Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #833127 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-09-27 07:52 -0500 |
| Last post | 2021-09-28 05:21 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 420 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 07:52 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-09-27 13:18 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 08:32 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 09:40 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 15:01 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 11:17 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:57 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-09-27 20:42 +0200
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:49 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:20 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 08:24 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:49 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 09:09 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-27 20:21 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 23:30 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 13:01 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 11:34 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 19:31 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 15:55 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 21:53 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 04:08 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 22:54 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 01:59 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 06:31 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:13 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 08:15 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 15:34 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 21:10 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 23:16 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 08:20 -0600
BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 07:38 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:33 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:35 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 13:13 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:26 +0000
I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 06:36 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 08:23 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-30 09:33 -0500
Dilbert.COM Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 07:47 -0700
Re: Dilbert.COM RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-30 11:21 -0400
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:40 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-01 06:19 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 12:51 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 08:05 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:18 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:20 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 02:24 +0000
I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 09:46 -0700
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:19 +0000
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:12 -0700
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:11 -0600
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:26 +0100
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 10:54 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:32 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:51 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:06 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 16:28 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 21:09 -0600
## is a godsend. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 21:29 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 01:52 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 10:56 +0000
"z1.CPP" ain't no "Dilbert.COM".OopsOops Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 08:57 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 12:59 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 11:31 -0600
Improving "z1.CPP" is a pure joy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:24 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: ## is a godsend. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 19:35 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:15 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 11:11 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 16:43 +0000
"Dilbert.COM" has to be "readable". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:48 -0700
Re: "Dilbert.COM" has to be "readable". rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:21 -0600
How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:40 -0700
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 00:44 +0100
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 01:42 -0500
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:36 +0000
The Covid cult liberated me from my shackles. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 09:18 -0700
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:32 +0000
Re: "Dilbert.COM" has to be "readable". Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 14:56 -0400
My code was forked. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 12:03 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:18 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 00:46 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 21:34 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:28 +0000
No one here cares about what my code actually *does*. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 20:27 -0700
Re: No one here cares about what my code actually *does*. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 10:40 +0100
One huge routine. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:17 -0700
Re: One huge routine. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 16:45 +0000
Max sucks dicks. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 10:04 -0700
Re: Max sucks dicks. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:27 +0000
Re: One huge routine. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:27 -0600
Re: One huge routine. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:30 +0000
Re: One huge routine. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 15:30 -0500
Macros & Muscle Memory keep it simple. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 13:47 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-01 16:15 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 16:55 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:00 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 13:04 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 11:43 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 21:35 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 08:09 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 12:42 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 21:15 -0600
Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 21:36 -0700
Re: Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 05:04 +0000
Re: Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-02 06:44 -0500
Re: Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:05 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:03 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:07 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 08:56 +0100
"Permies" aren't script kiddies. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:10 -0700
Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:29 +0100
People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:40 -0700
Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 16:45 +0000
Cheating. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:55 -0700
Re: Cheating. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-02 13:30 -0500
Your "Up" is my "Down". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:45 -0700
Re: Cheating. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-02 15:32 -0400
Re: Cheating. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-02 14:43 -0500
Me, my daughter, and my son. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 16:50 -0500
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-02 16:51 -0500
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:36 +0000
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-02 22:17 -0400
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 03:26 +0100
My kids were born blonde and blue-eyed. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 13:03 -0700
Re: My kids were born blonde and blue-eyed. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:34 +0000
I was blonde, when younger. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 20:21 -0700
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 04:50 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 00:16 -0500
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:34 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:04 -0500
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:11 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 18:31 -0500
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:53 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 13:42 -0500
Tell me you don't like "Former U.S.S.R." girls of Nordic origin ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 12:08 -0700
Re: Tell me you don't like "Former U.S.S.R." girls of Nordic origin ! Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 19:10 -0500
Re: Tell me you don't like "Former U.S.S.R." girls of Nordic origin ! Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-03 21:35 -0400
Re: Tell me you don't like "Former U.S.S.R." girls of Nordic origin ! Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 22:46 -0500
Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 21:13 -0700
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 23:37 -0500
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-04 03:38 -0400
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 14:02 -0500
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-04 19:26 -0400
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 20:19 -0500
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-04 22:18 -0400
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 21:39 -0500
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 21:35 -0500
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-05 11:53 -0400
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 12:31 -0500
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-05 13:57 -0400
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-05 13:10 -0500
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 16:06 -0500
Re: Organisms pick & choose from the DNA smorgasbord. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-05 13:06 -0500
Re: Tell me you don't like "Former U.S.S.R." girls of Nordic origin ! Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-04 03:25 -0400
Re: Cheating. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:25 +0000
I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 20:14 -0700
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 23:26 -0500
Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 21:45 -0700
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 04:51 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 00:18 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:35 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:10 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:13 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-03 19:52 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:03 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-03 20:18 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:32 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-03 20:39 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> - 2021-10-03 21:21 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:48 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:46 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-03 19:53 -0400
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 18:33 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:54 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 01:05 -0500
Seattle hates smokers with a deep passion. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 09:09 -0700
Re: Seattle hates smokers with a deep passion. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 12:18 -0600
Seattle's not big on tolerance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Seattle hates smokers with a deep passion. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:18 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 12:03 -0600
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 21:46 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 11:55 -0600
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 11:50 +0100
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:55 +0000
TFZ is better then Face-To-Face sex. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 09:41 -0700
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 19:01 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 04:49 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 00:15 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:34 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:01 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:10 +0000
Life is everything, yet nothing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 12:17 -0700
Re: Life is everything, yet nothing. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:00 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 18:30 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:52 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 11:56 +0100
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Ayaz Siddiqi <ayaz.s.siddiqi@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 07:16 -0700
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:14 -0500
Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 13:33 -0500
The loans-to-deposits ratio is insane, nothing a banker would want. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 11:56 -0700
Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 19:55 -0600
Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 11:35 -0600
My work got done joyously. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:28 -0700
Re: My work got done joyously. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:31 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:44 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:50 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:55 -0600
Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 12:15 -0700
Re: Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:33 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 17:35 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 22:08 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 00:12 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 11:47 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 11:49 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 20:02 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 19:47 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 23:50 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 07:54 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 00:08 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 05:12 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 01:51 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 06:56 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 13:28 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 20:18 +0000
Needle hungry people. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-05 12:01 -0700
Re: Needle hungry people. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 20:33 +0000
Re: Needle hungry people. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 15:57 -0500
Re: Needle hungry people. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-06 07:05 -0500
Re: Needle hungry people. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-06 11:00 -0500
Re: Needle hungry people. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-06 13:50 -0400
Re: Needle hungry people. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-06 13:12 -0500
Re: Needle hungry people. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-10-06 21:47 -0700
Re: Needle hungry people. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-07 12:02 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 07:59 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 13:15 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:07 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 22:11 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 17:47 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:37 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 18:58 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-09-30 18:26 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:57 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:19 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-01 19:22 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:37 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:16 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:44 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:49 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 09:38 -0500
10 instances of my "C/C++ console" running simultaneously. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 07:51 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:08 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-09-30 11:55 -0400
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 11:23 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-09-30 13:48 -0400
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 16:45 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 19:40 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 21:16 -0600
Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 01:31 -0700
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 13:31 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:38 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:28 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 02:55 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 15:14 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:31 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 16:56 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:50 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 17:05 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 22:42 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 18:05 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 00:18 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 20:10 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 01:12 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 22:31 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 03:34 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 22:54 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 03:57 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 23:10 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 09:22 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 12:37 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 20:26 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-05 20:15 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 22:22 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-05 21:47 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-06 11:02 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-05 07:54 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 12:45 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-05 20:17 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 22:12 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 20:13 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 02:21 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 21:35 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 03:56 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 23:53 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 09:23 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 13:11 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 20:30 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 16:37 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-05 21:43 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 18:35 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-06 00:07 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-05 20:24 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 22:09 -0500
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 20:43 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:57 +0000
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 20:28 -0600
Re: Every cult begins with a shaky premise. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 18:13 -0500
You don't have to explain speed to me, Clutterfreak. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 16:28 -0700
Re: You don't have to explain speed to me, Clutterfreak. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 17:39 -0500
When the walls fall, the wars start. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 17:56 -0700
Two 20 year-olds, sleeping together. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 18:51 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 15:02 -0500
I'm 49 % introvert & 51 % extrovert. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 17:36 -0700
Re: I'm 49 % introvert & 51 % extrovert. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 19:58 -0500
How is it that Google Groups gets it right ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 17:17 -0700
Re: How is it that Google Groups gets it right ?! Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 21:02 -0500
Phy_Regs does what _I_ want, not what you want. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 19:17 -0700
Re: Phy_Regs does what _I_ want, not what you want. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 01:58 -0500
Re: Phy_Regs does what _I_ want, not what you want. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-01 03:23 -0400
Re: Phy_Regs does what _I_ want, not what you want. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 02:59 -0500
Re: Phy_Regs does what _I_ want, not what you want. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 03:09 -0500
Borrowing a "Subject:" line. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 01:47 -0700
I created Phy_Regs about 10 years ago, not yesterday. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 01:04 -0700
Re: Phy_Regs does what _I_ want, not what you want. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-01 12:22 -0400
Re: How is it that Jeff Relf gets it wrong?! Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-10-01 11:50 -0400
Thunderbird can be made to run "right" ( however you want it ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 08:03 -0700
Re: Thunderbird can be made to run "right" ( however you want it ). Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:14 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2021-09-30 10:36 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-09-30 18:25 +0000
FORTH, C & C++, in that order, have advantages. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 16:16 -0700
Re: FORTH, C & C++, in that order, have advantages. ivan <ivan@mail.ru> - 2021-10-05 14:00 +0200
FORTH is close to the metal & has stood the test of time. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-05 11:02 -0700
Re: FORTH is close to the metal & has stood the test of time. Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2021-10-05 18:23 +0000
Postfix notation. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-06 09:46 -0700
Re: Postfix notation. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-06 12:02 -0500
Re: Postfix notation. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-06 12:57 -0500
BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-06 12:40 -0700
Re: BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-06 15:27 -0500
Re: BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-06 20:26 -0500
Clutterfreak's "mind". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-06 18:55 -0700
Re: Clutterfreak's "mind". Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-06 21:08 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2021-09-30 19:52 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 21:18 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 08:07 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 15:26 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 19:59 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 12:04 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 10:57 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 12:01 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 20:04 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 15:03 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:48 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:39 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:11 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 20:29 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 17:56 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 21:00 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 12:03 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 08:06 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 20:23 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:11 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:21 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:13 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:42 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:46 -0600
while(1) Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:56 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 14:51 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 21:22 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 15:07 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:27 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:14 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 08:02 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 15:09 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 19:48 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 00:37 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 11:57 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 11:55 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 11:55 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 06:25 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 11:50 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 19:40 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-09-30 01:43 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 07:48 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-29 23:53 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 12:06 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 07:49 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 11:37 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 09:36 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 09:37 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-27 09:25 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-27 09:50 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 18:33 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-27 11:55 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:43 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-27 14:51 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 17:05 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 21:31 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 12:57 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-09-28 19:03 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:38 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 21:44 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 22:50 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 13:00 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-27 20:27 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 19:29 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 23:22 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 07:42 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2021-09-27 14:31 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 05:21 +0000
Page 18 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-05 18:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: FORTH is close to the metal & has stood the test of time. |
| Message-ID | <sji56q$p0d$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #833783 |
On 2021-10-05, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> You ("ivan") replied ( to me ):
>> > FORTH, C & C++, in that order, have advantages.
>>
>> why FORTH
>
> FORTH is close to the metal & has stood the test of time.
Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin'
Into the future
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEVmaShI0Z0>
> Change the extension of a .PDF file to .TXT &
> you'll see PostScript, a FORTH variant.
Weak ;)
> That alone makes it more ubiquitous than JavaScript.
"All your are base belong to us" - (written by the author of TypeScript?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-06 09:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Postfix notation. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.6--9.46am.Seattle.2021> |
| In reply to | #833783 |
You (DFS) replied ( to me ): > > FORTH is close to the metal & has stood the test of time. > > PostScript, a FORTH variant. > > No. "Although the Design System language and its successors bear a > superficial resemblance to the FORTH programming language, their > conception and development were entirely independent of FORTH." > https://archive.org/details/postscriptlangua00adob/page/n7/mode/2up Fine, postfix notation is closer to how computers actually work, behind the scenes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-06 12:02 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Postfix notation. |
| Message-ID | <lclrlgd7pu33p8b6a8cg95g6niiih404do@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #833843 |
>> https://archive.org/details/postscriptlangua00adob/page/n7/mode/2up What a tease! They allow you to read a few pages only (without signing up or something). I was ready to geek-out and read all about postscript! -- "Why would I engage in in-depth debates when I can post 8 flames/insults and anti-Linux rhetoric in the same time period?" - some dumb fsck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-06 12:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Postfix notation. |
| Message-ID | <sjko1i$39i$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #833843 |
On 10/6/2021 11:46 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > You (DFS) replied ( to me ): >>> FORTH is close to the metal & has stood the test of time. >>> PostScript, a FORTH variant. >> >> No. "Although the Design System language and its successors bear a >> superficial resemblance to the FORTH programming language, their >> conception and development were entirely independent of FORTH." >> https://archive.org/details/postscriptlangua00adob/page/n7/mode/2up > > Fine, postfix notation is closer to how computers actually work, > behind the scenes. > "14 day loan required to access EPUB and PDF files." Talking about bad habits. They have to pay us to read and use that book! Lot's of bad habits in this nation. If I spend one minute in usenet, it's been for charity. Otherwise you'd have to pay! Don't forget that. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-06 12:40 -0700 |
| Subject | BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.6--0.40pm.Seattle.2021> |
| In reply to | #833849 |
Clutterfreak: > If I spend one minute on usenet, it's been for charity. We don't need you to tell us how evil White people are; BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-06 15:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first. |
| Message-ID | <is6f5oFf2upU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #833863 |
On 10/6/2021 2:40 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Clutterfreak: >> If I spend one minute on usenet, it's been for charity. > > We don't need you to tell us how evil White people are; > BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first. Could Ckutterfreak be narcissistic? His statement above sure sounds like it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-06 20:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first. |
| Message-ID | <sjlicd$oik$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #833863 |
On 10/6/2021 2:40 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > We don't need you to tell us how evil White people are Why would you say something like that. I said your code was substandard. That doesn't mean you're quite evil. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-06 18:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Clutterfreak's "mind". |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.6--6.55pm.Seattle.2021> |
| In reply to | #833875 |
You (Clutterfreak) replied ( to me ): > > We don't need you to tell us how evil White people are > > BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first. > > Why would you say something like that. The failings of white people is thee only topic on your "mind". > I said your code was substandard. Based on what, pure ignorance ? You don't know what the object code does & you can't read the source code.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-06 21:08 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Clutterfreak's "mind". |
| Message-ID | <sjlkqp$ovo$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #833880 |
On 10/6/2021 8:55 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > You (Clutterfreak) replied ( to me ): >>> We don't need you to tell us how evil White people are >>> BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment did it first. >> >> Why would you say something like that. > > The failings of white people is thee only topic on your "mind". > >> I said your code was substandard. > > Based on what, pure ignorance ? > > You don't know what the object code does & > you can't read the source code. > The only topic on my mind? No I have many other scientific interests. What am I ignorant about as far as your code is concerned? Do I need to understand it? Its output shows it's got bugs. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-30 19:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. |
| Message-ID | <sj5m40$10ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #833357 |
On 9/30/2021 1:25 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: > On 2021-09-30, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >> I think in FORTH & program in C/C++; >> naturally, people freak out when they see my source code. > You are just advanced, but make mistake. C and C++ are not > languages for advanced :P > You guessed it FOrth is one of THEM :P > nope, FORTH is DOA, no way to troubleshoot it, its a stack machine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-30 21:18 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. |
| Message-ID | <irnd0oFi2e2U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #833357 |
On 09/30/2021 12:25 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: > On 2021-09-30, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >> I think in FORTH & program in C/C++; >> naturally, people freak out when they see my source code. > You are just advanced, but make mistake. C and C++ are not > languages for advanced :P > You guessed it FOrth is one of THEM :P > Probably misquoting slightly but Stroustrup on C++ 'It makes it difficult to shoot yourself in the foot. When you do, you blow your entire leg off.'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 08:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <irja8aFonjiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #833245 |
On 09/29/2021 05:31 AM, chrisv wrote: > Clutterfreak wrote: > >> So Commodore 64, it looks like, was already "vintage" in 1989. After I >> acquired the Commodores I began frequenting a computer assignment store >> that sold people's old and new stuff and kept 30% of the money and gave >> 70% to owners. It was a heaven for "vintage" parts, systems, manuals, >> books, everything. > > Cool! > >> I had found a funky half-finished C manual there in >> German coming with two disks for Commodore. That's how I learned C. In >> school everybody used Fortran in science depts and PL-1 in business depts. > > My college programming classes used Pascal. EE curriculum. > I loved Pascal. The University of Maine used it for a didactic language and many of the new engineering hires used it. I made some bucks writing dll's so Pascal could talk to real world instrumentation, robotic arms, and so forth. The original, pure design by Wirth was characterized as 'a computer language only good for telling itself secrets' .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 15:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sj1t2g$c5$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #833250 |
On 29/09/2021 15:07, rbowman wrote: > On 09/29/2021 05:31 AM, chrisv wrote: >> Clutterfreak wrote: >> >>> So Commodore 64, it looks like, was already "vintage" in 1989. After I >>> acquired the Commodores I began frequenting a computer assignment store >>> that sold people's old and new stuff and kept 30% of the money and gave >>> 70% to owners. It was a heaven for "vintage" parts, systems, manuals, >>> books, everything. >> >> Cool! >> >>> I had found a funky half-finished C manual there in >>> German coming with two disks for Commodore. That's how I learned C. In >>> school everybody used Fortran in science depts and PL-1 in business >>> depts. >> >> My college programming classes used Pascal. EE curriculum. >> > > I loved Pascal. The University of Maine used it for a didactic language > and many of the new engineering hires used it. I made some bucks writing > dll's so Pascal could talk to real world instrumentation, robotic arms, > and so forth. > > The original, pure design by Wirth was characterized as 'a computer > language only good for telling itself secrets' . It was rubbish for real world stuff. You had to compromise it to do anything. C was designed from the outset to be useful, and I still revere it, with all its shortcomings. On a small memory machine it is absolutely the bees knees. -- Those who want slavery should have the grace to name it by its proper name. They must face the full meaning of that which they are advocating or condoning; the full, exact, specific meaning of collectivism, of its logical implications, of the principles upon which it is based, and of the ultimate consequences to which these principles will lead. They must face it, then decide whether this is what they want or not. Ayn Rand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 19:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <irkjvbF1r5eU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #833253 |
On 09/29/2021 08:26 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 29/09/2021 15:07, rbowman wrote: >> On 09/29/2021 05:31 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> Clutterfreak wrote: >>> >>>> So Commodore 64, it looks like, was already "vintage" in 1989. After I >>>> acquired the Commodores I began frequenting a computer assignment store >>>> that sold people's old and new stuff and kept 30% of the money and gave >>>> 70% to owners. It was a heaven for "vintage" parts, systems, manuals, >>>> books, everything. >>> >>> Cool! >>> >>>> I had found a funky half-finished C manual there in >>>> German coming with two disks for Commodore. That's how I learned C. In >>>> school everybody used Fortran in science depts and PL-1 in business >>>> depts. >>> >>> My college programming classes used Pascal. EE curriculum. >>> >> >> I loved Pascal. The University of Maine used it for a didactic >> language and many of the new engineering hires used it. I made some >> bucks writing dll's so Pascal could talk to real world >> instrumentation, robotic arms, and so forth. >> >> The original, pure design by Wirth was characterized as 'a computer >> language only good for telling itself secrets' . > > It was rubbish for real world stuff. You had to compromise it to do > anything. C was designed from the outset to be useful, and I still > revere it, with all its shortcomings. On a small memory machine it is > absolutely the bees knees. > > When I put BDS C on my Osborne 1 I was in tall cotton. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDS_C https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_1 When I'd go into a client's site they would have some sort of weird lashup and crappy tools. With the Osborne I had all my assemblers, compilers, editors, and so forth ready to go in a portable environment. Well, sort of portable. It was 25 pounds but I was younger then. I even did a hardware hack to use the parallel port to burn EPROMs. It paid back the $1800 many times over. The Osborne Executive fizzled but when the Boston Globe was selling theirs as they migrated to PC's I bought 2.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-30 12:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sj45jk$spr$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #833296 |
On 30/09/2021 02:59, rbowman wrote: > On 09/29/2021 08:26 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 29/09/2021 15:07, rbowman wrote: >>> On 09/29/2021 05:31 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>> Clutterfreak wrote: >>>> >>>>> So Commodore 64, it looks like, was already "vintage" in 1989. After I >>>>> acquired the Commodores I began frequenting a computer assignment >>>>> store >>>>> that sold people's old and new stuff and kept 30% of the money and >>>>> gave >>>>> 70% to owners. It was a heaven for "vintage" parts, systems, manuals, >>>>> books, everything. >>>> >>>> Cool! >>>> >>>>> I had found a funky half-finished C manual there in >>>>> German coming with two disks for Commodore. That's how I learned C. In >>>>> school everybody used Fortran in science depts and PL-1 in business >>>>> depts. >>>> >>>> My college programming classes used Pascal. EE curriculum. >>>> >>> >>> I loved Pascal. The University of Maine used it for a didactic >>> language and many of the new engineering hires used it. I made some >>> bucks writing dll's so Pascal could talk to real world >>> instrumentation, robotic arms, and so forth. >>> >>> The original, pure design by Wirth was characterized as 'a computer >>> language only good for telling itself secrets' . >> >> It was rubbish for real world stuff. You had to compromise it to do >> anything. C was designed from the outset to be useful, and I still >> revere it, with all its shortcomings. On a small memory machine it is >> absolutely the bees knees. >> >> > > When I put BDS C on my Osborne 1 I was in tall cotton. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDS_C > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_1 > > When I'd go into a client's site they would have some sort of weird > lashup and crappy tools. With the Osborne I had all my assemblers, > compilers, editors, and so forth ready to go in a portable environment. > Well, sort of portable. It was 25 pounds but I was younger then. I even > did a hardware hack to use the parallel port to burn EPROMs. It paid > back the $1800 many times over. > > The Osborne Executive fizzled but when the Boston Globe was selling > theirs as they migrated to PC's I bought 2. > > I learnt C initially with BDS C and CP/M -- For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery. Jonathan Swift
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 10:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8j29lg5kteuqhn9o9ophsgfp7afi7o2894@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #833250 |
rbowman wrote: > chrisv wrote: >> >> My college programming classes used Pascal. EE curriculum. > >I loved Pascal. The University of Maine used it for a didactic language >and many of the new engineering hires used it. I made some bucks writing >dll's so Pascal could talk to real world instrumentation, robotic arms, >and so forth. > >The original, pure design by Wirth was characterized as 'a computer >language only good for telling itself secrets' . I can't say that I've met a programming language that I didn't like. I probably should have gotten a job programming, because I've always enjoyed doing it. Programming with Pascal was certainly a good learning experience. I'd done a lot of programming previously (even for a living), mostly in BASIC. But I really learned how to program "correctly" (well structured, etc) in college with Pascal. -- "ALL non-idiots support the use of testing over compile-time warnings to determine if the code functions correctly. You're one of the few idiots who thinks otherwise." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 12:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sj2655$ipg$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #833255 |
On 9/29/2021 10:57 AM, chrisv wrote: > I can't say that I've met a programming language that I didn't like. I don't like javascript. Period. It's got real problems. By the time it was developed, programming languages had migrated from creators who were essentially scientists to two-bit little "engineers" who'd packed those desk jobs by then, creating newer ones. Complements of Reagan era. To this day all real businesses are run by programming languages that were already invented before the wave of "Engineers" arrived and fucked everything up. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 20:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sj2dbh$5nm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #833259 |
On 29/09/2021 18:01, Clutterfreak wrote: > On 9/29/2021 10:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >> I can't say that I've met a programming language that I didn't like. > > > I don't like javascript. Period. It's got real problems. By the time it > was developed, programming languages had migrated from creators who were > essentially scientists to two-bit little "engineers" who'd packed those > desk jobs by then, creating newer ones. Complements of Reagan era. > Er no, wriong way around programming languages had migrated from creators who were essentially engineers to two-bit little "computer science-tits who'd packed those desk jobs by then, creating newer ones. > To this day all real businesses are run by programming languages that > were already invented before the wave of "Engineers" arrived and fucked > everything up. > C was written by engineers and mathematicians Assembler was written by engineers COBOL was written by a mathematician C++ was written by a computer scientist. Java was written by computer scientists as was Javascript The worst person to employ in IT is a computer scientist. The best people are mathematicians and software engineers. -- To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 15:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sj2gq9$ljp$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #833269 |
On 9/29/2021 2:04 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 29/09/2021 18:01, Clutterfreak wrote: >> On 9/29/2021 10:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> I can't say that I've met a programming language that I didn't like. >> >> >> I don't like javascript. Period. It's got real problems. By the time >> it was developed, programming languages had migrated from creators who >> were essentially scientists to two-bit little "engineers" who'd packed >> those desk jobs by then, creating newer ones. Complements of Reagan era. >> > Er no, wriong way around programming languages had migrated from > creators who were essentially engineers to two-bit little "computer > science-tits who'd packed those desk jobs by then, creating newer ones. > >> To this day all real businesses are run by programming languages that >> were already invented before the wave of "Engineers" arrived and >> fucked everything up. >> > C was written by engineers and mathematicians > Assembler was written by engineers > COBOL was written by a mathematician > C++ was written by a computer scientist. > Java was written by computer scientists as was Javascript > > The worst person to employ in IT is a computer scientist. > The best people are mathematicians and software engineers. > I (and I suppose Chrisv as well) was talking about programming languages, not something whose little ass is tied to "web browsers". What's "web browsing" and web itself got to do with programming? As a programming language javascript sucks. It's truly just for "engineers." Google is not run by "chrome" :-( It is run by computers with C++ codes running on them round the clock. Google is absolutely helpless with anything other than C++. The moment they use one of "Engineers"' funky choices instead, they'd have to enlarge the size and number of buildings they keep the computers in by at least a factor of 10 because they'd have to increase the number of computers by a factor of 10 :-( Even Google cannot afford that. Programming has been around since 1940s. It feeds on the need to compute solutions to scientific problems. Web browsing is something totally unrelated that began in 1990s so malodorous teenagers with their dicks in their hands could find porn with :) Yeah you need "engineers" for that side of realities. Hahaha :) Well, programming I guess means different things to different people. When I looked into javascript some 20 years back it was pure shit as a programming language. I don't know what it is today and I don't even want to know. But back then it was lunacy, pure masochism, to use javascript to program. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 20:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <irkmr4F2b21U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #833278 |
On 09/29/2021 02:03 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: > Well, programming I guess means different things to different people. > When I looked into javascript some 20 years back it was pure shit as a > programming language. I don't know what it is today and I don't even > want to know. But back then it was lunacy, pure masochism, to use > javascript to program. > And then came node.js... Given a choice of IIS, Apache, or node for a web server I'll take node any day for quick and dirty, nginx for serious work. You may not like it and I may not like it, but browsers, Android, and iOS is where it's at.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 18 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web