Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #869749 > unrolled thread

Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-14 11:51 -0800
    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-14 16:00 -0500
      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-16 15:17 -0800
        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:28 -0800
          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 22:11 -0800
            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 12:06 -0600
              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-18 12:33 -0800
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 14:47 -0600
              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 12:55 -0800
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 16:40 -0600
                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-04 12:57 -0800
                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-03-04 14:13 -0800
                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-04 23:13 -0800
                      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-05 22:06 -0800
                      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-06 12:10 -0800
                        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-06 22:58 -0800
                          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-08 10:08 -0800
                          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-19 16:50 +0000
                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-19 19:21 +0000
                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-19 14:49 -0700
                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD John-Paul Mosconi <hmus@omsjcmcu.ao> - 2023-04-07 00:20 +0000
                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD James Willi Negri <lnes@allligal.nr> - 2023-04-10 23:01 +0000
                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-10 22:35 -0700
                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Dentcho Rustici <osin@icctcesd.do> - 2023-04-11 17:03 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Bubba Pagano <nuan@bappn.bb> - 2023-02-26 21:17 +0000
        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:40 -0800
          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 22:16 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#869749 — Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote:
> > > [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven
> > > and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that
> > > THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
> > > King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
> > > .
> >
> > [worm food wrote]:
> > George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink
> > (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and
> > he may have a lot to talk about.
> >
> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance
> that you might be a serious person –
> .
> I have the following questions for you: –
> .
> 1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the
> name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted
> for this specific post?
> .
> You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since
> you quoted the entire message in your post?
> .
> 2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have
> ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work
> is entirely about :
> .
> QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
> .
> while my work is all about :
> .
> RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY
> .
> THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC
> COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ?
> .
> Truly yours, George


Objectivism is ...antiquated.

Your proof of God
needs to be added
to that pile
of
burning books of history.

Couldn't you come up with something new????

maybe a better mousetrap.

throw yourself on dat fire..

food for fire.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#869751

On 2/14/2023 2:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote:
>>>> [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven
>>>> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that
>>>> THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
>>>> King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
>>>> .
>>>
>>> [worm food wrote]:
>>> George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink
>>> (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and
>>> he may have a lot to talk about.
>>>
>> [George Hammond MS Physics]
>> Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance
>> that you might be a serious person –
>> .
>> I have the following questions for you: –
>> .
>> 1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the
>> name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted
>> for this specific post?
>> .
>> You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since
>> you quoted the entire message in your post?
>> .
>> 2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have
>> ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work
>> is entirely about :
>> .
>> QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
>> .
>> while my work is all about :
>> .
>> RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY
>> .
>> THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC
>> COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ?
>> .
>> Truly yours, George
> 
> 
> Objectivism is ...antiquated.
> 
> Your proof of God
> needs to be added
> to that pile
> of
> burning books of history.
> 
> Couldn't you come up with something new????
> 
> maybe a better mousetrap.
> 
> throw yourself on dat fire..
> 
> food for fire.
> 
> 
> 

I see Loki is out here doing [god's] work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#869831

worm food wrote:
> 
> On 2/14/2023 2:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote:
> >>>> [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven
> >>>> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that
> >>>> THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
> >>>> King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
> >>>> .
> >>>
> >>> [worm food wrote]:
> >>> George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink
> >>> (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and
> >>> he may have a lot to talk about.
> >>>
> >> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> >> Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance
> >> that you might be a serious person –
> >> .
> >> I have the following questions for you: –
> >> .
> >> 1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the
> >> name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted
> >> for this specific post?
> >> .
> >> You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since
> >> you quoted the entire message in your post?
> >> .
> >> 2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have
> >> ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work
> >> is entirely about :
> >> .
> >> QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
> >> .
> >> while my work is all about :
> >> .
> >> RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY
> >> .
> >> THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC
> >> COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ?
> >> .
> >> Truly yours, George
> >
> >
> > Objectivism is ...antiquated.
> >
> > Your proof of God
> > needs to be added
> > to that pile
> > of
> > burning books of history.
> >
> > Couldn't you come up with something new????
> >
> > maybe a better mousetrap.
> >
> > throw yourself on dat fire..
> >
> > food for fire.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> I see Loki is out here doing [god's] work.


I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd?







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#869868

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:16:48 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd?
> > --
> .
> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> ... Hey STARMAKER – cut the smalltalk –
> lemme tell you something –

smalltalk?  If it isn't Your talk, then it's small talk.


You talk the talk, but do you walk the walk????



or you get monkies to do your walking?


You got top show 'proof yourself' otherwise,
it's just talk.


You don't walk the walk.






> .
> There isn't one person on the face of the earth
> who is INTELLIGENT or EDUCATED enough to
> understand this discovery –
> .
> I only understand it because I spent 30
> years studying PHYSICS and another 20 years
> studying PSYCHOMETRY ! And even then –
> IT WAS AN ACCIDENTAL DISCOVERY !
> .
> It would take the likes of Dick Feynman,
> Albert Einstein, Hans Eysenck, and
> Ray Cattell, and me, all sitting in one room
> discussing this for an hour to confirm it's TRUE.
> .
> And unfortunately all those scientists
> except me, are dead of old age!  And I'm
> 80 years old myself !
> .
> It's a result of their work that I found it
> .
> I don't need to tell you that the world's firs
> ______SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> is important – every God-fearing person in
> the world knows it's important !
> .
> You happen to know any influential JEWS
> who might know some high-ranking Jewish
> ACADEMICS ?  At least THEY would know
> the world political significance of this !
> .
> George

influential JEWS who might know some high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS???? 


Their God is different...they worship a god who is...6 inches tall.


  


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#869912

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > [GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE:
> > do you know some
> > influential JEWS who might know some
> > high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ??
> >
> > [STARMAKER] WROTE:
> > Their God is different...they worship a
> > god who is...6 inches tall.
> >
> [GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
> Here is a list of the top half dozen
> ........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
> 1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
> 2 – University of Haifa
> 3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
> 4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv
> 5 – Tel Aviv University
> 6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
> .
> These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know
> what God is!
> .
> I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
> who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
> .
> All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
> as HEBREW.
> .
> If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
> STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
> who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
> please let them know about this discovery
> of the world's first scientific proof of God
> (relativistic metric of God) – and the fact
> that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately
> looking for them !
> .
> George

A JEWISH PHYSICISTS who knows BOTH what Physics is, and God is...doesn't exist.
...and they certaintly don't want to have anything to
do with scientists who aren't Jewish. 

And they will simply steal your idea and call it their own.

Don't you know their history since the beginning? They are vampires.





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#869929

On 2/18/2023 12:11 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> [GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE:
>>> do you know some
>>> influential JEWS who might know some
>>> high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ??
>>>
>>> [STARMAKER] WROTE:
>>> Their God is different...they worship a
>>> god who is...6 inches tall.
>>>
>> [GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
>> Here is a list of the top half dozen
>> ........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
>> 1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
>> 2 – University of Haifa
>> 3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
>> 4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv
>> 5 – Tel Aviv University
>> 6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
>> .
>> These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know
>> what God is!
>> .
>> I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
>> who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
>> .
>> All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
>> as HEBREW.
>> .
>> If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
>> STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
>> who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
>> please let them know about this discovery
>> of the world's first scientific proof of God
>> (relativistic metric of God) – and the fact
>> that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately
>> looking for them !
>> .
>> George
> 
> A JEWISH PHYSICISTS who knows BOTH what Physics is, and God is...doesn't exist.
> ...and they certaintly don't want to have anything to
> do with scientists who aren't Jewish.
> 
> And they will simply steal your idea and call it their own.
> 
> Don't you know their history since the beginning? They are vampires.

Haven't you ever wondered why nobody has ever considered stealing
any of your ideas? Luck has nothing to do with it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#869942

whodat wrote:
> 
> On 2/18/2023 12:11 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> >>
> >> On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> [GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE:
> >>> do you know some
> >>> influential JEWS who might know some
> >>> high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ??
> >>>
> >>> [STARMAKER] WROTE:
> >>> Their God is different...they worship a
> >>> god who is...6 inches tall.
> >>>
> >> [GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
> >> Here is a list of the top half dozen
> >> ........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
> >> 1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
> >> 2 – University of Haifa
> >> 3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
> >> 4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv
> >> 5 – Tel Aviv University
> >> 6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
> >> .
> >> These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know
> >> what God is!
> >> .
> >> I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
> >> who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
> >> .
> >> All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
> >> as HEBREW.
> >> .
> >> If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
> >> STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
> >> who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
> >> please let them know about this discovery
> >> of the world's first scientific proof of God
> >> (relativistic metric of God) – and the fact
> >> that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately
> >> looking for them !
> >> .
> >> George
> >
> > A JEWISH PHYSICISTS who knows BOTH what Physics is, and God is...doesn't exist.
> > ...and they certaintly don't want to have anything to
> > do with scientists who aren't Jewish.
> >
> > And they will simply steal your idea and call it their own.
> >
> > Don't you know their history since the beginning? They are vampires.
> 
> Haven't you ever wondered why nobody has ever considered stealing
> any of your ideas? Luck has nothing to do with it.


FDR would not bomb train lines to the concentration camps... 

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#869943

On 2/18/2023 2:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> whodat wrote:

[...]

>> Haven't you ever wondered why nobody has ever considered stealing
>> any of your ideas? Luck has nothing to do with it.


> FDR would not bomb train lines to the concentration camps...

Answers, such as you imply here, come very easily when the person
providing doesn't fully understand the question. You're doing such
a nice job of hoisting yourself by your own petard that I don't
feel any need to assist you further.

<https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/petard>

But I'll be only too happy to point out what's happening.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#870366

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Friday, February 24, 2023 at 5:08:11 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> > >
> > > [ Athel Cornish-Bowden] wrote
> > > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist,
> > >
> > >
> > [George Hammond MS Physics]
> > OK Athel- let me give you a 60-sec
> > lecture on Relativity - and then
> > you will be a "Relativity Physicist" !
> > .
> > As an Oxford Chemistry PhD you know
> > the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM --
> > .
> > s² = x²+y²+z² (Pythagorean Theorem in 3D)
> > .
> > Which can be written as a 3x3 matrix:-
> > .
> > | 1 o o |
> > | o 1 o | = Pythagorean theorem
> > | o o 1 |
> > .
> > Relativity is ALL ABOUT the Pythagorean Theorem
> > IN 4D where it's called the Einstein Metric-
> > .
> > ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt² (Einstein metric)
> > .
> > Nevermind the minus sign, it's caused by subtracting
> > the time it takes light to get from one event to another.
> > .
> > This eqn can be written as a 4x4 MATRIX - called the
> > (world famous) "Einstein metric" -
> > .
> > | 1 o o o. |
> > | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> > | o o 1 o. |
> > | o o o -1.|
> > .
> > OK – Einstein used this metric to deduce his
> > Gravitational Field Equations which replaced
> > Newton's simple inverse square law of Gravity.
> > .
> > But then a Russian mathematician named Friedmann
> > proposed that the universe was EXPANDING
> > and he told Einstein that he could simply
> > multiply the spatial part of his metric by an
> > "expansion factor" a=a(t) - and Einstein agreed:
> > .
> > ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²)-dt² (Friedmann metric)
> > .
> > Or written as a matrix :-
> > .
> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
> > |o o a² o. |
> > |o o o..-1.|
> > .
> > Today this metric is called the FLRW metric
> > (Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) metric
> > and rules all of Astrophysics !
> > .
> > .......END 60-sec RELATIVITY LECTURE
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > .....BEGIN 60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE
> > .
> > We want to be as competent as the Jewish Physicists
> > since they not only know PHYSICS, they also know
> > what GOD is; since the Jews wrote the Bible !
> > .... I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant" by birth and I
> > expect you are probably a Wesleyan Methodist
> > since most Cornish people are.
> > .
> > We now propose "Theology Space" as an independent
> > spacetime. Theology Space is also called (human)
> > "SUBJECTIVE Spacetime" whereas Astrophysics
> > spacetime is referred to as "OBJECTIVE space-time".
> > .
> > OBJECTIVE spacetime is measured by clocks and rulers.
> > SUBJECTIVE spacetime is what people actually SEE.
> > .
> > Different people see different things – especially if they are
> > over, versus under, 20 years of age. Children see a much
> > LARGER and FASTER world than adults do.
> > .
> > In fact, we have to multiply what CHILDREN SEE by a
> > "magnification factor", a=a(t), so that their metric of
> > SUBJECTIVE spacetime is actually:-
> > .
> > ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
> > .
> > Or again, written as a matrix:-
> > .
> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
> > |o o a² o. |
> > |ooo-1/a²|
> > .
> > Here we see that multiplication by "a" increases the SIZE
> > of objects for very young people, and dividing the time by
> > "a" increases the SPEED of objects (less time=more speed).
> > .
> > Now I have called this the "METRIC OF GOD" – why is that?
> > .
> > And the answer is this – a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth, since an
> > adult is about 3.5 times as big as a newborn. Likewise, the
> > "perceptual speed" of an adult is likewise known to be 3.5
> > times as fast as that of a child (by actual measurement of
> > the movie "motion picture fusion frequency"), first discovered
> > and measured by Thomas Edison over 100 years ago.
> > .
> > Obviously both these size and speed measurements simply
> > depends on the person's location on the human growth curve: –
> > HUMAN GROWTH CURVE: -
> > https://html.scribdassets.com/38jup9thxc6bjcfe/images/8-99f9190673.jpg
> > .
> > But why am I calling it "God"? And the answer to that is this –
> > .........NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH.
> > In fact WHO and UNESCO data indicate that the average adult
> > in the world population is only about 85% fully grown –
> > some more, some less. In 3rd world countries growth stunting
> > of 30 and 40% is not uncommon ! And 1/1.85=1.18. IOW the
> > average adult in the world is SEEING a world that appears
> > .
> > ================================================
> > .......18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it actually is !
> > ================================================
> > .
> > And this, I'm here to tell you, is the scientific explanation of GOD.
> > .
> > Imagine if the world suddenly got 20% larger and 20% faster than
> > it actually is !
> > .
> > This would literally SCARE THE DAYLIGHTS out of people!
> > .
> > WELL GUESS WHAT – that is what has actually happened to every
> > single person on earth, and this phenomenon is called GOD.
> > .
> > Okay, so I've explained what I think God is – and obviously the
> > phenomenon exists – but how can I actually PROVE that it is GOD?
> > .
> > And for that we need a "60-sec Lecture on Psychometry"
> > .
> > End "60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE"
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > BEGIN the "60-sec PSYCHOMETRY LECTURE"
> >
> > =======================================
> > HERE WE GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING of my
> > 40 years of research, which ultimately led to the
> > SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG).... Back to
> > the year 1982.
> > =======================================
> > .
> > I never knew anything about GOD, was never interested in
> > GOD, and never in my life even thought about it !
> > .
> > But in 1982, as a result of driving a cab in Boston, I became
> > interested in "Human Personality Structure".
> > ... Despite having an advanced degree in PHYSICS -- I totally
> > gave up looking for a job Physics and I actually launched into
> > a 20 year, INDEPENDENT, investigation of PSYCHOMETRY !
> > .
> > PSYCHOMETRY is the statistical branch of Psychology concerned
> > mainly with written tests to determine both IQ and Personality.
> > In many ways it is considered the FLAGSHIP of modern Psychology
> > .
> > IQ (intelligence) testing is very old, while Personality testing has been
> > very active for the past 75 years. The Scientific Proof of God (SPOG)
> > centers around Personality testing in the search for the "long-lost"
> > STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY which has been underway
> > ever since HIPPOCRATES The Father of Medicine said he thought
> > there was such a thing 2500 years ago. He said Man had 4 personalities
> > caused by 4 Humoral fluids. Turns out he was right about the "4" but he
> > was wrong about the fluids !
> > .
> > With the advent of the desktop computer around 1970, Academic
> > Psychometry spread worldwide with Psychology researchers writing
> > Personality Tests and analyzing them with desktop computers. The
> > peer–published literature in this field is now so large it would
> > ENTIRELY FILL A MAJOR LIBRARY!.
> > .
> > Computers are used to extract the EIGENVECTORS from the
> > personality test data (correlation matrices). And it is believed that this
> > multilevel eigenvector structure – is in fact the "long-lost"
> > HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY.
> > .
> > To sum up all this history – it is now believed that there is an
> > EIGENVECTOR PYRAMID in the data with about 30 diverse
> > eigenvectors (also referred to as "FACTORS" by psychologists)
> > at the 1st level (called 1st-order Factors), and about 13-2nd order
> > Factors, 4-3rd Order Factors and finally ONE TOP EIGENVECTOR
> > referred to as the "GFP" (Gen. factor of Personality, or
> > Gen. factor of Psychology, if it includes IQ).
> > .
> > THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE NO IDEA WHERE these EIGENVECTOR
> > FACTORS come from in the brain ! But they are SURE they exist in
> > the DATA !
> > .
> > ========================================================
> > ALL THEY KNOW-- is that a worldwide PHD ARMY of psychometrists
> > using desktop computers in 20 countries, in 20 languages, costing
> > $100s of millions of dollars, and taking more than 50 YEARS-- has
> > produced this ENORMOUS well-documented peer-published RESULT.
> > ========================================================
> > .
> > AND THAT'S WHEN GEORGE HAMMOND ARRIVED ON THE SCENE
> > .
> > BEING A PHYSICIST, it wasn't more than a few years before I realized
> > that the long-lost Structural Model of Personality was probably caused
> > by the same underlying fact that causes all animals to have FOUR FEET !
> > Namely the CARTESIAN STRUCTURE OF SPACE
> > .
> > I observed THAT THE BRAIN IS CUBICALLY CLEAVED, and I drew this
> > picture of it with my own hand:--
> > .
> > https://html.scribdassets.com/76h12hhjls6bm5q2/images/2-7f6a975f24.jpg
> > ........... ABOVE & BELOW (HAMMOND)--- CUBIC BRAIN
> > https://html.scribdassets.com/6inure6mww8ngndu/images/2-67a3b11050.png
> > .
> > Not only is the brain cubically cleaved, I showed in a 1994 peer-reviewed
> > paper that Prof. Jeffrey A Gray's well-known SHS (Septo-Hippocampal System)
> > actually controls his 2 of the cubic-diagonal Personality Eigenvectors. And
> > more recently I've concluded that Gray's SHS actually mediates ALL-13 of the
> > 2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors-- and THAT ACTUALLY CONSTITUTES the
> > LONG-LOST HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY!
> > .
> > These 13 (cubic) 2nd order eigenvector "Personality Types", I have concluded
> > are none other than the fabled "12 Olympian Gods" of antiquity !
> > .
> > And this brings us to the well known 4-3rd Order eigenvectors, and it is easy
> > to identify them as the LEGENDARY 4 Gospel personalities:-- Mt, Mk, Lk and Jn.
> > .
> > That leaves us facing the now WIDELY TOUTED single 4th-order eigenvector
> > mentioned above; the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology).
> > .... And having determined that the 2nd Orders are the "gods" And the 3rd Orders
> > are the 4 gospel Saints:-- it is not hard to conclude that
> > .............. The GFP IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE !!
> > .
> > ===================================================================
> > THUS WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> > we have discovered that the GOD METRIC mentioned in the "Theology Lecture"
> > above, is now actually experimentally proven to be "God" !
> > ===================================================================
> > .
> > Okay Athel, I'll wrap it up here since this post is getting too long !
> > .
> > You come from Cornwall which is a peninsula in the Southwest of England.
> > I come from a peninsula in the eastern part of Massachusetts USA named
> > Cape Cod.
> > Although you are a Chemist and I am a Physicist we are both SCIENTISTS.
> > .
> > You of course have had a stellar scientific career, and have a familiarity
> > with the elite intellectuals of Oxford University where you graduated.
> > I on the other hand, it appears, am a middle-class nobody who has
> > ACCIDENTALLY made what appears to be a STELLAR HISTORIC
> > scientific discovery.
> > .
> > I hope that you will not remain blind to the importance of our accidental
> > meeting on sci.physics.relativity and will undertake to consider this
> > accidental meeting PORTENTOUSLY SERIOUS !
> > .
> > Regards, George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts
> >
> >
> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> PS:----
> I should mention that my credentials in "Psychometry"
> should be bolstered by this photo of me with the then
> world's leading expert in Psychometry Hans Eysenck
> taken at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
> in Montréal in 1996 where we were both invited speakers
> at the same podium and to the same audience. (photo
> taken by Prof. Peter F Merenda Chairman of the
> Psychology department at URI).
> .
> https://html.scribdassets.com/icjqusczk4alsap/images/1-c1c01b1d46.jpg
> .
> .... And also, I personally explain in this 10 minute
> YouTube video the relevant findings of the field of
> Psychometry to the Scientific Proof of God.
> .
> WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> .........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
> ................(YouTube 12-min)
> .
> George

Your mistake is :................(YouTube 12-min)

I mean, it should not be there. It's a turn off. In a tiktock world the
view is less than a minute. dropoff view even less than that.

Don't even put one minute.


I mean, who do you know that can listen to you talk for 12 minutes????
YOU GO OUT OF YOUR FUCKIN MIND!!!!


How about a Devil metric? kids Love it!

Fuck God! Nobody gives a fuck about God. Only stupid people believe in
God.


...and they don't even read the bible!













-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#870373

ibid.


On 2/25/2023 2:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, February 24, 2023 at 5:08:11 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
>>> On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [ Athel Cornish-Bowden] wrote
>>>> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist,
>>>>
>>>>
>>> [George Hammond MS Physics]
>>> OK Athel- let me give you a 60-sec
>>> lecture on Relativity - and then
>>> you will be a "Relativity Physicist" !
>>> .
>>> As an Oxford Chemistry PhD you know
>>> the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM --
>>> .
>>> s² = x²+y²+z² (Pythagorean Theorem in 3D)
>>> .
>>> Which can be written as a 3x3 matrix:-
>>> .
>>> | 1 o o |
>>> | o 1 o | = Pythagorean theorem
>>> | o o 1 |
>>> .
>>> Relativity is ALL ABOUT the Pythagorean Theorem
>>> IN 4D where it's called the Einstein Metric-
>>> .
>>> ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt² (Einstein metric)
>>> .
>>> Nevermind the minus sign, it's caused by subtracting
>>> the time it takes light to get from one event to another.
>>> .
>>> This eqn can be written as a 4x4 MATRIX - called the
>>> (world famous) "Einstein metric" -
>>> .
>>> | 1 o o o. |
>>> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
>>> | o o 1 o. |
>>> | o o o -1.|
>>> .
>>> OK – Einstein used this metric to deduce his
>>> Gravitational Field Equations which replaced
>>> Newton's simple inverse square law of Gravity.
>>> .
>>> But then a Russian mathematician named Friedmann
>>> proposed that the universe was EXPANDING
>>> and he told Einstein that he could simply
>>> multiply the spatial part of his metric by an
>>> "expansion factor" a=a(t) - and Einstein agreed:
>>> .
>>> ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²)-dt² (Friedmann metric)
>>> .
>>> Or written as a matrix :-
>>> .
>>> |a² o o o. |
>>> |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
>>> |o o a² o. |
>>> |o o o..-1.|
>>> .
>>> Today this metric is called the FLRW metric
>>> (Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) metric
>>> and rules all of Astrophysics !
>>> .
>>> .......END 60-sec RELATIVITY LECTURE
>>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>> .....BEGIN 60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE
>>> .
>>> We want to be as competent as the Jewish Physicists
>>> since they not only know PHYSICS, they also know
>>> what GOD is; since the Jews wrote the Bible !
>>> .... I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant" by birth and I
>>> expect you are probably a Wesleyan Methodist
>>> since most Cornish people are.
>>> .
>>> We now propose "Theology Space" as an independent
>>> spacetime. Theology Space is also called (human)
>>> "SUBJECTIVE Spacetime" whereas Astrophysics
>>> spacetime is referred to as "OBJECTIVE space-time".
>>> .
>>> OBJECTIVE spacetime is measured by clocks and rulers.
>>> SUBJECTIVE spacetime is what people actually SEE.
>>> .
>>> Different people see different things – especially if they are
>>> over, versus under, 20 years of age. Children see a much
>>> LARGER and FASTER world than adults do.
>>> .
>>> In fact, we have to multiply what CHILDREN SEE by a
>>> "magnification factor", a=a(t), so that their metric of
>>> SUBJECTIVE spacetime is actually:-
>>> .
>>> ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
>>> .
>>> Or again, written as a matrix:-
>>> .
>>> |a² o o o. |
>>> |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
>>> |o o a² o. |
>>> |ooo-1/a²|
>>> .
>>> Here we see that multiplication by "a" increases the SIZE
>>> of objects for very young people, and dividing the time by
>>> "a" increases the SPEED of objects (less time=more speed).
>>> .
>>> Now I have called this the "METRIC OF GOD" – why is that?
>>> .
>>> And the answer is this – a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth, since an
>>> adult is about 3.5 times as big as a newborn. Likewise, the
>>> "perceptual speed" of an adult is likewise known to be 3.5
>>> times as fast as that of a child (by actual measurement of
>>> the movie "motion picture fusion frequency"), first discovered
>>> and measured by Thomas Edison over 100 years ago.
>>> .
>>> Obviously both these size and speed measurements simply
>>> depends on the person's location on the human growth curve: –
>>> HUMAN GROWTH CURVE: -
>>> https://html.scribdassets.com/38jup9thxc6bjcfe/images/8-99f9190673.jpg
>>> .
>>> But why am I calling it "God"? And the answer to that is this –
>>> .........NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH.
>>> In fact WHO and UNESCO data indicate that the average adult
>>> in the world population is only about 85% fully grown –
>>> some more, some less. In 3rd world countries growth stunting
>>> of 30 and 40% is not uncommon ! And 1/1.85=1.18. IOW the
>>> average adult in the world is SEEING a world that appears
>>> .
>>> ================================================
>>> .......18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it actually is !
>>> ================================================
>>> .
>>> And this, I'm here to tell you, is the scientific explanation of GOD.
>>> .
>>> Imagine if the world suddenly got 20% larger and 20% faster than
>>> it actually is !
>>> .
>>> This would literally SCARE THE DAYLIGHTS out of people!
>>> .
>>> WELL GUESS WHAT – that is what has actually happened to every
>>> single person on earth, and this phenomenon is called GOD.
>>> .
>>> Okay, so I've explained what I think God is – and obviously the
>>> phenomenon exists – but how can I actually PROVE that it is GOD?
>>> .
>>> And for that we need a "60-sec Lecture on Psychometry"
>>> .
>>> End "60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE"
>>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>> BEGIN the "60-sec PSYCHOMETRY LECTURE"
>>>
>>> =======================================
>>> HERE WE GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING of my
>>> 40 years of research, which ultimately led to the
>>> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG).... Back to
>>> the year 1982.
>>> =======================================
>>> .
>>> I never knew anything about GOD, was never interested in
>>> GOD, and never in my life even thought about it !
>>> .
>>> But in 1982, as a result of driving a cab in Boston, I became
>>> interested in "Human Personality Structure".
>>> ... Despite having an advanced degree in PHYSICS -- I totally
>>> gave up looking for a job Physics and I actually launched into
>>> a 20 year, INDEPENDENT, investigation of PSYCHOMETRY !
>>> .
>>> PSYCHOMETRY is the statistical branch of Psychology concerned
>>> mainly with written tests to determine both IQ and Personality.
>>> In many ways it is considered the FLAGSHIP of modern Psychology
>>> .
>>> IQ (intelligence) testing is very old, while Personality testing has been
>>> very active for the past 75 years. The Scientific Proof of God (SPOG)
>>> centers around Personality testing in the search for the "long-lost"
>>> STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY which has been underway
>>> ever since HIPPOCRATES The Father of Medicine said he thought
>>> there was such a thing 2500 years ago. He said Man had 4 personalities
>>> caused by 4 Humoral fluids. Turns out he was right about the "4" but he
>>> was wrong about the fluids !
>>> .
>>> With the advent of the desktop computer around 1970, Academic
>>> Psychometry spread worldwide with Psychology researchers writing
>>> Personality Tests and analyzing them with desktop computers. The
>>> peer–published literature in this field is now so large it would
>>> ENTIRELY FILL A MAJOR LIBRARY!.
>>> .
>>> Computers are used to extract the EIGENVECTORS from the
>>> personality test data (correlation matrices). And it is believed that this
>>> multilevel eigenvector structure – is in fact the "long-lost"
>>> HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY.
>>> .
>>> To sum up all this history – it is now believed that there is an
>>> EIGENVECTOR PYRAMID in the data with about 30 diverse
>>> eigenvectors (also referred to as "FACTORS" by psychologists)
>>> at the 1st level (called 1st-order Factors), and about 13-2nd order
>>> Factors, 4-3rd Order Factors and finally ONE TOP EIGENVECTOR
>>> referred to as the "GFP" (Gen. factor of Personality, or
>>> Gen. factor of Psychology, if it includes IQ).
>>> .
>>> THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE NO IDEA WHERE these EIGENVECTOR
>>> FACTORS come from in the brain ! But they are SURE they exist in
>>> the DATA !
>>> .
>>> ========================================================
>>> ALL THEY KNOW-- is that a worldwide PHD ARMY of psychometrists
>>> using desktop computers in 20 countries, in 20 languages, costing
>>> $100s of millions of dollars, and taking more than 50 YEARS-- has
>>> produced this ENORMOUS well-documented peer-published RESULT.
>>> ========================================================
>>> .
>>> AND THAT'S WHEN GEORGE HAMMOND ARRIVED ON THE SCENE
>>> .
>>> BEING A PHYSICIST, it wasn't more than a few years before I realized
>>> that the long-lost Structural Model of Personality was probably caused
>>> by the same underlying fact that causes all animals to have FOUR FEET !
>>> Namely the CARTESIAN STRUCTURE OF SPACE
>>> .
>>> I observed THAT THE BRAIN IS CUBICALLY CLEAVED, and I drew this
>>> picture of it with my own hand:--
>>> .
>>> https://html.scribdassets.com/76h12hhjls6bm5q2/images/2-7f6a975f24.jpg
>>> ........... ABOVE & BELOW (HAMMOND)--- CUBIC BRAIN
>>> https://html.scribdassets.com/6inure6mww8ngndu/images/2-67a3b11050.png
>>> .
>>> Not only is the brain cubically cleaved, I showed in a 1994 peer-reviewed
>>> paper that Prof. Jeffrey A Gray's well-known SHS (Septo-Hippocampal System)
>>> actually controls his 2 of the cubic-diagonal Personality Eigenvectors. And
>>> more recently I've concluded that Gray's SHS actually mediates ALL-13 of the
>>> 2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors-- and THAT ACTUALLY CONSTITUTES the
>>> LONG-LOST HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY!
>>> .
>>> These 13 (cubic) 2nd order eigenvector "Personality Types", I have concluded
>>> are none other than the fabled "12 Olympian Gods" of antiquity !
>>> .
>>> And this brings us to the well known 4-3rd Order eigenvectors, and it is easy
>>> to identify them as the LEGENDARY 4 Gospel personalities:-- Mt, Mk, Lk and Jn.
>>> .
>>> That leaves us facing the now WIDELY TOUTED single 4th-order eigenvector
>>> mentioned above; the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology).
>>> .... And having determined that the 2nd Orders are the "gods" And the 3rd Orders
>>> are the 4 gospel Saints:-- it is not hard to conclude that
>>> .............. The GFP IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE !!
>>> .
>>> ===================================================================
>>> THUS WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
>>> we have discovered that the GOD METRIC mentioned in the "Theology Lecture"
>>> above, is now actually experimentally proven to be "God" !
>>> ===================================================================
>>> .
>>> Okay Athel, I'll wrap it up here since this post is getting too long !
>>> .
>>> You come from Cornwall which is a peninsula in the Southwest of England.
>>> I come from a peninsula in the eastern part of Massachusetts USA named
>>> Cape Cod.
>>> Although you are a Chemist and I am a Physicist we are both SCIENTISTS.
>>> .
>>> You of course have had a stellar scientific career, and have a familiarity
>>> with the elite intellectuals of Oxford University where you graduated.
>>> I on the other hand, it appears, am a middle-class nobody who has
>>> ACCIDENTALLY made what appears to be a STELLAR HISTORIC
>>> scientific discovery.
>>> .
>>> I hope that you will not remain blind to the importance of our accidental
>>> meeting on sci.physics.relativity and will undertake to consider this
>>> accidental meeting PORTENTOUSLY SERIOUS !
>>> .
>>> Regards, George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts
>>>
>>>
>> [George Hammond MS Physics]
>> PS:----
>> I should mention that my credentials in "Psychometry"
>> should be bolstered by this photo of me with the then
>> world's leading expert in Psychometry Hans Eysenck
>> taken at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
>> in Montréal in 1996 where we were both invited speakers
>> at the same podium and to the same audience. (photo
>> taken by Prof. Peter F Merenda Chairman of the
>> Psychology department at URI).
>> .
>> https://html.scribdassets.com/icjqusczk4alsap/images/1-c1c01b1d46.jpg
>> .
>> .... And also, I personally explain in this 10 minute
>> YouTube video the relevant findings of the field of
>> Psychometry to the Scientific Proof of God.
>> .
>> WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
>> .........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
>> ................(YouTube 12-min)
>> .
>> George
> 
> Your mistake is :................(YouTube 12-min)
> 
> I mean, it should not be there. It's a turn off. In a tiktock world the
> view is less than a minute. dropoff view even less than that.
> 
> Don't even put one minute.
> 
> 
> I mean, who do you know that can listen to you talk for 12 minutes????
> YOU GO OUT OF YOUR FUCKIN MIND!!!!
> 
> 
> How about a Devil metric? kids Love it!
> 
> Fuck God! Nobody gives a fuck about God. Only stupid people believe in
> God.
> 
> 
> ...and they don't even read the bible!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#870624

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 4:54:07 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> >
> < [Jeffrey Rubard] wrote:
> > "I guess you guys sure like any kind of sophistry."
> >
> >
> [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> Hi Jeffrey – welcome to SPR – good luck with
> trying to get anyone's attention !  Everyone is
> too busy trying to prove EINSTEIN WRONG !
> .
> "SOPHISTRY" ? – – Forget it –
> PLAIN STUPIDITY is the PROBLEM !
> .
> This is the simplest
> SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF GOD
> ever discovered – and they can't understand it!
> .
> PS – Google may "trim" the following and replace it
> with a series of dots "[...]" – if so, just CLICK on the
> "..." dots ,  and it will re-appear !
> .
> [George E. Hammond MS Physics]
> .
> The Einstein metric is written:
> ...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
> or a matrix:
> .
> | 1 o o o. |
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> | o o 1 o. |
> | o o o -1.|
> .
> But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK"
> and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER"
> .
> Slow and short by the same
> multiplication factor "a"
> .
> A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
> A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
> .
> So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
> ...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
> or as a matrix: –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ?
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> .
> And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20
> are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" !
> .
> The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure.
> An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot!
> .
> Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is
> likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was
> first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago.
> ...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed
> 16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20,
> just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as
> evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided
> by age under 20 to obtain IQ!
> .
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
> using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER !
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> .
> And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH,
> in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world
> population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) ,
> we see that the average adult person in the world is: –
> .
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER
> THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON
> ......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD"
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> .
> For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
> RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
> AND
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ
> 
> QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD !
> (Someone tell Richard Dawkins)
> .
> George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA


Let me explain something to you...

Mathematical Proof of God means...there is no proof of God because you are using math to prove it and math does not exist.

There is no physical proof of God, only numbers on a matchbook cover.

The 'scientific community' whenever they don't have physical proof...they conjure up mathematical proof.


Like for example "dark energy". No physical proof that it exist but lots of mathematical proof.

Math is not science...math doesn't even exist!


So, of course you have mathematical proof of God since math and God don't exist.


Can you prove math exist? Where does it exist?...only in the Mind. 


Billions of earth-like planets out there...Where is the second one? Doesn't exist. It's only a math trick.











-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#870632

On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 12:56:52 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote: 
> > 
> > On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 4:54:07 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: 
> > > 
> > < [Jeffrey Rubard] wrote: 
> > > "I guess you guys sure like any kind of sophistry."
> > > 
> > > 
> > [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> > Hi Jeffrey – welcome to SPR – good luck with 
> > trying to get anyone's attention ! Everyone is 
> > too busy trying to prove EINSTEIN WRONG ! 
> > . 
> > "SOPHISTRY" ? – – Forget it – 
> > PLAIN STUPIDITY is the PROBLEM ! 
> > . 
> > This is the simplest 
> > SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF GOD 
> > ever discovered – and they can't understand it! 
> > . 
> > PS – Google may "trim" the following and replace it 
> > with a series of dots "[...]" – if so, just CLICK on the 
> > "..." dots , and it will re-appear ! 
> > . 
> > [George E. Hammond MS Physics] 
> > . 
> > The Einstein metric is written: 
> > ...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt² 
> > or a matrix:
> > . 
> > | 1 o o o. | 
> > | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC 
> > | o o 1 o. | 
> > | o o o -1.| 
> > .
> > But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK" 
> > and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER" 
> > . 
> > Slow and short by the same 
> > multiplication factor "a" 
> > . 
> > A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds" 
> > A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches" 
> > . 
> > So now the Einstein metric becomes: – 
> > ...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a² 
> > or as a matrix: –
> > . 
> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC 
> > |o o a² o. | 
> > |ooo-1/a²| 
> > . 
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> > BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ? 
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> > . 
> > And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20 
> > are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" ! 
> > . 
> > The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure. 
> > An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot! 
> > . 
> > Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is 
> > likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was 
> > first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago. 
> > ...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed 
> > 16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20, 
> > just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as 
> > evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided 
> > by age under 20 to obtain IQ! 
> > . 
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> > So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer" 
> > using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER ! 
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> > . 
> > And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH, 
> > in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world 
> > population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) , 
> > we see that the average adult person in the world is: – 
> > . 
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> > SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER 
> > THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON 
> > ......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD" 
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> > . 
> > For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: – 
> > RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD 
> > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ 
> > AND 
> > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ 
> > 
> > QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD ! 
> > (Someone tell Richard Dawkins) 
> > . 
> > George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA 
> 
> 
> Let me explain something to you... 
> 
> Mathematical Proof of God means...there is no proof of God because you are using math to prove it and math does not exist. 
> 
> There is no physical proof of God, only numbers on a matchbook cover. 
> 
> The 'scientific community' whenever they don't have physical proof...they conjure up mathematical proof. 
> 
> 
> Like for example "dark energy". No physical proof that it exist but lots of mathematical proof. 
> 
> Math is not science...math doesn't even exist! 
> 
> 
> So, of course you have mathematical proof of God since math and God don't exist. 
> 
> 
> Can you prove math exist? Where does it exist?...only in the Mind. 
> 

"You're a mathematical intuitionist, are you?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#870655

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 3:56:49 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 4:54:07 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > > >
> > > < [Jeffrey Rubard] wrote:
> > > > "I guess you guys sure like any kind of sophistry."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> > > Hi Jeffrey – welcome to SPR – good luck with
> > > trying to get anyone's attention ! Everyone is
> > > too busy trying to prove EINSTEIN WRONG !
> > > .
> > > "SOPHISTRY" ? – – Forget it –
> > > PLAIN STUPIDITY is the PROBLEM !
> > > .
> > > This is the simplest
> > > SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF GOD
> > > ever discovered – and they can't understand it!
> > > .
> > > PS – Google may "trim" the following and replace it
> > > with a series of dots "[...]" – if so, just CLICK on the
> > > "..." dots , and it will re-appear !
> > > .
> > > [George E. Hammond MS Physics]
> > > .
> > > The Einstein metric is written:
> > > ...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
> > > or a matrix:
> > > .
> > > | 1 o o o. |
> > > | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> > > | o o 1 o. |
> > > | o o o -1.|
> > > .
> > > But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK"
> > > and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER"
> > > .
> > > Slow and short by the same
> > > multiplication factor "a"
> > > .
> > > A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
> > > A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
> > > .
> > > So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
> > > ...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
> > > or as a matrix: –
> > > .
> > > |a² o o o. |
> > > |o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
> > > |o o a² o. |
> > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > .
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ?
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > .
> > > And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20
> > > are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" !
> > > .
> > > The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure.
> > > An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot!
> > > .
> > > Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is
> > > likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was
> > > first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago.
> > > ...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed
> > > 16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20,
> > > just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as
> > > evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided
> > > by age under 20 to obtain IQ!
> > > .
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
> > > using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER !
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > .
> > > And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH,
> > > in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world
> > > population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) ,
> > > we see that the average adult person in the world is: –
> > > .
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER
> > > THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON
> > > ......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD"
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > .
> > > For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
> > > RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD
> > > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
> > > AND
> > > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ
> > >
> > > QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD !
> > > (Someone tell Richard Dawkins)
> > > .
> > > George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA
> >
> > [STARMAKER] wrote:
> > Let me explain something to you...
> >
> >
> [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> Let me tell you something
> STARMAKER: –
> .
> I studied the problem 8 hours a day
> 7 days a week for 40 years. (I'm 81) !
> .
> The minimum wage in Massachusetts
> is $15 per hour.
> .
> 40*365*8*15 = $1.75 MILLION DOLLARS
> .
> That's what it cost ME to discover the
> World's 1st Scientific Proof Of God (SPOG)
> .
> But that's nothing compared to $500 million
> it cost ACADEMIC RESEARCH PSYCHOLOGY
> over 50 years worldwide to Discover the "GFP"
> (Gen. factor of Psychology) which is in fact
> (Hammond has proved) THE GOD OF THE BIBLE.
> They don't know what it is, – but Hammond does !
> .
> That's not a "math" result – it's an "EXPERIMENTAL l"
> result ! By thousands of research scientists worldwide!
> sitting in a peer reviewed literature large enough to
> fill a 10 story library !
> .
> As a physicist, I have simply expressed their
> EXPERIMENTAL RESULT in mathematical terms: –
> (because I'm a Relativity Physicist).
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> And because of their MONUMENTAL EXPERIMENTAL
> RESULT – you can be goddamned sure that it is
> EXPERIMENTALLY CORRECT!
> .
> THERE IS NOW A RIGOROUS SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> .
> (Someone should tell Richard Dawkins,
> Or Bill Dembski, for that matter!)
> .
> George


I looked up Bill Dembski at the Encyclopedia...(he sounds like you)

http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2010/11/103-william-bill-dembski.html

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#870705

Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 11:12:45 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 3:56:49 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > George Hammond wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 4:54:07 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > < [Jeffrey Rubard] wrote:
> > > > > > "I guess you guys sure like any kind of sophistry."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> > > > > Hi Jeffrey – welcome to SPR – good luck with
> > > > > trying to get anyone's attention ! Everyone is
> > > > > too busy trying to prove EINSTEIN WRONG !
> > > > > .
> > > > > "SOPHISTRY" ? – – Forget it –
> > > > > PLAIN STUPIDITY is the PROBLEM !
> > > > > .
> > > > > This is the simplest
> > > > > SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF GOD
> > > > > ever discovered – and they can't understand it!
> > > > > .
> > > > > PS – Google may "trim" the following and replace it
> > > > > with a series of dots "[...]" – if so, just CLICK on the
> > > > > "..." dots , and it will re-appear !
> > > > > .
> > > > > [George E. Hammond MS Physics]
> > > > > .
> > > > > The Einstein metric is written:
> > > > > ...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
> > > > > or a matrix:
> > > > > .
> > > > > | 1 o o o. |
> > > > > | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> > > > > | o o 1 o. |
> > > > > | o o o -1.|
> > > > > .
> > > > > But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK"
> > > > > and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER"
> > > > > .
> > > > > Slow and short by the same
> > > > > multiplication factor "a"
> > > > > .
> > > > > A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
> > > > > A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
> > > > > .
> > > > > So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
> > > > > ...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
> > > > > or as a matrix: –
> > > > > .
> > > > > |a² o o o. |
> > > > > |o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
> > > > > |o o a² o. |
> > > > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > > > .
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ?
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > .
> > > > > And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20
> > > > > are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" !
> > > > > .
> > > > > The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure.
> > > > > An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot!
> > > > > .
> > > > > Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is
> > > > > likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was
> > > > > first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago.
> > > > > ...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed
> > > > > 16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20,
> > > > > just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as
> > > > > evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided
> > > > > by age under 20 to obtain IQ!
> > > > > .
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
> > > > > using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER !
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > .
> > > > > And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH,
> > > > > in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world
> > > > > population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) ,
> > > > > we see that the average adult person in the world is: –
> > > > > .
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER
> > > > > THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON
> > > > > ......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD"
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > .
> > > > > For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
> > > > > RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
> > > > > AND
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ
> > > > >
> > > > > QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD !
> > > > > (Someone tell Richard Dawkins)
> > > > > .
> > > > > George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA
> > > >
> > > > [STARMAKER] wrote:
> > > > Let me explain something to you...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> > > Let me tell you something
> > > STARMAKER: –
> > > .
> > > I studied the problem 8 hours a day
> > > 7 days a week for 40 years. (I'm 81) !
> > > .
> > > The minimum wage in Massachusetts
> > > is $15 per hour.
> > > .
> > > 40*365*8*15 = $1.75 MILLION DOLLARS
> > > .
> > > That's what it cost ME to discover the
> > > World's 1st Scientific Proof Of God (SPOG)
> > > .
> > > But that's nothing compared to $500 million
> > > it cost ACADEMIC RESEARCH PSYCHOLOGY
> > > over 50 years worldwide to Discover the "GFP"
> > > (Gen. factor of Psychology) which is in fact
> > > (Hammond has proved) THE GOD OF THE BIBLE.
> > > They don't know what it is, – but Hammond does !
> > > .
> > > That's not a "math" result – it's an "EXPERIMENTAL l"
> > > result ! By thousands of research scientists worldwide!
> > > sitting in a peer reviewed literature large enough to
> > > fill a 10 story library !
> > > .
> > > As a physicist, I have simply expressed their
> > > EXPERIMENTAL RESULT in mathematical terms: –
> > > (because I'm a Relativity Physicist).
> > > .
> > > |a² o o o. |
> > > |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > > |o o a² o. |
> > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > .
> > > And because of their MONUMENTAL EXPERIMENTAL
> > > RESULT – you can be goddamned sure that it is
> > > EXPERIMENTALLY CORRECT!
> > > .
> > > THERE IS NOW A RIGOROUS SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> > > .
> > > (Someone should tell Richard Dawkins,
> > > Or Bill Dembski, for that matter!)
> > > .
> > > George
> > I looked up Bill Dembski at the Encyclopedia...(he sounds like you)
> >
> > http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2010/11/103-william-bill-dembski.html
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
> 
> "This is a well-known ruse, right?"

"ruse"???? Where is the ruse? What part is the ruse??


This is called...the real world.


The real world is a ...ruse.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#870731

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 2:12:45 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
> > > > > using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER !
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > .
> > > .
> > [STARMAKER] wrote:
> > I looked up Bill Dembski at the Encyclopedia...(he sounds like you)
> >
> > http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2010/11/103-william-bill-dembski.html
> > --
> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> .
> Bill Dembski is a lot more educated than me.
> He has 2 or 3 PhD's – one in Mathematics !
> .
> Yet he has been ridiculed and trashed on the
> Media a million times more than me !
> .
> BUT – – WOULD YOU BELIEVE: –
> .
> IT TURNS OUT THAT MY "GOD METRIC": –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> Actually PROVES that Dembski's
> .
> INTELLIGENT DESIGN theory
> .
> is SCIENTIFICALLY CORRECT !
> .
> If anybody reading this is in a position to
> personally contact BILL DEMBSKI, please
> let him know that a rigorous scientific proof
> of "Intelligent Design" has been found
> ACCIDENTALLY by a Massachusetts physicist
> named HAMMOND !
> .
> George

Why don't you simply call him up yourself? Everybody gots a phone in their pocket!

and. btw..did anybody tell you Richard Dawkins wrote a book entitled...THE GOD DELUSION!!!!!






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#870749

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 3:10:32 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > George Hammond wrote:
> > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
> > > > using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER !
> > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > IT TURNS OUT THAT MY "GOD METRIC": –
> > > |a² o o o. |
> > > |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > > |o o a² o. |
> > > |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> (( IS a "SLOW CLOCK-SHORT RULER" – METRIC ))
> .
> and:
> > > Actually PROVES that Dembski's
> > > INTELLIGENT DESIGN theory
> > > is SCIENTIFICALLY CORRECT !
> > > .
> > > If anybody  is in a position to
> > > contact BILL DEMBSKI, please
> > > let him know
> >
> > [STARMAKER] wrote:
> > Why don't you simply call him up yourself?
> > Everybody's got a phone in their pocket!
> >
> > and. btw..did anybody tell you Richard Dawkins
> > wrote a book entitled...THE GOD DELUSION!!!!!
> >
> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> Dembski gets 500 emails, 50 phone calls
> and 150 letters EVERY DAY !
> .
> ARE YOU KIDDING – the only way to get a
> message to him is through someone who
> KNOWS HIM PERSONALLY !
> .
> Besides that, Hammond's SPOG proves
> Dembski's ID – – but Dembski's ID cannot
> prove Hammond's SPOG!
> .
> RICHARD DAWKINS' "God Delusion" is 15 yrs old !!
> .
> Bill Dembski is 20 years younger than me
> Richard Dawkins is my age (81)!
> .
> 50 years ago, when I was 30 – I did not
> believe there was a God.  Today at 80
> I know better – in fact I've proven there IS !.
> .
> How Richard Dawkins being a highly educated
> and worldly person could get to the age of 65 and
>  write a book proposing Atheism – is beyond belief ?
> .
> George
> 
> 

Richard Dawkins never said he was an atheist.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#870834

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 1:58:31 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > George Hammond wrote:
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
> > > using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER !
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > IT TURNS OUT THAT MY "GOD METRIC": –
> > > |a² o o o. |
> > > |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > > |o o a² o. |
> > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > .
> > > (( IS a "SLOW CLOCK-SHORT RULER" – METRIC ))
> > > .
> > [STARMAKER] wrote:
> > Richard Dawkins never said he was an atheist.
> >
> >
> [George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .
> RICHARD DAWKINS said in print: –
> .
> "A supernatural creator almost certainly does
> not exist and religious faith is a delusion—
> "a fixed false belief"" (Wikipedia)

A person like Richard Dawkins chooses his words very carefully.

Notice there is the word "almost" before certaintly.



 al·most
/'ôlmost/
adverb
not quite;
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+almost


That means he said 'not quite certaint'...does not exist.

'not quite'.  ALMOST!





> .
> He says: “ He only believes Scientific Evidence
> and there is no scientific evidence for God !

“Absence of Evidence does not mean Evidence of Absence”, an old quote by Dr Carl Sagan, means, in a very simple term,that, if 
there is lack of evidence of presence of a thing, does not always conclude to the absence of that thing totally.



Learn grasshopper.


Maybe you need a video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfk7tW429E4










> .
> So – Dawkins is an Atheist !
> .
> HOWEVER: – UNBEKNOWNST TO DAWKINS
> .
> HAMMOND has in fact discovered the world's first
> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG) proven conclusively
> by overwhelming SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE and in fact
> has been measured to 2 decimal point accuracy !!
> .
> THEREFORE by his own definition: – –
> .
> RICHARD DAWKINS IS NO LONGER AN ATHEIST !
> .
> .
> UNFORTUNATELY, Richard Dawkins is so famous and
> so old and feeble at this point, that it is impossible to
> even NOTIFY him of the discovery – much less
> talk to him !
> .
> So in the end, recognition of Hammond's SPOG will more
> likely come from people like Bill Dembski who is only 62
> years old, and other scientists his age !
> .
> George

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#871473

George Hammond wrote:

> (ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²) = GOD METRIC .
> or written as a matrix: –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | = (slow clock/short
> ruler metric)
> |ooo-1/a²|

you gay?? that's a matrix, not a tensor. You don't even know how to treat 
tensors.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#871490

George Hammond wrote:

> Now let's get to the POINT – here is a facsimile of an email letter I
> wrote to P rof. Jeffrey F .Cohn at Carnegie Mellon University, where
> they have actually electronically produced a picture of GOD: –

that mostly can be an *_idol_*, not a God. You guys from america are 
totally confused. No country in the world trusts america. Especially your 
*_"allies"_*. They know you are *_liars_and_terrorists_*. Liars in 
*_moon_landing_*, liars in Iraq, liars in Afghanistan, liars in Libya, 
liars in Syria *_stealing_they_oil_as_we_speak_*, liars in pandemic and 
*_vaccines_*, liars supporting the nazis of the *_illegal_uKraine_*. You 
are fucked up everywhere on this planet, america.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#871504

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 12:50:03 PM UTC-4, Carmine Benedetti wrote:
> > that's a matrix, not a tensor. You don't even know how to treat
> > tensors.
> >
> [Geo. Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA]
> March 19, 2023
> .
> Dear Carmine Benedetti: –
> Listen you Mafia fathead, you don't know any
> scientific mathematics – a 2nd rank tensor
> can be written as a MATRIX and at the 2nd rank
> tensor multiplication is simply matrix multiplication!
> No Einstein index summation needed!
> .
> Now let's get to the POINT – here is a facsimile
> of an email letter I wrote to P rof. Jeffrey F .Cohn
> at Carnegie Mellon University, where they have
> actually electronically produced a picture of
> GOD: –
> .
> [Geo. Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA]
> March 19, 2023
> .
> Dear Prof Jeffrey F. Cohn
> Carnegie Mellon University
> Pittsburghv PA
> ,
> NOTE: – if this message is "trimmed" by Google
> Groups simply click on the 3 dots "[...]" and it will
> REAPPEAR
> .
> YOU ARE ABOUT TO SEE THE WORLD'S FIRST PICTURE OF GOD
> .
> [George E Hammond MS Physics, Cape Cod MA USA]
> .
> DISCOVERY OF DIRECT EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE
> CONFIRMING HAMMOND's GOD METRIC: –
> .
> (ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²) = GOD METRIC
> .
> or written as a matrix: –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. | = (slow clock/short ruler metric)
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> TAKE A LOOK AT THIS PICTURE: –
> .
> https://html.scribdassets.com/12zrv4vq804i11gb/images/2-354f9efd5e.jpg
> .
> The 4 faces across the TOP are real unaltered
> video pictures.
> .
> The 4 faces across the BOTTOM are AVATAR
> creations in which the 4 real faces have had
> there facial expression mathematically "DAMPED"
> or "ATTENUATED" by 50% (eigenvector) magnitude--
> electronically in real time!
> (A highly advanced mathematical procedure BTW)
> .
> NOW I AM HERE TO TELL YOU that this
> mathematical and electronic MIRACLE,
> which is reported in this this stunning paper in
> the world's most prestigious scientific journal –
> PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS
> OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY for 2009: –
> .
> ......... http://goo.gl/QM7IuE
> .
> Is a direct PICTURE of what happens to reality
> if you INCREASE "a" (the scale factor) in
> Hammond's GOD METRIC: –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. | = (slow clock/short ruler metric)
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> YOU CAN SEE WITH YOUR OWN EYES – –
> THAT THIS IS THE METRIC OF GOD !!
> .
> George
> .
> George


What???? dis looks like 'deepfake' techniques from the year 2009!

https://www.iainm.com/publications/Boker2009-Effectsa/image.png
http://www.iainm.com/publications/Boker2009-Effectsa/image.jpg

http://www.iainm.com/publications.html
https://www.iainm.com/publications/Boker2009-Effectsa/paper.pdf






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web