Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #846109 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-02-24 11:06 -0800 |
| Last post | 2022-03-09 23:29 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 45 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-24 11:06 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2022-02-24 12:27 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2022-02-25 09:49 +1100
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-24 14:57 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-24 15:14 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Wi1liam T <willyt1955@yahooomail.com> - 2022-02-25 00:41 +0000
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-02-25 21:55 +0100
Russia jumped Ukraine & ButtFucked her live, on TV. "Dick's DriveIn" <Dicks@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2022-02-25 14:52 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-26 11:48 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-26 12:09 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-08 13:30 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-08 15:07 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-08 15:58 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-03-08 19:02 -0600
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Ayaz Siddiqi <ayaz.s.siddiqi@gmail.com> - 2022-03-08 22:20 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Egbert <gayrightistsx@yahoomail.com> - 2022-03-09 12:59 +0000
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-09 11:08 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Egbert <gayrightistsx@yahoomail.com> - 2022-03-10 12:40 +0000
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-03-10 12:59 -0600
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Egbert <gayrightistsx@yahoomail.com> - 2022-03-11 01:32 +0000
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-10 21:29 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Egbert <gayrightistsx@yahoomail.com> - 2022-03-11 18:36 +0000
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-09 16:41 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2022-03-10 05:37 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-10 09:36 -0500
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-03-11 03:15 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2022-03-11 04:17 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-03-11 04:35 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2022-03-11 06:08 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-11 11:28 -0500
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-03-11 12:52 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-12 12:29 -0500
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-12 12:24 -0500
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 14:50 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-12 21:22 -0500
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 19:52 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-10 11:57 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-13 16:54 -0700
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 06:17 -0700
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 06:32 -0700
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 06:51 -0700
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2022-03-15 05:50 -0700
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-12 11:42 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2022-03-09 12:03 -0800
Re: What's it all about, Ukraine Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2022-03-09 23:29 -0800
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-24 11:06 -0800 |
| Subject | What's it all about, Ukraine |
| Message-ID | <8skf1h9du6hk1eigqvvscot55en97vg7fv@4ax.com> |
What's it all about, Ukraine... It's all Albert Einstein's doing. It's about atomic bombs. Albert Einstein said that what is needed is to put atomic bombs pointing to places like Russia. The Ukraine guy said if i cannot be part of NATO then I will put atomic bombs pointing at Russia. Russia said, "I cannot have that." So, Russia needed to grab Ukraine before it happens. (Russia won't invade Ukraine if they have atomic bombs pointing at them) Yous certainty didn't want Cuba have atom bombs pointing at yous in USA. ... Now China (with it's cats eyes) is eyeing the USA like a cat looks at a mouse. also notice how quiet Israel is... but watch out for the cat. There's a PUSSY in the White House, everyone wants to fuck dat pussy! You certainty don't want 3 more years of a pussy in the whitey house. You won't recognize the earth in 3 years. Start changing the maps around. Mexico will have an atomic bomb pointing at the USA soon... I'm going to have to start a Russian dating service! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-24 12:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4db14ed2-d379-4fb1-82ca-22ccc0650ddcn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #846109 |
Sheldon Glashow,sickfuck Pennino spam filling sci.physics just to hog the front page, CSUN Erika D. Beck, Adriana Ocampo, Scott J. Horowitz, William Karush, Lorraine Foster, Olympia LePoint, as McGinn & Pennino spam sci.physics every day, William Alfred Fowler, Kenneth G. Wilson, James Watson Cronin, Val Logsdon Fitch, Sheldon Lee Glashow with their silly Standard Model, can they ever multiply muon mass 105MeV by 9 and see it is within Sigma Error of the neutron and proton (alleged proton rest mass) of 940MeV. Meaning what? Meaning that the proton is a composite of 8 muon rings and the neutron is 9 muon rings. And the muon is the real true electron of atoms, stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law of creating new electrical energy-- the reason stars and Sun shine. But no, the imps of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs put physics knowledge and understanding backwards in time, to caveman mentality physics with their impish Standard Model. > > > > > > > Why do imps of physics like Glashow or Higgs never understand that a do nothing electron and do nothing proton are imp reasoning in physics. Whereas AP's particles are always doing some law of Electrodynamics. And why does Nobel award imps of science, do they like imp physics instead of true physics? > > > > > > Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, John C. Mather, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, David J. Gross -- please, please can they ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole. > > > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-.. > > > > > > , . `.' ' `. > > > > > > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ; > > > > > > . ; .' . `. ; > > > > > > ; . ' `. . ' > > > > > > . ' ` `. | > > > > > > . '. ' > > > > > > . 0 0 ' `. > > > > > > ' ` > > > > > > ; ` > > > > > > .' ` > > > > > > ; U ` > > > > > > ; '; ` > > > > > > : | ;.. :` ` > > > > > > : `;. ```. .-; | ' > > > > > > '. ` ``.., .' :' ' > > > > > > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am McGinn antiscience with together my friends Claudius, Pennino, Pnal flood sci.physics everyday so as to hog front page, and thus no other post survives the front page more than 5 seconds. > > > > > > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' ' > > > > > > ` ` ; ; ' ' > > > > > > ` ` ; ; ' ' > > > > > > ` `. ````'''''' ' ' > > > > > > ` . ' ' > > > > > > / ` `. ' ' . > > > > > > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...' > > > > > > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....''' > > > > > > / .'' ; ` .' ` > > > > > > ...'.' ; .' ` .' ` > > > > > > "" .' .' | ` .; \ ` > > > > > > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ ` > > > > > > :' | ' ` , `. ` > > > > > > | ' ` ' `. ` > > > > > > ` ' ` ; `. | > > > > > > `.' ` ; `-' > > > > > > `...' > > > > > > > > > Robert Ingalls,David Kaplan,Univ Washington,Henry Lubatti,Lillian McDermott,Larry McLerran,Gerald Miller is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is offtopic Relf? Is Relf taking away your attention? > > > > > > > > > Stupid Nobel Physics prizes to those who cannot even ask the question of which is the atom's real true electron, the muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole > > > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita > > > Arthur B. McDonald > > > Francois Englert > > > Saul Perlmutter > > > Brian P. Schmidt > > > Adam G. Riess > > > Makoto Kobayashi > > > Toshihide Maskawa > > > Yoichiro Nambu > > > John C. Mather > > > George F. Smoot > > > Roy J. Glauber > > > David J. Gross > > > Hugh David Politzer > > > Frank Wilczek > > > Raymond Davis Jr. > > > Masatoshi Koshiba > > > Riccardo Giacconi > > > Gerardus 't Hooft > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman > > > Jerome I. Friedman > > > Henry W. Kendall > > > Richard E. Taylor > > > Carlo Rubbia > > > Simon van der Meer > > > William Alfred Fowler > > > Kenneth G. Wilson > > > James Watson Cronin > > > Val Logsdon Fitch > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow > > > Steven Weinberg > > > . > > > . > > > little fishes > > > . > > > . > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV > > > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics > > > . > > > . > > > John Baez > > > Brian Greene > > > Lisa Randall > > > Alan H. Guth > > > Michael E. Brown > > > Konstantin Batygin > > > Ben Bullock > > > Larry Harson > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter. > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley > > > Edward Witten > > > > > > > > > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV. > > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles. > > > Length: 17 pages > > > > > > Product details > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019 > > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > > • Print Length : 17 pages > > > • File Size : 698 KB > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG > > > • Language: : English > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book > > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty. > > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors. > > > Length: 39 pages > > > > > > Product details > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020 > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN > > > • Print Length : 39 pages > > > • File Size : 935 KB > > > • Language: : English > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store) > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store) > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store) > > > > > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book > > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5 > > > Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics. > > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072. > > > Length: 20 pages > > > > > > Product details > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7 > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020 > > > • Language: : English > > > • File size : 1134 KB > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > > • Print length : 20 pages > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store) > > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book > > > > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics. > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon. > > > > > > > > > Product details > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020 > > > • Language : English > > > • File size : 587 KB > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled > > > • Print length : 25 pages > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry > > > > > > > > > > > > #1-7, 138th published book > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms. > > > Length: 41 pages > > > > > > Product details > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020 > > > • File Size : 828 KB > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled > > > • Print Length : 41 pages > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD > > > • Language: : English > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book > > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book. > > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science. > > > > > > Foreward: > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences. > > > Length: 632 pages > > > > > > > > > Product details > > > File Size: 1132 KB > > > Print Length: 632 pages > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019 > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC > > > Language: English > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled > > > X-Ray: Not Enabled > > > Word Wise: Enabled > > > Lending: Enabled > > > Screen Reader: Supported > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store) > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store) > > > #8526 in Physics (Books) > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books) > > > > > > > > > #1-9, 163rd published book > > > > > > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition > > > > > > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate. > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa. > > > > > > Product details > > > • ASIN : B09NQ65H9F > > > • Publication date : December 15, 2021 > > > • Language : English > > > • File size : 999 KB > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > > • Print length : 60 pages > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > > > > > > > y z > > > | / > > > | / > > > |/______ x > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies. > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night. > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts. > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot. > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe > > > Archimedes Plutonium > > > > > > > > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book > > > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > > > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory > > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me. > > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to. > > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory. > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism. > > > Length: 64 pages > > > > > > Product details > > > • File Size : 790 KB > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020 > > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > > • Print Length : 64 pages > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Language: : English > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store) > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads > > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book > > > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2 > > > Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education. > > > > > > Product details > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020 > > > • Language: : English > > > • File size : 682 KB > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > > • Print length : 78 pages > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store) > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books) > > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3 > > > Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future. > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory. > > > > > > Product details > > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V > > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020 > > > • Language : English > > > • File size : 794 KB > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > > • Print length : 123 pages > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store) > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books) > > > > > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4 > > > Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics. > > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me. > > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics. > > > > > > Product details > > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM > > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021 > > > • Language : English > > > • File size : 1033 KB > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > > • Print length : 386 pages > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > y z > > > | / > > > | / > > > |/______ x > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies. > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night. > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts. > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot. > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe > > > Archimedes Plutonium > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #3-1, 2nd published book > > > > > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere. > > > > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule. > > > > > > Length: 1150 pages > > > > > > > > > Product details > > > • File Size : 2167 KB > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019 > > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > > • Print Length : 1150 pages > > > • Language: : English > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > > • Lending : Enabled > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store) > > > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference > > > #1324 in General Chemistry > > > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-25 09:49 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <vk2g1h9emjfquc4me8a2lgcj5r3eh8jh1p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #846109 |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >What's it all about, Ukraine... Ukraine has been Russian since about 1760. It's a huge fertile area, a grainbasket! The Tsar Vladimir is grabbing it before someone else does. (Like Frederick & Silesia) And didn't the USA bitch & scream when the Russians tried to put missiles into Cuba in 1962? Pot/Kettle black!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-24 14:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e83g1h5ei3rfllhnngjl2qclicq54es628@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #846153 |
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:49:54 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote: >On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>What's it all about, Ukraine... > >Ukraine has been Russian since about 1760. > >It's a huge fertile area, a grainbasket! > >The Tsar Vladimir is grabbing it before someone else does. > >(Like Frederick & Silesia) > >And didn't the USA bitch & scream when the Russians tried to put >missiles into Cuba in 1962? > >Pot/Kettle black! > > They didn't TRY, they DID put missiles in Cuba. get it straight. learn the game of chess... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-24 15:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <k54g1h174768gu1jm9vsad50la2kpgv8r1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #846156 |
Putin would have never invaded if Biden had threaten to cancel his Netfix subscription... On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 14:57:37 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:49:54 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker >><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >>>What's it all about, Ukraine... >> >>Ukraine has been Russian since about 1760. >> >>It's a huge fertile area, a grainbasket! >> >>The Tsar Vladimir is grabbing it before someone else does. >> >>(Like Frederick & Silesia) >> >>And didn't the USA bitch & scream when the Russians tried to put >>missiles into Cuba in 1962? >> >>Pot/Kettle black! >> >> > >They didn't TRY, they DID put missiles in Cuba. > > >get it straight. > >learn the game of chess... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wi1liam T <willyt1955@yahooomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-25 00:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sv98jh$1otql$3@news.freedyn.de> |
| In reply to | #846153 |
>On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>What's it all about, Ukraine... > >Ukraine has been Russian since about 1760. > >It's a huge fertile area, a grainbasket! > >The Tsar Vladimir is grabbing it before someone else does. > >(Like Frederick & Silesia) > >And didn't the USA bitch & scream when the Russians tried to put >missiles into Cuba in 1962? > >Pot/Kettle black! > > I see nothing wrong with shooting Russians in the USA and letting our sewers overflow with their blood. Russians are pigs who rape their daughters and drink heavily. Putin is a pedophile. One day someone will kill him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-25 21:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <2632892.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #846153 |
Peter Jason wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>What's it all about, Ukraine... > > Ukraine has been Russian since about 1760. Nonsense. PointedEars -- Q: How many theoretical physicists specializing in general relativity does it take to change a light bulb? A: Two: one to hold the bulb and one to rotate the universe. (from: WolframAlpha)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dick's DriveIn" <Dicks@Jeff-Relf.Me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-25 14:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Russia jumped Ukraine & ButtFucked her live, on TV. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.25--2.52pm.Seattle.2022> |
| In reply to | #846241 |
Russia jumped Ukraine & ButtFucked her live, on TV.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-26 11:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ft0l1h5k1q11ar1rgcdlscfdkq9drb3qb4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #846109 |
Pavlo Rizanenko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament told USA Today that Ukraine may have to arm themselves with their own nuclear weapons if the United States and other world leaders do not hold up their end of the agreement. He said "We gave up nuclear weapons because of this agreement. Now, there's a strong sentiment in Ukraine that we made a big mistake." He also said that, "In the future, no matter how the situation is resolved in Crimea, we need a much stronger Ukraine. If you have nuclear weapons, people don't invade you." "If you have nuclear weapons, people don't invade you." On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >What's it all about, Ukraine... > >It's all Albert Einstein's doing. > >It's about atomic bombs. > >Albert Einstein said >that what is needed >is to put atomic bombs >pointing to places like Russia. > >The Ukraine guy said if >i cannot be part of NATO >then I will put atomic bombs >pointing at Russia. > > > > >Russia said, "I cannot have that." > >So, Russia needed to grab Ukraine >before it happens. > >(Russia won't invade Ukraine if >they have atomic bombs pointing >at them) > > >Yous certainty didn't want Cuba >have atom bombs pointing at yous >in USA. > > >... >Now China (with it's cats eyes) is >eyeing the USA like a cat looks >at a mouse. > >also notice how quiet Israel is... > >but watch out for the cat. > >There's a PUSSY in the White House, >everyone wants to fuck dat pussy! > >You certainty don't want 3 more >years of a pussy in the whitey house. > >You won't recognize the earth in 3 years. > >Start changing the maps around. > >Mexico will have an atomic bomb pointing >at the USA soon... > >I'm going to have to start a Russian dating service!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-26 12:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mi1l1ht5v3nj66cskjtn52vgvllhp8dsct@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #846322 |
On April 15, 2021 Andriy Melnyk, Ukrainian ambassador to Germany, told Deutschlandfunk radio that if Ukraine was not allowed to become a NATO member, his country might have to reconsider its status as a non-nuclear weapon state to guarantee its defense In February 2022, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky renewed such sentiments, suggesting that Ukraine would potentially view the Budapest Memorandum as invalid should its security guarantees not be met "If you have nuclear weapons, people don't invade you." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine The solution is simple... all the people of earth go to Ukraine and kill those fuckin Russians. the only good commie is a dead commie. Don't worry about Putin, I'll take of him myself. I know where he lives. On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 11:48:42 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Pavlo Rizanenko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament told USA Today >that Ukraine may have to arm themselves with their own nuclear weapons >if the United States and other world leaders do not hold up their end >of the agreement. He said "We gave up nuclear weapons because of this >agreement. Now, there's a strong sentiment in Ukraine that we made a >big mistake." He also said that, "In the future, no matter how the >situation is resolved in Crimea, we need a much stronger Ukraine. If >you have nuclear weapons, people don't invade you." > > > >"If you have nuclear weapons, people don't invade you." > > > > > > >On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>What's it all about, Ukraine... >> >>It's all Albert Einstein's doing. >> >>It's about atomic bombs. >> >>Albert Einstein said >>that what is needed >>is to put atomic bombs >>pointing to places like Russia. >> >>The Ukraine guy said if >>i cannot be part of NATO >>then I will put atomic bombs >>pointing at Russia. >> >> >> >> >>Russia said, "I cannot have that." >> >>So, Russia needed to grab Ukraine >>before it happens. >> >>(Russia won't invade Ukraine if >>they have atomic bombs pointing >>at them) >> >> >>Yous certainty didn't want Cuba >>have atom bombs pointing at yous >>in USA. >> >> >>... >>Now China (with it's cats eyes) is >>eyeing the USA like a cat looks >>at a mouse. >> >>also notice how quiet Israel is... >> >>but watch out for the cat. >> >>There's a PUSSY in the White House, >>everyone wants to fuck dat pussy! >> >>You certainty don't want 3 more >>years of a pussy in the whitey house. >> >>You won't recognize the earth in 3 years. >> >>Start changing the maps around. >> >>Mexico will have an atomic bomb pointing >>at the USA soon... >> >>I'm going to have to start a Russian dating service! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-08 13:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8khf2hda5vsn84hj8sb90mditngcms41t7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #846109 |
Since Putin said if his Netflix account gets canceled, it would be an act of war... Where is Putin planning to drop the bomb first???? New York? El Lay?? Wisconsin??? Are we at Defcon 5 yet? Where is Putin going to get Netflix from???? Does he have VPN? (cause that might be how he gets around change Netflix region...) Maybe he is getting Netflix from Wisconsin so Wisconsin is save ...for now. I mean, he is planning to drop the bomb, right? But where? Or, are you people tooo afraid to ask the unaskable? to think the unthinkable to question the unquestionable, mention the unmentionable, and say the unsayable. Maybe I can make a suggestion... How about Israel???? Whose side is Israel on, USA or Russia? Putin will probably say..."If I bomb Israel nobody is going to give a fuck!" And his advisers say, "How about Wisconsin?" Putin shoots him. On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >What's it all about, Ukraine... > >It's all Albert Einstein's doing. > >It's about atomic bombs. > >Albert Einstein said >that what is needed >is to put atomic bombs >pointing to places like Russia. > >The Ukraine guy said if >i cannot be part of NATO >then I will put atomic bombs >pointing at Russia. > > > > >Russia said, "I cannot have that." > >So, Russia needed to grab Ukraine >before it happens. > >(Russia won't invade Ukraine if >they have atomic bombs pointing >at them) > > >Yous certainty didn't want Cuba >have atom bombs pointing at yous >in USA. > > >... >Now China (with it's cats eyes) is >eyeing the USA like a cat looks >at a mouse. > >also notice how quiet Israel is... > >but watch out for the cat. > >There's a PUSSY in the White House, >everyone wants to fuck dat pussy! > >You certainty don't want 3 more >years of a pussy in the whitey house. > >You won't recognize the earth in 3 years. > >Start changing the maps around. > >Mexico will have an atomic bomb pointing >at the USA soon... > >I'm going to have to start a Russian dating service! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-08 15:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6227E1A1.2FED@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #847292 |
Shouldn't there be now kids under their school desk? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D87ePJ1X4AAtJma.jpg The Starmaker wrote: > > Since Putin said if his Netflix account gets canceled, it would be an > act of war... > > Where is Putin planning to drop > the bomb first???? > > New York? > > El Lay?? > > Wisconsin??? > > Are we at Defcon 5 yet? > > Where is Putin going to get Netflix from???? Does he have VPN? (cause > that might be how he gets around change Netflix region...) > > Maybe he is getting Netflix from Wisconsin so Wisconsin is save ...for > now. > > I mean, he is planning to drop the bomb, right? > > But where? > > Or, are you people tooo afraid to ask the unaskable? > > to think the unthinkable > to question the unquestionable, > mention the unmentionable, and > say the unsayable. > > Maybe I can make a suggestion... > > How about Israel???? > > Whose side is Israel on, USA or Russia? > > Putin will probably say..."If I bomb Israel nobody is going to give a > fuck!" > > And his advisers say, "How about Wisconsin?" > > Putin shoots him. > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >What's it all about, Ukraine... > > > >It's all Albert Einstein's doing. > > > >It's about atomic bombs. > > > >Albert Einstein said > >that what is needed > >is to put atomic bombs > >pointing to places like Russia. > > > >The Ukraine guy said if > >i cannot be part of NATO > >then I will put atomic bombs > >pointing at Russia. > > > > > > > > > >Russia said, "I cannot have that." > > > >So, Russia needed to grab Ukraine > >before it happens. > > > >(Russia won't invade Ukraine if > >they have atomic bombs pointing > >at them) > > > > > >Yous certainty didn't want Cuba > >have atom bombs pointing at yous > >in USA. > > > > > >... > >Now China (with it's cats eyes) is > >eyeing the USA like a cat looks > >at a mouse. > > > >also notice how quiet Israel is... > > > >but watch out for the cat. > > > >There's a PUSSY in the White House, > >everyone wants to fuck dat pussy! > > > >You certainty don't want 3 more > >years of a pussy in the whitey house. > > > >You won't recognize the earth in 3 years. > > > >Start changing the maps around. > > > >Mexico will have an atomic bomb pointing > >at the USA soon... > > > >I'm going to have to start a Russian dating service! > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-08 15:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6227EDB8.318B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #847303 |
Biden makes an announcement he is going to ban oil from Russia... then he leaves quickly without taking questions... you know Why... He's gotta get into a bunker Quickly! The rest of yous are on your own. The Starmaker wrote: > > Shouldn't there be now kids under their school desk? > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D87ePJ1X4AAtJma.jpg > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Since Putin said if his Netflix account gets canceled, it would be an > > act of war... > > > > Where is Putin planning to drop > > the bomb first???? > > > > New York? > > > > El Lay?? > > > > Wisconsin??? > > > > Are we at Defcon 5 yet? > > > > Where is Putin going to get Netflix from???? Does he have VPN? (cause > > that might be how he gets around change Netflix region...) > > > > Maybe he is getting Netflix from Wisconsin so Wisconsin is save ...for > > now. > > > > I mean, he is planning to drop the bomb, right? > > > > But where? > > > > Or, are you people tooo afraid to ask the unaskable? > > > > to think the unthinkable > > to question the unquestionable, > > mention the unmentionable, and > > say the unsayable. > > > > Maybe I can make a suggestion... > > > > How about Israel???? > > > > Whose side is Israel on, USA or Russia? > > > > Putin will probably say..."If I bomb Israel nobody is going to give a > > fuck!" > > > > And his advisers say, "How about Wisconsin?" > > > > Putin shoots him. > > > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:06:55 -0800, The Starmaker > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > >What's it all about, Ukraine... > > > > > >It's all Albert Einstein's doing. > > > > > >It's about atomic bombs. > > > > > >Albert Einstein said > > >that what is needed > > >is to put atomic bombs > > >pointing to places like Russia. > > > > > >The Ukraine guy said if > > >i cannot be part of NATO > > >then I will put atomic bombs > > >pointing at Russia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Russia said, "I cannot have that." > > > > > >So, Russia needed to grab Ukraine > > >before it happens. > > > > > >(Russia won't invade Ukraine if > > >they have atomic bombs pointing > > >at them) > > > > > > > > >Yous certainty didn't want Cuba > > >have atom bombs pointing at yous > > >in USA. > > > > > > > > >... > > >Now China (with it's cats eyes) is > > >eyeing the USA like a cat looks > > >at a mouse. > > > > > >also notice how quiet Israel is... > > > > > >but watch out for the cat. > > > > > >There's a PUSSY in the White House, > > >everyone wants to fuck dat pussy! > > > > > >You certainty don't want 3 more > > >years of a pussy in the whitey house. > > > > > >You won't recognize the earth in 3 years. > > > > > >Start changing the maps around. > > > > > >Mexico will have an atomic bomb pointing > > >at the USA soon... > > > > > >I'm going to have to start a Russian dating service! > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-08 19:02 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <t08uc3$161n$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #847311 |
On 3/8/2022 5:58 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Biden makes an announcement he is going to ban oil from Russia... > then he leaves quickly without taking questions... > you know Why... > He's gotta get into a bunker Quickly! > > > The rest of yous are on your own. > Hehe :) No, real war is not going to happen cause it means government (on all sides) have to begin real work. They don't want it. They just want to stay pertinent so they got what they wanted it all along. A cold war. Biden is happy. Putin is happy. They're both old school cold war vets. It safeguards them against anything their public could do to them or criticize. And it makes them able to suck the blood out of the public. Cause there's this "danger" of the other side lurking all the time. Without a cold war Americans (and Russians) wouldn't give a damn about government. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ayaz Siddiqi <ayaz.s.siddiqi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-08 22:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b33bb720-3c9c-47d9-b224-2ff107181e9fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #847320 |
On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 1:03:05 AM UTC, Clutterfreak wrote: > On 3/8/2022 5:58 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Biden makes an announcement he is going to ban oil from Russia... > > then he leaves quickly without taking questions... > > you know Why... > > He's gotta get into a bunker Quickly! > > > > > > The rest of yous are on your own. > > > Hehe :) No, real war is not going to happen cause it means government > (on all sides) have to begin real work. They don't want it. They just > want to stay pertinent so they got what they wanted it all along. A cold > war. > > Biden is happy. Putin is happy. They're both old school cold war vets. > It safeguards them against anything their public could do to them or > criticize. And it makes them able to suck the blood out of the public. > > Cause there's this "danger" of the other side lurking all the time. > > Without a cold war Americans (and Russians) wouldn't give a damn about > government. > > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus howzit alberts fault then exactly as it so happens?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Egbert <gayrightistsx@yahoomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-09 12:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0a8ak$2b32l$1@news.freedyn.de> |
| In reply to | #847320 |
>Without a cold war Americans (and Russians) wouldn't give a damn about >government. > > Give Alaska to Putin to appease him and don't forget to include Sarah Palin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-09 11:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7luh2h17ndqr81dcouirim3qrhnlhjg0q1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #847364 |
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 12:59:01 -0000 (UTC), Egbert <gayrightistsx@yahoomail.com> wrote: >>Without a cold war Americans (and Russians) wouldn't give a damn about >>government. >> >> > >Give Alaska to Putin to appease him and don't forget to include Sarah Palin So you want Russian atomic bomb missiles in Alaska pointing at the USA. you don't know...What's it all about. Here: What's it all about, Ukraine... It's all Albert Einstein's doing. It's about atomic bombs. Albert Einstein said that what is needed is to put atomic bombs pointing to places like Russia. The Ukraine guy said if i cannot be part of NATO then I will put atomic bombs pointing at Russia. Russia said, "I cannot have that." So, Russia needed to grab Ukraine before it happens. (Russia won't invade Ukraine if they have atomic bombs pointing at them) Yous certainty didn't want Cuba have atom bombs pointing at yous in USA. ... Now China (with it's cats eyes) is eyeing the USA like a cat looks at a mouse. also notice how quiet Israel is... but watch out for the cat. There's a PUSSY in the White House, everyone wants to fuck dat pussy! You certainty don't want 3 more years of a pussy in the whitey house. You won't recognize the earth in 3 years. Start changing the maps around. Mexico will have an atomic bomb pointing at the USA soon... I'm going to have to start a Russian dating service! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Egbert <gayrightistsx@yahoomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-10 12:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0crj6$2cgjb$6@news.freedyn.de> |
| In reply to | #847320 |
>Without a cold war Americans (and Russians) wouldn't give a damn about >government. > > Give Alaska to Putin to appease him and don't forget to include Sarah Palin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-10 12:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <j8v051F9s35U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #847474 |
On 3/10/2022 6:40 AM, Egbert wrote: >> Without a cold war Americans (and Russians) wouldn't give a damn about >> government. >> >> > > Give Alaska to Putin to appease him and don't forget to include Sarah Palin Aren't you just a later day Neville Chamberlain sock? I'm surprised there are people who don't learn from history. If you must repeat it, please do so on your own and leave the rest 0f humanity out of it. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Egbert <gayrightistsx@yahoomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-11 01:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0e8r4$2d8vd$18@news.freedyn.de> |
| In reply to | #847320 |
>Without a cold war Americans (and Russians) wouldn't give a damn about >government. > > Give Alaska to Putin to appease him and don't forget to include Sarah Palin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web