Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #867414 > unrolled thread

Charles Manson and Albert Einstein

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2023-01-01 17:45 -0800
Last post2023-01-05 20:09 -0800
Articles 19 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 17:45 -0800
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:40 -0800
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 11:41 -0800
        Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:51 -0800
          Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:55 -0800
            Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 23:03 -0800
              Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:08 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:11 -0800
                  Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:16 -0800
                    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:20 -0800
                      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:28 -0800
                        Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:32 -0800
                          Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 10:19 -0800
                            Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 00:55 -0800
                            Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 12:59 -0800
                              Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 17:52 -0800
                                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 11:32 -0800
          Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein D. Ray <d@ray> - 2023-01-03 07:46 +0000
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 20:09 -0800

#867414 — Charles Manson and Albert Einstein

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-01 17:45 -0800
SubjectCharles Manson and Albert Einstein
Message-ID<63B23747.119C@ix.netcom.com>
What do Charles Manson and Albert Einstein have in common?

Charles Manson didn't kill anybody. 

at leat not directly, maybe indirectly....very indirectly.


In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."


https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gbv=2&sxsrf=ALiCzsYuaoWURDQyNmtvckAswbcqjmkhNg%3A1672623179247&q=albert+einstein+letter+to+his+%22son%22+%E2%80%9Conly+very+indirectly+connected



 very indirectly



 





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#867430

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-01 21:40 -0800
Message-ID<63B26E39.51E1@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867414
Richard Hertz wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> 
> The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.

Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
suppose to talk about it
to others outside the project.  Who would admit to talking to Einstein
about all the work being done?

Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
got the electric chair.


Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
connected.


That means he used...liaisons. 


a buffer. he used buffers.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867482

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2023-01-02 11:41 -0800
Message-ID<383e8c3b-b6bc-444e-a89c-7434faebce75n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#867430
On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > 
> > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected." 
> >
> > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it. 
> 
> Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not 
> suppose to talk about it 
> to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein 
> about all the work being done? 
> 
> Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others 
> got the electric chair.
> Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly 
> connected.
> That means he used...liaisons. 
> 
> 
> a buffer. he used buffers.
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.

You have a wicked way of representing that man.
After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
to the world. He never liked the government decision
to use it over the Japanese.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867527

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-02 22:51 -0800
Message-ID<63B3D05E.7B15@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867482
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > >
> > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> >
> > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > suppose to talk about it
> > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > about all the work being done?
> >
> > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > got the electric chair.
> > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > connected.
> > That means he used...liaisons.
> >
> >
> > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
> 
> You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> to the world. He never liked the government decision
> to use it over the Japanese.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch


"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein 


I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.


Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
people...dead.


I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.

I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867528

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-02 22:55 -0800
Message-ID<63B3D176.277F@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867527
https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280



I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > >
> > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > >
> > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > suppose to talk about it
> > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > about all the work being done?
> > >
> > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > got the electric chair.
> > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > connected.
> > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > >
> > >
> > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > to use it over the Japanese.
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> 
> I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> 
> Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> people...dead.
> 
> I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> 
> I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867529

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-02 23:03 -0800
Message-ID<63B3D324.4D6@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867528
But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?


Are you science guys working at it???? 



You guys mess up this planet.




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280
> 
> I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > >
> > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > >
> > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > >
> > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > about all the work being done?
> > > >
> > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > connected.
> > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
> > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> >
> > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> >
> > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > people...dead.
> >
> > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> >
> > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867583

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-03 15:08 -0800
Message-ID<63B4B56C.6D87@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867529
Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
"... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein

(albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)

But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?

This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:

What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he 
believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.

"You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325


wat about the 'other' scientist?



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> 
> Are you science guys working at it????
> 
> You guys mess up this planet.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280
> >
> > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > >
> > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > connected.
> > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > >
> > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > >
> > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > >
> > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > >
> > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > people...dead.
> > >
> > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > >
> > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867585

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-03 15:11 -0800
Message-ID<63B4B62C.1448@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867583
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/

If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then 
you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy, 
but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.

But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into 
more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.



Trust the Science.







The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
> "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein
> 
> (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)
> 
> But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?
> 
> This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:
> 
> What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
> Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
> believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.
> 
> "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
> https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325
> 
> wat about the 'other' scientist?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> >
> > Are you science guys working at it????
> >
> > You guys mess up this planet.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280
> > >
> > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > > connected.
> > > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > >
> > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > > >
> > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > > >
> > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > > people...dead.
> > > >
> > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > > >
> > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867586

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-03 15:16 -0800
Message-ID<63B4B745.1E8A@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867585
A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet

The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project, 
when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/



These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix.


Trust the Science.






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/
> 
> If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then
> you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy,
> but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.
> 
> But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into
> more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
> You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.
> 
> Trust the Science.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
> > "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein
> >
> > (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)
> >
> > But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?
> >
> > This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:
> >
> > What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
> > Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
> > believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.
> >
> > "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
> > https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325
> >
> > wat about the 'other' scientist?
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> > >
> > > Are you science guys working at it????
> > >
> > > You guys mess up this planet.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280
> > > >
> > > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > > > connected.
> > > > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > >
> > > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > > > >
> > > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > > > people...dead.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > and challenge
> > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867587

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-03 15:20 -0800
Message-ID<63B4B84D.62A4@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867586
You know all these science guys read Popular Mechanics

What Would it Take to Blow Up the Entire Earth?
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a27736/blow-up-earth/







The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet
> 
> The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project,
> when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet
> https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/
> 
> These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix.
> 
> Trust the Science.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/
> >
> > If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then
> > you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy,
> > but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.
> >
> > But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into
> > more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
> > You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.
> >
> > Trust the Science.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
> > > "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein
> > >
> > > (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)
> > >
> > > But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?
> > >
> > > This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:
> > >
> > > What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
> > > Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
> > > believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.
> > >
> > > "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
> > > https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325
> > >
> > > wat about the 'other' scientist?
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> > > >
> > > > Are you science guys working at it????
> > > >
> > > > You guys mess up this planet.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280
> > > > >
> > > > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > > > > connected.
> > > > > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > > > > people...dead.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867589

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-03 15:28 -0800
Message-ID<63B4BA28.1263@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867587
How to Destroy the Earth in Three Easy Steps
https://www.space.com/43014-how-to-destroy-the-earth.html



Yous need to exterminate all the scientists before they exterminate us all...start with Dr. Fauci. He loves Viruses! He wants to kill all the morons and low lifes.


In his mind that doesn't leave anybody much left.


This is suppose to be a secret
You are not suppose to know this..
But there are scientists today
planing to build a rocketship
and take themselves to another planet
and blow up the earth by remote control.
(something like dat)








The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> You know all these science guys read Popular Mechanics
> 
> What Would it Take to Blow Up the Entire Earth?
> https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a27736/blow-up-earth/
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet
> >
> > The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project,
> > when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet
> > https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/
> >
> > These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix.
> >
> > Trust the Science.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/
> > >
> > > If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then
> > > you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy,
> > > but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.
> > >
> > > But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into
> > > more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
> > > You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.
> > >
> > > Trust the Science.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
> > > > "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein
> > > >
> > > > (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)
> > > >
> > > > But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?
> > > >
> > > > This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:
> > > >
> > > > What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
> > > > Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
> > > > believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.
> > > >
> > > > "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
> > > > https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325
> > > >
> > > > wat about the 'other' scientist?
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you science guys working at it????
> > > > >
> > > > > You guys mess up this planet.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > > > > > connected.
> > > > > > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > > > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > > > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > > > > > people...dead.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867590

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-03 15:32 -0800
Message-ID<63B4BB19.60F4@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867589
Neil deGrasse Tyson: How to Blow Up a Planet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBl9dK40dvw


i guess he wants to get rid of...Whitey!





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> How to Destroy the Earth in Three Easy Steps
> https://www.space.com/43014-how-to-destroy-the-earth.html
> 
> Yous need to exterminate all the scientists before they exterminate us all...start with Dr. Fauci. He loves Viruses! He wants to kill all the morons and low lifes.
> 
> In his mind that doesn't leave anybody much left.
> 
> This is suppose to be a secret
> You are not suppose to know this..
> But there are scientists today
> planing to build a rocketship
> and take themselves to another planet
> and blow up the earth by remote control.
> (something like dat)
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > You know all these science guys read Popular Mechanics
> >
> > What Would it Take to Blow Up the Entire Earth?
> > https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a27736/blow-up-earth/
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet
> > >
> > > The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project,
> > > when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet
> > > https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/
> > >
> > > These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix.
> > >
> > > Trust the Science.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/
> > > >
> > > > If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then
> > > > you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy,
> > > > but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.
> > > >
> > > > But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into
> > > > more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
> > > > You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.
> > > >
> > > > Trust the Science.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
> > > > > "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein
> > > > >
> > > > > (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)
> > > > >
> > > > > But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?
> > > > >
> > > > > This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:
> > > > >
> > > > > What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
> > > > > Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
> > > > > believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.
> > > > >
> > > > > "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
> > > > > https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325
> > > > >
> > > > > wat about the 'other' scientist?
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you science guys working at it????
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You guys mess up this planet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > > > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > > > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > > > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > connected.
> > > > > > > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > > > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > > > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > > > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > > > > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > > > > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > > > > > > people...dead.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867647

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-04 10:19 -0800
Message-ID<63B5C338.4DAE@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867590
Imagine if you will...
Neil deGrasse Tyson has a son
who sees his father
thinking about
"How to Blow Up a Planet"...

whats to stop his son from
growing up and inspired
to build a bomb to
Blow Up the Earth?


Keep in mind,
Albert Einstein
all on his own
without instructions
from anyone
went out and
gathered his students
and friends to
Build an Atomic Bomb!

Sat around his house
and conspired to convince
the President of the United Stayes
to give them money so they can...
https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first


And just recently
Dr.Fauci was sending money
to China lab to build
a virus that would destroy the world.

Dats wat these 'people' do.

They become..."Destroyer of Worlds".


Albert Einstein: "b) to speed up the experimental work, which is at present being car-

ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by

providing funds, ..." 
https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first


Who told Albert Einstein to perform atomic bomb experiments at Universities in the United States?


Are they today working on Blowing Up The Planet? They certaintly thinking about it.

And 'thinking about it' is the path to making it happen.

Oh, but of course..first they need funding from the government.


Sir:

      Some recent work by some mad scientis, which has been com-

municated to me be email, leads me to expect that the element blow-

up-the-planet may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im-

mediate future that can blow up the planet earth and surrounding planets.














The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Neil deGrasse Tyson: How to Blow Up a Planet
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBl9dK40dvw
> 
> i guess he wants to get rid of...Whitey!
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > How to Destroy the Earth in Three Easy Steps
> > https://www.space.com/43014-how-to-destroy-the-earth.html
> >
> > Yous need to exterminate all the scientists before they exterminate us all...start with Dr. Fauci. He loves Viruses! He wants to kill all the morons and low lifes.
> >
> > In his mind that doesn't leave anybody much left.
> >
> > This is suppose to be a secret
> > You are not suppose to know this..
> > But there are scientists today
> > planing to build a rocketship
> > and take themselves to another planet
> > and blow up the earth by remote control.
> > (something like dat)
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > You know all these science guys read Popular Mechanics
> > >
> > > What Would it Take to Blow Up the Entire Earth?
> > > https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a27736/blow-up-earth/
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet
> > > >
> > > > The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project,
> > > > when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet
> > > > https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/
> > > >
> > > > These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix.
> > > >
> > > > Trust the Science.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/
> > > > >
> > > > > If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then
> > > > > you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy,
> > > > > but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.
> > > > >
> > > > > But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into
> > > > > more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
> > > > > You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Trust the Science.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
> > > > > > "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
> > > > > > Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
> > > > > > believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
> > > > > > https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wat about the 'other' scientist?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you science guys working at it????
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You guys mess up this planet.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > > > > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > > > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > > > > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > > > > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > > > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > > connected.
> > > > > > > > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > > > > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > > > > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > > > > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > > > > > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > > > > > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > > > > > > > people...dead.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867676

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-05 00:55 -0800
Message-ID<63B69088.1CD0@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867647
Here is what ChatGPT sez about Albert Einstein:

It is true that Albert Einstein had some indirect involvement in the development of nuclear weapons through his work as a consultant to 
the US military during World War II. In the early 1940s, Einstein was asked to serve as a consultant to the US military on the development of weapons, including 
the potential use of nuclear energy as a weapon. He agreed to lend his expertise to the effort and worked with a team of scientists at the Army's 
laboratory in Washington, D.C., where he helped to develop the first theories about how a nuclear weapon might be designed. However, 
Einstein did not have any direct involvement in the construction or testing of nuclear weapons. He was not a member of the Manhattan Project, 
the top-secret US government research program that developed the first atomic bombs. Instead, he served as a 
consultant and provided his expertise on the theoretical aspects of nuclear weapons development.

However, the details of Einstein's work and the specific contributions he made to the military's weapons development 
program have not been widely disclosed. It is likely that much of the information about Einstein's work for the military remains classified to this day.


--
*In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Imagine if you will...
> Neil deGrasse Tyson has a son
> who sees his father
> thinking about
> "How to Blow Up a Planet"...
> 
> whats to stop his son from
> growing up and inspired
> to build a bomb to
> Blow Up the Earth?
> 
> Keep in mind,
> Albert Einstein
> all on his own
> without instructions
> from anyone
> went out and
> gathered his students
> and friends to
> Build an Atomic Bomb!
> 
> Sat around his house
> and conspired to convince
> the President of the United Stayes
> to give them money so they can...
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> And just recently
> Dr.Fauci was sending money
> to China lab to build
> a virus that would destroy the world.
> 
> Dats wat these 'people' do.
> 
> They become..."Destroyer of Worlds".
> 
> Albert Einstein: "b) to speed up the experimental work, which is at present being car-
> 
> ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by
> 
> providing funds, ..."
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> Who told Albert Einstein to perform atomic bomb experiments at Universities in the United States?
> 
> Are they today working on Blowing Up The Planet? They certaintly thinking about it.
> 
> And 'thinking about it' is the path to making it happen.
> 
> Oh, but of course..first they need funding from the government.
> 
> Sir:
> 
>       Some recent work by some mad scientis, which has been com-
> 
> municated to me be email, leads me to expect that the element blow-
> 
> up-the-planet may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im-
> 
> mediate future that can blow up the planet earth and surrounding planets.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Neil deGrasse Tyson: How to Blow Up a Planet
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBl9dK40dvw
> >
> > i guess he wants to get rid of...Whitey!
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > How to Destroy the Earth in Three Easy Steps
> > > https://www.space.com/43014-how-to-destroy-the-earth.html
> > >
> > > Yous need to exterminate all the scientists before they exterminate us all...start with Dr. Fauci. He loves Viruses! He wants to kill all the morons and low lifes.
> > >
> > > In his mind that doesn't leave anybody much left.
> > >
> > > This is suppose to be a secret
> > > You are not suppose to know this..
> > > But there are scientists today
> > > planing to build a rocketship
> > > and take themselves to another planet
> > > and blow up the earth by remote control.
> > > (something like dat)
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You know all these science guys read Popular Mechanics
> > > >
> > > > What Would it Take to Blow Up the Entire Earth?
> > > > https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a27736/blow-up-earth/
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet
> > > > >
> > > > > The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project,
> > > > > when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet
> > > > > https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/
> > > > >
> > > > > These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix.
> > > > >
> > > > > Trust the Science.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then
> > > > > > you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy,
> > > > > > but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into
> > > > > > more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
> > > > > > You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Trust the Science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
> > > > > > > "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
> > > > > > > Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
> > > > > > > believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
> > > > > > > https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wat about the 'other' scientist?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are you science guys working at it????
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You guys mess up this planet.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=128
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > > > > > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > > > > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > > > > > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > > > > > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > > > connected.
> > > > > > > > > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > > > > > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > > > > > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > > > > > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > > > > > > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > > > > > > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > > > > > > > > people...dead.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867696

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-05 12:59 -0800
Message-ID<63B73A3A.847@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867647
Of course, if you ask ChatGPT "How to Blow Up a Planet"
ChatGPT might get a little nervous...
and then end the reponse with..."How about a game of Chess?"



So, I asked ChatGPT: How about the moon instead?

Blowing up the moon would also be a very difficult task. The moon is about one-quarter the size of Earth
 and has a mass of about 7.3 x 10^22 kilograms. To destroy the moon, you would need to apply a force that is 
strong enough to shatter it into pieces. This would require an enormous amount of energy, far beyond what humanity is capable of producing.

Additionally, the moon plays an important role in Earth's ecosystem and the stability of our planet's orbit. 
Its gravitational pull helps to regulate the tides and keeps our planet stable as it orbits the sun. Without the moon, 
life on Earth would be very different, and it's likely that it would not be able to sustain itself. 
It is not advisable to try to destroy the moon or any other celestial body in our solar system. Is there anything else I can help with?






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Imagine if you will...
> Neil deGrasse Tyson has a son
> who sees his father
> thinking about
> "How to Blow Up a Planet"...
> 
> whats to stop his son from
> growing up and inspired
> to build a bomb to
> Blow Up the Earth?
> 
> Keep in mind,
> Albert Einstein
> all on his own
> without instructions
> from anyone
> went out and
> gathered his students
> and friends to
> Build an Atomic Bomb!
> 
> Sat around his house
> and conspired to convince
> the President of the United Stayes
> to give them money so they can...
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> And just recently
> Dr.Fauci was sending money
> to China lab to build
> a virus that would destroy the world.
> 
> Dats wat these 'people' do.
> 
> They become..."Destroyer of Worlds".
> 
> Albert Einstein: "b) to speed up the experimental work, which is at present being car-
> 
> ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by
> 
> providing funds, ..."
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> Who told Albert Einstein to perform atomic bomb experiments at Universities in the United States?
> 
> Are they today working on Blowing Up The Planet? They certaintly thinking about it.
> 
> And 'thinking about it' is the path to making it happen.
> 
> Oh, but of course..first they need funding from the government.
> 
> Sir:
> 
>       Some recent work by some mad scientis, which has been com-
> 
> municated to me be email, leads me to expect that the element blow-
> 
> up-the-planet may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im-
> 
> mediate future that can blow up the planet earth and surrounding planets.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Neil deGrasse Tyson: How to Blow Up a Planet
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBl9dK40dvw
> >
> > i guess he wants to get rid of...Whitey!
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > How to Destroy the Earth in Three Easy Steps
> > > https://www.space.com/43014-how-to-destroy-the-earth.html
> > >
> > > Yous need to exterminate all the scientists before they exterminate us all...start with Dr. Fauci. He loves Viruses! He wants to kill all the morons and low lifes.
> > >
> > > In his mind that doesn't leave anybody much left.
> > >
> > > This is suppose to be a secret
> > > You are not suppose to know this..
> > > But there are scientists today
> > > planing to build a rocketship
> > > and take themselves to another planet
> > > and blow up the earth by remote control.
> > > (something like dat)
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You know all these science guys read Popular Mechanics
> > > >
> > > > What Would it Take to Blow Up the Entire Earth?
> > > > https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a27736/blow-up-earth/
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet
> > > > >
> > > > > The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project,
> > > > > when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet
> > > > > https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/
> > > > >
> > > > > These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix.
> > > > >
> > > > > Trust the Science.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then
> > > > > > you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy,
> > > > > > but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into
> > > > > > more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
> > > > > > You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Trust the Science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
> > > > > > > "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
> > > > > > > Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
> > > > > > > believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
> > > > > > > https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wat about the 'other' scientist?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are you science guys working at it????
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You guys mess up this planet.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=128
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > > > > > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > > > > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > > > > > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > > > > > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > > > connected.
> > > > > > > > > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > > > > > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > > > > > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > > > > > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > > > > > > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > > > > > > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > > > > > > > > people...dead.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867709

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-05 17:52 -0800
Message-ID<63B77EC4.6108@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867696
Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 12:59:37 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > Blowing up the moon would also be a very difficult task. The moon is about one-quarter the size of Earth...
> 
> Your ignorance is just mind-blowing...
> 
> https://www.universetoday.com/20489/moon-compared-to-earth/
> 
> "The volume of the Moon is 21.9 billion cubic km. Again, that sounds like a huge number, but the volume of the Earth is more like 1 trillion cubic kilometers. So the volume of the Moon is only 2% compared to the volume of the Earth."
> 
> 2%!

I don't know here you got the word "volume" from but
The moon is STILL about one-quarter the size of Earth...

How big is the Moon?

This one's another easy approximation to remember: The Moon is about one-fourth (or a quarter) the size of Earth in width. Put another way, Earth is about four times wider than the Moon.

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/1946/five-things-to-know-about-the-moon/



(but everyone knows here you have a pattern and reputation of being wrong...all the time.)

keep up the good work of being ...consistent.


i bet you never heard of ChatGPT either.


boy, are you dumb! you're soooo yesterday.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867736

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-01-06 11:32 -0800
Message-ID<63B8775F.16A7@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#867709
Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 5:52:01 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 12:59:37 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > > Blowing up the moon would also be a very difficult task. The moon is about one-quarter the size of Earth...
> > >
> > > Your ignorance is just mind-blowing...
> > >
> > > https://www.universetoday.com/20489/moon-compared-to-earth/
> > >
> > > "The volume of the Moon is 21.9 billion cubic km. Again, that sounds like a huge number, but the volume of the Earth is more like 1 trillion cubic kilometers. So the volume of the Moon is only 2% compared to the volume of the Earth."
> > >
> > > 2%!
> > I don't know here you got the word "volume" from but
> > The moon is STILL about one-quarter the size of Earth...
> >
> > How big is the Moon?
> >
> > This one's another easy approximation to remember: The Moon is about one-fourth (or a quarter) the size of Earth in width. Put another way, Earth is about four times wider than the Moon.
> 
> How is this relevant to the "blowing up the moon" crap you are spouting?

Exactly, you are...irrelevant. 



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867533

FromD. Ray <d@ray>
Date2023-01-03 07:46 +0000
Message-ID<pEDOFdZHwvcHeFwBOCyAYiHiHgTzAJPc@news.usenet.farm>
In reply to#867527
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> <snip>
>>>> 
>>>>> In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and
>>>>> the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
>>>> 
>>>> The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said
>>>> it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
>>> 
>>> Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
>>> suppose to talk about it
>>> to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
>>> about all the work being done?
>>> 
>>> Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
>>> got the electric chair.
>>> Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
>>> connected.
>>> That means he used...liaisons.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> a buffer. he used buffers.
>>> --
>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> and challenge
>>> the unchallengeable.
>> 
>> You have a wicked way of representing that man.
>> After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
>> He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
>> to the world. He never liked the government decision
>> to use it over the Japanese.
>> 
>> Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> 
> "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein 
> 
> 
> I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> 
> 
> Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> people...dead.
> 
> 
> I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> 
> I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...

Jews always hated Germans, and other Europeans, too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#867711

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2023-01-05 20:09 -0800
Message-ID<a1371077-8c29-49b7-8274-0a2348bda771n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#867414
Starmaker ██۞██ Moscow and Tehran electric blackouts██۞██ 
Kibo Parry M. is he using bola or javelin short circuit weapons??? 

Kibo, why not just use drones, I was reading that France makes the worlds best drones. 
Kibo, does bow and arrow with aluminum foil streamers tied to arrow, work better than javelin or bola??? 

Kibo Parry CIA undercover 
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 10:26:03 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you--- 
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster 
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes: 
> > 

> Moscow electric Blackouts██۞██ 

James Parry dunce in sci.math & sci,physics 
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 11:49:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> Pluto, so you finally tracked down James Parry in Moscow? 
> 
> But once again, that sentence no verb. 
> 
> Kibo WAS short circuiting Moscow electricity? 
> Kibo WILL BE short circuiting Moscow electricity? 
> Kibo PLANS ON short circuiting Moscow electricity? 
> Kibo THINKS ABOUT short circuiting Moscow electricity? 
> 
> ..? 
> 
> Now that you found Kibo, will you stop pretending that I am Kibo? 
> Hopefully he won't be using your aluminum pole idea, otherwise there 
> will be an ex-Kibo. As in: 
> 
> Kibo WAS VAPORIZED WHILE short circuiting Moscow electricity. 

Kibo, is Xi aware of the fact that Outer Manchuria is 28 times bigger than Taiwan???? 
> 
> 
> 
> > And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China. 

> > > > > > Kibo in a javelin throw to knock out Moscow high voltage lines 
> > > > > >> ........///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////| 
> > > > > >> ......///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////..| 
> > > > > >> ....///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////....| Moscow 
> > > > > >> ..///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////......| Electric 
> > > > > >> ///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////........| Tower 
> > > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|......../ 
> > > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|....../ 
> > > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|..../ 
> > > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|../ 
> > > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|/ 


> Vitaly a freedom fighter in Russia 
..............................^ 
..............................|| 
..............................|| 
.....................//////// || 
.....................|:---[.] || 
......................|( _J || 
....................| ^ ( _| || 
................../ \_____)|| Kibo Parry with fake wig 
................. / _____ \|| Long Aluminum **javelin** to throw to short circuit 
..................... | / \ |...|| 
..................... | | | |...|| 
................. \ /\ /\__ | || 
..................... | | \/--- || 
...................... \ \ )....|| 
................... | >____||/_____) 
................... \______||____/ 
......................... / \ 
...................... | | ~~ 
..................... \ \\ 
.................... \ |\ 
...................., \ | \ 
.................... \ | | 
.................... | | | 
.................... | | | 
..................... | / | 
.................... |___/____| 
.................... (____)____) 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web