Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #869749 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-02-14 11:51 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-02-17 22:16 -0800 |
| Articles | 7 on this page of 27 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-14 11:51 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-14 16:00 -0500
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-16 15:17 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:28 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 22:11 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 12:06 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-18 12:33 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 14:47 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 12:55 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 16:40 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-04 12:57 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-03-04 14:13 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-04 23:13 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-05 22:06 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-06 12:10 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-06 22:58 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-08 10:08 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-19 16:50 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-19 19:21 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-19 14:49 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD John-Paul Mosconi <hmus@omsjcmcu.ao> - 2023-04-07 00:20 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD James Willi Negri <lnes@allligal.nr> - 2023-04-10 23:01 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-10 22:35 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Dentcho Rustici <osin@icctcesd.do> - 2023-04-11 17:03 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Bubba Pagano <nuan@bappn.bb> - 2023-02-26 21:17 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:40 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 22:16 -0800
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | John-Paul Mosconi <hmus@omsjcmcu.ao> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-07 00:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u0nnl8$i1sq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #871473 |
JanPB wrote: >> [Geo. Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA] >> March 19, 2023 . >> Dear Carmine Benedetti: – >> Listen you Mafia fathead, you don't know any scientific mathematics – a >> 2nd rank tensor can be written as a MATRIX and at the 2nd rank tensor >> multiplication is simply matrix multiplication! > > Only when a basis has been specifically given. Tensors are multilinear > maps, not matrices. > >> No Einstein index summation needed! > > Nothing is *needed*. It's just a nice notation. bullshit, he didn't undrestood tensors, that notation is nil. He was in bed with his cousin. Long time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Willi Negri <lnes@allligal.nr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-10 23:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u124fj$2blin$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #871473 |
George Hammond wrote: > Therefore the Einstein, Friedmann, and Hammond "TENSOR METRICS" can be > written as simple 4x4 MATRICES ~ > | 1 o o o. | > | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC | o o 1 o. | > | o o o -1.| nonsense, you treat tensors like matrices. You can't even rotate nor translate with your matrices. You are insignificant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-10 22:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6434F195.462C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #871473 |
George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 5:32:44 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> > > [George Hammond] wrote:
> > > – a 2nd rank tensor
> > > can be written as a MATRIX and at the 2nd rank,
> > > tensor multiplication is simply matrix multiplication!
> .
> > [JanPB] wrote:
> > Only when a basis has been specifically given.
> > Jan
> .
> [George Hammond] wrote:
> Naturally; "A basis has been specifically given" ~
> ....Cartesian Coordinates are the BASIS and have
> been used exclusively. Therefore the
> Einstein, Friedmann, and Hammond
> "TENSOR METRICS" can be written as simple
> 4x4 MATRICES ~
> | 1 o o o. |
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> | o o 1 o. |
> | o o o -1.|
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
> |o o a² o. |
> |o o o-1.|
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> ("a" the "scale factor" in the Friedmann and Hammond metrics
> are not the same... in fact in the former "a" is increasing, and in
> the latter "a" is decreasing.)
> .
> But so far, the only EXTRODINARY finding is that da/dt, (called the Hubble
> const.} is only 7%/gigayear in Friedmann's metric, BUT is near 5%/year in
> Hammond's metric meaning the curvature of Subjective spacetime is a
> BILLION times larger than the curvature of objective spacetime
> EXCEPT in the vicinity of a BLACK HOLE.... which brings up the
> question of whether a Black Hole phenomenology is involved in
> human life .. and if so, HOW? ~~~ And I would politely suggest
> that since GRAVITY is the cause of spacetime curvature sui generous,
> that the enormous spacetime curvature involved in human growth
> may indicate the influence of a Black Hole curvature at work at
> the Quantum Gravity level in the brain (as suggested by Roger Penrose),
> and might have some connection to the question of Life After Death,
> so callled?
> .
> George
There is no Life after Death because there is no Life.
jiggling atoms are just an animation.
You're just with the illusion of being alive.
No one is alive or dead.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dentcho Rustici <osin@icctcesd.do> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-11 17:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u143t7$2m6bo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #871473 |
George Hammond wrote: > And you will find that for ordinary coordinate systems (Cartesian, > Polar, > Spherical) a 2nd rank tensor CAN BE represented as a MATRIX. In > particular the METRIC TENSOR is commonly written as a 4 x 4 MATRIX ! > . > | 1 o o o. | > | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC | o o 1 o. | > | o o o -1.| you treat tensors like matrices. It's about *_values_allocated_* infinitesimal *_control_volumes_*, since sooner than later, you have to allocate those values to the manifold. Kiss my ass. you undrestand nothen in physics, and must be from cacanada, whereas justin castro trudeau gives you money for signing a petition, euthanizing you. And your khazar family. Better move from cacanadistan and start learning physics. Math alone is for gays and travesties.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bubba Pagano <nuan@bappn.bb> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-26 21:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ttgia0$315ib$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #870366 |
George Hammond wrote: > [George E Hammond MS Physics]. > . > ............................................................YOU GOTTA BE > KIDDING !! > . > I just got through telling you below that: – > . > I SPOKE TO THIS AUDIENCE OF 200 PSYCHOLOGISTS FOR 35 MINUTES AND > RECEIVED A RESOUNDING OVATION ! pull my finger. So I can leak a fart.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-17 10:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63EFCA28.6695@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #869831 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > worm food wrote: > > > > On 2/14/2023 2:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > George Hammond wrote: > > >> > > >> On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote: > > >>>> [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven > > >>>> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that > > >>>> THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the > > >>>> King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions! > > >>>> . > > >>> > > >>> [worm food wrote]: > > >>> George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink > > >>> (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and > > >>> he may have a lot to talk about. > > >>> > > >> [George Hammond MS Physics] > > >> Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance > > >> that you might be a serious person – > > >> . > > >> I have the following questions for you: – > > >> . > > >> 1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the > > >> name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted > > >> for this specific post? > > >> . > > >> You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since > > >> you quoted the entire message in your post? > > >> . > > >> 2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have > > >> ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work > > >> is entirely about : > > >> . > > >> QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY > > >> . > > >> while my work is all about : > > >> . > > >> RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY > > >> . > > >> THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC > > >> COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ? > > >> . > > >> Truly yours, George > > > > > > > > > Objectivism is ...antiquated. > > > > > > Your proof of God > > > needs to be added > > > to that pile > > > of > > > burning books of history. > > > > > > Couldn't you come up with something new???? > > > > > > maybe a better mousetrap. > > > > > > throw yourself on dat fire.. > > > > > > food for fire. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see Loki is out here doing [god's] work. > > I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd? Actually, your reference to 'god' is...thrice. [god's] Loki and... "I see..." The all seeing god. Now, it's dat odd? I mean Is dat odd? dat you would mentioned 'god' thrice in one sentence?? I mean, is dat odd? I mean, ...Yes, dat is Odd. I mean if others are wondering is dat odd? The answer is Yes... That is Odd. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-17 22:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63F06D28.7AD1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #869869 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > worm food wrote: > > > > > > On 2/14/2023 2:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > George Hammond wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote: > > > >>>> [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven > > > >>>> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that > > > >>>> THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the > > > >>>> King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions! > > > >>>> . > > > >>> > > > >>> [worm food wrote]: > > > >>> George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink > > > >>> (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and > > > >>> he may have a lot to talk about. > > > >>> > > > >> [George Hammond MS Physics] > > > >> Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance > > > >> that you might be a serious person – > > > >> . > > > >> I have the following questions for you: – > > > >> . > > > >> 1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the > > > >> name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted > > > >> for this specific post? > > > >> . > > > >> You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since > > > >> you quoted the entire message in your post? > > > >> . > > > >> 2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have > > > >> ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work > > > >> is entirely about : > > > >> . > > > >> QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY > > > >> . > > > >> while my work is all about : > > > >> . > > > >> RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY > > > >> . > > > >> THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC > > > >> COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ? > > > >> . > > > >> Truly yours, George > > > > > > > > > > > > Objectivism is ...antiquated. > > > > > > > > Your proof of God > > > > needs to be added > > > > to that pile > > > > of > > > > burning books of history. > > > > > > > > Couldn't you come up with something new???? > > > > > > > > maybe a better mousetrap. > > > > > > > > throw yourself on dat fire.. > > > > > > > > food for fire. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see Loki is out here doing [god's] work. > > > > I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd? > > Actually, your reference to 'god' is...thrice. > > [god's] > Loki > and... > > "I see..." > > The all seeing god. > > Now, it's dat odd? > > I mean > > Is dat odd? dat you would mentioned 'god' thrice in one sentence?? > > I mean, is dat odd? > > I mean, ...Yes, > > dat is Odd. > > I mean > if others > are wondering > is dat odd? > > The answer is > Yes... > That is Odd. Worm food and odd bodkin are one and the same person. the odd bodkin is back. or at least tryin to slime back... but he cannot burn his ...fingerprints. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web