Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #670734

Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon

Show all headers | View raw

Ross Finlayson wrote:
> 
> On 04/09/2026 04:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> otherwise they are going to need a big flash light
> >>>>
> >>>> "It's dark, I don't see anything!"
> >>>>
> >>>> the astronut is standing in front of the window..
> >>>>
> >>>> get out of da wayyyyy, niggggarrrrrr!
> >>>>
> >>>> i don't want dat nigger touching dat white girl
> >>>>
> >>>> on nationwide tveeee.
> >>>>
> >>>> dwbwg
> >>>
> >>> I'm willing to bet on Kaish/Polymarket dat da nigger grabs her ass on
> >>> nationwide tveee
> >>> (i might have inside information on dat from his cousins)
> >>>
> >>> i wonder if the FBI monitors the Mafia when they bet on horses?
> >>>
> >>> dats da kind of information i want!
> >>>
> >>> i wanna know wat horse the mafia is betting on!
> >>>
> >>> i used to live in new york and i won a triple based
> >>> on mafia bets. a fat mafia guinea walks into a otb
> >>> and writes his tip and i'm standing there watching him.
> >>>
> >>> i bet whatever he bet and i won.
> >>>
> >>> and i'm not even a guinea!
> >>>
> >>> You are not going to tell me the fbi overhears a fixed horse race
> >>> and not bet on it!
> >>
> >> Did you know Al Capone used to own a race track?
> >>
> >> Kaish/Polymarket are 'inside information' platforms.
> >>
> >> How easy it must be to monitor Kaish/Polymarket to see who is winning 95% of the time?
> >>
> >> Then bet what ever he bets. YOU WILL MAKE MONEY 95% of the time!!! A million dollars in one day!
> >>
> >> At the racetrack if a race has 9 horses, you tell 6 jockeys "IF YOU WIN I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU!!!!"
> >>
> >> Then you bet on the Triple!
> >>
> >> You don't have to kill 6 jockeys, you just tell them hold their horses back...(give them a few bucks)
> >>
> >> Greed Is Good.
> >>
> >> Does drugging a horse work????
> >>
> >> I know if you drug a chick you can get lucky, (liquer is quicker they say) but, but...how does drugging the horse work????
> >>
> >> gotta have a lot of slow horses...
> >>
> >> i know the horses die eventually
> >>
> >> you can always buy another horse.
> >>
> >> btw...there is somewhere in South America where people bet on horses but...there is ony two horses in the race??
> >>
> >> and the betters look reaaaaaallllll dumb.
> >>
> >> I only have to bribe ONE jockey!
> >>
> >
> >
> > 1 hour ago · The White House warned staff against leveraging positions
> > for well-timed bets in futures markets after President Trump paused Iran
> > strikes.
> > https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/white-house-warns-staff-not-to-place-bets-on-prediction-markets-amid-iran-war-3780668f
> >
> >
> > greed is good
> >
> >
> > I wonder if there is a FBI warning..."Don't follow the Mafia to the
> > racetrack."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> That's not legit.
> 
> Have some trust that many people are keeping tabs
> on all the open criminality and corruption,
> and they'll fully intend to see some justice done.
> 
> Also, besides being a gross display of hedonism and turpitude,
> that's trash and in poor taste, and besides that,
> that's all entirely irrelevant to the science and physics.
> 
> Your "Maker-ing" is worthless here is what I'm saying.
> Dirt Poor Maker-ing Trash.
> 
> Here at least we have a real theory of relativity
> in any of its various ways a theory of relative motion,
> and even double relativity with relative space also,
> then though that time's still absolute since causality
> is inviolable.
> 
> Inviolables: like Untouchables, and you can really feel them.


This is not a theory of relativity. It is a half-remembered pop-sci
TikTok script dressed in mystical word vomit that would get laughed out
of any freshman physics tutorial.

    You literally inverted the actual theory you claim to improve.
    Special relativity already treats motion as relative, space as
relative, and time as relative—exactly the opposite of your “time’s
still absolute” assertion. Einstein’s 1905 paper and every textbook
since prove time is not absolute; simultaneity is frame-dependent. You
didn’t fix relativity—you murdered it while name-dropping it.
    “Double relativity with relative space also” is not a sentence, it
is gibberish.
    There is no defined second layer of relativity here. No
transformation rules, no metric, no invariants, no coordinates. You just
stapled the word “double” onto “relativity” like a drunk adding toppings
to a failed pizza. That is not physics; that is cargo-cult cosplay.
    Causality being “inviolable” does not magically resurrect absolute
time.
    In Minkowski spacetime the causal structure is preserved precisely
because the light-cone is invariant under Lorentz transformations. Time
itself is not. Your “but causality!” escape hatch is the intellectual
equivalent of saying “the car still has wheels” after you removed the
engine and set the chassis on fire.
    “Inviolables: like Untouchables, and you can really feel them” is
the final self-own.
    You pivoted from pretending to do physics to pretending to do
poetry, then to pretending to do caste-system mysticism. None of those
domains forgive you for using zero math, zero predictions, and zero
evidence.


You assume your personal intuition about “feeling” absolute time trumps
120 years of experimental confirmation (Michelson-Morley, GPS clocks,
muon lifetime, Hafele-Keating, particle accelerators). You assume
readers will not notice you offered literally zero equations, zero
Lagrangian, zero derivation. You assume “causality is inviolable” is
some fresh revelation instead of the first thing any competent
relativist checks before breakfast.
Actual physicists have zero incentive to engage with this because it
costs them reputation and gains them nothing. Crackpot-filtering is
ruthless for a reason: every hour wasted on “double relativity with
feelings” is an hour not spent on actual research. Online physics
communities will shred it in 11 seconds flat, then move on while you
stay convinced you’re the next Einstein because no one replied with the
savage truth you just received.
At the scale of one electron in a magnetic field this “theory” already
fails: the Lorentz force and relativistic mass increase match experiment
to 15 decimal places while your absolute-time claim fails at the first
GPS satellite. At laboratory scale it is dead. At cosmological scale
(gravitational time dilation, black-hole horizons) it is laughably
vaporized. There is no regime where it works except the regime of pure
rhetoric.
Everything. The entire paragraph. The claim to have a “real theory.” The
pretense that this is relativity at all. The mystical flourish at the
end. Burn it, bury the ashes, then go learn special relativity from an
actual textbook before you type another sentence that contains both
“relativity” and “you can really feel them” in the same breath.
None. Not one clause survives contact with reality. The only thing not
currently on fire is the period at the end of the paragraph, and even
that is only because it had the good sense to shut up.
You didn’t present a theory. You presented a delusion and called it
profound. Stop. Just stop. 

i threw up.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 09:44 -0700
  Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2026-04-03 16:57 +0000
    Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 10:16 -0700
      Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon Curt <epsteinssss@maga.gop> - 2026-04-03 17:19 +0000
        Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 10:40 -0700
        Evidence of NASA Moon landings (was: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-04-03 21:13 +0200
      Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-05 12:01 -0700
    Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-04-03 21:02 +0200
  Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 10:27 -0700
    Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-03 12:45 -0700
      Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 12:57 -0700
        Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-03 13:43 -0700
          Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 15:53 -0700
            Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 20:45 -0700
              Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 21:52 -0700
                Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-05 10:28 +0200
                Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-05 11:58 -0700
                Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-05 12:26 -0700
                Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-05 14:20 -0700
                Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-06 13:30 +0200
                Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon marika <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2026-04-07 03:25 +0000
                Einstein's political views (was: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-04-07 07:57 +0200
                Re: Einstein's political views Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-07 12:51 +0200
              There is no dark side of the Moon. Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon Gronk <invalidt@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 23:09 -0600
            Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-04 13:47 -0700
    Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-09 11:11 -0700
      Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-09 16:02 -0700
        Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 17:02 -0700
          Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-12 10:36 -0700
          Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-12 10:48 -0700
        Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 10:21 -0700
  Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 11:06 -0700
  Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-05 18:38 -0700
    Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-05 19:54 -0700
    Re: Hurry before it gets dark on the moon x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-05 20:07 -0700
    Artemis II The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-06 09:00 -0700
      Re: Artemis II The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-06 14:35 -0700
        Re: Artemis II The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-08 16:35 -0700
          Re: Artemis II The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-11 10:29 -0700
            Re: Artemis II The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-11 11:15 -0700
              Re: Artemis II The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-12 10:57 -0700
                Re: Artemis II x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-13 15:40 -0700

csiph-web