Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #829542 > unrolled thread
| Started by | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-08-03 18:24 -0500 |
| Last post | 2021-08-12 02:52 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 100 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-03 18:24 -0500
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-03 17:16 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:26 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 01:50 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:39 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:52 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 19:00 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 00:48 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 06:53 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 09:18 -0500
Re: Why??? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:30 -0500
Re: Why??? Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:09 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:44 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 12:01 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 12:10 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 12:28 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:00 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 15:18 -0500
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-04 13:23 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:54 -0700
Re: Why??? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-08-04 17:07 -0400
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 14:16 -0700
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-04 14:08 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:14 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 18:15 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:20 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 18:48 -0700
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-04 16:47 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 18:06 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 20:29 -0500
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:00 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:02 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:05 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:09 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:11 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 23:09 -0500
Re: Why??? Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 14:18 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:17 -0700
Re: Why??? Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:29 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:40 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 20:31 -0500
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 16:39 -0500
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 20:07 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 22:18 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 20:23 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 22:39 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 20:52 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 23:08 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:15 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 08:39 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 07:11 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-05 09:32 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 13:58 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 10:13 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 12:41 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 11:34 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 11:57 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 15:05 -0500
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-07 08:15 -0500
Re: Why??? Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 10:11 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 14:03 -0500
Re: Why??? Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-05 15:15 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 15:22 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 17:53 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 13:23 -0700
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 15:23 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 17:46 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 23:19 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 00:32 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:24 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:32 -0700
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 19:34 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-03 22:28 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 21:59 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 22:01 -0700
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 23:02 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:05 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 12:37 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 14:35 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:02 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 15:16 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 15:38 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:59 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 16:46 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 22:27 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 22:23 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 15:35 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 15:30 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-03 20:35 -0500
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-03 20:50 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 01:15 -0500
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 08:27 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 04:43 -0700
Why He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 02:52 -0700
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 08:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sem11c$9md$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #829848 |
On 8/6/2021 1:57 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Friday, August 6, 2021 at 10:42:08 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
>> On 8/6/2021 12:13 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 11:58:28 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
>>>
>>>> What my refusal to answer is simply
>>>> that I am here for my pleasure, not yours. That has nothing whatever to
>>>> do with "certain factions in academia."
>>>
>>> So, you are saying that the reason you won't answer my simple question (a question that you are more than qualified to answer) has nothing to do with my assertion that factions of academia have models the communally perceived validity of which pivots off the perceived validity of group-based superstitions the perceived validity of which can only be maintained by some type of subconscious taboo against revealing it as actually being false.
>>>
>>> Did I get this right?
>>>
>>> If not then kindly go away and refrain from responding to this question.
>>>
>>> If so, then let me ask you this. If what I was saying was actually true and your refusal to answer this simple question was actually a result of your subconscious wanting to maintain the perceived validity of a group-based superstitions that are actually false would we expect you to be consciously unaware thereof? And if the answer to this question is, as I suspect, no, then wouldn't this provide us keener insight to why you refuse to answer such a simple question (and, again, a question that you are more than qualified to answer)?
>>>
>>> James McGinn / Genius
>>>
>> Damn you're bossy.
>>
>> It appears to me, a mere pedestrian in this world, that the questions
>> you are issuing now directed at me are the consequence of some emotional
>> turmoil in your life rather than, as you appear to me to have attempted
>> to couch the questions, someone actually seeking knowledge.
>>
>> I am expert in very little. My life and work history, not well known to
>> the general public, satisfy any need for recognition I may have, and I
>> certainly do not need validation by you. If I had a need for validation
>> I would quite probably have used the name I was given at birth to assure
>> that I would be properly recognized. As matters stand, I have
>> contributed more than I have consumed, and only those I deem worthy of
>> the charge will eventually judge my performance.
>>
>> In the end, it doesn't matter how much you splash and splatter, you're
>> only a ducky after all.
>>
>> <https://crayongirllinz.wordpress.com/2015/01/08/throwbackthursday-little-ducky-duddle/>
>
> Your just confirming that I know the answer to the question and are willing to go to considerable lengths to not answer it, just like the other goons here on this forum.
>
> Thank you for your participation.
>
> James McGinn / Genius
>
QuaCK quaCk QUAcK....
Little Ducky Duddle
Went wading in a puddle
Went wading in a puddle quite small
Said he “It doesn’t matter
“How much I splash and splatter
“I’m only a ducky after all.”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 10:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <863c863c-2039-477c-8a11-e03844023bffn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829754 |
On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 9:39:16 AM UTC-4, whodat wrote: > On 8/4/2021 11:15 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:08:12 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >> On 8/4/2021 10:52 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:39:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>>> On 8/4/2021 10:23 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:19:04 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You dingbats avoid details. I don't > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Another monstrous lie from Jim McGinn. You never provide details. Ever. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You are wallowing in your delusional ignorance... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> he learned these techniques from his dominating mother, he lived with > >>>>>> her 5 years ago, then they moved... [McFly is about 60] > >>>>> > >>>>> Somebody needs a diaper change. > >>>> So you're the one bringing the stink to this newsgroup... > >>>> > >>>> Thought so. > >>> > >>> So, uh . . . er . . . uh, is the boiling temperature of H2O higher or lower than ambient temperature at STP? Uh, I mean, uh . . . er, uh? > >>> > >>> James McGinn / Genius > >> Not my gig, McGinn, it is yours to discuss, but you do not. Still > >> bringing the stink into this newsgroup? Still not answering questions? > >> > >> Sigh. > > > > Not your gig? That's your answer? Really? > > > > Why do you come here? > 1_ Unlike you, I answer pertinent questions. 2) From time to time I > actually discuss physics. 3) Yes, that's my answer, states of water is > not my gig. 4) I am here for my pleasure, not yours. 5) How much alcohol > do you consume? That does seem to be you gig. does any physicist or cosmologist think it wise to entirely disable nuclear weapons before the launch of hubble two (jw space telescope)? tiz possible a big problem with an easy solution daniel super genius gre 2380/2400
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 14:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <in2r0oFhs00U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829758 |
On 8/5/2021 12:11 PM, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: > On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 9:39:16 AM UTC-4, whodat wrote: >> On 8/4/2021 11:15 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:08:12 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>> On 8/4/2021 10:52 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:39:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:23 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:19:04 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You dingbats avoid details. I don't >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Another monstrous lie from Jim McGinn. You never provide details. Ever. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are wallowing in your delusional ignorance... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> he learned these techniques from his dominating mother, he lived with >>>>>>>> her 5 years ago, then they moved... [McFly is about 60] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Somebody needs a diaper change. >>>>>> So you're the one bringing the stink to this newsgroup... >>>>>> >>>>>> Thought so. >>>>> >>>>> So, uh . . . er . . . uh, is the boiling temperature of H2O higher or lower than ambient temperature at STP? Uh, I mean, uh . . . er, uh? >>>>> >>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>> Not my gig, McGinn, it is yours to discuss, but you do not. Still >>>> bringing the stink into this newsgroup? Still not answering questions? >>>> >>>> Sigh. >>> >>> Not your gig? That's your answer? Really? >>> >>> Why do you come here? >> 1_ Unlike you, I answer pertinent questions. 2) From time to time I >> actually discuss physics. 3) Yes, that's my answer, states of water is >> not my gig. 4) I am here for my pleasure, not yours. 5) How much alcohol >> do you consume? That does seem to be you gig. > > does any physicist or cosmologist think it wise > to entirely disable nuclear weapons before > the launch of hubble two (jw space telescope)? > tiz possible a big problem with an easy solution > daniel super genius gre 2380/2400 How would I (or anyone else for that matter) know what "any physicist or cosmologist" thinks? This answer would be true even if I were a member of either classification. When in a science newsgroup one needs to be specific and accurate. Sloppy rhetoric is only acceptable to cranks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 12:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e77cd875-a266-4f86-9457-02458fc7a0f1n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829768 |
On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 3:03:58 PM UTC-4, whodat wrote: > On 8/5/2021 12:11 PM, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: > > On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 9:39:16 AM UTC-4, whodat wrote: > >> On 8/4/2021 11:15 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:08:12 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>>> On 8/4/2021 10:52 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:39:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:23 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:19:04 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You dingbats avoid details. I don't > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Another monstrous lie from Jim McGinn. You never provide details. Ever. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You are wallowing in your delusional ignorance... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> he learned these techniques from his dominating mother, he lived with > >>>>>>>> her 5 years ago, then they moved... [McFly is about 60] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Somebody needs a diaper change. > >>>>>> So you're the one bringing the stink to this newsgroup... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thought so. > >>>>> > >>>>> So, uh . . . er . . . uh, is the boiling temperature of H2O higher or lower than ambient temperature at STP? Uh, I mean, uh . . . er, uh? > >>>>> > >>>>> James McGinn / Genius > >>>> Not my gig, McGinn, it is yours to discuss, but you do not. Still > >>>> bringing the stink into this newsgroup? Still not answering questions? > >>>> > >>>> Sigh. > >>> > >>> Not your gig? That's your answer? Really? > >>> > >>> Why do you come here? > >> 1_ Unlike you, I answer pertinent questions. 2) From time to time I > >> actually discuss physics. 3) Yes, that's my answer, states of water is > >> not my gig. 4) I am here for my pleasure, not yours. 5) How much alcohol > >> do you consume? That does seem to be you gig. > > > > does any physicist or cosmologist think it wise > > to entirely disable nuclear weapons before > > the launch of hubble two (jw space telescope)? > > tiz possible a big problem with an easy solution > > daniel super genius gre 2380/2400 > How would I (or anyone else for that matter) know what "any physicist > or cosmologist" thinks? This answer would be true even if I were a > member of either classification. When in a science newsgroup one > needs to be specific and accurate. Sloppy rhetoric is only acceptable to > cranks. i spotted a partial response to my output good thats a beginning what i am saying about hubble two (james webb space telescope) is that the universe may be larger than just the four trillion presently visible galaxies there may be "peekaboo" games as a possibility i have some evidence about hubble one while developing a program for universal truth in san diego three of the dead pilots of 911 lived on my street is what i am saying about peekaboo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 15:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sehgtd$l5p$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #829770 |
On 8/5/2021 2:24 PM, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: > On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 3:03:58 PM UTC-4, whodat wrote: >> On 8/5/2021 12:11 PM, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 9:39:16 AM UTC-4, whodat wrote: >>>> On 8/4/2021 11:15 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:08:12 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:52 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:39:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:23 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:19:04 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You dingbats avoid details. I don't >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Another monstrous lie from Jim McGinn. You never provide details. Ever. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are wallowing in your delusional ignorance... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> he learned these techniques from his dominating mother, he lived with >>>>>>>>>> her 5 years ago, then they moved... [McFly is about 60] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Somebody needs a diaper change. >>>>>>>> So you're the one bringing the stink to this newsgroup... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thought so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, uh . . . er . . . uh, is the boiling temperature of H2O higher or lower than ambient temperature at STP? Uh, I mean, uh . . . er, uh? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>>>> Not my gig, McGinn, it is yours to discuss, but you do not. Still >>>>>> bringing the stink into this newsgroup? Still not answering questions? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sigh. >>>>> >>>>> Not your gig? That's your answer? Really? >>>>> >>>>> Why do you come here? >>>> 1_ Unlike you, I answer pertinent questions. 2) From time to time I >>>> actually discuss physics. 3) Yes, that's my answer, states of water is >>>> not my gig. 4) I am here for my pleasure, not yours. 5) How much alcohol >>>> do you consume? That does seem to be you gig. >>> >>> does any physicist or cosmologist think it wise >>> to entirely disable nuclear weapons before >>> the launch of hubble two (jw space telescope)? >>> tiz possible a big problem with an easy solution >>> daniel super genius gre 2380/2400 >> How would I (or anyone else for that matter) know what "any physicist >> or cosmologist" thinks? This answer would be true even if I were a >> member of either classification. When in a science newsgroup one >> needs to be specific and accurate. Sloppy rhetoric is only acceptable to >> cranks. > > i spotted a partial response to my output > good thats a beginning > > what i am saying about hubble two (james webb space telescope) > is that the universe may be larger than just > the four trillion presently visible galaxies > > there may be "peekaboo" games as a possibility > i have some evidence about hubble one > while developing a program for universal truth in san diego > three of the dead pilots of 911 lived on my street > > is what i am saying about peekaboo > there is a lot more to peekaboo than you know!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 15:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <in2vk1FiqbdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829770 |
On 8/5/2021 2:24 PM, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: > On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 3:03:58 PM UTC-4, whodat wrote: >> On 8/5/2021 12:11 PM, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 9:39:16 AM UTC-4, whodat wrote: >>>> On 8/4/2021 11:15 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:08:12 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:52 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:39:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:23 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:19:04 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You dingbats avoid details. I don't >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Another monstrous lie from Jim McGinn. You never provide details. Ever. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are wallowing in your delusional ignorance... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> he learned these techniques from his dominating mother, he lived with >>>>>>>>>> her 5 years ago, then they moved... [McFly is about 60] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Somebody needs a diaper change. >>>>>>>> So you're the one bringing the stink to this newsgroup... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thought so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, uh . . . er . . . uh, is the boiling temperature of H2O higher or lower than ambient temperature at STP? Uh, I mean, uh . . . er, uh? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>>>> Not my gig, McGinn, it is yours to discuss, but you do not. Still >>>>>> bringing the stink into this newsgroup? Still not answering questions? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sigh. >>>>> >>>>> Not your gig? That's your answer? Really? >>>>> >>>>> Why do you come here? >>>> 1_ Unlike you, I answer pertinent questions. 2) From time to time I >>>> actually discuss physics. 3) Yes, that's my answer, states of water is >>>> not my gig. 4) I am here for my pleasure, not yours. 5) How much alcohol >>>> do you consume? That does seem to be you gig. >>> >>> does any physicist or cosmologist think it wise >>> to entirely disable nuclear weapons before >>> the launch of hubble two (jw space telescope)? >>> tiz possible a big problem with an easy solution >>> daniel super genius gre 2380/2400 >> How would I (or anyone else for that matter) know what "any physicist >> or cosmologist" thinks? This answer would be true even if I were a >> member of either classification. When in a science newsgroup one >> needs to be specific and accurate. Sloppy rhetoric is only acceptable to >> cranks. > > i spotted a partial response to my output > good thats a beginning > > what i am saying about hubble two (james webb space telescope) > is that the universe may be larger than just > the four trillion presently visible galaxies I'll credit you with saying "larger" rather than infinite, a case that we cannot demonstrate despite the fact that on such a point crank Banerjee of sci.physics.crankfame agrees with Einstein. See Einstein's book "Relativity" 15th Edition page 105. Einstein, precisely like Banerjee, gave anecdotal reasoning for his view on this topic. In this case I agree with you that the universe, as far as we are able to see, is larger than previously believed. I have no sense of what the maximum possible size might be, and as was famously said, "frankly my dear I don't give a damn." I reply to you while not giving McGee that courtesy because speculating about this topic amuses me to some extent, although not very much. > there may be "peekaboo" games as a possibility > i have some evidence about hubble one > while developing a program for universal truth in san diego "Universal truth" is much the same as infinity, an idea with usefulness in limited applications but impractical in the general case. > three of the dead pilots of 911 lived on my street Do you attribute anything to that possibility? Even if true, I don't. > is what i am saying about peekaboo So long as you're having a good time while not hurting anyone...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 17:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <df1abae9-cc1f-418d-9663-b518724fd69an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829773 |
- flush - Whodumbo mentions the supreme bungler Einstein and myself in the same breath. What insolence!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 13:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <04d0d9d5-12b7-4a59-b791-4fcedaf692afn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829770 |
On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 12:24:18 PM UTC-7, pehou...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 3:03:58 PM UTC-4, whodat wrote: > > On 8/5/2021 12:11 PM, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: > > > On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 9:39:16 AM UTC-4, whodat wrote: > > >> On 8/4/2021 11:15 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > > >>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:08:12 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > >>>> On 8/4/2021 10:52 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > > >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:39:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > >>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:23 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:19:04 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> You dingbats avoid details. I don't > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Another monstrous lie from Jim McGinn. You never provide details. Ever. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> You are wallowing in your delusional ignorance... > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> he learned these techniques from his dominating mother, he lived with > > >>>>>>>> her 5 years ago, then they moved... [McFly is about 60] > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Somebody needs a diaper change. > > >>>>>> So you're the one bringing the stink to this newsgroup... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thought so. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> So, uh . . . er . . . uh, is the boiling temperature of H2O higher or lower than ambient temperature at STP? Uh, I mean, uh . . . er, uh? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> James McGinn / Genius > > >>>> Not my gig, McGinn, it is yours to discuss, but you do not. Still > > >>>> bringing the stink into this newsgroup? Still not answering questions? > > >>>> > > >>>> Sigh. > > >>> > > >>> Not your gig? That's your answer? Really? > > >>> > > >>> Why do you come here? > > >> 1_ Unlike you, I answer pertinent questions. 2) From time to time I > > >> actually discuss physics. 3) Yes, that's my answer, states of water is > > >> not my gig. 4) I am here for my pleasure, not yours. 5) How much alcohol > > >> do you consume? That does seem to be you gig. > > > > > > does any physicist or cosmologist think it wise > > > to entirely disable nuclear weapons before > > > the launch of hubble two (jw space telescope)? > > > tiz possible a big problem with an easy solution > > > daniel super genius gre 2380/2400 > > How would I (or anyone else for that matter) know what "any physicist > > or cosmologist" thinks? This answer would be true even if I were a > > member of either classification. When in a science newsgroup one > > needs to be specific and accurate. Sloppy rhetoric is only acceptable to > > cranks. > i spotted a partial response to my output > good thats a beginning > > what i am saying about hubble two (james webb space telescope) > is that the universe may be larger than just > the four trillion presently visible galaxies Hubble and Webb were 2 different people, so the Webb telescope will never be called Hubble 2. > > there may be "peekaboo" games as a possibility > i have some evidence about hubble one > while developing a program for universal truth in san diego > three of the dead pilots of 911 lived on my street Actually, they lived in La Mesa, a suburb of San Diego...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 12:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9hqtth-q7o8.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #829768 |
whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > On 8/5/2021 12:11 PM, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: <snip> >> does any physicist or cosmologist think it wise >> to entirely disable nuclear weapons before >> the launch of hubble two (jw space telescope)? >> tiz possible a big problem with an easy solution >> daniel super genius gre 2380/2400 > > How would I (or anyone else for that matter) know what "any physicist > or cosmologist" thinks? This answer would be true even if I were a > member of either classification. When in a science newsgroup one > needs to be specific and accurate. Sloppy rhetoric is only acceptable to > cranks. Also, WTF does Hubble have to do with nuclear weapons?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 15:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <in2vmlFiqbdU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829771 |
On 8/5/2021 2:24 PM, Jim Pennino wrote: > whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: >> On 8/5/2021 12:11 PM, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: > > <snip> > >>> does any physicist or cosmologist think it wise >>> to entirely disable nuclear weapons before >>> the launch of hubble two (jw space telescope)? >>> tiz possible a big problem with an easy solution >>> daniel super genius gre 2380/2400 >> >> How would I (or anyone else for that matter) know what "any physicist >> or cosmologist" thinks? This answer would be true even if I were a >> member of either classification. When in a science newsgroup one >> needs to be specific and accurate. Sloppy rhetoric is only acceptable to >> cranks. > > Also, WTF does Hubble have to do with nuclear weapons? Possibly perfect sense to a disordered mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-05 17:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eed80123-8930-41b8-ab4e-114265bea4aan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829754 |
On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 23:39:16 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > On 8/4/2021 11:15 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:08:12 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >> On 8/4/2021 10:52 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:39:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>>> On 8/4/2021 10:23 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:19:04 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/4/2021 10:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You dingbats avoid details. I don't > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Another monstrous lie from Jim McGinn. You never provide details. Ever. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You are wallowing in your delusional ignorance... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> he learned these techniques from his dominating mother, he lived with > >>>>>> her 5 years ago, then they moved... [McFly is about 60] > >>>>> > >>>>> Somebody needs a diaper change. > >>>> So you're the one bringing the stink to this newsgroup... > >>>> > >>>> Thought so. > >>> > >>> So, uh . . . er . . . uh, is the boiling temperature of H2O higher or lower than ambient temperature at STP? Uh, I mean, uh . . . er, uh? > >>> > >>> James McGinn / Genius > >> Not my gig, McGinn, it is yours to discuss, but you do not. Still > >> bringing the stink into this newsgroup? Still not answering questions? > >> > >> Sigh. > > > > Not your gig? That's your answer? Really? > > > > Why do you come here? > 1_ Unlike you, I answer pertinent questions. You invariably make an ass of yourself. Being a dumbo what else can you do, whodumbo. 2) From time to time I > actually discuss physics. You have no clue about physics. 3) Yes, that's my answer, states of water is > not my gig. Nor anything else. 4) I am here for my pleasure, not yours. You provide some pleasure, unintentionally. 5) How much alcohol > do you consume? That does seem to be you gig.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 23:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sefosu$5v2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #829711 |
On 8/4/2021 10:52 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:39:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 8/4/2021 10:23 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:19:04 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 8/4/2021 10:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You dingbats avoid details. I don't >>>>> >>>>> Another monstrous lie from Jim McGinn. You never provide details. Ever. >>>>> >>>>> You are wallowing in your delusional ignorance... >>>>> >>>> he learned these techniques from his dominating mother, he lived with >>>> her 5 years ago, then they moved... [McFly is about 60] >>> >>> Somebody needs a diaper change. >> So you're the one bringing the stink to this newsgroup... >> >> Thought so. > > So, duh, . er . . . duh, is the boiling temperature of H2O higher or lower than ambient temperature at STP? dUh, I mean, duh . . . er, duh? > > James McGinn / Pretend Scientist > McGinn is only here to insult people, it is what he does in other groups. He really does not know anything at all, McFly just makes stuff up to aggravate people. Very strong sign of mental illness(s) and self medication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 21:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <117ab844-d9e0-4556-a1c2-bc8c02320bcan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829724 |
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:19:58 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > On 8/4/2021 10:52 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:39:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >> On 8/4/2021 10:23 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 8:19:04 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > >>>> On 8/4/2021 10:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> You dingbats avoid details. I don't > >>>>> > >>>>> Another monstrous lie from Jim McGinn. You never provide details. Ever. > >>>>> > >>>>> You are wallowing in your delusional ignorance... > >>>>> > >>>> he learned these techniques from his dominating mother, he lived with > >>>> her 5 years ago, then they moved... [McFly is about 60] > >>> > >>> Somebody needs a diaper change. > >> So you're the one bringing the stink to this newsgroup... > >> > >> Thought so. > > > > So, duh, . er . . . duh, is the boiling temperature of H2O higher or lower than ambient temperature at STP? dUh, I mean, duh . . . er, duh? > > > > James McGinn / Pretend Scientist > > > > McGinn is only here to insult people, > it is what he does in other groups. > He really does not know anything at all, > McFly just makes stuff up to aggravate people. > Very strong sign of mental illness(s) and self medication Diaper rash?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 00:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <imun36Fm1acU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829545 |
On 8/3/2021 8:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >> this newsgroup? > > Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh > > Sergio? > > Yourself? > > Seriously? "just for grins #1" and #2. > Uh. > > Er. > > James McGinn / Genius > No clarity on this claim of yours either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-03 18:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a89ac011-d408-45cf-ad17-63e165d71d29n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829542 |
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > this newsgroup? Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. Why why why he's a dumbo? Bad bad bad is whodumbo. Sad sad sad is whodumbo. Such such such is whodumbo.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-03 18:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <19e93d6b-b539-4b03-8e70-4d8bc50ff2den@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829549 |
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > > this newsgroup? > Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. > Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. > > Why why why he's a dumbo? > Bad bad bad is whodumbo. > Sad sad sad is whodumbo. > Such such such is whodumbo. They are all rather dimwitted, boring. Aren't they.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-03 19:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7c934ac9-3c19-4901-a79e-5e07ddd1342dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829553 |
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 11:32:32 UTC+10, James McGinn wrote: > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > > > this newsgroup? > > Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. > > Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. > > > > Why why why he's a dumbo? > > Bad bad bad is whodumbo. > > Sad sad sad is whodumbo. > > Such such such is whodumbo. > They are all rather dimwitted, boring. Aren't they. Of course. One has to turn them to what they are not, such as Wonderland creatures, to get some fun outa them. What is genuinely funny is that they think they are smart. Sad to think, reps of these clowns run the establishments.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-03 22:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sed1g7$575$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #829570 |
On 8/3/2021 9:34 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 11:32:32 UTC+10, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote:
>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in
>>>> this newsgroup?
>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo.
>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose.
>>>
>>> Why why why he's a dumbo?
>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo.
>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo.
>>> Such such such is whodumbo.
>> They are all rather dimwitted, boring. Aren't they.
>
> Of course. One has to turn them to what they are not, such as Wonderland creatures, to get some fun outa them.
> What is genuinely funny is that they think they are smart.
> Sad to think, reps of these clowns run the establishments.
>
poor LowIQ James McGinn,
a bungler selling Dehydrated Water Vapor
and looking for his lost Cold Steam,
all dreams of the Pretend Scientist James McGinn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-03 21:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e088cd48-301f-4b4e-bfd3-843827c20220n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829573 |
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 13:28:13 UTC+10, Sergio wrote: > On 8/3/2021 9:34 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 11:32:32 UTC+10, James McGinn wrote: > >> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > >>>> this newsgroup? > >>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. > >>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. > >>> > >>> Why why why he's a dumbo? > >>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. > >>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. > >>> Such such such is whodumbo. > >> They are all rather dimwitted, boring. Aren't they. > > > > Of course. One has to turn them to what they are not, such as Wonderland creatures, to get some fun outa them. > > What is genuinely funny is that they think they are smart. > > Sad to think, reps of these clowns run the establishments. > > > poor LowIQ James McGinn, > a bungler selling Dehydrated Water Vapor > and looking for his lost Cold Steam, > all dreams of the Pretend Scientist James McGinn There have been so many brilliant Scot inventors. McGinn sound Scottish. He has a great tradition to uphold, then. At any rate he is getting a lot of attention here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-03 22:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7438b283-8a71-4747-99cf-69c02bff6561n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829575 |
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 9:59:37 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > There have been so many brilliant Scot inventors. McGinn sound Scottish. He has a great tradition to uphold, then. At any rate he is getting a lot of attention here. Yes, he does... just like you do... and it is ALL negative! Between the 2 of you you have the intelligence of a couple of ping-pong balls...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web