Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #828233 > unrolled thread

Gamma

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Gamma John Sefton <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2021-07-20 07:07 -0700
    Re: Gamma Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-07-20 10:34 -0400
    Re: Gamma whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-20 11:48 -0500
      Re: Gamma John Sefton <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2021-07-21 07:29 -0700
        Re: Gamma whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-21 12:45 -0500
          Re: Gamma "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-21 11:19 -0700
          Re: Gamma John Sefton <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2021-07-22 09:10 -0700
            Re: Gamma whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-22 13:44 -0500
    Re: Gamma "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-20 11:04 -0700

#828233 — Gamma

So, there's an excess of gamma from around the galaxy's center.
And my model indicates that the Galactic Bar is antimatter.
Cool.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/Bear.GIF

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#828234

On 7/20/2021 10:07 AM, John Sefton wrote:
> So, there's an excess of gamma from around the galaxy's center.
> And my model indicates that the Galactic Bar is antimatter.
> Cool.

You don't have a model.

There's not enough annihilation radiation for any portion of the galaxy 
to be antimatter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#828250

On 7/20/2021 9:07 AM, John Sefton wrote:
> So, there's an excess of gamma from around the galaxy's center.
> And my model indicates that the Galactic Bar is antimatter.
> Cool.
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/Bear.GIF

How about starting with the criterion for determining what
constitutes "an excess of gamma." Is there some real(tm)
basis for this latest pronouncement by you?

Hint, your colon doesn't produce scientific fact.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#828370

On Tuesday, 20 July 2021 at 10:49:08 UTC-6, whodat wrote:
> On 7/20/2021 9:07 AM, John Sefton wrote: 
> > So, there's an excess of gamma from around the galaxy's center. 
> > And my model indicates that the Galactic Bar is antimatter. 
> > Cool. 
> > http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/Bear.GIF
> How about starting with the criterion for determining what 
> constitutes "an excess of gamma." Is there some real(tm) 
> basis for this latest pronouncement by you? 
> 
> Hint, your colon doesn't produce scientific fact.
https://www.space.com/36696-gamma-ray-signal-not-dark-matter.html
I literally typed 'excess of gamma' in Google and here's the first hit.
The galactic Bar is lining up with (our?) arms, right now, and there are large clouds of Hydrogen observed- the largest of which are right above the tip of the Bar.
Does the Bar produce Hydrogen, and then deliver it to the stars? (In case their 'ball of gas' is running low.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#828408

On 7/21/2021 9:29 AM, John Sefton wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 July 2021 at 10:49:08 UTC-6, whodat wrote:
>> On 7/20/2021 9:07 AM, John Sefton wrote:
>>> So, there's an excess of gamma from around the galaxy's center.
>>> And my model indicates that the Galactic Bar is antimatter.
>>> Cool.
>>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/Bear.GIF
>> How about starting with the criterion for determining what
>> constitutes "an excess of gamma." Is there some real(tm)
>> basis for this latest pronouncement by you?
>>
>> Hint, your colon doesn't produce scientific fact.
> https://www.space.com/36696-gamma-ray-signal-not-dark-matter.html
> I literally typed 'excess of gamma' in Google and here's the first hit.
> The galactic Bar is lining up with (our?) arms, right now, and there are large clouds of Hydrogen observed- the largest of which are right above the tip of the Bar.
> Does the Bar produce Hydrogen, and then deliver it to the stars? (In case their 'ball of gas' is running low.)
> 

You know what? I don't care how many web pages are devoted to the topic.

I asked you to tell me what the criterion for determining "an excess of
gamma" is all about. I haven't seen a reply from you.

There a good reason for that question. All sorts of faddish (and some
real) science stories break and become "the latest thing." So the
real(tm) issue is what part, of what you are providing, I should listen
to.

Unfortunately, John, you haven't been doing a very good job on that.

Just to make a point, "cold fusion" yields 333,000,000 hits.

Content, John, not quantity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#828412

On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 10:45:20 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> On 7/21/2021 9:29 AM, John Sefton wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, 20 July 2021 at 10:49:08 UTC-6, whodat wrote: 
> >> On 7/20/2021 9:07 AM, John Sefton wrote: 
> >>> So, there's an excess of gamma from around the galaxy's center. 
> >>> And my model indicates that the Galactic Bar is antimatter. 
> >>> Cool. 
> >>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/Bear.GIF 
> >> How about starting with the criterion for determining what 
> >> constitutes "an excess of gamma." Is there some real(tm) 
> >> basis for this latest pronouncement by you? 
> >> 
> >> Hint, your colon doesn't produce scientific fact. 
> > https://www.space.com/36696-gamma-ray-signal-not-dark-matter.html 
> > I literally typed 'excess of gamma' in Google and here's the first hit. 
> > The galactic Bar is lining up with (our?) arms, right now, and there are large clouds of Hydrogen observed- the largest of which are right above the tip of the Bar. 
> > Does the Bar produce Hydrogen, and then deliver it to the stars? (In case their 'ball of gas' is running low.) 
> >
> You know what? I don't care how many web pages are devoted to the topic. 
> 
> I asked you to tell me what the criterion for determining "an excess of 
> gamma" is all about. I haven't seen a reply from you. 
> 
> There a good reason for that question. All sorts of faddish (and some 
> real) science stories break and become "the latest thing." So the 
> real(tm) issue is what part, of what you are providing, I should listen 
> to. 
> 
> Unfortunately, John, you haven't been doing a very good job on that. 
> 
> Just to make a point, "cold fusion" yields 333,000,000 hits. 
> 
> Content, John, not quantity.

Gamma has to be programmed for its math order.
That is by a speed quantity that get's squared.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#828553

On Wednesday, 21 July 2021 at 11:45:20 UTC-6, whodat wrote:
> On 7/21/2021 9:29 AM, John Sefton wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, 20 July 2021 at 10:49:08 UTC-6, whodat wrote: 
> >> On 7/20/2021 9:07 AM, John Sefton wrote: 
> >>> So, there's an excess of gamma from around the galaxy's center. 
> >>> And my model indicates that the Galactic Bar is antimatter. 
> >>> Cool. 
> >>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/Bear.GIF 
> >> How about starting with the criterion for determining what 
> >> constitutes "an excess of gamma." Is there some real(tm) 
> >> basis for this latest pronouncement by you? 
> >> 
> >> Hint, your colon doesn't produce scientific fact. 
> > https://www.space.com/36696-gamma-ray-signal-not-dark-matter.html 
> > I literally typed 'excess of gamma' in Google and here's the first hit. 
> > The galactic Bar is lining up with (our?) arms, right now, and there are large clouds of Hydrogen observed- the largest of which are right above the tip of the Bar. 
> > Does the Bar produce Hydrogen, and then deliver it to the stars? (In case their 'ball of gas' is running low.) 
> >
> You know what? I don't care how many web pages are devoted to the topic. 
> 
> I asked you to tell me what the criterion for determining "an excess of 
> gamma" is all about. I haven't seen a reply from you. 
> 
> There a good reason for that question. All sorts of faddish (and some 
> real) science stories break and become "the latest thing." So the 
> real(tm) issue is what part, of what you are providing, I should listen 
> to. 
> 
> Unfortunately, John, you haven't been doing a very good job on that. 
> 
> Just to make a point, "cold fusion" yields 333,000,000 hits. 
> 
> Content, John, not quantity.
The end of the Bar, where it is engaging the end of an Arm, is where the most Hydrogen seems to be.
You seem to have no interest in any of these observations.
You're not genuous

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#828574

On 7/22/2021 11:10 AM, John Sefton wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 July 2021 at 11:45:20 UTC-6, whodat wrote:
>> On 7/21/2021 9:29 AM, John Sefton wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 20 July 2021 at 10:49:08 UTC-6, whodat wrote:
>>>> On 7/20/2021 9:07 AM, John Sefton wrote:
>>>>> So, there's an excess of gamma from around the galaxy's center.
>>>>> And my model indicates that the Galactic Bar is antimatter.
>>>>> Cool.
>>>>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/Bear.GIF
>>>> How about starting with the criterion for determining what
>>>> constitutes "an excess of gamma." Is there some real(tm)
>>>> basis for this latest pronouncement by you?
>>>>
>>>> Hint, your colon doesn't produce scientific fact.
>>> https://www.space.com/36696-gamma-ray-signal-not-dark-matter.html
>>> I literally typed 'excess of gamma' in Google and here's the first hit.
>>> The galactic Bar is lining up with (our?) arms, right now, and there are large clouds of Hydrogen observed- the largest of which are right above the tip of the Bar.
>>> Does the Bar produce Hydrogen, and then deliver it to the stars? (In case their 'ball of gas' is running low.)
>>>
>> You know what? I don't care how many web pages are devoted to the topic.
>>
>> I asked you to tell me what the criterion for determining "an excess of
>> gamma" is all about. I haven't seen a reply from you.
>>
>> There a good reason for that question. All sorts of faddish (and some
>> real) science stories break and become "the latest thing." So the
>> real(tm) issue is what part, of what you are providing, I should listen
>> to.
>>
>> Unfortunately, John, you haven't been doing a very good job on that.
>>
>> Just to make a point, "cold fusion" yields 333,000,000 hits.
>>
>> Content, John, not quantity.
> The end of the Bar, where it is engaging the end of an Arm, is where the most Hydrogen seems to be.
> You seem to have no interest in any of these observations.
> You're not genuous

Are you completely incapable of discussing a topic you
brought into the sci.physics and I expressed an interest
in?

This is the third round of me asking you to define a term
pertinent to the discussion you started. What is the
criterion for determining what constitutes "an excess of
gamma."

If you don't know just say so, this beating around the bush
and attempts to derail the discussion by throwing switches
to sidetrack it may work in a tavern but, but wake up man,
this isn't a tavern.

My not following in your footsteps does not make me "not
genuous." So far you get a participation trophy. Is that
what you want? If it is, we're done.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#828268

On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 at 7:07:28 AM UTC-7, johnse...@gmail.com wrote:
> So, there's an excess of gamma from around the galaxy's center. 

Gamma math is order curve with everything.
Atomic speed programs it.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web