Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #888073 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-06-13 21:20 -0700 |
| Last post | 2024-10-06 23:38 -0600 |
| Articles | 14 on this page of 94 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-13 21:20 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-13 22:46 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Burlie Koulaxizis Yee <bo@irlrka.gr> - 2024-06-15 10:24 +0000
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-15 13:39 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-16 15:03 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-16 22:07 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-16 16:07 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-16 22:12 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-16 22:37 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-17 13:17 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-25 10:08 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-25 10:24 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-25 10:40 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-26 10:31 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-26 11:00 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-02 08:43 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-25 11:34 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Chip Roy <X@Y.com> - 2024-06-25 17:36 +0000
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-29 08:19 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-29 08:40 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-29 09:06 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-29 09:49 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-29 12:01 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-29 12:08 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Gravy <X@Y.com> - 2024-08-29 20:54 +0000
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-29 21:54 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-30 21:26 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-30 22:09 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-30 22:22 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-31 10:26 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-08-31 15:34 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-08-31 17:51 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-09-03 19:46 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-31 16:28 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Gary <X@Y.com> - 2024-09-01 14:45 +0000
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-01 10:36 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-01 23:34 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-02 09:24 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-03 12:16 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-04 10:56 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-05 10:00 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-08 23:15 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-08 23:19 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-19 23:27 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-10-20 12:18 -0500
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-22 10:52 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-22 12:39 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-23 07:55 +0200
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-23 00:22 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-24 10:21 +0200
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-10-24 07:42 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-10-25 22:55 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-10-23 05:29 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-23 08:15 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-10-23 11:11 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-10-23 22:48 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-23 20:47 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-10-25 22:57 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-10-24 23:08 -0500
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-25 08:45 +0200
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2024-10-25 04:34 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-10-25 07:25 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-26 11:26 +0200
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-26 07:26 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-26 18:30 +0200
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-10-26 20:39 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-26 20:57 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-10-27 15:34 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-27 13:01 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-10-26 20:41 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-26 21:00 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-10-27 15:36 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-27 13:02 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-23 00:29 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-23 12:41 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-25 09:29 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-26 00:41 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-11-01 22:47 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-11-01 22:55 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-11-02 01:16 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-11-10 21:57 -0800
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-11-15 08:42 -0800
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-10-24 23:02 -0500
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-10-25 22:58 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-29 09:06 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-29 11:59 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-09-29 22:36 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-29 22:33 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-06 23:39 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-10-07 02:24 -0400
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-29 23:05 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-06 23:40 -0600
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-04 08:33 -0700
Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-10-06 23:38 -0600
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-10 21:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67319CB2.4514@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #889927 |
What do you suppose the Democrats in the Biden Adminstration are up to now???? I keep seeing now in the news... IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! and then...POW! and the democrats will say... "I told you so!" when all it is is a setup... 'election interference'. Are 'they' betting he won't make it to..Inauguration???? IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! no, the democrats want to kill trump. and of course point the finger at iran. iran is the fall guy. Are 'they' betting he won't make it to..Inauguration???? Let's see how many times they will continue with... IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! in the news headlines. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-15 08:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67377A06.679A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #890031 |
In today's WSJ the Headline reads: EXCLUSIVE MIDDLE EAST Iran Told U.S. It Wouldn’t Try to Kill Trump https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/iran-told-u-s-it-wasnt-trying-to-kill-trump-c2d8267d?mod=hp_lead_pos6 In other words, Iran is saying..."WE ARE NOT TRYING TO KILL TRUMP. IT'S YOU FUCKING GUYS WHO ARE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP!!!!" Nancy Pelosi is probably buying ak-47's from iran... Why don't Iran simply say..."IT'S NANCY PELOSI AND CHUCK SHULMER AND THE FUCKING CIA WHO ARE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP!!!" Tell Iran give us some names... Robert DeNiro? Whoopi Goldberg?? I tell you, put all these democrats in concentration camps...I'll handle the food problem. "Let them eat grass" The Starmaker wrote: > > What do you suppose the Democrats in the Biden Adminstration are up to > now???? > > I keep seeing now in the news... > > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > > and then...POW! and the democrats will say... > > "I told you so!" > > when all it is is a setup... > > 'election interference'. > > Are 'they' betting he won't make it to..Inauguration???? > > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > > no, the democrats want to kill trump. > > and of course > point the finger > at iran. > > iran is the fall guy. > > Are 'they' betting he won't make it to..Inauguration???? > > Let's see how many times they will continue with... > > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!! > > in the news headlines. > > > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-24 23:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vff58r$1bvkt$6@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #889727 |
On 10/22/24 12:52, The Starmaker wrote: > Physfitfreak wrote: >> >> On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote: >>> https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148 >>> >>> >>> >> >> She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick. >> >> Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon. > > what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the > votting machines, and > that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in > Government, but 'the people' themselves. > > https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148 > > > That means after the election...there will be war. > > > WAR! > > blood in the streets > > > When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT! > > He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight. > > > All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see > anybody taking them out. > > > so the beat goes on... > > > > > > People in this country cannot do shit. Things are done here by billionaires. If you see government is doing something, it is doing billionaires' work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-25 22:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fmmohjlf3qlbtfid2ouut1ad72j97ghble@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #889756 |
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:02:35 -0500, Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote: >If you see government is doing something, it is doing >billionaires' work. +1 -- Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 11 days. 59) Trump repeatedly suggested he might serve more than two terms in violation of the Constitution. And continues to do so! (Trump: "We may have to go for an extra term." 60) Trump called Haiti and African nations "sh*thole countries."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-29 09:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66D09C79.779B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #889204 |
'heads i win, tails you lose' when i was a kid i always carried a two-headed quarter. cheating is sooo much fun.. you go through life always winning! i don't play strip poker with girls without a marked deck... The Starmaker wrote: > > Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes." > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he > > could have easily won ' > > > > 'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win' > > > > But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting > > Machines rigs the count. > > > > Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do > > about it?" > > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large > > > > The more things change, the more they remain the same. > > > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > >So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to > > >assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November???? > > > > > > > > >I don't see any other 'option' that they have. > > > > > > > > >I don't see any at all. > > > > > >do you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker > > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > >>By now you people should be able to SMELL > > >>that the next plan from the democracts is to... > > >>*cancel* the election"???? > > >> > > >> > > >>Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts > > >>are now planning to cancel the upcoming > > >>2024 election... > > >> > > >>i think he is having fun. > > >> > > >> > > >>What kind of Americans are you? > > >> > > >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Nancy Pelosi has her own plans... > > >>she's on the sixth floor > > >>Texas Library. > > >> > > >>and her daughter is on the phone... > > >>"I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!" > > >> > > >> > > >>Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election? > > >> > > >> > > >>I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>(i don't think nancy can shoot straight) > > >> > > >>HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>election-rigging at it's best! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I mean, don't you people think that if > > >>> Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up > > >>> that the next plan from the democracts is to... > > >>> *cancel* the election"???? > > >>> > > >>> Are you people not prepared for this?? > > >>> > > >>> That's the plan. > > >>> > > >>> The plan is to *cancel* the election. > > >>> > > >>> In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election. > > >>> > > >>> for "technical reasons"... > > >>> > > >>> one can come up with > > >>> thousands of reasons.. > > >>> like fabricate that all the > > >>> voting machines have been tampered with, etc. > > >>> > > >>> election delayed is election denied. > > >>> > > >>> BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled! > > >>> > > >>> It's called...'election manipulation'.... > > >>> interfering with the election process. > > >>> > > >>> or > > >>> > > >>> "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker > > >>> > > >>> throwing your > > >>> oppenents > > >>> out the window is > > >>> 'election manipulation'. > > >>> > > >>> It is a..coup d'etat. > > >>> > > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024 > > >>> > > > >>> > Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and > > >>> > any other hurdles...'they' can always.. > > >>> > > > >>> > delay the election day for "technical reasons".. > > >>> > > > >>> > election delayed is election denied. > > >>> > > > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!" > > >>> > > > >>> > Trump: "You cannot call off the election!" > > >>> > > > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" > > >>> > > > >>> > The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024 > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it > > >>> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html > > >>> > > > > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0 > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Paul Kagame is the MAN! > > >>> > > > > >>> > > (read about his opponents) > > >>> > > > > >>> > > How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!! > > >>> > > > > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html > > >>> > > > > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0 > > >>> > > > > >>> > > He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of > > >>> > > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too! > > >>> > > > > >>> > > one million of them in 90 days! > > >>> > > > > >>> > > dats how you get 99% Of The Vote. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > he no need no stinky usb stick. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for? > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for? > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > I haven't seen the polls mentioned them. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means > > >>> > > > the same dead people who voted in the last election will > > >>> > > > be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate? > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Do dead people vote by mail or do they > > >>> > > > stuffing ballot boxes at night? > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people > > >>> > > > there are... > > >>> > > > 1.8 million. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > How To Rig an Election, Again! > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of > > >>> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics > > >>> > > > may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting > > >>> > > > polling place accessibility. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts > > >>> > > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a > > >>> > > > disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the > > >>> > > > principle of equal representation. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters > > >>> > > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious > > >>> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical > > >>> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular > > >>> > > > candidate or party. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to > > >>> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased > > >>> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to > > >>> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting > > >>> > > > based on informed choice. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that > > >>> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors > > >>> > > > in voting. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting > > >>> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation > > >>> > > > online to influence public opinion. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public > > >>> > > > funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or > > >>> > > > party. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of > > >>> > > > others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from > > >>> > > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the > > >>> > > > electorate. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of > > >>> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions, > > >>> > > > to gain an unfair advantage. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of > > >>> > > > independent election observers, both domestic and international, who > > >>> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key > > >>> > > > positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased > > >>> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems > > >>> > > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or > > >>> > > > campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or > > >>> > > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions > > >>> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along > > >>> > > > identity lines. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to > > >>> > > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as > > >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws > > >>> > > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and > > >>> > > > engage in questionable practices. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information > > >>> > > > through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence > > >>> > > > public opinion and sway voters. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of > > >>> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate > > >>> > > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or > > >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on > > >>> > > > the legitimacy of the process. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, > > >>> > > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit > > >>> > > > fraudulent postal votes. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations > > >>> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating > > >>> > > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt > > >>> > > > to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, > > >>> > > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to > > >>> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing > > >>> > > > field. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or > > >>> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on > > >>> > > > questionable grounds. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition > > >>> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster > > >>> > > > a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the > > >>> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials > > >>> > > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the > > >>> > > > impartiality of the electoral process. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate > > >>> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker > > >>> > > > opponents. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete > > >>> > > > information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, > > >>> > > > issues, or the electoral process. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and > > >>> > > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting > > >>> > > > election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting > > >>> > > > systems. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or > > >>> > > > bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or > > >>> > > > manipulate online discussions. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues > > >>> > > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific > > >>> > > > demographics. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for > > >>> > > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout > > >>> > > > in favor of a particular candidate or party. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, > > >>> > > > debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one > > >>> > > > candidate or party. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle > > >>> > > > forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to > > >>> > > > discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public > > >>> > > > resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that > > >>> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of > > >>> > > > positive government news or policy announcements close to the election > > >>> > > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a > > >>> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform > > >>> > > > to the perceived majority opinion. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent > > >>> > > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence > > >>> > > > voter attitudes. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within > > >>> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their > > >>> > > > strategies. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the > > >>> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false > > >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a > > >>> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or > > >>> > > > gain a tactical advantage. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic > > >>> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially > > >>> > > > using financial markets as a tool. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific > > >>> > > > issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public > > >>> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > i almost forgot...a USB stick. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > -- > > >>> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > >>> > > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > >>> > > > >>> > -- > > >>> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > >>> and challenge the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-09-29 11:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4f7jfj943vk3nan4sgfv0qfmllvu1rrbu7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #889206 |
The Question of course is... what NUMBER will the Democrats decide to rig the Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machine???? by 51, or by 52 percent? No way 100%, or 90's 80's 70's 60's... (maybe some other country) it has to be in the low 50's. wadda you think? 59 sounds too high and unrealistic. 58 i don't think so I say, not over 52. and not under 51. "It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes." The software does the counting. But it is very important that real people vote in order for the 'switch' to be made. Get out your hardhats! https://news.google.com/search?q=cart%20hardhat%20ballot&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen there is an election coming... Zelenskyy is screaming "WHERE ARE ALL MY HITMEN????" didn't you hear, there is an election coming! Put all the ballot boxes in Black neighborhoods only, and cart off all the ballot boxes in White neighborhoods. I'm telling you..Democrats know all the tricks for How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 Learn Grasshopper. 52 sounds kind of high...what do you think? 51 sounds just right. Not too hot, not too cold..just right. Goldenlocks knows best. > > > >The Starmaker wrote: >> >> Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes." >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >> > >> > Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he >> > could have easily won ' >> > >> > 'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win' >> > >> > But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting >> > Machines rigs the count. >> > >> > Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do >> > about it?" >> > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large >> > >> > The more things change, the more they remain the same. >> > >> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker >> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> > >> > >So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to >> > >assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November???? >> > > >> > > >> > >I don't see any other 'option' that they have. >> > > >> > > >> > >I don't see any at all. >> > > >> > >do you? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker >> > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >>By now you people should be able to SMELL >> > >>that the next plan from the democracts is to... >> > >>*cancel* the election"???? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts >> > >>are now planning to cancel the upcoming >> > >>2024 election... >> > >> >> > >>i think he is having fun. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>What kind of Americans are you? >> > >> >> > >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>Nancy Pelosi has her own plans... >> > >>she's on the sixth floor >> > >>Texas Library. >> > >> >> > >>and her daughter is on the phone... >> > >>"I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!" >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!! >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>(i don't think nancy can shoot straight) >> > >> >> > >>HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!! >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>election-rigging at it's best! >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>The Starmaker wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> I mean, don't you people think that if >> > >>> Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up >> > >>> that the next plan from the democracts is to... >> > >>> *cancel* the election"???? >> > >>> >> > >>> Are you people not prepared for this?? >> > >>> >> > >>> That's the plan. >> > >>> >> > >>> The plan is to *cancel* the election. >> > >>> >> > >>> In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election. >> > >>> >> > >>> for "technical reasons"... >> > >>> >> > >>> one can come up with >> > >>> thousands of reasons.. >> > >>> like fabricate that all the >> > >>> voting machines have been tampered with, etc. >> > >>> >> > >>> election delayed is election denied. >> > >>> >> > >>> BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled! >> > >>> >> > >>> It's called...'election manipulation'.... >> > >>> interfering with the election process. >> > >>> >> > >>> or >> > >>> >> > >>> "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker >> > >>> >> > >>> throwing your >> > >>> oppenents >> > >>> out the window is >> > >>> 'election manipulation'. >> > >>> >> > >>> It is a..coup d'etat. >> > >>> >> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: >> > >>> > >> > >>> > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024 >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and >> > >>> > any other hurdles...'they' can always.. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > delay the election day for "technical reasons".. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > election delayed is election denied. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!" >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Trump: "You cannot call off the election!" >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" >> > >>> > >> > >>> > The Starmaker wrote: >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024 >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it >> > >>> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August. >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0 >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > Paul Kagame is the MAN! >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > (read about his opponents) >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!! >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0 >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of >> > >>> > > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too! >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > one million of them in 90 days! >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > dats how you get 99% Of The Vote. >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > he no need no stinky usb stick. >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > The Starmaker wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for? >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for? >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > I haven't seen the polls mentioned them. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means >> > >>> > > > the same dead people who voted in the last election will >> > >>> > > > be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate? >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Do dead people vote by mail or do they >> > >>> > > > stuffing ballot boxes at night? >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people >> > >>> > > > there are... >> > >>> > > > 1.8 million. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > How To Rig an Election, Again! >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >> > >>> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics >> > >>> > > > may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting >> > >>> > > > polling place accessibility. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts >> > >>> > > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >> > >>> > > > disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >> > >>> > > > principle of equal representation. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters >> > >>> > > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >> > >>> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >> > >>> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >> > >>> > > > candidate or party. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >> > >>> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >> > >>> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >> > >>> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting >> > >>> > > > based on informed choice. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >> > >>> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors >> > >>> > > > in voting. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >> > >>> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation >> > >>> > > > online to influence public opinion. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public >> > >>> > > > funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >> > >>> > > > party. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of >> > >>> > > > others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from >> > >>> > > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >> > >>> > > > electorate. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >> > >>> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions, >> > >>> > > > to gain an unfair advantage. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of >> > >>> > > > independent election observers, both domestic and international, who >> > >>> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key >> > >>> > > > positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >> > >>> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems >> > >>> > > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or >> > >>> > > > campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or >> > >>> > > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >> > >>> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >> > >>> > > > identity lines. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >> > >>> > > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >> > >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws >> > >>> > > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >> > >>> > > > engage in questionable practices. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information >> > >>> > > > through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence >> > >>> > > > public opinion and sway voters. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >> > >>> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate >> > >>> > > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >> > >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on >> > >>> > > > the legitimacy of the process. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, >> > >>> > > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >> > >>> > > > fraudulent postal votes. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >> > >>> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating >> > >>> > > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt >> > >>> > > > to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >> > >>> > > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >> > >>> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >> > >>> > > > field. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >> > >>> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >> > >>> > > > questionable grounds. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >> > >>> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster >> > >>> > > > a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >> > >>> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials >> > >>> > > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >> > >>> > > > impartiality of the electoral process. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >> > >>> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >> > >>> > > > opponents. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete >> > >>> > > > information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >> > >>> > > > issues, or the electoral process. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >> > >>> > > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting >> > >>> > > > election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >> > >>> > > > systems. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or >> > >>> > > > bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >> > >>> > > > manipulate online discussions. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues >> > >>> > > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific >> > >>> > > > demographics. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for >> > >>> > > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout >> > >>> > > > in favor of a particular candidate or party. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, >> > >>> > > > debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >> > >>> > > > candidate or party. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle >> > >>> > > > forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to >> > >>> > > > discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public >> > >>> > > > resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >> > >>> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of >> > >>> > > > positive government news or policy announcements close to the election >> > >>> > > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >> > >>> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform >> > >>> > > > to the perceived majority opinion. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent >> > >>> > > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence >> > >>> > > > voter attitudes. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >> > >>> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their >> > >>> > > > strategies. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >> > >>> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false >> > >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >> > >>> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or >> > >>> > > > gain a tactical advantage. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >> > >>> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially >> > >>> > > > using financial markets as a tool. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific >> > >>> > > > issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >> > >>> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > i almost forgot...a USB stick. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > -- >> > >>> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > >>> > > > and challenge the unchallengeable. >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > -- >> > >>> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > -- >> > >>> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable. >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > >>> and challenge the unchallengeable. >> >> -- >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-09-29 22:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vdd9sk$23ta9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #889393 |
The Starmaker wrote: > The Question of course is... > what NUMBER > will the Democrats decide to > rig the Dominion and Smartmatic > Voting Machine???? 1. bamboo ballots 2. magic thermostats 3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine 4. HUGO CHAVEZ 5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-09-29 22:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66FA3815.2400@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #889399 |
Gronk wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > The Question of course is... > > what NUMBER > > will the Democrats decide to > > rig the Dominion and Smartmatic > > Voting Machine???? > > 1. bamboo ballots > > 2. magic thermostats > > 3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine > > 4. HUGO CHAVEZ > > 5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes you forgot 6. 6. Ukrainian hit squad. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-06 23:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vdvs65$1jsee$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #889402 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Gronk wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> The Question of course is... >>> what NUMBER >>> will the Democrats decide to >>> rig the Dominion and Smartmatic >>> Voting Machine???? >> >> 1. bamboo ballots >> >> 2. magic thermostats >> >> 3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine >> >> 4. HUGO CHAVEZ >> >> 5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes > > you forgot 6. > > 6. Ukrainian hit squad. 7. "Russia - if you're listening"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-07 02:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <t7v6gjlgp5ko1ut7c0j74ibds606i2acs6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #889519 |
On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 23:39:18 -0600, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: >The Starmaker wrote: >> Gronk wrote: >>> >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> The Question of course is... >>>> what NUMBER >>>> will the Democrats decide to >>>> rig the Dominion and Smartmatic >>>> Voting Machine???? >>> >>> 1. bamboo ballots >>> >>> 2. magic thermostats >>> >>> 3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine >>> >>> 4. HUGO CHAVEZ >>> >>> 5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes >> >> you forgot 6. >> >> 6. Ukrainian hit squad. > >7. "Russia - if you're listening" 8. Asking Ukraine to investigate the Biden's during an election. 9. "China should start an investigation into the Bidens" - also said during an election campaign Why don't Trump fans think that asking our adversaries to interfere in our elections is treason? -- Although Trump is not among Project 2025'- 34 authors, more than half are appointees and staff from his time as president; the words "Trump" and "Trump Administration" appear 300 times in its pages. At least 140 former Trump officials are involved in Project 2025, according to a CNN tally. It’s reasonable to expect that a second Trump presidency would follow many of the project’s recommendations. Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 31 days. 32) After losing, Trump falsely claimed the election was stolen, even though his own inner circle, including his campaign manager, White House lawyers, and his own Justice Department, and attorney general told him it was not. Barr: "The claims of fraud were bullsh*t." 33) Trump kept telling his Big Lie even after more than 60 legal challenges to the election were struck down in court, many by Trump-appointed judges.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-09-29 23:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66FA3F8E.69AD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #889399 |
Gronk wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > The Question of course is... > > what NUMBER > > will the Democrats decide to > > rig the Dominion and Smartmatic > > Voting Machine???? > > 1. bamboo ballots > > 2. magic thermostats > > 3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine > > 4. HUGO CHAVEZ > > 5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes Everybody knows Democrats can only count up to...5. (whether you use your right hand or your left hand or both, it counts only up to 5.) As you people probably already know... someone told Biden and Kamala Harris that half of the USA population has 'below average intelligence.' That's their audience they are trying to reach. That is why Kamal uses Baby Talk. BabyNonmics. In today's Wall Street Jorunal the Headline reads: "Harris needs to win over non-college-educated voters, ..." https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/nevada-election-swing-state-trump-harris-1cea51ed?mod=hp_lista_pos1 a person who does not have a degree from a university or college, or, in the U.S., a diploma from a high school : https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/non-graduate (people like Gronk who can only count up to 5) "Harris needs to win over non-college-educated voters, ..." a person who does not have a degree from a university or college, or, in the U.S., a diploma from a high school : In other words, 3rd grade reading level adults. Run Spot Run. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-06 23:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vdvs8a$1jsee$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #889403 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Gronk wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> The Question of course is... >>> what NUMBER >>> will the Democrats decide to >>> rig the Dominion and Smartmatic >>> Voting Machine???? >> >> 1. bamboo ballots >> >> 2. magic thermostats >> >> 3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine >> >> 4. HUGO CHAVEZ >> >> 5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes > > Everybody knows Democrats can only count up to...5. Everyone knows republicons can't count at all!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-04 08:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hi20gjpoaav8brd9hv40qls2rdt77rdpdh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #889393 |
Believe it or not... they are planning to Rig the voting machine to read number...57. On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 11:59:18 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Question of course is... >what NUMBER >will the Democrats decide to >rig the Dominion and Smartmatic >Voting Machine???? > >by 51, or by 52 percent? > > >No way 100%, or >90's >80's >70's >60's... > >(maybe some other country) > >it has to be in the low 50's. > >wadda you think? > >59 sounds too high and >unrealistic. > >58 i don't think so > > >I say, not over 52. and not under 51. > > > >"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes." > >The software does the counting. > > >But it is very important that real people >vote in order for the 'switch' to be made. > > > >Get out your hardhats! >https://news.google.com/search?q=cart%20hardhat%20ballot&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen > > > >there is an election coming... > > > >Zelenskyy is screaming "WHERE ARE ALL MY HITMEN????" > > > >didn't you hear, there is an election coming! > > >Put all the ballot boxes in Black neighborhoods only, and cart off >all the ballot boxes in White neighborhoods. > > >I'm telling you..Democrats know all the tricks for > > >How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024 > > > >Learn Grasshopper. > > > > 52 sounds kind of high...what do you think? > >51 sounds just right. > > >Not too hot, not too cold..just right. > > >Goldenlocks knows best. > > > > >> >> >> >>The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes." >>> >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>> > >>> > Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he >>> > could have easily won ' >>> > >>> > 'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win' >>> > >>> > But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting >>> > Machines rigs the count. >>> > >>> > Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do >>> > about it?" >>> > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large >>> > >>> > The more things change, the more they remain the same. >>> > >>> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker >>> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to >>> > >assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November???? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >I don't see any other 'option' that they have. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >I don't see any at all. >>> > > >>> > >do you? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker >>> > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >>By now you people should be able to SMELL >>> > >>that the next plan from the democracts is to... >>> > >>*cancel* the election"???? >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts >>> > >>are now planning to cancel the upcoming >>> > >>2024 election... >>> > >> >>> > >>i think he is having fun. >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>What kind of Americans are you? >>> > >> >>> > >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>Nancy Pelosi has her own plans... >>> > >>she's on the sixth floor >>> > >>Texas Library. >>> > >> >>> > >>and her daughter is on the phone... >>> > >>"I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!" >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election? >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!! >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>(i don't think nancy can shoot straight) >>> > >> >>> > >>HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!! >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>election-rigging at it's best! >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>The Starmaker wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> I mean, don't you people think that if >>> > >>> Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up >>> > >>> that the next plan from the democracts is to... >>> > >>> *cancel* the election"???? >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Are you people not prepared for this?? >>> > >>> >>> > >>> That's the plan. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> The plan is to *cancel* the election. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> for "technical reasons"... >>> > >>> >>> > >>> one can come up with >>> > >>> thousands of reasons.. >>> > >>> like fabricate that all the >>> > >>> voting machines have been tampered with, etc. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> election delayed is election denied. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled! >>> > >>> >>> > >>> It's called...'election manipulation'.... >>> > >>> interfering with the election process. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> or >>> > >>> >>> > >>> "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker >>> > >>> >>> > >>> throwing your >>> > >>> oppenents >>> > >>> out the window is >>> > >>> 'election manipulation'. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> It is a..coup d'etat. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and >>> > >>> > any other hurdles...'they' can always.. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > delay the election day for "technical reasons".. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > election delayed is election denied. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!" >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Trump: "You cannot call off the election!" >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > The Starmaker wrote: >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024 >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it >>> > >>> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August. >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0 >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame is the MAN! >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > (read about his opponents) >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!! >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0 >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of >>> > >>> > > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too! >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > one million of them in 90 days! >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > dats how you get 99% Of The Vote. >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > he no need no stinky usb stick. >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > The Starmaker wrote: >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for? >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for? >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > I haven't seen the polls mentioned them. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means >>> > >>> > > > the same dead people who voted in the last election will >>> > >>> > > > be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate? >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Do dead people vote by mail or do they >>> > >>> > > > stuffing ballot boxes at night? >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people >>> > >>> > > > there are... >>> > >>> > > > 1.8 million. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > How To Rig an Election, Again! >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >>> > >>> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics >>> > >>> > > > may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting >>> > >>> > > > polling place accessibility. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts >>> > >>> > > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >>> > >>> > > > disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >>> > >>> > > > principle of equal representation. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters >>> > >>> > > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >>> > >>> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>> > >>> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >>> > >>> > > > candidate or party. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >>> > >>> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>> > >>> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >>> > >>> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting >>> > >>> > > > based on informed choice. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >>> > >>> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors >>> > >>> > > > in voting. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >>> > >>> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation >>> > >>> > > > online to influence public opinion. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public >>> > >>> > > > funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >>> > >>> > > > party. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of >>> > >>> > > > others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from >>> > >>> > > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >>> > >>> > > > electorate. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >>> > >>> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions, >>> > >>> > > > to gain an unfair advantage. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of >>> > >>> > > > independent election observers, both domestic and international, who >>> > >>> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key >>> > >>> > > > positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>> > >>> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems >>> > >>> > > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or >>> > >>> > > > campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or >>> > >>> > > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >>> > >>> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >>> > >>> > > > identity lines. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >>> > >>> > > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>> > >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws >>> > >>> > > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >>> > >>> > > > engage in questionable practices. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information >>> > >>> > > > through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence >>> > >>> > > > public opinion and sway voters. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >>> > >>> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate >>> > >>> > > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>> > >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on >>> > >>> > > > the legitimacy of the process. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, >>> > >>> > > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >>> > >>> > > > fraudulent postal votes. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >>> > >>> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating >>> > >>> > > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt >>> > >>> > > > to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >>> > >>> > > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >>> > >>> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >>> > >>> > > > field. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>> > >>> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>> > >>> > > > questionable grounds. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >>> > >>> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster >>> > >>> > > > a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >>> > >>> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials >>> > >>> > > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >>> > >>> > > > impartiality of the electoral process. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>> > >>> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>> > >>> > > > opponents. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete >>> > >>> > > > information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >>> > >>> > > > issues, or the electoral process. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >>> > >>> > > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting >>> > >>> > > > election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >>> > >>> > > > systems. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or >>> > >>> > > > bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >>> > >>> > > > manipulate online discussions. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues >>> > >>> > > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific >>> > >>> > > > demographics. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for >>> > >>> > > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout >>> > >>> > > > in favor of a particular candidate or party. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, >>> > >>> > > > debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>> > >>> > > > candidate or party. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle >>> > >>> > > > forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to >>> > >>> > > > discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public >>> > >>> > > > resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >>> > >>> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of >>> > >>> > > > positive government news or policy announcements close to the election >>> > >>> > > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >>> > >>> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform >>> > >>> > > > to the perceived majority opinion. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent >>> > >>> > > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence >>> > >>> > > > voter attitudes. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >>> > >>> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their >>> > >>> > > > strategies. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>> > >>> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false >>> > >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >>> > >>> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or >>> > >>> > > > gain a tactical advantage. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >>> > >>> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially >>> > >>> > > > using financial markets as a tool. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific >>> > >>> > > > issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >>> > >>> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > i almost forgot...a USB stick. >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > -- >>> > >>> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > >>> > > > and challenge the unchallengeable. >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > -- >>> > >>> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> -- >>> > >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > >>> and challenge the unchallengeable. >>> >>> -- >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-06 23:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vdvs4n$1jsee$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #889491 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Believe it or not... > they are planning to Rig the voting machine > to read number...57. Quick! You must get to Gotham City and warn Commissioner Gordon!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web