Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #895997 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Christopher Howard <christopher@librehacker.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-05-21 12:21 -0800 |
| Last post | 2026-05-24 04:35 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
question regarding electron energy states and current Christopher Howard <christopher@librehacker.com> - 2026-05-21 12:21 -0800
Re: question regarding electron energy states and current John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2026-05-21 20:55 -0500
Re: question regarding electron energy states and current ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-05-22 07:50 +0000
Re: question regarding electron energy states and current Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-24 04:35 +0200
| From | Christopher Howard <christopher@librehacker.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-21 12:21 -0800 |
| Subject | question regarding electron energy states and current |
| Message-ID | <87mrxsldjl.fsf@librehacker.com> |
Hi, I was reading an introductory chapter in an electronics book, an older book (1960's, I think) and it explained insulators, conductors, and semiconductors in connection with bands of energy states in quantum theory. He seemed to be saying that conductors allow electrons to easily move between energy bands, movement of electrons is current, and therefore conductors allow current. The part I'm unclear on: when exactly is it that the electron moves from one part of the conductor to the next, i.e., down the wire? Are we just saying that, at the higher energy state, the electron will be moving around the material more often? Or that somehow moving from one energy state to the other, is movement through the conductor? -- Christopher Howard
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-21 20:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <87zf1s5ht5.fsf@sugarbit.com> |
| In reply to | #895997 |
Christopher Howard writes: > The part I'm unclear on: when exactly is it that the electron moves > from one part of the conductor to the next, i.e., down the wire? Are > we just saying that, at the higher energy state, the electron will be > moving around the material more often? A simple model is that the conduction band electrons are not bound to any particular atom but are free to move around the crystal in response to external fields. -- John Hasler john@sugarbit.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-22 07:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <electrons-20260522084157@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| In reply to | #895997 |
Christopher Howard <christopher@librehacker.com> wrote or quoted: >theory. He seemed to be saying that conductors allow electrons to easily >move between energy bands, movement of electrons is current, and >therefore conductors allow current. The /energy of an electron/, here, is the sum of its kinetic and potential energy. An electron of low energy is bound to its atom because it does not have enough energy to break free from it just like a frog cannot leave the Earth because it cannot jump high enough. An electron of high energy can move away from its atom to neighboring atoms just like a rocket can leave Earth and fly to the moon. An /energy band/ is a range of energies. The /valence band/ is the range of energies of the outermost electrons of an atom. The /conduction band/ is the range of energies that allows electrons to move freely within a conductor. In a conductor, the region of outermost electrons of one atom /overlaps/ with the region of outermost electrons of neighboring atoms, so the valence band and the conduction band /overlap/. The electrons in that overlap can move freely through the conductor. So, they do not move from one band to another band, but stay in the overlap region of two bands. >The part I'm unclear on: when exactly is it that the electron moves from >one part of the conductor to the next, i.e., down the wire? The model is more of a statistical model. It does not specify details about the exact time of the exact position of a single electron. > Are we >just saying that, at the higher energy state, the electron will be >moving around the material more often? Some electrons of low energy are in core bands where they are tightly bound to their atom and cannot move away from it. Electrons of higher energy are in the conduction band, where they can move freely around the conductor. > Or that somehow moving from one >energy state to the other, is movement through the conductor? In this model, electrons do not move from one band to another band, which would mean they change their energy. Instead, some electrons can be in the valence band and the conduction band at the same time, because these bands overlap.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-05-24 04:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <10uto67$h742$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #896001 |
Stefan Ram wrote:
> In a conductor, the region of outermost electrons of one atom
> /overlaps/ with the region of outermost electrons of neighboring
> atoms, so the valence band and the conduction band /overlap/.
>
> The electrons in that overlap can move freely through the conductor.
>
> So, they do not move from one band to another band, but stay
> in the overlap region of two bands.
Of two bands _of the same kind_ of _two neighboring_ atoms.
>> The part I'm unclear on: when exactly is it that the electron moves from
>> one part of the conductor to the next, i.e., down the wire?
>
> The model is more of a statistical model. It does not specify
> details about the exact time of the exact position of a single
> electron.
However, an electron in the conduction band is not a free electron -- hence
the corresponding model is called *_nearly_ free electron model*; so it is
only more likely to move to a neighboring atom if there is an external
electric field as that exerts a force on the former and accelerates it;
describing that with energies, because of that force it has an additional
electrostatic potential energy that can be and is converted to (additional)
kinetic energy.
>> Are we
>> just saying that, at the higher energy state, the electron will be
>> moving around the material more often?
>
> Some electrons of low energy are in core bands where they are
> tightly bound to their atom and cannot move away from it.
> > Electrons of higher energy are in the conduction band, where they
> can move freely around the conductor.
Again, they are _only approximately_ "free". And they can only move around
because not all energy states in the conduction band of _a neighboring_ atom
are already "used" by an electron, IOW the conduction band of that atom is
not completely filled.
>> Or that somehow moving from one
>> energy state to the other, is movement through the conductor?
>
> In this model, electrons do not move from one band to another
> band, which would mean they change their energy.
This *also* happens, and whether and to what extent that is possible defines
whether a solid acts as an electric conductor, an isolator, or a semiconductor.
> Instead, some
> electrons can be in the valence band and the conduction band
> at the same time,
NOT *the same* electron, *ever*. A quantum object (like an electron) being
in two (different) states or two (different) places at the same time is NOT
a correct interpretation of quantum mechanics.
> because these bands overlap.
Ridiculously wrong. This *never* happens. Instead, there usually is a
*band gap* between the valence band and the conduction band -- energies that
an electron _cannot_ have ("are forbidden") -- which is why and how we
identify these electronic energy bands in the first place.
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web