Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #889547 > unrolled thread

Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-10 08:20 -0700
    Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-10 08:25 -0700
      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-11 09:52 +0200
        Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 12:30 +0000
          Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-11 08:46 -0700
    Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-11 11:20 +0000
    Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-11 10:05 -0700
    Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 06:52 +0000
      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 09:47 +0200
        Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 09:27 +0000
          Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 13:45 +0200
      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Bertietaylor @novabbs.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 08:09 +0000
        Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 09:27 +0000
          Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 11:38 +0000
            Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 11:59 +0000
              Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 20:43 +0000
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 21:35 +0000
                  Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 00:35 +0000
                    Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-12 17:58 -0700
                      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 01:25 +0000
                        Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-12 19:34 -0700
                          Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 08:20 +0200
                          Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 07:07 +0000
                            Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-10-13 23:13 -0500
                              Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-14 09:11 +0000
                                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-14 05:59 -0700
                                  Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-14 20:10 +0000
                                    Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-14 13:41 -0700
                                      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-14 23:58 +0000
                                        Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-14 18:12 -0700
                                          Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-15 02:21 +0000
                                            Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-15 07:08 -0700
                                              Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-16 06:50 +0000
                                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-10-15 01:27 -0500
                                  Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-15 08:22 +0000
                      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 08:20 +0200
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-12 22:41 -0700
                  Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-13 14:15 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#889601

In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 0:58:45 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 21:35:02 +0000, kazu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>> So facts are that EVs are flammable and rockets pollute the upper
>>>>> atmosphere causing greenhouse effects. And Musk is behind both these
>>>>> pollutions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> another fact is that electricity generation, maintaining the
>>>> global supply chain, all products and services you utilize, add ghgs.
>>>
>>> What's ghgs?
>>
>> A concept post 1890, i.e. a time about 200 years after the time all your
>> science education ends, Arindam.
> 
> Your science education never began, Penisnino.

Still penis obsessed, I see, but be that as it may, tell us again how
you were cheated out of your degree and forced from your jobs leaving
you with nothing to do other than to post delusional crackpot babble,
Arindam.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889604

W dniu 13.10.2024 o 04:34, Jim Pennino pisze:
> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 0:58:45 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 21:35:02 +0000, kazu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>>> So facts are that EVs are flammable and rockets pollute the upper
>>>>>> atmosphere causing greenhouse effects. And Musk is behind both these
>>>>>> pollutions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> another fact is that electricity generation, maintaining the
>>>>> global supply chain, all products and services you utilize, add ghgs.
>>>>
>>>> What's ghgs?
>>>
>>> A concept post 1890, i.e. a time about 200 years after the time all your
>>> science education ends, Arindam.
>>
>> Your science education never began, Penisnino.
> 
> Still penis obsessed, I see, but be that as it may, tell us again how
> you were cheated out of your degree and forced from your jobs leaving
> you with nothing to do other than to post delusional crackpot babble,
> Arindam.
> 
> 

- It's not just me and my idiot guru saying!
It's MUONS!!! And EXPERIMENTS!!!  And  the
overwhelming majority saying!!!!!

- but experiments can't speak and the
overwhelming majority is not even aware
of your idiocies...

- UUUU!!!  UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!!!
PLONK!!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889606

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 2:34:44 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 0:58:45 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 21:35:02 +0000, kazu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>>> So facts are that EVs are flammable and rockets pollute the upper
>>>>>> atmosphere causing greenhouse effects. And Musk is behind both these
>>>>>> pollutions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> another fact is that electricity generation, maintaining the
>>>>> global supply chain, all products and services you utilize, add ghgs.
>>>>
>>>> What's ghgs?
>>>
>>> A concept post 1890, i.e. a time about 200 years after the time all your
>>> science education ends, Arindam.
>>
>> Your science education never began, Penisnino.
>
> Still penis obsessed, I see, but be that as it may, tell us again how
> you were cheated out of your degree and forced from your jobs leaving
> you with nothing to do other than to post delusional crackpot babble,
> Arindam.

Glad not to have direct contact with negative types like you, Penisnino,
is the happy state of Arindam.

He is sufficiently well off, after 30 years of profitable employment, to
not need any assistance from the empowered frauds. So funds his own
works at his leisure. While enjoying life considerably.

Still, stick around. Dull as you are, you do respond and that is
something.

True Arindam was cheated of his PhD degree but that is nothing as
compared to what many others suffered at the hands of the unspeakables.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889616

On 10/13/24 02:07, Bertietaylor wrote:
> True Arindam was cheated of his PhD degree but that is nothing as
> compared to what many others suffered at the hands of the unspeakables.


I don't think you have finished high school.

By the way, why so many Indians are dying very young by heart attacks? 
Was it always like that until communication got much better?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889618

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 4:13:31 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 10/13/24 02:07, Bertietaylor wrote:
>> True Arindam was cheated of his PhD degree but that is nothing as
>> compared to what many others suffered at the hands of the unspeakables.
>
>
> I don't think you have finished high school.

We doggies go to dog school.
We are faithful unlike you stupid treacherous apes.
The higher the education of apes greater their stupidity and treachery.

>
> By the way, why so many Indians are dying very young by heart attacks?

Who told you that?
Check out life expectancy in India.

> Was it always like that until communication got much better?

Why are you interested?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889620

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 4:13:31 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>> On 10/13/24 02:07, Bertietaylor wrote:
>>> True Arindam was cheated of his PhD degree but that is nothing as
>>> compared to what many others suffered at the hands of the unspeakables.
>>
>>
>> I don't think you have finished high school.
> 
> We doggies go to dog school.
> We are faithful unlike you stupid treacherous apes.
> The higher the education of apes greater their stupidity and treachery.
> 
>>
>> By the way, why so many Indians are dying very young by heart attacks?
> 
> Who told you that?
> Check out life expectancy in India.

OK, for 2024 by country, years and rank from the world factbook:

Monaco 89.8 1
Canada 84.2 5
United Kingdom 82.2 33
United States 80.9 49
Sri Lanka 76.8 100
Pakistan 70.3 178
India 68.2 190

From https://www.policyx.com/health-insurance/articles/top-10-deadliest-disease-in-india/

"In 2022, it was estimated that around 60% of all deaths in India were
due to cardiovascular diseases."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889624

What has that desperately negative stuff about India to do with the
supreme Australian genius, Mr Arindam Banerjee!?

Woof-eoof

What fools these apes be!

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889625

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> What has that desperately negative stuff about India to do with the
> supreme Australian genius, Mr Arindam Banerjee!?

You asked for the India stats and I provided them. What's your
point crackpot?

> Bertietaylor (Arindam's other personality)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889631

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:41:52 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> What has that desperately negative stuff about India to do with the
>> supreme Australian genius, Mr Arindam Banerjee!?
>
> You asked for the India stats and I provided them. What's your
> point crackpot?

I did not ask for anything, fool. I told you to go check. What crappy
stats you pull out reflects the bias and insecurities of your sort.
>
>> Bertietaylor (Arindam's other personality)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889633

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:41:52 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> What has that desperately negative stuff about India to do with the
>>> supreme Australian genius, Mr Arindam Banerjee!?
>>
>> You asked for the India stats and I provided them. What's your
>> point crackpot?
> 
> I did not ask for anything, fool. I told you to go check.

I did and it is not my fault the data is not what you believe it is,
crackpot.

> stats you pull out reflects the bias and insecurities of your sort.

You mean the real world, crackpot?

>>> Bertietaylor (Arindam's other personality)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889634

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 1:12:36 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:41:52 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> What has that desperately negative stuff about India to do with the
>>>> supreme Australian genius, Mr Arindam Banerjee!?
>>>
>>> You asked for the India stats and I provided them. What's your
>>> point crackpot?
>>
>> I did not ask for anything, fool. I told you to go check.
>
> I did and it is not my fault the data is not what you believe it is,
> crackpot.

We never said we believed in any data, lying fool.
This newsgroup is about physics and not the conditions of Indians.
>
>> stats you pull out reflects the bias and insecurities of your sort.
>
> You mean the real world, crackpot?

The corrupted world, certainly. Why should professional liars and
shameless thieves, the empowered sort ruling the apes today, expect us
honest and faithful doggies to believe their crap is a matter of minor
interest.

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor
>
>>>> Bertietaylor (Arindam's other personality)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889643

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 1:12:36 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:41:52 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> What has that desperately negative stuff about India to do with the
>>>>> supreme Australian genius, Mr Arindam Banerjee!?
>>>>
>>>> You asked for the India stats and I provided them. What's your
>>>> point crackpot?
>>>
>>> I did not ask for anything, fool. I told you to go check.
>>
>> I did and it is not my fault the data is not what you believe it is,
>> crackpot.
> 
> We never said we believed in any data, lying fool.
> This newsgroup is about physics and not the conditions of Indians.

Then why did you bring it up, crackpot?

<snip crackpot babble>


Bertietaylor (Arindam's other personality)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889652

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:08:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 1:12:36 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:41:52 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> What has that desperately negative stuff about India to do with the
>>>>>> supreme Australian genius, Mr Arindam Banerjee!?
>>>>>
>>>>> You asked for the India stats and I provided them. What's your
>>>>> point crackpot?
>>>>
>>>> I did not ask for anything, fool. I told you to go check.
>>>
>>> I did and it is not my fault the data is not what you believe it is,
>>> crackpot.
>>
>> We never said we believed in any data, lying fool.
>> This newsgroup is about physics and not the conditions of Indians.
>
> Then why did you bring it up, crackpot?

I did not, liar.
Roachie did bring it up as he has no clue about physics so babbles about
various political and other irrelevant stuff; and you chimed in with
intent to demean while I effectively told you to get lost.


>
> <snip crackpot babble>
>
>
> Bertietaylor (Arindam's other personality)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889636

On 10/14/24 04:11, Bertietaylor wrote:
> 
> Why are you interested?


Who said I'm interested? My dick is interested.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889638

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 6:27:34 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 10/14/24 04:11, Bertietaylor wrote:
>>
>> Why are you interested?
>
>
> Who said I'm interested? My dick is interested.

Loan a part of it to he who needs it, that is, to Jimpee P*.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889603

W dniu 13.10.2024 o 02:58, Jim Pennino pisze:
> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 21:35:02 +0000, kazu wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor wrote:
>>>> So facts are that EVs are flammable and rockets pollute the upper
>>>> atmosphere causing greenhouse effects. And Musk is behind both these
>>>> pollutions.
>>>
>>>
>>> another fact is that electricity generation, maintaining the
>>> global supply chain, all products and services you utilize, add ghgs.
>>
>> What's ghgs?
> 
> A concept post 1890, i.e. a time about 200 years after the time all your
> science education ends, Arindam.
> 
> 

- It's not just me and my idiot guru saying!
It's MUONS!!! And EXPERIMENTS!!!  And  the
overwhelming majority saying!!!!!

- but experiments can't speak and the
overwhelming majority is not even aware
of your idiocies...

- UUUU!!!  UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!!!
PLONK!!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889602

Bertietaylor wrote:
> 
> So facts are that EVs are flammable and rockets pollute the upper
> atmosphere causing greenhouse effects. And Musk is behind both these
> pollutions.

are you tryin to say 
Musk
that is just a 
chemical, a
collection of molecues
on the surface of the earth

is the cause of...global warming????

is the cause of the 
magentic north pole movement away
from the north pole?

Musk is making bees fly west?


Is Stevie Wonder your physics teacher?


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889614

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Bertietaylor wrote:
> >
> > So facts are that EVs are flammable and rockets pollute the upper
> > atmosphere causing greenhouse effects. And Musk is behind both these
> > pollutions.
> 
> are you tryin to say
> Musk
> that is just a
> chemical, a
> collection of molecues
> on the surface of the earth
> 
> is the cause of...global warming????
> 
> is the cause of the
> magentic north pole movement away
> from the north pole?
> 
> Musk is making bees fly west?
> 




How about...atomic bombs? Does dat make holes on the upper
atmosphere causing greenhouse effects?

(nevermind wat it does to people...kill those chinks)




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web