Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #868060 > unrolled thread

Re: The primordial atom that exploded out of nowhere, 13.5 billion years ago.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: The primordial atom that exploded out of nowhere, 13.5 billion years ago. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 11:33 -0800

#868060 — Re: The primordial atom that exploded out of nowhere, 13.5 billion years ago.

Richard Hertz wrote:
> 
> It's difficult, for a rational person, to accept the theory of the Big Bang.
> 
> Suddenly, and following E = mc2, nearly 18 × 10^68 Joules of pure energy
> were released from a single dot that went off.
> 
> With time, more than  10^25 stars, averaging the mass of the Sun, appeared and clustered in galaxies within the observable universe.
> 
> How is it possible that such theory gained ground and evolved into the modern
> cosmology, where such stars form less than 5% of the baryonic mass and
> 95% of DARK STUFF had to be created to sustain the narrative derived from GR?
> 
> Sick people, psychopaths, satanists spitting at the face of God, dangerous
> people. That's what relativists, cosmologist and particle physics parasites
> are. They should be eradicated from the face of the Earth. All of them.


"...eradicated from the face of the Earth. All of them."


All seven million of them!


Let's start with the smartest people on top of the potem pole...


make sure they don't reproduce anymore of these genetic defects.


i just want dumb blonds on the earth.


Don't forget, the first woman on earth was a dumb blond.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web