Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #892809 > unrolled thread

Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-20 23:19 +0000
    Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century x <x@x.org> - 2025-05-20 21:48 -0700
      Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-05-21 15:33 +1000
        Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-21 21:54 +0000
      Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-21 12:45 +0000
        Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century x <x@x.org> - 2025-05-21 12:14 -0700
          Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-21 21:58 +0000
        Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century x <x@x.org> - 2025-05-21 13:17 -0700
          Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-22 02:23 +0000
        Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-22 09:41 +0200
          Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-05-22 07:47 +0000
      Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> - 2025-05-21 22:59 -0600
        Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-05-22 15:54 +1000
          Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-22 06:08 +0000
        Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-22 06:05 +0000
    Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-05-21 08:05 +0200
      Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-05-21 16:34 +1000
        Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2025-05-21 09:18 +0000
          Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-21 22:53 +0000
      Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-05-21 08:35 +0000
        Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-05-21 11:11 +0200
          Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-21 21:46 +0000
    Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-21 10:20 +0200
      Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-05-22 07:54 +0000
        Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-23 09:59 +0200
          Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-23 10:30 +0000
            Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-23 10:34 -0700
              Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-23 14:32 -0500
              Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-24 00:59 +0000
          Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-23 10:29 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#892825

On 21/05/2025 10:35, Bertietaylor wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2025 6:05:44 +0000, occam wrote:
> 
>> On 21/05/2025 01:19, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>> Interesting outcome of your thought put
>>> in some Hindi film - the heroine is strapped to a chair with wires
>>> around her and the villain has pulled the switch to electrocute her from
>>> a far away point. The hero mounts his horse and gallops off to save her.
>>> The current charges as you have it move along the wire! The horse
>>> gallops even faster! At the last moment the hero manages to chop off the
>>> wire to save the heroine and the current slowly falls to the ground.
>>
>>
>> And therein lies the proof of Arindam's Theory of Everything.
> 
> Dull apes, this occam entity. Still it responds, does not killfile us 

Arindam-baiting is one of the few pleasures left for me, since they
outlawed bear-baiting, cock-fighting and other medieval pastimes.


Woof, woof, etc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892832

On Wed, 21 May 2025 9:11:26 +0000, occam wrote:

> On 21/05/2025 10:35, Bertietaylor wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 May 2025 6:05:44 +0000, occam wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/05/2025 01:19, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>>> Interesting outcome of your thought put
>>>> in some Hindi film - the heroine is strapped to a chair with wires
>>>> around her and the villain has pulled the switch to electrocute her from
>>>> a far away point. The hero mounts his horse and gallops off to save her.
>>>> The current charges as you have it move along the wire! The horse
>>>> gallops even faster! At the last moment the hero manages to chop off the
>>>> wire to save the heroine and the current slowly falls to the ground.
>>>
>>>
>>> And therein lies the proof of Arindam's Theory of Everything.
>>
>> Dull apes, this occam entity. Still it responds, does not killfile us
>
> Arindam-baiting is one of the few pleasures left for me, since they
> outlawed bear-baiting, cock-fighting and other medieval pastimes.

Good. Keep it up. We doggies will continue with our propaganda.

May Trump's wannabe killers always be incompetent and get killed
instead.

May the entire Einsteinian physics community get sacked.

May they sing Arindam's songs that are superior by far to the Beatles.

May the Orange One beseech Arindam to give lectures in various fields.

May the rest of the world follow in that.

May Arindam's company HTN Research as a consequence become a multi
quintillion dollar company over the years, expanding to the stars.

Woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor -the celestial cyberdogs of Arindam (bin Einstein ban
Gandhi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time and sole god among lotsa
devils.

>
>
> Woof, woof, etc.

Woof

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892823

Am Mittwoch000021, 21.05.2025 um 01:19 schrieb Bertitaylor:
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 6:15:59 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 13:54 schrieb rhertz:
>>> On Mon, 19 May 2025 3:42:07 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>
>>>> "We often hear the argument that the justness of application of
>>>> quantum mechanics lies in the great accuracy of its math calculations.
>>>> But in fact, the quantum mechanics so as was the Ptolemay epicycles
>>>> is a procedure for finding of mathematical construction to the existing
>>>> experimental data which this mathematics has to arrive at. We can
>>>> always find the mathematical relationships that describe experimental
>>>> data or, if not, we can construct a new mathematics to describe the
>>>> experimental data. But finding such mathematical constructions
>>>> (theories) do not confirm the veracity of the basic physical principles
>>>> (models) upon which these construction are based."
>>>
>>> Like SR and Lorentz applied to particle accelerators. It's A FACT that
>>> SR has been "validated" in linear and circular CHARGED particle
>>> accelerators, but ONLY to speeds lower than 0.3 c. From this limit up to
>>> near c, the calculations are made BASED ON THE DETECTED ENERGY OF
>>> CHARGED PARTICLES.
>>>
>>> Physics DENY the fact that are dealing with CHARGED PARTICLES, and that
>>> the energy transfer between accelerators and particles could be limited
>>> JUST by the speed at which the EM electric fields can accelerate
>>> particles. It's highly possible that such action IS NOT RELATED TO SR,
>>> but to limits at which accelerating energy can be transferred to
>>> particles, in a way that formulae ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE FROM SR.
>>>
>>> To mention the above possibility is considered heretic in the physics
>>> community, which is married to relativity like devote socialists or
>>> communists are married to the concepts of POPULISM. Every thing else is
>>> just FAR RIGHT. That's the way the world has been functioning for the
>>> last 140 years (politics and economy).
>>
>> I have the same impression because tons of people called me 'Nazi'
>> because I dared to question certain assumptions.
> 
> What has Nazism to do with physics? Nazism is about nationalism and
> socialism.

Actually: nothing.

But 'Nazi' is used as handy insult against anything unwanted, German 
and/or dissident.

So people called me 'Nazi' several times, just because I dared to 
question Einstein's SRT.

Apparently this was justified, because Einstein was a German Jew.

But that is wrong, because I actually think, that 'Einstein' was a fake 
identity of a Jesuit from Switzerland.

I would not call myself 'Nazi', because I'm actually too 'left' and too 
middle class (what both were the characteristics, which were most hated 
by the Nazis).

TH


...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892845

On Wed, 21 May 2025 8:20:31 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

> Am Mittwoch000021, 21.05.2025 um 01:19 schrieb Bertitaylor:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2025 6:15:59 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>
>>> Am Montag000019, 19.05.2025 um 13:54 schrieb rhertz:
>>>> On Mon, 19 May 2025 3:42:07 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "We often hear the argument that the justness of application of
>>>>> quantum mechanics lies in the great accuracy of its math calculations.
>>>>> But in fact, the quantum mechanics so as was the Ptolemay epicycles
>>>>> is a procedure for finding of mathematical construction to the existing
>>>>> experimental data which this mathematics has to arrive at. We can
>>>>> always find the mathematical relationships that describe experimental
>>>>> data or, if not, we can construct a new mathematics to describe the
>>>>> experimental data. But finding such mathematical constructions
>>>>> (theories) do not confirm the veracity of the basic physical principles
>>>>> (models) upon which these construction are based."
>>>>
>>>> Like SR and Lorentz applied to particle accelerators. It's A FACT that
>>>> SR has been "validated" in linear and circular CHARGED particle
>>>> accelerators, but ONLY to speeds lower than 0.3 c. From this limit up to
>>>> near c, the calculations are made BASED ON THE DETECTED ENERGY OF
>>>> CHARGED PARTICLES.
>>>>
>>>> Physics DENY the fact that are dealing with CHARGED PARTICLES, and that
>>>> the energy transfer between accelerators and particles could be limited
>>>> JUST by the speed at which the EM electric fields can accelerate
>>>> particles. It's highly possible that such action IS NOT RELATED TO SR,
>>>> but to limits at which accelerating energy can be transferred to
>>>> particles, in a way that formulae ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE FROM SR.
>>>>
>>>> To mention the above possibility is considered heretic in the physics
>>>> community, which is married to relativity like devote socialists or
>>>> communists are married to the concepts of POPULISM. Every thing else is
>>>> just FAR RIGHT. That's the way the world has been functioning for the
>>>> last 140 years (politics and economy).
>>>
>>> I have the same impression because tons of people called me 'Nazi'
>>> because I dared to question certain assumptions.
>>
>> What has Nazism to do with physics? Nazism is about nationalism and
>> socialism.
>
> Actually: nothing.

True
>
> But 'Nazi' is used as handy insult against anything unwanted, German
> and/or dissident.

Yes especially for someone strict. Like the term grammarnazi.
>
> So people called me 'Nazi' several times, just because I dared to
> question Einstein's SRT.

That rubbish was ridiculed by Nazis who called it Jewish physics. Yes it
is perilous to ridicule e=mcc for then they will label you a Nazi. So
Arindam had often been termed a Nazi although he is an honorary Soviet.
>
> Apparently this was justified, because Einstein was a German Jew.

Wasn't he?
>
> But that is wrong, because I actually think, that 'Einstein' was a fake
> identity of a Jesuit from Switzerland.

No one brought up by Jesuits would have any use for the unethical
relativity nonsenses that naturally breed immorality.
>
> I would not call myself 'Nazi', because I'm actually too 'left' and too
> middle class (what both were the characteristics, which were most hated
> by the Nazis).

But Nazis created the middle class what with labour reforms and
technology.

WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor
>
> TH
>
>
> ....

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892850

Am Donnerstag000022, 22.05.2025 um 09:54 schrieb Bertietaylor:
...
>>>> I have the same impression because tons of people called me 'Nazi'
>>>> because I dared to question certain assumptions.
>>>
>>> What has Nazism to do with physics? Nazism is about nationalism and
>>> socialism.
>>
>> Actually: nothing.
> 
> True
>>
>> But 'Nazi' is used as handy insult against anything unwanted, German
>> and/or dissident.
> 
> Yes especially for someone strict. Like the term grammarnazi.
>>
>> So people called me 'Nazi' several times, just because I dared to
>> question Einstein's SRT.
> 
> That rubbish was ridiculed by Nazis who called it Jewish physics. Yes it
> is perilous to ridicule e=mcc for then they will label you a Nazi. So
> Arindam had often been termed a Nazi although he is an honorary Soviet.
>>
>> Apparently this was justified, because Einstein was a German Jew.
> 
> Wasn't he?

He was offered presidency of Israel and declined.

My guess: he wasn't circumcised and afraid, somebody could find out.

>>
>> But that is wrong, because I actually think, that 'Einstein' was a fake
>> identity of a Jesuit from Switzerland.
> 
> No one brought up by Jesuits would have any use for the unethical
> relativity nonsenses that naturally breed immorality.
>>
>> I would not call myself 'Nazi', because I'm actually too 'left' and too
>> middle class (what both were the characteristics, which were most hated
>> by the Nazis).
> 
> But Nazis created the middle class what with labour reforms and
> technology.
> 
Actually not, because 'middle class' stems from the British 
three-class-system and means actually the same as 'capitalist' or 
'bourgeois'.

Since the Nazis were actually also socialists, they were primarily 
anti-middle-class.

They put them into 'Arbeitsdienst', in to the frontlines of war or 
called them 'Jew' and exterminated them.

In most cases they were ripped off.


TH

> -- 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892853

Looks like before Hitler Germans were mostly third class lowlife after
aristocracy and capitalists.

WOOF woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892860

Bertitaylor wrote:
> 
> Looks like before Hitler Germans were mostly third class lowlife after
> aristocracy and capitalists.
> 
> WOOF woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
> 
> Bertietaylor
> 
> --

Have you seen Putin's house...inside?

https://www.google.com/search?q=putin%27s+house+inside

I think Putin wants to move to Beverly Hills California...and shop at
Rodeo Drive.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892863

On 5/23/25 12:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Have you seen Putin's house...inside?



Have you ever seen Putin's wife?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892864

On Fri, 23 May 2025 17:34:10 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> Bertitaylor wrote:
>>
>> Looks like before Hitler Germans were mostly third class lowlife after
>> aristocracy and capitalists.
>>
>> WOOF woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
>>
>> Bertietaylor
>>
>> --
>
> Have you seen Putin's house...inside?

I would very much like to be invited there.
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=putin%27s+house+inside
>
> I think Putin wants to move to Beverly Hills California...and shop at
> Rodeo Drive.

I don't think so. He would like to shubhapaddle on Lake Baikal instead.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

Bertietaylor
>

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#892859

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Donnerstag000022, 22.05.2025 um 09:54 schrieb Bertietaylor:
> ...
> >>>> I have the same impression because tons of people called me 'Nazi'
> >>>> because I dared to question certain assumptions.
> >>>
> >>> What has Nazism to do with physics? Nazism is about nationalism and
> >>> socialism.
> >>
> >> Actually: nothing.
> >
> > True
> >>
> >> But 'Nazi' is used as handy insult against anything unwanted, German
> >> and/or dissident.
> >
> > Yes especially for someone strict. Like the term grammarnazi.
> >>
> >> So people called me 'Nazi' several times, just because I dared to
> >> question Einstein's SRT.
> >
> > That rubbish was ridiculed by Nazis who called it Jewish physics. Yes it
> > is perilous to ridicule e=mcc for then they will label you a Nazi. So
> > Arindam had often been termed a Nazi although he is an honorary Soviet.
> >>
> >> Apparently this was justified, because Einstein was a German Jew.
> >
> > Wasn't he?
> 
> He was offered presidency of Israel and declined.
> 
> My guess: he wasn't circumcised and afraid, somebody could find out.
> 
> >>
> >> But that is wrong, because I actually think, that 'Einstein' was a fake
> >> identity of a Jesuit from Switzerland.
> >
> > No one brought up by Jesuits would have any use for the unethical
> > relativity nonsenses that naturally breed immorality.
> >>
> >> I would not call myself 'Nazi', because I'm actually too 'left' and too
> >> middle class (what both were the characteristics, which were most hated
> >> by the Nazis).
> >
> > But Nazis created the middle class what with labour reforms and
> > technology.
> >
> Actually not, because 'middle class' stems from the British
> three-class-system and means actually the same as 'capitalist' or
> 'bourgeois'.
> 
> Since the Nazis were actually also socialists, they were primarily
> anti-middle-class.
> 
> They put them into 'Arbeitsdienst', in to the frontlines of war or
> called them 'Jew' and exterminated them.
> 
> In most cases they were ripped off.
> 
> TH
> 
> > --


I'm not German but I LOVE Aldolph Hitler! does that make me a nazi? 

You have to look at the good things he has done...he tried to get rid of
the people everyone else in the world has tried to get rid of.


He bombed the British!


THE BRITISH ARE COMING! THE BRITISH ARE COMING! THE BRITISH ARE COMING! THE BRITISH ARE COMING! THE BRITISH ARE COMING! THE BRITISH ARE COMING!


if i'm not mistaken, i think he tried to get rid of the faggets first?

Then he tried to kill Einstein and all his scientists friends...it's apparent that he recognized scientists don't make a better world and
are simply suffering from some sort of genetic defect that compels them to build...FRANKENSTEINS!







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web