Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #723423 > unrolled thread

Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material

Started bymitchrae3323@gmail.com
First post2019-01-14 17:34 -0800
Last post2019-01-18 12:31 -0800
Articles 11 on this page of 31 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-14 17:34 -0800
    Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-14 21:59 -0800
      Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 10:55 -0800
        Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 17:16 -0800
          Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 19:32 -0800
            Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 19:47 -0800
              Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 20:39 -0800
                Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 20:50 -0800
                  Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 21:08 -0800
                    Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-15 21:22 -0800
                      Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-16 14:19 -0800
                        Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-16 14:43 -0800
                        Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 22:47 +0000
                          Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 21:11 -0800
                            Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-16 21:59 -0800
                            Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 04:47 -0500
                          Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-17 09:12 -0600
                    Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 21:16 -0800
                      Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-16 09:33 -0800
                      Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-16 20:41 -0800
                        Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-16 21:57 -0800
                        Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 10:08 -0800
                          Einstein ignored the Nobel committee, and vice versa. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-17 15:40 -0800
                            Re: Einstein ignored the Nobel committee, and vice versa. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-17 15:44 -0800
                    Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-16 23:47 +0000
      Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 11:19 -0800
        Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-15 12:13 -0800
        Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-15 12:55 -0800
          Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-01-17 04:25 -0800
    Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 12:25 -0800
      Re: Pure gravity field... Where there is No Material mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 12:31 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#723654

Frompnalsing@gmail.com
Date2019-01-16 21:57 -0800
Message-ID<07a13f25-2805-4f4e-b884-a14dd1cfb33b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#723647
On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 8:41:24 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 9:36:17 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 9:09:04 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > > I have a better force theory than the establishment.
> > 
> > No, Mitch, you do not. You may think you do, but it is just a figment of your overactive imagination. If you had such a theory you would have evidence to provide, but you don't.
> > 
> > Science has rules that must be followed, you don't get to make up your own rules, that's not how it works. Either provide the proper evidence or get lost.
> 
> I will remember you when everyone knows you are wrong
> about my real math and science Nobel wins. God creates gravity.

That's fine, Mitch, you go ahead and remember me, after your 'real math' wins the Nobel... of course, you have presented no math at all here!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723686

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-17 10:08 -0800
Message-ID<c8b126a8-9bc1-4e06-8619-b2abbeb2f7c1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#723647
On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 8:41:24 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 9:36:17 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 9:09:04 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > > I have a better force theory than the establishment.
> > 
> > No, Mitch, you do not. You may think you do, but it is just a figment of your overactive imagination. If you had such a theory you would have evidence to provide, but you don't.
> > 
> > Science has rules that must be followed, you don't get to make up your own rules, that's not how it works. Either provide the proper evidence or get lost.
> 
> I will remember you when everyone knows you are wrong
> about my real math and science Nobel wins. God creates gravity.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch

Only your God can give you a Nobel.Mitch we know you to be a low wit that has been brain washed.Your fear of God did it all.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723727 — Einstein ignored the Nobel committee, and vice versa.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2019-01-17 15:40 -0800
SubjectEinstein ignored the Nobel committee, and vice versa.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.17--3.40pm.Seattle.2019>
In reply to#723686
> > my real math and science Nobel wins.  God creates gravity.
> 
> Only your God can give you a Nobel.

Einstein ignored the Nobel committee, and vice versa.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723728 — Re: Einstein ignored the Nobel committee, and vice versa.

Frommitchrae3323@gmail.com
Date2019-01-17 15:44 -0800
SubjectRe: Einstein ignored the Nobel committee, and vice versa.
Message-ID<2130ee7b-b26d-4b01-b815-66bb068150e7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#723727
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:40:11 PM UTC-8, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > > my real math and science Nobel wins.  God creates gravity.
> > 
> > Only your God can give you a Nobel.
> 
> Einstein ignored the Nobel committee, and vice versa.

I got past that...

God creates gravity.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723619

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2019-01-16 23:47 +0000
Message-ID<q1ofpk$g3r$2@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#723558
mitchrae3323@gmail.com writes:

>approval from education. I don't need education
>and I have the Nobel Prize.

Oh really! What year and what was the prize awarded for?
And what name did you use? Apparently not "Mitchell Raemsch".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723487

Fromporaty6@gmail.com
Date2019-01-15 11:19 -0800
Message-ID<b291b8c9-67a7-4460-918d-d1fbaf4c5330@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#723446
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 8:00:01 AM UTC+2, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/14/2019 5:34 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > In the Gravity field where there is no matter.
> 
> The gravitational field lines created by a mass
======================
indeed   created    by mass
that s right  





 extend forever, 
> throughout the plane?
=====
???
not clear   ?
which plane ??
==
TIA
Y.P
=====================

 
> > Matterless portion of the gravity field.
> > 
> > The immaterial is nonmatter.
> > Of course there is always some matter in
> > the gravity field. The rest is empty.
> >
===
better and simpler  say 
the matter is creating the gravity field !
==
TIA
Y.P
============
> >

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723494

Frommitchrae3323@gmail.com
Date2019-01-15 12:13 -0800
Message-ID<2620003a-eb9c-4151-be34-620c4fd18e0b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#723487
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 11:19:33 AM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 8:00:01 AM UTC+2, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 1/14/2019 5:34 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > In the Gravity field where there is no matter.
> > 
> > The gravitational field lines created by a mass
> ======================
> indeed   created    by mass
> that s right  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  extend forever, 
> > throughout the plane?
> =====
> ???
> not clear   ?
> which plane ??
> ==
> TIA
> Y.P
> =====================
> 
>  
> > > Matterless portion of the gravity field.
> > > 
> > > The immaterial is nonmatter.
> > > Of course there is always some matter in
> > > the gravity field. The rest is empty.
> > >
> ===
> better and simpler  say 
> the matter is creating the gravity field !
> ==
> TIA
> Y.P
> ============
> > >

Porat? What about the empty sides of the field?
No. God is creating that.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723508

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com>
Date2019-01-15 12:55 -0800
Message-ID<q1lhbl$97m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#723487
On 1/15/2019 11:19 AM, poraty6@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 8:00:01 AM UTC+2, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 1/14/2019 5:34 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In the Gravity field where there is no matter.
>>
>> The gravitational field lines created by a mass
> ======================
> indeed   created    by mass
> that s right

I think so.

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   extend forever,
>> throughout the plane?
> =====
> ???
> not clear   ?
> which plane ??

plane was the wrong word. Perhaps a better term would be the field lines 
extend out through the _volume_. Plane implies 2d, volume implies 3d. 
Here is a crude rendering of a 3d field contained in a volume using 
volumetric rendering:

https://plus.google.com/101799841244447089430/posts/7RRwAu9cxWw

https://plus.google.com/101799841244447089430/posts/PU1rRsaEUzK

[...]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723670

Fromporaty6@gmail.com
Date2019-01-17 04:25 -0800
Message-ID<b51e0b05-adf1-4b7d-8cd3-5ef3cb65b9e1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#723508
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 10:55:22 PM UTC+2, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/15/2019 11:19 AM, poraty6@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 8:00:01 AM UTC+2, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >> On 1/14/2019 5:34 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> In the Gravity field where there is no matter.
> >>
> >> The gravitational field lines created by a mass
> > ======================
> > indeed   created    by mass
> > that s right
> 
> I think so.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   extend forever,
> >> throughout the plane?
> > =====
> > ???
> > not clear   ?
> > which plane ??
> 
> plane was the wrong word. Perhaps a better term would be the field lines 
> extend out through the _volume_. Plane implies 2d, volume implies 3d. 
> Here is a crude rendering of a 3d field contained in a volume using 
> volumetric rendering:
> 
> https://plus.google.com/101799841244447089430/posts/7RRwAu9cxWw
> 
> https://plus.google.com/101799841244447089430/posts/PU1rRsaEUzK
> 
> [...]

============================
see as well :


http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

it its appendix
more than 25   years ago  there !!~


force lines   sourcing directly from mass !!!~
(the faraday experiment with  permanent magnet

is 'in line' with it !!



TIA
Y.Porat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723812

Frommitchrae3323@gmail.com
Date2019-01-18 12:25 -0800
Message-ID<95595fa6-ae65-4c15-8893-8e27a682b011@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#723423
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 5:34:55 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> In the Gravity field where there is no matter.
> 
> Matterless portion of the gravity field.
> 
> The immaterial is nonmatter.
> Of course there is always some matter in
> the gravity field. The rest is empty.
> 
> God creates gravity.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch

Atoms themselves are mostly empty inside.
The Inner of the light form is a double sin curve EM
of dual forces...
How can you beat double forces?
Mathematical God creates gravitations.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723813

Frommitchrae3323@gmail.com
Date2019-01-18 12:31 -0800
Message-ID<b03682e3-a4a9-477f-a8e9-bdbeacb47892@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#723812
On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 12:25:27 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 5:34:55 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > In the Gravity field where there is no matter.
> > 
> > Matterless portion of the gravity field.
> > 
> > The immaterial is nonmatter.
> > Of course there is always some matter in
> > the gravity field. The rest is empty.
> > 
> > God creates gravity.
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> Atoms themselves are mostly empty inside.
> The Inner of the light form is a double sin curve EM
> of dual forces...
> How can you beat double forces?
> Mathematical God creates gravitations.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch

Light is magnetic force with aether electric field.
What is the strength of those two forces
making up light?

I propose they have zero strength. Zero. Zilch...
That is better light theory.

Mathematical God creates gravitations.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web