Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #864440 > unrolled thread

Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 22:04 -0800
    Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 12:00 -0800
      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 10:56 -0800
        Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-14 21:00 -0800
          Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-15 13:07 -0800
            Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 10:25 -0800
              Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 11:18 -0800
                Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jules Scotti <ujsl@ocjssuis.os> - 2022-11-19 15:08 +0000
                  Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 11:50 -0800
                    Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 15:57 -0800
                      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 11:32 -0800
                        Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 15:06 -0800
                        Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 19:53 -0800
                          Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 12:35 -0800
                            Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:03 -0800
                              Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:25 -0800
                                Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 14:50 +0000
                                Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 15:05 +0000
                                  Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 19:58 +0000
                                    Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:07 +0000
                                      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-11-25 14:35 -0800
                                      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:46 +0000
                                        Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:28 +0000
                                          Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:40 +0000
                                            Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 13:56 +0000
                                              Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 14:00 +0000
                                                Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 18:40 +0000
                                Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-25 20:07 -0800
                                  Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 19:14 +0000
                                  Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-28 14:15 -0800
                                    Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 00:28 -0800
                                      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 17:56 +0000
                                        Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 18:56 +0000
                                          Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <efftard@donglemeier.com> - 2022-11-29 12:10 -0800
                                          Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Finis Mari <fmnf@isiifain.ii> - 2022-11-29 21:14 +0000
                                        Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> - 2022-11-29 21:10 +0000
                                      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 13:32 -0800
                                      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-30 16:28 -0800
                                      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-02 21:14 -0800
                                    Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 14:00 -0800
                                      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 20:09 -0800

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#865303

In sci.physics Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
> 
>> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 2:58:30 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote:
>>> George Hammond wrote:
>>> 
>>> > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro
>>> > wrote:
>>> > [George Hammond MS physics]
>>> > Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this
>>> > thread George .
>> .
>> [Micheal Agnelli]
>>> real bombs, as those used by your shithole of a country, destroying
>>> energy pipelines  to an entire continent.
>> .
>> [George Hammond MS physics USA]
>> .... Listen you technical flunky moron – the Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT
>> DEEP!
>> There are thousands of fishing boats with fish finding depth sounder
>> ONBOARD SONAR  that could EASILY locate that 3 foot diameter concrete
> 
> old and lying, piss off. Can't believe it, 80 years old and still lying. 
> It required stronger bombs than Hiroshima, fucking stupid. Under water you 
> need stronger bombs, plus, that a bed of strong concrete were to be blown 
> into pieces likewise, as I understood. Learn Physics from a school, you 
> idiot, not from internet and wikipedia. A normal bomb under water pressure 
> is *NOTHING*. You fucking uneducated idiot.

Yeah, right, depth charges with only a couple hundred pounds of
conventional explosives have never destroyed a submarine through
hydraulic shock...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865304

George Hammond wrote:

> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:07:55 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote:
>> old and lying, piss off. Can't believe it, 80 years old and still 
lying.
>> It required stronger bombs than Hiroshima, fucking stupid. Under water
>> you need stronger bombs, plus, that a bed of strong concrete were to be
>> blown into pieces likewise, as I understood. Learn Physics from a
>> school, you idiot, not from internet and wikipedia. A normal bomb under
>> water pressure
> .
> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] My CV is: –
> CURRICULUM VITAE GEORGE E. HAMMOND B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester
> Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern
> University, Boston MA, USA Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in
> Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA.

nothing. Zeroo. I said *stronger*, not nuclear, fucking stupid. You don't 
know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb to explode under water 
pressure.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865305

George Hammond wrote:

> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:46:28 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote:
>> You don't > know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb to explode
>> under water  pressure.
> .
> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> ... You don't know what you're talking about –
>  I have 2-/2 college degrees in physics.
> .
> The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is
> only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires!  That's
> nuthin !

that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high 
viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865306

George Hammond wrote:

> SNIP SPAM

amazing, the proven crackpot uneducated troll, decays to "spam". I'm 
obliged to insist.

George Hammond wrote:

> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:46:28 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote:
>> You don't > know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb to explode
>> under water  pressure.
> .
> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> ... You don't know what you're talking about –
>  I have 2-/2 college degrees in physics.
> .
> The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is
> only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires!  That's
> nuthin !

that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high
viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865312 — Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God

uneducated crackpot George Hammond wrote:

> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:40:17 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote:
> .
> [George Hammond MS physics]
> you obviously have no scientific credentials and little or no scientific
> competence – I have 2 degrees in physics.
> .... Your statements are scientifically IRRELEVANT and RIDICULOUS.
> SNIP SPAM .

you can wipe your stupid ass with your "degrees". Avoiding 
*re_quoting_yourself*, equating *air* to an *INCOMPREHENSIBLE* and high 
viscosity liquid, as *water_under_high_pressure* you fucking idiot. How 
would you explain that, you stupid crackpot.

Allow me to specify, for the newcomers, to see, the stupid you are.

______
> The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is
> only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires!  That's
> nuthin !

that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high
viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid.
_______

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865313 — Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God

Micheal Agnelli wrote:

> uneducated crackpot George Hammond wrote:
> 
>> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:40:17 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli
>> wrote:
>> .
>> [George Hammond MS physics]
>> you obviously have no scientific credentials and little or no
>> scientific competence – I have 2 degrees in physics.
>> .... Your statements are scientifically IRRELEVANT and RIDICULOUS.
>> SNIP SPAM .
> 
> you can wipe your stupid ass with your "degrees". Avoiding
> *re_quoting_yourself*, equating *air* to an *INCOMPREHENSIBLE* and high

*INCOMPRESSIBLE*.

> viscosity liquid, as *water_under_high_pressure* you fucking idiot. How
> would you explain that, you stupid crackpot.
> 
> Allow me to specify, for the newcomers, to see, the stupid you are.
> 
> ______
>> The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is
>> only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires!  That's
>> nuthin !
> 
> that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high
> viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid.
> _______

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865316 — Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God

uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth:

>> > that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high
>> > viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid.
> ..
> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> CURRICULUM VITAE B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
> Worcester MA, USA M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA,
> USA Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern
> U..Boston MA.

worthless piece of toilet paper, you fucking janitor.

> And furthermore MORON – a surplus World War II submarine depth charge
> can be bought on the underground Arms black-market for probably a couple
> of grand at the most. It is capable of easily collapsing the PRESSURE
> HULL of a submarine never mind a flimsy "gas pipeline".
> ... YOU'RE   SCIENTIFICALLY  STUPID ... GET OUTTA  HEAH George

fucking cretin, proving once again your imbecility. Gas under 
*_high_pressure_*, in the pipes. Which adds to the necessary strength of 
the detonation, recorded as an *_earthquake_*. Three days (3) of gas 
eruption, you inbreed idiot.

a diploma from cacamerica is NOTHING in europe. Fake manned moon landing 
and such. If you want a proper moon landing, you go to Russia and China. 
And India, as I can see. Proofs:

https://www.google.com/search?q=nord+stream-explosion&tbm=isch&source=lnms

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865308

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:24:47 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > [STARMAKER]
> > > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond.
> > > "Fortunately for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific
> > > explanation..."
> > > Who is this other guy you call Hammond?
> > >
> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> .... Cut the bullshit Starmaker – you're supposed to know about writing
> in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd PERSON by the time you're  outta the 6th grade.
> .
> LISTEN – I GOT AN IDEA !  I'm thinking about making a NETFLIX MOVIE
> about the "WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD".
> .
> Publishing a paper, writing a book, making a YouTube video – are USELESS –
> and the chances of getting it on TELEVISION are zilch. Sosomeone suggested
> "MAKE A NETFLIX MOVIE" – – – – AND I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA
> .
> Do you know anything about NETFLIX ?
> .
> George

I'm a starmaker, not a moviemaker.


Have you ever in your entire life performed an experiment? Did you performed the first experimental
measurement of God??









   

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865317

George Hammond wrote:

> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> ... No AND NEITHER DID ALBERT EINSTEIN perform any experiments!
> Listen you aggravated F – – KWIT – I already told you a 1000 man PhD
> academic army performed the experiments over 50 years worldwide testing
> millions of people and they discovered the TOP EIGENVECTOR In All of
> Psychology and named it the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology) and
> because

nothing. Idiocies. Here you have faking a nazi flag on moon, forgetting 
the Earth, 66⁰ above the horizon, 4 times larger than Moon as seen from 
Earth. You fucking nazi paperclips. You are a shame for this planet.

Former astronaut nazi Karen Nyberg Bitch reveals how NASA falsifies space 
flights https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/8BadTlEd8lTF

Empire of LIES! 
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/naxHReirDhXq

Its funny how we've not been back to the moon in 50 years. 
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/d5IznWwVk6nF

Moon - The On Set Location. Old Studio Footage Including BUZZ Aldrin with 
Props & Scale Models 
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/MZ7C1sxd6ZKz

NASA's LAUGHABLE APOLLO LUNA LANDER 
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/xfWVEkRsFDD1

I just can't wait buying a car like this when available.

Russian Moskvich Brand Takes Over French Renault Plants In Moscow 
Providing 40,000 Jobs
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/EMRz4rmZFkUC

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865378

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 11:07:21 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I'm a starmaker, not a moviemaker.
> >
> > Have you ever in your entire life performed an experiment?
> > Did you perform the first experimental
> > measurement of God??
> >
> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> ... No AND NEITHER DID ALBERT EINSTEIN perform any experiments!




Well, since you say you didn't "perform the first experimental
measurement of God" yourself, (you had a 1000 monkeys do it for you).. 

let me add one more monkey, I think I figured out the measurement of
God...

I would have to say God is around 1080 inches tall...to 2 decimal point
accuracy.


Am I right?


> Listen you aggravated F – – KWIT – I already told you a 1000 man PhD
> academic army performed the experiments over 50 years worldwide
> testing millions of people and they discovered the TOP EIGENVECTOR
> In All of Psychology and named it the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology)
> and because they're NOT PHYSICISTS – they don't know what it is –
> and I proved IT'S THE GOD OF THE BIBLE controlled by this metric:
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE (highly curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> And any one of you half ass amateur science schmucks can plug that
> into Mathematica or Maxima and show that the curvature is as large
> As That of a Black Hole for chrissakes – – wake the fuck up  !!
> .
> George

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865393

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 5:15:18 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> > > ... No AND NEITHER DID ALBERT EINSTEIN perform any experiments!
> > >
> > [STARMAKER]
> > Well, since you say you didn't "perform the first experimental
> > measurement of God" yourself, (you had a 1000 monkeys do it for you)..
> > let me add one more monkey, I think I figured out the measurement of
> > God...
> > I would have to say God is around 1080 inches tall...to 2 decimal point
> > accuracy.
> > Am I right?
> .
> [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> .... Listen you imbecilic moron – you don't have to be a genius to do
> an experiment.  My theory explains OPPOSITE PERSONALITIES by the
> fact that there are 8–OPPOSING LOBES in the CUBICALLY CLEAVED brain.
> .... Now I know you are never going to take 10 minutes to watch
> my YouTube video explaining all this: –
> .
> WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> ......... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
>  ..............(YouTube 12-min)
> .
> So let me do a 5-SECOND EXPERIMENT which proves it: –
> look at this PICTURE –
> .
> https://www.academia.edu/91823353/Document_251
> .
>  which shows a BOOK PARAGRAPH written in HEBREW on the
>  left-hand side – and a copy of the same paragraph
> UPSIDE DOWN on the right-hand side of the picture.
> .
> Notice that HEBREW – UPSIDE DOWN looks exactly like NORWEGIAN,
> or English or German or Swedish or any NORDIC LANGUAGE.
> .
> Now that is caused by the OPPOSITE PERSONALITIES caused by
> the OPPOSITE BRAIN LOBES ruling those 2 opposite Personalities.
> .
> Now that experiment only takes 2 SECONDS
> and it is a SIMPLE EXPERIMENTAL PROOF OF MY THEORY

"THEORY"??? What theory? Do you mean "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD" is
...just a theory?

> .
> So much for friggin experiments !.
> .
> George



but, but, you didn't mentioned my measurement of God,
God is around 1080 inches tall...is that right¿

It simply not possible for God to be less than 1000 inches...

so 1080 inches tall sounds right, is that correct¿

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865405

George Hammond wrote:

> On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 3:28:19 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>> but, but, you didn't mentioned my measurement of God,
>> God is around 1080 inches tall...is that right¿
>> 
> [George E Hammond MS]
> 1080 inches = 90 feet.   Don't be ridiculous! No human being could
> possibly be 90 feet tall..
> .
> GOD IS A 100% FULLY GROWN HUMAN BEING .

you are insignificant. You don't undrestand gases, liquids and pressure. 
You must be from america. Uneducated, old and lying.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865411

George Hammond wrote:

> SNIIP SPAM

you sure? These guys are blowing up energy pipelines for the continent, 
with huge bombs. They are not admitting it. 

what kind of *terrorist* are you, not admitting the catastrophe you 
committed, to serve you, and damage the continent?


🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865415

On 11/29/2022 10:56 AM, Bobby Spanò wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
> 
>> SNIIP SPAM
> 

What's wrong? Did your brain run low on oxygen when Donald Trump's 
ballsack became lodged in your windpipe?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865418

Efftard K. Donglemeier wrote:

> On 11/29/2022 10:56 AM, Bobby Spanò wrote:
> 
> What's wrong? Did your brain run low on oxygen when Donald Trump's
> ballsack became lodged in your windpipe?

he just said you suck his dick. What is it you don't undrestand.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865417

George Hammond wrote:

> SNIIP SPAM

you guys should first agree in, whether it was a *_terrorist_attack_* or 
an accident. And whether Germany, France and Italy are dear friends and 
allies, or antagonistic to another evil enemies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865419

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 3:28:19 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > but, but, you didn't mentioned my measurement of God,
> > God is around 1080 inches tall...is that right¿
> >
> [George E Hammond MS]
> 1080 inches = 90 feet.   Don't be ridiculous! No human being
> could possibly be 90 feet tall..
> .
> GOD IS A 100% FULLY GROWN HUMAN BEING
> .
> No human being has ever reached 100% full growth.
> UNESCO, WHO etc. data indicates that the world average of
> HUMAN GROWTH STUNTING is around 15%.
> .
> If everyone reached full 100% growth – then every
> single person on earth would be "God in the flesh".
> .
> The average height of adult males the US is 5'9" tall.
> Add 15% to that and you get 6'7"
> so if God was an American – he would be 6'7" tall.
> .
> The average adult male Filipino is 5'3"
> so of God was a Filipino he would be 6' tall
> .
> yawn
> .
> George

But, my measurements of God was based before he first made man..

i figured He would want to be taller than a ...dinosaur.


Otherwise the dinosaur would eat Him.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865472

Volney wrote:
> 
> On 11/30/2022 4:23 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > SNIP ALIAS
> > SNIP SPAM
> 
> Why are you *still* unable to answer my simple questions?


He is in search for, intelligent life on earth. 



> 
> Is basketball the sport of Mt. Olympus because it has many gods?
> What godlike powers do some NBA players have, other than gobs of money?
> 
> Was my coworker's son a Supergod? What godlike powers did he have? Does
> he still have them? Or did they vanish when he left the Philippines? Why?







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865536

Volney wrote:
> 
> On 11/30/2022 4:23 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > SNIP ALIAS
> > SNIP SPAM
> 
> Why are you *still* unable to answer my simple questions?
> 
> Is basketball the sport of Mt. Olympus because it has many gods?
> What godlike powers do some NBA players have, other than gobs of money?
> 
> Was my coworker's son a Supergod? What godlike powers did he have? Does
> he still have them? Or did they vanish when he left the Philippines? Why?



Accoeding to the third person Hammond...God is 7 feet, 3 inches tall.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#865421

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 5:15:18 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> > > ... No AND NEITHER DID ALBERT EINSTEIN perform any experiments!
> > >
> > [STARMAKER]
> > Well, since you say you didn't "perform the first experimental
> > measurement of God" yourself, (you had a 1000 monkeys do it for you)..
> > let me add one more monkey, I think I figured out the measurement of
> > God...
> > I would have to say God is around 1080 inches tall...to 2 decimal point
> > accuracy.
> > Am I right?
> .
> [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> .... Listen you imbecilic moron – you don't have to be a genius to do
> an experiment.  My theory explains OPPOSITE PERSONALITIES by the
> fact that there are 8–OPPOSING LOBES in the CUBICALLY CLEAVED brain.
> .... Now I know you are never going to take 10 minutes to watch
> my YouTube video explaining all this: –
> .
> WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> ......... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
>  ..............(YouTube 12-min)

Maybe you don't understand the marketplace...

If you yourself haven't read all the God Bible, and
Christians who believe the bible is the Word of God but haven't read the whole bible either...
why would ANYONE want to see a Youtube video about God???¿


You're looking for stupid people, not PHD's.

Someone stupid enough to read a WHOLE Bible!!!


You need to talk to those people who stand at street corners with a bible in their hand and,
and, ...forget it...they probably haven't read it either!

How did you get a thousand monkeys to do that????



 


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web