Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #829857 > unrolled thread

Einstein Lied Again

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2021-08-06 14:09 -0700
Last post2021-12-02 11:42 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 154 — 18 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 14:09 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 15:49 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-06 16:10 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 18:03 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 18:17 -0700
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-12 09:04 -0700
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 11:32 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 11:57 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 12:45 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:09 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:16 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:25 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:34 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:56 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-03 12:31 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 11:57 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 16:17 -0800
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 13:21 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-13 12:17 -0800
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-15 01:30 -0800
                      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 14:33 -0800
                        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 19:55 -0800
                          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 20:07 -0800
                            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 16:28 -0800
                          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 21:59 -0800
                            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:14 -0800
                              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:24 -0800
                                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 11:11 -0800
                        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-20 10:54 -0800
                          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 11:37 -0800
                            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 13:24 -0800
                              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-23 21:59 -0800
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 15:06 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-01 17:37 -0600
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 21:44 -0800
                      Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 08:36 -0600
                        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:15 -0800
                          Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:32 -0600
                        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:23 -0800
                          Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:40 -0600
                            Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:47 -0600
                              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 12:32 -0800
                                Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 17:39 -0600
                                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 20:55 -0800
                                    Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 09:12 -0600
                                      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 09:33 -0800
                                        Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 19:18 -0600
                                      Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-12-03 10:24 -0800
                                        Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 10:36 -0800
                                        Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 19:32 -0600
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:30 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-14 23:58 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-11-05 07:30 +0100
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 21:09 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-04 12:07 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-05 12:11 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 14:14 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-05 14:55 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 15:55 -0700
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 16:31 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-09 22:14 -0700
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 15:10 -0700
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 11:44 -0700
                      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:19 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:37 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-02 21:36 -0700
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-05 10:33 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-06 17:01 +0000
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 11:03 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-13 19:05 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 00:45 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 02:04 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-19 15:53 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-10-09 15:58 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-05 21:51 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-13 22:08 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-22 01:05 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-12-07 18:45 +0000
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 15:50 -0800
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-01-10 22:58 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-01-25 22:24 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-11 19:11 +0000
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-02-11 11:22 -0800
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-15 04:39 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-16 16:44 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2022-02-17 00:15 +0000
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-17 23:39 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-01-21 14:30 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-01 11:52 -0800
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-09 22:30 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 10:45 -0800
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-10 21:22 -0800
                      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 13:42 -0800
                        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-11 15:07 -0800
    Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 17:53 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 02:11 +0000
        Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:29 +0200
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 00:03 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-07 11:03 -0500
          Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 11:26 -0700
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 11:35 -0700
          Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:38 +0200
            Re: Lies about Einstein Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:53 +0200
              Re: Lies about Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:29 -0700
            Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:26 -0700
              Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:28 -0700
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:29 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-10 03:03 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-09 23:27 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 21:28 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 14:37 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-09-12 17:08 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-30 18:46 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-30 20:27 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 18:12 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-04 13:30 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-13 22:09 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-21 22:09 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 18:28 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-29 22:01 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-04 16:55 +0000
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 01:32 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:21 +0200
    Re: Einstein Lied Again Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 02:54 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:48 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 11:30 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:16 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 16:42 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:50 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:19 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again Jonathan <writeInstead@Gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 20:19 -0400
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-09 13:58 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:44 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-09 11:13 -0700
    Never heared of that He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 11:11 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 14:38 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-23 10:44 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-10-11 02:40 +0000
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-03 15:32 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-05 02:41 -0400
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-08 20:56 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-08 15:29 -0600
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 14:57 -0800
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-13 15:04 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-13 15:29 -0800
        Re: Einstein Lied Again James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 11:40 -0800
          Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-21 11:54 -0800
            Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-21 12:04 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-21 13:22 -0800
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-28 04:28 +0000
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-29 21:29 +0000
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 11:42 -0800

Page 1 of 8  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

#829857 — Einstein Lied Again

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-08-06 14:09 -0700
SubjectEinstein Lied Again
Message-ID<610DA51D.680B@ix.netcom.com>
Einstein Lied Again
by The Starmaker

(excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb)


Most of yous already read or heard about
The letter that launched the arms race.
(written and signed by Albert Einstein)

Here is a copy of that first letter.
https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first

In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter:

"Sir:

      Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com-

municated to me in manuscript,..."


I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph.


But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them??


https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first






                                             Albert Einstein
                                             Old Grove Rd.
                                             Nassau Point
                                             Peconic, Long Island

                                             August 2nd 1939

F.D. Roosevelt
President of the United States
White House
Washington, D.C.



Sir:

      Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com-

municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran-

ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im-

mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem

to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part

of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring

to your attention the following facts and recommendations:

      In the course of the last four months it has been made probable -

through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in

America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction

in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant-

ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears

almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.

      This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,

and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-

ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this

type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy

the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,

such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by

air.




                                 -2-

      The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate

quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia.

while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo.

      In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more

permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group

of physicists  working on chain reactions in America. One possible way

of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person

who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial

capacity. His task might comprise the following:

      a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the

further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action,

giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran-

ium ore for the United States;

      b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car-

ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by

providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y

private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause,

and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories

which have the necessary equipment.

      I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium

from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should

have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground

that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is

attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the

American work on uranium is now being repeated.

                                            Yours very truly,
                                             signature
                                            (Albert Einstein)











-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#829870

FromSiri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Date2021-08-06 15:49 -0700
Message-ID<chine.bleu-E39053.15494906082021@reader.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#829857
In article <610DA51D.680B@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter:

You do know he didn't write the letter, don't you?

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.    @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                                    /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post         / \
I am an Andrea Doria sockpuppet.                  insults Islam.  Mohammed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#829873

FromJim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date2021-08-06 16:10 -0700
Message-ID<e3s0uh-0vj.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to#829870
In sci.physics Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <610DA51D.680B@ix.netcom.com>,
>  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
>> In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter:
> 
> You do know he didn't write the letter, don't you?
> 

Not a snowball's chance in Hell...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#829876

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-08-06 18:03 -0700
Message-ID<610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#829870
Siri Cruise wrote:
> 
> In article <610DA51D.680B@ix.netcom.com>,
>  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> > In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter:
> 
> You do know he didn't write the letter, don't you?


Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat they did in those days)


and here he wrote: "I am sending the present letter to Dr. L. Szilard with whom I am personally aquainted with the request of forwarding the letter to your office..."


Here is documented proof of that...
https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1309732171188330496/photo/1



But I'm not sure if he actually licked the enevelope and the stamp...



So, you could say : "You do know he didn't lick the stamp, don't you?"













-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#829878

FromSiri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Date2021-08-06 18:17 -0700
Message-ID<chine.bleu-B7740C.18172406082021@reader.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#829876
In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat 
> they did in those 

Still wrong.

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.    @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                                    /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post         / \
I am an Andrea Doria sockpuppet.                  insults Islam.  Mohammed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830243

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-08-12 09:04 -0700
Message-ID<pghahghnoc2bgrhr75p47mbv3di7gf6m5n@4ax.com>
In reply to#829878
On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat 
>> they did in those 
>
>Still wrong.


So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
and he tells her..

"Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"

She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"

He looks at it...(then does a spell check)

Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.

He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
begins with a S and small z, ..."

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1




So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...


https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2


Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"


She tells him..."You're the bomb!"          
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830471

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-08-14 11:32 -0700
Message-ID<61180C25.631@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#830243
Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?

I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.

The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> >> they did in those
> >
> >Still wrong.
> 
> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> and he tells her..
> 
> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> 
> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> 
> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> 
> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> 
> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> 
> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> 
> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> 
> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830473

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-14 11:57 -0700
Message-ID<38246f50-b972-49ff-a7f6-106b4fbf88d3n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#830471
Japan had to be controlled or more lives would have been lost instead...
They converted to our good and are now a close ally.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830479

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-08-14 12:45 -0700
Message-ID<61181D3C.1B54@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#830473
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Japan had to be controlled or more lives would have been lost instead...
> They converted to our good and are now a close ally.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch



dats not how it went..

The USA dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, and

when the Russians saw what happened..the Russians decided they were
going to take over what was left of Japan.


Opportunity.

So, Japan surrended to USA for protection instead of surrerdering to
Russia.


animals going after the crumbs.


whoever takes it gets it.





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830489

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-14 17:09 -0700
Message-ID<ccaede06-fc9b-40cb-81d3-c50e5acb8372n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#830479
On Saturday, August 14, 2021 at 12:44:38 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > 
> > Japan had to be controlled or more lives would have been lost instead... 
> > They converted to our good and are now a close ally. 
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> dats not how it went.. 
> 

Sure it was. Japan would have been a worse problem.
Even to itself...
it was good for them to be crushed in the different way...
They are better for being converted to our good.
They got past their emperor to our freedom...

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830484

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-08-14 15:16 -0700
Message-ID<611840BE.1A75@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#830471
Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, August 14, 2021 at 11:31:43 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> 
> No, not right. Einstein himself said... “My participation in the production of the atom bomb consisted in a single act: I signed a letter to President Roosevelt.”



Okay, since many years has passed...here is the definition of : the atomic age

the atomic age;
the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb 
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/atomic-age


The Atomic Age, 
also known as the Atomic Era, is the period of history following the detonation of the first nuclear weapon,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_Age


It reads right here on the cover of Newsweek magazine, "Einstein: Godfather of the Atomic Age"
https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1426663555877654530/photo/1


the atomic age;
the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb 
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/atomic-age


Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb!

(the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb) 




https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1426663555877654530/photo/2










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830485

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-08-14 15:25 -0700
Message-ID<611842DE.1866@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#830484
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Paul Alsing wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, August 14, 2021 at 11:31:43 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > > The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> >
> > No, not right. Einstein himself said... “My participation in the production of the atom bomb consisted in a single act: I signed a letter to President Roosevelt.”
> 
> Okay, since many years has passed...here is the definition of : the atomic age
> 
> the atomic age;
> the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb
> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/atomic-age
> 
> The Atomic Age,
> also known as the Atomic Era, is the period of history following the detonation of the first nuclear weapon,
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_Age
> 
> It reads right here on the cover of Newsweek magazine, "Einstein: Godfather of the Atomic Age"
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1426663555877654530/photo/1
> 
> the atomic age;
> the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb
> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/atomic-age
> 
> Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb!
> 
> (the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb)
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1426663555877654530/photo/2



In 1905 Albert Einstein did clearly state that mass and energy were equivalent and 
suggested that proof of this equivalence might be found by the study of radioactive substances. 
He concluded that the amount of energy, E, equivalent to a mass, m, was given by the equation

E = mc2

where c is the velocity of light.  

It shows that one kilogram (2.2 pounds) of matter, if converted entirely into energy, would give
 25 billion kilowatt hours of energy. This is equal to the energy that would be generated by the 
total electric power industry in the United States 


https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1426663555877654530/photo/2








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#831230

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-08-26 11:34 -0700
Message-ID<thnfigdrq7mvf5di22nqpv1gpbo244hc3n@4ax.com>
In reply to#830485
Now, you can clearly see on this cover of Time magazine
Albert Einstein, the atomic bomb and...E=Mc^2.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E8yF_o9VkAIfo2b?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1426663555877654530/photo/2


but, but..if you ask any scientist, they will *ALL* tell you 
E=Mc^2 has nothing to do with the atomic bomb.

Are *ALL* of these scientist Lying, or are they just all Stupid????

or both?


On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 15:25:34 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> Paul Alsing wrote:
>> >
>> > On Saturday, August 14, 2021 at 11:31:43 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > > The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
>> >
>> > No, not right. Einstein himself said... “My participation in the production of the atom bomb consisted in a single act: I signed a letter to President Roosevelt.�
>> 
>> Okay, since many years has passed...here is the definition of : the atomic age
>> 
>> the atomic age;
>> the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb
>> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/atomic-age
>> 
>> The Atomic Age,
>> also known as the Atomic Era, is the period of history following the detonation of the first nuclear weapon,
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_Age
>> 
>> It reads right here on the cover of Newsweek magazine, "Einstein: Godfather of the Atomic Age"
>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1426663555877654530/photo/1
>> 
>> the atomic age;
>> the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb
>> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/atomic-age
>> 
>> Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb!
>> 
>> (the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb)
>> 
>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1426663555877654530/photo/2
>
>
>
>In 1905 Albert Einstein did clearly state that mass and energy were equivalent and 
>suggested that proof of this equivalence might be found by the study of radioactive substances. 
>He concluded that the amount of energy, E, equivalent to a mass, m, was given by the equation
>
>E = mc2
>
>where c is the velocity of light.  
>
>It shows that one kilogram (2.2 pounds) of matter, if converted entirely into energy, would give
> 25 billion kilowatt hours of energy. This is equal to the energy that would be generated by the 
>total electric power industry in the United States 
>
>
>https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1426663555877654530/photo/2
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830490

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2021-08-14 17:56 -0700
Message-ID<36c62cf5-d1c4-4db4-8b0a-5f7bde26770dn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#830484
On Saturday, August 14, 2021 at 3:16:06 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Paul Alsing wrote:
> > 
> > On Saturday, August 14, 2021 at 11:31:43 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > 
> > > The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right???? 
> >
> > No, not right. Einstein himself said... “My participation in the production of the atom bomb consisted in a single act: I signed a letter to President Roosevelt.” 

> Okay, since many years has passed...here is the definition of : the atomic age 
> 
> the atomic age; the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb 

> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/atomic-age  

You, of course, snipped the most important part of that definition... "the atomic age: the period in history initiated by the first use of the atomic bomb and characterized by atomic energy as a military, political, and industrial factor."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834997

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-11-03 12:31 -0700
Message-ID<p7o5og9ij1fjikjefplvmaul2m050je9b0@4ax.com>
In reply to#830471
The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...

How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
test? 

Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
hand!


Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.





Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
Torpedo explosion...

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546

Page 1
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
Page 2
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


https://twitter.com/Starmaker111








On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
>
>I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
>
>The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
>
>
>
>
>The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
>> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
>> >> they did in those
>> >
>> >Still wrong.
>> 
>> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
>> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
>> and he tells her..
>> 
>> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
>> 
>> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
>> 
>> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
>> 
>> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
>> 
>> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
>> begins with a S and small z, ..."
>> 
>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
>> 
>> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
>> 
>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
>> 
>> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
>> 
>> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
>> --
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>>  the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835236

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-11-07 11:57 -0800
Message-ID<61882FC7.14AD@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#834997
furthermore, what about a) and b)?

https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first

a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."


and 

b)  b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..

'which is at present' 

being carried on

 within the University laboratories. 





Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.


What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
the United States President???? 


b) *to speed up the experimental

His own little private manhattan project?


Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.



In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg


He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.












The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> 
> How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> test?
> 
> Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> hand!
> 
> Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> 
> Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> Torpedo explosion...
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> 
> Page 1
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> Page 2
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> 
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> >
> >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> >
> >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> >> >> they did in those
> >> >
> >> >Still wrong.
> >>
> >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> >> and he tells her..
> >>
> >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> >>
> >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> >>
> >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> >>
> >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> >>
> >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> >>
> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> >>
> >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> >>
> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> >>
> >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> >>
> >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> >> --
> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >>  the unchallengeable.
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835262

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-11-07 16:17 -0800
Message-ID<61886CA4.5A9B@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#835236
IMAGINE all the students who attended these Universities
in which atomic bombs experimental work were
being carried on within these University laboratories
at that time.


How many students were exposed to Uranium radiation,
and died from it *not knowing why) besides everyone who died working at
the
Manhattan project. Even Albert Einstein died from Uranium radiation!

The horror, the horror, the horror...





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> 
> and
> 
> b)  b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> 
> 'which is at present'
> 
> being carried on
> 
>  within the University laboratories.
> 
> Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> 
> What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> the United States President????
> 
> b) *to speed up the experimental
> 
> His own little private manhattan project?
> 
> Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> 
> In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> 
> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> 
> He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> >
> > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > test?
> >
> > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > hand!
> >
> > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> >
> > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > Torpedo explosion...
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> >
> > Page 1
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > Page 2
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> >
> > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > >
> > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > >
> > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > >> >> they did in those
> > >> >
> > >> >Still wrong.
> > >>
> > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > >> and he tells her..
> > >>
> > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > >>
> > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > >>
> > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > >>
> > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > >>
> > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > >>
> > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > >>
> > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > >>
> > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > >>
> > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > >>
> > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > >> --
> > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835328

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-11-08 13:21 -0800
Message-ID<618994F6.773E@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#835262
Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 7, 2021 at 9:17:39 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> IMAGINE all the students who attended these Universities
> >> in which atomic bombs experimental work were
> >> being carried on within these University laboratories
> >> at that time.
> >>
> >>
> >> How many students were exposed to Uranium radiation,
> >> and died from it *not knowing why) besides everyone who died working at
> >> the
> >> Manhattan project. Even Albert Einstein died from Uranium radiation!
> >>
> >> The horror, the horror, the horror...
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> >>>
> >>> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> >>>
> >>> a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> >>>
> >>> and
> >>>
> >>> b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> >>>
> >>> 'which is at present'
> >>>
> >>> being carried on
> >>>
> >>> within the University laboratories.
> >>>
> >>> Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> >>>
> >>> What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> >>> the United States President????
> >>>
> >>> b) *to speed up the experimental
> >>>
> >>> His own little private manhattan project?
> >>>
> >>> Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to
> >>> just...test this theory.
> >>>
> >>> In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> >>> the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> >>> an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> >>>
> >>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> >>>
> >>> He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the
> >>> scientific community.
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> >>>>
> >>>> How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> >>>> test?
> >>>>
> >>>> Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> >>>> short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> >>>> hand!
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> >>>> of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> >>>>
> >>>> Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> >>>> suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> >>>> for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> >>>> Torpedo explosion...
> >>>>
> >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> >>>>
> >>>> Page 1
> >>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >>>> Page 2
> >>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >>>>
> >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> >>>> <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb,
> >>>>> ...isn't that Right????
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <610DDB...@ix.netcom.com>,
> >>>>>>> The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> >>>>>>>> they did in those
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Still wrong.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> >>>>>> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> >>>>>> and he tells her..
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> >>>>>> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >>>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >>>>>> the unchallengeable.
> >>>> --
> >>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >>>> the unchallengeable.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >>> the unchallengeable.
> >>
> >> --
> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> >> and challenge
> >> the unchallengeable.
> >
> > Enrico Fermi died from cancer on November 28, 1954, after years of
> > exposure between 1941 and 1946? (nuclear pile work).
> > He was a "hands on" person, as well as theoretical physicist.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi
> >
> > From June 2 to 4, 1947, the first international physics conference after
> > World War II was held at Shelter Island.
> > The conference brought together 24 physicists from the Manhattan Project, including:
> >
> > Bethe
> > Bohm
> > Breit
> > Feynman
> > Kramers,
> > Lamb
> > von Neumann
> > Pauling
> > Rabi
> > Schwinger
> > Teller
> > Uhlenbeck
> > Weisskopf
> > Wheeler
> > Oppenheimer
> >
> > All of these scumbags (they were willingly working on a genocidal project)
> 
> Several nations, Germany, Japan, and the US, were all working on a
> “genocidal project”. The one that finished it first was in the best
> position to end the war quickly, which in fact happened. I’m whether you’d
> have preferred that one of the other nations complete the work first, and
> whether this would have removed the satin from these men’s work? I also
> note that you did not mention the people who created and deployed napalm in
> WWII, which caused far more death that the two atomic bombs combined, and
> which was also used in the Korean and Vietnam wars to even greater
> devastation.

> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables


Japan, Korea, Vietnam...U.S.A. loves to kill  CHINKS! This time it's CHINA  time for usa get some chink ass.


I'm sure China's leaders are asking, "Why are those white people always killing chinks????"


The United States should use mock up of chineese laundries as target practice.


no tickkee no shirtee

fish face

Nuke those chinks back to the fish age....








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835604

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-11-13 12:17 -0800
Message-ID<61901D54.8B7@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#835236
Another... Einstein Lied Again

is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..


https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first


"In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more

permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group

of physicists  working on chain reactions in America."

(between the Administration and the group

of physicists)

"One possible way

of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person

who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial

capacity."


("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")

"His task might comprise the following:"

(now i know it's a guy!)


"to approach Government Departments,"
"keep them informed of the further development"
"put forward recommendations for Government action"
"giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
"to speed up the experimental work"
"providing funds"
"through his contacts with private persons"
"obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"


Who is this masked man????

Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.


"inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)

Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.


Who else...Leo Szilard.



Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
indication of who that person might be with words like:

"a person who has your confidence"

but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:

"and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial

capacity."




So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.


Einstein Lied Again.


Only Einstein can lie like that.





oh, did you see the draft?

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> 
> and
> 
> b)  b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> 
> 'which is at present'
> 
> being carried on
> 
>  within the University laboratories.
> 
> Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> 
> What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> the United States President????
> 
> b) *to speed up the experimental
> 
> His own little private manhattan project?
> 
> Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> 
> In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> 
> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> 
> He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> >
> > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > test?
> >
> > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > hand!
> >
> > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> >
> > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > Torpedo explosion...
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> >
> > Page 1
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > Page 2
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> >
> > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > >
> > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > >
> > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > >> >> they did in those
> > >> >
> > >> >Still wrong.
> > >>
> > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > >> and he tells her..
> > >>
> > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > >>
> > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > >>
> > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > >>
> > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > >>
> > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > >>
> > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > >>
> > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > >>
> > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > >>
> > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > >>
> > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > >> --
> > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835769

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-11-15 01:30 -0800
Message-ID<619228C9.1B17@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#835604
As I mentioned before..

Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
months earilier...

and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..

one other method I didn't mentioned was
passing information to the russians with...
comic books...

This was published before
they dropped the bomb on Japan..

"“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT. 
Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
“I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
“Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable 
energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw, 
compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence 
of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
“The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too. 
That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
“Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
“Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet. 
It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and 
utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
explosion. And I mean every- thing.
“So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
 two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."

https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up


https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up

https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up


https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Another... Einstein Lied Again
> 
> is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> 
> permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> 
> of physicists  working on chain reactions in America."
> 
> (between the Administration and the group
> 
> of physicists)
> 
> "One possible way
> 
> of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> 
> who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> 
> capacity."
> 
> ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> 
> "His task might comprise the following:"
> 
> (now i know it's a guy!)
> 
> "to approach Government Departments,"
> "keep them informed of the further development"
> "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> "to speed up the experimental work"
> "providing funds"
> "through his contacts with private persons"
> "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> 
> Who is this masked man????
> 
> Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> 
> "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> 
> Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> 
> Who else...Leo Szilard.
> 
> Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> indication of who that person might be with words like:
> 
> "a person who has your confidence"
> 
> but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> 
> "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> 
> capacity."
> 
> So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> 
> Einstein Lied Again.
> 
> Only Einstein can lie like that.
> 
> oh, did you see the draft?
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> 
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> >
> > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> >
> > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> >
> > and
> >
> > b)  b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> >
> > 'which is at present'
> >
> > being carried on
> >
> >  within the University laboratories.
> >
> > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> >
> > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > the United States President????
> >
> > b) *to speed up the experimental
> >
> > His own little private manhattan project?
> >
> > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> >
> > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> >
> > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> >
> > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > >
> > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > test?
> > >
> > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > hand!
> > >
> > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > Torpedo explosion...
> > >
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > >
> > > Page 1
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > Page 2
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > >
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > >
> > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > >
> > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > >
> > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > >> >> they did in those
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > >>
> > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > >> and he tells her..
> > > >>
> > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > >>
> > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > >>
> > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > >>
> > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > >>
> > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > >>
> > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > >>
> > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > >>
> > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > >>
> > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > >>
> > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > >> --
> > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 8  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web