Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #829857 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-08-06 14:09 -0700 |
| Last post | 2021-11-13 15:29 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 93 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 14:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 15:49 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-08-06 16:10 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-06 18:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-12 09:04 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 11:32 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 11:57 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:16 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-14 15:25 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:34 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 17:56 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-03 12:31 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 11:57 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 16:17 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 13:21 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-13 12:17 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-15 01:30 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-11-05 07:30 +0100
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 21:09 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-04 12:07 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-05 12:11 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 15:55 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-05 16:31 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-09 22:14 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 15:10 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 11:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:19 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-12 12:37 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-02 21:36 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-05 10:33 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-06 17:01 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 11:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-13 19:05 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 00:45 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-14 02:04 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-09-19 15:53 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-10-09 15:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-05 21:51 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again jthomq@gmail.com - 2021-11-13 22:08 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-06 17:53 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 02:11 +0000
Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:29 +0200
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 00:03 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-07 11:03 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 11:26 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 11:35 -0700
Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:38 +0200
Re: Lies about Einstein Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:53 +0200
Re: Lies about Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:29 -0700
Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:26 -0700
Re: Lies about Einstein (was: Einstein Lied Again) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:28 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:29 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-10 03:03 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-08-09 23:27 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 21:28 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 14:37 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-09-12 17:08 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-30 18:46 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-30 20:27 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 18:12 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-04 13:30 -0500
Re: Einstein Lied Again Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-13 22:09 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 01:32 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-08-07 20:21 +0200
Re: Einstein Lied Again Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 02:54 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 12:48 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 11:30 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 14:16 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-07 16:42 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:50 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-26 11:19 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jonathan <writeInstead@Gmail.com> - 2021-08-07 20:19 -0400
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-09 13:58 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-09 10:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-09 11:13 -0700
Never heared of that He Llo <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-08-23 10:44 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-10-11 02:40 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Einstein Lied Again Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-05 02:41 -0400
Re: Einstein Lied Again pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> - 2021-11-08 20:56 +0000
Re: Einstein Lied Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-08 15:29 -0600
Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 14:57 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-13 15:04 -0800
Re: Einstein Lied Again Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-13 15:29 -0800
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-12 21:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shlrd5$rrb$2@news.dns-netz.com> |
| In reply to | #829872 |
whodat wrote > Almost everyone lies sometime or another. I see no point whatever to > this discussion. > > Google "things that matter" 1,550,000,000 hits > Google "things that don't matter" 1,420,000,000 hits > Google "things" 5,490,000,000 hits > > That must mean that some 2,570,000 things neither matter or don't > matter. Really? Unclassified is a legitimate category? I think your > posting below must belong to that majority category. > >:-) HAND > > PS I like my posting above more than I like yours (below,) Is that > personal prejudice, or just another in the unclassified category? > GACK!!!! I think I'm having fun. Einstein hated Jews. He would never have allowed Trump's family into his house. Jared's daddy raped a dog. That's why he's had more sex than most of us. Charles Kushner (born May 16, 1954) is an American real estate developer, former federal inmate and disbarred former attorney.[2][3][4][5] He founded Kushner Companies in 1985. In 2005, he was convicted of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering and was sentenced to two years imprisonment, which he served in the Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery. As a convicted felon he was also disbarred in three states. He later received a federal pardon issued by President Donald Trump on December 23, 2020.[6][7] His son Jared Kushner is the husband of Ivanka Trump and son-in-law of former President Donald Trump, during whose presidential administration served as senior advisor from 2017 to 2021. He has 3 other children including Joshua Kushner and he is the father-in-law of Karlie Kloss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-12 14:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e880708e-cfcd-4e9f-9ca3-47cf7655117dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #832264 |
Einstein didn't need relativity. He proposed an alternative that wins in history. Just as he won Bohr in QM reality. Bohr science is proven to be fiction interpretation. On his last day he wrote the atheists were his problem all along but he could not see it... Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-12 17:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iq7c2iFauq0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #832264 |
Congratulations, you keep on repeating a posting that falls into the category that neither matters and doesn't matter. Why would anyone keep doing that, again and again and again? Are you a sock for that Madman of Melbourne, Arindam Banerjee? He keeps posting vapid stuff too! On 9/12/2021 4:28 PM, Iobaties wrote: > whodat wrote > >> Almost everyone lies sometime or another. I see no point whatever to >> this discussion. >> >> Google "things that matter" 1,550,000,000 hits >> Google "things that don't matter" 1,420,000,000 hits >> Google "things" 5,490,000,000 hits >> >> That must mean that some 2,570,000 things neither matter or don't >> matter. Really? Unclassified is a legitimate category? I think your >> posting below must belong to that majority category. >> >> :-) HAND >> >> PS I like my posting above more than I like yours (below,) Is that >> personal prejudice, or just another in the unclassified category? >> GACK!!!! I think I'm having fun. > > Einstein hated Jews. He would never have allowed Trump's family into his > house. > > > Jared's daddy raped a dog. That's why he's had more sex than most of us. > > > Charles Kushner (born May 16, 1954) is an American real estate developer, > former federal inmate and disbarred former attorney.[2][3][4][5] He founded > Kushner Companies in 1985. > > In 2005, he was convicted of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and > witness tampering and was sentenced to two years imprisonment, which he > served in the Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery. As a convicted felon he was > also disbarred in three states. He later received a federal pardon issued by > President Donald Trump on December 23, 2020.[6][7] > > His son Jared Kushner is the husband of Ivanka Trump and son-in-law of former > President Donald Trump, during whose presidential administration served as > senior advisor from 2017 to 2021. He has 3 other children including Joshua > Kushner and he is the father-in-law of Karlie Kloss. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-30 18:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slk3ue$ghp$64@news.dns-netz.com> |
| In reply to | #829872 |
whodat wrote > Almost everyone lies sometime or another. I see no point whatever to > this discussion. > > Google "things that matter" 1,550,000,000 hits > Google "things that don't matter" 1,420,000,000 hits > Google "things" 5,490,000,000 hits > > That must mean that some 2,570,000 things neither matter or don't > matter. Really? Unclassified is a legitimate category? I think your > posting below must belong to that majority category. > >:-) HAND > > PS I like my posting above more than I like yours (below,) Is that > personal prejudice, or just another in the unclassified category? > GACK!!!! I think I'm having fun. Einstein hated Jews. He would never have allowed Trump's family into his house. Jared's daddy raped a dog. That's why he's had more sex than most of us. Charles Kushner (born May 16, 1954) is an American real estate developer, former federal inmate and disbarred former attorney.[2][3][4][5] He founded Kushner Companies in 1985. In 2005, he was convicted of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering and was sentenced to two years imprisonment, which he served in the Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery. As a convicted felon he was also disbarred in three states. He later received a federal pardon issued by President Donald Trump on December 23, 2020.[6][7] His son Jared Kushner is the husband of Ivanka Trump and son-in-law of former President Donald Trump, during whose presidential administration served as senior advisor from 2017 to 2021. He has 3 other children including Joshua Kushner and he is the father-in-law of Karlie Kloss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-30 20:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iu69nkFmqgpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #834870 |
Would you please post your personal issues as your personal issues rather than feigning a reply to something I wrote in the past! Thank you. On 10/30/2021 1:46 PM, Iobaties wrote: > whodat wrote > >> Almost everyone lies sometime or another. I see no point whatever to >> this discussion. >> >> Google "things that matter" 1,550,000,000 hits >> Google "things that don't matter" 1,420,000,000 hits >> Google "things" 5,490,000,000 hits >> >> That must mean that some 2,570,000 things neither matter or don't >> matter. Really? Unclassified is a legitimate category? I think your >> posting below must belong to that majority category. >> >> :-) HAND >> >> PS I like my posting above more than I like yours (below,) Is that >> personal prejudice, or just another in the unclassified category? >> GACK!!!! I think I'm having fun. > > Einstein hated Jews. He would never have allowed Trump's family into his > house. > > > Jared's daddy raped a dog. That's why he's had more sex than most of us. > > > Charles Kushner (born May 16, 1954) is an American real estate developer, > former federal inmate and disbarred former attorney.[2][3][4][5] He founded > Kushner Companies in 1985. > > In 2005, he was convicted of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and > witness tampering and was sentenced to two years imprisonment, which he > served in the Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery. As a convicted felon he was > also disbarred in three states. He later received a federal pardon issued by > President Donald Trump on December 23, 2020.[6][7] > > His son Jared Kushner is the husband of Ivanka Trump and son-in-law of former > President Donald Trump, during whose presidential administration served as > senior advisor from 2017 to 2021. He has 3 other children including Joshua > Kushner and he is the father-in-law of Karlie Kloss. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-04 18:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sm17pi$bhh$72@news.dns-netz.com> |
| In reply to | #829872 |
whodat wrote > Almost everyone lies sometime or another. I see no point whatever to > this discussion. > > Google "things that matter" 1,550,000,000 hits > Google "things that don't matter" 1,420,000,000 hits > Google "things" 5,490,000,000 hits > > That must mean that some 2,570,000 things neither matter or don't > matter. Really? Unclassified is a legitimate category? I think your > posting below must belong to that majority category. > >:-) HAND > > PS I like my posting above more than I like yours (below,) Is that > personal prejudice, or just another in the unclassified category? > GACK!!!! I think I'm having fun. Einstein hated Jews. He would never have allowed Trump's family into his house. Jared's daddy raped a dog. That's why he's had more sex than most of us. Charles Kushner (born May 16, 1954) is an American real estate developer, former federal inmate and disbarred former attorney.[2][3][4][5] He founded Kushner Companies in 1985. In 2005, he was convicted of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering and was sentenced to two years imprisonment, which he served in the Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery. As a convicted felon he was also disbarred in three states. He later received a federal pardon issued by President Donald Trump on December 23, 2020.[6][7] His son Jared Kushner is the husband of Ivanka Trump and son-in-law of former President Donald Trump, during whose presidential administration served as senior advisor from 2017 to 2021. He has 3 other children including Joshua Kushner and he is the father-in-law of Karlie Kloss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-04 13:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iuin5iF3ur1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #835048 |
PLONK On 11/4/2021 1:12 PM, Iobaties wrote: > whodat wrote > >> Almost everyone lies sometime or another. I see no point whatever to >> this discussion. >> >> Google "things that matter" 1,550,000,000 hits >> Google "things that don't matter" 1,420,000,000 hits >> Google "things" 5,490,000,000 hits >> >> That must mean that some 2,570,000 things neither matter or don't >> matter. Really? Unclassified is a legitimate category? I think your >> posting below must belong to that majority category. >> >> :-) HAND >> >> PS I like my posting above more than I like yours (below,) Is that >> personal prejudice, or just another in the unclassified category? >> GACK!!!! I think I'm having fun. > > Einstein hated Jews. He would never have allowed Trump's family into his > house. > > > Jared's daddy raped a dog. That's why he's had more sex than most of us. > > > Charles Kushner (born May 16, 1954) is an American real estate developer, > former federal inmate and disbarred former attorney.[2][3][4][5] He founded > Kushner Companies in 1985. > > In 2005, he was convicted of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and > witness tampering and was sentenced to two years imprisonment, which he > served in the Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery. As a convicted felon he was > also disbarred in three states. He later received a federal pardon issued by > President Donald Trump on December 23, 2020.[6][7] > > His son Jared Kushner is the husband of Ivanka Trump and son-in-law of former > President Donald Trump, during whose presidential administration served as > senior advisor from 2017 to 2021. He has 3 other children including Joshua > Kushner and he is the father-in-law of Karlie Kloss. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Iobaties <Ich8@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-13 22:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <smpd2i$cf7$83@news.dns-netz.com> |
| In reply to | #829872 |
whodat wrote > Almost everyone lies sometime or another. I see no point whatever to > this discussion. > > Google "things that matter" 1,550,000,000 hits > Google "things that don't matter" 1,420,000,000 hits > Google "things" 5,490,000,000 hits > > That must mean that some 2,570,000 things neither matter or don't > matter. Really? Unclassified is a legitimate category? I think your > posting below must belong to that majority category. > >:-) HAND > > PS I like my posting above more than I like yours (below,) Is that > personal prejudice, or just another in the unclassified category? > GACK!!!! I think I'm having fun. Einstein hated Jews. He would never have allowed Trump's family into his house. Jared's daddy raped a dog. That's why he's had more sex than most of us. Charles Kushner (born May 16, 1954) is an American real estate developer, former federal inmate and disbarred former attorney.[2][3][4][5] He founded Kushner Companies in 1985. In 2005, he was convicted of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering and was sentenced to two years imprisonment, which he served in the Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery. As a convicted felon he was also disbarred in three states. He later received a federal pardon issued by President Donald Trump on December 23, 2020.[6][7] His son Jared Kushner is the husband of Ivanka Trump and son-in-law of former President Donald Trump, during whose presidential administration served as senior advisor from 2017 to 2021. He has 3 other children including Joshua Kushner and he is the father-in-law of Karlie Kloss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 01:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <seknrn$3jb$3@news.dns-netz.com> |
| In reply to | #829857 |
The Starmaker wrote > ein Lied Again > by The Starmaker > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) Einstein was Jewish. They're all lying Christ Killers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 20:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5750739.lOV4Wx5bFT@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #829881 |
pyotr filipivich wrote: > Einstein was Jewish. So was the wandering preacher Jesus of Nazareth, called Christus by his followers. > They're all lying Christ Killers. So there goes your messiah. BTW, you should be glad that you are not in Germany, for such antisemitism is not covered by the right to free speech but is a crime there. That is a consequence of Nazi Germany using this and other "arguments" to justify the extermination of about 6 million European Jews from 1941 to 1945: <https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust> PointedEars -- Q: Why is electricity so dangerous? A: It doesn't conduct itself. (from: WolframAlpha)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 02:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3787c083-e25f-4d5e-951f-5c449629bcc1n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829857 |
On Saturday, 7 August 2021 at 07:09:19 UTC+10, The Starmaker wrote: > Einstein Lied Again > by The Starmaker Horrible creature, that Einstein. No wonder his followers are such basTURDs as whodumbo. > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) > > > Most of yous already read or heard about > The letter that launched the arms race. > (written and signed by Albert Einstein) > > Here is a copy of that first letter. > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter: > > "Sir: > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > municated to me in manuscript,..." > > > I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph. > > > But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them?? > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > > > > > > Albert Einstein > Old Grove Rd. > Nassau Point > Peconic, Long Island > > August 2nd 1939 > > F.D. Roosevelt > President of the United States > White House > Washington, D.C. > > > > Sir: > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran- > > ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- > > mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem > > to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part > > of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring > > to your attention the following facts and recommendations: > > In the course of the last four months it has been made probable - > > through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in > > America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction > > in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant- > > ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears > > almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future. > > This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, > > and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power- > > ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > air. > > > > > -2- > > The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate > > quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia. > > while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo. > > In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial > > capacity. His task might comprise the following: > > a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the > > further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action, > > giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran- > > ium ore for the United States; > > b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- > > ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by > > providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y > > private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, > > and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories > > which have the necessary equipment. > > I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium > > from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should > > have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground > > that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is > > attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the > > American work on uranium is now being repeated. > > Yours very truly, > signature > (Albert Einstein) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 14:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sem62m$v49$5@news.dns-netz.com> |
| In reply to | #829857 |
The Starmaker wrote > ein Lied Again > by The Starmaker > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) Einstein was Jewish. They're all lying Christ Killers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 12:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <610EE379.3A7C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #829914 |
pyotr filipivich wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote > > > ein Lied Again > > by The Starmaker > > > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) > > Einstein was Jewish. > > They're all lying Christ Killers. But, but...Einstein went to Catholic primary school. He was a Catholic. But I did hear somewhere if Jesus Christ came back and went to Israel...they have a contract out on him if he shows his face there. He won't be able to go back home...they would KILL HIM! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 11:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <932a0474-27ba-43e7-8be3-18b36bcd5e2en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #829857 |
On Friday, August 6, 2021 at 2:09:19 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > Einstein Lied Again > by The Starmaker > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) > > > Most of yous already read or heard about > The letter that launched the arms race. > (written and signed by Albert Einstein) > > Here is a copy of that first letter. > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter: > > "Sir: > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > municated to me in manuscript,..." > > > I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph. > > > But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them?? > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > > > > > > Albert Einstein > Old Grove Rd. > Nassau Point > Peconic, Long Island > > August 2nd 1939 > > F.D. Roosevelt > President of the United States > White House > Washington, D.C. > > > > Sir: > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran- > > ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- > > mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem > > to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part > > of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring > > to your attention the following facts and recommendations: > > In the course of the last four months it has been made probable - > > through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in > > America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction > > in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant- > > ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears > > almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future. > > This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, > > and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power- > > ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > air. > > > > > -2- > > The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate > > quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia. > > while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo. > > In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial > > capacity. His task might comprise the following: > > a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the > > further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action, > > giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran- > > ium ore for the United States; > > b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- > > ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by > > providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y > > private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, > > and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories > > which have the necessary equipment. > > I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium > > from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should > > have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground > > that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is > > attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the > > American work on uranium is now being repeated. > > Yours very truly, > signature > (Albert Einstein) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. Einstein didn't need to lie. You do... Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 14:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <610EF83C.52DD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #829857 |
In this letter Albert Einstein also wrote: "A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by air." Now, Albert Einstein had in mind the bomb having the weight of two thousand pounds (one ton). But planes in those days were able to carry around 'twenty five thousands pounds' or more. So how can it be too heavy "A single bomb of this type" for transportation by airplane???? Einstein Lied Again! The Starmaker wrote: > > Einstein Lied Again > by The Starmaker > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) > > Most of yous already read or heard about > The letter that launched the arms race. > (written and signed by Albert Einstein) > > Here is a copy of that first letter. > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter: > > "Sir: > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > municated to me in manuscript,..." > > I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph. > > But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them?? > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > Albert Einstein > Old Grove Rd. > Nassau Point > Peconic, Long Island > > August 2nd 1939 > > F.D. Roosevelt > President of the United States > White House > Washington, D.C. > > Sir: > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran- > > ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- > > mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem > > to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part > > of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring > > to your attention the following facts and recommendations: > > In the course of the last four months it has been made probable - > > through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in > > America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction > > in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant- > > ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears > > almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future. > > This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, > > and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power- > > ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > air. > > -2- > > The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate > > quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia. > > while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo. > > In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial > > capacity. His task might comprise the following: > > a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the > > further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action, > > giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran- > > ium ore for the United States; > > b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- > > ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by > > providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y > > private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, > > and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories > > which have the necessary equipment. > > I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium > > from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should > > have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground > > that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is > > attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the > > American work on uranium is now being repeated. > > Yours very truly, > signature > (Albert Einstein) > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 16:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <610F1A5F.723@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #829954 |
Now, Why did Albert Einstein Lied Again about "such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by air."???? probably because he wanted to Kill German people, but he didn't wanted the USA to drop a bomb on Germany because it would kill too many of 'his' people. So, he figured if he can convince the USA to "A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory." then that will reduce the death toll on his own people. Either way, it's Treason to try to trick the united states into a war with another country. (get them to do his killing for him) For some reason 'these people' all hate Germans. The Starmaker wrote: > > In this letter Albert Einstein also wrote: > > "A single bomb of this > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > air." > > Now, Albert Einstein had in mind the bomb having the weight of two thousand pounds (one ton). > > But planes in those days were able to carry around 'twenty five thousands pounds' or more. > > So how can it be too heavy "A single bomb of this type" for transportation by airplane???? > > Einstein Lied Again! > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Einstein Lied Again > > by The Starmaker > > > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) > > > > Most of yous already read or heard about > > The letter that launched the arms race. > > (written and signed by Albert Einstein) > > > > Here is a copy of that first letter. > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > > > In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter: > > > > "Sir: > > > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > > > municated to me in manuscript,..." > > > > I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph. > > > > But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them?? > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > > > Albert Einstein > > Old Grove Rd. > > Nassau Point > > Peconic, Long Island > > > > August 2nd 1939 > > > > F.D. Roosevelt > > President of the United States > > White House > > Washington, D.C. > > > > Sir: > > > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > > > municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran- > > > > ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- > > > > mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem > > > > to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part > > > > of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring > > > > to your attention the following facts and recommendations: > > > > In the course of the last four months it has been made probable - > > > > through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in > > > > America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction > > > > in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant- > > > > ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears > > > > almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future. > > > > This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, > > > > and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power- > > > > ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this > > > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > > > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, > > > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > > > air. > > > > -2- > > > > The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate > > > > quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia. > > > > while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo. > > > > In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more > > > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group > > > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way > > > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person > > > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial > > > > capacity. His task might comprise the following: > > > > a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the > > > > further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action, > > > > giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran- > > > > ium ore for the United States; > > > > b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- > > > > ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by > > > > providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y > > > > private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, > > > > and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories > > > > which have the necessary equipment. > > > > I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium > > > > from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should > > > > have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground > > > > that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is > > > > attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the > > > > American work on uranium is now being repeated. > > > > Yours very truly, > > signature > > (Albert Einstein) > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-09 10:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <61116ADB.731@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #829960 |
another "Einstein Lied Again" is when he said in "Einstein's Letter to Rooselvelt" (or implied) that the Germans were building an atomic bomb. That wasn't true, that was another lie! Einstein Lied Again! What's worse is how many of yous believe it... The Starmaker wrote: > > Now, Why did Albert Einstein Lied Again about > "such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by air."???? > > probably because he wanted to Kill German people, but he > didn't wanted the USA to drop a bomb on Germany because it > would kill too many of 'his' people. > > So, he figured if he can convince the USA to > > "A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory." > > then that will reduce the death toll on his own people. > > Either way, it's Treason to try to trick the united states into a war with another country. > (get them to do his killing for him) > > For some reason 'these people' all hate Germans. > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > In this letter Albert Einstein also wrote: > > > > "A single bomb of this > > > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > > > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, > > > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > > > air." > > > > Now, Albert Einstein had in mind the bomb having the weight of two thousand pounds (one ton). > > > > But planes in those days were able to carry around 'twenty five thousands pounds' or more. > > > > So how can it be too heavy "A single bomb of this type" for transportation by airplane???? > > > > Einstein Lied Again! > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Einstein Lied Again > > > by The Starmaker > > > > > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) > > > > > > Most of yous already read or heard about > > > The letter that launched the arms race. > > > (written and signed by Albert Einstein) > > > > > > Here is a copy of that first letter. > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > > > > > In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter: > > > > > > "Sir: > > > > > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > > > > > municated to me in manuscript,..." > > > > > > I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph. > > > > > > But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them?? > > > > > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > > > > > Albert Einstein > > > Old Grove Rd. > > > Nassau Point > > > Peconic, Long Island > > > > > > August 2nd 1939 > > > > > > F.D. Roosevelt > > > President of the United States > > > White House > > > Washington, D.C. > > > > > > Sir: > > > > > > Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- > > > > > > municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran- > > > > > > ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- > > > > > > mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem > > > > > > to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part > > > > > > of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring > > > > > > to your attention the following facts and recommendations: > > > > > > In the course of the last four months it has been made probable - > > > > > > through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in > > > > > > America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction > > > > > > in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant- > > > > > > ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears > > > > > > almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future. > > > > > > This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, > > > > > > and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power- > > > > > > ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this > > > > > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > > > > > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, > > > > > > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > > > > > air. > > > > > > -2- > > > > > > The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate > > > > > > quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia. > > > > > > while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo. > > > > > > In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more > > > > > > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group > > > > > > of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way > > > > > > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person > > > > > > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial > > > > > > capacity. His task might comprise the following: > > > > > > a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the > > > > > > further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action, > > > > > > giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran- > > > > > > ium ore for the United States; > > > > > > b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- > > > > > > ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by > > > > > > providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y > > > > > > private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, > > > > > > and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories > > > > > > which have the necessary equipment. > > > > > > I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium > > > > > > from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should > > > > > > have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground > > > > > > that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is > > > > > > attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the > > > > > > American work on uranium is now being repeated. > > > > > > Yours very truly, > > > signature > > > (Albert Einstein) > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-26 11:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <u1mfigtvf3asnrrj89igaveipk06hhmncv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #829954 |
Now, Albert Einstein wrote: "A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by air." You might get the 'impression' that Albert Einstein was referring to some German port... But, at that time the Germans only had two battle ships. So, what "port" was Albert Einstein referring too? No, no, no...it wasn't the German port he was thinking of.. (just implied) the port Albert Einstein was thinking of...was the bigest port at that time... NEW YORK! Albert Einstein wanted to scare Roosevelt into thinking that New York was the target. All of Albert Einstein friends at his house were discussing bombing New York as an example. (these guys weren't even American citizens) https://groovyhistory.com/content/50453/ab3c300fc6791f77cbdac1a1a6f22ecf.jpg On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 14:16:44 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >In this letter Albert Einstein also wrote: > > >"A single bomb of this > >type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > >the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, > >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > >air." > > >Now, Albert Einstein had in mind the bomb having the weight of two thousand pounds (one ton). > > >But planes in those days were able to carry around 'twenty five thousands pounds' or more. > > >So how can it be too heavy "A single bomb of this type" for transportation by airplane???? > > > >Einstein Lied Again! > > > > > > > > > > >The Starmaker wrote: >> >> Einstein Lied Again >> by The Starmaker >> >> (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) >> >> Most of yous already read or heard about >> The letter that launched the arms race. >> (written and signed by Albert Einstein) >> >> Here is a copy of that first letter. >> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first >> >> In the very First paragraph reads Albert Einstein First lie in the letter: >> >> "Sir: >> >> Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- >> >> municated to me in manuscript,..." >> >> I will explain and show documented proof that Albert Einstein lied in that very first paragraph. >> >> But in the meantime, how many more lies that Albert Einstein made in this letter? Can you spot them?? >> >> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first >> >> Albert Einstein >> Old Grove Rd. >> Nassau Point >> Peconic, Long Island >> >> August 2nd 1939 >> >> F.D. Roosevelt >> President of the United States >> White House >> Washington, D.C. >> >> Sir: >> >> Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- >> >> municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran- >> >> ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- >> >> mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem >> >> to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part >> >> of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring >> >> to your attention the following facts and recommendations: >> >> In the course of the last four months it has been made probable - >> >> through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in >> >> America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction >> >> in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant- >> >> ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears >> >> almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future. >> >> This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, >> >> and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power- >> >> ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this >> >> type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy >> >> the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, >> >> such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by >> >> air. >> >> -2- >> >> The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate >> >> quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia. >> >> while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo. >> >> In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more >> >> permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group >> >> of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way >> >> of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person >> >> who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial >> >> capacity. His task might comprise the following: >> >> a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the >> >> further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action, >> >> giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran- >> >> ium ore for the United States; >> >> b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- >> >> ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by >> >> providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y >> >> private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, >> >> and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories >> >> which have the necessary equipment. >> >> I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium >> >> from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should >> >> have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground >> >> that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is >> >> attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the >> >> American work on uranium is now being repeated. >> >> Yours very truly, >> signature >> (Albert Einstein) >> >> -- >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >> the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan <writeInstead@Gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-07 20:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <acmdnWiV3uOcvpL8nZ2dnUU7-bmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #829857 |
On 8/6/2021 5:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Einstein Lied Again > by The Starmaker > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) > let me see, should I believe you, or Einstein? Tough choice~ > > -- https://twitter.com/Non_Linear1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pyotr filipivich <trumptheluser01@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-09 13:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sercak$rgb$16@news.dns-netz.com> |
| In reply to | #829857 |
The Starmaker wrote > ein Lied Again > by The Starmaker > > (excerpt from The Man Who Built The Atomic Bomb) Einstein was Jewish. They're all lying Christ Killers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web