Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #866715 > unrolled thread

Re: climate change

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2022-12-22 19:03 -0800
Last post2023-01-09 11:02 -0800
Articles 6 on this page of 26 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-22 19:03 -0800
    Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 19:11 -0800
      Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-23 11:10 -0800
        Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-23 15:30 -0800
          Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:12 -0800
            Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-28 12:24 -0800
              Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-31 09:33 +0100
          Re: climate change Doodnath Sarti <ttha@dnhnahan.nh> - 2023-01-01 08:49 +0000
            Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 06:21 -0600
              Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 11:17 -0800
              Re: climate change Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-08 13:47 +0000
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-09 08:53 +0100
                  Re: climate change Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 08:30 +0000
                    Re: climate change Y A <angel0000000010000000000000@gmail.com> - 2023-01-09 02:21 -0800
                    Re: climate change Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 18:58 +0000
                    Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-09 22:18 -0800
                    Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-10 07:18 +0100
                    Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 22:32 -0800
                    Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 11:17 -0800
                    Re: climate change Kobie Locatelli <be@cliietik.oo> - 2023-01-15 11:38 +0000
                    Re: climate change Kobie Locatelli <be@cliietik.oo> - 2023-01-15 13:23 +0000
                      Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 13:14 -0600
                      Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-15 14:34 -0800
                        Re: climate change Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-15 14:59 -0800
                      Re: climate change Edurardo De felice <eduu@eiudece.co> - 2023-01-17 13:49 +0000
      Re: climate change Y A <angel0000000001000000000000@mail.ee> - 2023-01-09 11:02 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#868221

FromKobie Locatelli <be@cliietik.oo>
Date2023-01-15 13:23 +0000
Message-ID<tq0upc$2btsp$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#867891
Volney wrote:

>> consequently, the lengths of an hour, minute and second are also based
>> on the positions of the star, indirectly of course.
> 
> Nope. A second is 9192631770 times the period of a certain Cs frequency
> as measured locally. A minute is 60 seconds, an hour is 60 minutes.

not in my country. In my country a hour is 100 minutes and a minute is 100
seconds. Whereas a second is 1000 milliseconds, respectively.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#868244

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2023-01-15 13:14 -0600
Message-ID<k2j1laFh0ooU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#868221
On 1/15/2023 7:23 AM, Kobie Locatelli wrote:
> Volney wrote:
> 
>>> consequently, the lengths of an hour, minute and second are also based
>>> on the positions of the star, indirectly of course.
>>
>> Nope. A second is 9192631770 times the period of a certain Cs frequency
>> as measured locally. A minute is 60 seconds, an hour is 60 minutes.
> 
> not in my country. In my country a hour is 100 minutes and a minute is 100
> seconds. Whereas a second is 1000 milliseconds, respectively.

Yet the hourly rate of pay remains the same where communism and
capitalism conspire.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#868253

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2023-01-15 14:34 -0800
Message-ID<e16c2bd7-4070-4e94-b5ec-f40525b89c63n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#868221
On Sunday, January 15, 2023 at 5:24:01 AM UTC-8, Kobie Locatelli wrote:
> Volney wrote: 
> 
> >> consequently, the lengths of an hour, minute and second are also based 
> >> on the positions of the star, indirectly of course. 
> > 
> > Nope. A second is 9192631770 times the period of a certain Cs frequency 
> > as measured locally. A minute is 60 seconds, an hour is 60 minutes.
> not in my country. In my country a hour is 100 minutes and a minute is 100 
> seconds. Whereas a second is 1000 milliseconds, respectively.

According to a Google search...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time#:~:text=Decimal%20hours%20are%20frequently%20used,convert%20between%20minutes%20and%20hours.

... France is the only country to officially use Decimal Time, starting in about 1794... but it was abandoned only 17 months later... so I would like to know what counrtry you are talking about that uses it today.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#868274

FromJim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date2023-01-15 14:59 -0800
Message-ID<o3de9j-uisv.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to#868253
Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, January 15, 2023 at 5:24:01 AM UTC-8, Kobie Locatelli wrote:
>> Volney wrote: 
>> 
>> >> consequently, the lengths of an hour, minute and second are also based 
>> >> on the positions of the star, indirectly of course. 
>> > 
>> > Nope. A second is 9192631770 times the period of a certain Cs frequency 
>> > as measured locally. A minute is 60 seconds, an hour is 60 minutes.
>> not in my country. In my country a hour is 100 minutes and a minute is 100 
>> seconds. Whereas a second is 1000 milliseconds, respectively.
> 
> According to a Google search...
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time#:~:text=Decimal%20hours%20are%20frequently%20used,convert%20between%20minutes%20and%20hours.
> 
> ... France is the only country to officially use Decimal Time, starting in about 1794... but it was abandoned only 17 months later... so I would like to know what counrtry you are talking about that uses it today.


Elbonia

https://dilbert.fandom.com/wiki/Elbonia

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#868312

FromEdurardo De felice <eduu@eiudece.co>
Date2023-01-17 13:49 +0000
Message-ID<tq6922$38lue$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#868221
J. J. Lodder wrote:
> Kobie Locatelli <be@cliietik.oo> wrote:
>> Volney wrote:
>> > Nope. A second is 9192631770 times the period of a certain Cs
>> > frequency as measured locally. A minute is 60 seconds, an hour is 60
>> > minutes.
>> 
>> not in my country. In my country a hour is 100 minutes and a minute is
>> 100 seconds. Whereas a second is 1000 milliseconds, respectively.
> 
> Off with your head!!

you stoopid hackable animal. I do your mother in she ass, rapidly. No
questions about it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#867926

FromY A <angel0000000001000000000000@mail.ee>
Date2023-01-09 11:02 -0800
Message-ID<1077b86b-e923-49e8-9991-dd6c54efc008n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#866716
Look this
↓
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🌞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 🛩
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀🌧️🌧️🌧️⠀⠀🌧️🌧️⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🌧️🌧️🌧️⠀⠀🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️⠀⠀🌧️🌧️⠀⠀⠀🌧️🌧️🌧️⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🕊️ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀🌴⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🍄 ⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🌼⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🌻
🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫

How do You rate this on 1....10 scale ?


pnal...@gmail.com kirjutas Reede, 23. detsember 2022 kl 05:11:41 UTC+2:
> On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 7:03:21 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > 
> > > On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:26:02 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote 
> > > 
> > > > In California, they'll have warm weather tomorrow... gang wars, and some very overpriced real estate. 
> > > 
> > > Real estate is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. There is no such thing as overpriced real estate... 
> > 
> > 
> > https://www.rockethomes.com/blog/home-buying/3-signs-home-overpriced
> Yeah... so...? I stand by my claim... if someone is willing to meet your asking price, it is not overpriced. 
> 
> Pretty obvious, right?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web