Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #890936 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-01-27 11:55 -0800 |
| Last post | 2025-02-01 12:27 -0800 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 51 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 11:55 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 11:58 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 12:19 -0800
Re: DeepSeek hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-01-27 20:42 +0000
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 13:53 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 12:50 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 17:47 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 15:52 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 18:25 -0600
Re: DeepSeek hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-01-28 01:14 +0000
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 20:31 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 18:23 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 20:42 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 21:22 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 21:39 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 11:02 -0600
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 15:43 -0600
Re: DeepSeek hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-01-29 22:44 +0000
Re: DeepSeek Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-29 23:13 +0000
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 18:24 -0600
Re: DeepSeek Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-30 07:50 +0100
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 18:21 -0600
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 18:29 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-29 19:41 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 01:24 -0600
Re: DeepSeek x <x@x.org> - 2025-01-28 00:37 -0800
Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 00:49 -0800
Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 00:51 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:25 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 11:12 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:24 -0800
Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 18:51 -0800
Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 22:02 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:29 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:44 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:51 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-31 12:44 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 22:13 -0600
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 22:34 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-31 20:48 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-31 20:51 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 10:33 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-02 21:11 -0800
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-04 11:06 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 15:02 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-05 19:55 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 17:46 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-06 18:25 -0800
Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 22:00 -0600
Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-07 10:02 -0800
Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 12:27 -0800
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-31 20:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <679DA845.71A8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #891014 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Physfitfreak wrote: > > > > On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > >> > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> > > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>> I just started testing deepseek... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> and it passed with flying colors! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol. > > >>>> > > >>>> That is the goal! > > >>>> > > >>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly > > >>>> language, or any other language for that matter. > > >>>> > > >>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need > > >>>> to do is give it something...readable. > > >>>> > > >>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" > > >>> > > >>> You can go to > > >>> https://crackmes.one/ > > >>> to improve your reverse engineering skills. > > >>> > > >>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. > > >>> > > >>> Let Deepseek do all the work. > > >>> > > >>> give it something...readable. > > >>> > > >>> Any questions? > > >> > > >> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. > > > > > > > > > Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is > > because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek. > > > > I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about > > how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek. > > It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in > their own warez already... > > you might find it on github or hugginface... > > It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. > also Facebook gots it's claws in it... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-01 10:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vnlict$qatt$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #891014 |
On 1/31/25 10:48 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Physfitfreak wrote: >> >> On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> I just started testing deepseek... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and it passed with flying colors! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is the goal! >>>>>> >>>>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly >>>>>> language, or any other language for that matter. >>>>>> >>>>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need >>>>>> to do is give it something...readable. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" >>>>> >>>>> You can go to >>>>> https://crackmes.one/ >>>>> to improve your reverse engineering skills. >>>>> >>>>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. >>>>> >>>>> Let Deepseek do all the work. >>>>> >>>>> give it something...readable. >>>>> >>>>> Any questions? >>>> >>>> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. >>> >>> >>> Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is >> because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek. >> >> I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about >> how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek. > > It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in > their own warez already... > > you might find it on github or hugginface... > > > It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. > > > > > > I understand its API are public but the chat feature (or "assistant" - the DeepSeek v3 and DeepSeek R1) are maintained by the Chinese. DeepSeek can have different lives of its own depending on who is developing AI using its API. Google (and Apple) are concerned about its assistant only because they don't know how it is maintained and provided online and, as of now, still available on Google Play. A nice thing about DeepSeek assistant is that it also has a button to access DeepThink (R1) which explains in detail how it arrived at the information that it provided you. This feature, for those who are seeking solution to math or physics problems is wonderful. By the way, Qwen, as of this morning, gives: "500: Internal Error" when you try to access it. It may have been blocked by Capones in the USA.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-02 21:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67A04FE6.18C7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #891014 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Physfitfreak wrote: > > > > On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > >> > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> > > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>> I just started testing deepseek... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> and it passed with flying colors! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol. > > >>>> > > >>>> That is the goal! > > >>>> > > >>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly > > >>>> language, or any other language for that matter. > > >>>> > > >>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need > > >>>> to do is give it something...readable. > > >>>> > > >>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" > > >>> > > >>> You can go to > > >>> https://crackmes.one/ > > >>> to improve your reverse engineering skills. > > >>> > > >>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. > > >>> > > >>> Let Deepseek do all the work. > > >>> > > >>> give it something...readable. > > >>> > > >>> Any questions? > > >> > > >> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. > > > > > > > > > Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is > > because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek. > > > > I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about > > how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek. > > It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in > their own warez already... > > you might find it on github or hugginface... > > It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt version of openai... I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows! Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-04 11:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67A2651C.64DD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #891078 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Physfitfreak wrote: > > > > > > On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > >> > > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>> I just started testing deepseek... > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> and it passed with flying colors! > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results... > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> That is the goal! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly > > > >>>> language, or any other language for that matter. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need > > > >>>> to do is give it something...readable. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" > > > >>> > > > >>> You can go to > > > >>> https://crackmes.one/ > > > >>> to improve your reverse engineering skills. > > > >>> > > > >>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. > > > >>> > > > >>> Let Deepseek do all the work. > > > >>> > > > >>> give it something...readable. > > > >>> > > > >>> Any questions? > > > >> > > > >> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. > > > > > > > > > > > > Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is > > > because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek. > > > > > > I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about > > > how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek. > > > > It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in > > their own warez already... > > > > you might find it on github or hugginface... > > > > It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. > > Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt > version of openai... > > I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows! > > Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley.. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free. i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer cares...it guess he wants it to be free. Free Mrs. Fields cookies. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-04 15:02 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vntv8n$v7ev$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #891109 |
On 2/4/25 1:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon > and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free. > > i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer > cares...it guess he wants it to be free. > > Free Mrs. Fields cookies. That's cause he wants you to read it without him paying you for it. I want money to read his stuff. Any billionaire's stuff. Good money too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-05 19:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67A432B9.3742@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #891109 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Physfitfreak wrote: > > > > > > > > On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > >>>>>> I just started testing deepseek... > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> and it passed with flying colors! > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results... > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> That is the goal! > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly > > > > >>>> language, or any other language for that matter. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need > > > > >>>> to do is give it something...readable. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" > > > > >>> > > > > >>> You can go to > > > > >>> https://crackmes.one/ > > > > >>> to improve your reverse engineering skills. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Let Deepseek do all the work. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> give it something...readable. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Any questions? > > > > >> > > > > >> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is > > > > because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek. > > > > > > > > I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about > > > > how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek. > > > > > > It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in > > > their own warez already... > > > > > > you might find it on github or hugginface... > > > > > > It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. > > > > Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt > > version of openai... > > > > I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows! > > > > Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley.. > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc > > Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon > and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free. > > i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer > cares...it guess he wants it to be free. > > Free Mrs. Fields cookies. > Here is an excerpt from his book... Twenty-five years later, one journalist would call that evening at the Hyatt “the day someone stole Bill Gates’s software.” The hotel conference room was packed with a couple of hundred people, including many members of the Homebrew Club. While a MITS employee demonstrated the Altair, someone reached into a cardboard box and grabbed a spare paper tape of the 4K BASIC. I hardly have a memory of that evening, let alone whether I noticed the missing code—that would come a few months later. Eventually the tape found its way to a Homebrew member who churned out seventy more tape copies of software, handed them out at a Homebrew meeting, and encouraged everyone to make more copies. Within weeks, dozens, maybe hundreds, of copies of 4K BASIC were floating around—weeks before we were done with a version we had planned to sell. In line with the hippie ethos of the nascent personal computer world, it was generally accepted that software should be free. Software was something to be copied from a friend, openly shared, or even stolen. In many ways it was like music back then. For all the Bruce Springsteen fans who would buy Born to Run that summer, many others borrowed the album from a friend and recorded it on a cassette for free. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 17:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vo3hk5$117iq$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #891205 |
On 2/5/25 9:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> Physfitfreak wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I just started testing deepseek... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and it passed with flying colors! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That is the goal! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly >>>>>>>>> language, or any other language for that matter. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need >>>>>>>>> to do is give it something...readable. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can go to >>>>>>>> https://crackmes.one/ >>>>>>>> to improve your reverse engineering skills. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let Deepseek do all the work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> give it something...readable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any questions? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is >>>>> because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek. >>>>> >>>>> I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about >>>>> how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek. >>>> >>>> It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in >>>> their own warez already... >>>> >>>> you might find it on github or hugginface... >>>> >>>> It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. >>> >>> Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt >>> version of openai... >>> >>> I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows! >>> >>> Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley.. >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc >> >> Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon >> and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free. >> >> i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer >> cares...it guess he wants it to be free. >> >> Free Mrs. Fields cookies. >> > > > Here is an excerpt from his book... > > Twenty-five years later, one journalist would call that evening at the > Hyatt “the day someone stole Bill Gates’s software.” The hotel > conference room was packed with a couple of hundred people, including > many members of the Homebrew Club. While a MITS employee demonstrated > the Altair, someone reached into a cardboard box and grabbed a spare > paper tape of the 4K BASIC. I hardly have a memory of that evening, let > alone whether I noticed the > missing code—that would come a few months later. Eventually the tape > found its way to a Homebrew member who churned out seventy more tape > copies of software, handed them out at a Homebrew meeting, and > encouraged everyone to make more copies. Within weeks, dozens, maybe > hundreds, of copies of 4K BASIC were floating around—weeks before we > were done with a version we had planned to sell. > In line with the hippie ethos of the nascent personal computer world, it > was generally accepted that software should be free. Software was > something to be copied from a friend, openly shared, or even stolen. In > many ways it was like music back then. For all the Bruce Springsteen > fans who would buy Born to Run that summer, many others borrowed the > album from a friend and recorded it on a cassette for free. > > > > > Gates stole other people's works also, including from inside their buildings' dumpsters! He pulled out manuals from those trash that the company he was working for at the time had forbidden him to see. He'd go that far to steal your property..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 18:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67A56F24.1610@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #891230 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 2/5/25 9:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Physfitfreak wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> I just started testing deepseek... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> and it passed with flying colors! > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> That is the goal! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly > >>>>>>>>> language, or any other language for that matter. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need > >>>>>>>>> to do is give it something...readable. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You can go to > >>>>>>>> https://crackmes.one/ > >>>>>>>> to improve your reverse engineering skills. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Let Deepseek do all the work. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> give it something...readable. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Any questions? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is > >>>>> because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek. > >>>>> > >>>>> I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about > >>>>> how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek. > >>>> > >>>> It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in > >>>> their own warez already... > >>>> > >>>> you might find it on github or hugginface... > >>>> > >>>> It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. > >>> > >>> Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt > >>> version of openai... > >>> > >>> I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows! > >>> > >>> Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley.. > >>> > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc > >> > >> Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon > >> and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free. > >> > >> i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer > >> cares...it guess he wants it to be free. > >> > >> Free Mrs. Fields cookies. > >> > > > > > > Here is an excerpt from his book... > > > > Twenty-five years later, one journalist would call that evening at the > > Hyatt “the day someone stole Bill Gates’s software.†The hotel > > conference room was packed with a couple of hundred people, including > > many members of the Homebrew Club. While a MITS employee demonstrated > > the Altair, someone reached into a cardboard box and grabbed a spare > > paper tape of the 4K BASIC. I hardly have a memory of that evening, let > > alone whether I noticed the > > missing code—that would come a few months later. Eventually the tape > > found its way to a Homebrew member who churned out seventy more tape > > copies of software, handed them out at a Homebrew meeting, and > > encouraged everyone to make more copies. Within weeks, dozens, maybe > > hundreds, of copies of 4K BASIC were floating around—weeks before we > > were done with a version we had planned to sell. > > In line with the hippie ethos of the nascent personal computer world, it > > was generally accepted that software should be free. Software was > > something to be copied from a friend, openly shared, or even stolen. In > > many ways it was like music back then. For all the Bruce Springsteen > > fans who would buy Born to Run that summer, many others borrowed the > > album from a friend and recorded it on a cassette for free. > > > > > > > > > > > > Gates stole other people's works also, including from inside their > buildings' dumpsters! He pulled out manuals from those trash that the > company he was working for at the time had forbidden him to see. He'd go > that far to steal your property.. You're kida behind ain't you...you seem to be the last man on earth to know... https://youtu.be/ykyBWCC_SLg https://youtu.be/UFcb-XF1RPQ -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 22:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vo40gr$11f0q$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #891238 |
On 2/6/25 8:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Physfitfreak wrote: >> >> On 2/5/25 9:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Physfitfreak wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just started testing deepseek... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and it passed with flying colors! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That is the goal! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly >>>>>>>>>>> language, or any other language for that matter. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need >>>>>>>>>>> to do is give it something...readable. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can go to >>>>>>>>>> https://crackmes.one/ >>>>>>>>>> to improve your reverse engineering skills. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let Deepseek do all the work. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> give it something...readable. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any questions? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is >>>>>>> because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about >>>>>>> how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in >>>>>> their own warez already... >>>>>> >>>>>> you might find it on github or hugginface... >>>>>> >>>>>> It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. >>>>> >>>>> Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt >>>>> version of openai... >>>>> >>>>> I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows! >>>>> >>>>> Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley.. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc >>>> >>>> Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon >>>> and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free. >>>> >>>> i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer >>>> cares...it guess he wants it to be free. >>>> >>>> Free Mrs. Fields cookies. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Here is an excerpt from his book... >>> >>> Twenty-five years later, one journalist would call that evening at the >>> Hyatt “the day someone stole Bill Gates’s software.†The hotel >>> conference room was packed with a couple of hundred people, including >>> many members of the Homebrew Club. While a MITS employee demonstrated >>> the Altair, someone reached into a cardboard box and grabbed a spare >>> paper tape of the 4K BASIC. I hardly have a memory of that evening, let >>> alone whether I noticed the >>> missing code—that would come a few months later. Eventually the tape >>> found its way to a Homebrew member who churned out seventy more tape >>> copies of software, handed them out at a Homebrew meeting, and >>> encouraged everyone to make more copies. Within weeks, dozens, maybe >>> hundreds, of copies of 4K BASIC were floating around—weeks before we >>> were done with a version we had planned to sell. >>> In line with the hippie ethos of the nascent personal computer world, it >>> was generally accepted that software should be free. Software was >>> something to be copied from a friend, openly shared, or even stolen. In >>> many ways it was like music back then. For all the Bruce Springsteen >>> fans who would buy Born to Run that summer, many others borrowed the >>> album from a friend and recorded it on a cassette for free. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Gates stole other people's works also, including from inside their >> buildings' dumpsters! He pulled out manuals from those trash that the >> company he was working for at the time had forbidden him to see. He'd go >> that far to steal your property.. > > You're kida behind ain't you...you seem to be the last man on earth to > know... > > https://youtu.be/ykyBWCC_SLg > > https://youtu.be/UFcb-XF1RPQ > > > > > Hehe :) I saw that movie a long time ago. I have forgotten everything about it. Even now that I saw your two clips I didn't remember those scenes. But something I just noticed about the choice of actor for Gates. They had chosen the actor for Jobs character perfectly well, no question about that. But they had deliberately put an actor in the movie for Gate's character which had visually important differences from how Gates is or was. Gates is one of those, what do you call them... LANKY guys. The good old Qwen just helped me find the word. He is so lanky that he is of course embarrassed by it, and being Asperger never ever helps it either. His limbs are too long for his torso, way out of the normal proportions. And he has always been dressing just in the way to conceal that, and/or having cameras point at him from angles to keep it hidden. And in these clips you gave, I see the same efforts made to conceal it. They could damn well find an actor to show that feature in Gates as well, and they didn't do that! Jobs' choice was near perfect, but Gates' was obviously tampered with to order by someone other than the director. Gates himself! I know about that feature because Paul Allen, the other guy in the duo of Microsoft since middle school, has made fun of that feature in him a few times in his autobiography :) God knows how many times outside of that book! Hehe :) And of course only someone like Paul Allen could do that to Gates and get away with it. But his book came out I think around 2015 or a bit later. Long after that movie was made.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-07 10:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67A64ACB.50D4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #891243 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 2/6/25 8:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Physfitfreak wrote: > >> > >> On 2/5/25 9:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Physfitfreak wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just started testing deepseek... > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and it passed with flying colors! > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results... > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> That is the goal! > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly > >>>>>>>>>>> language, or any other language for that matter. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need > >>>>>>>>>>> to do is give it something...readable. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You can go to > >>>>>>>>>> https://crackmes.one/ > >>>>>>>>>> to improve your reverse engineering skills. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Let Deepseek do all the work. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> give it something...readable. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Any questions? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is > >>>>>>> because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about > >>>>>>> how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in > >>>>>> their own warez already... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> you might find it on github or hugginface... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. > >>>>> > >>>>> Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt > >>>>> version of openai... > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows! > >>>>> > >>>>> Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley.. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc > >>>> > >>>> Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon > >>>> and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free. > >>>> > >>>> i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer > >>>> cares...it guess he wants it to be free. > >>>> > >>>> Free Mrs. Fields cookies. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Here is an excerpt from his book... > >>> > >>> Twenty-five years later, one journalist would call that evening at the > >>> Hyatt “the day someone stole Bill Gates’s software.†The hotel > >>> conference room was packed with a couple of hundred people, including > >>> many members of the Homebrew Club. While a MITS employee demonstrated > >>> the Altair, someone reached into a cardboard box and grabbed a spare > >>> paper tape of the 4K BASIC. I hardly have a memory of that evening, let > >>> alone whether I noticed the > >>> missing codeâ€â€that would come a few months later. Eventually the tape > >>> found its way to a Homebrew member who churned out seventy more tape > >>> copies of software, handed them out at a Homebrew meeting, and > >>> encouraged everyone to make more copies. Within weeks, dozens, maybe > >>> hundreds, of copies of 4K BASIC were floating aroundâ€â€weeks before we > >>> were done with a version we had planned to sell. > >>> In line with the hippie ethos of the nascent personal computer world, it > >>> was generally accepted that software should be free. Software was > >>> something to be copied from a friend, openly shared, or even stolen. In > >>> many ways it was like music back then. For all the Bruce Springsteen > >>> fans who would buy Born to Run that summer, many others borrowed the > >>> album from a friend and recorded it on a cassette for free. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Gates stole other people's works also, including from inside their > >> buildings' dumpsters! He pulled out manuals from those trash that the > >> company he was working for at the time had forbidden him to see. He'd go > >> that far to steal your property.. > > > > You're kida behind ain't you...you seem to be the last man on earth to > > know... > > > > https://youtu.be/ykyBWCC_SLg > > > > https://youtu.be/UFcb-XF1RPQ > > > > > > > > > > > > Hehe :) I saw that movie a long time ago. I have forgotten everything > about it. Even now that I saw your two clips I didn't remember those > scenes. > > But something I just noticed about the choice of actor for Gates. > > They had chosen the actor for Jobs character perfectly well, no question > about that. But they had deliberately put an actor in the movie for > Gate's character which had visually important differences from how Gates > is or was. > > Gates is one of those, what do you call them... LANKY guys. The good old > Qwen just helped me find the word. He is so lanky that he is of course > embarrassed by it, and being Asperger never ever helps it either. His > limbs are too long for his torso, way out of the normal proportions. And > he has always been dressing just in the way to conceal that, and/or > having cameras point at him from angles to keep it hidden. > > And in these clips you gave, I see the same efforts made to conceal it. > They could damn well find an actor to show that feature in Gates as > well, and they didn't do that! Jobs' choice was near perfect, but Gates' > was obviously tampered with to order by someone other than the director. > Gates himself! > > I know about that feature because Paul Allen, the other guy in the duo > of Microsoft since middle school, has made fun of that feature in him a > few times in his autobiography :) God knows how many times outside of > that book! Hehe :) > > And of course only someone like Paul Allen could do that to Gates and > get away with it. But his book came out I think around 2015 or a bit > later. Long after that movie was made. You're hopless. title is 'pirates of silicone valley'. "pirates". Steve Jobs started out with Blue Boxex and hacking AT&T to get free phonecalls. Steve invented iPod, a music box tocarry pirated musics for everyone. These people are all criminals. they are bunch of hackers and crackers... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-01 12:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vnm03t$92b8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #890936 |
On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > I just started testing deepseek... > > and it passed with flying colors! > > > Next post will show you my test and results... > https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/blob/main/DeepSeek_V3.pdf
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web