Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #882813 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-11-17 12:49 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-11-26 19:57 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 43 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-17 12:49 -0800
Re: Sun "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-11-17 17:31 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-17 21:22 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-17 20:53 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-18 11:58 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-19 13:40 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-19 18:02 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-19 21:27 -0800
Re: Sun Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 22:20 -0800
Re: Sun Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-20 02:16 -0500
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-19 23:42 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-20 00:06 -0800
Re: Sun Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-11-20 08:21 -0800
Re: Sun Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-11-20 08:24 -0800
Re: Sun Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-20 13:47 -0500
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-21 00:00 -0800
Re: Sun Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-11-21 09:15 -0800
Re: Sun Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-21 18:55 -0600
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-22 11:20 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-22 16:11 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-22 16:22 -0800
Re: Sun Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-22 18:38 -0600
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-22 22:31 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-23 22:02 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-23 22:31 -0800
Re: Sun Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-11-23 22:45 -0800
Re: Sun Jonathanrob Bakhtiarov <rajr@ttjijhtt.an> - 2023-11-24 19:00 +0000
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-24 11:19 -0800
Re: Sun Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-11-24 12:28 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-24 16:00 -0800
Re: Sun Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-24 19:51 -0600
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-24 21:16 -0800
Re: Sun Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-11-28 08:39 -0800
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-24 21:36 -0800
Re: Sun Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-25 07:36 +0100
Re: Sun Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-11-25 06:33 -0800
Re: Sun Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-24 19:42 -0600
Re: Sun Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Sun Uriah Bahmatoff <mbut@tbafffff.ar> - 2023-11-26 19:48 +0000
Re: Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-26 13:31 -0800
Re: Sun Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-11-20 12:14 -0600
Re: Sun Y A A A A A A A A A A A a a a a a a a a <autokemidaeioleveel@outlook.com> - 2023-11-26 10:37 -0800
Re: Sun Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-11-26 19:57 -0800
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-17 12:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Sun |
| Message-ID | <6557D1BC.4008@ix.netcom.com> |
earth and other things revolve around the sun... that can only mean one thing.. the sun is not moving. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-17 17:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <10590079-20ec-4c7b-bac3-0ed17feeb08dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #882813 |
On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 12:48:43 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > earth and other things revolve > around the sun... > that can only mean one thing.. > the sun is not moving. No. The Sun takes the solar system around the Milky Way... There is no absolute rest... > > > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-17 21:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <65584A2B.5285@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882829 |
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 12:48:43 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > earth and other things revolve > > around the sun... > > that can only mean one thing.. > > the sun is not moving. > > No. The Sun takes the solar system around > the Milky Way... There is no absolute rest... The Sun takes the solar system around???? isn't it the other way around?? > > > > > > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-17 20:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <65584367.48C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882813 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > earth and other things revolve > around the sun... > that can only mean one thing.. > the sun is not moving. it is my undrstanding... the sun being a star.. that there are no stars that move. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-18 11:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <65591773.3F13@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882834 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > earth and other things revolve > > around the sun... > > that can only mean one thing.. > > the sun is not moving. > > it is my undrstanding... > the sun being a star.. > that there are no stars that move. > Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where did it go???? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-19 13:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <655A80D1.147A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882847 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > earth and other things revolve > > > around the sun... > > > that can only mean one thing.. > > > the sun is not moving. > > > > it is my undrstanding... > > the sun being a star.. > > that there are no stars that move. > > > > Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > did it go???? Does that North star ever move??? (by move, i mean move it's position) > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-19 18:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <655ABE44.1BB4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882885 |
Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > earth and other things revolve > > > > > around the sun... > > > > > that can only mean one thing.. > > > > > the sun is not moving. > > > > > > > > it is my undrstanding... > > > > the sun being a star.. > > > > that there are no stars that move. > > > > > > > > > > Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > > > did it go???? > > Does that North star ever move??? > > > > (by move, i mean move it's position) > > Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. You maean North of the North pole is...up? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-19 21:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <655AEE47.4585@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882895 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > earth and other things revolve > > > > > > around the sun... > > > > > > that can only mean one thing.. > > > > > > the sun is not moving. > > > > > > > > > > it is my undrstanding... > > > > > the sun being a star.. > > > > > that there are no stars that move. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > > > > did it go???? > > > Does that North star ever move??? > > > > > > (by move, i mean move it's position) > > > > Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. > > You maean North of the North pole is...up? Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. It does not move. Where does it say Polaris...moves? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-19 22:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56c87087-8e12-40b6-a018-4801095a07b7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #882900 |
On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth and other things revolve > > > > > > > around the sun... > > > > > > > that can only mean one thing.. > > > > > > > the sun is not moving. > > > > > > > > > > > > it is my undrstanding... > > > > > > the sun being a star.. > > > > > > that there are no stars that move. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > > > > > did it go???? > > > > Does that North star ever move??? > > > > > > > > (by move, i mean move it's position) > > > > > > Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. > > > > You maean North of the North pole is...up? > Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't > mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. > > It does not move. > > Where does it say Polaris...moves? Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-20 02:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ujf142$7m81$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #882902 |
On 11/20/2023 1:20 AM, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> Paul Alsing wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> earth and other things revolve >>>>>>>> around the sun... >>>>>>>> that can only mean one thing.. >>>>>>>> the sun is not moving. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> it is my undrstanding... >>>>>>> the sun being a star.. >>>>>>> that there are no stars that move. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where >>>>>> did it go???? >>>>> Does that North star ever move??? >>>>> >>>>> (by move, i mean move it's position) >>>> >>>> Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. >>> >>> You maean North of the North pole is...up? >> Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't >> mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. >> >> It does not move. >> >> Where does it say Polaris...moves? > > Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period! Since Polaris has a declination of +89° 15′ 51″, it does move in a (small) circle. A circle more than the full moon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-19 23:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <655B0DE6.1675@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882903 |
Volney wrote: > > On 11/20/2023 1:20 AM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> > >>> Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> earth and other things revolve > >>>>>>>> around the sun... > >>>>>>>> that can only mean one thing.. > >>>>>>>> the sun is not moving. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> it is my undrstanding... > >>>>>>> the sun being a star.. > >>>>>>> that there are no stars that move. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > >>>>>> did it go???? > >>>>> Does that North star ever move??? > >>>>> > >>>>> (by move, i mean move it's position) > >>>> > >>>> Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. > >>> > >>> You maean North of the North pole is...up? > > >> Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't > >> mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. > >> > >> It does not move. > >> > >> Where does it say Polaris...moves? > > > > Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period! > > Since Polaris has a declination of +89° 15′ 51″, it does move in a > (small) circle. A circle more than the full moon. It doesn't move from the place it is located. It might spin, revolve..go around in circles...but it doesn't move from it's position. position means the place it is located. It won't move from that place. If you tie a dog to a tree, you can say "Don't worry, he won't move from there." He can bark, jump, or hang himself with the leash...but he won't move from there. None of the stars in the universe ...move. None of the stars in the universe will change their position. The dog is not going anywhere. See Spot run in circle See Spot ain't going no where. "Don't worry, he won't move from there." Stars do not change the place or the position they are in. The Big Dipper has always been in the same place since the beginning of time. It hasn't moved. Do I have to name all the other stars???? Sun? really? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-20 00:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <655B137B.2911@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882906 |
wait a minute here...you guys are not going to tell me the sun sets and the sun rises, are you? The Starmaker wrote: > > Volney wrote: > > > > On 11/20/2023 1:20 AM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> earth and other things revolve > > >>>>>>>> around the sun... > > >>>>>>>> that can only mean one thing.. > > >>>>>>>> the sun is not moving. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> it is my undrstanding... > > >>>>>>> the sun being a star.. > > >>>>>>> that there are no stars that move. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > > >>>>>> did it go???? > > >>>>> Does that North star ever move??? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> (by move, i mean move it's position) > > >>>> > > >>>> Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. > > >>> > > >>> You maean North of the North pole is...up? > > > > >> Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't > > >> mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. > > >> > > >> It does not move. > > >> > > >> Where does it say Polaris...moves? > > > > > > Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period! > > > > Since Polaris has a declination of +89° 15′ 51″, it does move in a > > (small) circle. A circle more than the full moon. > > It doesn't move from the place it is located. It might spin, revolve..go > around in circles...but it doesn't move from it's position. > > position means the place it is located. It won't move from that place. > > If you tie a dog to a tree, you can say "Don't worry, he won't move from > there." > > He can bark, jump, or hang himself with the leash...but he won't move > from there. > > None of the stars in the universe ...move. > > None of the stars in the universe will change their position. > > The dog is not going anywhere. > > See Spot run in circle > See Spot ain't going no where. > > "Don't worry, he won't move from there." > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in. > > The Big Dipper has always been in the same place since the beginning of > time. It hasn't moved. > > Do I have to name all the other stars???? > > Sun? > > really? > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-20 08:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e092525c-d90f-45fe-8bbc-a8b798e20ad6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #882906 |
On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 11:42:09 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > Volney wrote: > > > > On 11/20/2023 1:20 AM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> earth and other things revolve > > >>>>>>>> around the sun... > > >>>>>>>> that can only mean one thing.. > > >>>>>>>> the sun is not moving. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> it is my undrstanding... > > >>>>>>> the sun being a star.. > > >>>>>>> that there are no stars that move. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > > >>>>>> did it go???? > > >>>>> Does that North star ever move??? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> (by move, i mean move it's position) > > >>>> > > >>>> Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. > > >>> > > >>> You maean North of the North pole is...up? > > > > >> Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't > > >> mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. > > >> > > >> It does not move. > > >> > > >> Where does it say Polaris...moves? > > > > > > Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period! > > > > Since Polaris has a declination of +89° 15′ 51″, it does move in a > > (small) circle. A circle more than the full moon. > It doesn't move from the place it is located. It might spin, revolve..go > around in circles...but it doesn't move from it's position. > > position means the place it is located. It won't move from that place. > > If you tie a dog to a tree, you can say "Don't worry, he won't move from > there." > > He can bark, jump, or hang himself with the leash...but he won't move > from there. > > > None of the stars in the universe ...move. > > None of the stars in the universe will change their position. > > The dog is not going anywhere. > > > See Spot run in circle > See Spot ain't going no where. > > > "Don't worry, he won't move from there." > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in. > > > The Big Dipper has always been in the same place since the beginning of > time. It hasn't moved. > > Do I have to name all the other stars???? > > Sun? > > > > really? > -- You are advised to study the definition of "proper motion" as an astronomical term. The Big Dipper, from here on Earth, looked very different in the past and will look very different in the future because its stars, like all other stars, move around with respect to each other!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-20 08:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <98f19940-4684-4411-a50c-69d44553bcf8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #882921 |
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 8:21:14 AM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 11:42:09 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > Volney wrote: > > > > > > On 11/20/2023 1:20 AM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Paul Alsing wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> earth and other things revolve > > > >>>>>>>> around the sun... > > > >>>>>>>> that can only mean one thing.. > > > >>>>>>>> the sun is not moving. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> it is my undrstanding... > > > >>>>>>> the sun being a star.. > > > >>>>>>> that there are no stars that move. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > > > >>>>>> did it go???? > > > >>>>> Does that North star ever move??? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> (by move, i mean move it's position) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. > > > >>> > > > >>> You maean North of the North pole is...up? > > > > > > >> Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't > > > >> mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. > > > >> > > > >> It does not move. > > > >> > > > >> Where does it say Polaris...moves? > > > > > > > > Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period! > > > > > > Since Polaris has a declination of +89° 15′ 51″, it does move in a > > > (small) circle. A circle more than the full moon. > > It doesn't move from the place it is located. It might spin, revolve..go > > around in circles...but it doesn't move from it's position. > > > > position means the place it is located. It won't move from that place. > > > > If you tie a dog to a tree, you can say "Don't worry, he won't move from > > there." > > > > He can bark, jump, or hang himself with the leash...but he won't move > > from there. > > > > > > None of the stars in the universe ...move. > > > > None of the stars in the universe will change their position. > > > > The dog is not going anywhere. > > > > > > See Spot run in circle > > See Spot ain't going no where. > > > > > > "Don't worry, he won't move from there." > > > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in. > > > > > > The Big Dipper has always been in the same place since the beginning of > > time. It hasn't moved. > > > > Do I have to name all the other stars???? > > > > Sun? > > > > > > > > really? > > -- > You are advised to study the definition of "proper motion" as an astronomical term. > > The Big Dipper, from here on Earth, looked very different in the past and will look very different in the future because its stars, like all other stars, move around with respect to each other! https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a20347/how-the-big-dipper-has-changedand-will-changeover-200000-years/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-20 13:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ujg9ko$e10h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #882906 |
On 11/20/2023 2:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Volney wrote: >> >> On 11/20/2023 1:20 AM, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> earth and other things revolve >>>>>>>>>> around the sun... >>>>>>>>>> that can only mean one thing.. >>>>>>>>>> the sun is not moving. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> it is my undrstanding... >>>>>>>>> the sun being a star.. >>>>>>>>> that there are no stars that move. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where >>>>>>>> did it go???? >>>>>>> Does that North star ever move??? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (by move, i mean move it's position) >>>>>> >>>>>> Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. >>>>> >>>>> You maean North of the North pole is...up? >> >>>> Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't >>>> mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. >>>> >>>> It does not move. >>>> >>>> Where does it say Polaris...moves? >>> >>> Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period! >> >> Since Polaris has a declination of +89° 15′ 51″, it does move in a >> (small) circle. A circle more than the full moon. > > It doesn't move from the place it is located. It might spin, revolve..go > around in circles...but it doesn't move from it's position. > > position means the place it is located. It won't move from that place. > > If you tie a dog to a tree, you can say "Don't worry, he won't move from > there." > > He can bark, jump, or hang himself with the leash...but he won't move > from there. > > > None of the stars in the universe ...move. > > None of the stars in the universe will change their position. > > The dog is not going anywhere. > > > See Spot run in circle > See Spot ain't going no where. > > > "Don't worry, he won't move from there." > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in. So you changed your claim that Polaris doesn't move like the other stars do around the celestial North Pole, and when Paul and I showed you to be wrong, you changed your claim to be something like the stars don't move across the sky, only in circles. All star "dogs" are tied to the tree, it's just that Polaris has a much shorter leash than the others. > > > The Big Dipper has always been in the same place since the beginning of > time. It hasn't moved. The stars do move across the sky (proper motion), but do so slowly enough so that ordinary stargazers won't notice. You can find pictures of what the distorted Big Dipper will look like in a few thousand years on the web. > > Do I have to name all the other stars???? > > Sun? > > > > really? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-21 00:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <655C63B3.3DF8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882932 |
Volney wrote: > > On 11/20/2023 2:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Volney wrote: > >> > >> On 11/20/2023 1:20 AM, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> earth and other things revolve > >>>>>>>>>> around the sun... > >>>>>>>>>> that can only mean one thing.. > >>>>>>>>>> the sun is not moving. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> it is my undrstanding... > >>>>>>>>> the sun being a star.. > >>>>>>>>> that there are no stars that move. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > >>>>>>>> did it go???? > >>>>>>> Does that North star ever move??? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> (by move, i mean move it's position) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. > >>>>> > >>>>> You maean North of the North pole is...up? > >> > >>>> Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't > >>>> mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. > >>>> > >>>> It does not move. > >>>> > >>>> Where does it say Polaris...moves? > >>> > >>> Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period! > >> > >> Since Polaris has a declination of +89° 15′ 51″, it does move in a > >> (small) circle. A circle more than the full moon. > > > > It doesn't move from the place it is located. It might spin, revolve..go > > around in circles...but it doesn't move from it's position. > > > > position means the place it is located. It won't move from that place. > > > > If you tie a dog to a tree, you can say "Don't worry, he won't move from > > there." > > > > He can bark, jump, or hang himself with the leash...but he won't move > > from there. > > > > > > None of the stars in the universe ...move. > > > > None of the stars in the universe will change their position. > > > > The dog is not going anywhere. > > > > > > See Spot run in circle > > See Spot ain't going no where. > > > > > > "Don't worry, he won't move from there." > > > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in. > > So you changed your claim that Polaris doesn't move like the other stars > do around the celestial North Pole, and when Paul and I showed you to be > wrong, you changed your claim to be something like the stars don't move > across the sky, only in circles. No, I did not 'change my claim'... it's just yous people don't understand simple English. I wrote "stars don't move'. It's just that yous people don't understand the definition of the word..."move". https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/move to (cause to) change position: a change of place, position, or state. Stars do not change the place or the position they are in, ..they don't MOVE. Stars do not change the place or the position they are in means in fact the same thing..stars don't move! it's not my fault your english teacher was on vacation all year... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-21 09:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9a5dac27-2299-4e40-8d71-6992f6cfe5c2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #882944 |
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 12:00:59 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > Volney wrote: > > > > On 11/20/2023 2:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Volney wrote: > > >> > > >> On 11/20/2023 1:20 AM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> earth and other things revolve > > >>>>>>>>>> around the sun... > > >>>>>>>>>> that can only mean one thing.. > > >>>>>>>>>> the sun is not moving. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> it is my undrstanding... > > >>>>>>>>> the sun being a star.. > > >>>>>>>>> that there are no stars that move. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > > >>>>>>>> did it go???? > > >>>>>>> Does that North star ever move??? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> (by move, i mean move it's position) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> You maean North of the North pole is...up? > > >> > > >>>> Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't > > >>>> mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. > > >>>> > > >>>> It does not move. > > >>>> > > >>>> Where does it say Polaris...moves? > > >>> > > >>> Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period! > > >> > > >> Since Polaris has a declination of +89° 15′ 51″, it does move in a > > >> (small) circle. A circle more than the full moon. > > > > > > It doesn't move from the place it is located. It might spin, revolve..go > > > around in circles...but it doesn't move from it's position. > > > > > > position means the place it is located. It won't move from that place. > > > > > > If you tie a dog to a tree, you can say "Don't worry, he won't move from > > > there." > > > > > > He can bark, jump, or hang himself with the leash...but he won't move > > > from there. > > > > > > > > > None of the stars in the universe ...move. > > > > > > None of the stars in the universe will change their position. > > > > > > The dog is not going anywhere. > > > > > > > > > See Spot run in circle > > > See Spot ain't going no where. > > > > > > > > > "Don't worry, he won't move from there." > > > > > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in. > > > > So you changed your claim that Polaris doesn't move like the other stars > > do around the celestial North Pole, and when Paul and I showed you to be > > wrong, you changed your claim to be something like the stars don't move > > across the sky, only in circles. > No, I did not 'change my claim'... > > it's just yous people don't understand simple English. > > I wrote "stars don't move'. > > It's just that yous people don't understand the definition of the > word..."move". > > > > https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/move > to (cause to) change position: > > a change of place, position, or state. > > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in, ..they don't > MOVE. > > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in means in fact > the same thing..stars don't move! > Are sure about this? >https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnard%27s_Star https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_motion
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-21 18:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ujjjik$1qdvo$4@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #882944 |
On 11/21/2023 2:00 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > it's not my fault your english teacher was on vacation all year... > > Must've been sick of looking at a "vulva" sitting there all the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-22 11:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <655E5476.4A80@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882944 |
maybe these other stars are so far away that it is hard for yous to be sure (or not even there anymore) but our sun doesn't move. It might appear to move... everything else is moving around it (including the entire space.. but our sun doesn't move. And what about our Moon? It don't move either! i wanna see the dark side of the moon...but for some reason it just doesn't wanna move. The Starmaker wrote: > > Volney wrote: > > > > On 11/20/2023 2:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Volney wrote: > > >> > > >> On 11/20/2023 1:20 AM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 9:27:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Sunday, November 19, 2023 at 1:40:11 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> earth and other things revolve > > >>>>>>>>>> around the sun... > > >>>>>>>>>> that can only mean one thing.. > > >>>>>>>>>> the sun is not moving. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> it is my undrstanding... > > >>>>>>>>> the sun being a star.. > > >>>>>>>>> that there are no stars that move. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hey! Where is the Big Dipper? I don't see it...it must have moved! Where > > >>>>>>>> did it go???? > > >>>>>>> Does that North star ever move??? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> (by move, i mean move it's position) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Since it is not *exactly* above the pole, yes, it does. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> You maean North of the North pole is...up? > > >> > > >>>> Just because it is above/up the pole of the North pole above up doesn't > > >>>> mean it is moving. Polaris does not move it's position. It is ...fixed. > > >>>> > > >>>> It does not move. > > >>>> > > >>>> Where does it say Polaris...moves? > > >>> > > >>> Are you really this uninformed? ANY star that does not have a declination of +90 or -90 is going to rotate around the pole... period! > > >> > > >> Since Polaris has a declination of +89° 15′ 51″, it does move in a > > >> (small) circle. A circle more than the full moon. > > > > > > It doesn't move from the place it is located. It might spin, revolve..go > > > around in circles...but it doesn't move from it's position. > > > > > > position means the place it is located. It won't move from that place. > > > > > > If you tie a dog to a tree, you can say "Don't worry, he won't move from > > > there." > > > > > > He can bark, jump, or hang himself with the leash...but he won't move > > > from there. > > > > > > > > > None of the stars in the universe ...move. > > > > > > None of the stars in the universe will change their position. > > > > > > The dog is not going anywhere. > > > > > > > > > See Spot run in circle > > > See Spot ain't going no where. > > > > > > > > > "Don't worry, he won't move from there." > > > > > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in. > > > > So you changed your claim that Polaris doesn't move like the other stars > > do around the celestial North Pole, and when Paul and I showed you to be > > wrong, you changed your claim to be something like the stars don't move > > across the sky, only in circles. > > No, I did not 'change my claim'... > > it's just yous people don't understand simple English. > > I wrote "stars don't move'. > > It's just that yous people don't understand the definition of the > word..."move". > > https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/move > to (cause to) change position: > > a change of place, position, or state. > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in, ..they don't > MOVE. > > Stars do not change the place or the position they are in means in fact > the same thing..stars don't move! > > it's not my fault your english teacher was on vacation all year... > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-11-22 16:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <655E98B8.2586@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #882982 |
Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 11:58:55 AM UTC-8, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Wednesday, 22 November 2023 at 20:52:33 UTC+1, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 11:20:22 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > maybe these other stars are so far away that it is hard for yous to be > > > > sure > > > > (or not even there anymore) > > > > > > > > but our sun doesn't move. > > > > > > > > It might appear to move... > > > > everything else is moving around it > > > > (including the entire space.. > > > > but our sun doesn't move. > > > Sure it does... > > > > > > "Yes, the Sun - in fact, our whole solar system - orbits around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. > > > So even you aren't really stupid enough to believe in relative motion, Al. > > Well, well. > > Relative motion is obviously a real thing, Woz, no matter how many times you wish to deny it! does our moon revolve around our sun? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web