Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #864440 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-11-10 22:04 -0800 |
| Last post | 2022-11-29 20:09 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 56 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 22:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 12:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 10:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-14 21:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-15 13:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 10:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 11:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jules Scotti <ujsl@ocjssuis.os> - 2022-11-19 15:08 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 11:50 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 15:57 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 11:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 15:06 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 19:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 12:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 14:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 15:05 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 19:58 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:07 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-11-25 14:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:28 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:40 +0000
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 13:56 +0000
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 14:00 +0000
Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 18:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-25 20:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 19:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-28 14:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 00:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 17:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 18:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <efftard@donglemeier.com> - 2022-11-29 12:10 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Finis Mari <fmnf@isiifain.ii> - 2022-11-29 21:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> - 2022-11-29 21:10 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 13:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-30 16:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-02 21:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-18 23:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 12:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 22:55 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:22 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 21:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 20:41 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 21:37 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 19:43 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 20:57 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 19:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 22:21 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 14:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 20:09 -0800
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 14:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ths75j-a7vt.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #865301 |
In sci.physics Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > >> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 2:58:30 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: >>> George Hammond wrote: >>> >>> > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro >>> > wrote: >>> > [George Hammond MS physics] >>> > Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this >>> > thread George . >> . >> [Micheal Agnelli] >>> real bombs, as those used by your shithole of a country, destroying >>> energy pipelines to an entire continent. >> . >> [George Hammond MS physics USA] >> .... Listen you technical flunky moron – the Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT >> DEEP! >> There are thousands of fishing boats with fish finding depth sounder >> ONBOARD SONAR that could EASILY locate that 3 foot diameter concrete > > old and lying, piss off. Can't believe it, 80 years old and still lying. > It required stronger bombs than Hiroshima, fucking stupid. Under water you > need stronger bombs, plus, that a bed of strong concrete were to be blown > into pieces likewise, as I understood. Learn Physics from a school, you > idiot, not from internet and wikipedia. A normal bomb under water pressure > is *NOTHING*. You fucking uneducated idiot. Yeah, right, depth charges with only a couple hundred pounds of conventional explosives have never destroyed a submarine through hydraulic shock...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 22:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlrgjt$13ajr$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865301 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:07:55 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: >> old and lying, piss off. Can't believe it, 80 years old and still lying. >> It required stronger bombs than Hiroshima, fucking stupid. Under water >> you need stronger bombs, plus, that a bed of strong concrete were to be >> blown into pieces likewise, as I understood. Learn Physics from a >> school, you idiot, not from internet and wikipedia. A normal bomb under >> water pressure > . > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] My CV is: – > CURRICULUM VITAE GEORGE E. HAMMOND B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester > Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern > University, Boston MA, USA Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in > Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA. nothing. Zeroo. I said *stronger*, not nuclear, fucking stupid. You don't know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb to explode under water pressure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 00:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlrmip$13ajr$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865304 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:46:28 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: >> You don't > know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb to explode >> under water pressure. > . > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > ... You don't know what you're talking about – > I have 2-/2 college degrees in physics. > . > The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is > only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires! That's > nuthin ! that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 00:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlrn9d$13ajr$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865305 |
George Hammond wrote: > SNIP SPAM amazing, the proven crackpot uneducated troll, decays to "spam". I'm obliged to insist. George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:46:28 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: >> You don't > know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb to explode >> under water pressure. > . > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > ... You don't know what you're talking about – > I have 2-/2 college degrees in physics. > . > The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is > only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires! That's > nuthin ! that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 13:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God |
| Message-ID | <tlt5tl$1d2h8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865306 |
uneducated crackpot George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:40:17 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: > . > [George Hammond MS physics] > you obviously have no scientific credentials and little or no scientific > competence – I have 2 degrees in physics. > .... Your statements are scientifically IRRELEVANT and RIDICULOUS. > SNIP SPAM . you can wipe your stupid ass with your "degrees". Avoiding *re_quoting_yourself*, equating *air* to an *INCOMPREHENSIBLE* and high viscosity liquid, as *water_under_high_pressure* you fucking idiot. How would you explain that, you stupid crackpot. Allow me to specify, for the newcomers, to see, the stupid you are. ______ > The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is > only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires! That's > nuthin ! that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid. _______
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 14:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God |
| Message-ID | <tlt65b$1d2h8$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865312 |
Micheal Agnelli wrote: > uneducated crackpot George Hammond wrote: > >> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:40:17 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli >> wrote: >> . >> [George Hammond MS physics] >> you obviously have no scientific credentials and little or no >> scientific competence – I have 2 degrees in physics. >> .... Your statements are scientifically IRRELEVANT and RIDICULOUS. >> SNIP SPAM . > > you can wipe your stupid ass with your "degrees". Avoiding > *re_quoting_yourself*, equating *air* to an *INCOMPREHENSIBLE* and high *INCOMPRESSIBLE*. > viscosity liquid, as *water_under_high_pressure* you fucking idiot. How > would you explain that, you stupid crackpot. > > Allow me to specify, for the newcomers, to see, the stupid you are. > > ______ >> The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is >> only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires! That's >> nuthin ! > > that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high > viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid. > _______
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 18:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God |
| Message-ID | <tltmi2$1ea96$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865313 |
uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth: >> > that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high >> > viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid. > .. > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > CURRICULUM VITAE B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute > Worcester MA, USA M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, > USA Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern > U..Boston MA. worthless piece of toilet paper, you fucking janitor. > And furthermore MORON – a surplus World War II submarine depth charge > can be bought on the underground Arms black-market for probably a couple > of grand at the most. It is capable of easily collapsing the PRESSURE > HULL of a submarine never mind a flimsy "gas pipeline". > ... YOU'RE SCIENTIFICALLY STUPID ... GET OUTTA HEAH George fucking cretin, proving once again your imbecility. Gas under *_high_pressure_*, in the pipes. Which adds to the necessary strength of the detonation, recorded as an *_earthquake_*. Three days (3) of gas eruption, you inbreed idiot. a diploma from cacamerica is NOTHING in europe. Fake manned moon landing and such. If you want a proper moon landing, you go to Russia and China. And India, as I can see. Proofs: https://www.google.com/search?q=nord+stream-explosion&tbm=isch&source=lnms
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 20:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63819115.7F07@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #865234 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:24:47 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > [STARMAKER] > > > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond. > > > "Fortunately for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific > > > explanation..." > > > Who is this other guy you call Hammond? > > > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > .... Cut the bullshit Starmaker – you're supposed to know about writing > in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd PERSON by the time you're outta the 6th grade. > . > LISTEN – I GOT AN IDEA ! I'm thinking about making a NETFLIX MOVIE > about the "WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD". > . > Publishing a paper, writing a book, making a YouTube video – are USELESS – > and the chances of getting it on TELEVISION are zilch. Sosomeone suggested > "MAKE A NETFLIX MOVIE" – – – – AND I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA > . > Do you know anything about NETFLIX ? > . > George I'm a starmaker, not a moviemaker. Have you ever in your entire life performed an experiment? Did you performed the first experimental measurement of God?? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 19:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tltoiq$1efl7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865308 |
George Hammond wrote: > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > ... No AND NEITHER DID ALBERT EINSTEIN perform any experiments! > Listen you aggravated F – – KWIT – I already told you a 1000 man PhD > academic army performed the experiments over 50 years worldwide testing > millions of people and they discovered the TOP EIGENVECTOR In All of > Psychology and named it the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology) and > because nothing. Idiocies. Here you have faking a nazi flag on moon, forgetting the Earth, 66⁰ above the horizon, 4 times larger than Moon as seen from Earth. You fucking nazi paperclips. You are a shame for this planet. Former astronaut nazi Karen Nyberg Bitch reveals how NASA falsifies space flights https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/8BadTlEd8lTF Empire of LIES! https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/naxHReirDhXq Its funny how we've not been back to the moon in 50 years. https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/d5IznWwVk6nF Moon - The On Set Location. Old Studio Footage Including BUZZ Aldrin with Props & Scale Models https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/MZ7C1sxd6ZKz NASA's LAUGHABLE APOLLO LUNA LANDER https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/xfWVEkRsFDD1 I just can't wait buying a car like this when available. Russian Moskvich Brand Takes Over French Renault Plants In Moscow Providing 40,000 Jobs https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/EMRz4rmZFkUC
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-28 14:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <638532F8.7068@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #865308 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 11:07:21 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > I'm a starmaker, not a moviemaker. > > > > Have you ever in your entire life performed an experiment? > > Did you perform the first experimental > > measurement of God?? > > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > ... No AND NEITHER DID ALBERT EINSTEIN perform any experiments! Well, since you say you didn't "perform the first experimental measurement of God" yourself, (you had a 1000 monkeys do it for you).. let me add one more monkey, I think I figured out the measurement of God... I would have to say God is around 1080 inches tall...to 2 decimal point accuracy. Am I right? > Listen you aggravated F – – KWIT – I already told you a 1000 man PhD > academic army performed the experiments over 50 years worldwide > testing millions of people and they discovered the TOP EIGENVECTOR > In All of Psychology and named it the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology) > and because they're NOT PHYSICISTS – they don't know what it is – > and I proved IT'S THE GOD OF THE BIBLE controlled by this metric: > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE (highly curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > . > And any one of you half ass amateur science schmucks can plug that > into Mathematica or Maxima and show that the curvature is as large > As That of a Black Hole for chrissakes – – wake the fuck up !! > . > George -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-29 00:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6385C2A8.2216@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #865378 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 5:15:18 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > > > ... No AND NEITHER DID ALBERT EINSTEIN perform any experiments! > > > > > [STARMAKER] > > Well, since you say you didn't "perform the first experimental > > measurement of God" yourself, (you had a 1000 monkeys do it for you).. > > let me add one more monkey, I think I figured out the measurement of > > God... > > I would have to say God is around 1080 inches tall...to 2 decimal point > > accuracy. > > Am I right? > . > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > .... Listen you imbecilic moron – you don't have to be a genius to do > an experiment. My theory explains OPPOSITE PERSONALITIES by the > fact that there are 8–OPPOSING LOBES in the CUBICALLY CLEAVED brain. > .... Now I know you are never going to take 10 minutes to watch > my YouTube video explaining all this: – > . > WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD > ......... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk > ..............(YouTube 12-min) > . > So let me do a 5-SECOND EXPERIMENT which proves it: – > look at this PICTURE – > . > https://www.academia.edu/91823353/Document_251 > . > which shows a BOOK PARAGRAPH written in HEBREW on the > left-hand side – and a copy of the same paragraph > UPSIDE DOWN on the right-hand side of the picture. > . > Notice that HEBREW – UPSIDE DOWN looks exactly like NORWEGIAN, > or English or German or Swedish or any NORDIC LANGUAGE. > . > Now that is caused by the OPPOSITE PERSONALITIES caused by > the OPPOSITE BRAIN LOBES ruling those 2 opposite Personalities. > . > Now that experiment only takes 2 SECONDS > and it is a SIMPLE EXPERIMENTAL PROOF OF MY THEORY "THEORY"??? What theory? Do you mean "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD" is ...just a theory? > . > So much for friggin experiments !. > . > George but, but, you didn't mentioned my measurement of God, God is around 1080 inches tall...is that right¿ It simply not possible for God to be less than 1000 inches... so 1080 inches tall sounds right, is that correct¿ -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-29 17:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tm5h44$2af3k$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865393 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 3:28:19 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: >> but, but, you didn't mentioned my measurement of God, >> God is around 1080 inches tall...is that right¿ >> > [George E Hammond MS] > 1080 inches = 90 feet. Don't be ridiculous! No human being could > possibly be 90 feet tall.. > . > GOD IS A 100% FULLY GROWN HUMAN BEING . you are insignificant. You don't undrestand gases, liquids and pressure. You must be from america. Uneducated, old and lying.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-29 18:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tm5kk0$2anjs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865405 |
George Hammond wrote: > SNIIP SPAM you sure? These guys are blowing up energy pipelines for the continent, with huge bombs. They are not admitting it. what kind of *terrorist* are you, not admitting the catastrophe you committed, to serve you, and damage the continent? 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <efftard@donglemeier.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-29 12:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <tm5p0e$ckg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #865411 |
On 11/29/2022 10:56 AM, Bobby Spanò wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > >> SNIIP SPAM > What's wrong? Did your brain run low on oxygen when Donald Trump's ballsack became lodged in your windpipe?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Finis Mari <fmnf@isiifain.ii> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-29 21:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tm5so7$2b98m$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865411 |
Efftard K. Donglemeier wrote: > On 11/29/2022 10:56 AM, Bobby Spanò wrote: > > What's wrong? Did your brain run low on oxygen when Donald Trump's > ballsack became lodged in your windpipe? he just said you suck his dick. What is it you don't undrestand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-29 21:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tm5sfc$2b98m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #865405 |
George Hammond wrote: > SNIIP SPAM you guys should first agree in, whether it was a *_terrorist_attack_* or an accident. And whether Germany, France and Italy are dear friends and allies, or antagonistic to another evil enemies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-29 13:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63867A6B.9BE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #865393 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 3:28:19 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > but, but, you didn't mentioned my measurement of God, > > God is around 1080 inches tall...is that right¿ > > > [George E Hammond MS] > 1080 inches = 90 feet. Don't be ridiculous! No human being > could possibly be 90 feet tall.. > . > GOD IS A 100% FULLY GROWN HUMAN BEING > . > No human being has ever reached 100% full growth. > UNESCO, WHO etc. data indicates that the world average of > HUMAN GROWTH STUNTING is around 15%. > . > If everyone reached full 100% growth – then every > single person on earth would be "God in the flesh". > . > The average height of adult males the US is 5'9" tall. > Add 15% to that and you get 6'7" > so if God was an American – he would be 6'7" tall. > . > The average adult male Filipino is 5'3" > so of God was a Filipino he would be 6' tall > . > yawn > . > George But, my measurements of God was based before he first made man.. i figured He would want to be taller than a ...dinosaur. Otherwise the dinosaur would eat Him. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-30 16:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6387F522.1949@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #865393 |
Volney wrote: > > On 11/30/2022 4:23 PM, George Hammond wrote: > > SNIP ALIAS > > SNIP SPAM > > Why are you *still* unable to answer my simple questions? He is in search for, intelligent life on earth. > > Is basketball the sport of Mt. Olympus because it has many gods? > What godlike powers do some NBA players have, other than gobs of money? > > Was my coworker's son a Supergod? What godlike powers did he have? Does > he still have them? Or did they vanish when he left the Philippines? Why? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-02 21:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <638ADB2D.78D8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #865393 |
Volney wrote: > > On 11/30/2022 4:23 PM, George Hammond wrote: > > SNIP ALIAS > > SNIP SPAM > > Why are you *still* unable to answer my simple questions? > > Is basketball the sport of Mt. Olympus because it has many gods? > What godlike powers do some NBA players have, other than gobs of money? > > Was my coworker's son a Supergod? What godlike powers did he have? Does > he still have them? Or did they vanish when he left the Philippines? Why? Accoeding to the third person Hammond...God is 7 feet, 3 inches tall. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-18 23:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63A00EBA.7BA9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #865393 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 3:09:18 AM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > As George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis MA seems to have fallen into total > > incoherence -- not even bothering to say who he's replying to -- the > > time has come to ignore his posts completely. > > > > > CIA Submission Reference ID: XA4KQRLH > . > TO: – Director of the CIA, William J Burns > . > Dear Bill: – > I am a Physicist (MS 1967) and have made a scientific > discovery of importance to the security of the United States. > The intent of this letter is to inform you of this discovery. > . > I have also informed Dr. Nicholas J. S. Gibson, Ph.D. > Dir. of Human Sciences at the TEMPLETON FOUNDATION of this > discovery. > . > BELIEVE IT OR NOT this discovery consists of the world's first > bona fide, hard science, Scientific Proof of God, and I believe it > is of importance that the Central Intelligence Agency of the US > be among the very first to be informed of this discovery, as a > matter of National Security. > . > My letter to Dr. Gibson describing this discovery has been publicly > posted on the Internet and may be seen here: – > . > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa-jisc.exe?A2=PSY-REL-UK;e31fb2e6.2212 > . > I'm sure that I don't need to tell you of the lethargy, disinterest, > and general irresponsibility of the ivory tower intellectuals of > Academia – and it is my hope that the CIA are more realistic > and on their toes, when it comes to the political assessment of > unforeseen scientific discovery. > . > With my highest regards for the CIA, > . > George E Hammond You wrote: "BELIEVE IT OR NOT..", which means it does not matter if it is true or not, so it's okay to believe it or not. btw, what size shoes does God wear? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web