Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| Newsgroups | sci.logic |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-31 21:35 -0700 |
| References | (15 earlier) <2f4d8289-0602-4517-a217-210682a0c14cn@googlegroups.com> <df1b3f91-45de-44e6-b7e1-f8d28d15b35fn@googlegroups.com> <92fb36db-7b5b-4267-b182-155ba2a0d03bn@googlegroups.com> <d7beecff-eaa0-422b-811a-5b756cea9f1cn@googlegroups.com> <d5c007bd-7747-4106-b983-c3ccbe0e3623n@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <de5c020e-1e0a-498e-a7b3-866872426de3n@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Why is model theory needed? |
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-7, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 1:10:17 PM UTC-7, Dan Christensen wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 2:50:58 PM UTC-4, Ross Finlayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 8:39:03 AM UTC-7, Dan Christensen wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 11:28:54 AM UTC-4, Ross Finlayson wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 8:21:19 AM UTC-7, Dan Christensen wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 5:09:14 AM UTC-4, Mild Shock wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan Christensens proof still uses a lot of double negation > > > > > > > removal, is not constructive as it is presented currently: > > > > > > > http://www.dcproof.com/UniversalSet.htm > > > > > > Double negation removal is a legitimate method of proof accepted by the vast majority of mathematicians. Must be frustrating as hell for you, Mr. Collapse. (Hee, hee!) > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com > > > > > > Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com > > > > > So are a bunch of derivation rules in the contrapositive about > > > > > implications, the direct variety: legitimate derivation rules, > > > > > that applied to "material implications": result garbage. > > > > > > > > > A proof of said "garbage" would be nice, but I won't hold my breath. > > > Well it's simple, you apply the contrapositive to material implication, > > > but don't know whether you're negating thusly what _was_ a true, > > > or, ..., _wasn't_, a false, all vacuous. > > > > > [snip] > > > > You are making no sense. > > > > 1. A => B > > Premise > > > > 2. ~B > > Premise > > > > 3. A > > Premise > > > > 4. B > > Detach, 1, 3 > > > > 5. ~B & B > > Join, 2, 4 > > > > 6. ~A > > Conclusion, 3 > > > > 7. ~B => ~A > > Conclusion, 2 > > > > 8. A => B => [~B => ~A] > > Conclusion, 1 > > > > This result doesn't depend of the truth value of either A or B. What combination of truth values do you imagine would negate this result? Alternatively, which is the first invalid statement here and why. > > Dan > > > > Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com > > Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com > I've been looking at it and what I need to figure out is about when a premise is discharged, > how to build for it cases, because otherwise there's only one case. I.e., a premise can be > made multiple times, and has to be discharged each time. The idea is that putting it in > multiple orders, it gets discharged out various ways, or "last wins", and then the various > ways together contradict each other. (That ~A => B and ~A => ~B contradict each other, > because B and ~B contradict each other.) > > The other way is about the proof of "completeness", which allows the "vacuity", and basically > looking into an "infinite inference", then for example about what happens when there is an > infinite chain of inferences, how it would roll around contradicting itself. > > ...Then of course showing that with "direct implication" the resulting contradictions don't follow. > > About the contrapositive and derivation rules, is that with direct implication (or here, > just plain "implication", and only the affirmatory not the vacuous, vis-a-vis the causal > and coincident), that (~A -> B) -> (~B -> A), but also that (~A -> ~B) -> (B -> A). > > A -> ~B --> B -> ~A > A -> B --> ~B -> ~A > ~A -> ~B --> B -> A > ~A -> B --> ~B -> A > > > Also there's the bit about "eliminate double negative" is just written in those. > > About the vacuous, it's about as simple as having a set theory > with no empty set (no empty domain of entailment), thus that > the "monotonicity that makes the completeness that makes the > sasisfiability", is kind of the same when everything's framed in the affirmatory. It's kind of like the difference between: "relation algebra (with no nulls)" and "like a relational algebra, except with nulls, and rows", that "material" "implication" is because "nulls". Now, the notion of "like relational algebra except with nulls and rows", is very flexible, but it lacks certain completions that "relational algebra" does not, all "inner joins", and conversely, has "outer joins", and what results explosion of cases to get completeness. ... That it reflects incompleteness in the model with nulls or here the "vacuity of the incomplete", and of course "all about strong types", that "null" has "none", and like, "not a number", "not a thing". (Relational algebra with rows and nulls also helps detail the cases of the application of NOT, in expressions or conditions in the "like relational algebra, except with rows and nulls", vis-a-vis the affirmatory, or without NOT, vis-a-vis the constructivist.) Of course "null" has various ways to assign it semantics or conventions, about that "material" "implications ... of null" can otherwise be altogether separated from "direct implications" the lack thereof. Then, that ordering doesn't matter in the introduction of terms, nor does duplication, in the classical propositional logic with direct implication and always meaningful contrapositive, in derivation rules, basically makes things un-decideable if the order of their introduction is unknown, in the "material implication", while instead it can be sorted when it's only, "direct implication". So, it's not so much that "the derivations are sorted", as, "the derivations are sortable". (And always move in transit.)
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:05 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:14 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:57 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-30 18:45 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 01:42 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 01:55 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 02:09 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-31 08:21 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 08:28 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-31 08:39 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 11:50 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 11:58 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-31 13:10 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 21:12 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 21:35 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 11:43 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 12:40 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 12:54 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 14:24 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 14:55 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 08:31 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-02 08:19 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-02 11:20 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 08:27 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 08:31 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 13:53 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 13:57 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 14:04 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 14:13 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 07:47 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 08:26 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2023-06-04 17:53 +0200
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 15:31 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 17:21 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 17:30 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 17:39 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 17:49 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 08:20 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 10:56 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 13:16 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 13:17 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 14:07 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 15:09 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 17:51 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 22:54 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-06 18:44 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-06 21:02 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-07 11:42 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-07 13:48 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2023-06-07 23:43 +0200
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-08 12:14 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-08 12:19 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 10:54 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 10:54 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 11:35 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 11:53 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 15:27 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 11:59 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 15:27 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-06 18:43 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 05:18 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 05:20 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 10:53 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2023-06-09 21:28 +0200
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 15:27 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 15:28 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 15:45 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 15:51 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 15:51 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 15:57 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 16:03 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 16:09 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 16:19 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 16:20 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 16:21 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 16:28 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 16:28 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-10 08:25 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-10 09:08 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-10 09:13 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-10 12:52 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-10 13:21 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 08:25 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 08:44 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 09:06 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 10:55 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 11:54 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 13:12 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 13:59 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 15:26 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 15:31 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 15:34 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 08:31 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 08:39 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 08:56 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 09:00 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 09:07 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 09:22 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 13:30 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 09:37 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 09:50 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 10:13 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 10:27 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 10:35 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 10:40 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 10:48 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 13:29 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 16:07 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 13:30 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 13:31 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 14:27 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 14:31 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 14:33 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 08:31 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-12 08:30 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-10 12:51 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-10 15:13 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-10 15:19 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 08:25 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-10 08:24 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:05 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-31 08:15 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 11:41 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 11:48 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-31 12:52 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:06 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-31 13:28 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 18:53 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:18 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-31 13:53 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:58 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 14:06 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 14:08 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-31 15:57 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 16:46 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-05-31 17:31 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 02:48 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 03:02 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 08:19 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 08:42 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-06-01 07:07 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2023-06-01 11:03 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 11:08 -0700
Re: Why is model theory needed? Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 11:14 -0700
csiph-web