Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #864604
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Bitcoin |
| Date | 2022-11-13 11:28 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <63714547.5F07@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <1a50d66b-b3a1-4b25-ad37-5390fd7f15e6n@googlegroups.com> <a3fb2635-9a4b-4899-99b4-2ada952c79d7n@googlegroups.com> <c41e97c1-6931-4477-9169-3960eb8a4b67n@googlegroups.com> |
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Bitcoin fell, is Quantum Computing next? Or Artificial Intelligence? So Bitcoin and Play-Act-Spamming in sci.math have much in common. Pretend to do banking and have money in the bank, while in sci.math pretend to do mathematics when all the scam is about-- is keeping some ignorant fool in Germany on the front page of sci.math all day long, all year long all decade long. > > Fabricated Money is a scam from the get-go. Even artificial-intelligence is a scam-- for no-one has ever been able to define it as well as Quantum Computing-- now that is a superlative scam, for not single person in the entire planet Earth can give a explanation of what the shit is Quantum Computing. Not a single person on planet Earth can teach what the hell, what in shit's name is Quantum Computing. > > And I love it when magazines or news reporters talk about Quantum Computing-- for they uneasily pretend as if they know what it is and that the viewer knows what it is, and they jump into the topic in midstream. > > The only thing Bitcoin had going for it was hiding money behind a large prime number for secrecy, something useful to spies and secrecy but hells bells, of no value for money and banking. > > Like W.C. Fields said-- a sucker borne every minute. Or, said, a fool and his money are soon parted. > > So like Germany's WM and his insanity of "dark numbers" is no different a scam than is Quantum Computing nor Bitcoin, nor Artificial Intelligence. All of them involve ACTING, and how that scamming requires expertise in acting. > > Bitcoin compared to Play Act Spamming in sci.math by WM, Sergi_o,Chris Thomasson,Jim Burns, Feldhase, Ross Finlayson, Gus Gassmann, and many other spammers to keep a Germany WM mindrot thread on top of the leader board all day long all year long. You are soooo right. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bitcoin Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 04:47 -0800
Re: Bitcoin Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2022-11-12 12:31 -0600
Re: Bitcoin Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 22:10 -0800
Re: Bitcoin Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2022-11-12 12:49 -0600
Re: Bitcoin Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-16 03:55 -0800
Re: Bitcoin Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-16 11:14 -0800
Re: Bitcoin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 13:35 -0800
Re: Bitcoin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 23:05 -0800
Re: Bitcoin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 11:28 -0800
csiph-web