Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #859025 > unrolled thread

Glass slowing light speed

Started by"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
First post2022-08-07 13:35 -0700
Last post2022-08-08 20:55 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 25 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Glass slowing light speed "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-08-07 13:35 -0700
    Re: Glass slowing light speed Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-08-07 15:37 -0700
      Re: Glass slowing light speed "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-08-07 16:48 -0700
        Re: Glass slowing light speed Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-08-07 17:38 -0700
          Re: Glass slowing light speed "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-08-07 21:15 -0700
            Re: Glass slowing light speed Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-08-07 23:09 -0700
              Re: Glass slowing light speed "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-08-07 23:57 -0700
              Re: Glass slowing light speed whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-08-08 10:44 -0500
          Re: Glass slowing light speed James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2022-08-08 12:35 -0700
            Re: Glass slowing light speed Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-08-08 12:55 -0700
        Re: Glass slowing light speed Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-08-07 17:39 -0700
          Re: Glass slowing light speed James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2022-08-08 12:37 -0700
            Re: Glass slowing light speed "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-08-08 12:45 -0700
            Re: Glass slowing light speed Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-08-08 12:56 -0700
          Re: Glass slowing light speed Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-08-09 00:56 +0200
            Re: Glass slowing light speed Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-08-15 07:52 -0700
        Re: Glass slowing light speed Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2022-08-08 10:59 -0500
          Re: Glass slowing light speed "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-08-08 10:26 -0700
            Re: Glass slowing light speed Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-08-08 11:27 -0700
              Re: Glass slowing light speed "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-08-08 12:29 -0700
                Re: Glass slowing light speed Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-08-08 12:48 -0700
                  Re: Glass slowing light speed "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-08-08 13:48 -0700
                    Re: Glass slowing light speed Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-08-08 14:14 -0700
                      Re: Glass slowing light speed "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-08-08 19:01 -0700
                        Re: Glass slowing light speed Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-08-08 20:55 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#859025 — Glass slowing light speed

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-07 13:35 -0700
SubjectGlass slowing light speed
Message-ID<48d7bbc6-611b-44ef-a376-ea01d55eafc4n@googlegroups.com>
IN a medium it is still too fast...
to cross it and therefore to fast
to measure.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#859033

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-07 15:37 -0700
Message-ID<760beebe-893e-4a90-9fbd-2c1903d046bdn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859025
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> to cross it and therefore to fast 
> to measure.

Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself...

https://study.com/skill/learn/how-to-calculate-the-speed-of-light-in-a-medium-given-the-index-of-refraction-explanation.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859035

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-07 16:48 -0700
Message-ID<35e47192-4a4a-4819-ba59-82c528158555n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859033
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> 
> > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> > to cross it and therefore to fast 
> > to measure.
> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 

How could you measure light pass through a glass medium?
Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not.
Light is too fast.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859036

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-07 17:38 -0700
Message-ID<1611c7a8-485f-4556-9141-4a2903c9f458n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859035
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:48:42 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > 
> > > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> > > to cross it and therefore to fast 
> > > to measure. >
> > Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself...

 > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
> Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
> Light is too fast.

You did not read the link, right? If you did you would already know how to do the calculation, just by reading example #1... but I would speculate that the math would baffle you no end...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859041

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-07 21:15 -0700
Message-ID<74e24cf7-382a-4355-8c5d-6b78bf03acb2n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859036
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:38:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:48:42 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> > > > to cross it and therefore to fast 
> > > > to measure. > 
> > > Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
> 
> > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
> > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
> > Light is too fast.
> You did not read the link, right? If you did you would already know how to do the calculation, just by reading example #1... but I would speculate that the math would baffle you no end...

Haven't you figured it out PNUT. I don't believe everything I read.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859043

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-07 23:09 -0700
Message-ID<ca833d4a-e21f-4283-a3e2-1f9ab73129fcn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859041
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 9:15:57 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:38:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:48:42 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> > > > > to cross it and therefore to fast 
> > > > > to measure. > 
> > > > Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
> > 
> > > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
> > > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
> > > Light is too fast. 

> > You did not read the link, right? If you did you would already know how to do the calculation, just by reading example #1... but I would speculate that the math would baffle you no end...

> Haven't you figured it out PNUT. I don't believe everything I read.

So, Mitch... why are you here at all? EVERYTHING  needs to be read! If you really don't believe anything that you read, you are just a waste of perfectly good air here!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859047

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-07 23:57 -0700
Message-ID<a5a792a3-095c-40b9-811f-7b76d2b4bfe2n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859043
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 11:09:03 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 9:15:57 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:38:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:48:42 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > > > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> > > > > > to cross it and therefore to fast 
> > > > > > to measure. > 
> > > > > Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
> > > 
> > > > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
> > > > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
> > > > Light is too fast. 
> 
> > > You did not read the link, right? If you did you would already know how to do the calculation, just by reading example #1... but I would speculate that the math would baffle you no end... 
> 
> > Haven't you figured it out PNUT. I don't believe everything I read.
> So, Mitch... why are you here at all? EVERYTHING needs to be read! If you really don't believe anything that you read, you are just a waste of perfectly good air here!

I read but there has to be a good reason to believe it and you do not have that...
You are the goof of internet links paul...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859071

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2022-08-08 10:44 -0500
Message-ID<jlcpb9F4pbvU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#859043
On 8/8/2022 1:09 AM, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 9:15:57 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:38:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:48:42 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> IN a medium it is still too fast...
>>>>>> to cross it and therefore to fast
>>>>>> to measure. >
>>>>> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself...
>>>
>>>> How could you measure light pass through a glass medium?
>>>> Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not.
>>>> Light is too fast.
> 
>>> You did not read the link, right? If you did you would already know how to do the calculation, just by reading example #1... but I would speculate that the math would baffle you no end...
> 
>> Haven't you figured it out PNUT. I don't believe everything I read.
> 
> So, Mitch... why are you here at all? EVERYTHING  needs to be read! If you really don't believe anything that you read, you are just a waste of perfectly good air here!

He's not the only one...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859100

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-08 12:35 -0700
Message-ID<7d561432-9c63-44b4-a953-393a92f0e1a2n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859036
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:38:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:48:42 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> > > > to cross it and therefore to fast 
> > > > to measure. > 
> > > Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
> 
> > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
> > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
> > Light is too fast.
> You did not read the link, right? If you did you would already know how to do the calculation, just by reading example #1... but I would speculate that the math would baffle you no end...

You came here to tell us you can read?  Really?

Find a new hobby, science ain't your thing.

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859108

FromJim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date2022-08-08 12:55 -0700
Message-ID<ea68si-v9hn1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to#859100
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:38:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:48:42 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> > > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> > > 
>> > > > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
>> > > > to cross it and therefore to fast 
>> > > > to measure. > 
>> > > Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
>> 
>> > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
>> > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
>> > Light is too fast.
>> You did not read the link, right? If you did you would already know how to do the calculation, just by reading example #1... but I would speculate that the math would baffle you no end...
> 
> You came here to tell us you can read?  Really?
> 
> Find a new hobby, science ain't your thing.

Says the delusionally insane crackpot that still knows nothing about
Dalton's experiments of over 200 years ago.

> James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859037

FromJim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date2022-08-07 17:39 -0700
Message-ID<ui26si-b12l1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to#859035
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> 
>> > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
>> > to cross it and therefore to fast 
>> > to measure.
>> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
> 
> How could you measure light pass through a glass medium?
> Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not.
> Light is too fast.

While at one time labratory grade equipment was needed to make such
measurments, the equipment became hobby grade many decades ago.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859101

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-08 12:37 -0700
Message-ID<4bd19c1b-4fda-4b2c-a9ca-ea1cf62ee5bfn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859037
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:46:10 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> >> > to cross it and therefore to fast 
> >> > to measure. 
> >> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
> > 
> > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
> > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
> > Light is too fast.
> While at one time labratory grade equipment was needed to make such 
> measurments, the equipment became hobby grade many decades ago.

There isn't the slightest chance any of you science trolls have ever seen the inside of a laboratory.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859103

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-08 12:45 -0700
Message-ID<3553029a-3a99-4ae4-8fa0-bcb6894bc831n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859101
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 12:37:59 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:46:10 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> > mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > >> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > >> 
> > >> > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> > >> > to cross it and therefore to fast 
> > >> > to measure. 
> > >> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
> > > 
> > > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
> > > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
> > > Light is too fast. 
> > While at one time labratory grade equipment was needed to make such 
> > measurments, the equipment became hobby grade many decades ago.
> There isn't the slightest chance any of you science trolls have ever seen the inside of a laboratory.

Go back to the lab you nerd and measure something...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859106

FromJim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date2022-08-08 12:56 -0700
Message-ID<3d68si-v9hn1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to#859101
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:46:10 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> >> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> > IN a medium it is still too fast... 
>> >> > to cross it and therefore to fast 
>> >> > to measure. 
>> >> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
>> > 
>> > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
>> > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
>> > Light is too fast.
>> While at one time labratory grade equipment was needed to make such 
>> measurments, the equipment became hobby grade many decades ago.
> 
> There isn't the slightest chance any of you science trolls have ever seen the inside of a laboratory.

Says the delusionally insane crackpot that refuses to read all books,
including dictionaries.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859585

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2022-08-09 00:56 +0200
Message-ID<12047540.O9o76ZdvQC@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#859037
Jim Pennino wrote:

> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>> > IN a medium it is still too fast...
>>> > to cross it and therefore to fast
>>> > to measure.
>>> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when
>>> it comes to looking stuff up for yourself...
>> 
>> How could you measure light pass through a glass medium?
>> Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not.
>> Light is too fast.
> 
> While at one time labratory grade equipment was needed to make such
> measurments, the equipment became hobby grade many decades ago.

I do not think so.

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ys_yKGNFRQ> p.

Note that what you see there is the portion of the light that is partially 
scattered into the camera lens as the electromagnetic wave is propagating 
laterally through the bottle at the same time.


PointedEars
-- 
Two neutrinos go through a bar ...

(from: WolframAlpha)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859595

FromJim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date2022-08-15 07:52 -0700
Message-ID<f63qsi-j8eg.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to#859585
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > IN a medium it is still too fast...
>>>> > to cross it and therefore to fast
>>>> > to measure.
>>>> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when
>>>> it comes to looking stuff up for yourself...
>>> 
>>> How could you measure light pass through a glass medium?
>>> Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not.
>>> Light is too fast.
>> 
>> While at one time labratory grade equipment was needed to make such
>> measurments, the equipment became hobby grade many decades ago.
> 
> I do not think so.
> 
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ys_yKGNFRQ> p.
> 
> Note that what you see there is the portion of the light that is partially 
> scattered into the camera lens as the electromagnetic wave is propagating 
> laterally through the bottle at the same time.

One does not need to photograph light to measure the speed of light.

All one needs is a oscilloscope with a sweep speed in picoseconds, a
couple of fast photodectors and a pulsed light source. A beamsplitter
would be handy.

When I said "hobby grade", I meant equipment easily affordable on a
hobbiest budget.

When 'scopes that fast became available in the 70s they cost tens of
thousands of dollars but have been available for well under $100 as
surplus for a very long time now.

Case in point: I have a 'scope that when new cost roughly $20k which I
bought about a decade ago for $25.


> PointedEars

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859072

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2022-08-08 10:59 -0500
Message-ID<tcrbtr$7ep$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#859035
On 8/7/2022 6:48 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> IN a medium it is still too fast...
>>> to cross it and therefore to fast
>>> to measure.
>> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself...
> 
> How could you measure light pass through a glass medium?
> Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not.
> Light is too fast.

light travels only  1 foot in 1 nanosecond.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859078

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-08 10:26 -0700
Message-ID<7b80dcd4-b523-4349-ab22-3fbf72f3c21en@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859072
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 9:00:01 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> On 8/7/2022 6:48 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >> 
> >>> IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> >>> to cross it and therefore to fast 
> >>> to measure. 
> >> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
> > 
> > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
> > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
> > Light is too fast.
> light travels only 1 foot in 1 nanosecond.

And how do we measure that?

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859087

FromJim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date2022-08-08 11:27 -0700
Message-ID<k518si-75an1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to#859078
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 9:00:01 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> On 8/7/2022 6:48 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> >> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >>> IN a medium it is still too fast... 
>> >>> to cross it and therefore to fast 
>> >>> to measure. 
>> >> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
>> > 
>> > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
>> > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
>> > Light is too fast.
>> light travels only 1 foot in 1 nanosecond.
> 
> And how do we measure that?

Have you ever heard of an oscilloscope, invented 1897?


> Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#859098

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2022-08-08 12:29 -0700
Message-ID<fdf1cddd-108b-4a75-9d45-af45a2ebabbdn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#859087
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 9:00:01 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: 
> >> On 8/7/2022 6:48 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >> > On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:37:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >> >> On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 1:35:43 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >> >> 
> >> >>> IN a medium it is still too fast... 
> >> >>> to cross it and therefore to fast 
> >> >>> to measure. 
> >> >> Are you sure about this, Mitch? Once again you are an utter failure when it comes to looking stuff up for yourself... 
> >> > 
> >> > How could you measure light pass through a glass medium? 
> >> > Science just likes to believe it is doing most things where it is not. 
> >> > Light is too fast. 
> >> light travels only 1 foot in 1 nanosecond. 
> > 
> > And how do we measure that?
> Have you ever heard of an oscilloscope, invented 1897? 

How does an oscilloscope do the measurement of light?
Put up or Shut up...

Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> 
> > Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web