Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #625623

Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged.

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged.
Date 2017-03-28 18:52 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <obebdm$5cf$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <9g1jdcp4imeueshj0iavslb5e32p322ab5@4ax.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.27--9.39P.Seattle.2017> <bee36f79-2833-4ea3-a7a5-e195214cd0fc@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.27--9.48P.Seattle.2017> <0b0b207c-ed7f-4ff9-bce9-a2b3a961ef43@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>One of my beefs is "universal expansion".
>Not gonna happen.
>Have to have a Center.
>Otherwise everything starts running into
>each other right away- like a Cancer.

Why do you believe that?

>So- if we're seeing Universal Expansion,
>either WE are the Center, or it's a trick of
>Light.

Tell me, where is the center of the surface of the Earth? No, I
did *not* say the center of the earth thousands of miles below
our feet.  The center of the *surface* of the Earth.  You should
be able to take a globe and put your finger on the spot, or just
tell me the latitude/longitude of whereever it is.  Of course,
you'll have to tell me why the center is the center.

As to expansion, repeat the same thing with a balloon, where
is the center of its surface, and why.  Imagine that balloon
being blown up, getting larger and larger. Does that change the
answer? Why?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-03-27 21:39 -0700
  Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 21:41 -0700
    String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-03-27 21:48 -0700
      String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 06:10 -0700
        Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 08:33 -0500
          Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-28 08:49 -0500
          Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-28 14:37 -0700
            Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-28 16:05 -0700
              Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-30 13:03 -0700
                Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-30 13:35 -0700
            Re: Infinity is a somewhat useful notion; empirically, it's can't be. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 19:24 -0400
              tessimals noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 18:23 -0700
        Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 18:52 +0000
          Space _And Time are growing exponentially. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-03-28 15:45 -0700
            Re: Space _And Time are growing exponentially. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 16:34 -0700
              Re: Space _And Time are growing exponentially. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 21:21 -0400
                Re: Space _And Time are growing exponentially. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 18:37 -0700
      Re: String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 10:06 -0700
        prrepackageding noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 14:40 -0700

csiph-web