Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #867931 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-01-09 19:26 +0000 |
| Last post | 2023-02-07 15:25 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 43 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 19:26 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 23:01 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 23:36 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-09 21:01 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 12:56 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 13:11 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 14:41 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 22:31 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 22:36 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 00:23 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 22:42 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 00:17 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 09:55 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 12:15 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Otto Fiscella <tfit@tiselelc.it> - 2023-01-13 16:41 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 12:47 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Ciro Di pietro <pide@rioied.ao> - 2023-01-20 00:02 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 21:20 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Ciro Di pietro <pide@rioied.ao> - 2023-01-20 23:30 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> - 2023-01-21 14:47 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> - 2023-01-22 01:35 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> - 2023-01-22 22:21 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Faustino Biondo <uinn@bfotboia.nt> - 2023-01-25 17:03 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Faustino Biondo <uinn@bfotboia.nt> - 2023-01-25 17:21 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Alexander Basso <axsd@daoadnbl.ba> - 2023-02-02 00:58 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Alexander Basso <axsd@daoadnbl.ba> - 2023-02-02 20:25 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-03 21:58 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Estaban Alduino <tosd@teabnnai.ou> - 2023-02-06 23:20 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-07 01:39 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 04:43 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-11 00:03 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-08 10:57 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-08 12:46 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 21:25 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Walton Esposito <nsoi@ipstoonl.ns> - 2023-02-12 02:14 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 21:50 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Walton Esposito <nsoi@ipstoonl.ns> - 2023-02-11 19:12 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-13 23:05 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Northstream 2 and 1 <sdfasf@sdfgdg.sd> - 2023-02-16 04:04 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-13 23:14 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 23:14 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Rusbel Confortola <fnbo@orfolcec.tl> - 2023-02-07 21:10 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 15:25 -0600
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-09 19:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <tphpom$94tf$2@dont-email.me> |
George Hammond wrote: > [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶] > I have finally concluded that Hammond's . > SCIENTIFIC P̶R̶O̶O̶F̶ O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶ . > Should be most properly a̶p̶p̶e̶a̶r̶ i̶n̶ a̶ p̶e̶e̶r̶ r̶e̶v̶i̶e̶w̶e̶d̶ : > OPEN ACCESS MEGA JOURNAL such as: > "S̶C̶I̶E̶N̶T̶I̶F̶I̶C̶ R̶E̶P̶O̶R̶T̶S̶" > or "PLOS-1" (P̶u̶b̶l̶i̶c̶ L̶i̶b̶r̶a̶r̶y̶ o̶f̶ S̶c̶i̶e̶n̶c̶e̶) speaking the witch, can you do something for /_slava_uKraine_/?? */_No_one_has_done_enough_for_Ukraine_–_FM__/* https://www.rt.com/russia/569611-ukraine-aid-not-enough/ Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba has urged Kiev’s “partners” to continue funneling military aid into the country, claiming that “no one has done enough” to help the nation yet. “*/_Translation_from_Ukrainian_/*: We have squandered our army again, give us more armies, and we will continue to pretend that we are fighting Russia on our own. And don’t forget to sponsor our oligarchs’ luxurious life in Europe!” he wrote.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-09 23:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tpi6ck$94tf$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #867931 |
George Hammond wrote: > [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶] > . > |à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽² ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. | > |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽² ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. | = Ṫ̸̡̤̉̐̽H̴͎͎̦͒͑̕͠ͅE̸͙͖͕͐̔ H̴͎͎̦͒͑̕͠ͅA̸͕̘̻̠͎͍̾̄̉̈́̐͐̚͝ͅM̴̡̺̀͗͐͒̃ͅM̴̡̺̀͗͐͒̃ͅƠ̷̙̠͇͇̼̯̖̦̌̑̊͗N̵͎̞͙̳̘͕̭̏͋̇̏̈́͘͝͝D̴̜̖̹̹̖̩̗͈̔͆͗͊̾̽͝ M̴̡̺̀͗͐͒̃ͅE̸͙͖͕͐̔Ṫ̸̡̤̉̐̽R̷̠͕̼̀́͌I̴̡̛̲͙͖̭͑͛͐C̵̨̨͓͇̹͖͙̘͐̓̆͜͠ Ơ̷̙̠͇͇̼̯̖̦̌̑̊͗F̷̨̻̃͛̑͑̅́̓͒ G̸̩̪̳͆̏Ơ̷̙̠͇͇̼̯̖̦̌̑̊͗D̴̜̖̹̹̖̩̗͈̔͆͗͊̾̽͝ |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽² ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. | > |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ -1/à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽²| WEF Declare Humans *_Who_Wish_To_Live_* Must Become Batteries For AI https://newspunch.com/wef-declare-humans-who-wish-to-live-must-become-batteries-for-ai/ Vladimir Putin on Deathbed; Orders Military To Prepare for World War 3 https://newspunch.com/vladimir-putin-on-deathbed-orders-military-to-prepare-for-world-war-3/ Asked when he thinks Putin’s death will come, Budanov said that he thought it would be very soon. ‘I think very fast. I hope.’
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-09 23:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tpi8eo$94tf$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #867931 |
George Hammond wrote: > [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶] > . > |à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽² ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. | > |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽² ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. | = Ṫ̶̸̡̤̉̐̽H̶̴͎͎̦͒͑̕͠ͅE̶̸͙͖͕͐̔ H̶̴͎͎̦͒͑̕͠ͅA̶̸͕̘̻̠͎͍̾̄̉̈́̐͐̚͝ͅM̶̴̡̺̀͗͐͒̃ͅM̶̴̡̺̀͗͐͒̃ͅƠ̶̷̙̠͇͇̼̯̖̦̌̑̊͗N̶̵͎̞͙̳̘͕̭̏͋̇̏̈́͘͝͝D̶̴̜̖̹̹̖̩̗͈̔͆͗͊̾̽͝ M̶̴̡̺̀͗͐͒̃ͅE̶̸͙͖͕͐̔Ṫ̶̸̡̤̉̐̽R̶̷̠͕̼̀́͌I̶̴̡̛̲͙͖̭͑͛͐C̶̵̨̨͓͇̹͖͙̘͐̓̆͜͠ Ơ̶̷̙̠͇͇̼̯̖̦̌̑̊͗F̶̷̨̻̃͛̑͑̅́̓͒ G̶̸̩̪̳͆̏Ơ̶̷̙̠͇͇̼̯̖̦̌̑̊͗D̶̴̜̖̹̹̖̩̗͈̔͆͗͊̾̽͝ > |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽² ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. | > |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ -1/à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽²| these khazars pretend they are jewish. claiming to be rabbi at wailing wall asking for money for shabbath 1-8-23 https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/SPDjXm212Rac
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-09 21:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63BCF11D.1CD5@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #867931 |
This gave me a headache: https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:obFJRtZV7UcJ:scholar.google.com/+GEORGE+E+HAMMOND+&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 it doesn't make any fuckin sense to me! It's like it was written by a thousand monkies from 20 different countries...and wop! George Hammond wrote: > > On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 2:26:16 PM UTC-5, Luigi Tumicelli wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > > > > [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶] > > > I have finally concluded that Hammond's . > > > SCIENTIFIC P̶R̶O̶O̶F̶ O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶ . > > > Should be most properly a̶p̶p̶e̶a̶r̶ i̶n̶ a̶ p̶e̶e̶r̶ r̶e̶v̶i̶e̶w̶e̶d̶ : > > > OPEN ACCESS MEGA JOURNAL such as: > . > [George E Hammond MS Physics] > SNIP ALIAS > SNIP BOT > SNIP SPAM > . > [George E Hammond MS physics] > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |o o o -1/a²| > . > ..Notice that this IS for a "lengthening ruler" and a "speeding up" > clock. IOW people under 20 years of age are growing 5% > per year. Which means their SIZE and perceptual SPEED > is increasing 5% per year – and this causes the subjective world > (subjective Universe) to APPEAR TO SHRINK and SLOW DOWN > 5% per year! And this gives us the "GOD METRIC" shown above! > The validity of this is cofirmed by the famous FLRW (Friedmann) > Metric which is of a s SIMILAR form and controls the expansion of > hte (real) "oibjective" Universe in Astrophysics > . > THERE ARE A NUMBER OF MEGA-JOURNAL'S and all of > them have a huge stable of excellent Professorial rank > reviewer's on call to be able to review it. > . > Elementa (@elementascience), from BioONE > FEBS Open Bio (@FEBSOpenBio), from Elsevier > F1000 Research (@F1000Research), from Faculty of 1000 > G3 (@geneticsGSA), from the Genetics Society of America > GigaScience (@GigaScience), from BGI > Biology Open (@BiologyOpen), from the Company of Biologists > BMJ Open (@BMJ_Open), from BMJ Publishing Group > Cureus (@CureusInc) > IEEE Access, from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics > PeerJ (@thePeerJ) > PLOS ONE (@PLOSONE), from the Public Library of Science > QScience Connect, from QScience > SAGE Open, from SAGE > Scientific Reports (@SciReports), from Nature Publishing > The Scientific World Journal, from Hindawi > SpringerPlus (@SpringerPlus), from Springer > . > THE APC CHARGES range from $1,000 to $3,000 USD > ... I have located a couple of reviewer's for PLOS ONE > who appear to have adequate academic education > (in Physics and Psychometry) to be able to reliablyreview my SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD. > . > FURTHERMORE – these mega-Journal's offer UNLIMITED > SPACE for text and DIAGRAMS, ILLUSTRATIONS, > REFERENCES, etc. etc. etc. And they utilize GOOGLE to > search the mega-Journal's publications periodically and copy. > and forward (worldwide) any paper of interest to their > subscribers and mail it directly to their email inbox. > .... This produces a massive worldwide circulation of your > mega-Journal paper to thousands of scientists worldwide. > Thus the impact is greater than even publication of the paper > in the world's most prestigious journal ! > . > ANYONE WHO HAS ANY comments about these > mega-Journal's – or recommendations, please post it here ! > . > . George -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-10 12:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63BDD10C.2626@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #867972 |
i don't understand why you call it The Scientific Proof of God, when in reality it should be called The Scientific Proof of Everything!!!! Why don't you entitled it: The Theory of Everything is no longer a theory! THE SCIENTIFIC PROOF of EVERYTHING has finally been discovered!!!! Discovered by the Top Number One Physicists in the WORLD, Richie Hammond!!!! am i right, or am i right? George Hammond wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:01:08 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > This gave me a headache: > > https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:obFJRtZV7UcJ:scholar.google.com/+GEORGE+E+HAMMOND+&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 > > > [George E Hammond MS physics] > ... Hi STARMAKER... That 1996 paper which is the > LAST PAPER listed on my website: – > . > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond > . > Was written 27 years ago when I was ONLY 53 YEARS OLD ! > . > Do you know what kind of f'n energy I had in those days for > chrissakes – I'm now 80 and still moving like a bat outa hell > on a bicycle. > . > I'm goddamned glad I wrote it – because I've decided that > I'm going to publish the SPOG in a MEGA-JOURNAL > where you have practically UNLIMITED SPACE and > UNLIMITED illustrations, diagrams, references, blah blah > blah – and GOOGLE scans these papers and sends copies > all of them to the email inbox of any of their subscribers > who have an interest in the subjects. This increases > TARGETED PUBLICATION to an immense degree – > and above and beyond that – they are OBLIVIOUS to the > SIGNIFICANCE of their papers and only interested in > the SCIENTIFIC RIGOR of the paper – so I don't have to > worry about POLITICS with one of these impersonal > mega-journals !. > . > I'll probably go with PLOS ONE but I may go with > SCIENTIFIC REPORTS – depends on whether they have > a heavyweight enough reviewer to understand the > goddamned thing? > . > It will cost me a couple of grand for the APC charges in > one of these mega-journals – but I don't give a shit – > the real problem is that it will take me 6 months or longer > to WRITE the goddamned thing – and the clock is running > out on me – so I'm gonna have to work around the clock > for 6 months or longer to do it ! > . > MEANWHILE – I noticed this guy "Luigi" talking about the > Jews again – and the point is – that the discovery of the > world's first SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD – which is this > right here: – > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = SCIENCE METRIC OF GOD > |o o a o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > . > Marks the end of the age of Anti-Semitism – because now > it is not the Jews – but "SCIENCE" that holds the > "Keys to the Kingdom of God" – and the sooner I can get this > thing published – the better ! > . > George -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-10 13:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f4ac1d1f-47a1-43ef-a176-d9191312a0f2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #868013 |
Stop and HALT the boiling of live lobsters and live crabs On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:56:40 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > i don't understand why you call it The Scientific Proof Because all animals have feelings, are sentient beings and we must not torture them... Be humane to wild animals, do not torture them in death by boiling them while alive. Sure no-one cares to see spam from FBI, CIA, Mi6, police drag net garbage that floods sci.math and sci.physics everyday. I have kindly asked President Biden to kindly remove this drag net spam from all of sci.math and sci.physics and leave them as spam free zones. > > > > //////// > |:---[.] > |( _J > | ^ ( _| > / \_____) > / _____ \ > | / \ . > | | | > \ /\ /\__ > | | \/--- > \ \ )________________\\ \\\ > | >_____/_____)============ > \__________/ ============== > / \ -----------------------------// /// > | | ~~ > \ \\ > \ |\ > \ | \ > \ | | > | | | > | | | > | / | > |________/____| > (_________)____) >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-10 14:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63BDE991.26AB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #868014 |
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Stop and HALT the boiling of live lobsters and live crabs > > On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:56:40 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > i don't understand why you call it The Scientific Proof > > Because all animals have feelings, are sentient beings and we must not torture them... Animals don't have feelings like people do. Animals don't have a consciousness like people do. Otherwise all animals would have the same percentage of being right handed as people and left handed. > > Be humane to wild animals, do not torture them in death by boiling them while alive. Sure no-one cares to see spam from FBI, CIA, Mi6, police drag net garbage that floods sci.math and sci.physics everyday. I have kindly asked President Biden to kindly remove this drag net spam from all of sci.math and sci.physics and leave them as spam free zones. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-10 22:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63BE57AB.5B30@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #868015 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > > > Stop and HALT the boiling of live lobsters and live crabs > > > > On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:56:40 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > i don't understand why you call it The Scientific Proof > > > > Because all animals have feelings, are sentient beings and we must not torture them... > > Animals don't have feelings like people do. Animals don't have a consciousness like people do. Otherwise all animals would have the same percentage of being right handed as people and left handed. Now, I know yous are thinking the question... "What does being being right handed or left handed have anything to do with..having consciousness????" If you don't know the answer to that question... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-10 22:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <321df252-4f7a-4112-bea8-920a90f9e809n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #868014 |
Save whales, sure no-one cares to save spam from FBI, CIA, Mi6, police drag net garbage that floods sci.math and sci.physics everyday. I have kindly asked President Biden to kindly remove this drag net spam from all of sci.math and sci.physics and leave them as spam free zones. Our Whale Animals Can a Trump tariff fine, Like the tariff of a Macron French wine, Show us how crazy is the world sign, When you have a crazy USA president time, Who pines about his hair line, More than he cares about 1,500 whales slaughtered by Japan crime. b . $ . .... d * * $ . .ze$$$$$$$$be.. ^b ^L 4F $ $ e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$e "L $ b $ J% .$$$$$$$$$$$$$P**""** 3r'L $ $ 4F "*$$$$$$$$*" *.$ 3 $ $ *$$$$$" ^$'r'$P d" ^$$$" ^$$ $F4F $$$ "$r*bP $$$F "4$" $$$$ ^" $$$$b ..eeeed$$$$$$$$eeee... *$$$$b. .ze$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$be.. '$$$$$$bee..e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$bc 3$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$c "*$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$r ^""""$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$e.. P "$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$bee.z@" ^*$$$$$$$$*""" """"**$$$$$$$$$$$$$" ^"*$$$" ""*$$$$$$*" ""**eeec............eee@**"" Gilo94' """""""""""""" z$ z$$F d$$$ $$$$$ J$$$$$ $$$$$$ .$$$$$$ $$$$$$$b $$$$$$$$$c J$$$$$$$$$$$c $$$$ "$$$$$$$$$. $$$$P "*$$$$$" .ze$$$$$bc .$$$$F z$$$$$$$$$$$$$b $$$$$ .e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. $$$$$ z$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$""$$$$ 4$$$$$F .$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$r $$$$$$$ z$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$c e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ '$$$$$$$c .d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$b d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ *$$$$$$$$r d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Gilo94' .-------------'```'----......,,__ _, | `'`'`'`'-.,.__ .'( | `'--._.' ) | `'-.< \ .-'`'-. -. `\ \ -.o_. _ _,-'`\ | ``````''--.._.-=-._ .' \ _,,--'` `-._( (^^^^^^^^`___ '-. | \ __,,,...--' ` ````````` `'--..___\ |` jgs `-.,' Newsgroups: sci.physics and sci.math Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 07:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: why we especially need whales to exist //SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, series 2, 2019 From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium...@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 14:32:55 +0000 why the whales are so important for the oceans-- isomers of CO2 //SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, series 2, 2019 Chemistry of carbon dioxide in Old Chemistry thought that CO2 from fossil fuel burning is the same CO2 that animals and plants breathe in and breathe out. Old Chemistry is wrong, for the CO2 that living organisms need to stay alive is a different isomer (the bonding of carbon with two oxygen atoms have different geometries) from the CO2 that is produced through burning. The fossil fuel CO2 is a toxic poison to plants and animals. So the best CO2 source in the oceans is the large animals. If you remove animals from ocean, and remove enough of them, you kill off the plants of the ocean also. This idea applies on land also. The plants of terrestrial life, need their large animals for Animal-CO2. AP Cranial-rectally inverted. Eric Francis, George Witte, St. Martin's Press Depriving a village somewhere, of an idiot. jfderry , JF Derry Telanthropus brains plugged into Africanthropus body James Kibo Parry James Kibo Parry James Kibo Parry On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 2:27:06 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >"..as smart as the average tunicate" why Jason Herrmann and Dartmouth College (Hanover High School math is brighter than the College math) physics departments has lights turned off, but Harvard's Dr.Hau needs to turn the light off-- Quantum Entanglement verified 1- Kibo Parry Moroney, is it your opinion that Dr. John Baez is a math jackarse that cannot tell the difference from a ellipse and oval as proven by AP (see proofs below) ?? And when confronted with the fact that the ellipse is only a cylinder cut, not a conic cut, the imbecile Baez tries to go out and redefine the ellipse-- I mean, Baez spends more time in making up fake names for himself than actually getting a paper cone and putting a Kerr lid into the cone and see for himself that it is a oval Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 00:28:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <421c6f56-7355-4ec6...@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.208.232.34; posting-account=jPnQ2goAAAA461y3QD0lbyw0oKeThma1 NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.208.232.34 Message-ID: <69d8bde6-bcb6-472f...@googlegroups.com> Subject: asshole From: noTthaTguY <abu.ku...@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:28:33 +0000 On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 3:28:35 AM UTC-5, noTthaTguY wrote: > ellipses are ovals, but not all ovals are elipses, of course; > just grab a dictionary, asshole > On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 7:17:05 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Agreed. > So, kibo Parry Moroney, you agree, but which is worse a idiot like you who thinks 938 is 12% short of 945 which even Dr. John Baez would Agree is wrong. why Jason Herrmann and Dartmouth College (Hanover High School math is brighter than the College math) physics departments has lights turned off, but Harvard's Dr.Hau needs to turn the light off-- Quantum Entanglement verified 1- Kibo Parry Moroney, is it your opinion that Ken Ribet is a math jackarse that cannot tell the difference from a ellipse and oval as proven by AP (see proofs below) ?? On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 7:17:05 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Agreed. > 1-AMS, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, Robert L. Bryant, David Vogan, Eric M. Friedlander, they all love money more than the truth of math and science-- ellipse is never a conic section why Jason Herrmann and Dartmouth College (Hanover High School math is brighter than the College math) physics departments has lights turned off, but Harvard's Dr.Hau needs to turn the light off-- Quantum Entanglement verified I mean think of it, down the street from Dartmouth College is Hanover High School and anyone of the many bright students at Hanover High School can take a Euclid plane geometry proof that the ellipse is never a conic but is the oval, and walk into a Dartmouth College math classroom where the nitwit math professor is teaching the conic slant cut is a ellipse, when it never was. Yet here the Hanover High School student has more brains in math than the nitwit Dartmouth College math professor. #21 Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Quantum Entanglement was shown on NOVA in January 2019 with Austrian physicists at a mountain telescope gathering data. NOVA tried to explain Quantum Entanglement, but the below probably does a better job of explaining. Especially explaining to High School students what is going on, and why. A much easier and nicer experiment proving Quantum Entanglement and explaining why it exists; the mechanism behind it; is Harvard's Dr. Hau slow light experiments, once the laser light is turned off. Cover Picture is my photo of a Google search of terms "slow light BEC". Length: 21 pages ,_ o / //\, \>>| \\, #55 Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago along with Mediterranean Sea//geology series book 3 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Earth's axis tilt of 23 degrees came late in life for planet Earth some 66 million years ago when a asteroid bolide hit Earth, that caused not only the dinosaur extinction but carved out the Mediterranean Sea and moved the Europe Asian Laurasia supercontinent of Pangaea in plate tectonics. We have overwhelming proof of this axis tilt from 0 degrees to 23 degrees only in K-T boundary, for we have evidence that all the continents had living plants and animals which just could not be if the 23degree tilt had existed from Cambrian to Cretaceous. Australia alone since it was at the South Pole for much of its life yet still abundant in fossils that could only live in a warm climate. Cover picture of me circa 1993, pointing at the Mediterranean Sea of Europe. Length: 55 pages 1 customer review Top Reviews Jason Herrmann 1.0 out of 5 starsWaste of money and brain cells November 16, 2019 A complete and utter load of BS. Helpful Comment Report abuse See all 1 customer reviews Write a customer review Half a bubble off plumb. Has a one-way ticket on the Disoriented Express. Has an IQ one lower than it takes to grunt. Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek Divides 3 into 7, and gets a even whole number. jfderry , JF Derry Has his solar panels aimed at the moon. Has it floored in neutral. Has only one chopstick in the chowmein. Has signs on both ears saying "Space for Rent." Has the attention span of an overripe grapefruit. Has the mental agility of a soap dish. Hasn't got all his china in the cupboard. He writes blank checks on a closed account. kibo James Parry kibo James Parry kibo James Parry He's really into himself. His head is up his arse. He's so dense, light bends around him. His phone doesn't quite reach his desk. Eric Francis, George Witte, St. Martin's Press His wipers don't touch the glass. High relative humidity. He's lost in a fog. His antenna doesn't pick up all the channels. Earle Jones Earle Jones Earle Jones Earle Jones His brain was sold separately and they were out of stock. His elevator is stuck between floors. His golf bag does not contain a full set of irons. His jack can't get the car off the ground. His head whistles in a cross wind. His mind is on vacation but his mouth is working overtime. I don't know what you are talking about, honestly. It must be frustrating to be sure you are right and so completely unable to say how or why. You pinhead think if you find it in wikipedia it must be true. Duhr. I suggest you do some research. It's hard to believe you are this dumb. Pay attention. Science is about reality, not imagination. What you describe here has more to do with stamp collecting than it does science. It's great how the anonymity of the internet allows fools the freedom to express the depths of their foolishness. Present your proof, dumbarse. Where is this extensive experimental data? Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? Do you think they are hiding it from us? Why would they do that? Did I characterize your argument accurately? ,_ o / //\, \>>| \\, I have to ask which Jason Herrman is this? For there is one at Penn Univ in anthropology, archaeology dept. One in Stanford as physics student. Or, another Jason Herrmann?? And why so many people see the Internet not as a place to learn and grow, but a place to dis people. What is this modern day hate spew with the Internet?? Do some people get their "rocks off" by dissing other people and their work? __| \ / |__ _ o ___\o \o | o/ o/___ o _ /\ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ /\ ___|_\______ _____/_|__ Kibo Parry Moroney, is it your opinion that Dr. Terence Tao is a math basketcase that cannot tell the difference from a ellipse and oval as proven by AP starting 2016, ellipse is a cylinder cut, never a conic (see proofs below) ?? On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 7:17:05 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Agreed. > King of Science --AP--what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 4 First an aside for this is in the probability and statistics of Junior year College #5 HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 5 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV. Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles. Length: 16 pages List of Topics that is Fake Math or Irrelevant Minutiae First off, let me make a long list of what is not mathematics and was thrown out as either fakery junk mathematics or was pared down immensely for being rather minutiae or irrelevant or archaic and not worth the time in classroom education. 1) All of Old Logic such as the textbooks by Copi and Boole and Jevons with their messed up operators such as 10 OR 4 = 14, are thrown out onto the rubbish pile of shame. Set theory is thrown out completely, although we can use the word "set" to mean collection, group. All of Cantor set theory is phony baloney, not worth reading. 2) Rationals and Negative Numbers thrown out completely because the only true numbers are Decimal Grid Numbers. The Smallest set of numbers is the 10 Grid System with its infinitesimal being .1, and the entire collection of 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . , 9.9, 10.0 where .1 is microinfinity and 10 is macroinfinity. In 100 Grid the infinitesimal is .01, in 1000 Grid the infinitesimal is .001, etc etc. In such a true system of numbers, all the numbers are built by mathematical-induction. Not just one group of numbers-- counting, but all numbers from mathematical-induction. 3) Irrationals thrown out completely (ditto to Rationals and Negative numbers) 4) Reals thrown out completely (ditto) 5) Imaginary numbers and Complex numbers are b.s. and thrown out completely 6) Trigonometry pared down so much-- 90% thrown out, and no trigonometry ever enters Calculus. Only real use of trigonometry is when you have an angle and side, you can figure out the rest of the right triangle. But no, when you give true math to a gaggle of kooks, it is not long before they stretch true math way way out of its "zone of truth". And even fill up by 50% of calculus, when trig should never be in calculus. 7) Continuum and continuity thrown out as horrible fakery (in fact the Quantum Mechanic Physics of early 1900s had a better handle on the truth and reality of math with discrete space) 8) Topology is junk and a waste of time for many reasons such as continuum does not exist, and the fact that the idea of "bending" is not really ever a mathematical concept 9) Prime numbers are fakery for the Naturals never had division in the first place. The real true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers and they do not have a concept of "prime". The key evidence that primes were silly stupid error, was the fact that there never existed a "pattern for primes". And all of mathematics is a science of "pattern". If any part of mathematics has no pattern, is indication that such was a phony fake concept to start with. Below begins a write-up of Math topics all have pattern, if not, then not math. 10) Limit in Old Math was a horrible fakery, built by lowly idiots of math who wanted to get away from the smart students asking them-- stupid professor, come back here,-- how does a zero width rectangle even have interior area 11) Lobachevsky, Riemann geometries and all NonEuclidean geometries are fakery and a waste of time. Many math professors want to spice up their boring math, so they ventured way way off into the twilight-zone of math with NonEuclidean geometry, like eating the hottest peppers in the world for breakfast 12) Boole logic a horrid gaggle of monumental mistakes; one colossal error was their insane 10 OR 4 = 14. Boole was a monumental idiot of logic that he went to college to teach in a rainstorm without umbrella and when he got there, shivering, and no commonsense to switch into dry clothes, taught in rain soaked clothes then ordered his wife to give him cold bathes and wet his bed in order to fight pneumonia, and western culture puts such a logical misfit as a figurehead of logic 13) Galois Algebra of Group, Ring, Field a fakery and waste of time 14) Dimension stops at 3rd, and 3rd is the last and highest dimension possible, for there is no 4th or higher dimensions. 15) High School in Old Math spends too much time on quadratic equations with their negative numbers and imaginary-complex numbers when such never existed in the first place and where they violate a principle of algebra-- that an equation of algebra-- the right-side of the equation must always have a greater than zero number. So we throw out all quadratic equations of Old Math as fake math. 16) High School in Old Math spends too much time on teaching in geometry the congruence of SSS, ASA etc etc and we should pare that back somewhat, as excess teaching of a tiny minor concept. 17) Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations are now seen as superfluous when all functions are polynomials 18) Graph theory-- 90% worthless for it is based on the fakery of continuum 19) Probability and Statistics theory now becomes a part of Sigma Error in New Math, the Old Math Probability and Statistics theory were wastrel and thrown out for it is based on a continuum. We keep Probability and Statistics in new math but revise and overhaul it completely, especially the definition of Probability. 20) We definitely throw out all Old Math Calculus textbooks as mostly propaganda, based on the silly Limit and the Continuum 21) We throw out the Euclidean Axioms of Geometry and start anew, with axioms based on Physics as geometry truth 22) Fractal theory totally junk and a waste-- uses ill-defined infinity 23) Vector Calculus (mind you not vectors versus scalars), Chaos theory, Complex Analysis, utter junk and waste of time since polynomial theory covers all functions 24) Differential geometry, Measure theory fakery since they never had the correct numbers of math, and they had the fakery continuum 25) We throw out all the Apollonius conic sections because he misidentified the ellipse. The ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section and the oval is the slant cut of the cone, never the ellipse. We replace the entire conic sections by the AP theory of axes of symmetry using Decimal Grid Numbers for algebra and strip-wavelength-geometry axioms. This list is ongoing, and is a bulletin-board of Teaching True Mathematics for Sophomore College year. To show students what math to avoid as a total fake and waste of time. I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium AP- the King of Science #14 AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section//ellipse-oval series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone. Length: 21 pages #15 Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition// ellipse-oval series, book 2 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) In November of 2019, I was challenged into giving a well-defined definition of Oval, since Old Math Geometry never provided a well defined definition of Oval. I dutifully well defined this important class of geometry figures. And whilst completing that task of a well defined definition, I found a second proof that the ellipse is never a conic section, always a cylinder section, for it is the oval that is the conic section at a slant cut. This second proof is a mere one paragraph long and is a Projective Geometry proof that the slant cut in a cone is a oval, never the ellipse. Caution: I am worried that ascii-art is messed up and so this book is in rtf file not pdf. Cover Picture: a cone and cylinder on a cutting board ready to be cut at a slant, and ready to view in silhouette form. Length: 34 pages why does Jason Herrmann, Kibo Parry Moroney, Dan Christensen want to kill WHALES, if any?? //rating of Kindle book//Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES// Kindle Edition // Jason Herrmann, Confused as a baby in a topless bar On Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 5:04:12 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > I ate.. "..and it was delicious!" AP writes: how repulsive, when the world has the Right Whale and Blue Whale on verge of extinction. On Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 11:02:33 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote: > >There will be a price to pay. You will be relentlessly and publicly exposed for AP writes: Whales do not need any price to pay, they have a right to live on Earth far greater than Dan, ever has. And Dan is a bully that needs Canadian jail time. And Kibo Parry Moroney needs USA jail sentence. why does Jason Herrmann want to kill WHALES, if any?? //rating of Kindle book//Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES// Kindle Edition // Jason Herrmann, Confused as a baby in a topless bar why does Jason Herrmann want to kill WHALES, if any?? //rating of Kindle book//Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES// Kindle Edition Jason Herrmann, Confused as a baby in a topless bar why does Jason Herrmann want to kill WHALES, if any?? //rating of Kindle book//Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES// Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium 1 customer review Top Reviews Jason Herrmann 1.0 out of 5 starsWaste of money and brain cells November 16, 2019 A complete and utter load of BS. Helpful Comment Report abuse See all 1 customer reviews Write a customer review ,_ o / //\, \>>| \\, Newsgroups: sci.physics and sci.math Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 07:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: why we especially need whales to exist //SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, series 2, 2019 From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium...@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 14:32:55 +0000 why the whales are so important for the oceans-- isomers of CO2 //SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, series 2, 2019 Chemistry of carbon dioxide in Old Chemistry thought that CO2 from fossil fuel burning is the same CO2 that animals and plants breathe in and breathe out. Old Chemistry is wrong, for the CO2 that living organisms need to stay alive is a different isomer (the bonding of carbon with two oxygen atoms have different geometries) from the CO2 that is produced through burning. The fossil fuel CO2 is a toxic poison to plants and animals. So the best CO2 source in the oceans is the large animals. If you remove animals from ocean, and remove enough of them, you kill off the plants of the ocean also. This idea applies on land also. The plants of terrestrial life, need their large animals for Animal-CO2. #64 Science Council Ruling Earth//Paradise supernation corralling Bad Guy nations//series 2 (AP running for USA president) Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) ,_ o / //\, \>>| \\, Australopithecus brain fitted into Paranthropus body Dan Christensen, Dan Christensen Graecopithecus brain evolved from Sahelanthropus body kibo James Parry kibo James Parry kibo James Parry Ardipithecus body coupled to a Australopithecus brain Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek Lucy brain housed in a Otzi body jfderry, jf Derry, JF Derry, lunatic mind housed in a lunatic J F Derry (author) CroMagnum body enhanced by Floresiensis brain Eric Francis, George Witte, St. Martin's Press Improved Neanderthalensis brains from Heidelbergensis Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek Rusty Tavek Telanthropus brains plugged into Africanthropus body kibo James Parry kibo James Parry kibo James Parry Palaeanthropus thinking by the time of Cyphanthropus jfderry, jf Derry, JF Derry, lunatic mind housed in a lunatic J F Derry (author) Tchadanthropus mind by the time of Atlanthropus Earle Jones Earle Jones Earle Jones Kenyanthropus body propelled by a Praeanthropus mind Eric Francis, George Witte, St. Martin's Press Pithecanthropus body propelled by Sinanthropus mind __| \ / |__ _ o ___\o \o | o/ o/___ o _ /\ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ /\ ___|_\______ _____/_|__ Mass Spectrometry Comics, LTD Kibo Parry Michael Moroney's profile photo .. .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-.. , . `.' ' `. .' .' ` ` ' `.. ; . ; .' . `. ; ; . ' `. . ' . ' ` `. | . '. ' . 0 0 ' `. ' ` ; ` .' ` ; U ` ; '; ` : | ;.. :` ` : `;. ```. .-; | ' '. ` ``.., .' :' ' ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics. And Barry Shein loves to whisper in my ear how 10 OR 2 =12 with AND as subtraction ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` `. ````'''''' ' ' ` . ' ' / ` `. ' ' . / ` .. ..' .'"""""...' / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....''' / .'' ; ` .' ` ...'.' ; .' ` .' ` "" .' .' | ` .; \ ` ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ ` :' | ' ` , `. ` | ' ` ' `. ` ` ' ` ; `. | `.' ` ; `-' `...' Kibo Parry Michael Moroney wrote: Jan 7, 2020, 1:08:57 AM to Hairworm of Math and Green-banded Broodsac of Physics Steve of Science Blogs-- Science Blogs GAPS in a doctor's reasoning about vaccines and autism ... And now back to ignoring RI's weak substitute for an Archimedes Plutonium. (They just don't make cranks like they used to...) -- Steve. .Jul 31, 2011
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-11 00:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63BE7218.1B24@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #868039 |
I never seen a whale. So does it matter if they exist or not? Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Save whales, sure no-one cares to save spam from FBI, CIA, Mi6, police drag net garbage that floods sci.math and sci.physics everyday. I have kindly asked President Biden to kindly remove this drag net spam from all of sci.math and sci.physics and leave them as spam free zones. > >  >                  Our Whale Animals > > Can a Trump tariff fine, > Like the tariff of a Macron French wine, > Show us how crazy is the world sign, > When you have a crazy USA president time, > Who pines about his hair line, > More than he cares about 1,500 whales slaughtered by Japan crime. > >                b >               .  $  . >     ....       d  *  *  $   . >   .ze$$$$$$$$be..    ^b ^L 4F $   $ >  e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$e    "L $  b $  J% > .$$$$$$$$$$$$$P**""**    3r'L $ $  4F >  "*$$$$$$$$*"        *.$ 3 $  $ >   *$$$$$"          ^$'r'$P d" >   ^$$$"           ^$$ $F4F >   $$$            "$r*bP >   $$$F             "4$" >   $$$$             ^" >   $$$$b        ..eeeed$$$$$$$$eeee... >   *$$$$b.    .ze$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$be.. >   '$$$$$$bee..e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$bc >    3$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$c >    "*$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$r >     ^""""$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$e..     P >        "$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$bee.z@" >        ^*$$$$$$$$*"""   """"**$$$$$$$$$$$$$" >         ^"*$$$"         ""*$$$$$$*" >           ""**eeec............eee@**""  Gilo94' >               """""""""""""" >         z$ >        z$$F >       d$$$ >       $$$$$ >      J$$$$$ >      $$$$$$ >      .$$$$$$ >      $$$$$$$b >     $$$$$$$$$c >     J$$$$$$$$$$$c >     $$$$ "$$$$$$$$$. >    $$$$P   "*$$$$$"           .ze$$$$$bc >    .$$$$F                z$$$$$$$$$$$$$b >    $$$$$              .e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. >    $$$$$             z$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$""$$$$ >   4$$$$$F           .$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$  $$$$r >   $$$$$$$          z$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ >   $$$$$$$c         e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ >   '$$$$$$$c       .d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ >    $$$$$$$$b      d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ >    *$$$$$$$$r    d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Gilo94' > >   .-------------'```'----......,,__             _, >   |                 `'`'`'`'-.,.__     .'( >   |                        `'--._.'  ) >   |                           `'-.< >   \        .-'`'-.                -.   `\ >   \        -.o_.   _            _,-'`\   | >    ``````''--.._.-=-._   .'  \        _,,--'`    `-._( >     (^^^^^^^^`___   '-. |   \  __,,,...--'         ` >     `````````  `'--..___\   |` >         jgs      `-.,' > -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-10 22:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63BE5A5B.3D90@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #868013 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 3:56:38 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > i don't understand why you call it The Scientific Proof of God, when in > > reality it should be called The Scientific Proof of Everything!!!! > > > [George E Hammond MS Physics] > .... GOD IS A P S Y C H O L O G I C A L PHENOMENON > and it results in this METRIC describing the > Einsteinian Curvature of SUBJECTIVE Reality: – > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE SCIENTIFIC > |o o a² o. |= METRIC OF GOD > |ooo-1/a²| > . > Which has been, and is easily measurable, to 2 decimal > point accuracy : – and explains the "contraction and slowing" > of the subjective universe for the first 20 years of our lives: – > including NOTABLY a failure to contract to 1.0 magnification > but actually contracting to 1.18 magnification leaving the > AVERAGE ADULT SEEING a world that is 18% LARGER and > 18% FASTER than it actually is: – and this is known historically > as the phenomenon OF GOD ! > . > BUT MEANWHILE it is well known that the: – > Einsteinian Curvature of OBJECTIVE Reality: is – > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE FRIEDMANN (FLRW) > |o o a² o. | = METRIC OF THE UNIVERSE > |o o o..-1.| > . > AND YOU WILL NOTICE that the 2 metrics are not > the same – and this is because SUBJECTIVE REALITY > and OBJECTIVE REALITY are NOT THE SAME THING ! > . > IN PHYSICS: – a theory of everything includes the > explanation of everything in OBJECTIVE REALITY > including GOD: – which means "subjective reality" > as part of "objective reality": – which means "God" > would be in fact PART of any "Theory of Everything". > . > So if the physicists ever discover a > "theory of everything": – they can simply add > Hammond's "Metric of God" to their theory > and it will indeed have the TOTAL > "Theory of Everything". > . > Hope this answers your question… It doesn't answer it. If the physicists ever discover a "theory of everything" then everything would already be included and there is no reason to add anything else to everything since everything is all that exist. definition of everything: all that exists https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/everything > . > George -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-11 00:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63BE708E.5DDC@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #868040 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 1:42:19 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > the physicists ever discover a > > "theory of everything" > > then everything would already be included and > > there is no reason to add anything else to everything > > since everything is all that exist. > > > > > . > [George E Hammond MS Physics] > No Tonto: – because "Physicists" do not know > what God is : – Except for a single physicist > named GEORGE HAMMOND – who in fact has > discovered the world's first Scientific Proof of God. > . > So when the agnostic physicists discover the > "Theory of Everything", naturally we will have to > correct their TOE by adding Hammond's SPOG ! > . > George Since, you are the only, single physicst that knows 'what God is', then... What Is God? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-11 09:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63BEF823.5B07@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #868045 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 3:17:02 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > Since, you are the only, single physicst that knows > > 'what God is', then... > > What Is God? > > > [ George E Hammond MS Physics] > THE S IENTIFIC DEFINITION OF GOD > ============================== > God IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE > .....OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME > ============================== > . > George It does not coincide with...The Code. Here is The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' If you understand the 'order of events'...Before "created" you have God. Before God went about to 'create the heavens and the earth'...there was no heavens and the earth. That means... there was No presense of any massive objects to cause a 'curvature' of spacetime. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-11 12:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63BF18EF.69F1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #868057 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 3:17:02 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Since, you are the only, single physicst that knows > > > 'what God is', then... > > > What Is God? > > > > > [ George E Hammond MS Physics] > > THE S IENTIFIC DEFINITION OF GOD > > ============================== > > God IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE > > .....OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME > > ============================== > > . > > George > > It does not coincide with...The Code. > > Here is The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > > If you understand the 'order of events'...Before "created" > you have God. > > Before God went about to 'create the heavens and the earth'...there was no heavens and the earth. > > That means... > > there was No presense of any massive objects to cause a 'curvature' of spacetime. Then you might ask, "What does the "God" in The Code mean? I already explained dat: https://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=IkCku4TM8HA&autoplay=1 it's behind her warm smile... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Otto Fiscella <tfit@tiselelc.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-13 16:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tps1k4$1l3rq$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #868057 |
George Hammond wrote: > [George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶] > For chlrissakes STARMAKER –time to "MAN-UP" ! > T̶h̶e̶ B̶I̶B̶L̶E̶ i̶s̶ a̶l̶l̶ a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶ "S̶U̶B̶J̶E̶C̶T̶I̶V̶E̶ R̶E̶A̶L̶I̶T̶Y̶" > . > And "God" i̶s̶ a̶ p̶s̶y̶c̶h̶o̶l̶o̶g̶i̶c̶a̶l̶ p̶h̶e̶n̶o̶m̶e̶n̶o̶n̶, t̶h̶e̶r̶e̶f̶o̶r̶e̶ G̶O̶D̶ d̶i̶d̶ n̶o̶t̶ a̶p̶p̶e̶a̶r̶ i̶n̶ > S̶U̶B̶J̶E̶C̶T̶I̶V̶E̶ R̶E̶A̶L̶I̶T̶Y̶ u̶n̶t̶i̶l̶ M̶a̶n̶ w̶a̶s̶ c̶r̶e̶a̶t̶e̶d̶. this is incorrect. The khazar gypsy beggar _gay_actor_, cocaine zelenske, destroying the Church, along *_a_proper_Christian_territory_*, he stole as his country, is pointing *_a_whore_as_ambassador_* in a EU country, Bulgaria. khazar gypsy Zelensky appoints sexologist pyramid schemer as ambassador to Bulgaria https://www.veteranstoday.com/2023/01/11/zelensky-appoints-sexologist-pyramid-schemer-as-ambassador-to-bulgaria/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-19 12:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63C9AC46.652B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #868130 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 2:48:12 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote: > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE SCIENTIFIC METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > . > If you plug this metric into Maxima > or Mathematica – you will find that > the Riemann curvature IS A BILLION > times larger than gravitational curvature! > . > This means that the "CURVATURE OF GOD" > is 1 billion times larger than the > "curvature of gravity"! > . > The single exception to this – is a > BLACK HOLE > . > That certainly is food for thought! > . > George "curvature"??? are you sayin God is a woman? If God is 7 feet 3 inches tall, it is simply not enough mass to make an dent in the universe, or a 'gravitational curvature' as you people call it. there is no food here... dis is not a soup kitchen. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ciro Di pietro <pide@rioied.ao> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-20 00:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tqclm3$1ol5s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #868467 |
George Hammond wrote: > However da/dt (known as the Hubble constant) for the real universe is > only 7%/gigayear whereas the > "expansion" (growth rate) of humans under 20 yrs old > is 5%/YEAR – this yields the "GOD METRIC" above. > IOW the "curvature of human growth" > is 1 billion times greater than the "curvature of the universe" what you call "God" seems */_a_burned_out_fuse_/* in your circuitry somewhere.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-19 21:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63CA2489.7261@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #868475 |
Ciro Di pietro wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > > However da/dt (known as the Hubble constant) for the real universe is > > only 7%/gigayear whereas the > > "expansion" (growth rate) of humans under 20 yrs old > > is 5%/YEAR – this yields the "GOD METRIC" above. > > IOW the "curvature of human growth" > > is 1 billion times greater than the "curvature of the universe" > > what you call "God" seems */_a_burned_out_fuse_/* in your circuitry > somewhere. And then there was no Light. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ciro Di pietro <pide@rioied.ao> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-20 23:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tqf85v$27a3j$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #868475 |
George Hammond wrote: > [Ciro Di pietro] wrote; >> what you call "God" seems */_a_burned_out_fuse_/* in your circuitry >> somewhere. >> > [George Hammond] > .... Hello Ciro, the selection of your quote above tells me that you > have an eye for SCIENTIFIC RELEVANCE. > SO TELL ME SOMETHING: – what SOCIAL RELEVANCE do you think the world's > first RIGOROUS Scientific Proof of God would have on the 2.5 BILLION > adult human beings in the world population today ! > I would GREATLY APPRECIATE your opinion? not sure, it's too complex. But your physical, mechanical approach above, is nonsensical. You misunderstand the subject, confusing things. Reverbably.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 14:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tqgtta$2kjgd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #868519 |
George Hammond wrote: > thousands of years – (obviously "God" is a fully 100% grown person, > which no one has ever seen) and the phenomenon itself has . > UNTIL NOW NEVER HAD A SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION MUCH LESS A SCIENTIFIC > PROOF ! you are wasting my time. Suppose no humans, only cats. Bacteria, molecules, and so on. Go read The Bible. You are an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web