Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #827743 > unrolled thread

Emergence of new species

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Emergence of new species "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-14 16:11 -0700
    Re: Emergence of new species Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-07-15 12:53 -0400
      Re: Emergence of new species "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 10:30 -0700
        Re: Emergence of new species Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-07-15 14:25 -0400
          Re: Emergence of new species "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 11:36 -0700
            Re: Emergence of new species Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-07-15 16:15 -0400
              Re: Emergence of new species "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 16:45 -0700
                Re: Emergence of new species Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 09:36 -0700
                  Re: Emergence of new species Sergio <invaled@invalid.com> - 2021-07-16 11:47 -0500
                  Re: Emergence of new species "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 10:03 -0700
                    Re: Emergence of new species Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 10:07 -0700
                      Re: Emergence of new species "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 10:28 -0700
                  Re: Emergence of new species whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-16 14:35 -0500
                    Re: Emergence of new species Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 13:11 -0700
                      Re: Emergence of new species Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-07-16 13:21 -0700
                      Re: Emergence of new species whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-16 15:51 -0500
                    Re: Emergence of new species Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 15:32 -0500
                    Re: Emergence of new species Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 13:43 -0700
                      Re: Emergence of new species whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-16 15:59 -0500
                        Re: Emergence of new species "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 18:39 -0700

#827743 — Emergence of new species

before it was called punctuated equilibrium..
it happened to fast an left no fossils.
Why at a species jump would there be
a fossil exception?
It was given a new name to start it over
the missing links.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#827762

On 7/14/2021 7:11 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> before it was called punctuated equilibrium..
> it happened to fast an left no fossils.
> Why at a species jump would there be
> a fossil exception?

We find intermediate fossils all the time, Roy.  It is an interesting 
science you know nothing about.

> It was given a new name to start it over
> the missing links.

With plants, at least, a new species can technically be created in one 
generation with no intermediates possible.  If the parents are diploid 
but the offspring tetraploid, the offspring could not reproduce with the 
diploid parent species to produce fertile young, but could with other 
tetraploid plants produced the same way. That meets the definition of 
different species. But normally species transitions are gradual, and 
they can and do leave fossils.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827765

On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:53:04 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 7/14/2021 7:11 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > before it was called punctuated equilibrium.. 
> > it happened to fast an left no fossils. 
> > Why at a species jump would there be 
> > a fossil exception?
> We find intermediate fossils all the time, Roy. It is an interesting 
> science you know nothing about.

Then why are there missing links you moron?
why are they at species jumps?

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827776

On 7/15/2021 1:30 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:53:04 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 7/14/2021 7:11 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> before it was called punctuated equilibrium..
>>> it happened to fast an left no fossils.
>>> Why at a species jump would there be
>>> a fossil exception?
>> We find intermediate fossils all the time, Roy. It is an interesting
>> science you know nothing about.
> 
> Then why are there missing links you moron?

Because all relevant fossils haven't been found, Roy. But they find more 
all the time.

> why are they at species jumps?

Other than something like what I described with plants, the so-called 
"jumps" are actually slow, but may appear quick compared to million-year 
timelines.  Especially when intermediate fossils haven't been found. For 
example, perhaps you may be considered a (de-)evolution of humans to 
something dumber, and it would look like a species jump if they didn't 
find your monkey ancestors.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827777

On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 11:25:44 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 7/15/2021 1:30 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:53:04 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> >> On 7/14/2021 7:11 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >>> before it was called punctuated equilibrium.. 
> >>> it happened to fast an left no fossils. 
> >>> Why at a species jump would there be 
> >>> a fossil exception? 
> >> We find intermediate fossils all the time, Roy. It is an interesting 
> >> science you know nothing about. 
> > 
> > Then why are there missing links you moron?
> Because all relevant fossils haven't been found, Roy. 

How would they be left out in the first place?
How could there be a special kind of fossil?
at the biggest DNA jump instead?

If all the rest are not special?
science was right to claim that
they could not explain emergence...
or species jumps that have a maximum
order or DNA change... why would
that be missing?

Mitchell Raemsch



> > why are they at species jumps?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827786

On 7/15/2021 2:36 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 11:25:44 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 7/15/2021 1:30 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:53:04 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>> On 7/14/2021 7:11 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> before it was called punctuated equilibrium..
>>>>> it happened to fast an left no fossils.
>>>>> Why at a species jump would there be
>>>>> a fossil exception?
>>>> We find intermediate fossils all the time, Roy. It is an interesting
>>>> science you know nothing about.
>>>
>>> Then why are there missing links you moron?
>> Because all relevant fossils haven't been found, Roy.
> 
> How would they be left out in the first place?

Smitch, you moron, there is nobody to tell the paleontologists where to 
dig. There is no fossil divining rod.  Plus there are many, many places 
where they simply can't dig. It's often pure luck to find a useful fossil.

> How could there be a special kind of fossil?

There is no special type of fossil. Fossils are fossils.

> If all the rest are not special?

There is no special fossil.  Only fossils which can reveal lots of new 
information.

You need to Google those things, Roy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827799

On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 1:15:19 PM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 7/15/2021 2:36 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 11:25:44 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> >> On 7/15/2021 1:30 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:53:04 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> >>>> On 7/14/2021 7:11 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >>>>> before it was called punctuated equilibrium.. 
> >>>>> it happened to fast an left no fossils. 
> >>>>> Why at a species jump would there be 
> >>>>> a fossil exception? 
> >>>> We find intermediate fossils all the time, Roy. It is an interesting 
> >>>> science you know nothing about. 
> >>> 
> >>> Then why are there missing links you moron? 
> >> Because all relevant fossils haven't been found, Roy. 

So you have no proof then.
What are you waiting for?

> > 
> > How would they be left out in the first place?
> Smitch, you moron, there is nobody to tell the paleontologists where to 
> dig. There is no fossil divining rod. Plus there are many, many places 
> where they simply can't dig. It's often pure luck to find a useful fossil.
> > How could there be a special kind of fossil?
> There is no special type of fossil. Fossils are fossils.

Then why would some be different?
why would some not be found?
there is no special place for the missing link
to hide you moron.... it would be around
with the rest in a statistical way.
They do not hide...


Mitchell Raemsch

> > If all the rest are not special?
> There is no special fossil. Only fossils which can reveal lots of new 
> information. 
> 
> You need to Google those things, Roy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827846

On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer.  I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer.

Give me a few days.

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827847

On 7/16/2021 11:36 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 

> 
> James McGinn / goofball
> 

stay out of the thread, moron.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827853

On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 9:37:02 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> 
> Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer. I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer. 
> 
> Give me a few days. 
> 

Why can't you do it now you moron?
What are you waiting for?
I already have the answer.
There are no special fossils
that have been hard to find...

Mitchell Raemsch

> James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827854

On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 10:03:38 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 9:37:02 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > 
> > Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer. I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer. 
> > 
> > Give me a few days. 
> >
> Why can't you do it now you moron?
> What are you waiting for?
> I already have the answer. 
> There are no special fossils 
> that have been hard to find... 
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch 
> 
> > James McGinn / Genius

Genius needs time to incubate.  In the meantime, you have Sergio here to entertain you.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827857

On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 10:07:07 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 10:03:38 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 9:37:02 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > 
> > > Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer. I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer. 
> > > 
> > > Give me a few days. 
> > > 
> > Why can't you do it now you moron? 
> > What are you waiting for? 
> > I already have the answer. 
> > There are no special fossils 
> > that have been hard to find... 
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch 
> > 
> > > James McGinn / Genius
> Genius needs time to incubate.

But why would you claim to be a genius you moron?
Who told you that?

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827870

On 7/16/2021 11:36 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer.  I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer.
> 
> Give me a few days.
> 
> James McGinn / Genius

As I wrote earlier, real(tm) scientists are published in peer reviewed
journals. So please provide citations to your articles published in
peer reviewed journals. Thanks in advance.

OTOH, if you fail to produce such citations, you're not a real(tm)
scientist. Here's your opportunity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827873

On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 12:35:41 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> On 7/16/2021 11:36 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > 
> > Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer. I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer. 
> > 
> > Give me a few days. 
> > 
> > James McGinn / Genius
> As I wrote earlier, real(tm) scientists are published in peer reviewed 
> journals. So please provide citations to your articles published in 
> peer reviewed journals. Thanks in advance. 
> 
> OTOH, if you fail to produce such citations, you're not a real(tm) 
> scientist. Here's your opportunity.
pal review is not science
its politics

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827876

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 12:35:41 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
>> On 7/16/2021 11:36 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
>> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> > 
>> > Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer. I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer. 
>> > 
>> > Give me a few days. 
>> > 
>> > James McGinn / Genius
>> As I wrote earlier, real(tm) scientists are published in peer reviewed 
>> journals. So please provide citations to your articles published in 
>> peer reviewed journals. Thanks in advance. 
>> 
>> OTOH, if you fail to produce such citations, you're not a real(tm) 
>> scientist. Here's your opportunity.
> pal review is not science
> its politics

Did you mean to say "Peer review is not science, it is politcs.", you 
illiterate, babbling lunatic?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827885

On 7/16/2021 3:11 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 12:35:41 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
>> On 7/16/2021 11:36 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer. I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer.
>>>
>>> Give me a few days.
>>>
>>> James McGinn / Genius
>> As I wrote earlier, real(tm) scientists are published in peer reviewed
>> journals. So please provide citations to your articles published in
>> peer reviewed journals. Thanks in advance.
>>
>> OTOH, if you fail to produce such citations, you're not a real(tm)
>> scientist. Here's your opportunity.
> pal review is not science
> its politics

Only cranks (not real(tm) scientists) believe that. Peer review assures
advances in science, without it there is nothing new, just the same old
blubber similar to the crap you're spouting. You seem to claim you're
advancing science, but without peer review you're just a wannabe at
best.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827877

On 7/16/2021 2:35 PM, whodat wrote:
> OTOH, if you fail to produce such citations, you're not a real(tm)
> scientist. Here's your opportunity.



Some fucking nerve you have you demented fart ... Hehe :)

Scientists' "opportunity" is not given to them by a rat. Press your 
stupid brain hard to understand this :)




-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827881

On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 12:35:41 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> On 7/16/2021 11:36 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > 
> > Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer. I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer. 
> > 
> > Give me a few days. 
> > 
> > James McGinn / Genius
> As I wrote earlier, real(tm) scientists are published in peer reviewed 
> journals. So please provide citations to your articles published in 
> peer reviewed journals. Thanks in advance. 
> 
> OTOH, if you fail to produce such citations, you're not a real(tm) 
> scientist. Here's your opportunity.
If you need citations its because you are not intelligent enough to think for yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827888

On 7/16/2021 3:43 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 12:35:41 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
>> On 7/16/2021 11:36 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer. I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer.
>>>
>>> Give me a few days.
>>>
>>> James McGinn / Genius
>> As I wrote earlier, real(tm) scientists are published in peer reviewed
>> journals. So please provide citations to your articles published in
>> peer reviewed journals. Thanks in advance.
>>
>> OTOH, if you fail to produce such citations, you're not a real(tm)
>> scientist. Here's your opportunity.
> If you need citations its because you are not intelligent enough to think for yourself.

What I think or don't think has no relationship to determining how
a real(tm) scientist is determined. Are you intelligent enough to even
discuss such matters? It doesn't seem as though today has been good for
you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#827908

On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 1:59:40 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> On 7/16/2021 3:43 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: 
> > On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 12:35:41 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: 
> >> On 7/16/2021 11:36 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: 
> >>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >>> 
> >>> Okay, Mitch, now that the morons and panzees have had a chance to make asses out of themselves I, James McGinn (a real scientist) will provide you with the correct answer. I just want to warn you ahead of time, you are not going to like the answer. 
> >>> 
> >>> Give me a few days. 
> >>> 
> >>> James McGinn / Genius 
> >> As I wrote earlier, real(tm) scientists are published in peer reviewed 
> >> journals. So please provide citations to your articles published in 
> >> peer reviewed journals. Thanks in advance. 
> >> 
> >> OTOH, if you fail to produce such citations, you're not a real(tm) 
> >> scientist. Here's your opportunity. 
> > If you need citations its because you are not intelligent enough to think for yourself.
> What I think or don't think has no relationship to determining how 
> a real(tm) scientist is determined. Are you intelligent enough to even 
> discuss such matters? It doesn't seem as though today has been good for 
> you.

How do you know religion is not real.
Why did Einstein have a God.
He said on his last day that the
atheists were his problem all
along. They had to do science
for a wrong reason.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web