Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #827792 > unrolled thread

Covid is Fake

Started byJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post2021-07-15 14:38 -0700
Last post2021-07-25 12:42 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 46 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Covid is Fake James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 14:38 -0700
    Re: Covid is Fake Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 20:23 -0700
      Re: Covid is Fake James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 20:39 -0700
        Re: Covid is Fake Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 20:51 -0700
          Re: Covid is Fake James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 21:00 -0700
            Re: Covid is Fake Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-07-26 18:21 -0700
              Re: Covid is Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-07-26 18:58 -0700
          Re: Covid is Fake "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 21:06 -0700
            Re: Covid is Fake James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 21:52 -0700
              Re: Covid is Fake Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 18:36 -0700
                Re: Covid is Fake Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 18:44 -0700
                  Re: Covid is Fake Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 19:00 -0700
                    Re: Covid is Fake Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 19:02 -0700
                      Re: Covid is Fake Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 19:19 -0700
                        Re: Covid is Fake Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-07-25 09:48 -0500
      Re: Covid is Fake whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-15 23:58 -0500
        Re: Covid is Fake James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 22:26 -0700
          Re: Covid is Fake whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-16 00:58 -0500
            Re: Covid is Fake James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 23:36 -0700
              Re: Covid is Fake Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-07-16 08:17 -0400
                Re: Covid is Fake whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-16 16:05 -0500
              Re: Covid is Fake whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-16 07:30 -0500
                Re: Covid is Fake Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 08:38 -0700
                  Re: Covid is Fake Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-07-16 11:58 -0400
                  Re: Covid is Fake whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-16 14:30 -0500
                    Re: Covid is Fake Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 13:36 -0700
                      Re: Covid is Fake whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-16 15:55 -0500
          Re: Covid is Fake Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 12:09 -0700
    Re: Covid is Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-07-15 23:37 -0700
      Re: Covid is Fake James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 00:01 -0700
        Re: Covid is Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 00:51 -0700
          Re: Covid is Fake Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 13:41 -0700
            Re: Covid is Fake whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-07-16 15:56 -0500
            Re: Covid is Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 01:51 -0700
              Re: Covid is Fake Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 01:54 -0700
                Re: Covid is Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 02:16 -0700
                  Re: Covid is Fake Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 11:28 -0500
                    Re: Covid is Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 17:55 -0700
                      Re: Covid is Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 19:19 -0700
                        Re: Covid is Fake Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 19:25 -0700
                          Re: Covid is Fake Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-24 19:36 -0700
                            Re: Covid is Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-07-26 18:53 -0700
              Re: Covid is Fake Sunil Sethi <tsp2opt@gmail.com> - 2021-07-27 08:29 -0700
                Of He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 11:24 -0700
    Re: Covid is Fake Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2021-07-23 16:18 -0700
    Re: Covid is Fake "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-07-25 12:42 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →


#827792 — Covid is Fake

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-15 14:38 -0700
SubjectCovid is Fake
Message-ID<b4b4ed34-ef5a-4beb-b81e-9ea2ba28c92en@googlegroups.com>
Covid is Fake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#827810

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-15 20:23 -0700
Message-ID<7f731d8a-6a54-4eff-8595-5614440037aan@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827792
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> Covid is Fake 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg

Must you always choose cranks to follow?

https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827811

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-15 20:39 -0700
Message-ID<fda593b6-c15f-4cf4-9f39-9e0a4cb969b9n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827810
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:23:21 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > Covid is Fake 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg
> Must you always choose cranks to follow? 
> 
> https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm 
> 
> https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt 
> 
> https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html

You go with the consensus.  I'll go with the people that actually know what they are talking about.

Denis Rancourt is a real scientist.  He's not just playing to the media dopes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827812

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-15 20:51 -0700
Message-ID<893ba8c8-2a19-45ed-85fe-e04d29c7211an@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827811
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:39:48 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:23:21 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > Covid is Fake 
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg 
> > Must you always choose cranks to follow? 
> > 
> > https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm 
> > 
> > https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt 
> > 
> > https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html
> You go with the consensus. I'll go with the people that actually know what they are talking about. 
> 
> Denis Rancourt is a real scientist. He's not just playing to the media dopes.

He is not even a doctor, he is physicist who was fired in 2008 for cause. He is a very controversial fellow and has been lambasted by actual physicians. As you usually do, you are backing the wrong horse... again!

How does you new hero explain the 4 million covid-19 deaths world-wide and the 600,000+ deaths here in the USA? Are these deaths also just fakes? Are you really that stupid? I am convinced that you are!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827813

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-15 21:00 -0700
Message-ID<52e0a4d0-c2e0-4dde-81ee-7b5cfe05c2c1n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827812
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:51:58 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:39:48 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:23:21 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > > Covid is Fake 
> > > > 
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg 
> > > Must you always choose cranks to follow? 
> > > 
> > > https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm 
> > > 
> > > https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt 
> > > 
> > > https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html 
> > You go with the consensus. I'll go with the people that actually know what they are talking about. 
> > 
> > Denis Rancourt is a real scientist. He's not just playing to the media dopes.
> He is not even a doctor, he is physicist who was fired in 2008 for cause. He is a very controversial fellow and has been lambasted by actual physicians. As you usually do, you are backing the wrong horse... again! 
> 
> How does you new hero explain the 4 million covid-19 deaths world-wide and the 600,000+ deaths here in the USA? Are these deaths also just fakes? Are you really that stupid? I am convinced that you are!

He's a real scientists.  The system heavily favors pretenders.  IOW, the system favors those that appeal to the lowest common denominator, like yourself.  The reason is because of millions and millions of braindead science consumers who can't think for themselves.  

In short, Denis Rancourt is not a sellout or a global warming phoney.

You go with the consensus.  I will always go with the real scientist. There is a very distinct difference that a pretender like yourself could never understand.

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#828920

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-26 18:21 -0700
Message-ID<703fb2d8-c9c8-4cfa-b750-b79ed09f56e2n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827813
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:01:01 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:51:58 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:39:48 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:23:21 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > > > Covid is Fake 
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg 
> > > > Must you always choose cranks to follow? 
> > > > 
> > > > https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm 
> > > > 
> > > > https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt 
> > > > 
> > > > https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html 
> > > You go with the consensus. I'll go with the people that actually know what they are talking about. 
> > > 
> > > Denis Rancourt is a real scientist. He's not just playing to the media dopes. 
> > He is not even a doctor, he is physicist who was fired in 2008 for cause. He is a very controversial fellow and has been lambasted by actual physicians. As you usually do, you are backing the wrong horse... again! 
> > 
> > How does you new hero explain the 4 million covid-19 deaths world-wide and the 600,000+ deaths here in the USA? Are these deaths also just fakes? Are you really that stupid? I am convinced that you are!
> He's a real scientists. The system heavily favors pretenders. IOW, the system favors those that appeal to the lowest common denominator, like yourself. The reason is because of millions and millions of braindead science consumers who can't think for themselves. 
> 
> In short, Denis Rancourt is not a sellout or a global warming phoney. 
> 
> You go with the consensus. I will always go with the real scientist. There is a very distinct difference that a pretender like yourself could never understand. 

Man, all these doctors, nurses, microbiologists, immunologists, epidemiologists & researchers keep saying COVID-19 is dangerous but all these people I went to high school with who barely passed science say it’s not. It’s so hard to know who to believe anymore. Am I Right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#828929

FromArindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-26 18:58 -0700
Message-ID<a8e623fb-c798-4f6c-9062-69a34dc6f05dn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#828920
On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 11:22:02 UTC+10, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:01:01 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:51:58 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:39:48 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:23:21 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > > > > Covid is Fake 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg
> > > > > Must you always choose cranks to follow? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm 
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt 
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html
> > > > You go with the consensus. I'll go with the people that actually know what they are talking about. 
> > > > 
> > > > Denis Rancourt is a real scientist. He's not just playing to the media dopes. 
> > > He is not even a doctor, he is physicist who was fired in 2008 for cause. He is a very controversial fellow and has been lambasted by actual physicians. As you usually do, you are backing the wrong horse... again! 
> > > 
> > > How does you new hero explain the 4 million covid-19 deaths world-wide and the 600,000+ deaths here in the USA? Are these deaths also just fakes? Are you really that stupid? I am convinced that you are! 
> > He's a real scientists. The system heavily favors pretenders. IOW, the system favors those that appeal to the lowest common denominator, like yourself. The reason is because of millions and millions of braindead science consumers who can't think for themselves. 
> > 
> > In short, Denis Rancourt is not a sellout or a global warming phoney. 
> > 
> > You go with the consensus. I will always go with the real scientist. There is a very distinct difference that a pretender like yourself could never understand. 
> 
> Man, all these doctors, nurses, microbiologists, immunologists, epidemiologists & researchers keep saying COVID-19 is dangerous but all these people I went to high school with who barely passed science say it’s not. It’s so hard to know who to believe anymore. Am I Right?

For once you are. It is so hard to know who to believe and who not to. Those you trust may have been fooled. Those in authority may be corrupt. So I trust in sound theories and the facts involved, and trust the higher powers around to bless me with the correct thought processes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827814

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-15 21:06 -0700
Message-ID<0e7b48ab-527f-454c-890c-284820ab2b86n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827812
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:51:58 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:39:48 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:23:21 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > > Covid is Fake 
> > > > 
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg 
> > > Must you always choose cranks to follow? 
> > > 
> > > https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm 
> > > 
> > > https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt 
> > > 
> > > https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html 
> > You go with the consensus. I'll go with the people that actually know what they are talking about. 
> > 
> > Denis Rancourt is a real scientist. He's not just playing to the media dopes.
> He is not even a doctor, he is physicist who was fired in 2008 for cause. He is a very controversial fellow and has been lambasted by actual physicians. As you usually do, you are backing the wrong horse... again! 
> 
> How does you new hero explain the 4 million covid-19 deaths world-wide and the 600,000+ deaths here in the USA? Are these deaths also just fakes? Are you really that stupid? I am convinced that you are!

You are going to be answering to your doctor paul...
The medical community was asked to list covid where
there was complications that caused death...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827815

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-15 21:52 -0700
Message-ID<a3fa67ea-12e3-46e4-820c-f52636b5a1een@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827814
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:06:41 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:51:58 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:39:48 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 8:23:21 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> > > > > Covid is Fake 
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg 
> > > > Must you always choose cranks to follow? 
> > > > 
> > > > https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm 
> > > > 
> > > > https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt 
> > > > 
> > > > https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html 
> > > You go with the consensus. I'll go with the people that actually know what they are talking about. 
> > > 
> > > Denis Rancourt is a real scientist. He's not just playing to the media dopes. 
> > He is not even a doctor, he is physicist who was fired in 2008 for cause. He is a very controversial fellow and has been lambasted by actual physicians. As you usually do, you are backing the wrong horse... again! 
> > 
> > How does you new hero explain the 4 million covid-19 deaths world-wide and the 600,000+ deaths here in the USA? Are these deaths also just fakes? Are you really that stupid? I am convinced that you are!
> You are going to be answering to your doctor paul... 
> The medical community was asked to list covid where 
> there was complications that caused death...

Right.  All along they have had a financial incentive to fudge the statistics.  

Covid is just a big money grab.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#828760

FromMostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-24 18:36 -0700
Message-ID<ad22f266-7383-433c-9203-5a335eb42d40n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827815
Sounds like James McGinn is a complete moron:

 While there is no way to tell exactly what the economic 
damage from the global COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic 
will be, there is widespread agreement among economists 
that it will have severe negative impacts on the global 
economy. Early estimates predicated that, should the 
virus become a global pandemic, most major economies 
will lose at least 2.9 percent of their gross domestic product 
(GDP) over 2020. This forecast was already restated to a GDP 
loss of 4.5 percent. To put this number in perspective, global 
GDP was estimated at around 87.55 trillion U.S. dollars in 2019 – 
meaning that a 4.5 percent drop in economic growth results 
in almost 3.94 trillion U.S. dollars of lost economic output. 
https://www.statista.com/topics/6139/covid-19-impact-on-the-global-economy/

So whats the money garb? 

James McGinn schrieb am Freitag, 16. Juli 2021 um 06:52:15 UTC+2:
> Covid is just a big money grab.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#828762

FromMostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-24 18:44 -0700
Message-ID<4b1a2869-ec8f-475b-8b88-5032fd67ff6dn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#828760
The outlook for 2021 is positive, but I dont know whether 
this will materialize, Thailand and South Asia are locking 
down again because of Covid. 

Also if last year was -4%, then a 6% isn't that 
much discounted.

Description: Global growth is projected at 6% in 2021, 
moderating to 4.4% in 2022. The projections for 2021
 and 2022 are stronger than in the October 2020 WEO. 
The upward revision reflects additional fiscal support 
in a few large economies, the anticipated vaccine-powered 
recovery in the second half of 2021, and continued adaptation 
of economic activity to subdued mobility. High uncertainty 
surrounds this outlook, related to the path of the pandemic, 
the effectiveness of policy support to provide a bridge to 
vaccine-powered normalization, and the evolution of 
financial conditions. 
https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 25. Juli 2021 um 03:36:11 UTC+2:
> Sounds like James McGinn is a complete moron: 
> 
> While there is no way to tell exactly what the economic 
> damage from the global COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic 
> will be, there is widespread agreement among economists 
> that it will have severe negative impacts on the global 
> economy. Early estimates predicated that, should the 
> virus become a global pandemic, most major economies 
> will lose at least 2.9 percent of their gross domestic product 
> (GDP) over 2020. This forecast was already restated to a GDP 
> loss of 4.5 percent. To put this number in perspective, global 
> GDP was estimated at around 87.55 trillion U.S. dollars in 2019 – 
> meaning that a 4.5 percent drop in economic growth results 
> in almost 3.94 trillion U.S. dollars of lost economic output. 
> https://www.statista.com/topics/6139/covid-19-impact-on-the-global-economy/ 
> 
> So whats the money garb?
> James McGinn schrieb am Freitag, 16. Juli 2021 um 06:52:15 UTC+2: 
> > Covid is just a big money grab.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#828763

FromMostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-24 19:00 -0700
Message-ID<e2e6f829-92e7-46f1-8991-57c6ec0e9f90n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#828762
These communist planned cities seem not to be sustainable:

66 Reservoirs Discharging; Cities Severe Flooding | Many Dams Burst
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhgdgvyzk7A

Economic impact for 2021?

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 25. Juli 2021 um 03:44:20 UTC+2:
> The outlook for 2021 is positive, but I dont know whether 
> this will materialize, Thailand and South Asia are locking 
> down again because of Covid. 
> 
> Also if last year was -4%, then a 6% isn't that 
> much discounted. 
> 
> Description: Global growth is projected at 6% in 2021, 
> moderating to 4.4% in 2022. The projections for 2021 
> and 2022 are stronger than in the October 2020 WEO. 
> The upward revision reflects additional fiscal support 
> in a few large economies, the anticipated vaccine-powered 
> recovery in the second half of 2021, and continued adaptation 
> of economic activity to subdued mobility. High uncertainty 
> surrounds this outlook, related to the path of the pandemic, 
> the effectiveness of policy support to provide a bridge to 
> vaccine-powered normalization, and the evolution of 
> financial conditions. 
> https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 25. Juli 2021 um 03:36:11 UTC+2: 
> > Sounds like James McGinn is a complete moron: 
> > 
> > While there is no way to tell exactly what the economic 
> > damage from the global COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic 
> > will be, there is widespread agreement among economists 
> > that it will have severe negative impacts on the global 
> > economy. Early estimates predicated that, should the 
> > virus become a global pandemic, most major economies 
> > will lose at least 2.9 percent of their gross domestic product 
> > (GDP) over 2020. This forecast was already restated to a GDP 
> > loss of 4.5 percent. To put this number in perspective, global 
> > GDP was estimated at around 87.55 trillion U.S. dollars in 2019 – 
> > meaning that a 4.5 percent drop in economic growth results 
> > in almost 3.94 trillion U.S. dollars of lost economic output. 
> > https://www.statista.com/topics/6139/covid-19-impact-on-the-global-economy/ 
> > 
> > So whats the money garb? 
> > James McGinn schrieb am Freitag, 16. Juli 2021 um 06:52:15 UTC+2: 
> > > Covid is just a big money grab.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#828764

FromMostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-24 19:02 -0700
Message-ID<76adb197-1c76-4d0f-ac1a-dbb625499cb1n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#828763
Same in Germany:

Germany after the flooding | DW Documentary
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/f24rpz5A2HY

Europe isn't used to disasters like that, 
we usually don't have Tornados and stuff...

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 25. Juli 2021 um 04:00:15 UTC+2:
> These communist planned cities seem not to be sustainable: 
> 
> 66 Reservoirs Discharging; Cities Severe Flooding | Many Dams Burst 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhgdgvyzk7A 
> 
> Economic impact for 2021?
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 25. Juli 2021 um 03:44:20 UTC+2: 
> > The outlook for 2021 is positive, but I dont know whether 
> > this will materialize, Thailand and South Asia are locking 
> > down again because of Covid. 
> > 
> > Also if last year was -4%, then a 6% isn't that 
> > much discounted. 
> > 
> > Description: Global growth is projected at 6% in 2021, 
> > moderating to 4.4% in 2022. The projections for 2021 
> > and 2022 are stronger than in the October 2020 WEO. 
> > The upward revision reflects additional fiscal support 
> > in a few large economies, the anticipated vaccine-powered 
> > recovery in the second half of 2021, and continued adaptation 
> > of economic activity to subdued mobility. High uncertainty 
> > surrounds this outlook, related to the path of the pandemic, 
> > the effectiveness of policy support to provide a bridge to 
> > vaccine-powered normalization, and the evolution of 
> > financial conditions. 
> > https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO 
> > Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 25. Juli 2021 um 03:36:11 UTC+2: 
> > > Sounds like James McGinn is a complete moron: 
> > > 
> > > While there is no way to tell exactly what the economic 
> > > damage from the global COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic 
> > > will be, there is widespread agreement among economists 
> > > that it will have severe negative impacts on the global 
> > > economy. Early estimates predicated that, should the 
> > > virus become a global pandemic, most major economies 
> > > will lose at least 2.9 percent of their gross domestic product 
> > > (GDP) over 2020. This forecast was already restated to a GDP 
> > > loss of 4.5 percent. To put this number in perspective, global 
> > > GDP was estimated at around 87.55 trillion U.S. dollars in 2019 – 
> > > meaning that a 4.5 percent drop in economic growth results 
> > > in almost 3.94 trillion U.S. dollars of lost economic output. 
> > > https://www.statista.com/topics/6139/covid-19-impact-on-the-global-economy/ 
> > > 
> > > So whats the money garb? 
> > > James McGinn schrieb am Freitag, 16. Juli 2021 um 06:52:15 UTC+2: 
> > > > Covid is just a big money grab.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#828767

FromMostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-24 19:19 -0700
Message-ID<c4f98ed5-7388-4afe-b1b5-deedd6b5c0cbn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#828764
Where is Noah! Lets build an arc.

Belgium Flooded Again! Heavy floods hit the city of Dinant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBQo65fE7_k

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 25. Juli 2021 um 04:02:24 UTC+2:
> Same in Germany: 
> 
> Germany after the flooding | DW Documentary 
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/f24rpz5A2HY 
> 
> Europe isn't used to disasters like that, 
> we usually don't have Tornados and stuff...
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 25. Juli 2021 um 04:00:15 UTC+2: 
> > These communist planned cities seem not to be sustainable: 
> > 
> > 66 Reservoirs Discharging; Cities Severe Flooding | Many Dams Burst 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhgdgvyzk7A 
> > 
> > Economic impact for 2021? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#828788

FromClutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-25 09:48 -0500
Message-ID<sdjtku$efp$1@solani.org>
In reply to#828767
On 7/24/2021 9:19 PM, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> Where is Noah! Lets build an arc.

He comes when next ice age begins melting away.



-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827817

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2021-07-15 23:58 -0500
Message-ID<ilchvgFrickU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#827810
On 7/15/2021 10:23 PM, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> Covid is Fake
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg
> 
> Must you always choose cranks to follow?
> 
> https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm
> 
> https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt
> 
> https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html

Birds of a feather...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827818

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-15 22:26 -0700
Message-ID<44d53ced-8a50-4965-975d-5d4a5392ff4an@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827817
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:58:30 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> On 7/15/2021 10:23 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> >> Covid is Fake 
> >> 
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg 
> > 
> > Must you always choose cranks to follow? 
> > 
> > https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm 
> > 
> > https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt 
> > 
> > https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html
> Birds of a feather...

LOL.  You morons don't know how to identify a real scientist.

Real scientists deal with fact and details.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827819

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2021-07-16 00:58 -0500
Message-ID<ilclftFs6mfU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#827818
On 7/16/2021 12:26 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:58:30 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
>> On 7/15/2021 10:23 PM, Paul Alsing wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>>>> Covid is Fake
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg
>>>
>>> Must you always choose cranks to follow?
>>>
>>> https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm
>>>
>>> https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt
>>>
>>> https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html
>> Birds of a feather...
> 
> LOL.  You morons don't know how to identify a real scientist.
> 
> Real scientists deal with fact and details.

Changing topics, as you always seem to when dealt a losing hand...

Real(tm) scientists are published in peer reviewed journals.

The local dog catcher deals in fact and details. For scientists it is
the issue of quality not quantity. Speaking of which, you sure do spew
a lot, yielding a lovely example of empty barrels making the most noise.

All it takes, James, is to be great once and keep your mouth shut the
rest of the time. If you had something you wouldn't be in a position of
having to attempt to demonstrate your value all the time. The
interesting thing about greatness is that it is easily recognized
without a need to force it on people. The artifice you create is for the
purpose of convincing people you're something other than what you really
are. Funny that you're the only one who fails to recognize that fact.

Now that I've dealt with fact and details, am I a real scientist? No
more than the local dogcatcher. Dammit, even your definition of a "real 
scientist" is severely flawed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827820

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2021-07-15 23:36 -0700
Message-ID<24d284a8-728d-4297-baf6-bc72dd61e44an@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#827819
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 10:58:27 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> On 7/16/2021 12:26 AM, James McGinn wrote: 
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:58:30 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: 
> >> On 7/15/2021 10:23 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> >>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: 
> >>>> Covid is Fake 
> >>>> 
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg 
> >>> 
> >>> Must you always choose cranks to follow? 
> >>> 
> >>> https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm 
> >>> 
> >>> https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt 
> >>> 
> >>> https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html 
> >> Birds of a feather... 
> > 
> > LOL. You morons don't know how to identify a real scientist. 
> > 
> > Real scientists deal with fact and details.
> Changing topics, as you always seem to when dealt a losing hand... 
> 
> Real(tm) scientists are published in peer reviewed journals. 
> 
> The local dog catcher deals in fact and details. For scientists it is 
> the issue of quality not quantity. Speaking of which, you sure do spew 
> a lot, yielding a lovely example of empty barrels making the most noise. 
> 
> All it takes, James, is to be great once and keep your mouth shut the 
> rest of the time. If you had something you wouldn't be in a position of 
> having to attempt to demonstrate your value all the time. The 
> interesting thing about greatness is that it is easily recognized 
> without a need to force it on people. The artifice you create is for the 
> purpose of convincing people you're something other than what you really 
> are. Funny that you're the only one who fails to recognize that fact. 
> 
> Now that I've dealt with fact and details, am I a real scientist? No 
> more than the local dogcatcher. Dammit, even your definition of a "real 
> scientist" is severely flawed.

Real science involves real arguments.  Not character assassination.  You got nothing.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#827833

FromMichael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com>
Date2021-07-16 08:17 -0400
Message-ID<scrtc0$lbh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#827820
On 7/16/2021 2:36 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 10:58:27 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
>> On 7/16/2021 12:26 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 9:58:30 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
>>>> On 7/15/2021 10:23 PM, Paul Alsing wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:38:57 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>>>>>> Covid is Fake
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdh1okBYtfg
>>>>>
>>>>> Must you always choose cranks to follow?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.kwesthues.com/Rancourt09.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.laconiadailysun.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/john-ford-better-find-a-more-credible-source-for-argument-against-masks/article_3005ef4c-c1f4-11ea-9a41-a31c336c4b93.html
>>>> Birds of a feather...
>>>
>>> LOL. You morons don't know how to identify a real scientist.

I can certainly identify a "not_a_real_scientist". Guess what he is.

> Real science involves real arguments.  Not character assassination.  You got nothing.

Says the second biggest producer of character assassinations here. 
Second to Plutonium.  Great company you have there, James.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web