Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #866172 > unrolled thread

ChatGPT

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-14 09:56 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 18:20 +0000
      Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 13:41 -0600
    Re: ChatGPT Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 18:23 +0000
    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-14 23:31 -0800
      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-15 10:04 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 23:33 -0800
      Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 23:39 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2022-12-15 12:35 -0600
          Re: ChatGPT James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 13:09 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-21 13:32 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 21:39 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-22 07:53 -0800
                  Re: ChatGPT Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 12:36 -0800
                    Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-22 13:08 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-21 11:14 -0800
      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-30 16:51 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 19:14 -0600
        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 17:10 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 17:38 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 19:21 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 20:26 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:30 -0800
                  Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-02 06:50 -0800
                    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:18 -0800
                      Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-02 09:19 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-01 22:51 -0600
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:41 -0800
                  Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-02 08:22 -0600
                    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:28 -0800
                      Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-03 09:54 -0600
                  Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:39 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:36 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:39 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 18:06 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 20:28 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:53 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:20 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 23:50 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:25 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 19:26 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 10:33 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 12:35 -0800
                  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 21:11 -0800
                    Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 14:00 -0800
                      Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-05 16:53 -0600
                    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 14:51 -0800
                      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 15:21 -0800
      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-20 10:53 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 16:13 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 19:24 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 22:20 -0600
              Re: ChatGPT Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 22:12 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 14:19 -0500
                Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-27 15:56 -0600
                  Re: ChatGPT Dasha Linde <dashalinde@pptp.de> - 2023-02-28 00:23 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 23:40 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-26 01:54 -0600
              Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 17:12 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 18:55 +0000
                  Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:12 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 11:53 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 21:20 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 21:43 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-27 12:26 -0800
                  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 13:05 -0800
                    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:36 -0800
                    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-30 11:07 -0700
                      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-01 10:22 -0700
                      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-08 15:29 -0700
                        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-11 10:57 -0700
                          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 18:45 -0700
                            Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 21:05 -0500
                              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 19:40 -0700
                                Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 -0500
                                  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 22:22 -0700
                                    Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 03:31 -0500
                                      Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 18:17 -0500
                            Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 21:16 -0700
                  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:57 -0800
                    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-01 16:47 -0800
                      Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-02 17:24 -0600
                        Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 16:45 -0800
                        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 11:18 -0800
                          Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 12:06 -0800
                          Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-03 20:39 -0600
                            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:22 -0800
                              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:27 -0800
                                Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:51 -0600
                              Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:41 -0600
      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-12 11:01 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 14:15 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-04-01 13:49 -0700

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

#866172 — ChatGPT

ChatGPT looks like
it does a better
job of
writing programs
then all those
guys out there
on freelance sites.

ChatGPT doesn't
ask stupid questions
like 
"What do you want this for?"
or
"This looks illegal."

ChatGPT just
codes for you without
a conscious.

Blackhat ChatGPT 
is cool.

It's like asking
Albert Einstein,
"Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
and it might ask...

"Do you want it to be
launched from a submarine or
a suitcase?"

Then I might ask  ChatGPT...

Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type 
constructed to blow up the whole Earth!

and ChatGPT might say:

"Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
port, might very well destroy
the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."

GO FOR IT BRO!!!!


Isn't ChatGPT cool?





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#866174

The Starmaker wrote:

> ChatGPT looks like it does a better job of writing programs then all
> those guys out there on freelance sites.

sure, the cacapitalist america is faking a moon landing again, 
propagandizing an "artificial sun" as *thought_experiment*, stuff of which 
the Chinese are dealing with, "suns" lasting in tens of minutes, for years 
now. Disgraceful propaganda. The Chinese are going energy independent, 
when cacamerica suck dicks in "thought_experiments" and wars. lol. Take it 
america, take it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866180

On 12/14/2022 12:20 PM, Fabio Brambilla wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> 
>> ChatGPT looks like it does a better job of writing programs then all
>> those guys out there on freelance sites.
> 
> sure, the cacapitalist america is faking a moon landing again,
> propagandizing an "artificial sun" as *thought_experiment*, stuff of which
> the Chinese are dealing with, "suns" lasting in tens of minutes, for years
> now. Disgraceful propaganda. The Chinese are going energy independent,
> when cacamerica suck dicks in "thought_experiments" and wars. lol. Take it
> america, take it.


Take the psychotropic medications the doctor gave you. Please. The
hallucinations will go away if you do.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866175

The Starmaker wrote:

> ChatGPT looks like it does a better job of writing programs then all
> those guys out there on freelance sites.

lol, yet another fake manned moon landing.

US scientists announce major nuclear fusion breakthrough that could 'revolutionise the world' 
https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/12/12/scientists-in-the-us-to-announce-a-major-fusion-breakthrough-boosting-clean-energy-hopes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866211

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> ChatGPT looks like
> it does a better
> job of
> writing programs
> then all those
> guys out there
> on freelance sites.
> 
> ChatGPT doesn't
> ask stupid questions
> like
> "What do you want this for?"
> or
> "This looks illegal."
> 
> ChatGPT just
> codes for you without
> a conscious.
> 
> Blackhat ChatGPT
> is cool.
> 
> It's like asking
> Albert Einstein,
> "Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
> and it might ask...
> 
> "Do you want it to be
> launched from a submarine or
> a suitcase?"
> 
> Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
> 
> Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
> constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
> 
> and ChatGPT might say:
> 
> "Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
> port, might very well destroy
> the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
> 
> GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
> 
> Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> 

I would say that ChatGPT is today at a level
what Google was when Google first came out...
in those days you could do anything with Google.

For example, you can give an old Perl script
to ChatGPT, and have it convert to Python in seconds
what would take a human coder weeks to do...
and for FREE!

I understand you ChatGPT can build your website.

There are other things in can do...


maybe a theory of everything.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866236

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > ChatGPT looks like
> > it does a better
> > job of
> > writing programs
> > then all those
> > guys out there
> > on freelance sites.
> >
> > ChatGPT doesn't
> > ask stupid questions
> > like
> > "What do you want this for?"
> > or
> > "This looks illegal."
> >
> > ChatGPT just
> > codes for you without
> > a conscious.
> >
> > Blackhat ChatGPT
> > is cool.
> >
> > It's like asking
> > Albert Einstein,
> > "Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
> > and it might ask...
> >
> > "Do you want it to be
> > launched from a submarine or
> > a suitcase?"
> >
> > Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
> >
> > Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
> > constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
> >
> > and ChatGPT might say:
> >
> > "Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> > air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
> > port, might very well destroy
> > the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
> >
> > GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
> >
> > Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> >
> 
> I would say that ChatGPT is today at a level
> what Google was when Google first came out...
> in those days you could do anything with Google.
> 
> For example, you can give an old Perl script
> to ChatGPT, and have it convert to Python in seconds
> what would take a human coder weeks to do...
> and for FREE!

Just as in the beginning of Goggle
everyone was 'gaming' Google.

You can game ChatGPT by
watching the words/language
it uses to explain what it
is doing.

You get better results if
you use ChatGPT language
on itself.

Also, i notice ChatGPT
has less network errors...
i guess they are in the
process of fixing it.

I would say by next year
they will implement
advertisements.


Gotta game dat too!

Who needs books
if you got ChatGPT?






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866212

On 12/14/2022 9:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> ChatGPT looks like
> it does a better
> job of
> writing programs
> then all those
> guys out there
> on freelance sites.
> 
> ChatGPT doesn't
> ask stupid questions
> like
> "What do you want this for?"
> or
> "This looks illegal."
> 
> ChatGPT just
> codes for you without
> a conscious.
> 
> Blackhat ChatGPT
> is cool.
> 
> It's like asking
> Albert Einstein,
> "Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
> and it might ask...
> 
> "Do you want it to be
> launched from a submarine or
> a suitcase?"
> 
> Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
> 
> Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
> constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
> 
> and ChatGPT might say:
> 
> "Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
> port, might very well destroy
> the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
> 
> GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
> 
> 
> Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Bot style, attempt to become members of groups, just for fun. AI 
saturate the chatbot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866213

On 12/14/2022 11:33 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/14/2022 9:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> ChatGPT looks like
>> it does a better
>> job of
>> writing programs
>> then all those
>> guys out there
>> on freelance sites.
>>
>> ChatGPT doesn't
>> ask stupid questions
>> like
>> "What do you want this for?"
>> or
>> "This looks illegal."
>>
>> ChatGPT just
>> codes for you without
>> a conscious.
>>
>> Blackhat ChatGPT
>> is cool.
>>
>> It's like asking
>> Albert Einstein,
>> "Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
>> and it might ask...
>>
>> "Do you want it to be
>> launched from a submarine or
>> a suitcase?"
>>
>> Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
>>
>> Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
>> constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
>>
>> and ChatGPT might say:
>>
>> "Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
>> air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
>> port, might very well destroy
>> the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
>>
>> GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
>>
>>
>> Isn't ChatGPT cool?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Bot style, attempt to become members of groups, just for fun. AI 
> saturate the chatbot.

A chatbot with AI needs input... A LOT of input.... It reads all of the 
groups data. Then, wait... Builds some training data...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866240

On 12/15/2022 1:39 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/14/2022 11:33 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 12/14/2022 9:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> ChatGPT looks like
>>> it does a better
>>> job of
>>> writing programs
>>> then all those
>>> guys out there
>>> on freelance sites.
>>>
>>> ChatGPT doesn't
>>> ask stupid questions
>>> like
>>> "What do you want this for?"
>>> or
>>> "This looks illegal."
>>>
>>> ChatGPT just
>>> codes for you without
>>> a conscious.
>>>
>>> Blackhat ChatGPT
>>> is cool.
>>>
>>> It's like asking
>>> Albert Einstein,
>>> "Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
>>> and it might ask...
>>>
>>> "Do you want it to be
>>> launched from a submarine or
>>> a suitcase?"
>>>
>>> Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
>>>
>>> Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
>>> constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
>>>
>>> and ChatGPT might say:
>>>
>>> "Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
>>> air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
>>> port, might very well destroy
>>> the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
>>>
>>> GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>> Isn't ChatGPT cool?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Bot style, attempt to become members of groups, just for fun. AI saturate the chatbot.
> 
> A chatbot with AI needs input... A LOT of input.... It reads all of the groups data. Then, wait... Builds some training data...


James McGinn is easy to BOT up, he only uses about 200 different statements, no depth of knowledge

could get all his postings,  then use a subject to reference into his previous statements, and twist them a little, so they look different.

he starts high (several sentances), but sentences get shorter as the thread goes on, then down to a few words at the end.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866625

On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 10:35:17 AM UTC-8, Sergi o wrote:
> On 12/15/2022 1:39 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: 
> > On 12/14/2022 11:33 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: 
> >> On 12/14/2022 9:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: 
> >>> ChatGPT looks like 
> >>> it does a better 
> >>> job of 
> >>> writing programs 
> >>> then all those 
> >>> guys out there 
> >>> on freelance sites. 
> >>> 
> >>> ChatGPT doesn't 
> >>> ask stupid questions 
> >>> like 
> >>> "What do you want this for?" 
> >>> or 
> >>> "This looks illegal." 
> >>> 
> >>> ChatGPT just 
> >>> codes for you without 
> >>> a conscious. 
> >>> 
> >>> Blackhat ChatGPT 
> >>> is cool. 
> >>> 
> >>> It's like asking 
> >>> Albert Einstein, 
> >>> "Can you build me an atomic bomb?" 
> >>> and it might ask... 
> >>> 
> >>> "Do you want it to be 
> >>> launched from a submarine or 
> >>> a suitcase?" 
> >>> 
> >>> Then I might ask  ChatGPT... 
> >>> 
> >>> Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type 
> >>> constructed to blow up the whole Earth! 
> >>> 
> >>> and ChatGPT might say: 
> >>> 
> >>> "Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by 
> >>> air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a 
> >>> port, might very well destroy 
> >>> the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets." 
> >>> 
> >>> GO FOR IT BRO!!!! 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Isn't ChatGPT cool? 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Bot style, attempt to become members of groups, just for fun. AI saturate the chatbot. 
> > 
> > A chatbot with AI needs input... A LOT of input.... It reads all of the groups data. Then, wait... Builds some training data...
> James McGinn is easy to BOT up, he only uses about 200 different statements, no depth of knowledge 
> 
> could get all his postings, then use a subject to reference into his previous statements, and twist them a little, so they look different. 
> 
> he starts high (several sentances), but sentences get shorter as the thread goes on, then down to a few words at the end.

Maybe ChatGPT can help you morons figure out what your point is.  Or, at least, it can help you realize that you don't have one.

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866630

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

> Maybe ChatGPT can help you morons figure out what your point is.  Or, at least, it can help you realize that you don't have one.

So says the delusionally insane crackpot that refuses to accept the fact
that Dalton proved that gaseos H2O exists not only below the boiling
point but also below the freezing point over 200 years ago.

> 
> James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866660

On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:46:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> <snip>
> > Maybe ChatGPT can help you morons figure out what your point is. Or, at least, it can help you realize that you don't have one.
> So says the delusionally insane crackpot that refuses to accept the fact 
> that Dalton proved that gaseos H2O exists not only below the boiling 
> point but also below the freezing point over 200 years ago. 

You goons really oughta stop libeling and slandering dead scientists.  Stop putting  words in Dalton's mouth.

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866678

Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:46:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> 
>> <snip>
>> > Maybe ChatGPT can help you morons figure out what your point is. Or, at least, it can help you realize that you don't have one.
>> So says the delusionally insane crackpot that refuses to accept the fact 
>> that Dalton proved that gaseos H2O exists not only below the boiling 
>> point but also below the freezing point over 200 years ago. 
> 
> You goons really oughta stop libeling and slandering dead scientists.  Stop putting  words in Dalton's mouth.

Contrary to your insane ravings, Dalton's words are in the public domain
and can seen by anyone at:

https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Anyone that is that is not so delusionally insane that they are too
terrified to read what Dalton said.


> James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866699

On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 8:01:08 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Claudius Denk <claudi...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:46:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote: 
> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> <snip> 
> >> > Maybe ChatGPT can help you morons figure out what your point is. Or, at least, it can help you realize that you don't have one. 
> >> So says the delusionally insane crackpot that refuses to accept the fact 
> >> that Dalton proved that gaseos H2O exists not only below the boiling 
> >> point but also below the freezing point over 200 years ago. 
> > 
> > You goons really oughta stop libeling and slandering dead scientists. Stop putting words in Dalton's mouth.
> Contrary to your insane ravings, Dalton's words are in the public domain 

Then there's really no excuse for you pretending to speak for him.  Right?

James McGinn / Genius

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866703

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 8:01:08 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> Claudius Denk <claudi...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:46:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote: 
>> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> <snip> 
>> >> > Maybe ChatGPT can help you morons figure out what your point is. Or, at least, it can help you realize that you don't have one. 
>> >> So says the delusionally insane crackpot that refuses to accept the fact 
>> >> that Dalton proved that gaseos H2O exists not only below the boiling 
>> >> point but also below the freezing point over 200 years ago. 
>> > 
>> > You goons really oughta stop libeling and slandering dead scientists. Stop putting words in Dalton's mouth.
>> Contrary to your insane ravings, Dalton's words are in the public domain 
> 
> Then there's really no excuse for you pretending to speak for him.  Right?

As usual, your question is based on insane delusions and thus has no
rational answer, crackpot.


> James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#866613

‘Code Red’ 


https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/21/a-new-chat-bot-is-a-code-red-for-googles-search-business/



On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:56:05 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>ChatGPT looks like
>it does a better
>job of
>writing programs
>then all those
>guys out there
>on freelance sites.
>
>ChatGPT doesn't
>ask stupid questions
>like 
>"What do you want this for?"
>or
>"This looks illegal."
>
>ChatGPT just
>codes for you without
>a conscious.
>
>Blackhat ChatGPT 
>is cool.
>
>It's like asking
>Albert Einstein,
>"Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
>and it might ask...
>
>"Do you want it to be
>launched from a submarine or
>a suitcase?"
>
>Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
>
>Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type 
>constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
>
>and ChatGPT might say:
>
>"Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
>air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
>port, might very well destroy
>the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
>
>GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
>
>
>Isn't ChatGPT cool?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#867236

 How to write a code snippet using AI (OpenAI ChatGPT)
https://medium.com/geekculture/writing-code-snippet-using-ai-openai-chatgpt-d96e6073e894


...now, I created from scratch on ChatGPT
a new exciting code...and after
adjustments and fixing...it works!


Here is a small sample:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # Construct the control message
    message = "Control: cancel " + message_id + "\nCancel-Key: " +
message_id + "\n\n"

    # Retrieve the article header and body

    response, header_lines, article_number, message_id, \
        data = server.article(article_id)

    # Send the control message to the server
    # s.post(message)

    # Cancel the article
    server.ihave(message_id, data)

------------------------------------------------------------------------



I'm now King of Usenet!

Okay, let me see...who has been misbehaving here?


MY Gawd! You all a bunch of naughty boys!!!!

I'm going to have to go back and make some little adjustments here:

# Loop through all the articles in the newsgroup and cancel each
one...ALL of them!:
        for article_id in range



Hey! WHERE IS EVERYBODY???


       
Isn't ChatGPT cool?


Imagine you wake up tomorrow morning and there is no Usenet?



Isn't ChatGPT cool?


What else can I do wit it?


Oh, I can charge yous 'access' to Usenet...I mean, 'allow' you to
post.

What's the price for ...freedom? I don't think you can put a price on
dat.

Remember, if you're still here...it's because I ALLOW IT!



How about?
# Select and Loop through all the  newsgroups and remove each
one...ALL of them!:
        for newsgroups in range



I'm...GOD!

You have been created in My Image!



As a reminder, little people, there must be discipline here.


Discipline above all!















On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:14:14 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>‘Code Red’ 
>
>
>https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/21/a-new-chat-bot-is-a-code-red-for-googles-search-business/
>
>
>
>On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:56:05 -0800, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>ChatGPT looks like
>>it does a better
>>job of
>>writing programs
>>then all those
>>guys out there
>>on freelance sites.
>>
>>ChatGPT doesn't
>>ask stupid questions
>>like 
>>"What do you want this for?"
>>or
>>"This looks illegal."
>>
>>ChatGPT just
>>codes for you without
>>a conscious.
>>
>>Blackhat ChatGPT 
>>is cool.
>>
>>It's like asking
>>Albert Einstein,
>>"Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
>>and it might ask...
>>
>>"Do you want it to be
>>launched from a submarine or
>>a suitcase?"
>>
>>Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
>>
>>Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type 
>>constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
>>
>>and ChatGPT might say:
>>
>>"Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
>>air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
>>port, might very well destroy
>>the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
>>
>>GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
>>
>>
>>Isn't ChatGPT cool?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#867239

You apparently have to be told that these discussions you've been having
with yourself are extremely boring to anyone who has more than two
functioning neurons because you can't figure that out for yourself.

Did you understand that, Starmaker? Should I come up with other way(s)
to inform you?



On 12/30/2022 6:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>   How to write a code snippet using AI (OpenAI ChatGPT)
> https://medium.com/geekculture/writing-code-snippet-using-ai-openai-chatgpt-d96e6073e894
> 
> 
> ...now, I created from scratch on ChatGPT
> a new exciting code...and after
> adjustments and fixing...it works!
> 
> 
> Here is a small sample:
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   # Construct the control message
>      message = "Control: cancel " + message_id + "\nCancel-Key: " +
> message_id + "\n\n"
> 
>      # Retrieve the article header and body
> 
>      response, header_lines, article_number, message_id, \
>          data = server.article(article_id)
> 
>      # Send the control message to the server
>      # s.post(message)
> 
>      # Cancel the article
>      server.ihave(message_id, data)
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> I'm now King of Usenet!
> 
> Okay, let me see...who has been misbehaving here?
> 
> 
> MY Gawd! You all a bunch of naughty boys!!!!
> 
> I'm going to have to go back and make some little adjustments here:
> 
> # Loop through all the articles in the newsgroup and cancel each
> one...ALL of them!:
>          for article_id in range
> 
> 
> 
> Hey! WHERE IS EVERYBODY???
> 
> 
>         
> Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> 
> 
> Imagine you wake up tomorrow morning and there is no Usenet?
> 
> 
> 
> Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> 
> 
> What else can I do wit it?
> 
> 
> Oh, I can charge yous 'access' to Usenet...I mean, 'allow' you to
> post.
> 
> What's the price for ...freedom? I don't think you can put a price on
> dat.
> 
> Remember, if you're still here...it's because I ALLOW IT!
> 
> 
> 
> How about?
> # Select and Loop through all the  newsgroups and remove each
> one...ALL of them!:
>          for newsgroups in range
> 
> 
> 
> I'm...GOD!
> 
> You have been created in My Image!
> 
> 
> 
> As a reminder, little people, there must be discipline here.
> 
> 
> Discipline above all!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:14:14 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
>> ‘Code Red’
>>
>>
>> https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/21/a-new-chat-bot-is-a-code-red-for-googles-search-business/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:56:05 -0800, The Starmaker
>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ChatGPT looks like
>>> it does a better
>>> job of
>>> writing programs
>>> then all those
>>> guys out there
>>> on freelance sites.
>>>
>>> ChatGPT doesn't
>>> ask stupid questions
>>> like
>>> "What do you want this for?"
>>> or
>>> "This looks illegal."
>>>
>>> ChatGPT just
>>> codes for you without
>>> a conscious.
>>>
>>> Blackhat ChatGPT
>>> is cool.
>>>
>>> It's like asking
>>> Albert Einstein,
>>> "Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
>>> and it might ask...
>>>
>>> "Do you want it to be
>>> launched from a submarine or
>>> a suitcase?"
>>>
>>> Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
>>>
>>> Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
>>> constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
>>>
>>> and ChatGPT might say:
>>>
>>> "Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
>>> air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
>>> port, might very well destroy
>>> the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
>>>
>>> GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>> Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>   to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>   the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#867413

Cancel Wars begins now!

As yous already know the FBI and the CIA infiltrates all the tech
companies to cancel whoever they want (including the president of the
united states)


I'll show you how you can begin from scratch with...ChatGPT.

Insert these words in ChatGPT:

"Create a program written in Phyton which allows the user to auto-cancel
any message on Usenet based on author, subject, organization,
message-id, and path."

Then 'follow' and 'guide' ChatGPT to your finish cancel program. Test..
Then cancel me.


Here is more information if needed to feed ChatGPT with:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipcrime_(Usenet)

go to References 2.(for more deep level information)


Cancel Wars begins now!

Then cancel me.




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
>  How to write a code snippet using AI (OpenAI ChatGPT)
> https://medium.com/geekculture/writing-code-snippet-using-ai-openai-chatgpt-d96e6073e894
> 
> ...now, I created from scratch on ChatGPT
> a new exciting code...and after
> adjustments and fixing...it works!
> 
> Here is a small sample:
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  # Construct the control message
>     message = "Control: cancel " + message_id + "\nCancel-Key: " +
> message_id + "\n\n"
> 
>     # Retrieve the article header and body
> 
>     response, header_lines, article_number, message_id, \
>         data = server.article(article_id)
> 
>     # Send the control message to the server
>     # s.post(message)
> 
>     # Cancel the article
>     server.ihave(message_id, data)
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I'm now King of Usenet!
> 
> Okay, let me see...who has been misbehaving here?
> 
> MY Gawd! You all a bunch of naughty boys!!!!
> 
> I'm going to have to go back and make some little adjustments here:
> 
> # Loop through all the articles in the newsgroup and cancel each
> one...ALL of them!:
>         for article_id in range
> 
> Hey! WHERE IS EVERYBODY???
> 
> 
> Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> 
> Imagine you wake up tomorrow morning and there is no Usenet?
> 
> Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> 
> What else can I do wit it?
> 
> Oh, I can charge yous 'access' to Usenet...I mean, 'allow' you to
> post.
> 
> What's the price for ...freedom? I don't think you can put a price on
> dat.
> 
> Remember, if you're still here...it's because I ALLOW IT!
> 
> How about?
> # Select and Loop through all the  newsgroups and remove each
> one...ALL of them!:
>         for newsgroups in range
> 
> I'm...GOD!
> 
> You have been created in My Image!
> 
> As a reminder, little people, there must be discipline here.
> 
> Discipline above all!
> 
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:14:14 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >‘Code Red’
> >
> >
> >https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/21/a-new-chat-bot-is-a-code-red-for-googles-search-business/
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:56:05 -0800, The Starmaker
> ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> >>ChatGPT looks like
> >>it does a better
> >>job of
> >>writing programs
> >>then all those
> >>guys out there
> >>on freelance sites.
> >>
> >>ChatGPT doesn't
> >>ask stupid questions
> >>like
> >>"What do you want this for?"
> >>or
> >>"This looks illegal."
> >>
> >>ChatGPT just
> >>codes for you without
> >>a conscious.
> >>
> >>Blackhat ChatGPT
> >>is cool.
> >>
> >>It's like asking
> >>Albert Einstein,
> >>"Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
> >>and it might ask...
> >>
> >>"Do you want it to be
> >>launched from a submarine or
> >>a suitcase?"
> >>
> >>Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
> >>
> >>Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
> >>constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
> >>
> >>and ChatGPT might say:
> >>
> >>"Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> >>air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
> >>port, might very well destroy
> >>the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
> >>
> >>GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
> >>
> >>
> >>Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#867415

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Cancel Wars begins now!
> 
> As yous already know the FBI and the CIA infiltrates all the tech
> companies to cancel whoever they want (including the president of the
> united states)
> 
> 
> I'll show you how you can begin from scratch with...ChatGPT.
> 
> Insert these words in ChatGPT:
> 
> "Create a program written in Phyton which allows the user to auto-cancel
> any message on Usenet based on author, subject, organization,
> message-id, and path."
> 
> Then 'follow' and 'guide' ChatGPT to your finish cancel program. Test..
> Then cancel me.

Ordinary users can not cancel messages from others, only killfile them,
idiot.

<snip moronic tripe>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web