Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #890688 > unrolled thread

Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 10:02 -0800
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 17:37 -0500
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:29 -0500
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 16:37 -0800
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:34 -0500
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:41 -0500
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:46 -0500
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:51 -0500
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-16 10:56 -0800
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2025-01-16 14:40 -0800
        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 17:05 -0500
          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 14:17 -0800
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-17 22:44 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 13:55 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:19 -0500
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:23 -0500
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:21 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:28 -0500
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:51 -0500
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 16:14 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:58 -0800
                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:06 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:15 -0500
                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 14:42 -0600
                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 16:19 -0800
                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:57 -0600
                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:07 -0800
                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:45 -0800
                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 22:46 -0800
                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 15:58 -0600
                                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 11:55 -0500
                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 12:48 -0600
                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:01 -0600
                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:03 -0600
                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:05 -0800
                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:15 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:02 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#890749

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> On 1/18/2025 3:51 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > On 1/17/2025 5:17 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Except you are venturing very deep into the heart of KookVille?
> >>
> >>
> > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond\
> > Followers 187
> > Public Views 12,737Â  Top 4%
> 
> How many of them say you know 100% exactly what happens after we die?


after Phd it's 40 years in hell.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890768

On 1/19/2025 12:58 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>> On 1/18/2025 3:51 PM, George Hammond wrote:
>>> On 1/17/2025 5:17 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Except you are venturing very deep into the heart of KookVille?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond\
>>> Followers 187
>>> Public Views 12,737Â  Top 4%
>>
>> How many of them say you know 100% exactly what happens after we die?
> 
> 
> after Phd it's 40 years in hell.
> 
> 

lol! ;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890751

On 1/18/2025 7:14 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>> https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond\
>> Followers 187
>> Public Views 12,737  Top 4%
> 
> How many of them say you know 100% exactly what happens after we die?
.
[George Hammond] MS Physics, Hyannis Cape Cod
.
Hi Chris Thomasson,
You and S T A R M A K E R  are the only 2 people on S.P.R. who
are still talking to  H A M M O N D  !
.
You have mastered computer programming and the extensive
mathematics all of  the well known FRACTAL EQUATION !
.
This makes you a BS in mathematics at least -  possibly an MS !
.
STARMAKER on the other hand seems POLITICALLY ORIENTED
and is LIKELY the ONLY PERSON on SPR who actually KNOWS that
"ANTI-SEMITISM SO CALLED " is 300,000 years old simply because
it ORIGINATES in the elementary difference between the (northern
Lo-Sun white) species, and the (southern Hi-Sun brown) species,
whereby the "JEWS" so called, are biologically HALFWAY BETWEEN
the two because Tel Aviv Israel is located at  32° North latitude and
the Jews have been living there since the beginning of the world
and have become famous as the world's "race lawyers" and they
wrote the book on it – called the King James Bible  !!
.
    Because STARMAKERs is the only one on SPR who KNOWS this –
besides me, no one suggests that he should leave SPR simply
because he doesn't know DIDDLEY Physics !!
.
.

    MEANWHILE,  it's high time that SOMEONE discovered what
"GOD" actually is SCIENTIFICALLY SPEAKING !.
.
It turns out that there are many people in the world who actually
scientifically know what God is – but because it is so controversial
that if you can't PROVE IT --- no one dares to SAY IT  !!
.
It turns out that "GOD" is simply a FULLY GROWN HUMAN BEING
... And science has discovered that there IS NO SUCH THING ...
There is no 100% fully grown person walking the Earth, and there
never has been.
.
But SOME PEOPLE are a lot more fully grown than others.... Which
means that:--
.
  SOME PEOPLE ARE CLOSER TO GOD THAN OTHERS
.
AND IN FACT maybe 50,000 years in the future, everybody on Earth
will be fully grown... Assuming the standard of living gets high enough
we don't blow ourselves up !.
.
BUT IN THE MEANTIME --- in this scientific age, it is essential that
the average person become aware that "God" is a REAL PHYSICAL
PHENOMENON which refers to the fact that NO ONE IS FULLY GROWN
and that the word "God" refers to the hypothetically FULLY GROWN
PERSON .
.
Once you know that, you can understand what "God" actually is
since if the average (adult) person is only 85% fully grown
(WHO, UNESCO data) that means that 15% of the average
adult person's BRAIN is actually MISSING --- some more, some less !
.
And this is the world's number one problem .... And this is why the
physical effect of it it is called "GOD" !
  .
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
NOW MISTER THOMASSON - - - you have questioned how anyone could
tell what "people were doing after they died" - - - -
.
Chris... I'm only here to point out to you, that it is ABSOLUTELY CLEAR
that the average adult human body is only 85% fully grown when it DIES !.
.
NOW BEEN.. It is clearly obvious that if there IS IN AFTERLIFE .... That
the purpose of such a thing is OBVIOUSLY to obtained the OTHER 15%
of our bodies that have been missing all our life, so that we can SEE
WHAT WE ACTUALLY MISSED during life !
    This immediately tells us how to figure out what the AFTERLIFE
ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE !
.
AND IT IS THIS FACT that is you put it "tells us what people are doing
in the afterlife" !
.
George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25
,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890752

On 1/19/25 2:15 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25


No, give the date of graduation so I'd know how soon you'll fucking die. 
You have a bag of pinto beans in my fridge with your name written on it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890763

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> On 1/19/25 2:15 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25
> 
> No, give the date of graduation so I'd know how soon you'll fucking die.
> You have a bag of pinto beans in my fridge with your name written on it.


the date of graduation?? 1960 from high school


Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means????

Phd 'Canidate'? 

https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890764

On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 1/19/25 2:15 PM, George Hammond wrote:
>>> George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25
>>
>> No, give the date of graduation so I'd know how soon you'll fucking die.
>> You have a bag of pinto beans in my fridge with your name written on it.
> 
> 
> the date of graduation?? 1960 from high school
> 
> 
> Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means????
> 
> Phd 'Canidate'?
> 
> https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae
> 
> 
> 


Oh he's almost kicking the bucket. I'll leave the pinto beans bag where 
it is. It won't stay there too long.

Relf was just 64 and kicked the bucket (inside which he also defecated) 
last month. But with these funky "credentials" this one has, I'm 
thinking what if he keeps on posting to sci.physics after dying! He is 
in cahoots with "God" after all.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890769

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Physfitfreak wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/19/25 2:15 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> >>> George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25
> >>
> >> No, give the date of graduation so I'd know how soon you'll fucking die.
> >> You have a bag of pinto beans in my fridge with your name written on it.
> >
> >
> > the date of graduation?? 1960 from high school
> >
> >
> > Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means????
> >
> > Phd 'Canidate'?
> >
> > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Oh he's almost kicking the bucket. I'll leave the pinto beans bag where
> it is. It won't stay there too long.
> 
> Relf was just 64 and kicked the bucket (inside which he also defecated)
> last month. But with these funky "credentials" this one has, I'm
> thinking what if he keeps on posting to sci.physics after dying! He is
> in cahoots with "God" after all.


https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/

you wake up with fleas...

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890773

The Starmaker wrote:
> https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/
> 
> you wake up with fleas...

It appears that Richmond Hammon was corrupted by this guy named Hans Eysenck:

https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/


https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray

Acknowledgements- The author wishes to thank Professors Hans Eysenck, 


in other words, garbage in garbage out.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890782

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/
> >
> > you wake up with fleas...
> 
> It appears that George Hammond was corrupted by this guy named Hans Eysenck:
> 
> https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/
> 
> https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray
> 
> Acknowledgements- The author wishes to thank Professors Hans Eysenck,
> 
> in other words, garbage in garbage out.
> 


In fact, Hammond FIRST whole paper is based on Hans Eysenck!


https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray

George E. Hammond must have fallen for  Hans Eysenck cult.


too late to deprogramme George E. Hammond


maybe in the after life..


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890793

On 1/20/25 12:46 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/
>>>
>>> you wake up with fleas...
>>
>> It appears that George Hammond was corrupted by this guy named Hans Eysenck:
>>
>> https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/
>>
>> https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray
>>
>> Acknowledgements- The author wishes to thank Professors Hans Eysenck,
>>
>> in other words, garbage in garbage out.
>>
> 
> 
> In fact, Hammond FIRST whole paper is based on Hans Eysenck!
> 
> 
> https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray
> 
> George E. Hammond must have fallen for  Hans Eysenck cult.
> 
> 
> too late to deprogramme George E. Hammond
> 
> 
> maybe in the after life..
> 
> 


Probably Alzheimer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890802

On 1/20/2025 4:58 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
<SNIP TRASH>
.
.
.
[HAMMOND] MS Physics
.
Hey "PHYSICS FREAK",  It is a known fact that the average World
Adult human is only about 85% fully grown, some more some less,
(WHO, UNESCO, etc. worldwide data) !
.
And the word "GOD" is used to describe the (nonexistant) 100%
fully grown Man.
.
That is a scientifically PROVEN FACT discovered by Hammond.
.
Are you aware of that ?  - that there now exists a
S C I E N T I F I C   P R O O F   OF   GOD
-
-
?

.
.
George Hammond

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890806

On 1/21/25 10:55 AM, George Hammond wrote:
> Are you aware of that ?  - that there now exists a
> S C I E N T I F I C   P R O O F   OF   GOD


Are you aware that one day, soon indeed, I will fart you out?

Pinto beans has "proven" benefits, but you need to buy them loose from 
Mexican stores to get them. The ones in cro-magnon stores are 
genetically modified to reduce the fart after effect.

You're really a fucked up soul. God wants you to be farted out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890765

On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means????
> 
> Phd 'Canidate'?
> 
> https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae


They guy's fast too, for his age. As soon as he saw your question he 
corrected it on the internet.

Which means, he can put any damn thing he wants in that bogus CV. Hehe :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890766

On 1/19/25 7:01 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means????
>>
>> Phd 'Canidate'?
>>
>> https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae
> 
> 
> They guy's fast too, for his age. As soon as he saw your question he 
> corrected it on the internet.
> 
> Which means, he can put any damn thing he wants in that bogus CV. Hehe :)
> 
> 


Could it be that he's the one behind alias "Whodat"? I wonder. Same type 
of crook.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890767

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Candidate" means????
> >
> > Phd 'Candidate'?
> >
> > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae
> 
> They guy's fast too, for his age. As soon as he saw your question he
> corrected it on the internet.
> 
> Which means, he can put any damn thing he wants in that bogus CV. Hehe :)



I still se Phd 'Candidate' there...
-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890771

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Physfitfreak wrote:
> >
> > On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Candidate" means????
> > >
> > > Phd 'Candidate'?
> > >
> > > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae
> >
> > They guy's fast too, for his age. As soon as he saw your question he
> > corrected it on the internet.
> >
> > Which means, he can put any damn thing he wants in that bogus CV. Hehe :)
> 
> I still se Phd 'Candidate' there...


It seems to me he was a "possiblly" getting a PhD, doesn't mean he ever
got one...



IS EVERYBODY A FRAUD HERE????


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#890758

On 1/18/2025 7:14 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/18/2025 3:51 PM, George Hammond wrote:
>>>
>> https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond\
>> Followers 187
>> Public Views 12,737  Top 4%
> 
> How many of them say you know 100% exactly what happens after we die?
.
[George Hammond] MS Physics, Hyannis Cape Cod
.
Hi Chris Thomasson,
You and S T A R M A K E R  are the only 2 people on S.P.R. who
are still talking to  H A M M O N D  !
.
You have mastered computer programming and the extensive
mathematics all of  the well known FRACTAL EQUATION !
.
This makes you a BS in mathematics at least -  possibly an MS !
.
STARMAKER on the other hand seems POLITICALLY ORIENTED
and is LIKELY the ONLY PERSON on SPR who actually KNOWS that
"ANTI-SEMITISM SO CALLED " is 300,000 years old simply because
it ORIGINATES in the elementary difference between the (northern
Lo-Sun white) species, and the (southern Hi-Sun brown) species,
whereby the "JEWS" so called, are biologically HALFWAY BETWEEN
the two because Tel Aviv Israel is located at  32° North latitude and
the Jews have been living there since the beginning of the world
and have become famous as the world's "race lawyers" and they
wrote the book on it – called the King James Bible  !!
.
    Because STARMAKERs is the only one on SPR who KNOWS this –
besides me, no one suggests that he should leave SPR simply
because he doesn't know DIDDLEY Physics !!
.
.

    MEANWHILE,  it's high time that SOMEONE discovered what
"GOD" actually is SCIENTIFICALLY SPEAKING !.
.
It turns out that there are many people in the world who actually
scientifically know what God is – but because it is so controversial
that if you can't PROVE IT --- no one dares to SAY IT  !!
.
It turns out that "GOD" is simply a FULLY GROWN HUMAN BEING
... And science has discovered that there IS NO SUCH THING ...
There is no 100% fully grown person walking the Earth, and there
never has been.
.
But SOME PEOPLE are a lot more fully grown than others.... Which
means that:--
.
  SOME PEOPLE ARE CLOSER TO GOD THAN OTHERS
.
AND IN FACT maybe 50,000 years in the future, everybody on Earth
will be fully grown... Assuming the standard of living gets high enough
we don't blow ourselves up !.
.
BUT IN THE MEANTIME --- in this scientific age, it is essential that
the average person become aware that "God" is a REAL PHYSICAL
PHENOMENON which refers to the fact that NO ONE IS FULLY GROWN
and that the word "God" refers to the hypothetically FULLY GROWN
PERSON .
.
Once you know that, you can understand what "God" actually is
since if the average (adult) person is only 85% fully grown
(WHO, UNESCO data) that means that 15% of the average
adult person's BRAIN is actually MISSING --- some more, some less !
.
And this is the world's number one problem .... And this is why the
physical effect of it it is called "GOD" !
  .
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
NOW MISTER THOMASSON - - - you have questioned how anyone could
tell what "people were doing after they died" - - - -
.
Chris... I'm only here to point out to you, that it is ABSOLUTELY CLEAR
that the average adult human body is only 85% fully grown when it DIES !.
.
NOW BEEN.. It is clearly obvious that if there IS IN AFTERLIFE .... That
the purpose of such a thing is OBVIOUSLY to obtained the OTHER 15%
of our bodies that have been missing all our life, so that we can SEE
WHAT WE ACTUALLY MISSED during life !
    This immediately tells us how to figure out what the AFTERLIFE
ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE !
.
AND IT IS THIS FACT that is you put it "tells us what people are doing
in the afterlife" !
.
George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25
,

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web