Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #889193 > unrolled thread

Re: Sync two clocks

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Sync two clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-25 09:36 -0700
    Re: Sync two clocks Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-25 19:41 +0200
    Re: Sync two clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-26 09:41 -0700

#889193 — Re: Sync two clocks

Now, common sense would tell you
that it is not possible to Sync two clocks...

in order to sync 2 clocks
both clocks would have to
occupy the same space...in time.

but a clock over here and
the other clock over there are
in two different points in
space and time.

There are too many forces
affecting each clock in
different direction
in space and time.


common sense would tell you
that it is not possible to Sync two clocks...


How about one clock that runs
slow and fast in sync????

(it works with einstein's theory of relativity)



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
> >
> > Den 23.08.2024 13:57, skrev Doctor Richard Hachel:
> > > Le 23/08/2024 à 13:23, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> > >
> > >> Den 22.08.2024 21:12, skrev Doctor Richard Hachel:
> > >>
> > >>> Can you explain to me, in the greatest clarity, as Python recommends,
> > >>> what you mean, what you understand by the following words:
> > >>> "In special relativity, the notion of simultaneity is relative"?
> >
> > "The notion of simultaneity" is a very basic concept in SR.
> >
> > So I seriously think that:
> > >> It is remarkable that a person who pride himself of having studied
> > >> relativity issues for 40 years is ignorant of the most basic concepts
> > >> in the Special Theory of Relativity.
> >
> > You can't expect me to teach you the basic concepts of SR in this forum.
> >
> > So:
> > >> I am not going to teach you SR (or GR).
> > >> If you really want to learn, read a book.
> >
> > This is my serious advice, I am not joking.
> >
> > >
> > > Please, a little more seriousness and dignity in your answers.
> > >
> >
> > More dignity? Should I address you with "Doctor" or "Sir"?
> 
> "Monsieur"
> 
> "Monsieur Hachelllll"
> 
> Cher Monsieur
> 
> ooh la la
> 
> Sacre le blu!
> 
> Monsieur Hachelllll
> 
> Mec Hachel
> 
> Je me casse....
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#889195

W dniu 25.08.2024 o 18:36, The Starmaker pisze:
> Now, common sense would tell you
> that it is not possible to Sync two clocks...

It's not common sense, it is some
brainwashed madness of some moronic
church.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#889202

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Now, common sense would tell you
> that it is not possible to Sync two clocks...
> 
> in order to sync 2 clocks
> both clocks would have to
> occupy the same space...in time.
> 
> but a clock over here and
> the other clock over there are
> in two different points in
> space and time.
> 
> There are too many forces
> affecting each clock in
> different direction
> in space and time.
> 
> common sense would tell you
> that it is not possible to Sync two clocks...
> 
> How about one clock that runs
> slow and fast in sync????
> 
> (it works with einstein's theory of relativity)

Now, I'll explain einstein's 'one-clock' theory of relativity
where one clock runs slow and fast at the same time...


Einstein is sitting
on a hot stove...
at the same moment
A girl is also siting
on Einstein's lap.

So, time (his clock, his frame of reference) is going slow and fast for
him at the same time. Relativity speaking.




am i wrong?









-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web