Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #837441 > unrolled thread

Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 20:10 -0800
    Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 09:46 -0800
      Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 13:26 -0800
        Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 13:38 -0800
    Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 13:36 -0800
      Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 13:46 -0800
        Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 14:13 -0800
          Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 15:11 -0800
          Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-12-05 19:50 -0500
            Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 18:09 -0800
        Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 14:47 -0800
    Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2021-12-06 11:20 +1100
      Celebrate our differences. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-12-05 17:00 -0800
        Re: Celebrate our differences. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 18:03 -0800
          Celebrate our differences. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-12-05 21:24 -0800
            Re: Celebrate our differences. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 23:22 -0800
              Re: Celebrate our differences. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 23:36 -0800
      Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 18:01 -0800
        Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2021-12-06 22:50 +1100
          Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 04:55 -0800
            Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-12-06 14:18 -0500
          Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 09:05 -0600
            Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-12-06 14:25 -0500
            Arindam Banerjee fails to sell a dime of his snake oil to anyone. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-12-06 13:38 -0800
              Re: Arindam Banerjee fails to sell a dime of his snake oil to anyone. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 16:23 -0600
                Re: Arindam Banerjee fails to sell a dime of his snake oil to anyone. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 14:50 -0800
                Might as well insist that the earth stop spinning. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-12-06 15:10 -0800
                  Re: Might as well insist that the earth stop spinning. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 00:09 -0800
            Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 14:05 -0800
            Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 14:31 -0800
          Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-12-06 13:34 -0800
            Re: Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 15:36 -0800
              Re: Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 18:12 -0800
                Re: Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 05:37 -0800
                  Re: Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-12-07 09:42 -0500
    Re: Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 15:38 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#837547

On 12/6/2021 7:55 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Monday, 6 December 2021 at 22:50:55 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 06-Dec-21 1:01 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>> On Monday, 6 December 2021 at 11:20:28 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> On 05-Dec-21 3:10 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>> The subject line:
>>>>> "Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors?"
>>>>> is pertinent for this ng.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not that there are any physicists here, any more.
>>>>> Nevertheless...
>>>>>
>>>> You appear to have misstated your question.
>>>>
>>>> The correct statement of your question is:
>>>>
>>>> "Do physicists know enough physics to convince you that you're wrong in
>>>> the face of your delusions of superiority?"
>>>
>>> Obviously, they do not, for they do not study what I write and do not repeat my experiments.

>> Yes, we've seen your experiments, and they're so badly done that the
>> results are entirely unconvincing to anyone except you.
> 
> 
> That is a black lie.
> You are a shameless liar.

No, it is not a lie. Your 'experiments' are so poorly done, nobody can 
tell anything by looking at them. If you EVER want actual scientists to 
repeat your 'experiments', you're going to have to make actual 
measurements (with potential errors described) as well as make a video 
which CLEARLY demonstrates your claim.  Your pathetic 'armature' video 
is useless.

>> is that anyone who took the trouble to replicate your experiments
>> properly would get results that are consistent with the current
>> understanding of physics, making the whole exercise a complete waste of
>> time and effort.
> 
> So no one will take any trouble to repeat my experiments on the most specious of unscientific grounds. 

Nobody is going to try to repeat your 'experiments' when from what 
anyone can see, shows nothing other than being consistent with the 
current understanding of physics. A waste of time.

> No matter, it is always possible to improve upon what I have done.

Great! Go ahead and do that!  Remember, it has to be good enough to 
convince a skeptical reader.

> And I have done just that, and will do better still. Nothing new to show in the theoretical sense, for the new results corroborate past work.

We await your peer reviewed scientific paper with CLEAR evidence of your 
claims.

> Point is, I have exposed the hollowness of the racist and bigoted occidentalists.

Your racism as an excuse for your failure is worthless, in fact it 
counts against you as an excuse maker.

> Fortunately, the media and politicians and business worlds exist. With improved results shown they cannot but show interest.

Great! Get busy making a useful demonstration!

> 
> I have done them properly.
> They have been done meticulously following the most rigorous scientific method, very openly, with full detailed analysis and explanations.

No you haven't. All you have are videos of a crashing 'armature'. 
Anyone can allow an 'armature' to roll downhill and demonstrate nothing.

> Racism and bigotry are so deep, ideals and goals actually.

Quit making excuses for yourself.  Nobody cares about your skin color, a 
failure at physics is a failure at physics.  Look at AP, he's a failure 
of physics as well and he gets no pass by being white.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837521

On 12/6/2021 5:50 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> Sensible students will realise the truth of what I've written above, and 
> write you off as a crank.
> 
> Sylvia.


Arindam is not a Crank. Totally two different things. A crank is someone 
who diligently follows his own way of doing things whatever that "thing" 
may be and among whatever sea of people doing that "thing" differently.
Arindam is not a crank. He is a hustler, a crook who's trying to sell 
bogus stuff to make money. Kicked elsewhere, he comes here for revenge.

Equivalent to that creature in USA is those who sold Snake Oils. They're 
still here busy but inside pharma various "lose weight" or "get healthy" 
schemes.

In a physicist's view, Arindam is a crook, not a crank. "Jim Pennino" is 
a crank. Any google jockey wiki jockey here is a crank. Arindam is a 
crook. A dishonest salesman.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837549

On 12/6/2021 10:05 AM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 12/6/2021 5:50 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> Sensible students will realise the truth of what I've written above, 
>> and write you off as a crank.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> 
> 
> Arindam is not a Crank. Totally two different things. A crank is someone 
> who diligently follows his own way of doing things whatever that "thing" 
> may be and among whatever sea of people doing that "thing" differently.
> Arindam is not a crank. He is a hustler, a crook who's trying to sell 
> bogus stuff to make money. Kicked elsewhere, he comes here for revenge.

No, he is a crank, by your definition.  He is doing his own "thing" by 
claiming his crashing "armature" discovery as well as many unsupported 
claims of physics. He shows many other 'crank' traits as well, such as a 
claim to be 'special'/genius/chosen by the gods/whatever. 
Megalomania/NPD/Dunning-Kruger all rolled up in one person.

He may or may not be a crook as well, but I don't really think so.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837571 — Arindam Banerjee fails to sell a dime of his snake oil to anyone.

ClutterFreak:
> Arindam is a crook. A dishonest salesman...

...who fails to sell a dime of his snake oil to anyone.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837574 — Re: Arindam Banerjee fails to sell a dime of his snake oil to anyone.

On 12/6/2021 3:38 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> ClutterFreak:
>> Arindam is a crook. A dishonest salesman...
> 
> ...who fails to sell a dime of his snake oil to anyone.
> 

Yes but he's here for other reasons. I'm sure you know of those types of 
groupies of music bands who follow their tours everywhere they go just 
to stand in front and throw beer bottles at the band. He's that type of 
groupie. He wants so suck their dicks and yet at the same time is so 
full of jealousy that spits at them and throws beer cans at them.

Confused little characters. They exist!

By the way, Jeff. Are you one? You seem to keep inserting other threads 
into my blogs here by changing the subject headers and target newsgroups 
in them. It kind of look like throwing beer bottles at the blog.

And yet you keep reading them! So Jeff, are you also one of them?

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837580 — Re: Arindam Banerjee fails to sell a dime of his snake oil to anyone.

On Tuesday, 7 December 2021 at 09:32:38 UTC+11, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 12/6/2021 3:38 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: 
> > ClutterFreak: 
> >> Arindam is a crook. A dishonest salesman... 
> > 
> > ...who fails to sell a dime of his snake oil to anyone. 
>
well there are always those who oppose the good

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837583 — Might as well insist that the earth stop spinning.

Arindam insists that I reject "e=mcc", like he does.

ClutterFreak insists that I not add comments to "his" threads,
& that I don't change the "Subject:" line.

Might as well insist that the earth stop spinning,
for all the good it does.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837622 — Re: Might as well insist that the earth stop spinning.

On Tuesday, 7 December 2021 at 12:09:29 UTC+11, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Arindam insists that I reject "e=mcc", like he does. 

everyone should.
> 
> ClutterFreak insists that I not add comments to "his" threads, 
> & that I don't change the "Subject:" line. 

Gad, what a comparison!   The mountain with the pebble.
> 
> Might as well insist that the earth stop spinning, 
> for all the good it does.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837573

On Tuesday, 7 December 2021 at 02:05:50 UTC+11, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 12/6/2021 5:50 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: 
> > Sensible students will realise the truth of what I've written above, and 
> > write you off as a crank. 
> > 
> > Sylvia.
> Arindam is not a Crank. Totally two different things. A crank is someone 
> who diligently follows his own way of doing things whatever that "thing" 
> may be and among whatever sea of people doing that "thing" differently. 
> Arindam is not a crank. He is a hustler, a crook who's trying to sell 
> bogus stuff to make money. Kicked elsewhere, he comes here for revenge. 

Another liar, dishonest to the core, and stupid too. Also, a cowardly no-name no-fame entity, with no moral compass and stuffed with bias.

He says I am trying to sell stuff, but that is a silly lie for I am selling nothing.

I am telling young people to study what I have written with care and understanding, and do my experiments. That is not selling, but giving. 

 I have spent milions of dollars worth of my time over the past twenty plus years giving my intellectual property to all who could be interested. That is not selling anything, but influencing for global welfare. 

Those bright people who read my works and repeat my experiments can come to their own conclusions after doing all that honestly.

As I have done a great job, brilliant and simple, original and productive, they will come to the same conclusions and from there they will know what to do.

It will be really sad if in the whole world not one such bright spark may be found. With more media publicity of my work, these sparks will unite to form one bright flame.

Certainly I will sell what can be sold, in due course, if and when I have something to sell.

And it will in due course in sales volume be of the order of quadrillions of Australian dollars.

That is what changing human destiny is all about, in crude money terms. The amount of joy and ease to the whole planet and beyond is incalculable.

That is a also bit too much for small minds with their petty goals to grasp.


> 
> Equivalent to that creature in USA is those who sold Snake Oils. They're 
> still here busy but inside pharma various "lose weight" or "get healthy" 
> schemes. 

More shameless lies. I have no product to sell at present. In due course my company or some derivative of same may sell a new class of electric motors for space travel, based upon my theories and research findings.
That may not happen in my lifetime.


> 
> In a physicist's view, Arindam is a crook, not a crank. "Jim Pennino" is 
> a crank. Any google jockey wiki jockey here is a crank. Arindam is a 
> crook. A dishonest salesman. 

Lies from those like this negative creep here amount to compliments from the good. Two negatives make a positive. 

To repeat, young people must repeat my experiments on their own and then question the physics establishments.

That will be a very positive and peaceful revolution.

And just what is needed.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee 
> 
> -- 
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837576

On Tuesday, 7 December 2021 at 02:05:50 UTC+11, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 12/6/2021 5:50 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: 
> > Sensible students will realise the truth of what I've written above, and 
> > write you off as a crank. 

No they won't if they are sensible in the honest sense.
I have faith in the ultimate goodness of human nature, and in honesty.
We could not have come so far if we are not more good than bad.
But there are times, such as now, that bad trumps good, in the field of physics.
That will pass.
 
> > Sylvia.
> Arindam is not a Crank. Totally two different things. A crank is someone 
> who diligently follows his own way of doing things whatever that "thing" 
> may be and among whatever sea of people doing that "thing" differently. 
> Arindam is not a crank. He is a hustler, a crook who's trying to sell 
> bogus stuff to make money. Kicked elsewhere, he comes here for revenge. 

That is a lie, worthy of one with intellect and character far below that of roaches.
A most stupid one too, for I am not selling anything.

I am presenting new ideas on a public platform, and showing off my new experiments. For all the world to see and judge.

I am not selling anything, but I am most certainly influencing.  Out of my own time, for the greater good of all that is animal, mineral and vegetable.

***********
Yes, I am sure that in due course they will lead to products worth QUADRILLIONS AND QUINTILLIONS OVER THE CENTURIES.
***********

New motors for space travel, and for very fast travel on Earth going to near space and moving there at very high speeds.
Then the HTN of course, that will be funded by the profits from the above.
Plus space mining, space manufacture, space farming, space tourism, space colonisation - all from my updated physics.
Travel to the stars, infinite expansion, nothing to keep humanity constricted.

That is what happens when a fundamental detail in the realm of physics is elaborated upon - human destiny is changed.
Just as done by Galileo, Newton, Maxwell, Jagadish Bose, Tesla, Rutherford, Curie and those of similar vein.

It is up to the young people to study my works, repeat my experiments, improve upon them, and change the curriculum in physics as a result.
Bad ideas must go!


> Equivalent to that creature in USA is those who sold Snake Oils. They're 
> still here busy but inside pharma various "lose weight" or "get healthy" 
> schemes. 

Rubbish lies, I am not selling anything.  I am influencing with new ideas and ways,  and improving upon existence, like any social worker  working on a voluntary basis for causes good and great.
> 
> In a physicist's view, Arindam is a crook, not a crank. "Jim Pennino" is 
> a crank. Any google jockey wiki jockey here is a crank. Arindam is a 
> crook. A dishonest salesman. 

All modern physicists who support Einstein's ridiculous theories are crooks, for they get paid for supporting and spreading falsehoods.
I am what I am, the greatest genius of all time, and sole god among lotsa devils.
Devils now have their day, and how long that day will be, will be determined by young people repeating and verifying my experiments and agreeing with my theories, that will set physics back on track.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
> 
> -- 
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837570 — Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself.

Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837586 — Re: Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself.

On Tuesday, 7 December 2021 at 10:16:30 UTC+11, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself.

It looks like a East -West thing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837594 — Re: Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself.

On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 5:00:03 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:

> It looks like a East -West thing.

No... it is a "science" vs "dumbfuck idiot" thing... and you are the clear loser here...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837627 — Re: Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself.

On Tuesday, 7 December 2021 at 03:12:39 UTC+1, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 5:00:03 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
> 
> > It looks like a East -West thing.
> No... it is a "science" vs "dumbfuck idiot" thing... and you are the clear loser here...

In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden
by your moronic religion GPS clocks keep measuring t'=t,
just like all serious clocks always did.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837630 — Re: Arindam Banerjee won't/can't convince anyone but himself.

On 12/7/2021 8:37 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 December 2021 at 03:12:39 UTC+1, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 5:00:03 PM UTC-8, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like a East -West thing.
>> No... it is a "science" vs "dumbfuck idiot" thing... and you are the clear loser here...
> 
> In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden
> by your moronic religion GPS clocks keep measuring t'=t,
> just like all serious clocks always did.
> 

Speaking of dumbfuck idiots, here comes the retarded parrot Wozniak, 
right on schedule! Polly wanna cracker?  BRAAWWWK!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#837587

On Sunday, 5 December 2021 at 15:10:26 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> The subject line: 
> "Do physicists know enough physics to correct their ridiculous errors?" 
> is pertinent for this ng. 
> 
> Not that there are any physicists here, any more. 
> Nevertheless...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web