Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #866172 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-12-14 09:56 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-04-01 13:49 -0700 |
| Articles | 13 on this page of 93 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-14 09:56 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 18:20 +0000
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 13:41 -0600
Re: ChatGPT Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 18:23 +0000
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-14 23:31 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-15 10:04 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 23:33 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 23:39 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2022-12-15 12:35 -0600
Re: ChatGPT James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 13:09 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-21 13:32 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 21:39 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-22 07:53 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 12:36 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-22 13:08 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-21 11:14 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-30 16:51 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 19:14 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 17:10 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 17:38 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 19:21 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 20:26 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:30 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-02 06:50 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:18 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-02 09:19 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-01 22:51 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:41 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-02 08:22 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:28 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-03 09:54 -0600
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:39 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:36 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:39 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 18:06 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 20:28 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:53 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:20 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 23:50 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:25 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 19:26 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 10:33 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 12:35 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 21:11 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 14:00 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-05 16:53 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 14:51 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 15:21 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-20 10:53 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 16:13 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 19:24 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 22:20 -0600
Re: ChatGPT Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 22:12 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 14:19 -0500
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-27 15:56 -0600
Re: ChatGPT Dasha Linde <dashalinde@pptp.de> - 2023-02-28 00:23 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 23:40 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-26 01:54 -0600
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 17:12 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 18:55 +0000
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:12 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 11:53 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 21:20 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 21:43 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-27 12:26 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 13:05 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:36 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-30 11:07 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-01 10:22 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-08 15:29 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-11 10:57 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 18:45 -0700
Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 21:05 -0500
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 19:40 -0700
Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 -0500
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 22:22 -0700
Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 03:31 -0500
Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 18:17 -0500
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 21:16 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:57 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-01 16:47 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-02 17:24 -0600
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 16:45 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 11:18 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 12:06 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-03 20:39 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:22 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:27 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:51 -0600
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:41 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-12 11:01 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 14:15 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-04-01 13:49 -0700
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-01 16:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FFF23A.59F4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870489 |
You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth, right? you guys are...obsolete. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-02 17:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k6cphhFq54lU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #870517 |
On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth, > right? > > you guys are...obsolete. That's a mater of opinion. I ran across your theme song. Looks like you misplaced it so here's a link for you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woWzNRIBEcI
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-02 16:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ttrfv0$e66f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #870549 |
On 3/2/2023 3:24 PM, whodat wrote: > On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth, >> right? >> >> you guys are...obsolete. > > That's a mater of opinion. I ran across your theme song. Looks > like you misplaced it so here's a link for you. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woWzNRIBEcI > This song makes me want to drink a beer. lol. ;^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-03 11:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <640247F5.3FA8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870549 |
whodat wrote: > > On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth, > > right? > > > > you guys are...obsolete. > > That's a mater of opinion. It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact. You have been replaced by ChatGPT. Is there any reason to hire another computer programmer? when you can just use ChatGPT to help your least knowledgeable computer programmer???? The horse was replaced by the car. You've been replaced. You're obsolete. .. to be or become obsolete by replacing it with something new. Everyone knows that..yous scientists have no patience for, stupidity. How do you make a pencil? Ask ChatGPT. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-03 12:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <tttk0e$ned2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #870563 |
On 3/3/2023 11:18 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > whodat wrote: >> >> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth, >>> right? >>> >>> you guys are...obsolete. >> >> That's a mater of opinion. > > It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact. > > You have been replaced by ChatGPT. > > Is there any reason to hire another computer programmer? when you can > just use ChatGPT to > help your least knowledgeable computer programmer???? [..] LOL! I would not trust ChatGPT wrt code. No way, no how.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-03 20:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k6fpbtF9lkqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #870563 |
On 3/3/2023 1:18 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > whodat wrote: >> >> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth, >>> right? >>> >>> you guys are...obsolete. >> >> That's a mater of opinion. > > It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact. Thanks for demonstrating your imbecilic thought process. <snip rest of "Starmaker" crap>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-03 21:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6402D5A3.59D6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870583 |
whodat wrote: > > On 3/3/2023 1:18 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > whodat wrote: > >> > >> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth, > >>> right? > >>> > >>> you guys are...obsolete. > >> > >> That's a mater of opinion. > > > > It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact. > > Thanks for demonstrating your imbecilic thought process. Well of course 'FACTS' is not something you're familiar with... over 50% of high schools in New York City don't even offer physics. bad enough they cannot find qualified physics teachers... anyone here qualified here to teach physics? maybe Richard Hammond? Dono? Pentcho Valev? Mitch? Ken Seto??? It's over. Yous cannot even keep physics in Usenet anymore... If you cannot compete with...ChatGPT, it game over. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-03 21:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6402D6BE.3ADA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870592 |
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> whodat wrote:
> >
> > On 3/3/2023 1:18 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > whodat wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth,
> > >>> right?
> > >>>
> > >>> you guys are...obsolete.
> > >>
> > >> That's a mater of opinion.
> > >
> > > It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact.
> >
> > Thanks for demonstrating your imbecilic thought process.
>
> Well of course 'FACTS' is not something you're familiar with...
>
> over 50% of high schools in New York City don't even offer physics.
>
> bad enough they cannot find qualified physics teachers...
>
> anyone here qualified here to teach physics? maybe Richard Hammond?
> Dono? Pentcho Valev? Mitch? Ken Seto???
>
> It's over.
>
> Yous cannot even keep physics in Usenet anymore...
>
> If you cannot compete with...ChatGPT, it game over.
facts
Of all school subjects, Physics has the most severe teacher shortage, followed by math and chemistry. There are large surpluses of biology and earth science teachers.
Only 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have a degree in physics or physics education.
Almost 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have taken fewer than 3 college physics classes.
90% of middle school students are taught physical science by a teacher lacking a major or certification in the physical sciences (chemistry, geology, general science or physics).
Our local and regional school districts have had substantial difficulty finding and retaining qualified physics teachers. 52% of New York City high schools do not even offer physics.
http://phystec.physics.cornell.edu/content/crisis-physics-education
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-04 13:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k6hlqoFieqvU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #870593 |
On 3/3/2023 11:27 PM, The self proclaimed expert on everything proclaimed: [...] >> Well of course 'FACTS' is not something you're familiar with... You certainly don't know what it is you don't know. To achieve some understanding refer to articles on Kruger Dunning effect. You don't even realize that simply quoting someone else may impute to people with your characteristics that you actually understand something. But that's not necessarily true, no matter what you believe. Sad day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-04 13:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k6hl6lFieqvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #870592 |
On 3/3/2023 11:22 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > whodat wrote: >> >> On 3/3/2023 1:18 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> whodat wrote: >>>> >>>> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth, >>>>> right? >>>>> >>>>> you guys are...obsolete. >>>> >>>> That's a mater of opinion. >>> >>> It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact. ibid. <snip balance of nonsense>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-12 11:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <uadiuhptpkf3unc5kb7h3vgnf22o32c641@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #866613 |
As you probably already know ChatGPT was programmed by scientists... dats why it gives 'convincing but completely fictitious answers'. dats the way scientist talk. also, as each day passes ChatGPT is being moderated... so, you need to find tricks on How To Bypass it's filters. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-04 14:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <tp4tqa$2j04f$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #866172 |
On 12/14/2022 9:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > ChatGPT looks like > it does a better > job of > writing programs > then all those > guys out there > on freelance sites. > [...] Tell ChatGPT to code itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-01 13:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <u0a5dd$22kod$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #866172 |
On 12/14/2022 9:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > ChatGPT looks like [...] ChatGPT just might be a little bit retarded in certain areas: https://i.ibb.co/DDkwgBB/image.png Humm...
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web