Re: climate change

From	Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: climate change
Date	2023-02-12 07:40 -0800
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<jsdnbj-c1j8.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <d182a4bf-5cdf-4b97-bf8f-bc79d3004879n@googlegroups.com> <63E72ADE.28F3@ix.netcom.com> <63E73F4A.4AB5@ix.netcom.com> <k4rkpkF73tmU1@mid.individual.net> <dc0f85d6-d9d6-478a-9b98-c44d880fa8e1n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 12 February 2023 at 13:33:06 UTC+5:30, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am 11.02.2023 um 08:10 schrieb The Starmaker: 
>> > The Starmaker wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> Climate change is just another...religion. 
>> >> 
>> >> repent! repent! 
>> >> IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!!! 
>> >> 
>> >> the sky is falling. 
>> >> 
>> >> where is my umbrella, it looks like rain? 
>> >> 
>> >> repent! repent! 
>> >> IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!!! 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> > 
>> > Science is a ....cosmic religion. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion -- Albert Einstein 
>> >
>> Predictions are actually difficult. A (pseudo) scientific religion is 
>> actually a possibility, but not particularily likely. 
>> 
>> We have now already a phlethora of religions, sects and other believe 
>> systems and practically a multi-cultural society everywhere around the 
>> globe. 
>> 
>> This is quite ok and we have no incentive to unify all believe systems 
>> into one. 
>> 
>> Such a unification process cannot be had for free, but would cause 
>> unnecessary loss of life in epic proportions. 
>> 
>> Therefore it would be a VERY BAD idea to even try to unify the beleive 
>> systems of the world by force. 
>> 
>> We already know with certainty, that such a process would cause massive 
>> problems, which are by no means worth the result. 
>> 
>> So it is far better to leave it as it is and separate believe, science 
>> and the state. 
>> 
>> Then policy makers could manage the state and religion makers could 
>> compete about their 'sheep'. 
>> 
>> And, please, do not even try to turn science into a religion. That would 
>> be the worst you could possibly do. 
> 
> The Einsteinians have already done that.

You mean those people with real, repeatable experiments and data
crackpot?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 21:42 -0800
  Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-11 08:01 +0100
    Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 13:17 -0800
  Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 23:10 -0800
    Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-12 09:03 +0100
      Re: climate change Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 02:58 -0800
        Re: climate change Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-12 07:40 -0800
          Re: climate change Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 08:12 -0800
            Re: climate change Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-02-12 08:29 -0800
  Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 23:13 -0800

csiph-web