Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #829857 > unrolled thread

Einstein Lied Again

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 14:09 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 15:49 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-06 16:10 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 18:03 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 18:17 -0700
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-12 09:04 -0700
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 11:32 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 11:57 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 12:45 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:09 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:16 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:25 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:34 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:56 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-03 12:31 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 11:57 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 16:17 -0800
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 13:21 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-13 12:17 -0800
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-15 01:30 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-11-05 07:30 +0100
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 21:09 -0700
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-04 12:07 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-05 12:11 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 14:14 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-05 14:55 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 15:55 -0700
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 16:31 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-09 22:14 -0700
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 15:10 -0700
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 11:44 -0700
                      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:19 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:37 -0700
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-02 21:36 -0700
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-05 10:33 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-06 17:01 +0000
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 11:03 -0700
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-13 19:05 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 00:45 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 02:04 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-19 15:53 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-10-09 15:58 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-05 21:51 +0000
                Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-13 22:08 +0000
    Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 17:53 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 02:11 +0000
        Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:29 +0200
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 00:03 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-07 11:03 -0500
          Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 11:26 -0700
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 11:35 -0700
          Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:38 +0200
            Re: Lies about Einstein Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:53 +0200
              Re: Lies about Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:29 -0700
            Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:26 -0700
              Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:28 -0700
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:29 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-10 03:03 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-09 23:27 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 21:28 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 14:37 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-09-12 17:08 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-30 18:46 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-30 20:27 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 18:12 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-04 13:30 -0500
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-13 22:09 +0000
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 01:32 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:21 +0200
    Re: Einstein Lied Again Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 02:54 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:48 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 11:30 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:16 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 16:42 -0700
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:50 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:19 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again Jonathan <writeInstead@Gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 20:19 -0400
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-09 13:58 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:44 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-09 11:13 -0700
    Never heared of that He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 11:11 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 14:38 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-23 10:44 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-10-11 02:40 +0000
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-03 15:32 -0700
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-05 02:41 -0400
    Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-08 20:56 +0000
      Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-08 15:29 -0600
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 14:57 -0800
    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-13 15:04 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-13 15:29 -0800

Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]

#830066

pyotr filipivich wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote
> 
> > ein Lied Again
> > by The Starmaker
> >
> > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb)
> 
> Einstein was Jewish.


Einstein was of the Jewish Race, not of the Jewish religion. Even his parents were not practicing Jewish religious people.

Einstein was a racist. He didn't like White people. He didn't like Americans...he didn't even like poodles.

And he wrote in a letter about the Jewish people: "...Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them."








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830069

On Friday, August 6, 2021 at 2:09:19 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Einstein Lied Again 
> by The Starmaker 
> 
> (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) 
> 
> 
> Most of yous already read or heard about 
> The letter that launched the arms race. 
> (written and signed by Albert Einstein) 
> 
> Here is a copy of that first letter. 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first 
> 
> In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter: 
> 
> "Sir: 
> 
> Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- 
> 
> municated to me in manuscript,..." 
> 
> 
> I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph. 
> 
> 
> But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them?? 
> 
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Albert Einstein 
> Old Grove Rd. 
> Nassau Point 
> Peconic, Long Island 
> 
> August 2nd 1939 
> 
> F.D. Roosevelt 
> President of the United States 
> White House 
> Washington, D.C. 
> 
> 
> 
> Sir: 
> 
> Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- 
> 
> municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran- 
> 
> ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- 
> 
> mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem 
> 
> to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part 
> 
> of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring 
> 
> to your attention the following facts and recommendations: 
> 
> In the course of the last four months it has been made probable - 
> 
> through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in 
> 
> America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction 
> 
> in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant- 
> 
> ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears 
> 
> almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future. 
> 
> This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, 
> 
> and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power- 
> 
> ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this 
> 
> type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy 
> 
> the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, 
> 
> such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by 
> 
> air. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -2- 
> 
> The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate 
> 
> quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia. 
> 
> while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo. 
> 
> In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more 
> 
> permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group 
> 
> of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way 
> 
> of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person 
> 
> who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial 
> 
> capacity. His task might comprise the following: 
> 
> a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the 
> 
> further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action, 
> 
> giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran- 
> 
> ium ore for the United States; 
> 
> b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- 
> 
> ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by 
> 
> providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y 
> 
> private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, 
> 
> and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories 
> 
> which have the necessary equipment. 
> 
> I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium 
> 
> from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should 
> 
> have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground 
> 
> that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is 
> 
> attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the 
> 
> American work on uranium is now being repeated. 
> 
> Yours very truly, 
> signature 
> (Albert Einstein) 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.

The liar lied and it was not Einstein.
It was you...

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830252 — Never heared of that

name.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#830990

Going back to the beginning of this thread I wrote:


In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the
letter:

"Sir:

      Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com-

municated to me in manuscript,..."



Now, anybody with any common sense can tell that Albert Einstein
was doing all he can to distance himself in the letter. He didn't want
to get blood on his hands.


Beginning the letter with " has been com-

municated to me in manuscript,..."

As if, all he knows is what he read in a book someone showed him!


But it is LIE!

Albert Einstein starts off the letter to Roosevelt with a lie.

But there were may 'drafts' of this first letter to Roosevelt.


Albert Einstein originally wrote in the first letter, in the first
paragraph, this:


"Sir: 

As a result of a discussion among physisists which

took place at my house last week on the initiative of

Dr. E.P. Wigner of Princeton University I consider it

to be my duty to draw your attention to a new and important

development in the field of physics."


Here is a copy of that original draft letter:

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1429557697523843075/photo/1

Albert Einstein is saying that some guys came to his house to discuss
how to build an Atomic Bomb!



Einstein Lied Again





On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:09:49 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Einstein Lied Again
>by The Starmaker
>
>(excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb)
>
>
>Most of yous already read or heard about
>The letter that launched the arms race.
>(written and signed by Albert Einstein)
>
>Here is a copy of that first letter.
>https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
>
>In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter:
>
>"Sir:
>
>      Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com-
>
>municated to me in manuscript,..."
>
>
>I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph.
>
>
>But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them??
>
>
>https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                                             Albert Einstein
>                                             Old Grove Rd.
>                                             Nassau Point
>                                             Peconic, Long Island
>
>                                             August 2nd 1939
>
>F.D. Roosevelt
>President of the United States
>White House
>Washington, D.C.
>
>
>
>Sir:
>
>      Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com-
>
>municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran-
>
>ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im-
>
>mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem
>
>to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part
>
>of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring
>
>to your attention the following facts and recommendations:
>
>      In the course of the last four months it has been made probable -
>
>through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in
>
>America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction
>
>in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant-
>
>ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears
>
>almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.
>
>      This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
>
>and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
>
>ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
>
>type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
>
>the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
>
>such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
>
>air.
>
>
>
>
>                                 -2-
>
>      The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate
>
>quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia.
>
>while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo.
>
>      In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
>
>permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
>
>of physicists  working on chain reactions in America. One possible way
>
>of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
>
>who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
>
>capacity. His task might comprise the following:
>
>      a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the
>
>further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action,
>
>giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran-
>
>ium ore for the United States;
>
>      b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car-
>
>ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by
>
>providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y
>
>private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause,
>
>and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories
>
>which have the necessary equipment.
>
>      I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium
>
>from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should
>
>have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground
>
>that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is
>
>attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the
>
>American work on uranium is now being repeated.
>
>                                            Yours very truly,
>                                             signature
>                                            (Albert Einstein)
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#831058

On Sunday, August 22, 2021 at 2:38:12 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Going back to the beginning of this thread I wrote: 
> 
> 
> In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the 
> letter: 
> 
> "Sir: 
> 
> Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- 
> 
> municated to me in manuscript,..."
> Now, anybody with any common sense can tell that Albert Einstein 
> was doing all he can to distance himself in the letter. He didn't want 
> to get blood on his hands. 
> 
> 
> Beginning the letter with " has been com-
> municated to me in manuscript,..."
> As if, all he knows is what he read in a book someone showed him! 
> 
> 
> But it is LIE! 
> 
> Albert Einstein starts off the letter to Roosevelt with a lie. 
> 
> But there were may 'drafts' of this first letter to Roosevelt. 
> 
> 
> Albert Einstein originally wrote in the first letter, in the first 
> paragraph, this: 
> 
> 
> "Sir: 
> 
> As a result of a discussion among physisists which 
> 
> took place at my house last week on the initiative of 
> 
> Dr. E.P. Wigner of Princeton University I consider it 
> 
> to be my duty to draw your attention to a new and important 
> 
> development in the field of physics." 
> 
> 
> Here is a copy of that original draft letter: 
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1429557697523843075/photo/1 
> 
> Albert Einstein is saying that some guys came to his house to discuss 
> how to build an Atomic Bomb! 
> 
> 
> 
> Einstein Lied Again
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:09:49 -0700, The Starmaker 
> <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: 
> 
> >Einstein Lied Again 
> >by The Starmaker 
> > 
> >(excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) 
> > 
> > 
> >Most of yous already read or heard about 
> >The letter that launched the arms race. 
> >(written and signed by Albert Einstein) 
> > 
> >Here is a copy of that first letter. 
> >https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first 
> > 
> >In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter: 
> > 
> >"Sir: 
> > 
> > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- 
> > 
> >municated to me in manuscript,..." 
> > 
> > 
> >I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph. 
> > 
> > 
> >But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them?? 
> > 
> > 
> >https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Albert Einstein 
> > Old Grove Rd. 
> > Nassau Point 
> > Peconic, Long Island 
> > 
> > August 2nd 1939 
> > 
> >F.D. Roosevelt 
> >President of the United States 
> >White House 
> >Washington, D.C. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >Sir: 
> > 
> > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- 
> > 
> >municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran- 
> > 
> >ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- 
> > 
> >mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem 
> > 
> >to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part 
> > 
> >of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring 
> > 
> >to your attention the following facts and recommendations: 
> > 
> > In the course of the last four months it has been made probable - 
> > 
> >through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in 
> > 
> >America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction 
> > 
> >in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant- 
> > 
> >ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears 
> > 
> >almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future. 
> > 
> > This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, 
> > 
> >and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power- 
> > 
> >ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this 
> > 
> >type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy 
> > 
> >the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, 
> > 
> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by 
> > 
> >air. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -2- 
> > 
> > The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate 
> > 
> >quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia. 
> > 
> >while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo. 
> > 
> > In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more 
> > 
> >permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group 
> > 
> >of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way 
> > 
> >of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person 
> > 
> >who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial 
> > 
> >capacity. His task might comprise the following: 
> > 
> > a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the 
> > 
> >further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action, 
> > 
> >giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran- 
> > 
> >ium ore for the United States; 
> > 
> > b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- 
> > 
> >ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by 
> > 
> >providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y 
> > 
> >private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, 
> > 
> >and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories 
> > 
> >which have the necessary equipment. 
> > 
> > I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium 
> > 
> >from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should 
> > 
> >have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground 
> > 
> >that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is 
> > 
> >attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the 
> > 
> >American work on uranium is now being repeated. 
> > 
> > Yours very truly, 
> > signature 
> > (Albert Einstein)
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#834084

The Starmaker wrote

> ein Lied Again
> by The Starmaker
> 
> (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb)

Einstein was Jewish.


They're all lying Christ Killers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835010

Get over it. The world did not get to win Einstein in history.
The atheists were lying about His God not being His God.
On his last day he had to take back what he wrote
a year before in 1955. He said the atheists were
always his problem but they hid where they were
coming from about religion always having to lose...
Who in science is as honest as Einstein?

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835078

On 11/3/2021 6:32 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On his last day he had to take back what he wrote
> a year before in 1955. He said the atheists were
> always his problem but they hid where they were
> coming from about religion always having to lose...

You lie, Roy Masters Mitch. Why do you lie?

Nobody knows what Einstein said on his last day.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835325

The Starmaker wrote

> ein Lied Again
> by The Starmaker
> 
> (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb)

Einstein was Jewish.


They're all lying Christ Killers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835330

On 11/8/2021 2:56 PM, pyotr filipivich wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote
> 
>> ein Lied Again
>> by The Starmaker
>>
>> (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb)
> 
> Einstein was Jewish.
> 
> 
> They're all lying Christ Killers.

Does Jew on Jew killing action give you some sort of thrill?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835333

whodat wrote:
> 
> On 11/8/2021 2:56 PM, pyotr filipivich wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote
> >
> >> ein Lied Again
> >> by The Starmaker
> >>
> >> (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb)
> >
> > Einstein was Jewish.
> >
> >
> > They're all lying Christ Killers.
> 
> Does Jew on Jew killing action give you some sort of thrill?

He probably married a 'nice jewish girl' and discovered there is no such
thing...





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835622

The liar lies and it was not Einstein.
He wanted no more involvement
beyond Hitler regarding America's
bomb...

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#835624

mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
> The liar lies and it was not Einstein.
> He wanted no more involvement
> beyond Hitler regarding America's
> bomb...

Babbling gibberish.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web