Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #890844 > unrolled thread

Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 10:05 -0800
    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-23 12:34 -0600
    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 21:47 +0000
      Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:20 +0000
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-23 14:24 -0800
          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 21:40 +0000
          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 22:11 +0000
            Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 16:39 -0800
              Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:05 +0000
                Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 21:11 +0000
                  Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:15 +0000
                    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 21:23 +0000
                    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-01-27 11:13 +0100
                  Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-25 22:50 +0100
                    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 22:10 +0000
                      Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-25 23:25 +0100
                        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 22:30 +0000
                          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-26 07:47 +0100
                            Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-26 14:42 +0000
                              Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-26 21:02 +0100
                          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-26 14:34 +0000
                          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-26 23:46 -0600
                          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-02-01 23:28 +0100
                            Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-02 08:34 +0100
                              Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-02-02 11:39 +0100
                                Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-02 11:13 +0000
                                  Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-02-02 21:30 +0100
                                    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-03 02:38 +0000
                                Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-02 13:41 +0100
                  Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-25 14:56 -0800
                  Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-26 14:31 +0000
            Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 02:33 +0000
              Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 18:58 -0800
              Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:14 +0000
                Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 21:23 +0000
                  Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:39 +0000
                    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 21:47 +0000
                      Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-26 14:33 +0000
    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 21:44 +0000
      Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 21:35 -0800
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 05:45 +0000
          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 22:08 -0800
          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 22:47 -0800
            Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:12 -0600
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 21:30 +0000
    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:05 +0000
      Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:04 -0600
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-24 10:31 -0800
          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:53 -0600
            Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-24 12:43 -0800
              Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-26 15:16 -0600
                Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 11:02 -0800
                  Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 18:05 -0600
    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:26 +0000
    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:28 +0000
    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:40 +0000
      Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-23 15:06 -0800
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 23:37 +0000
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 23:45 +0000
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 00:21 +0000
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-24 03:19 +0000
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 04:14 +0000
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 04:26 +0000
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 04:25 +0000
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-24 07:21 +0100
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 21:44 +0000
          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-24 14:44 -0800
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 21:51 +0000
          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-24 14:46 -0800
            Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:03 +0000
            Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:22 +0000
    Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-24 09:06 +0100
      Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:14 -0600
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-25 07:53 +0100
      Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-24 10:29 -0800
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:55 -0600
        Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-25 07:54 +0100
          Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-25 09:44 -0800
            Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 13:04 -0600

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#890866

On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>>>> slavish, and avoidable.
>>>
>>>
>>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
>>> monopoly'.
>>>
>>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>>>
>>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>>>
>>>
>>> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>>>
>>>
>>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I'm on it!
>
>
> Now that you are  "on it", I just want to know who side you are on...
>
>
> How many planets are there in our solar system?
You know me. I wouldn't really take sides.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890867

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
> >>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
> >>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
> >>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
> >>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
> >>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
> >>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
> >>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
> >>>> slavish, and avoidable.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
> >>> monopoly'.
> >>>
> >>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
> >>>
> >>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I'm on it!
> >
> >
> > Now that you are  "on it", I just want to know who side you are on...
> >
> >
> > How many planets are there in our solar system?
> You know me. I wouldn't really take sides.

Is it 8 or 9?


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890869

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
> >>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
> >>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
> >>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
> >>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
> >>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
> >>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
> >>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
> >>>> slavish, and avoidable.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
> >>> monopoly'.
> >>>
> >>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
> >>>
> >>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I'm on it!
> >
> >
> > Now that you are  "on it", I just want to know who side you are on...
> >
> >
> > How many planets are there in our solar system?
> You know me. I wouldn't really take sides.

Not taking sides is in fact taking sides with the prevailing vote...8.


That is the number of how many planets You believe there in our solar
system.


You have uncritically and thoughtlessly embrace this idea without a
second thought that
there are 8 planets in out solor system. This is very pathetic, slavish,
and avoidable of you.

Shame on you, Clark.


 








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890876

On 1/24/25 12:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>>>>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>>>>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>>>>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>>>>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>>>>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>>>>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>>>>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>>>>>> slavish, and avoidable.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
>>>>> monopoly'.
>>>>>
>>>>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>>>>>
>>>>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'm on it!
>>>
>>>
>>> Now that you are  "on it", I just want to know who side you are on...
>>>
>>>
>>> How many planets are there in our solar system?
>> You know me. I wouldn't really take sides.
> 
> Not taking sides is in fact taking sides with the prevailing vote...8.
> 
> 
> That is the number of how many planets You believe there in our solar
> system.
> 
> 
> You have uncritically and thoughtlessly embrace this idea without a
> second thought that
> there are 8 planets in out solor system. This is very pathetic, slavish,
> and avoidable of you.
> 
> Shame on you, Clark.
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 





Could be that he's standing on his own pure stomach gas cause he doesn't 
believe Earth is a planet at all. Sun _does_ orbit around Earth, even 
within each 24 hour period. The evidence is right there to see!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890885

On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>>>> slavish, and avoidable.
>>>
>>>
>>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
>>> monopoly'.
>>>
>>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>>>
>>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>>>
>>>
>>> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>>>
>>>
>>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I'm on it!
>
>
> Now that you are  "on it", I just want to know who side you are on...
>
>
> How many planets are there in our solar system?
I would point out that the idea that universities prioritize teaching
what sells tuition over teaching good science is not a conspiracy
theory. It's just a profitable thing to do when people want to purchase
prestige instead of knowledge.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890849

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>> slavish, and avoidable.
>
>
> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
> monopoly'.
>
> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>
> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>
>
> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>
>
> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>
>
>
Of course, it is not a conspiracy theory to understand that universities
are prestige mills selling prestige for tuition. This is proven by the
fact that their marketing has persuaded people to pay fortunes to be
taught ignorant fallacies as sophisticated science. The idea that space
expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What
kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of
propounding conspiracy theory?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890875

On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> The idea that space
> expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What
> kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of
> propounding conspiracy theory?


Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the 
sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact. 
But it is not a place for mentally handicapped.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890879

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> > The idea that space
> > expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What
> > kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of
> > propounding conspiracy theory?
> 
> Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the
> sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact.
> But it is not a place for mentally handicapped.


How many freaks fit in fhysics???? 



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890880

On 1/24/25 12:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>> The idea that space
>>> expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What
>>> kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of
>>> propounding conspiracy theory?
>>
>> Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the
>> sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact.
>> But it is not a place for mentally handicapped.
> 
> 
> How many freaks fit in fhysics????
> 
> 
> 


There's only one freak in sci.physics. Me. I'm so much into physical 
fitness that I've become a freak about it.

You bozos who grab your little two pound dumbbells and "jog" for an 
exercise do not know shit about exercise.

Got out of your den and walk 10 miles this afternoon. That's a start.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890884

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> On 1/24/25 12:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Physfitfreak wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>> The idea that space
> >>> expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What
> >>> kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of
> >>> propounding conspiracy theory?
> >>
> >> Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the
> >> sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact.
> >> But it is not a place for mentally handicapped.
> >
> >
> > How many freaks fit in fhysics????
> >
> >
> >
> 
> There's only one freak in sci.physics. Me. I'm so much into physical
> fitness that I've become a freak about it.
> 
> You bozos who grab your little two pound dumbbells and "jog" for an
> exercise do not know shit about exercise.
> 
> Got out of your den and walk 10 miles this afternoon. That's a start.


Don't tell any girl you post in a Physics newsgroup...she gonna think
you talk Gym.


(and don't say dumbbell in front of her...)


she might stab you with a kitchen knife..


YOU FUCKING DUMBBELL WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING????





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890927

On 1/24/25 2:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 1/24/25 12:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>> The idea that space
>>>>> expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What
>>>>> kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of
>>>>> propounding conspiracy theory?
>>>>
>>>> Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the
>>>> sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact.
>>>> But it is not a place for mentally handicapped.
>>>
>>>
>>> How many freaks fit in fhysics????
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> There's only one freak in sci.physics. Me. I'm so much into physical
>> fitness that I've become a freak about it.
>>
>> You bozos who grab your little two pound dumbbells and "jog" for an
>> exercise do not know shit about exercise.
>>
>> Got out of your den and walk 10 miles this afternoon. That's a start.
> 
> 
> Don't tell any girl you post in a Physics newsgroup...she gonna think
> you talk Gym.
> 
> 
> (and don't say dumbbell in front of her...)
> 
> 
> she might stab you with a kitchen knife..
> 
> 
> YOU FUCKING DUMBBELL WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING????
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Why, is there another meaning to dumbbell? Don't cute women take their 
cute pink little dumbbells and jog outside to feel exercised?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890935

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> On 1/24/25 2:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Physfitfreak wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/24/25 12:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Physfitfreak wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>>>> The idea that space
> >>>>> expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What
> >>>>> kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of
> >>>>> propounding conspiracy theory?
> >>>>
> >>>> Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the
> >>>> sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact.
> >>>> But it is not a place for mentally handicapped.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How many freaks fit in fhysics????
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> There's only one freak in sci.physics. Me. I'm so much into physical
> >> fitness that I've become a freak about it.
> >>
> >> You bozos who grab your little two pound dumbbells and "jog" for an
> >> exercise do not know shit about exercise.
> >>
> >> Got out of your den and walk 10 miles this afternoon. That's a start.
> >
> >
> > Don't tell any girl you post in a Physics newsgroup...she gonna think
> > you talk Gym.
> >
> >
> > (and don't say dumbbell in front of her...)
> >
> >
> > she might stab you with a kitchen knife..
> >
> >
> > YOU FUCKING DUMBBELL WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING????
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Why, is there another meaning to dumbbell? Don't cute women take their
> cute pink little dumbbells and jog outside to feel exercised?

Tell those "cute pink little dumbbells" you see and say "You are suchs a
cute pink little dumbbell."


don't forget to duck...


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890944

On 1/27/25 1:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Tell those "cute pink little dumbbells" you see and say "You are suchs a
> cute pink little dumbbell."
> 
> 
> don't forget to duck...


DeepSeek says: the term dumbbell is outdated in modern slang.

So you must be old fart then. The Chinks think so anyway.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890852

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>> slavish, and avoidable.
>
>
> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
> monopoly'.
>
> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>
> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>
>
> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>
>
> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>
>
>
There is a double standard when claims of having proved parallel lines
do not meet are regarded as ridiculous, while implicitly assuming they
do is viewed as brilliant. This proves that some absurdly stupid ideas
have been marketed so slickly as to put them over on almost everybody to
the profit of universities and big science.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890853

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>> slavish, and avoidable.
>
>
> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
> monopoly'.
>
> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>
> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>
>
> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>
>
> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>
>
>
Would you like to step outside for a minute?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890854

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>> slavish, and avoidable.
>
>
> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
> monopoly'.
>
> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>
> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>
>
> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>
>
> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>
>
>
People are so scientifically ignorant that they can be taxed for vast
research grants on the pretext that space expands and is curved.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890855

In sci.physics LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>
>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>>> slavish, and avoidable.
>>
>>
>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
>> monopoly'.
>>
>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>>
>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>>
>>
>> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>>
>>
>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>>
>>
>>
> People are so scientifically ignorant that they can be taxed for vast
> research grants on the pretext that space expands and is curved.

Apparently, all the experiments and math are beyond your comprhension.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890856

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 23:06:50 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>>>> slavish, and avoidable.
>>>
>>>
>>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
>>> monopoly'.
>>>
>>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>>>
>>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>>>
>>>
>>> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>>>
>>>
>>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> People are so scientifically ignorant that they can be taxed for vast
>> research grants on the pretext that space expands and is curved.
>
> Apparently, all the experiments and math are beyond your comprehension.
You are lame on logic. Your derivation is wrong as already made clear in
this thread and in other recent threads. When the derivation is wrong it
cannot predict so your experiments cannot prove it. The derivation is
beyond your comprehension.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890857

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 23:06:50 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>>>> slavish, and avoidable.
>>>
>>>
>>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
>>> monopoly'.
>>>
>>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>>>
>>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>>>
>>>
>>> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>>>
>>>
>>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> People are so scientifically ignorant that they can be taxed for vast
>> research grants on the pretext that space expands and is curved.
>
> Apparently, all the experiments and math are beyond your comprehension.
Do you think the experiments prove parallel lines meet? They would have
to for space to curve. Your logic is wrong. Your derivation is wrong. It
doesn't predict.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890858

test

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web