Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #892953 > unrolled thread

What is a photon

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-01 10:03 +0000
    Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 12:46 +0200
      Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-01 12:51 +0200
        Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 14:08 +0200
          Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-01 14:35 +0200
      Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-01 13:29 +0200
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-02 03:16 +0000
          Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-01 20:45 -0700
            Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-02 06:39 +0200
            Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-02 06:43 +0200
            Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-02 06:52 +0200
          Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-03 13:22 +0200
            Re: What is a photon hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-03 11:48 +0000
              Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-04 15:10 +0200
                Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-04 15:37 +0200
                Re: What is a photon hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-04 15:45 +0000
                  Re: What is a photon x <x@x.org> - 2025-06-04 12:22 -0700
                    Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 23:29 +0000
                      Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-06 05:33 +0000
                        Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-06 08:20 +0200
                        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-06 07:29 +0000
                        Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-06 10:36 +0200
                          Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-06 09:22 +0000
                        Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-06 11:31 +0200
                          Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-06 11:37 +0200
                            Re: What is a photon Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 21:58 -0700
                              Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-13 13:43 +0200
                                Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-13 14:23 +0200
                              Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-13 11:49 +0000
            Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-03 14:52 +0200
              Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-03 15:31 +0200
                Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-03 21:22 +0200
                  Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-03 22:11 +0200
            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-04 08:39 +0000
              Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-04 14:32 +0200
                Re: What is a photon x <x@x.org> - 2025-06-04 11:50 -0700
                  Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-04 12:12 -0700
                    Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-04 21:18 +0200
                  Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 13:41 +0000
                    Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-13 19:50 +0200
                      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 09:47 +0000
                        Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 13:21 -0700
                          Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 22:12 +0000
                            Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-14 15:27 -0700
                              Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 12:36 -0700
                Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 11:51 +0000
                  Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 23:24 +0000
                  Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 12:40 -0700
                    Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-06 22:51 +0000
                    Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 12:42 -0700
                      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 21:21 +0000
                  Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 06:46 +0200
                    Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-09 05:33 +0000
                      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-09 07:50 +0000
                      Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-11 07:30 +0200
                        Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-11 11:35 +0200
                          Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-12 06:12 +0200
                            Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-12 13:18 +0200
                              Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 14:22 +0000
                                Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-12 21:38 +0200
                              Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-13 09:55 +0200
                                Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-14 11:33 +0200
                                  Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:35 +0200
                                    Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-15 14:56 +0200
                                      Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-15 15:14 +0200
                                      Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:32 +0200
                                Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-30 03:11 +0000
                                  Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-30 06:44 -0700
                            Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-12 21:11 +0200
                              Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-13 10:13 +0200
                                Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-13 20:27 +0200
                                  Re: What is a photon Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-06-13 18:52 +0000
                                  Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-14 09:07 +0200
                                    Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-14 11:09 +0200
                                      Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:14 +0200
                                        Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-15 15:13 +0200
                              Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-13 13:25 +0200
                        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 02:01 +0000
                          Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-12 06:29 +0200
                            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 11:05 +0000
                              Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-13 09:45 +0200
                                Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 03:19 +0000
                  Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-10 20:59 +0200
                    Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 22:11 +0000
                      Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-10 15:45 -0700
                      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 04:27 +0000
                        Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-11 20:50 +0200
                          Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-11 21:43 +0200
                            Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-12 00:04 +0200
                          Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-23 05:53 +0000
                    Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-11 13:20 +0200
              Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-05 11:24 +0200
                Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-05 12:08 +0000
                  Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 14:20 -0700
                    Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-07 21:33 +0000
                Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 12:41 +0000
                  Re: What is a photon Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-06-05 12:54 -0500
                    Re: What is a photon x <x@x.org> - 2025-06-05 13:23 -0700
                      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 22:19 +0000
                        Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-05 15:36 -0700
                Re: What is a photon Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-06-05 12:50 -0500
                  Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 22:06 +0000
                Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-11 14:16 +0200
                  Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 14:13 -0700
            Re: What is a photon ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-06-14 09:26 +0000
      Re: What is a photon Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-06-01 13:22 +0000
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-02 03:08 +0000
          Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-01 20:47 -0700
        Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 01:21 -0700
      Re: What is a photon Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 16:25 -0500
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 00:28 +0000
          Re: What is a photon Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-06-02 10:31 +0100
          Re: What is a photon Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 17:01 -0500
            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 23:19 +0000
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 00:57 +0000
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 22:33 +0000
          Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-16 23:14 +0000
            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-16 23:35 +0000
              Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-18 01:29 +0000
    Re: What is a photon Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-06-01 13:20 +0000
      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-01 13:49 +0000
        Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-01 08:07 -0700
          Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-01 17:18 +0200
            Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-01 08:45 -0700
      Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-02 12:47 +0000
        Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-02 15:55 +0200
          Re: What is a photon Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 17:10 -0500
          Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-03 10:45 +0000
            Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-03 14:30 +0200
              Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-04 05:23 +0000
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-03 04:27 +0000
          Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-03 10:45 +0000
            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-03 11:39 +0000
    Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 13:07 -0700
      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 00:44 +0000
      Re: What is a photon hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-02 01:07 +0000
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-02 03:14 +0000
          Re: What is a photon hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-02 10:52 +0000
            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 14:09 +0000
              Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 23:16 +0000
            Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 14:36 -0700
              Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-03 00:18 +0000
                Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-02 17:38 -0700
                  Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 03:29 +0000
                    Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 05:24 -0700
                      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 13:35 +0000
                        Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 07:30 -0700
                Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 11:55 -0700
                  Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 01:16 +0000
                    Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-08 11:28 -0700
                      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-08 22:31 +0000
                        Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 12:09 -0700
                          Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 13:51 -0700
                            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 02:26 +0000
                              Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 13:25 -0700
                                Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 16:49 -0700
                          Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 01:54 +0000
            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 01:31 +0000
              Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 03:12 +0000
            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-30 01:12 +0000
              Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-29 19:31 -0700
                Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-30 04:58 +0000
                  Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-30 06:52 -0700
      Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-02 19:03 +0200
      Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-02 20:21 +0200
      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 22:23 +0000
    Re: What is a photon x <x@x.org> - 2025-06-02 04:50 -0700
      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-03 03:28 +0000
      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 22:17 +0000
        Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:56 +0200
          Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 09:52 +0000
            Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:16 +0200
              Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-17 06:01 +0000
                Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:15 +0200
                  Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-18 08:24 +0000
    Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 07:39 -0700
      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 23:20 +0000
    Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-15 14:36 +0200
      Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 22:56 +0000
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-17 02:38 +0000
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-19 23:00 +0000
          Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-20 14:54 +0200
            Re: What is a photon ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-06-20 15:30 +0000
              Re: What is a photon Adolf Göbel <adolfgoebel@aol.com> - 2025-06-20 21:13 +0200
              Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-20 21:19 +0200
            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-20 22:38 +0000
              Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-22 22:56 +0000
                Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-24 02:08 +0000
                  Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-27 04:01 +0000
                    Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-28 19:14 +0200
                      Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-29 06:09 +0200
                        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 04:28 +0000
                          Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 10:20 +0000
                          Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-30 14:12 +0200
                            Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-30 14:02 +0000
    Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 23:15 +0000
      Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-28 17:54 -0700
        Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 04:37 +0000
          Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-29 07:18 -0700
        Re: What is a photon William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-29 15:45 -0400
          Re: What is a photon ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-06-29 20:05 +0000
            Re: What is a photon William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-29 18:51 -0400
              Re: What is a photon ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-06-30 13:41 +0000
            Re: What is a photon ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-05-12 10:06 +0000
          Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 23:40 +0000
            Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-29 17:36 -0700
          Re: What is a photon ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-08-31 13:24 +0000
            Re: What is a photon William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 15:54 -0400

Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11  Next page →

#893062

On 6/5/25 4:24 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> 
> The solar system moves around the center of our home galaxy and this 
> galaxy around the center of our local super-cluster and that around what 
> only heaven knows.
> 
> S


No, Heaven and I.

It moves around Physfit's dick, you stupid Bitch of the USA.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893139

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 17:50:32 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 6/5/25 4:24 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>
>>
>> The solar system moves around the center of our home galaxy and this
>> galaxy around the center of our local super-cluster and that around what
>> only heaven knows.
>>
>> S
>
>
> No, Heaven and I.
>
> It moves around Physfit's dick, you stupid Bitch of the USA.

Roaches don't have dicks, Roachie.

Keep on lurking in the catacombs of Paris, antennae out on the lookout
for discarded baguettes.

WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893160

On 05/06/2025 11:24, Thomas Heger wrote:

> That's why the universe cannot have a center (because that center would 
> not move).

Actually, in an infinite universe, every point in the bulk
is equivalently the/a center...

-Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893172

On 6/11/2025 5:16 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On 05/06/2025 11:24, Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> That's why the universe cannot have a center (because that center 
>> would not move).
> 
> Actually, in an infinite universe, every point in the bulk
> is equivalently the/a center...

Fwiw, the plane in the following experimental animation of mine has no 
center:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSPgb51Hry8

It's basically, everywhere.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893262

"Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> wrote or quoted:
>The result is that it is thoroughly confirmed that
>the speed of light is invariant.

  Since its beginnings, science has been an assault on common sense.
  The Greek astronomer Aristarchus of Samos first argued in the
  third century B.C. that the earth moves around the sun rather
  than what we all seem to see - the sun moving around the earth.
  (Bruce Gregory in 1999)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892960

Le 01/06/2025 à 12:39, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:

 Ce n'est pas la vitesse de la lumière qui est invariante, mais 
l'anisochronie universelle dans le vide parfait. 

 R.H. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892977

On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 13:22:24 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> Le 01/06/2025 à 12:39, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
>
>> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:

Wrong. In the Copernican model the light speed has to be variant.

Out e=CCM
Up
E=0.5mvvN(N-k)

Energy is created and destroyed.

WOOF woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor
>
>  Ce n'est pas la vitesse de la lumière qui est invariante, mais
> l'anisochronie universelle dans le vide parfait.
>
>  R.H.

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892981

In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 13:22:24 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
> 
>> Le 01/06/2025 à 12:39, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
>>
>>> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:
> 
> Wrong. In the Copernican model the light speed has to be variant.

Nope, the the Copernican model says nothing about the speed of light
outside of your delusions, crackpot.

-- 
penninojim@yahoo.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893377

On 6/1/2025 6:22 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
> Le 01/06/2025 à 12:39, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
> 
>> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:
> 
> Ce n'est pas la vitesse de la lumière qui est invariante, mais 
> l'anisochronie universelle dans le vide parfait.
> R.H.

More riders in a field: https://youtu.be/YsAkm0VlCsw

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892967

On 6/1/25 5:46 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 01.06.2025 12:03, skrev bertitaylor:
>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed
>> in the medium of aether.
>>
>> Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from
>> external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric
>> field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a
>> electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on,
>> infinitely infinitely.
>>
>> Bertietaylor
>>
>> -- 
> 
> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:
> 
> https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1913.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
> 
> How is that possible if light is waves in an aether ?
> 


Hehe :) Cute.

That Hindu has the brain of a high-school dropout. You expect him to 
understand the 5 papers? Could be that there's something about your 
brain as well.

Ask him a high school physics question to see if he even knows that much.

Here, ask him this. We solved it in 12th grade high school: Arindam is 
standing on the edge of the roof of a 20 meter high building. He has two 
balls (in his hands, that is - below his huge stomach there's nothing) 
with him. He throws one straight upward and let the other one fall 
downward by itself a second later. What initial speed should he give to 
the first one so the two balls would hit the ground at the same time?

I can bet my boots Arindam cannot solve this question by himself. He'd 
search the web for the solution, or ask AI to solve it for him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892973

On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:25:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 6/1/25 5:46 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>> Den 01.06.2025 12:03, skrev bertitaylor:
>>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed
>>> in the medium of aether.
>>>
>>> Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from
>>> external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric
>>> field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a
>>> electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on,
>>> infinitely infinitely.
>>>
>>> Bertietaylor
>>>
>>> --
>>
>> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:

They are all bungled stuff
Light speed is variant, kinetic.
The stupid apes, the silliest of pseudoscientific pretentious pigheads,
following Aristotle in effect, forgot that the Earth moves in aether
just as planes fly in air.
So the distance light travels from one point on Earth to another is at
just one angle the same as the measured distance


>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1913.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>
>> How is that possible if light is waves in an aether ?
>>
>
>
> Hehe :) Cute.
>
> That Hindu has the brain of a high-school dropout. You expect him to
> understand the 5 papers? Could be that there's something about your
> brain as well.
>
> Ask him a high school physics question to see if he even knows that
> much.
>
> Here, ask him this. We solved it in 12th grade high school: Arindam is
> standing on the edge of the roof of a 20 meter high building. He has two
> balls (in his hands, that is - below his huge stomach there's nothing)
> with him. He throws one straight upward and let the other one fall
> downward by itself a second later. What initial speed should he give to
> the first one so the two balls would hit the ground at the same time?
>
> I can bet my boots Arindam cannot solve this question by himself. He'd
> search the web for the solution, or ask AI to solve it for him.

Silly Roachie, Arindam has no use for your pitiable self. Keep on
lurking in the catacombs of Paris gorging on discarded baguettes.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892987

bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) writes:

> WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
>
> Bertietaylor
>
> --

Can you put your signature after the signature line?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892998

On 6/1/25 7:28 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:25:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>> On 6/1/25 5:46 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>> Den 01.06.2025 12:03, skrev bertitaylor:
>>>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed
>>>> in the medium of aether.
>>>>
>>>> Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from
>>>> external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric
>>>> field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a
>>>> electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on,
>>>> infinitely infinitely.
>>>>
>>>> Bertietaylor
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:
> 
> They are all bungled stuff
> Light speed is variant, kinetic.
> The stupid apes, the silliest of pseudoscientific pretentious pigheads,
> following Aristotle in effect, forgot that the Earth moves in aether
> just as planes fly in air.
> So the distance light travels from one point on Earth to another is at
> just one angle the same as the measured distance
> 
> 
>>>
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1913.pdf
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>>
>>> How is that possible if light is waves in an aether ?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hehe :) Cute.
>>
>> That Hindu has the brain of a high-school dropout. You expect him to
>> understand the 5 papers? Could be that there's something about your
>> brain as well.
>>
>> Ask him a high school physics question to see if he even knows that
>> much.
>>
>> Here, ask him this. We solved it in 12th grade high school: Arindam is
>> standing on the edge of the roof of a 20 meter high building. He has two
>> balls (in his hands, that is - below his huge stomach there's nothing)
>> with him. He throws one straight upward and let the other one fall
>> downward by itself a second later. What initial speed should he give to
>> the first one so the two balls would hit the ground at the same time?
>>
>> I can bet my boots Arindam cannot solve this question by himself. He'd
>> search the web for the solution, or ask AI to solve it for him.
> 
> Silly Roachie, Arindam has no use for your pitiable self. Keep on
> lurking in the catacombs of Paris gorging on discarded baguettes.
> 
> WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
> 
> Bertietaylor
> 
> -- 



Get beheaded.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893001

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:01:51 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 6/1/25 7:28 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:25:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/1/25 5:46 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>>> Den 01.06.2025 12:03, skrev bertitaylor:
>>>>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed
>>>>> in the medium of aether.
>>>>>
>>>>> Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from
>>>>> external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric
>>>>> field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a
>>>>> electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on,
>>>>> infinitely infinitely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertietaylor
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:
>>
>> They are all bungled stuff
>> Light speed is variant, kinetic.
>> The stupid apes, the silliest of pseudoscientific pretentious pigheads,
>> following Aristotle in effect, forgot that the Earth moves in aether
>> just as planes fly in air.
>> So the distance light travels from one point on Earth to another is at
>> just one angle the same as the measured distance
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1913.pdf
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>>>
>>>> How is that possible if light is waves in an aether ?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hehe :) Cute.
>>>
>>> That Hindu has the brain of a high-school dropout. You expect him to
>>> understand the 5 papers? Could be that there's something about your
>>> brain as well.
>>>
>>> Ask him a high school physics question to see if he even knows that
>>> much.
>>>
>>> Here, ask him this. We solved it in 12th grade high school: Arindam is
>>> standing on the edge of the roof of a 20 meter high building. He has two
>>> balls (in his hands, that is - below his huge stomach there's nothing)
>>> with him. He throws one straight upward and let the other one fall
>>> downward by itself a second later. What initial speed should he give to
>>> the first one so the two balls would hit the ground at the same time?
>>>
>>> I can bet my boots Arindam cannot solve this question by himself. He'd
>>> search the web for the solution, or ask AI to solve it for him.
>>
>> Silly Roachie, Arindam has no use for your pitiable self. Keep on
>> lurking in the catacombs of Paris gorging on discarded baguettes.
>>
>> WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
>>
>> Bertietaylor
>>
>> --
>
>
>
> Get beheaded.

That means divine Arindam is being totally correct. The lying devils are
speechless.

Woof woof woof-woof woof

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893143

On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:25:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 6/1/25 5:46 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>> Den 01.06.2025 12:03, skrev bertitaylor:
>>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed
>>> in the medium of aether.
>>>
>>> Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from
>>> external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric
>>> field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a
>>> electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on,
>>> infinitely infinitely.
>>>
>>> Bertietaylor
>>>
>>> --
>>
>> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1913.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>
>> How is that possible if light is waves in an aether ?
>>
>
>
> Hehe :) Cute.
>
> That Hindu has the brain of a high-school dropout. You expect him to
> understand the 5 papers? Could be that there's something about your
> brain as well.
>
> Ask him a high school physics question to see if he even knows that
> much.
>
> Here, ask him this. We solved it in 12th grade high school: Arindam is
> standing on the edge of the roof of a 20 meter high building. He has two
> balls (in his hands, that is - below his huge stomach there's nothing)
> with him. He throws one straight upward and let the other one fall
> downward by itself a second later. What initial speed should he give to
> the first one so the two balls would hit the ground at the same time?
>
> I can bet my boots Arindam cannot solve this question by himself. He'd
> search the web for the solution, or ask AI to solve it for him.

Poetic answer by Arindam's dead dogs:

Roachie has no dick
But he IS a prick.

He pines for balls -
But just appalls.

Is he ever right?
The dick-less
And ball-less
Lose in every fight.

So Roachie does lose,
Has nothing to choose.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor
Merel

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893280

On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:25:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 6/1/25 5:46 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>> Den 01.06.2025 12:03, skrev bertitaylor:
>>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed
>>> in the medium of aether.
>>>
>>> Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from
>>> external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric
>>> field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a
>>> electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on,
>>> infinitely infinitely.
>>>
>>> Bertietaylor
>>>
>>> --
>>
>> Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant:
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1913.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>
>> How is that possible if light is waves in an aether ?

These bunglers had no clue that the Earth was actually moving. And so
the equipment on the Earth was moving. This light always travels in
aether greater or lesser distances than marked out. This is a universal
phenomenon. No one can know what the speed is wrt the static solid fine
aether filling the infinite and eternal universe.

The MMX is the big daddy of such velocity experiments. The light speed
varies with emitter to take care of the extra distances travelled
between any two points of the moving platform. Which is Earth in our
case. Thus the nulls formed are due to light speed variance and not
light speed invariance.

Arindam found this huge bungle back in 2005. Some 20 years ago. As the
physicists are a shameless criminal lot they have ignored Arindam's
discovery.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor
>>
>
>
> Hehe :) Cute.
>
> That Hindu has the brain of a high-school dropout. You expect him to
> understand the 5 papers? Could be that there's something about your
> brain as well.
>
> Ask him a high school physics question to see if he even knows that
> much.
>
> Here, ask him this. We solved it in 12th grade high school: Arindam is
> standing on the edge of the roof of a 20 meter high building. He has two
> balls (in his hands, that is - below his huge stomach there's nothing)
> with him. He throws one straight upward and let the other one fall
> downward by itself a second later. What initial speed should he give to
> the first one so the two balls would hit the ground at the same time?
>
> I can bet my boots Arindam cannot solve this question by himself. He'd
> search the web for the solution, or ask AI to solve it for him.

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893341

On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:33:24 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 15.06.2025 00:33, skrev Bertitaylor:
>>
>> These bunglers had no clue that the Earth was actually moving. And so
>> the equipment on the Earth was moving. This light always travels in
>> aether greater or lesser distances than marked out. This is a universal
>> phenomenon. No one can know what the speed is wrt the static solid fine
>> aether filling the infinite and eternal universe.
>
>
> If EM-radiation were a wave in an aether, it would be as easy
> to measure the speed of Earth relative to the aether,
> as it is to measure the speed of an aeroplane relative to the air.

No. The premise for the MMX was flawed. You can never find the speed of
any object with respect to aether as light speed is variant. And light
travels more or less distance than two marked points. So the speed of
light APPEARS the same when actually it is variant. As proved by the
Doppler effect.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor
>
>>
>> The MMX is the big daddy of such velocity experiments. The light speed
>> varies with emitter to take care of the extra distances travelled
>> between any two points of the moving platform. > Which is Earth in our
>> case. Thus the nulls formed are due to light speed variance and not
>> light speed invariance.
>
> The MMX shows that the speed of light is isotropic in all
> inertial frames.
>
> Waves in a medium are anisotropic in all inertial
> frames but the one that is stationary relative to the medium.
>
> So MMX shows that light is not a wave in the aether.
>
>>
>> Arindam found this huge bungle back in 2005. Some 20 years ago. As the
>> physicists are a shameless criminal lot they have ignored Arindam's
>> discovery.
>
> Quite.
> The physics of Arindam Banerjee, employee of a medical research
> laboratory, has discovered much new physics.
>
> Complete works in physics by Arindam Banerjee:
> https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.bengali/c/mbbPlpsbbxk
>
> "The cause of gravity":
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ
>
> Quote of the first few statements:
>   "The formula for universal gravitation is well known to be,
>    as the force F acting between two masses m and M, parted by
>    a distance r from their centres of mass, as F=GmM/r^2, where G
>    is the gravitational constant found by experiment. Recently
>    the author has updated this formula to F=BnN/r^2 where B is
>    a constant, and n and N are the number of protons or electrons
>    in the masses m and M. It is obvious that as n and N are proportional
>    to m and M, this is essentially the same formula with the difference
>    that instead of masses, the new formula involves charges. Thus the
>    gravitational force is expressed electrostatically, as a
> manifestation
>    of electrostatic force. In other words, there is no difference
> between
>    electrostatic force and gravitational force."
>
> Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the Sun is exerting
> the electrostatic force 3.6e22 N on the Earth?
>
> I bet you will ignore this question. :-D
>
>
> "The Structure of Heavenly Bodies":
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ
>
> Quote about the pressure within the Earth:
>   "F = G*m*D*pi*4*R/3
>    Now when R or the radius of the Earth is zero, which is the case
>    when the m is at the centre of the Earth, then F = 0. Now pressure
>    is force per unit area, so pressure at the centre of the Earth is
>    also zero."
>
> Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the pressure at
> the centre of the Earth is zero?
>
> I bet you will ignore this question. :-D
>
> In that case, I will ask again.
>
> I may also quote more genial discoveries from Arindam's papers,
> because they are rather entertaining.
>

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893343

On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 23:14:44 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:33:24 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
>> Den 15.06.2025 00:33, skrev Bertitaylor:
>>>
>>> These bunglers had no clue that the Earth was actually moving. And so
>>> the equipment on the Earth was moving. This light always travels in
>>> aether greater or lesser distances than marked out. This is a universal
>>> phenomenon. No one can know what the speed is wrt the static solid fine
>>> aether filling the infinite and eternal universe.
>>
>>
>> If EM-radiation were a wave in an aether, it would be as easy
>> to measure the speed of Earth relative to the aether,
>> as it is to measure the speed of an aeroplane relative to the air.
>
> No. The premise for the MMX was flawed. You can never find the speed of
> any object with respect to aether as light speed is variant. And light
> travels more or less distance than two marked points. So the speed of
> light APPEARS the same when actually it is variant. As proved by the
> Doppler effect.
>
> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
> Bertietaylor
>>
>>>
>>> The MMX is the big daddy of such velocity experiments. The light speed
>>> varies with emitter to take care of the extra distances travelled
>>> between any two points of the moving platform. > Which is Earth in our
>>> case. Thus the nulls formed are due to light speed variance and not
>>> light speed invariance.
>>
>> The MMX shows that the speed of light is isotropic in all
>> inertial frames.
>>
>> Waves in a medium are anisotropic in all inertial
>> frames but the one that is stationary relative to the medium.
>>
>> So MMX shows that light is not a wave in the aether.
>>
>>>
>>> Arindam found this huge bungle back in 2005. Some 20 years ago. As the
>>> physicists are a shameless criminal lot they have ignored Arindam's
>>> discovery.
>>
>> Quite.
>> The physics of Arindam Banerjee, employee of a medical research
>> laboratory, has discovered much new physics.

Wrong as always! Arindam never worked in medical research. Wonder where
you got that from and how low you racist and bigoted creeps will stoop
to demean and diminish the divine Arindam.

>>
>> Complete works in physics by Arindam Banerjee:
>> https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.bengali/c/mbbPlpsbbxk
>>
>> "The cause of gravity":
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ
>>
>> Quote of the first few statements:
>>   "The formula for universal gravitation is well known to be,
>>    as the force F acting between two masses m and M, parted by
>>    a distance r from their centres of mass, as F=GmM/r^2, where G
>>    is the gravitational constant found by experiment. Recently
>>    the author has updated this formula to F=BnN/r^2 where B is
>>    a constant, and n and N are the number of protons or electrons
>>    in the masses m and M. It is obvious that as n and N are proportional
>>    to m and M, this is essentially the same formula with the difference
>>    that instead of masses, the new formula involves charges. Thus the
>>    gravitational force is expressed electrostatically, as a
>> manifestation
>>    of electrostatic force. In other words, there is no difference
>> between
>>    electrostatic force and gravitational force."
>>
>> Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the Sun is exerting
>> the electrostatic force 3.6e22 N on the Earth?

Ridiculous question seeing that there is gravitational attraction which
is really electrostatic.
>>
>> I bet you will ignore this question. :-D
>>
>>
>> "The Structure of Heavenly Bodies":
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ
>>
>> Quote about the pressure within the Earth:
>>   "F = G*m*D*pi*4*R/3
>>    Now when R or the radius of the Earth is zero, which is the case
>>    when the m is at the centre of the Earth, then F = 0. Now pressure
>>    is force per unit area, so pressure at the centre of the Earth is
>>    also zero."
>>
>> Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the pressure at
>> the centre of the Earth is zero?

Yes da oui si haaN hyaN bilkul zaroor ja with wohls on...
>>
>> I bet you will ignore this question. :-D
>>
>> In that case, I will ask again.
>>
>> I may also quote more genial discoveries from Arindam's papers,
>> because they are rather entertaining.

And also very deep, revolutionary, natural, logical, revealing,
explanatory... So how can the pseudoscientific establishment parasites
do anything but sneer when not ignoring?

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor
>>
>
> --

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#893365

On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 23:42:59 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 22:28:38 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 20:41:41 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Den 17.06.2025 01:35, skrev Bertitaylor:
>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 23:14:44 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:33:24 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> The physics of Arindam Banerjee, employee of a medical research
>>>>>> laboratory, has discovered much new physics.
>>>
>>>> Wrong as always! Arindam never worked in medical research. Wonder where
>>>> you got that from and how low you racist and bigoted creeps will stoop
>>>> to demean and diminish the divine Arindam.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc
>>> At the very beginning of the video you can read:
>>>       Arindam Banerjee,
>>>     HTN Research Pty Ltd.
>>>        6 September 2022
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.bengali/c/mbbPlpsbbxk
>>> Quote:
>>> " Complete works in physics by Arindam Banerjee
>>>    Arindam Banerjee,
>>>     HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne"
>>>
>>>     HTN stands for hypertension. Go figure.
>>>
>>> BTW, why do you think working in a medical research lab
>>> would "diminish the divine Arindam" ?
>>>
>>> So to his "physics":
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Complete works in physics by Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.bengali/c/mbbPlpsbbxk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The cause of gravity":
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quote of the first few statements:
>>>>>>   "The formula for universal gravitation is well known to be,
>>>>>>    as the force F acting between two masses m and M, parted by
>>>>>>    a distance r from their centres of mass, as F=GmM/r^2, where G
>>>>>>    is the gravitational constant found by experiment. Recently
>>>>>>    the author has updated this formula to F=BnN/r^2 where B is
>>>>>>    a constant, and n and N are the number of protons or electrons
>>>>>>    in the masses m and M. It is obvious that as n and N are proportional
>>>>>>    to m and M, this is essentially the same formula with the difference
>>>>>>    that instead of masses, the new formula involves charges. Thus the
>>>>>>    gravitational force is expressed electrostatically, as a
>>>>>> manifestation
>>>>>>    of electrostatic force. In other words, there is no difference
>>>>>> between
>>>>>>    electrostatic force and gravitational force."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the Sun is exerting
>>>>>> the electrostatic force 3.6e22 N on the Earth?
>>>
>>> The gravitational force between Earth and the Sun is 3.6e22 N.
>>>>
>>>> Ridiculous question seeing that there is gravitational attraction which
>>>> is really electrostatic.
>>>
>>> Maybe you should read it again?
>>>
>>> The Newtonian formula is F=GmM/r²   (1)
>>> Arindam's formula is:    F=BnN/r²   (2)
>>> Where:
>>>   B = G
> Wrong. They are not the same, liar
>>>   n = number of protons and electrons in the mass m
>>>   N = number of protons and electrons in the mass M
>>>
>>> That means:
>>>    m = n⋅mₑ + n⋅mₚ     (3)
>>>    M = N⋅mₑ + N⋅mₚ     (4)
>>>   where mₑ is the mass of an electron and mₚ is the mass of a proton.
>
> Huh?  Abracadabra here!
>>
>>
>> Rubbish. That is your idea which is not Arindam's.
>>
>> Don't twist meanings to suit your nonsense.
>>
>> The whole essay has to be read not just bits which are twisted.
>>
>> Arindam DOES NOT TALK OF MASSES ATTRACTING. That is just Newtonian
>> thinking which is obsolete. He shows how masses attract when masses are
>> considered charges.
>>
>> HE TALKS OF CHARGES ATTRACTING.
>>
>> See the diagrams. There are no masses considered. Only charges.
>>
>> Typical dishonesty, twisting, manipulating here by Einsteinian fraud.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Inserting (3) and (4) in (2) yields:
>>>   F=BnN/r² ≡ BnN/r²
>
> Wtf!
>>>
>>> So the two equations are identical!
>
> No, one assumes masses attract naturally being masses as per Newton.
> Arindam shows they attract because of the atomic configuration causing
> mild electrostatic attraction.
>
> Arindam thus shows that gravity is a consequence of electrostatic
> attraction being  slightly larger than electrostatic repulsion between
> two atoms.
>
> An universal phenomenon of such simplicity that only Arindam's genius
> could discover.
>
> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
>
> Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs doing propaganda for
> Arindam's works from low Heaven)
>>>
>>> Since the number of protons and electrons in is the same,
>>> there is no net electric charge in m. Same with M.

See Arindam's diagram about how atomic structure creates more
electrostatic attraction than repulsion so causing gravity.

Research means searching again. Arindam has done that. See if you can
understand. Or dare to!
>>>
>>> Do you really not understand that there is no electrostatic
>>> force between the two neutral masses m and M ?
>>>
>>> Do you still claim:
>>> "there is gravitational attraction which is really electrostatic"?

Yes, we are not likely to yield to lies such as yours.
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The Structure of Heavenly Bodies":
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quote about the pressure within the Earth:
>>>>>>   "F = G*m*D*pi*4*R/3
>>>>>>    Now when R or the radius of the Earth is zero, which is the case
>>>>>>    when the m is at the centre of the Earth, then F = 0. Now pressure
>>>>>>    is force per unit area, so pressure at the centre of the Earth is
>>>>>>    also zero."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the pressure at
>>>>>> the centre of the Earth is zero?
>>>>
>>>> Yes da oui si haaN hyaN bilkul zaroor ja with wohls on...
>>>
>>> Thanks for a clear answer.
>>> You, like Arindam believe that the pressure within the Earth
>>> is highest right below the surface and is diminishing with depth.

Till it becomes zero at the centre, yes. Highly consistent with reality.
Of constant magnetic field. Which is caused by constant circulating
current in the Earth. Which shows superconducting conditions there. So
had to be very cold. So no pressure there.
>>>
>>> The equation F = G*m*D*pi*4*R/3 is the gravitational force
>>> on a mass m when it is a distance R from the centre of the Earth.

Wrong. See if you can find where you are wrong.

As your knowledge of basic physics is far lower than that of any Indian
kid in middle school in the 1960s no point in continuing.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor
>>>
>>> The gravitational force on the mass m at the surface is:
>>>   F = m⋅9.91953 N (we ignore the rotation of the Earth)
>>>
>>> Let's consider the following scenario:
>>> We have a 1000 m deep cylindrical hole in the surface of the Earth.
>>>
>>> The gravitational force on you standing at the bottom of the hole is:
>>>   F = m⋅9.91790 N
>>>
>>> If your mass is 80 kg, your weight will be 0.1244 N less at
>>> the bottom of the hole than on the surface.
>>>
>>> So the gravitational force diminish with depth.
>>>
>>> Now we fill the hole with water.
>>> The pressure at the surface is 1 atm = 1013.25 hPa
>>> The pressure on you is now 10020 kPa or ca 100 atm.
>>>
>>> The pressure increases with depth, as any scuba diver would tell you.
>>>
>>> How can you, like Arindam, fail to know this?
>>>
>>> If we fill the hole with stone with density 5563 kg/m³
>>> (the average density of the Earth),
>>> the pressure at the bottom of the hole becomes:
>>>   55275 kPa or 556 atm
>>>
>>> The pressure at the centre of the Earth is 360 Gpa
>>> 3.5 millions atm.
>>>
>>> Do you still not understand how idiotic Arindam is when he
>>> claim that the pressure at the centre of the Earth is zero?
>>>
>>
>> --
>
> --

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892959

Le 01/06/2025 à 12:03, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) a écrit :

> causing vibration to aether. 

> Bertietaylor
> 
> --

to aether? 

After all the trouble we've gone to to refute and get rid of it, you want 
to reintroduce it?

R.H. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web