Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #829542 > unrolled thread

Why???

Started bywhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
First post2021-08-03 18:24 -0500
Last post2021-08-12 02:52 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 100 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-03 18:24 -0500
    Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-03 17:16 -0700
      Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:26 -0700
      Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 01:50 -0700
    Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:13 -0700
      Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:30 -0700
        Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:39 -0700
          Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:52 -0700
            Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 19:00 -0700
        Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 00:48 -0500
        Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 06:53 -0700
          Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 09:18 -0500
          Re: Why??? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:30 -0500
          Re: Why??? Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:09 -0700
            Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:44 -0700
          Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 12:01 -0700
            Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 12:10 -0700
              Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 12:28 -0700
                Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:00 -0700
                  Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 15:18 -0500
                  Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-04 13:23 -0700
                    Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:54 -0700
                      Re: Why??? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-08-04 17:07 -0400
                        Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 14:16 -0700
                      Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-04 14:08 -0700
                        Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:14 -0700
                          Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 18:15 -0500
                            Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:20 -0700
                              Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 18:48 -0700
                          Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-04 16:47 -0700
                            Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 18:06 -0700
                              Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 20:29 -0500
                          Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:00 -0700
                            Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:02 -0700
                              Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:05 -0700
                                Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:09 -0700
                                  Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:11 -0700
                              Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 23:09 -0500
                      Re: Why??? Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 14:18 -0700
                        Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:17 -0700
                          Re: Why??? Andy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:29 -0700
                            Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 16:40 -0700
                              Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 20:31 -0500
                      Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 16:39 -0500
                      Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 20:07 -0700
                        Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 22:18 -0500
                          Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 20:23 -0700
                            Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 22:39 -0500
                              Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 20:52 -0700
                                Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 23:08 -0500
                                  Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:15 -0700
                                    Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 08:39 -0500
                                      Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 07:11 -0700
                                        Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-05 09:32 -0500
                                        Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 13:58 -0500
                                          Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 10:13 -0700
                                            Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 12:41 -0500
                                              Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 11:34 -0700
                                              Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 11:57 -0700
                                                Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 15:05 -0500
                                                Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-07 08:15 -0500
                                      Re: Why??? Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 10:11 -0700
                                        Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 14:03 -0500
                                          Re: Why??? Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 12:24 -0700
                                            Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-05 15:15 -0500
                                            Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 15:22 -0500
                                              Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 17:53 -0700
                                            Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 13:23 -0700
                                          Re: Why??? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-05 12:24 -0700
                                            Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-05 15:23 -0500
                                      Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-05 17:46 -0700
                                Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 23:19 -0500
                                  Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 21:32 -0700
      Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 00:32 -0500
    Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:24 -0700
      Re: Why??? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 18:32 -0700
        Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 19:34 -0700
          Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-03 22:28 -0500
            Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 21:59 -0700
              Re: Why??? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 22:01 -0700
                Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-03 23:02 -0700
      Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:05 -0700
        Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 12:37 -0500
          Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 10:53 -0700
            Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 14:35 -0500
              Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:02 -0700
                Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 15:16 -0500
                  Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 15:38 -0500
                    Re: Why??? Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 13:59 -0700
                      Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 16:46 -0500
                        Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 22:27 -0500
                      Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 22:23 -0500
                Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 15:35 -0500
        Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 15:30 -0700
    Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-03 20:35 -0500
    Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-03 20:50 -0500
      Re: Why??? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-04 01:15 -0500
        Re: Why??? Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-08-04 08:27 -0500
      Re: Why??? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 04:43 -0700
    Why He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 02:52 -0700

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →


#829542 — Why???

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2021-08-03 18:24 -0500
SubjectWhy???
Message-ID<imu1glFhsr5U2@mid.individual.net>
Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in
this newsgroup?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#829544

FromJim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date2021-08-03 17:16 -0700
Message-ID<js2pth-civ4.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to#829542
whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote:
> 
> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in
> this newsgroup?

Ignoring them is pointless as they just keep posting, so we may as well
have some fun at the expense of the idiots, cranks, and delusionals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829550

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-03 18:26 -0700
Message-ID<81955655-4596-4b9d-a57b-c7dd58108343n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829544
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 5:31:09 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
> whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: 
> > 
> > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> > this newsgroup?
> Ignoring them is pointless as they just keep posting, so we may as well 
> have some fun at the expense of the idiots, cranks, and delusionals.

LOL.  Maybe if you morons didn't present such weak ass arguments, you know, like "It's in a textbook.  It's in a library."' I mean, how dumb would your audience have to be to not realize that these aren't desperate arguments..

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829734

FromSolving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-05 01:50 -0700
Message-ID<4b23e2cb-67c4-4b94-9d26-3c6fe040e605n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829544
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 5:31:09 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
> whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: 
> > 
> > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> > this newsgroup?
> Ignoring them is pointless as they just keep posting, so we may as well 
> have some fun at the expense of the idiots, cranks, and delusionals.

Are you having fun yet?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829545

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-03 18:13 -0700
Message-ID<0c5708b7-0d43-45d6-9c92-14481dfcda3an@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829542
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> this newsgroup?

Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content?  Uh, er . . . uh

Sergio?

Yourself?  

Seriously?

Uh.

Er.

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829552

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-03 18:30 -0700
Message-ID<ce7d7eac-dbcf-4ae6-a3b0-fb17fcbd0863n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829545
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:13:36 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: 

> > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> > this newsgroup?

> Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh 
> 
> Sergio? 
> 
> Yourself? 
> 
> Seriously? 
> 
> Uh. 
> 
> Er. 

Jim, you ignoramus, NO ONE here ever comes up with legitimate original content, since none of us are qualified to do so in physics. You and others, however, absolutely DO come up with original content, but it is as worthless as tits on a bullfrog since it is not confirmed with any evidence whatsoever!

You could change all this, of course, with the aforementioned evidence, but that would be impossible since you don't have any evidence,  and also because don't have the brains given to a watermelon.

In a perfect world, people would come to this forum with questions about physics, and some knowledgeable folks would give them answers or direct them to knowledgeable web pages that provide answers... but for a long time this forum has been dominate by kooks and cranks who think they are smarter than Einstein and are actually proud of their ignorance... and you are a PERFECT example of such kooks and cranks!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829556

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-03 18:39 -0700
Message-ID<42eefc14-ea0a-47eb-88ff-28286a970541n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829552
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:30:43 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:13:36 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: 
> 
> > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> > > this newsgroup? 
> 
> > Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh 
> > 
> > Sergio? 
> > 
> > Yourself? 
> > 
> > Seriously? 
> > 
> > Uh. 
> > 
> > Er.
> Jim, you ignoramus, NO ONE here ever comes up with legitimate original content, since none of us are qualified to do so in physics. You and others, however, absolutely DO come up with original content, but it is as worthless as tits on a bullfrog since it is not confirmed with any evidence whatsoever! 
> 
> You could change all this, of course, with the aforementioned evidence, but that would be impossible since you don't have any evidence, and also because don't have the brains given to a watermelon. 
> 
> In a perfect world, people would come to this forum with questions about physics, and some knowledgeable folks would give them answers or direct them to knowledgeable web pages that provide answers... but for a long time this forum has been dominate by kooks and cranks who think they are smarter than Einstein and are actually proud of their ignorance... and you are a PERFECT example of such kooks and cranks!

i think you all should keep your traps shut so you don't further embarrass yourselves.

James McGinn

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829562

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-03 18:52 -0700
Message-ID<9bc05321-49b0-4694-aaea-e601cb4b8403n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829556
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:39:17 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:30:43 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:13:36 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: 
> > 
> > > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> > > > this newsgroup? 
> > 
> > > Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh 
> > > 
> > > Sergio? 
> > > 
> > > Yourself? 
> > > 
> > > Seriously? 
> > > 
> > > Uh. 
> > > 
> > > Er. 
> > Jim, you ignoramus, NO ONE here ever comes up with legitimate original content, since none of us are qualified to do so in physics. You and others, however, absolutely DO come up with original content, but it is as worthless as tits on a bullfrog since it is not confirmed with any evidence whatsoever! 
> > 
> > You could change all this, of course, with the aforementioned evidence, but that would be impossible since you don't have any evidence, and also because don't have the brains given to a watermelon. 
> > 
> > In a perfect world, people would come to this forum with questions about physics, and some knowledgeable folks would give them answers or direct them to knowledgeable web pages that provide answers... but for a long time this forum has been dominate by kooks and cranks who think they are smarter than Einstein and are actually proud of their ignorance... and you are a PERFECT example of such kooks and cranks!
> i think you all should keep your traps shut so you don't further embarrass yourselves. 

If you were "normal", Jim, you would have left with your tail tucked between your legs a long time ago... but your delusions are so vast that you really don't have a clue... not a clue... but... you are definitely not normal...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829564

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-03 19:00 -0700
Message-ID<d583f1e0-aea6-494d-b10f-33b3e79bffb8n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829562
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:52:32 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:39:17 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:30:43 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:13:36 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> > > > > this newsgroup? 
> > > 
> > > > Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh 
> > > > 
> > > > Sergio? 
> > > > 
> > > > Yourself? 
> > > > 
> > > > Seriously? 
> > > > 
> > > > Uh. 
> > > > 
> > > > Er. 
> > > Jim, you ignoramus, NO ONE here ever comes up with legitimate original content, since none of us are qualified to do so in physics. You and others, however, absolutely DO come up with original content, but it is as worthless as tits on a bullfrog since it is not confirmed with any evidence whatsoever! 
> > > 
> > > You could change all this, of course, with the aforementioned evidence, but that would be impossible since you don't have any evidence, and also because don't have the brains given to a watermelon. 
> > > 
> > > In a perfect world, people would come to this forum with questions about physics, and some knowledgeable folks would give them answers or direct them to knowledgeable web pages that provide answers... but for a long time this forum has been dominate by kooks and cranks who think they are smarter than Einstein and are actually proud of their ignorance... and you are a PERFECT example of such kooks and cranks! 
> > i think you all should keep your traps shut so you don't further embarrass yourselves.
> If you were "normal", Jim, you would have left with your tail tucked between your legs a long time ago... but your delusions are so vast that you really don't have a clue... not a clue... but... you are definitely not normal...

Maybe if your arguments weren't so inane.

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829581

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2021-08-04 00:48 -0500
Message-ID<imuo0pFm7g3U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#829552
On 8/3/2021 8:30 PM, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:13:36 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> 
>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in
>>> this newsgroup?
> 
>> Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh
>>
>> Sergio?
>>
>> Yourself?
>>
>> Seriously?
>>
>> Uh.
>>
>> Er.
> 
> Jim, you ignoramus, NO ONE here ever comes up with legitimate original content, since none of us are qualified to do so in physics.

It seems to take a qualified physicist to devise answers that pass
muster, however, the same is not true for worthy questions. I give as an
example (and actually only one is needed to make this point) Augustine.

There remain as available so very many elementary questions that many
lifetimes can easily be spent just defining them. At this juncture, the
21st century, we still don't know what we don't know. It is a realm with
very few working on this issue.

> You and others, however, absolutely DO come up with original content, but it is as worthless as tits on a bullfrog since it is not confirmed with any > evidence whatsoever!

There is no problem with promoting science fiction, so long as the
proponents realize they're promoting fiction and there's the rub, the
cranks don't recognize their invalidity.


> You could change all this, of course, with the aforementioned evidence, but that would be impossible since you don't have any evidence,  and also because don't have the brains given to a watermelon.
> 
> In a perfect world, people would come to this forum with questions about physics, and some knowledgeable folks would give them answers or direct them to knowledgeable web pages that provide answers... but for a long time this forum has been dominate by kooks and cranks who think they are smarter than Einstein and are actually proud of their ignorance... and you are a PERFECT example of such kooks and cranks!
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829599

FromSolving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-04 06:53 -0700
Message-ID<3d82dc02-8151-41dc-9c26-715c931761a8n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829552
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:30:43 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:13:36 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: 
> 
> > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> > > this newsgroup? 
> 
> > Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh 
> > 
> > Sergio? 
> > 
> > Yourself? 
> > 
> > Seriously? 
> > 
> > Uh. 
> > 
> > Er.
> Jim, you ignoramus, NO ONE here ever comes up with legitimate original content, since none of us are qualified to do so in physics. 

Did it never occur to you that the people you consider to be "qualified" are not actually qualified?  

Much of science has been dumbed down to pander to the lowest common denominator of the science consuming public.  

You dumb bunnies can continue to do what dumb bunnies do, follow the lead of those that are, "qualified."  

For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies.

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829601

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2021-08-04 09:18 -0500
Message-ID<imvltsFs983U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#829599
On 8/4/2021 8:53 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:30:43 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:13:36 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
>>
>>>> Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in
>>>> this newsgroup?
>>
>>> Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh
>>>
>>> Sergio?
>>>
>>> Yourself?
>>>
>>> Seriously?
>>>
>>> Uh.
>>>
>>> Er.
>> Jim, you ignoramus, NO ONE here ever comes up with legitimate original content, since none of us are qualified to do so in physics.

> Did it never occur to you that the people you consider to be "qualified" are not actually qualified?

So has it ever occurred to you that you're not a valid or impartial
judge so long as you have skin in the game? Your arguments are so
stupid that they should never be taken seriously. Would pictures help
you to understand?

> Much of science has been dumbed down to pander to the lowest common denominator of the science consuming public.
> 
> You dumb bunnies can continue to do what dumb bunnies do, follow the lead of those that are, "qualified."
> 
> For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies.
> 
> James McGinn / Genius
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829609

FromClutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-04 10:30 -0500
Message-ID<seebq1$o35$1@solani.org>
In reply to#829599
On 8/4/2021 8:53 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies.

True. And this goes beyond just the portion of science that is 
teachable. A true (or "natural") scientist often is more than just what 
he got trained in.

All humans as infants are natural scientists finding out about the world 
around them, but in later years of life many cease that sense as soon as 
they become familiar enough with their surroundings to get by. But some 
won't! And this distinguishes between different species of humans. The 
latter are the ones who stay natural scientists, even with no training 
or skill or knowledge.

Among the latter, majority get overwhelmed with vicissitudes of life and 
automatically their everyday spontaneous scientific activity goes to 
margins and they get on with their easy lives, but a minority choose to 
seek more and end up eventually becoming experts in natural sciences 
(physics, biology,..).

I also think that, on average, Cro-Magnon human populate the former, 
i.e. those who cease their sense of finding things out after infancy is 
over. Modern humans keep that sense in them and it stays in them in 
reserve in case they get the need to use it.

Cro-Magnon human does science only when an award mechanism is in place. 
Modern human doesn't need award mechanism to do science.





-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829617

FromAndy Everett <andyeverett57@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-04 10:09 -0700
Message-ID<94e301b8-eada-4b73-8409-3a259af03a95n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829599
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:53:48 AM UTC-4, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:30:43 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:13:36 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: 
> > 
> > > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> > > > this newsgroup? 
> > 
> > > Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh 
> > > 
> > > Sergio? 
> > > 
> > > Yourself? 
> > > 
> > > Seriously? 
> > > 
> > > Uh. 
> > > 
> > > Er. 
> > Jim, you ignoramus, NO ONE here ever comes up with legitimate original content, since none of us are qualified to do so in physics.
> Did it never occur to you that the people you consider to be "qualified" are not actually qualified? 


Go look at some cutting edge research papers on say quantum optics, dumbed down, you don't know what you are talking about.

Play the game Jim, write up some papers and submit them to journals. You won't bother because you don't have what it takes. You will die pushing that water molecules are permanent magnetic dipoles and other such nonsense. Some people just don't have what it takes to do cutting edge science research, it isn't easy.

> 
> Much of science has been dumbed down to pander to the lowest common denominator of the science consuming public. 

Bullshit.

> 
> You dumb bunnies can continue to do what dumb bunnies do, follow the lead of those that are, "qualified." 
> 
> For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies. 
> 
> James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829620

FromSolving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-04 10:44 -0700
Message-ID<1f99ea53-1fbc-4547-acd1-60866abecfbfn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829617
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 10:09:53 AM UTC-7, andyev...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 9:53:48 AM UTC-4, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:30:43 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 6:13:36 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > > On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 4:24:10 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > > Why are the rest of you allowing the cranks to drive the conversation in 
> > > > > this newsgroup? 
> > > 
> > > > Uh, er . . . uh, so, you expect an Alsing or a Moroney to come up with original content? Uh, er . . . uh 
> > > > 
> > > > Sergio? 
> > > > 
> > > > Yourself? 
> > > > 
> > > > Seriously? 
> > > > 
> > > > Uh. 
> > > > 
> > > > Er. 
> > > Jim, you ignoramus, NO ONE here ever comes up with legitimate original content, since none of us are qualified to do so in physics. 
> > Did it never occur to you that the people you consider to be "qualified" are not actually qualified?

> Go look at some cutting edge research papers on say quantum optics,

Morons like yourself can't distinguish between "cutting edge," and nonsense.  So you depend on experts.  Unfortunately, the experts are just pretending to be experts.  


 dumbed down, you don't know what you are talking about. 
> 
> Play the game Jim, write up some papers and submit them to journals. You won't bother because you don't have what it takes. You will die pushing that water molecules are permanent magnetic dipoles

The belief that water molecules are "permanent dipole magnets," is itself the dumbed down notion that you will find in all the text books.  You are so dull-witted and eager to believe that you don't realize that you just dismissed the model that is taught in all the textbooks.  It is the fact that there are millions and millions of morons like yourself that are eager to be obedient to the "truth" of science but who fail to understand it that is the biggest problem in science today.  And the internet has made it worse because it gives lazy-ass morons like yourself a voice.  This is why it sometimes takes hundreds of years for breakthroughs to come to the surface because it takes that long to overcome the momentum of the conviction of millions and millions of braindead believers who are too lazy to make the effort to actually understand what they believe.

understand that you failed to comprehend
 and other such nonsense. Some people just don't have what it takes to do cutting edge science research, it isn't easy.
> > 
> > Much of science has been dumbed down to pander to the lowest common denominator of the science consuming public.

> Bullshit.

You got nothing, you confused nitwit!

> > 
> > You dumb bunnies can continue to do what dumb bunnies do, follow the lead of those that are, "qualified." 
> > 
> > For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies. 
> > 
> > James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829627

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-04 12:01 -0700
Message-ID<a31e6e1a-7483-46d8-8e40-31e6987a3480n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829599
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 6:53:48 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote:

> For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies. 

Yet another lie from McGinn. While the "application of reason" is fine, science is actually based on evidence, something about which you have no knowledge... making *you* the dumb bunny in the room...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829629

FromSolving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-04 12:10 -0700
Message-ID<3a85f0d1-33a2-479d-ae66-3d4ed2815503n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829627
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:01:30 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 6:53:48 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: 
> 
> > For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies.
> Yet another lie from McGinn. While the "application of reason" is fine, science is actually based on evidence, something about which you have no knowledge... making *you* the dumb bunny in the room...

With every post from you nitwits you further confirm my premise that none of you understands any of this.  For all of you science is just braindead button pushing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829630

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-04 12:28 -0700
Message-ID<e65d0a14-51d9-435f-a837-ef8ae0927848n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829629
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:10:09 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:01:30 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 6:53:48 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > 
> > > For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies. 

> > Yet another lie from McGinn. While the "application of reason" is fine, science is actually based on evidence, something about which you have no knowledge... making *you* the dumb bunny in the room..
.
> With every post from you nitwits you further confirm my premise that none of you understands any of this. For all of you science is just braindead button pushing.

Since you have failed to provide evidence that your magnificent nanodroplets even exist, it seems to me that it is *you* who does not understand any of this.

“ I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken. ”
- Oliver Cromwell.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829632

FromSolving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-04 13:00 -0700
Message-ID<3c339703-7a16-4a9d-b81e-42bf26591324n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#829630
On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:28:52 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:10:09 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:01:30 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 6:53:48 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies. 
> 
> > > Yet another lie from McGinn. While the "application of reason" is fine, science is actually based on evidence, something about which you have no knowledge... making *you* the dumb bunny in the room.. 
> . 
> > With every post from you nitwits you further confirm my premise that none of you understands any of this. For all of you science is just braindead button pushing.
> Since you have failed to provide evidence

You cannot deny that the best evidence we have is the H2O phase diagram.  No evidence contradicts this.  You cannot deny this.  All you can do is pretend not to notice it.

Checkmate.

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#829635

FromSergio <invaled@invalid.com>
Date2021-08-04 15:18 -0500
Message-ID<seesma$v6t$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#829632
On 8/4/2021 3:00 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:28:52 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:10:09 PM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: 
>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 12:01:30 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 6:53:48 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>> For me science involves application of reason which is available to all who chose to not be dumb bunnies. 
>>
>>>> Yet another lie from McGinn. While the "application of reason" is fine, science is actually based on evidence, something about which you have no knowledge... making *you* the dumb bunny in the room.. 
>> . 
>>> With every post from you nitwits you further confirm my premise that none of you understands any of this. For all of you science is just braindead button pushing.
>> Since you have failed to provide evidence
> 
> You cannot deny that the best evidence we have is the H2O phase diagram.  No evidence contradicts this.  You cannot deny this.  All you can do is pretend not to notice it.
> 
> Checkmate.
> 
> James McGinn / Genius
> 

Pretend Science Guy James McGinn Quacking Again,
  It is time for his Final Medicine

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web