Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #829542 > unrolled thread
| Started by | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-08-03 18:24 -0500 |
| Last post | 2021-08-12 02:52 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 100 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-03 18:24 -0500
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-03 17:16 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:26 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 01:50 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:39 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:52 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 19:00 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 00:48 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 06:53 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 09:18 -0500
Re: Why??? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:30 -0500
Re: Why??? Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:09 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:44 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 12:01 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 12:10 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 12:28 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:00 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 15:18 -0500
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-04 13:23 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:54 -0700
Re: Why??? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-08-04 17:07 -0400
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 14:16 -0700
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-04 14:08 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:14 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 18:15 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:20 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 18:48 -0700
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-04 16:47 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 18:06 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 20:29 -0500
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:00 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:02 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:05 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:09 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:11 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 23:09 -0500
Re: Why??? Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 14:18 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:17 -0700
Re: Why??? Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:29 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:40 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 20:31 -0500
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 16:39 -0500
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 20:07 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 22:18 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 20:23 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 22:39 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 20:52 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 23:08 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:15 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 08:39 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 07:11 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-05 09:32 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 13:58 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 10:13 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 12:41 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 11:34 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 11:57 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 15:05 -0500
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-07 08:15 -0500
Re: Why??? Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 10:11 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 14:03 -0500
Re: Why??? Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-05 15:15 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 15:22 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 17:53 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 13:23 -0700
Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 15:23 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 17:46 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 23:19 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 00:32 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:24 -0700
Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:32 -0700
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 19:34 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-03 22:28 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 21:59 -0700
Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 22:01 -0700
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 23:02 -0700
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:05 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 12:37 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 14:35 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:02 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 15:16 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 15:38 -0500
Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:59 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 16:46 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 22:27 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 22:23 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 15:35 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 15:30 -0700
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-03 20:35 -0500
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-03 20:50 -0500
Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 01:15 -0500
Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 08:27 -0500
Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 04:43 -0700
Why He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 02:52 -0700
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-03 23:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <071d776b-9678-484f-8cdf-c99dbdca0b54n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829576 |
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:02:00 UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 9:59:37 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > > > There have been so many brilliant Scot inventors. McGinn sound Scottish. He has a great tradition to uphold, then. At any rate he is getting a lot of attention here. > Yes, he does... just like you do... and it is ALL negative! Between the 2 of you you have the intelligence of a couple of ping-pong balls... Quiet, dormouse. Don't squeak. If you must, do so respectfully.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 10:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <be0fe4f2-1569-454b-9646-8fe17f2cc68dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829549 |
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > > this newsgroup? > Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. > Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. > > Why why why he's a dumbo? > Bad bad bad is whodumbo. > Sad sad sad is whodumbo. > Such such such is whodumbo. These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. James McGinn / Genius
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 12:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <in01i9F5pgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829616 |
On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >>> this newsgroup? >> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. >> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. >> >> Why why why he's a dumbo? >> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. >> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. >> Such such such is whodumbo. > > These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. > > Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. > > The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. > > James McGinn / Genius > Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks in sci.physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <51358a9b-6f95-40ca-ac28-ab559ec881a3n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829619 |
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > >>> this newsgroup? > >> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. > >> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. > >> > >> Why why why he's a dumbo? > >> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. > >> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. > >> Such such such is whodumbo. > > > > These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. > > > > Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. > > > > The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. > > > > James McGinn / Genius > > > Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or > cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. > > The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks > in sci.physics. None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 14:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <in08fkF1innU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829622 |
On 8/4/2021 12:53 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >>>>> this newsgroup? >>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. >>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. >>>> >>>> Why why why he's a dumbo? >>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. >>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. >>>> Such such such is whodumbo. >>> >>> These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. >>> >>> Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. >>> >>> The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. >>> >>> James McGinn / Genius >>> >> Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or >> cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. >> >> The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks >> in sci.physics. > > None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers. I have to wonder what you get out of these unsubstantiated personal insults. You sound so much like the typical homeless street bum that it is hard to get past that image. Did you graduate from high school? Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 13:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <594fb58e-03d8-4815-857e-8d28fa72b3f6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829631 |
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 8/4/2021 12:53 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >> On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > >>>>> this newsgroup? > >>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. > >>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. > >>>> > >>>> Why why why he's a dumbo? > >>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. > >>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. > >>>> Such such such is whodumbo. > >>> > >>> These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. > >>> > >>> Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. > >>> > >>> The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. > >>> > >>> James McGinn / Genius > >>> > >> Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or > >> cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. > >> > >> The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks > >> in sci.physics. > > > > None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers. > I have to wonder what you get out of these unsubstantiated personal > insults. You sound so much like the typical homeless street bum that > it is hard to get past that image. Did you graduate from high school? > > Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your > caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes? I imagine it must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so completely incapable of explaining how and why. Maybe science ain't your thing. James McGinn / Genius
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 15:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <seesig$v6t$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #829633 |
On 8/4/2021 3:02 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 8/4/2021 12:53 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>> On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >>>>>>> this newsgroup? >>>>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. >>>>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why why why he's a dumbo? >>>>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. >>>>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. >>>>>> Such such such is whodumbo. >>>>> >>>>> These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. >>>>> >>>>> Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. >>>>> >>>>> The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. >>>>> >>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>>> >>>> Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or >>>> cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. >>>> >>>> The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks >>>> in sci.physics. >>> >>> None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers. >> I have to wonder what you get out of these unsubstantiated personal >> insults. You sound so much like the typical homeless street bum that >> it is hard to get past that image. Did you graduate from high school? >> >> Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your >> caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes? > > I imagine it must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so completely incapable of explaining how and why. > > Maybe science ain't your thing. > > James McGinn / Genius > you're projecting again, you do it all the time. self-confident dummie idiot coddled by TV and internet brain-dead
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 15:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <in0c5lF29asU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829634 |
On 8/4/2021 3:16 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 8/4/2021 3:02 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>> On 8/4/2021 12:53 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>> On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >>>>>>>> this newsgroup? >>>>>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. >>>>>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why why why he's a dumbo? >>>>>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. >>>>>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. >>>>>>> Such such such is whodumbo. >>>>>> >>>>>> These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. >>>>>> >>>>>> Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. >>>>>> >>>>>> The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. >>>>>> >>>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>>>> >>>>> Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or >>>>> cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. >>>>> >>>>> The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks >>>>> in sci.physics. >>>> >>>> None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers. >>> I have to wonder what you get out of these unsubstantiated personal >>> insults. You sound so much like the typical homeless street bum that >>> it is hard to get past that image. Did you graduate from high school? >>> >>> Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your >>> caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes? >> >> I imagine it must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so completely incapable of explaining how and why. >> >> Maybe science ain't your thing. >> >> James McGinn / Genius >> > > > you're projecting again, you do it all the time. > self-confident dummie > idiot coddled by TV and internet > brain-dead He displays classic alcoholism. I've had the misfortune of encountering his type before.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 13:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c6a501ae-a06f-42b2-bb7c-6128ffd035e8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829638 |
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 8/4/2021 3:16 PM, Sergio wrote: > > On 8/4/2021 3:02 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>> On 8/4/2021 12:53 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>>>> On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > >>>>>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > >>>>>>>> this newsgroup? > >>>>>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. > >>>>>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Why why why he's a dumbo? > >>>>>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. > >>>>>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. > >>>>>>> Such such such is whodumbo. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> James McGinn / Genius > >>>>>> > >>>>> Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or > >>>>> cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. > >>>>> > >>>>> The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks > >>>>> in sci.physics. > >>>> > >>>> None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers. > >>> I have to wonder what you get out of these unsubstantiated personal > >>> insults. You sound so much like the typical homeless street bum that > >>> it is hard to get past that image. Did you graduate from high school? > >>> > >>> Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your > >>> caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes? > >> > >> I imagine it must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so completely incapable of explaining how and why. > >> > >> Maybe science ain't your thing. > >> > >> James McGinn / Genius > >> > > > > > > you're projecting again, you do it all the time. > > self-confident dummie > > idiot coddled by TV and internet > > brain-dead > He displays classic alcoholism. I've had the misfortune of encountering > his type before. Your desperation is showing. James McGinn / Genius
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 16:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sef1rg$16a2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #829643 |
On 8/4/2021 3:59 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 8/4/2021 3:16 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 8/4/2021 3:02 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>> On 8/4/2021 12:53 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >>>>>>>>>> this newsgroup? >>>>>>>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. >>>>>>>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why why why he's a dumbo? >>>>>>>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. >>>>>>>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. >>>>>>>>> Such such such is whodumbo. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or >>>>>>> cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks >>>>>>> in sci.physics. >>>>>> >>>>>> None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers. >>>>> I have to wonder what you get out of these unsubstantiated personal >>>>> insults. You sound so much like the typical homeless street bum that >>>>> it is hard to get past that image. Did you graduate from high school? >>>>> >>>>> Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your >>>>> caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes? >>>> >>>> I imagine it must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so completely incapable of explaining how and why. >>>> >>>> Maybe science ain't your thing. >>>> >>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>> >>> >>> >>> you're projecting again, you do it all the time. >>> self-confident dummie >>> idiot coddled by TV and internet >>> brain-dead >> He displays classic alcoholism. I've had the misfortune of encountering >> his type before. > > Your desperation is showing. What is phase diagram of Everclear Jim ? > > James McGinn / Genius >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 22:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <in145vF6qm4U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829651 |
On 8/4/2021 4:46 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 8/4/2021 3:59 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>> On 8/4/2021 3:16 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 8/4/2021 3:02 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>> On 8/4/2021 12:53 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >>>>>>>>>>> this newsgroup? >>>>>>>>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. >>>>>>>>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why why why he's a dumbo? >>>>>>>>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. >>>>>>>>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. >>>>>>>>>> Such such such is whodumbo. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or >>>>>>>> cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks >>>>>>>> in sci.physics. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers. >>>>>> I have to wonder what you get out of these unsubstantiated personal >>>>>> insults. You sound so much like the typical homeless street bum that >>>>>> it is hard to get past that image. Did you graduate from high school? >>>>>> >>>>>> Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your >>>>>> caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes? >>>>> >>>>> I imagine it must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so completely incapable of explaining how and why. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe science ain't your thing. >>>>> >>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> you're projecting again, you do it all the time. >>>> self-confident dummie >>>> idiot coddled by TV and internet >>>> brain-dead >>> He displays classic alcoholism. I've had the misfortune of encountering >>> his type before. >> >> Your desperation is showing. > > > What is phase diagram of Everclear Jim ? He is unable to stay on topic let alone answer any questions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 22:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <in13tjF6qm4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829643 |
On 8/4/2021 3:59 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 8/4/2021 3:16 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 8/4/2021 3:02 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>> On 8/4/2021 12:53 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >>>>>>>>>> this newsgroup? >>>>>>>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. >>>>>>>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why why why he's a dumbo? >>>>>>>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. >>>>>>>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. >>>>>>>>> Such such such is whodumbo. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or >>>>>>> cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks >>>>>>> in sci.physics. >>>>>> >>>>>> None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers. >>>>> I have to wonder what you get out of these unsubstantiated personal >>>>> insults. You sound so much like the typical homeless street bum that >>>>> it is hard to get past that image. Did you graduate from high school? >>>>> >>>>> Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your >>>>> caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes? >>>> >>>> I imagine it must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so completely incapable of explaining how and why. >>>> >>>> Maybe science ain't your thing. >>>> >>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>> >>> >>> >>> you're projecting again, you do it all the time. >>> self-confident dummie >>> idiot coddled by TV and internet >>> brain-dead >> He displays classic alcoholism. I've had the misfortune of encountering >> his type before. > > Your desperation is showing. > > James McGinn / Genius Speak for yourself. I have nothing that could create a sense of desperation. You, on the other hand...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 15:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <in0c0uF29asU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829633 |
On 8/4/2021 3:02 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 8/4/2021 12:53 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:37:18 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>> On 8/4/2021 12:05 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: >>>>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >>>>>>> this newsgroup? >>>>>> Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. >>>>>> Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why why why he's a dumbo? >>>>>> Bad bad bad is whodumbo. >>>>>> Sad sad sad is whodumbo. >>>>>> Such such such is whodumbo. >>>>> >>>>> These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. >>>>> >>>>> Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. >>>>> >>>>> The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. >>>>> >>>>> James McGinn / Genius >>>>> >>>> Fool, there is no TV watching in my home. I have no TV antenna, or >>>> cable. The few minutes I spend here are too much time wasted. >>>> >>>> The worse of internet science, why that's you and the other cranks >>>> in sci.physics. >>> >>> None of you nitwits has an actual argument--ever!!! You are all brain-dead science believers. >> I have to wonder what you get out of these unsubstantiated personal >> insults. You sound so much like the typical homeless street bum that >> it is hard to get past that image. Did you graduate from high school? >> >> Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your >> caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes? > > I imagine it must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so completely incapable of explaining how and why. > > Maybe science ain't your thing. > > James McGinn / Genius It appears you are incapable of staying on topic. I asked, "Did you graduate from high school?" and you prove yourself incapable of answering. And also, "Did the other kids beat you up frequently? Is a significant part of your caloric intake alcohol? Is Arindam Banerjee one of your heroes?" For normal people, those are questions that are very easy to answer, but clearly you are incapable. So thanks for letting us know that you are incapable of normal discussion with adults, thus nobody needs to bother any further with you. But of course there is a touch of masochism in many people...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 15:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <360a2a02-f936-4d11-8f2a-9815013f13ccn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829616 |
On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 03:05:53 UTC+10, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:24:16 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 09:24:10 UTC+10, whodat wrote: > > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > > > this newsgroup? > > Cranks are more interesting than the dull dumbfucks like you, whodumbo. > > Try to be more like the March Hare. Or the Mad Hatter. Pour some tea over the dormouse Alsing's nose. > > > > Why why why he's a dumbo? > > Bad bad bad is whodumbo. > > Sad sad sad is whodumbo. > > Such such such is whodumbo. > These idiots are so coddled by TV and internet science that it is incomprehensible to them that anybody would suggest there are things that are either not well understood or even misunderstood by science. > > Media has produced a lot of self-confident dummies. Media has solidified lies. > > The whodats and moroneys struggle to pretend that their obedience is motivated by anything other than intellectual laziness. And they fail with every post. How true. > > James McGinn / Genius
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-03 20:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <secqsu$5nk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #829542 |
On 8/3/2021 6:24 PM, whodat wrote: > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > this newsgroup? I tried posting physics problems to solve, easy ones, but not many takers... need to try again. we could start a discussion on a few simple problems... add some insite... not too many here that know any physics, but it is great when you do know physics, you can explain how things work in many situations, and use it in real life to your advantage. And have no fear of how things work. No Magic needed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-03 20:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <secroc$d58$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #829542 |
On 8/3/2021 6:24 PM, whodat wrote: > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > this newsgroup? something about human nature, and the style of this newsgroup, which is equivalent to writing stuff on a chalkboard and walking away, then the next dude comes by. you see it with qAnon, and the WOKE peoples, echo chambers... Human to human communication is broken using the internet UA called sci.physics the ROS, river of S**t, and UA was a very smart guy, excellent with words, a chemist who knew physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 01:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <imupk2FmgtuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #829561 |
On 8/3/2021 8:50 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 8/3/2021 6:24 PM, whodat wrote: >> >> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >> this newsgroup? > > something about human nature, and the style of this newsgroup, which is > equivalent to writing stuff on a chalkboard and walking away, then the > next dude comes by. > > you see it with qAnon, and the WOKE peoples, echo chambers... > > Human to human communication is broken using the internet Given the current day applications of Usenet I must agree. But I hasten to add that while your statement contains a degree of truth, that truth is not universal because individual experiences that are available to underpin the idea are themselves not universal. I think I can probably find an exception, and it only requires one. > UA called sci.physics the ROS, river of S**t, and UA was a very smart > guy, excellent with words, a chemist who knew physics. UA was living walking proof that a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. As with many participants, his human nature was his downfall. I gladly will agree that UA knew *some* physics but I will not attempt define such limitations as existed. UA challenged some very basic precepts yet other than arguing strongly he was unable to support his personal (not completely unique) ideas to the point of publication in peer reviewed journal(s.) I hasten to add that an audit of any further work being performed on those precepts would show that nobody else has taken up his banner to further the ideas UA promoted. IMO it is unlikely that anyone ever will. Of course I can easily be proved wrong if indeed I am. Again, this is only an opinion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 08:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <see4kv$16ui$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #829584 |
On 8/4/2021 1:15 AM, whodat wrote: > On 8/3/2021 8:50 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 8/3/2021 6:24 PM, whodat wrote: >>> >>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in >>> this newsgroup? >> >> something about human nature, and the style of this newsgroup, which is >> equivalent to writing stuff on a chalkboard and walking away, then the >> next dude comes by. >> >> you see it with qAnon, and the WOKE peoples, echo chambers... >> >> Human to human communication is broken using the internet > > Given the current day applications of Usenet I must agree. But I hasten > to add that while your statement contains a degree of truth, that truth > is not universal because individual experiences that are available to > underpin the idea are themselves not universal. I think I can probably > find an exception, and it only requires one. agree, its like shades of gray, and dependent on many things. > >> UA called sci.physics the ROS, river of S**t, and UA was a very smart >> guy, excellent with words, a chemist who knew physics. > > UA was living walking proof that a little knowledge can be a dangerous > thing. As with many participants, his human nature was his downfall. I > gladly will agree that UA knew *some* physics but I will not attempt > define such limitations as existed. > > UA challenged some very basic precepts yet other than arguing strongly > he was unable to support his personal (not completely unique) ideas to > the point of publication in peer reviewed journal(s.) I hasten to add > that an audit of any further work being performed on those precepts > would show that nobody else has taken up his banner to further the ideas > UA promoted. IMO it is unlikely that anyone ever will. Of course I can > easily be proved wrong if indeed I am. Again, this is only an opinion. I was impressed by his use of English, one of my weaknesses.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-04 04:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f89f19e5-66fc-4a78-a451-8d64088a424cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829561 |
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 11:50:08 UTC+10, Sergio wrote: > On 8/3/2021 6:24 PM, whodat wrote: > > > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in > > this newsgroup? > something about human nature, and the style of this newsgroup, which is > equivalent to writing stuff on a chalkboard and walking away, then the > next dude comes by. > > you see it with qAnon, and the WOKE peoples, echo chambers... > > Human to human communication is broken using the internet > > UA called sci.physics the ROS, river of S**t, and UA was a very smart > guy, excellent with words, a chemist who knew physics. He was smart in the negative way, like Einstein et al. He ridiculed my invention of the HTN on the theoretical ground that it's realisation would upset the laws of thermodynamics, so it had to be flawed. At that time the HTN was not patented. Sooner all these pests die off, better for the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-12 02:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Why |
| Message-ID | <052ade41-7462-4037-aba5-107e91d7406bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829542 |
not?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web