasites. 
>> > > --Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary" 
>> > Some fool, unworthy of the devil's attention. 
>> > 
>> > I have given 6 key facts as evidence, repeated below 
>> > 1. The deep footprint on the surface, just as it would be for a 200 lb-er on planet Earth. 
>> > 2. The cheerfully waving US flag. 
>> > 3. The angle at which the astronauts stood, showing that they really weighed 200lb. Had they weighed 30 or so their backs would be straight. 
>> > 4. Shadows going all over the place. 
>> > 5. The great photo of one astronaut, very clear, absolutely frontal, now who took that? The other one is shown on the screen, but he is not taking any photo of the man. 
>> > 6. The cleanly resting legs of the lunar module. If the ground was that soft to make such a footprint, surely the blast would have left a different impact, blowing soil away, or the legs should have sunk i9n deeper like the footprint. 
>> > (I neglect the stars stuff that should have come up on the films,)
>> Read the links, dimbulb... 
>> 
>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
> 
> Won't bother.

Of course not. Idiots with idiotic "facts" can't be bothered with real
facts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865742

From	Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com>
Date	2022-12-08 01:58 -0500
Message-ID	<tms1v8$q8v$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#865735

On 12/8/2022 12:08 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:54:58 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:38:51 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:35:46 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:01:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But 12 US astronauts did!
>>>>>>>>>>>> And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard.
>>>>>>>>>>>> (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".)
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the
>>>>>>>>>>> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24
>>>>>>>>>>> missions that returned samples from the Moon.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5
>>>>>>>>>>> by China.
>>>>>>>>>> Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend
>>>>>>>>> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology.
>>>>>>>> So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that.
>>>>>>> The real world could not care less about you nor does it expend any
>>>>>>> effort to suppress you as your stupidity is already doing a bang up good
>>>>>>> job of that.
>>>>>> The real world that matters *to me* loves me a lot, and supports me to the full, for my abovementioned works, and a lot more.
>>>>>> Really, I am very fortunate to get the affection of those who matter to me. Something denied to my peers, such as Newton and Tesla.
>>>>>> For the rest, that is, the real world of politics and corruption, indifferent to anything but their self-interest, my contempt.
>>>>>>>> The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the real world autonomous robots are not put into unmanned space
>>>>>>> craft as doing so would be blazingly stupid on many levels.
>>>>>> Still no answer, as to why 1969 technology was so much superior to 2022 technology.
>>>>>> Real answer: As 2022 tech is superior to 1969 technology, the "moon landings" were done in some US desert. The money given was used to hone photoshopping skills among other things.
>>>>>> Surfacing question: Why were USSR, China, etc. silent?
>>>>>> Answer: Wheeling-dealing, behind the scenes. Blackmail scopes. You send Apollo, we send Lunokhod. Now, shhh. Both superpowers happy, and the thirdworld is fooled. What fun.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately for you, you have *zero* evidence to support your position... as always! You are just another fart in the wind...
>>>> I am stating the way the political world works, with no scruples that is.
>>>>> FAITH, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks
>>>>> without knowledge, of things without parallel.
>>>> Wrong definition by some fool of an atheist.
>>>> Faith is what moves mountains, that is, does great and wonderful things, beyond the scope of the lying sneering parasites.
>>>>> --Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
>>>> Some fool, unworthy of the devil's attention.
>>>>
>>>> I have given 6 key facts as evidence, repeated below
>>>> 1. The deep footprint on the surface, just as it would be for a 200 lb-er on planet Earth.
>>>> 2. The cheerfully waving US flag.
>>>> 3. The angle at which the astronauts stood, showing that they really weighed 200lb. Had they weighed 30 or so their backs would be straight.
>>>> 4. Shadows going all over the place.
>>>> 5. The great photo of one astronaut, very clear, absolutely frontal, now who took that? The other one is shown on the screen, but he is not taking any photo of the man.
>>>> 6. The cleanly resting legs of the lunar module. If the ground was that soft to make such a footprint, surely the blast would have left a different impact, blowing soil away, or the legs should have sunk i9n deeper like the footprint.
>>>> (I neglect the stars stuff that should have come up on the films,)
>>> Read the links, dimbulb...
>>>
>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
>>
>> Won't bother.
> 
> Of course not. Idiots with idiotic "facts" can't be bothered with real
> facts.
> 
> 
Again, Banjo is so similar to Plutonium. Pluto considered himself above 
answering a trivial Ohm's Law question, and Banjo can't be bothered to 
check a link which disproves the "evidence" Banjo claims disproves the 
moon landing.

Yet Pluto and Banjo keep getting into kO0kfights when they should be 
good buddies...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865753

From	Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date	2022-12-08 00:49 -0800
Message-ID	<9d42d0f0-9a92-4e18-966f-08090a6193a9n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#865742

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 17:58:55 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 12/8/2022 12:08 AM, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:54:58 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:38:51 UTC+11, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >>>>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 7:35:46 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >>>>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 14:01:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> >>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >>>>>>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 11:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 09:31:09 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 03:37:22 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/7/2022 4:33 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those three robots did not even land on the moon, assuming they got there, and that is a reasonable assumption maybe. 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But 12 US astronauts did! 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> And Huey, Louie and Dewey did not. 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Current skills evidently are not of 1960s imaginative standard. 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> (The Soviets put an unmanned rover (Lunokhod) on the Moon, so they said, and it even brought back "samples".) 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Actually, the Soviets put several unmanned rovers on the Moon under the 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Lunokhod program, but it was the the Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 
> >>>>>>>>>>> missions that returned samples from the Moon. 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> The only other successful unmanned sample and return was the Chang'e 5 
> >>>>>>>>>>> by China. 
> >>>>>>>>>> Then why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey descend 
> >>>>>>>>> Maybe because the real world has nothing to do with your silly fantasies. 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> The real world has everything to do with my thoughts become reality: from mathematical modelling to efficient systems (antennas, call centres, CCS7, computer security), from googling to blogging, from poetry to family values, from bureaucracy to (nascent) superpolitics, and in the future, from improved physics to superb technology. 
> >>>>>>>> So the real world that apparently matters does its best to suppress me, and I gotta admit, has done a very good job at that. 
> >>>>>>> The real world could not care less about you nor does it expend any 
> >>>>>>> effort to suppress you as your stupidity is already doing a bang up good 
> >>>>>>> job of that. 
> >>>>>> The real world that matters *to me* loves me a lot, and supports me to the full, for my abovementioned works, and a lot more. 
> >>>>>> Really, I am very fortunate to get the affection of those who matter to me. Something denied to my peers, such as Newton and Tesla. 
> >>>>>> For the rest, that is, the real world of politics and corruption, indifferent to anything but their self-interest, my contempt. 
> >>>>>>>> The question, why did not Huey, Louie and Dewey not descend to the lunar surface in 2022, as USA humans supposedly did in 1969 with 1969 technology, remains unanswered. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> In the real world autonomous robots are not put into unmanned space 
> >>>>>>> craft as doing so would be blazingly stupid on many levels. 
> >>>>>> Still no answer, as to why 1969 technology was so much superior to 2022 technology. 
> >>>>>> Real answer: As 2022 tech is superior to 1969 technology, the "moon landings" were done in some US desert. The money given was used to hone photoshopping skills among other things. 
> >>>>>> Surfacing question: Why were USSR, China, etc. silent? 
> >>>>>> Answer: Wheeling-dealing, behind the scenes. Blackmail scopes. You send Apollo, we send Lunokhod. Now, shhh. Both superpowers happy, and the thirdworld is fooled. What fun. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Unfortunately for you, you have *zero* evidence to support your position... as always! You are just another fart in the wind... 
> >>>> I am stating the way the political world works, with no scruples that is. 
> >>>>> FAITH, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks 
> >>>>> without knowledge, of things without parallel. 
> >>>> Wrong definition by some fool of an atheist. 
> >>>> Faith is what moves mountains, that is, does great and wonderful things, beyond the scope of the lying sneering parasites. 
> >>>>> --Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary" 
> >>>> Some fool, unworthy of the devil's attention. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> I have given 6 key facts as evidence, repeated below 
> >>>> 1. The deep footprint on the surface, just as it would be for a 200 lb-er on planet Earth. 
> >>>> 2. The cheerfully waving US flag. 
> >>>> 3. The angle at which the astronauts stood, showing that they really weighed 200lb. Had they weighed 30 or so their backs would be straight. 
> >>>> 4. Shadows going all over the place. 
> >>>> 5. The great photo of one astronaut, very clear, absolutely frontal, now who took that? The other one is shown on the screen, but he is not taking any photo of the man. 
> >>>> 6. The cleanly resting legs of the lunar module. If the ground was that soft to make such a footprint, surely the blast would have left a different impact, blowing soil away, or the legs should have sunk i9n deeper like the footprint. 
> >>>> (I neglect the stars stuff that should have come up on the films,) 
> >>> Read the links, dimbulb... 
> >>> 
> >>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html 
> >> 
> >> Won't bother. 
> > 
> > Of course not. Idiots with idiotic "facts" can't be bothered with real 
> > facts. 
> > 
> >
> Again, Banjo is so similar to Plutonium. Pluto considered himself above 
> answering a trivial Ohm's Law question, and Banjo can't be bothered to 
> check a link which disproves the "evidence" Banjo claims disproves the 
> moon landing. 

Saw lots of such links, over the years, found nothing convincing.  If anything they solidified the conspiracy theories.
> 
> Yet Pluto and Banjo keep getting into kO0kfights when they should be 
> good buddies...

Archie and Moroney get into kookfights. I avoid both of them, but when they do respond I do not mind responding out of politeness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →

csiph-web

When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?

Contents

#865692

#865690

#865695

#865698

#866416

#865677

#865691

#865696

#865699

#865709

#865710

#865715

#865721

#865722

#865724

#865726

#865728

#865735

#865742

#865753