Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #865948

Re: Arindam's Physics :-)

Newsgroups sci.physics
Date 2022-12-11 13:28 -0800
References (10 earlier) <tls3oo$1a1la$1@solani.org> <tmeoqo$1j5b7$1@solani.org> <tn3q89$1tsta$1@solani.org> <661fed04-633d-4f0b-9ede-a475abcc571cn@googlegroups.com> <722130de-7899-4ead-b5db-38530b18ebecn@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <e44f7b03-69be-4ecb-8aa0-e7230e79ee4en@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Arindam's Physics :-)
From Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sunday, 11 December 2022 at 20:25:08 UTC+11, ayaz.s....@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 8:01:57 AM UTC, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Sunday, 11 December 2022 at 16:36:14 UTC+11, Physfitfreak wrote: 
> > 
> > Funny rubbish, showing engineer-envy. 
> > Any fool can claim to be a physicist, merely by chanting e=mcc. 
> > But it takes years and years of hard work and experience to become an engineer. 
> > That is as it should be, for engineers change and re-make the world, for comforts and conveniences, opportunities and razzle-dazzle. 
> > Whereas the highest the e=mcc chanting physicist can do is to identify with cockroaches. 
> > Who wants to be a Roachie? 
> > There may be a point to waving antennae indignantly, in stern fatboy style, like Mr Bill Palmer Sir of fond memory.
> your results may prove your hypothesis but the thrusts produced are so miniscule that they appear impractical for engineering purposes.
No, they are eminently practical for engineering purposes.
The thrusts depend upon the square of the current.
I am in my latest experiments using around 3500 amps to generate the visible change in the centre of gravity of a bulky object, of weight around 18 Kg, by some 700 mm across gravity and some 2 mm against gravity. These figures are from memory, details are there in the youtube videos, the very latest set.
Practical engineering internal force engine motor systems will use more than a million amps so over a few hundred milliseconds, generate (1000000/3500 )^ 2.or nearly 300^2 or 90000 times more thrust. The thrust now is say 30newtons, so we are looking at 2700000 or 2.7 million newtons applied in less than a second with of course, no reaction force, the great discovery of mine.
Details were given back in 2017 in my youtube videos. The links can be easily found.
The above is only a rough estimate, in the ball park.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 00:03 -0600
  Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 18:12 -0800
    Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-05 19:51 -0800
  Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-10 23:36 -0600
    Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-11 00:01 -0800
      Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Ayaz Siddiqi <ayaz.s.siddiqi@gmail.com> - 2022-12-11 01:25 -0800
        Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-11 13:28 -0800
          Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-11 18:34 -0800
            Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Ayaz Siddiqi <ayaz.s.siddiqi@gmail.com> - 2022-12-13 15:47 -0800
              Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-13 15:51 -0800
    Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-17 09:00 -0600
      Re: Arindam's Physics :-) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 00:21 -0800

csiph-web