Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #891091 > unrolled thread

Re: My Hate List (Revised)

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 13:41 -0600
    Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-04 01:59 +0000
    Re: My Hate List (Revised) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-04 18:21 -0800
      Re: My Hate List (Revised) pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-05 03:08 +0000
      Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 22:21 -0600
        Re: My Hate List (Revised) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-04 21:22 -0800
          Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 23:38 -0600
            Re: My Hate List (Revised) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-05 00:24 -0800
              Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-05 08:40 -0500
                Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-06 08:10 +0100
                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-06 08:45 -0500
                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 13:06 -0600
                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-07 08:12 +0100
              Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-05 13:16 -0500
                Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-06 08:12 +0100
                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 02:27 -0500
                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-06 08:46 -0500
                      Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 09:59 -0500
                        Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-06 10:18 -0500
                          Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 10:38 -0500
                            Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-06 11:17 -0500
                              Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 11:49 -0500
                      Re: My Hate List (Revised) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-06 14:08 -0800
                        Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 17:35 -0600
                          Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 17:50 -0600
                            Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 18:31 -0600
                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-07 00:20 +0000
                      Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-06 19:34 -0500
                      (OT) John 1:1 (was: Re: My Hate List (Revised)) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-07 01:32 +0000
                        Re: (OT) John 1:1 % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 19:07 -0700
                          Re: (OT) John 1:1 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-07 02:49 +0000
                            Re: (OT) John 1:1 % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 20:01 -0700
                Re: My Hate List (Revised) x <x@x.org> - 2025-02-07 05:49 -0800
                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:48 -0500
                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 11:29 -0500
                      Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 20:11 -0500
                        Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 20:30 -0500
                          Re: My Hate List (Revised) pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-08 01:57 +0000
                            Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 21:09 -0500
                              Re: My Hate List (Revised) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-02-08 05:03 -0500
                            Re: My Hate List (Revised) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-07 20:53 -0800
                              Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 00:05 -0500
                          Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 22:08 -0500
                            Re: My Hate List (Revised) pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-08 03:19 +0000
                              Re: My Hate List (Revised) % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 20:20 -0700
                              Re: My Hate List (Revised) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-08 09:02 -0500
              Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-05 12:18 -0600
                Re: My Hate List (Revised) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-05 11:45 -0800
                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-05 15:03 -0600
                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-05 13:57 -0800
                      Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-05 16:37 -0600
                        Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-05 16:56 -0600
              Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-06 07:32 +0000
                Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 02:45 -0500
                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-06 07:52 +0000
                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 03:33 -0500
                Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-07 07:46 +0100
                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-07 15:24 +0000
                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 12:53 -0600
                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 11:58 -0700
                      Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 14:14 -0600
                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-09 08:30 +0100
                      Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-09 09:06 +0000
                        Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 21:16 -0600
                          Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-10 03:45 +0000
                            Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 17:04 -0600
                              Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-11 00:50 +0000
                                Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 14:52 -0600
                                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-13 01:40 +0000
                          Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-10 09:16 +0100
                            Re: My Hate List (Revised) Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-10 15:21 +0100
                        Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-10 08:59 +0100
                          Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-10 08:21 +0000
                      Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 21:09 -0600
                        Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-10 09:13 +0100
                          Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 16:43 -0600
                            Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-11 09:33 +0100
                              Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 10:23 -0600
                                Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-12 08:40 +0100
                                  Re: My Hate List (Revised) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-12 07:18 -0600
                                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 14:56 -0600
                                    Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-13 08:11 +0100
                              Re: My Hate List (Revised) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 09:50 -0800
                                Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-12 08:42 +0100
                      Re: My Hate List (Revised) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-10 08:36 +0100
            Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-05 16:03 -0600
          Re: My Hate List (Revised) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-05 07:49 +0000
    Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 13:32 -0600
    Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: My Hate List (Revised)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 17:23 +0100
      Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: My Hate List (Revised)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 10:58 -0600
        Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: My Hate List (Revised)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 18:06 +0100
    Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 13:45 -0600
    Re: My Hate List (Revised) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 14:48 -0600

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

#891223

On 2025-02-06 10:38 a.m., Joel wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> 
>>>>> Hitler and DJT aren't precisely the same person, but it's a mistake to
>>>>> think that Donald is another Jesus, his credentials are of a crude-
>>>>> meth-using Aryan the better part of 100 years ago, the only thing
>>>>> special about it is the same thing Hitler himself wanted to believe,
>>>>> that the first to conquer it all with meth was a special place in the
>>>>> game, not disputing that at all, but a lot of decades have passed
>>>>> since the Hitler era, and a lot of people are equally or more
>>>>> powerful.  This is why Trump is the "antichrist", he's a faux Jesus,
>>>>> not having the inner makeup of the real thing.
>>>>
>>>> Nowadays, calling Trump Hitler is basically admitting that you're
>>>> mentally ill.
>>>
>>> Do you doubt reincarnation?
>>
>> Do I smell like excrement and look Hindu to you?
> 
> 
> So that's the issue, it's not spelled out explicitly in the Bible? But
> the crap about sacrificing doves because of an irregular menstrual
> period doesn't call into question, how seriously we should take it as
> a guide to modern living?

Opening it from time to time might weaken the demon inside of you who 
has made you hungry for cock.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891224

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>>>>> Nowadays, calling Trump Hitler is basically admitting that you're
>>>>> mentally ill.
>>>>
>>>> Do you doubt reincarnation?
>>>
>>> Do I smell like excrement and look Hindu to you?
>> 
>> So that's the issue, it's not spelled out explicitly in the Bible? But
>> the crap about sacrificing doves because of an irregular menstrual
>> period doesn't call into question, how seriously we should take it as
>> a guide to modern living?
>
>Opening it from time to time might weaken the demon inside of you who 
>has made you hungry for cock.


I really am not with my GF because she has a cock - I like it, yes,
but I like *her*, the person.  Trans women are intriguing people.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891227

CrudeSausage wrote:
> 
> On 2025-02-06 2:27 a.m., Joel wrote:
> > Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
> >
> >>>> A lot of people call Trump Hitler...
> >>>
> >>> Reincarnated, yes.
> >>>
> >>>> and he won the majority vote in the
> >>>> United States, I guess people love Hitler.
> >>>
> >>> They don't all know who he really is.
> >>
> >> https://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Britischer-Solving-History-German/dp/0985227818
> >>
> >> (my guess: the real name of this agent was 'Noel Trevenen Huxley').
> >
> >
> > Hitler and DJT aren't precisely the same person, but it's a mistake to
> > think that Donald is another Jesus, his credentials are of a crude-
> > meth-using Aryan the better part of 100 years ago, the only thing
> > special about it is the same thing Hitler himself wanted to believe,
> > that the first to conquer it all with meth was a special place in the
> > game, not disputing that at all, but a lot of decades have passed
> > since the Hitler era, and a lot of people are equally or more
> > powerful.  This is why Trump is the "antichrist", he's a faux Jesus,
> > not having the inner makeup of the real thing.
> 
> Nowadays, calling Trump Hitler is basically admitting that you're
> mentally ill.

There are people who believe you should not call Hitler, Hitler!




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891229

On 2/6/25 4:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> CrudeSausage wrote:
>>
>> On 2025-02-06 2:27 a.m., Joel wrote:
>>> Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> A lot of people call Trump Hitler...
>>>>>
>>>>> Reincarnated, yes.
>>>>>
>>>>>> and he won the majority vote in the
>>>>>> United States, I guess people love Hitler.
>>>>>
>>>>> They don't all know who he really is.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Britischer-Solving-History-German/dp/0985227818
>>>>
>>>> (my guess: the real name of this agent was 'Noel Trevenen Huxley').
>>>
>>>
>>> Hitler and DJT aren't precisely the same person, but it's a mistake to
>>> think that Donald is another Jesus, his credentials are of a crude-
>>> meth-using Aryan the better part of 100 years ago, the only thing
>>> special about it is the same thing Hitler himself wanted to believe,
>>> that the first to conquer it all with meth was a special place in the
>>> game, not disputing that at all, but a lot of decades have passed
>>> since the Hitler era, and a lot of people are equally or more
>>> powerful.  This is why Trump is the "antichrist", he's a faux Jesus,
>>> not having the inner makeup of the real thing.
>>
>> Nowadays, calling Trump Hitler is basically admitting that you're
>> mentally ill.
> 
> There are people who believe you should not call Hitler, Hitler!
> 
> 
> 
> 

Amen :)

Forget that sausage head. He's a sub-85 IQ. This is my impression of his 
son :)  Hahhahhahhahhahh :-))

https://streamable.com/lza1re

 From there, extrapolate backward to see what kind of father you land on.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891232

On 2/6/25 5:35 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 2/6/25 4:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2025-02-06 2:27 a.m., Joel wrote:
>>>> Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> A lot of people call Trump Hitler...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reincarnated, yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and he won the majority vote in the
>>>>>>> United States, I guess people love Hitler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They don't all know who he really is.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Britischer-Solving-History-German/dp/0985227818
>>>>>
>>>>> (my guess: the real name of this agent was 'Noel Trevenen Huxley').
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hitler and DJT aren't precisely the same person, but it's a mistake to
>>>> think that Donald is another Jesus, his credentials are of a crude-
>>>> meth-using Aryan the better part of 100 years ago, the only thing
>>>> special about it is the same thing Hitler himself wanted to believe,
>>>> that the first to conquer it all with meth was a special place in the
>>>> game, not disputing that at all, but a lot of decades have passed
>>>> since the Hitler era, and a lot of people are equally or more
>>>> powerful.  This is why Trump is the "antichrist", he's a faux Jesus,
>>>> not having the inner makeup of the real thing.
>>>
>>> Nowadays, calling Trump Hitler is basically admitting that you're
>>> mentally ill.
>>
>> There are people who believe you should not call Hitler, Hitler!
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Amen :)
> 
> Forget that sausage head. He's a sub-85 IQ. This is my impression of his 
> son :)  Hahhahhahhahhahh :-))
> 
> https://streamable.com/lza1re
> 
>  From there, extrapolate backward to see what kind of father you land on.
> 
> 
> 
> 


Either his son or "DFS"s. I mean he just has to be the son of one of 
these COLA idiots. Hahhahhahhahh :-))))

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891234

On 2/6/25 5:50 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 2/6/25 5:35 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 2/6/25 4:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-02-06 2:27 a.m., Joel wrote:
>>>>> Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A lot of people call Trump Hitler...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reincarnated, yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and he won the majority vote in the
>>>>>>>> United States, I guess people love Hitler.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They don't all know who he really is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Britischer-Solving-History-German/dp/0985227818
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (my guess: the real name of this agent was 'Noel Trevenen Huxley').
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hitler and DJT aren't precisely the same person, but it's a mistake to
>>>>> think that Donald is another Jesus, his credentials are of a crude-
>>>>> meth-using Aryan the better part of 100 years ago, the only thing
>>>>> special about it is the same thing Hitler himself wanted to believe,
>>>>> that the first to conquer it all with meth was a special place in the
>>>>> game, not disputing that at all, but a lot of decades have passed
>>>>> since the Hitler era, and a lot of people are equally or more
>>>>> powerful.  This is why Trump is the "antichrist", he's a faux Jesus,
>>>>> not having the inner makeup of the real thing.
>>>>
>>>> Nowadays, calling Trump Hitler is basically admitting that you're
>>>> mentally ill.
>>>
>>> There are people who believe you should not call Hitler, Hitler!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Amen :)
>>
>> Forget that sausage head. He's a sub-85 IQ. This is my impression of 
>> his son :)  Hahhahhahhahhahh :-))
>>
>> https://streamable.com/lza1re
>>
>>  From there, extrapolate backward to see what kind of father you land on.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Either his son or "DFS"s. I mean he just has to be the son of one of 
> these COLA idiots. Hahhahhahhahh :-))))
> 
> 


Now, how about Carpentier in COLA?.. Oh I have less doubt in the 
accuracy of the impression of him I have in my mind.

https://streamable.com/0hahh6

:-)

Hahhahhahhahh :-))))))

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891233

On 2025-02-06, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
>
>>>> A lot of people call Trump Hitler...
>>> 
>>> Reincarnated, yes.
>>> 
>>>> and he won the majority vote in the
>>>> United States, I guess people love Hitler.
>>> 
>>> They don't all know who he really is.
>>
>>https://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Britischer-Solving-History-German/dp/0985227818
>>
>>(my guess: the real name of this agent was 'Noel Trevenen Huxley').
>
>
> Hitler and DJT aren't precisely the same person, but it's a mistake to
> think that Donald is another Jesus, his credentials are of a crude-
> meth-using Aryan the better part of 100 years ago, the only thing
> special about it is the same thing Hitler himself wanted to believe,
> that the first to conquer it all with meth was a special place in the
> game, not disputing that at all, but a lot of decades have passed
> since the Hitler era, and a lot of people are equally or more
> powerful.  This is why Trump is the "antichrist", he's a faux Jesus,
> not having the inner makeup of the real thing.
>

You claim to be Jesus so wouldn't you know for certain?

As for biblical references, here are a few, comments? :
<https://bibleask.org/is-trump-the-antichrist/>

'The Bible Identifies the Antichrist
The little horn would come “up among them”—that is, from among the 10 horns that were the kingdoms of Western Europe (Daniel 7:8). So, it would be a little kingdom in Western Europe.
It would have a man at its head who could speak for it (Daniel 7:8).
It would pluck out or uproot three kingdoms (Daniel 7:8).
It would be different from the other 10 kingdoms (Daniel 7:24).
It would make war with and persecute the saints (Daniel 7:21, 25).
It would emerge from the pagan Roman Empire—the fourth kingdom (Daniel 7:7, 8).
God’s people (the saints) would “be given into his hand” for “a time and times and half a time” (Daniel 7:25).
It would “speak great words against” or blaspheme God (Daniel 7:25). In Revelation 13:5, the Bible says the same power speaks “great things and blasphemies.”
It would “intend to change times and law” (Daniel 7:25).
Historians tell us that these points fit only one power—the papacy. Let us examine all nine points to see if this is true:

It came up among the 10 kingdoms of Western Europe.
The geographical location of the papal power is in Rome, Italy—in Western Europe.
It would have a man at its head who speaks for it.
The papacy does have one man at the head—the pope—who speaks for it.
Three kingdoms were plucked up to make way for the rise of the papacy.
The emperors of Western Europe were largely Catholic and supported the papacy. Three Arian kingdoms, however, did not—the Vandals, Heruli, and Ostrogoths. So, the Catholic emperors subdued them.
It would be different from the other kingdoms.
The papacy rose as a religious power and was different from the secular nature of the other 10 kingdoms.
It would make war with and persecute the saints. Historians believe the church destroyed at least 50 million lives over matters of religious conviction [History of Romanism, pages 541, 542]
It would emerge from the fourth kingdom of iron—the pagan Roman Empire.
The very capital of the old Roman Empire became the capital of the Christian empire. The office of Pontifex Maximus was continued in that of the pope
God’s people (the saints) would “be given into his hand” for “a time and times and half a time.”
Please note:
1. A time is a year, times is two years, and half a time is half of a year. The Amplified Bible translates it: “Three and one-half years.”
2. This same time period is mentioned seven times in the books of Daniel and Revelation (Daniel 7:25; 12:7; Revelation 11:2, 3; 12:6, 14; 13:5): three times as a “time, times, and half a time”; twice as 42 months; and twice as 1,260 days. Based on the 30-day calendar used by the Jews, these time periods are all the same amount of time: 3½ years = 42 months = 1,260 days.
3. One prophetic day equals one literal year (Ezekiel 4:6; Numbers 14:34).
4. Thus, the little horn (Antichrist) was to have power over the saints for 1,260 prophetic days; that is, 1,260 literal years.
5. The rule of the papacy started in AD 538, when the last of the three opposing Arian kingdoms was uprooted. Its rule continued until 1798 when Napoleon’s general, Berthier, took the pope captive with hopes of destroying both Pope Pius VI and the political power of the papacy. This period of time is an exact fulfillment of the 1,260-year prophecy. The blow was a deadly wound for the papacy, but that wound began to heal and continues healing today.
6. This same period of persecution is mentioned in Matthew 24:21 as the worst period of persecution God’s people experience. Verse 22 tells us it was so devastating that not one soul would have survived if God had not shortened it. But God did shorten it. The persecution ended long before the pope was taken captive in 1798.

It would speak “pompous words” of blasphemy “against [God].” Blasphemy has two definitions in Scripture:
Claiming to forgive sins (Luke 5:21).
Claiming to be God (John 10:33).
The papacy claims to forgive sin: “Does the Priest truly forgive the sins, or does he only declare that they are remitted? The Priest does really and truly forgive the sins in virtue of the power given to him by Christ.” Joseph Deharbe, S.J., A Complete Catechism of the Catholic Religion (New York: Schwartz, Kirwin & Fauss, 1924), p. 279.

The papacy further undermines Jesus by setting up a system of confession to an earthly priest, thus bypassing Jesus, our High Priest (Hebrews 3:1 8:1, 2) and the only Mediator (1 Timothy 2:5).

Now consider the evidence for it claiming to be God: “The pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ, Himself, hidden under the veil of flesh.” Catholic National, July 1895.

It would “intend to change times and law.” In its catechisms, the papacy has omitted the second commandment against veneration of images and has shortened the fourth commandment from 94 words to eight and divided the tenth commandment into two commandments. (Compare the Ten Commandments in any Catholic catechism with God’s list of the commandments in Exodus 20:2-17).
There is no doubt that the little horn power (the Antichrist) of Daniel 7 is the papacy. No other organization fits all nine points. Every Protestant Reformer, without exception, spoke of the papacy as Antichrist. Trump doesn’t fulfill all of the above points.

A related topic:

Who is the first beast of Revelation 13?

In His service,
BibleAsk Team

Disclaimer:

The contents of this article and website are not intended to accuse individuals. There are many priests and faithful believers in Roman Catholicism who serve God to the best of their ability and are seen by God as His children. The information contained herein is directed only towards the Roman Catholic religio-political system that has reigned in varying degrees of power for nearly two millennia. Under the influence of its successive popes, bishops, and cardinals, this system has established an increasing number of doctrines and statements that clearly go against Scripture.

It is our sincere desire to lay the clear Word of God before you, the truth-seeking reader, so you may decide for yourself what is truth and what is error. If you find herein anything contrary to the Word of God, you need not accept it. But if you desire to seek for Truth as for hidden treasure, and find herein something of that quality, we encourage you to make all haste to accept that truth which is revealed to you by the Holy Spirit.'
-- 
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891235

On 2025-02-06 7:20 p.m., pothead wrote:
> On 2025-02-06, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

< snip >

> It would “intend to change times and law.” In its catechisms, the papacy has omitted the second commandment against veneration of images and has shortened the fourth commandment from 94 words to eight and divided the tenth commandment into two commandments. (Compare the Ten Commandments in any Catholic catechism with God’s list of the commandments in Exodus 20:2-17).
> There is no doubt that the little horn power (the Antichrist) of Daniel 7 is the papacy. No other organization fits all nine points. Every Protestant Reformer, without exception, spoke of the papacy as Antichrist. Trump doesn’t fulfill all of the above points.

I do believe that the papacy is the problem. Lucky, people are rejecting 
the fraud Francis.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891236 — (OT) John 1:1 (was: Re: My Hate List (Revised))

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:20:10 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
wrote in <vo3jjq$36bmj$1@dont-email.me>:

> It is our sincere desire to lay the clear Word of God before you, the
> truth-seeking reader, so you may decide for yourself what is truth and
> what is error.

When someone starts talking about "Word of God" -- with that
capitalization -- then you can be sure that they are Bibidolatrous.

"Word of God" is the /Logos/, and has been discussed in theology
and philosophy since at least 500 BCE.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos

It is not the Bible.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.13.1 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
   "A program without bugs is obsolete."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891237 — Re: (OT) John 1:1

vallor wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:20:10 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
> wrote in <vo3jjq$36bmj$1@dont-email.me>:
> 
>> It is our sincere desire to lay the clear Word of God before you, the
>> truth-seeking reader, so you may decide for yourself what is truth and
>> what is error.
> 
> When someone starts talking about "Word of God" -- with that
> capitalization -- then you can be sure that they are Bibidolatrous.
> 
> "Word of God" is the /Logos/, and has been discussed in theology
> and philosophy since at least 500 BCE.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos
> 
> It is not the Bible.
> 
i am

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891240 — Re: (OT) John 1:1

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:07:11 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
<E9ydnTLZOOZH9zj6nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com>:

> vallor wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:20:10 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>> <pothead@snakebite.com>
>> wrote in <vo3jjq$36bmj$1@dont-email.me>:
>> 
>>> It is our sincere desire to lay the clear Word of God before you, the
>>> truth-seeking reader, so you may decide for yourself what is truth and
>>> what is error.
>> 
>> When someone starts talking about "Word of God" -- with that
>> capitalization -- then you can be sure that they are Bibidolatrous.
>> 
>> "Word of God" is the /Logos/, and has been discussed in theology and
>> philosophy since at least 500 BCE.
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos
>> 
>> It is not the Bible.
>> 
> i am

Exodus 3:14 reference noted:

"And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say 
unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you."

Only: You aren't Him, Buster.

Get back on the off topic:  Bibidolatry from Bible-thumping weirdos.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.13.1 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
   "9 out of 10 serial killers own cats."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891241 — Re: (OT) John 1:1

vallor wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:07:11 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
> <E9ydnTLZOOZH9zj6nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com>:
> 
>> vallor wrote:
>>> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:20:10 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>>> <pothead@snakebite.com>
>>> wrote in <vo3jjq$36bmj$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>>> It is our sincere desire to lay the clear Word of God before you, the
>>>> truth-seeking reader, so you may decide for yourself what is truth and
>>>> what is error.
>>>
>>> When someone starts talking about "Word of God" -- with that
>>> capitalization -- then you can be sure that they are Bibidolatrous.
>>>
>>> "Word of God" is the /Logos/, and has been discussed in theology and
>>> philosophy since at least 500 BCE.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos
>>>
>>> It is not the Bible.
>>>
>> i am
> 
> Exodus 3:14 reference noted:
> 
> "And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say
> unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you."
> 
> Only: You aren't Him, Buster.
> 
> Get back on the off topic:  Bibidolatry from Bible-thumping weirdos.
> 
the topic is off topic

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891248

On 2/5/25 10:16, Joel wrote:
 > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
 >
 >> A lot of people call Trump Hitler...
 >
 >
 > Reincarnated, yes.
 >
 >
 >> and he won the majority vote in the
 >> United States, I guess people love Hitler.
 >
 >
 > They don't all know who he really is.

Yea, I guess Nostradamus supposedly
predicted 'three antichrists'.

I am thinking that many people have
gradually come to the idea that they were:

Napoleon Bonaparte
Adolph Hitler
Saddam Hussein

Now that they have come and gone then
everyone is patiently waiting to be raptured
by the supreme being, Satan, Napoleon Bonaparte?
Who knows?

Maybe everyone is not in agreement on that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891250

On 2025-02-07 8:49 a.m., x wrote:
> On 2/5/25 10:16, Joel wrote:
>  > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >> A lot of people call Trump Hitler...
>  >
>  >
>  > Reincarnated, yes.
>  >
>  >
>  >> and he won the majority vote in the
>  >> United States, I guess people love Hitler.
>  >
>  >
>  > They don't all know who he really is.
> 
> Yea, I guess Nostradamus supposedly
> predicted 'three antichrists'.
> 
> I am thinking that many people have
> gradually come to the idea that they were:
> 
> Napoleon Bonaparte
> Adolph Hitler
> Saddam Hussein
> 
> Now that they have come and gone then
> everyone is patiently waiting to be raptured
> by the supreme being, Satan, Napoleon Bonaparte?
> Who knows?
> 
> Maybe everyone is not in agreement on that.

His prediction was Mabus, not Saddam Hussein explicitly. There is no 
reason to believe Saddam Hussein had the power to even be a candidate 
for anti-Christ. I'm thinking something closer to Barack HUSsein ObaMA.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891254

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>On 2025-02-07 8:49 a.m., x wrote:
>> On 2/5/25 10:16, Joel wrote:
>>  > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>  >
>>  >> A lot of people call Trump Hitler...
>>  >
>>  > Reincarnated, yes.
>>  >
>>  >> and he won the majority vote in the
>>  >> United States, I guess people love Hitler.
>>  >
>>  > They don't all know who he really is.
>> 
>> Yea, I guess Nostradamus supposedly
>> predicted 'three antichrists'.
>> 
>> I am thinking that many people have
>> gradually come to the idea that they were:
>> 
>> Napoleon Bonaparte
>> Adolph Hitler
>> Saddam Hussein
>> 
>> Now that they have come and gone then
>> everyone is patiently waiting to be raptured
>> by the supreme being, Satan, Napoleon Bonaparte?
>> Who knows?
>> 
>> Maybe everyone is not in agreement on that.
>
>His prediction was Mabus, not Saddam Hussein explicitly. There is no 
>reason to believe Saddam Hussein had the power to even be a candidate 
>for anti-Christ. I'm thinking something closer to Barack HUSsein ObaMA.


Why is this not obvious, how would anyone but DJT be the antichrist?
It doesn't even imply he's a bad person as such, one can make their
own judgments on that, it implies that he's a potential replacement
for the real thing.  My attitude is that I don't see him as a
competitor to myself, I see him as a competitor *politically* more
broadly, but I can work with that, I can work with anyone with an open
mind.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891262

On 2025-02-07 11:29 a.m., Joel wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-02-07 8:49 a.m., x wrote:
>>> On 2/5/25 10:16, Joel wrote:
>>>   > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>   >
>>>   >> A lot of people call Trump Hitler...
>>>   >
>>>   > Reincarnated, yes.
>>>   >
>>>   >> and he won the majority vote in the
>>>   >> United States, I guess people love Hitler.
>>>   >
>>>   > They don't all know who he really is.
>>>
>>> Yea, I guess Nostradamus supposedly
>>> predicted 'three antichrists'.
>>>
>>> I am thinking that many people have
>>> gradually come to the idea that they were:
>>>
>>> Napoleon Bonaparte
>>> Adolph Hitler
>>> Saddam Hussein
>>>
>>> Now that they have come and gone then
>>> everyone is patiently waiting to be raptured
>>> by the supreme being, Satan, Napoleon Bonaparte?
>>> Who knows?
>>>
>>> Maybe everyone is not in agreement on that.
>>
>> His prediction was Mabus, not Saddam Hussein explicitly. There is no
>> reason to believe Saddam Hussein had the power to even be a candidate
>> for anti-Christ. I'm thinking something closer to Barack HUSsein ObaMA.
> 
> 
> Why is this not obvious, how would anyone but DJT be the antichrist?
> It doesn't even imply he's a bad person as such, one can make their
> own judgments on that, it implies that he's a potential replacement
> for the real thing.  My attitude is that I don't see him as a
> competitor to myself, I see him as a competitor *politically* more
> broadly, but I can work with that, I can work with anyone with an open
> mind.

How about you faggots let him fix the country and figure out if he's 
evil after he's done?

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891264

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>> Why is [it] not obvious, [that] DJT [is] the antichrist?
>> It doesn't even imply he's a bad person as such, one can make their
>> own judgments on that, it implies that he's a potential replacement
>> for the real thing.  My attitude is that I don't see him as a
>> competitor to myself, I see him as a competitor *politically* more
>> broadly, but I can work with that, I can work with anyone with an open
>> mind.
>
>How about you faggots let him fix the country and figure out if he's 
>evil after he's done?


Can you point to *anything* he's doing to "fix" anything in my
country?

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891265

On 2025-02-08, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
>>> Why is [it] not obvious, [that] DJT [is] the antichrist?
>>> It doesn't even imply he's a bad person as such, one can make their
>>> own judgments on that, it implies that he's a potential replacement
>>> for the real thing.  My attitude is that I don't see him as a
>>> competitor to myself, I see him as a competitor *politically* more
>>> broadly, but I can work with that, I can work with anyone with an open
>>> mind.
>>
>>How about you faggots let him fix the country and figure out if he's 
>>evil after he's done?
>
>
> Can you point to *anything* he's doing to "fix" anything in my
> country?
>
The border.
Deporting illegals.
Drilling for oil instead of purchasing from other countries.
Cleaning up government waste of taxpayer dollars.
etc.
The list is endless and Trump has only been in office 3 weeks.


-- 
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891266

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>> Can you point to *anything* [DJT is] doing to "fix" anything in my
>> country?
>>
>The border.


Oh, sure, just put some thugs with assault weapons along the border,
good idea.


>Deporting illegals.


It's an embarrassment how they've been going after people who didn't
warrant this scrutiny.


>Drilling for oil instead of purchasing from other countries.


<eye roll>


>Cleaning up government waste of taxpayer dollars.


Heh ...


>etc.
>The list is endless and Trump has only been in office 3 weeks.


You're a fuckin' groupie.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#891272

On 2/7/25 9:09 PM, Joel wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Can you point to *anything* [DJT is] doing to "fix" anything in my
>>> country?
>>>
>> The border.
> 
> 
> Oh, sure, just put some thugs with assault weapons along the border,
> good idea.
> 
> 
>> Deporting illegals.
> 
> 
> It's an embarrassment how they've been going after people who didn't
> warrant this scrutiny.

Latest from DOJ statement now claims that merely being an illegal can 
incur the death penalty.  Now you understand why Gitmo.


>> Drilling for oil instead of purchasing from other countries.
> 
> <eye roll>

Unless those foreign sources cut us off (or he tanks the Economy), we 
are still going to be buying foreign oil this time next year.

Because crude isn't as fungible as people think it is.


>> Cleaning up government waste of taxpayer dollars.
> 
> 
> Heh ...

Nothing found by DOGE so far - - just lots of "we don't LIKE this".


>> etc.
>> The list is endless and Trump has only been in office 3 weeks.
> 
> 
> You're a fuckin' groupie.

Who disregards Rule of Law.

-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web